The Seventh Commandment, Part 1
Sermons on Matthew
Well, please turn with me in your vitals to Matthew chapter five. We continue to work our way through the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus instruction for us as kingdom citizens, Matthew chapter five, just by way of reminder, he has set forth a description of a kingdom citizen in the Beatitudes, he highlights the attitudes and actions that characterize the people of God. They are a distinct people, but in verses 13 to 16, he highlights that they are not removed people. They're distinct, but they're involved. They are salt of the earth and light of the world. And now Jesus is addressing specific ethical instruction or ethics concerning life in the kingdom. We have seen that Christ is not invalidating the law of God, but rather he is expounding it faithfully. I just want to begin reading in chapter five at verse seventeen will read through verse thirty. Do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill for assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one title will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say to you that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. You have heard that it was said to those of old, you shall not murder. And whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment. But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. Whoever says to his brother, Raka, shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says you fool shall be in danger of hellfire. Therefore, if you bring your gift to the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go your way. First, be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him. Lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison. Assuredly, I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny. You have heard that it was said to those of old, you shall not commit adultery. But I say to you, Whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you. For it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish than for your whole body to be cast into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you. For it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish Then, for your whole body to be cast into hell. Amen. Well, let us pray. Father, we come now to the scriptures and we pray for the ministry of the Holy Spirit. We know that you have given our all scriptures given by God, by inspiration of God, and it's profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. And we pray that you would thoroughly furnish us unto every good work. We pray, God, that you would help us to see the evil of sin, help us to see the consequences of sin, help us to appreciate your holiness and your majesty and your glory. And may we as well appreciate that good and holy law that speaks not just to external conduct, but to the to the inner heart, to the inner man. Do forgive us now for all of our sins. Wash us afresh in the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. For those who do not know you, God, we pray the spirit would work conviction in the heart, would show each one here their sin and their need for the Redeemer. And Father, may You indeed set Christ before us in all of His majesty and all of His glory and all of His sufficiency as the Savior of Your people. And we ask in Jesus' most holy name, Amen. Well, as I said, we're considering the Sermon on the Mount and our largest study in Matthew's Gospel. And we noticed that Jesus sets forth general principles in terms of handling the law of God. In other words, their principles of interpretation or what we might call hermeneutics in chapter five, verses 17 to 20. What he does is highlight his relationship to the Old Testament. He says, do not think that I've come to destroy. But rather, I have come to fulfill the law and the prophets. He sets forth the continuing and abiding validity of God's law in verse 18. And then he deals with two rampant, rampant heresies or errors which affect the law of God. In verse 19, he deals with what's called antinomianism. Those who reduce are those who teach that God's law has no bearing upon the people of God. He highlights this in verse 19 by saying, whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, a practical antinomian, someone who disobeys God's law or teaches men. So a doctrinal antinomian. Someone who does not uphold the law of God shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. And then the second error or heresy that Jesus condemns is in verse twenty. What we might call legalism. Remember, we saw that interesting conjunction. Legalists and antinomians both hate God's law. I would argue they both hate God's grace as well, but in the context here, what we're seeing is that they despise biblical law. In verse 20, Jesus does not say, unless your righteousness exceeds the law of Moses. He says, unless your righteousness exceeds the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. So, he condemns these things. Now, he gives six examples in verses 21 to 47, and then he makes a summary statement in verse 48. Well, we find ourselves in that second example, verses 27 to 30, and it is specifically the seventh commandment. Structurally, this is put forth the same in the same manner that Jesus handled the sixth commandment. You shall not murder the sixth commandment dealt with in verses twenty one to twenty six. Now, the seventh commandment versus twenty seven to thirty. And as I said, structurally very similar, very parallel in the way that he deals with it. So, our approach to it this morning is going to be in similar fashion. We'll notice first the contrast, secondly the pharisaic or misinterpretation of the passage, and then thirdly, the correct interpretation of the passage at the mouth of our Lord Jesus. But note the contrast. Same convention is used. Verse 27, you have heard that it was said to those of old, and then in verse 28, but I say to you, it is important that we do not get away from the principles he's already established. It's not as if Jesus is elevating himself over the law of Moses. He is rather, to be understood in the language of Calvin, a faithful expounder of the law of Moses. That you have heard it said was the mishandling, the misinterpretation, the misapplication of God's law at the hands of the scribes and the Pharisees. The parallel of the contrast here, rather, is not between the law given through Moses and the teaching of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is a contrast, rather, between the false interpretation of the law of Moses and the true presentation of the law given by the Lord himself. I hope that you see that. I hope that you appreciate that. And I hope that you understand that, that Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount is not adding a dimension to the law It wasn't already there. We'll see that as we move through the exposition this morning. The Lord Jesus isn't making it something more powerful and more strong. The law of God is moral. It's moral expression reflects or is a picture of God's holy, unchangeable will. It reflects his character. It reflects his purity. It reflects his majesty. It is unchanging. Christ does not come to make it something other, but rather to explain it in its intent from the original institution of it. Christ has already asserted his intention in verse 17. He did not come to destroy. He did not come to nullify. He did not come to abolish. Christ declares the abiding validity in verse 18. Christ warns against the mishandling of the law, verses 19 and 20. So it is a wrong interpretation to come here and say, well, Jesus is adding a dementia or he's making it more spiritual. No, he's not. It's clearing away the muck. It's clearing away the garbage. He's clearing away a false approach to this particular law. Let's look at, secondly, the Pharisaic interpretation. We shouldn't just blame the Pharisees. It is the misinterpretation that I think every man, by nature, falls into at one time or another. Jesus says in verse 27, you have heard that it was said to those of old, you shall not commit adultery. That's true. Exodus 20, verse 14, Deuteronomy chapter 5 and verse 18. But the remainder of Jesus teaching highlights the misinterpretation. It was to treat the commandment in merely an external fashion. It was to treat the commandment simply outwardly, just like he has done with the commandment against murder. The scribes and Pharisees thought they were OK as long as they didn't stop the heart of another human being, as long as they didn't cut a throat or shoot someone in the head or call someone or cause someone to die. Jesus says, No, I say to you, the law has always been concerned, not simply with the outward expression, but with inner purity. If you are angry with someone without cause, you're guilty. If you engage in character assassination, you're guilty. You call someone fool or rocker with an intention to destroy his reputation. The sixth commandment stands and condemns you. The same is true with the seventh. As far as they went, the scribes and the Pharisees could have agreed with the first part of Westminster, larger catechism number 139. What are the sins forbidden in the seventh commandment? The sins forbidden in the seventh commandment, besides the neglect of the duties required, are adultery, fornication, rape, incest, sodomy and all unnatural lusts. They might not have even went as far as to say all unnatural lusts. You see, the catechism rightly shows us the external, the outward abuse of the Seventh Commandment. That's what these guys were doing. As long as you don't engage in the outward form, you're okay. As long as you don't end someone's life, you've obeyed the Sixth Commandment. As long as you've not gone into another's wife, you've obeyed the seventh commandment. But you see, the Pharisees wouldn't have done well at the Westminster assembly because these divines went on. They said all unclean imaginations, thoughts, purposes. They're echoing their Lord, as we'll see in just a moment. The commandment doesn't just stop out there, but it goes inside. It investigates the inner man. It searches your thoughts. It searches your heart. It searches you and lays you bare before the God with whom we have to do. It's important that we get this. The law of Moses always spoke to these things, as we'll see. The Westminster Divines go on to say, all corrupt or filthy communications or listening there unto wanton looks, impudent or light behavior, immodest apparel, prohibiting of lawful and dispensing with unlawful marriages, allowing, tolerating, keeping of stews. Stew is not what you make on the stove for lunch. It has to do with houses of ill repute, places where men ought not to be. The commandment prohibits the keeping of stews and resorting to them, entangling vows of single life. It's not some higher and nobler and more holy purpose for you not to get married. It's better to marry than to burn. The divines understood this. Entangling vows of single life, undue delay of marriage, having more wives or husbands than one at the same time, unjust divorce or desertion, idleness, gluttony, drunkenness, unchaste company, lascivious songs, books, pictures, dancing, stage plays, and all other provocations, too, or acts of uncleanness, either in ourselves or others. By this time at the assembly, the Pharisees would have excused themselves. Thank you very much. As long as we don't engage in the external act, we fulfilled the commandment. We've obeyed the law of Moses. This is why that rich young ruler could say all these things I've kept from my youth. This is why the legalist in Edward Fisher's delightful book, The Marrow of Modern Divinity, can say to evangelists, I have kept these from my youth. They've not understood the spiritual dimension. They've not understood the internet, the internal nature of God's holy law. I was thinking through this passage. It's always difficult to preach a sermon like this. It's difficult for a whole variety of reasons. One, because it's a mixed audience to because you got elderly folk and young folk. Sort of a mixed group. You've got to be very careful. You've got to be very delicate. I know that some out there today think we should simply imitate Hollywood and the sorts of details that we get into behind God's pulpit. I believe God would not have us to do such a thing. Well, one of the other things is the internal, I want to keep saying internality, I don't know if that's a word, externality is. I don't think internality is. Maybe it can be coined afresh, coined its way into Webster's or the Oxford English Dictionary. But it's tough. I imagine if we were just a Jewish synagogue, it would be pretty easy to discourse on the seventh commandment. Just don't go out and do those external bad things and you'll be fine. Just don't go out and murder people and you'll be fine. For legalism and moralism, you don't need the Holy Spirit for legalism and moralism. All you need is a bit of grit, a bit of determination, maybe change your life and habits a little bit so you can avoid the violation of the external command. So it goes to the heart. God is concerned about our hearts. God is concerned about the way we think. God is concerned with what goes on in our mind. Spurgeon says, whereas tradition had confined the prohibition to an overactive unchastity, the king shows that it forbade the unclean desires of the heart. Help you understand verse twenty, doesn't it? If Jesus is not faithfully expounding the law of Moses, he's being very unkind to these scribes and Pharisees. But he's faithfully expounding the law of Moses. These men should have understood it. And that's why he's able to say to kingdom citizens, unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and the Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. You see, if it was simply concerned with the externals, the scribes and Pharisees did fine. If it was simply focused upon not ending people's lives and not actually breaking the covenant in terms of the physical and outward expression, Well, then, the scribes and Pharisees were upright men. Jesus' words are a bit severe in verse 20. No, they should have understood. They should have known. Greg Bonson well says the law demanded inner sanctification and its outward expression. The scribes and Pharisees disregarded the former inner sanctification and perverted the latter. So we've seen the contrast, we've seen the pharisaic or the misinterpretation, and we now come to the correct interpretation. Notice in verse 28, Jesus gives a prohibition against sinful lust. But I say to you, Jesus says, that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. It shows the error of another thing that was common in the Jewish thinking. They looked at adultery in terms of theft. It is theft. It is stealing. It is robbery to a high degree. But Jesus shows us here that it's not just the theft element. It's the perverted sexual element that's involved. God has made this world in a particular way. God has made birds to fly. He has made fish to swim. He has made men to conduct themselves in a particular manner and women likewise. God has given rules, boundaries, parameters for the expression of conjugal relations. marital relation. Jesus says to violate that, to go outside that covenantal context, to exceed the parameters, if you will, to live upon a woman to loss, you have broken the seventh commandment already. You see, it's not just concerned with the physical act. It's concerned with the heart motive behind it. Again, this is not new legislation. This isn't heightening. This isn't strengthening. Calvin says we must not imagine Christ to be a new legislator who adds anything to the eternal righteousness of his father. We must listen to him as a faithful expounder that we may know what is the nature of the law, what is its object and what is its extent. Deuteronomy 20. I'm sorry, Deuteronomy 5 and Exodus 20. What's the tenth commandment? Tell us. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife. How in the world could they miss that? How in the world could they simply focus upon the external expression when God, the Lord at Sinai, thundering through, came and said, Do not covet your neighbor's wife. Do not look upon her in your heart to last, because you've already committed adultery at that point. Job, in Job 31, says, I have made a covenant with my eyes. Why then should I look upon a young woman? Sounds like he understood Jesus' teaching. Sounds like Job understood the internal character of God's searching law. Sounds like Job knew there was more to it than simply its outward expression. I have made a covenant with my eyes. Why then should I look upon a young woman? For what is the allotment of God from above and the inheritance of the Almighty from on high? Is it not destruction for the wicked and disaster for the workers of iniquity? Does he not see my ways and count all my steps? Doesn't he realize the thoughts of my Doesn't he realize the lustful inclinations? Does he not see and weigh me in the balances? Of course, Job understood the internal searching character of God's holy law. It was scribal and pharisaic misinterpretation which had clouded this. So Jesus, in the Sermon on the Mount, is being the faithful expounder and highlighting the internal dimension of God's holy law. Not recreating, not making a new, but rather showing us what the law always intended. Proverbs 6 in verse 25. We do not lust after her beauty in your heart, nor let her allure you with her eyelids. Again, Spurgeon says, if sin were not allowed in the mind, it would never be manifest in the body. Not the progression of thought in the sixth commandment? Unwarranted anger, character assassination, the hatred, the despising, the loathing, the animosity, ultimately yielding to the physical act itself. Jesus is saying the same thing with reference to the seventh. When you lust after her in your heart, this is the spawning ground. This is where you're giving birth to it. This is where it's going to issue forth from. Do not think that you are more strong. Do not think that you are more able. As John Owen Wells said, every lustful thought would end if it had its way in adultery. Every small thought of unbelief, if given vent, would end in atheism. Do not think that you're strong enough to entertain such a thing in your heart without getting it. Thomas Watson, in his exposition on the Ten Commandments, says this as a man may die of an inward bleeding, so he may be damned for the inward boilings of lust if it be not mortified. You've heard that right. It's a hemorrhage. Bleeding beneath the skin. I read once where the KGB could kill a man through beating and not leave a mark on his body. What a claim to fame that is, eh? Kill a man by beating him without leaving a mark on his body. Internal bleeding. Hemorrhaging. You see what Watson says. A man may die of that internal bleeding. A man may be damned of the boilings of lust if it be not mortified, destroyed, killed, slain. That's what Jesus is getting at here. That's what Jesus is highlighting. But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. So in the correct interpretation, he shows the internal character, the penetrating character of God's holy law. But secondly, with reference to the appropriate or the correct interpretation, he deals with the mortification of sin. He deals with how to deal with it. You know, I suspect as well, when sermons like these are preached, we're found out. We get affected. We realize. Power at demand. Well, Jesus doesn't leave us there. Jesus prescribes, just like he did in the commandment, you shall not murder. What's the opposite of the heart hatred? What's the opposite of the character assassination? Reconciliation. This is how you're supposed to deal. When you go to lay your gift before the altar and there you remember your brother has a problem with you, go to him. First be reconciled. See, hatred can't fester in a heart that's seeking to reconcile. If you've got a problem with somebody out in the world and you're on your way to the courtroom, settle with your adversary. Deal with it. Finish it. Reconcile. Pay the debt. Pay what you owe. Get squared. Get clean. Don't keep defending yourself. Deal with the anger. Deal with the heart. And it's the same thing here. Jesus doesn't leave us on our own. He says, I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. And then he says, if he gives specific things on the mortification of sin, notice in verses twenty nine and thirty, he says, if your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. Cast it far from you, for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish than for your whole body to be cast into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you, for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish than for your whole body to be cast into hell. Jesus uses this convention in Matthew 18 as well. Not just relative to adultery, not just relative to sexual sin. It's a great principle in dealing with any sin. But here he speaks specifically with reference to adultery. I want to make four observations on this statement. First, the Lord Jesus is speaking metaphorically. The Lord Jesus is speaking metaphorically. Origen missed that. Origen was one of the church fathers who interpreted this passage literally, and he emasculated himself. Jesus is speaking metaphorically. He's using an image. He's using a convention. He's using language to highlight the necessity of dealing radically with sin. Spurgeon again says, Yet let no man plead this literally and therefore mutilate his body as some foolish fanatics have done. You know what happens if you cut your right hand off and you gouge your right eye out and your heart hasn't been dealt with? You may reflect momentarily on that stump and then use your left hand to commit sin. You may be sad for a bit that there's now an empty cavity where your right eye used to be. But you'll use your left one to sin. Jesus is speaking about the radical nature of dealing with sin. It's a matter of the heart. It's a matter of the inward man. It's a matter of being willing to gouge out eyes that chop off hands. Secondly, as I've already said, the Lord Jesus is highlighting the need to deal with sin. Knox Chamberlain, in his commentary, says these words demonstrate that severe measures are needed to combat such powerful sins. And they illustrate the radical obedience expected from persons who have experienced the powers and graces of the dawning kingdom. These words demonstrate that severe measures are needed to combat such powerful sins. Jesus says, cut off your right hand or gouge out your right eye. It certainly includes get rid of that thing that is a cause for stumbling in your life. If you can't go near the Internet without falling into pornography, get rid of it. You cannot use that television except as a vehicle to satisfy your lusts and get rid of it. You can't read that book or those magazines without it being an occasion of stumbling. Get rid of it. If Jesus says, cut your right hand off and gouge your right eye out, maybe it's time to suspend some of your liberties for the cause of faithfulness to the Lord God. Spurgeon says, better a blind saint than a quick sighted sinner. It's better a blind saint than a quick-sighted sinner. Isn't that Jesus' point? It's better to be in heaven with a stump. It's better to be in heaven with an eye patch. It's better to be in heaven dragging yourself along because you cut your feet off, too. It's better to be in heaven than to be a full man in hell. That's the convention, that's the metaphor, that's what Jesus is attacking here. Thirdly, the Lord Jesus sets forth the importance of a righteousness which exceeds the scribes and Pharisees, namely an inward purity together with its outward expression. Yes, good as far as it goes that you don't go out and physically engage in the act of fornication or adultery or sodomy or bestiality or any of the other things that the Bible so clearly forbids. But if your heart is cleaving to it, if your desire is for it, if your lusts are boiling and you're not seeking by the grace of God to mortify them, as Watson says, you're as likely to be damned by those boiling lusts than by internal bleeding. And then, fourthly, the Lord Jesus reiterates the horrific judgment awaiting those who continue in sin. What's the language in our passage? If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you, for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish than for your whole body to be cast into hell. He used that commandment prohibiting murder. What happens when you engage in character assassination? You see, the Pharisees thought that as long as you didn't physically end someone's life, you wouldn't be in danger of the earthly judgment. Jesus says, if you assassinate someone's character, you'll reconcile with someone. You'll be in danger of hellfire. Remember Gehenna, the Valley of Hinnom, where the children of Israel in the Old Testament went to worship Moloch. Moloch was that big statue that had his arms outstretched, and they'd put fire around the base of it, and they'd bring their little ones and throw it into the arms of Moloch. Moloch couldn't catch, could he? See, we think it sounds a bit odd when we read Psalm 115. They have eyes that do not see, they have ears that do not hear, they have mouths that do not speak. That's a description of the idol. He has arms that cannot catch. So the children of Israel, instead of resisting the temptation, the Moloch worship, took their little ones and threw them right into the fire. This place became a dump. It became a rubbish heap. It had fires burning even in it. It would be like going to the Bailey landfill. They make that a lot nicer in appearance, don't they? They cover stuff up. You don't see smoldering fires out there. You don't see the sorts of things that, no doubt, you saw in the Valley of Hinnom. By the time of Jesus' day, it became symbolic of eschatological judgment, God's wrath, God's judgment, God's curse upon those who continue impenitent, who continue in sin without cutting off hands, without gouging out eyes. Men who reject the pleadings of Scripture, men who reject the warnings of Scripture, men who continue impenitent. That's what he is highlighting here. Those who continue in sin. This text is not dealing with you. If you hear a sermon like this and by the grace of God, you flee to the Lord Jesus. You seek cleansing in his blood. You pray for the Spirit of God to enable you to resist temptation. This text finds you out when you're not going to deal with it. You're not going to part with it. The thought of cutting off hands or gouging out eyes or disconnecting the Internet seems so outlandish that you'll have nothing to do with it. The idea of a covenant with your eyes, the way Job says it, seems just strange to you. Remember in our studies in the book of Galatians, As Paul highlights the works of the flesh, he summarizes or he states this in 521b, which sounds very much like what Jesus is doing here. He says, of which I tell you beforehand, just as I told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. Those who practice such things. Those who live in such things. Those who continue in such things. Now, I'm not trying to minimize or provide a loophole for you to continue in sin. Well, Pastor Butler said no. We need to interpret the scripture properly, Calvin comments on Galatians 521, he says, but in this way we shall be told all are cut off from the hope of salvation. For who is there that is not chargeable with some of those sins? I reply, Paul does not threaten that all who have sinned but that all who remain impenitent shall be excluded from the kingdom of God. The saints themselves often fall into grievous sins, but they return to the path of righteousness, and therefore they are not included in this catalog. All threatenings of the judgments of God call us to repentance. They are accompanied by a promise that those who repent will obtain forgiveness. But if we continue obstinate, they remain as a testimony from heaven against us. If you think it's outlandish to cut off a hand or gouge out an eye or to get rid of your internet, you haven't understood the passage. You haven't understood the internal character of God's searching law. And that brings us to some final lessons. The first is just that, the holiness of God and the comprehensive character of His law. Last week I quoted from J.C. Ryle. summarized the entire section, the murder and the adultery, and a few of the other sins. So it's still appropriate. Are you taking him out of context? No, I'm not. Ryle says ignorance of the real meaning of the law is one plain reason why so many do not value the gospel. You were sitting here this morning saying, this just sounds crazy. This just sounds foolish. This sounds like madness. What you learn in church today, son? Oh, I should cut my hand off and gouge out my eye. Isn't that bizarre? Listen to Ryle. Ignorance of the real meaning of the law is one plain reason why so many do not value the gospel. and content themselves with a little formal Christianity. They do not see the strictness and holiness of God's Ten Commandments. If they did, they would never rest till they were safe in Christ. You may be here this morning content. You may be here this morning satisfied. You may be here this morning patting yourself on the back that you've never committed adultery. You've never engaged in those outward expressions of evil and wickedness. You're not like those people in San Francisco. You're not like those people who march in gay pride parades. You're not like those reprobate that we see that are engaged in ungodliness and vileness and wickedness and unholiness. I'm not like that. But I say to you, if you have looked upon a woman to lust, you've already committed adultery. Now, in the secret inklings of your heart, you just ask yourself, am I innocent? Am I innocent? As Machen said, men would have little trouble with the gospel if they first understood the law. We need to understand the consequences of sin in general, but we need to understand the consequences of sin specifically. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not engage in sexual sin. There are eternal consequences, according to our passage, according to Galatians five. According to Hebrews 13, marriage is honorable among all men. But for educators and adulterers, God will judge. There are eternal consequences associated with our commission of this specific sin. Remember this morning as well, remorse isn't repentance. Feeling bad isn't dealing with sin. Just being convicted doesn't mean you've owned it, had a change of mind, and are issuing forth fruits worthy of repentance. Anybody can cry when they're found out. Anybody can be sad when they feel bad. It is the man of God, the woman of God, who says, I am the man. God have mercy on me. Wash me from my sin and fill me with your spirit and set me on the right course. Remorse isn't going to get it. Remember Esau? Crying. Crying. What was he crying about? Because God wouldn't let him in heaven? He was crying because he didn't get the blessing. Don't misunderstand that passage in the book of Hebrews, not showing us poor, pathetic little Esau with his tears being rebuffed by God. Go back to Genesis. He cried because he didn't get blessed. What about Judas? He felt bad, didn't he? He cast that money back down at the feet of those godless men. He had remorse, but he didn't have repentance. He couldn't recite the Apostle's Creed. I believe in the forgiveness of sins. That's an important statement. Judas couldn't do that. There are eternal consequences associated with the violation of the seventh commandment. But consider the temporal consequences. This is evil because we live in a generation that is filled with the violation of this particular command. This isn't the first generation. But it's certainly a generation. Consider the effect it has upon the adulterer's wife and children. Now, we're going to just, for the sake of simplicity here, treat a man committing adultery. It works the other way, too, ladies. You're not some victim. Not some helpless, hapless victim. The case of rape is different. But in adultery, there are two willing parties. Consider the adulterers, wife and children. Man, think about this, about the effect it will have on your wife and your children. Remember, God, through the prophet Nathan, I gave you, I gave you, I gave you, I gave you. And if that was not enough, I would have given you more. What's that do? It highlights the heinousness of David's sin because God is so good. God's given you a good wife. God has given you a good husband. God has given you that gift. Raise your fist against the Lord. Reject his kindness and his goodness. Consider the effect on the woman's husband and children. You have adultery with some other woman. What are you doing to their household? Solomon speaks to this. Solomon tells us. The way that God only would relate it. People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy himself when he is starving. Do you begrudge a man who steals when he's starving? Seriously? No. It's still a sin. It's still a crime. And he should still have to pay. Solomon does not say otherwise. But when you see a man who's got ten children and no food, and he goes into the store and he steals a ham. Are you outraged? No. No. You probably think about Solomon in Proverbs 30. Where's that agar? Give me neither poverty nor riches. Why? Because if I'm a poor man, I may be tempted to go steal. But people don't despise a thief if he steals to satisfy himself when he is starving. Yet, verse 31, when he is found, he must restore sevenfold. He may have to give up all the substance of his house. You see, Solomon doesn't say, well, it's OK, you got ten kids, you stole a ham, let's just call it even. No, you're still going to have to pay that. It's going to cost you. Crime has its consequences, but then what Solomon goes on to say is pertinent to our consideration this morning. He says, whoever commits adultery with a woman lacks understanding. He who does so destroys his own soul, wounds and dishonor he will get. What's that mean? It means he's going to get a well-deserved punch right in his nose for violating that man's wife, the sanctity of his household, and breaking that covenant bond. That's what it means. Wounds and dishonor, he will get. Men, you ought to be afraid. Women, you ought to be afraid to engage in this because the temporal consequences may be a broken nose. Wounds and dishonor he will get, and his reproach will not be wiped away. Why? Verse 34, for jealousy is a husband's fury. Therefore, he will not spare in the day of vengeance. He will accept no recompense, nor will he be appeased, though you give him many gifts. He's not changing his mind on this. You go ahead and you take him to the golf course. You go ahead and you buy him dinner. You go ahead and try to alleviate the wrong you have committed. He is not going to accept your recompense. You have violated a solemn covenant before God. We need to think about these sorts of things. Consider the woman herself. Or again, if you're a woman, consider the man himself. Consider especially among the professing Christian church. You go out and you commit adultery with a non-Christian. You go out and commit adultery with somebody who's not a professed believer, arguably. Where are you at to be doing this? But listen to what Watson says concerning this. The adulterer not only wrongs his own soul, but does what in him lies to destroy the soul of another. And so kills two at once. He is worse than the thief. For suppose a thief robs a man, yea, takes away his life. The man's soul may be happy. He may go to heaven as well as if he had died in his bed. Home invasion robbery, horrible thing. Guys come in and they kill you. You're a Christian, you go to heaven. Now, that doesn't mean we invite home invasion robbers. Doesn't mean we, you know, just leave the door unlocked. You see what Watson's saying. The adulterer is worse than the thief. He says, he who commits adultery endangers the soul of another and deprives her of salvation. So far as in him lies a God sovereign could still save that woman. But you and your professing Christianity engaging in this activity are helping this woman right into hell. He says, now, what a fearful thing is it to be an instrument to draw another to hell? Consider your so-called Christian testimony. Aren't Christians supposed to be distinct? Aren't they supposed to be poor in spirit? Aren't they supposed to be those who hunger and thirst for righteous? Aren't they supposed to be those who are pure in heart? Aren't they supposed to be what Jesus has described so faithfully in Matthew 5, 3 to 11? Isn't that the case? What happens to your testimony when you engage in this activity? You engage in this sort of vile behavior. You are bringing shame upon the name of our blessed Redeemer. That's precisely how Nathan indicted David. By this deed, you have given cause to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme. What good is your God? What good is that Christian morality? What good is that Christian ethic if you carry on in the same profligate and ungodly way as everybody else in the world? Baal was worshipped below the waist. That is not the way Yahweh is to be worshipped. He gets our minds. He gets our soul. He gets our strength. He gets our love. He gets our adoration. He gets the whole man. Baal worshippers rallied up in sexual immorality to gain the blessing of their idol. And then consider the temporal consequences upon yourself. It's Jesus saying in John 8, whoever commits sin, is a slave of sin. What a horrible place to be in. A slave to sexual sin? A slave to lust? A slave to feeling? A slave to debauchery? It's degrading. It's bad. The sun makes you free. If the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed. We've seen the holiness of God and His law, the consequences of sin. We need to appreciate the glory of Christ the Savior. This is not just a young man's sin. It's not. I remember one of the privileges I had as a young pastor here. was through Don. I'm not pointing at Don and putting her on the spot. I met a man that she knows. And in the course of God's kind providence, I got to sit and have coffee with two, what I call, older Baptist brothers. They were both retired Baptist ministers, probably in their late 70s, early 80s at the time, maybe the earlier 70s for them. It's been some time ago. I thought it was a great blessing and a great privilege just to sit and have coffee with these two brothers and to talk about the things of God and speak about the Bible and various spiritual things. And one of the things one of the men said that will never leave my mind is this. He said, you know, I read once where Gandhi was able to lay down between women on either side of him. And not do anything wrong. This old Baptist brother said, I ain't Gandhi. It's not just an old man or a young man's sin. It's not just a man's sin. It's a woman's sin, too. It's a universal sin. It's a through the age sin. You read from Genesis all the way through the book of Revelation, that sin is there. You know, in studying this out, it causes a bit of fresh appreciation for honest preachers of old. Here's what Lloyd-Jones said. He said, Thou shalt not commit adultery. Of course not. But is it in our hearts? That's Lloyd-Jones. Is it in our imagination? Do we like it? God forbid that any of us, I'm not here addressing you wretched sinners. God forbid that any of us, Christian, non-Christian, saint, sinner, believer, unbeliever, woman, man, old person, young person. God forbid that any of us should be able to look at this holy law of God and feel satisfied. We like that rich young ruler. All these things I've kept from my youth. If we can conceivably be satisfied with our lives because we have never committed an act of adultery or of murder or any of one of these things, I say that we do not know ourselves, nor the blackness and the foulness of our own hearts. We must listen to the teaching of the blessed son of God and examine ourselves, examine our hearts, examine our desires and examine our imagination. He then goes on to say, and this is where I want us to go. He says, I thank God that I have a gospel which tells me that another who is spotless and pure and utterly holy has taken my sin and my guilt upon himself. A study of God's holy law ought to press us into the lap of God's holy law. It ought to cause us to say with the hymn writer, shall I to the fountain fly? Wash me, Savior, or I die. That's what we need to gain. Christ, Him crucified, Him resurrected. We need the pardon of sins that Jesus gives. We need the imputation of righteousness that comes through Christ. We need God working in our lives. We need a salvation that is outside of ourselves. We don't need self-help. We don't need moral reform. We don't need, you need to go out and be a better you. We need to go to Christ. We need to believe the gospel. We need to come to know Him as Lord and Savior. This is a great place in the prophet Jeremiah when God is pleading with the nation of Israel, the covenant community, and he says, return ye backsliding children and I will heal your backsliding. Return and I will heal. Believe and I will heal. Now, as believers, gouge out eyes, cut off hands, deal radically with your sin. But never forget, it is that fount that is open for sin and uncleanness that has been brought nigh through the blood of Jesus Christ. Again, Ryle says, it teaches us this understanding of God's law, our exceeding need of the Lord Jesus Christ's atoning blood to save us. What man or woman upon earth can ever stand before such a God as this and plead not guilty? None of us. We'll say, well, yeah, but you don't know me. Yeah, but I'm really awesome. Yeah, but you really don't know. We don't just have to look at Lloyd-Jones or these old Baptist brothers. What's Paul say in Romans 7 when he's talking about the holiness and the goodness of God's commandments? I would not have known thus unless the word said, you shall not covet. Paul needed a fountain open for sin and uncleanness. You need a fountain open for sin and uncleanness. As Ryle says, without a mighty mediator, we should everyone be condemned in the judgment. God has provided a mighty mediator. The gospel of our Lord Jesus sets forth the life, the death, the resurrection of the Savior. And God calls man to believe that gospel, to repent from their sins, and to know the joy of everlasting life. Well, let us pray and ask the Lord to seal these things to our hearts. Father, as we come face to face with your holy law, God, it does expose the inner man. And I pray that all of us would seek refuge and safety in the Lord Jesus Christ. I pray that those who, by your grace, have sought refuge, who are seeking to live the Christian life, that all of us, God, would deal radically with sin, that we would gouge out eyes and cut off hands, metaphorically speaking, so we can be those who hunger and thirst for righteousness. We just pray for your Holy Spirit to indwell us powerfully. We pray for your presence in our lives. We pray, Father, that you would just grant us grace to receive these things and to pray them in. And we ask through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
