← Back to sermon library
We have two texts to read before
we look at the text in more detail. The first is found in 1 Timothy
3, you can turn there. 1 Timothy 3, I'll read the section
pertaining to deacons. Because we had a lengthy study
in elders, I won't repeat jot for tittle everything that is
overlapping in the qualifications for deacons, but that is the
emphasis tonight. We're gonna look at the need
for what deacons do, and then I'm gonna encourage you to let
me know who you think in our church should function in that
capacity. So I want to read 1 Timothy 3,
verses 8-13, and then we'll turn over to Acts 6 and spend the
bulk of our time in verses 1-7. So beginning in chapter 3 at
verse 8, Likewise, deacons must be reverent, not double-tongued,
not given to much wine, not greedy for money, holding the mystery
of the faith with a pure conscience. But let these also first be tested,
then let them serve as deacons, being found blameless. Likewise,
their wives must be reverent, not slanderers, temperate, faithful
in all things. Let deacons be the husbands of
one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. for
those who have served well as deacons obtain for themselves
a good standing and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ
Jesus. Now turn over to the book of
Acts, Acts chapter six. Acts chapter 6, I'll read verses
1 to 7. The word deacon is absent. We
don't see in Acts 6 verses 1 to 7 the apostles telling the church
in Jerusalem, we want deacons, we want men that will serve in
this particular capacity. But most commentators, most theologians
see at least the diaconate in seed form here. though not called
deacons, this is the persons or these are the people that
would become deacons in the church of the Lord Jesus Christ. So
beginning in verse one, now in those days when the number of
the disciples was multiplying, there arose a complaint against
the Hebrews by the Hellenists because their widows were neglected
in the daily distribution. Then the 12 summoned the multitude
of the disciples and said, it is not desirable that we should
leave the word of God and serve tables. Therefore, brethren,
seek out from among you seven men of good reputation, full
of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this
business, but we will give ourselves continually to prayer and to
the ministry of the Word. And the saying pleased the whole
multitude, and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and the Holy
Spirit, Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicholas,
a proselyte from Antioch. whom they set before the apostles.
And when they had prayed, they laid hands on them. Then the
word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly
in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests were obedient
to the faith." Amen. Well, let us pray. Our Father
in heaven, we thank you for the written word of the living and
true God. We thank you that it is sufficient for all matters
of faith and practice, and we know that that word governs church
life. And God, we pray to you that
you would give us wisdom and understanding concerning the
qualifications for elders and now for deacons, and help us
to look out among us and to find men that fill these qualifications,
men that we can see utilized in the Church of the Lord Jesus,
serving according to their gifting. We ask God in heaven that you
would bless us with the presence of the Holy Spirit now. We ask
that you would bless us again with the forgiveness of sins.
And we pray that we would think your thoughts after you, and
we ask in the name and for the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen. Well, before we look at
any particular text or set this in its larger context, we ought
to consider the word deacon. Deacon simply means minister
or something like servant, and it's not consolidated to ecclesiastical
or churchly use. In Romans chapter 13, the Apostle
Paul says that the civil government is God's deacon, God's minister,
the avenger of God's wrath in history. So in the civil realm,
a minister is to be a servant. I think we have forgotten that
a long time ago. We think of minister today, and
they're almost royal. We are their subjects. But that's
not the way it's supposed to be. As the word would indicate,
they're supposed to serve. they're supposed to minister. So in the civil sphere, that
is the function. In the churchly or ecclesiastical
sphere, that is the function as well. As we read through the
list of qualifications in 1 Timothy chapter 3, there's no emphasis
on the deacon as having to teach or preach the Word of God. He
doesn't have to possess that gifting. However, he does have
to hold to the mystery of the faith with a clear conscience.
He has to have a sure doctrinal footing. But the primary emphasis
in terms of the diaconate is service or ministry in terms
of ministering to the people of God. I think John Gill gives
the most succinct statement concerning the function of the deacons.
The deacons are to serve the table of the Lord, meaning not
only put the elements on the table, but everything connected
to the actual functioning of God's house. They are to serve
the table of the poor. They are ministers of mercy,
and we see that expressed in Acts chapter 6. And then thirdly,
they're to serve the table of the minister or the pastor. That
doesn't mean they come over and cook and serve food, but it means
that they serve in such a way that the pastor or the man preaching
the word is set apart, as we see in this passage, to devote
himself to prayer and to the ministry of God's Word. So that's
what the deacons do in the context of the church. Now let's look
at Acts chapter 6. Now Christ promises to build
His church in Matthew chapter 16. He said, I will build my
church and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.
Now, when he promises that, he doesn't make another promise
saying, and you'll never have any problems. It'll be smooth
sailing all the way. Every time you gather, it will
only be joyful and happy and wonderful. No, there's always
going to be difficulties. There's always going to be challenges.
Up to this point in the book of Acts, the church is persecuted
in chapters 4 and 5. As well, there is internal corruption
in the church in Acts chapter 5, verses 1 to 11. So you've got external persecution
upon the people of God, and then you have internal corruption.
Much like Israel, the church has a two-fold enemy. It's not
only those from without, but at times it's those from within.
Now Acts chapter six shows us another strategy of the devil
to distract the church, and it's that, distraction. This isn't
persecution, this isn't corruption, but rather it is distraction.
And if this is not corrected, then the apostles are not able
to continue in devoting themselves to the word and the doctrine.
John Gill says, so that, as it appears from the instance of
Ananias and Sapphira, that this first and pure gospel church
was not free from hypocrites. It is also manifest that though
they were at first so united and harmonious in their affections
and judgments, yet they were not always clear of feuds, animosities,
and contentions. Satan bestirred himself and got
footing among them, as he commonly does where the gospel is preached,
and there is an increase of it." In other words, if the church
is doing what she's supposed to do, she can't expect, yes,
the blessing of God, but yes, the assault of the devil. there
are challenges to overcome in church life. So I wanna look
first at the problem in the church in verses one and two, second,
the proposal to the church in verses three and four, and then
finally, the provision for the church in verses five to seven. But notice the problem, the time
of it. Verse one, now in those days
when the number of the disciples was multiplying, I want to say
this as carefully and as gingerly and as kindly as I possibly can. But more people typically add
up to more problems. Parents, you've known that after
having one child, and then you throw another into the mix. And
then on top of that, you throw a third, and then perhaps a fourth,
and some go up into 10, and double digits in such a way that it's
a miracle that these ladies have hair, that they've not pulled
it all out. So while God's blessing is evident and manifest in the
church, persons bring with them their own idiosyncrasies, persons
bring with them their own remaining sin, and as often is the case
in the context of the church, we can bump into one another,
we can have some issues, we can have some challenges. I don't
suggest that we try to negate this reality, that we say, oh
no, that'll never happen because we're all so wonderful. No, understand
that it's most likely going to happen, but the Bible gives a
mechanism on how to deal with it. It tells us that if your
brother sins against you, go to him. If he hears you, then
you've won your brother. It also tells us that if you
are presenting your gift at the altar, and there you remember
that your brother has a problem with you, go first, be reconciled
to him, and then render your gift. So my point is there will
be issues. There will be challenges. There
will be a bumping of heads among us from one time to another.
That's inevitable. But the Christian response is
to deal with it according to the word of the living God. Too
many Christians are cowards. Too many Christians just avoid
anybody that would ever stand in their way. No, we deal with
people lovingly, and we exhibit the courage that Christ calls
us to, and we try and deal faithfully one with another. So the time
that this occurs is when the number of disciples was multiplying. The church was growing. Praise
be to God. Now notice the specific issue
in verse one. It says, there arose a complaint
against the Hebrews by the Hellenists because their widows were neglected
in the daily distribution. The Hebrews were Jews from Judea. They were sort of native persons
and native speakers of the language. The Hellenists were Jews from
outside of Judah. So they were Greek-speaking Jews. So you had Hellenists and then
you had the Hebrews. And so in this particular instance,
the problem is because their widows were neglected in the
daily distribution. It seems that the apostles were
governing the situation in such a way that these widows were
being fed. These widows were being cared
for. These widows were being tended to. But the Hellenists
had the idea that they were being slighted, that the Hebrew widows
were getting more. The Hebrew widows were enjoying
bounty, while the Hellenists were being shorted as far as
they were concerned. Now this underscores a blessed
reality and consistency between the two testaments. God has always
had a heart for the widow and for the orphan. In the book of
Exodus, we see mandate, we see command, we see expression given
by God to the nation to tend to their widows, to tend to the
orphans. James defines true and undefiled
religion in the sight of God and the Father in this way, to
visit widows and orphans in their distress and to keep oneself
unspotted from the world. So the apostles are being consistent
with what God had called them to, not only in this new covenant
setting, but in the old covenant as well. So there was a neglect. Now, J.A. Alexander says, neglected,
literally overlooked, not necessarily implying ill will or contempt,
but merely such neglect as might arise from their being less known
than the natives. The jealousy of the races may
have prompted the complaint without affording the occasion for it.
As well, it underscores there wasn't a common refrigerator.
There was still the possession of private goods in the early
church. We see a benevolence on their
part in chapter 2 and in chapter 4 to sell property, to lay the
money at the feet of the apostles so that they could distribute
it among the people. Some have concluded Christian
socialism. That is a wrong conclusion. There
was no coercion on the part of the civil state and there was
no coercion on the part of the apostles. It was a free will
move on the part of the people of God. Now here again, this
was a distribution of food. It wasn't the case that there
was one common fridge and everybody had access at any time to it. That's the practical problem
in the church. But notice in the second place,
the spiritual problem in verse two. Then the 12 summoned the
multitude of the disciples and said, it is not desirable that
we should leave the word of God and serve tables. So they call
the church, they summon the church. They don't act unilaterally.
They don't act without accountability. They act in a wise and responsible
manner. And they lay out this particular
issue before the people of God. So what did the apostles assume?
that the people of God are bright enough bulbs in the chandelier
to be able to figure out certain situations like these. We don't
always need somebody above us making decisions for us. We're
very capable, as blood-bought children of the living and true
God, filled with the Holy Spirit to make decisions that affect
the entirety of the church. It's a wonderful and a beautiful
thing. It's not strict democracy. It
is rather elder or apostle-led at this particular point, but
they work in conjunction with the congregation. And then notice,
it is not desirable that we should leave the Word of God and serve
tables. They don't say it's wrong. to
serve tables. They don't say it's beneath us
to serve tables. They don't say it's something
that we're too holy and pure to engage with. That's not their
attitude at all. Rather, the apostles rightly
see what we call now the division of labor. If the apostles are
trying to serve tables and trying to prepare sermons, they're not
going to do either one well. If they do appoint a class of
men to serve the tables, then that will free them up to devote
themselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word. What's
one of the take-home messages from this particular passage?
No one man Not even a small group of men can do everything. The church is a multifaceted
organism. There are a lot of things going
on. There are a lot of moving parts. And therefore, having
biblically qualified men installed as deacons and as elders help
us to orchestrate the calling that God has given. So the work
of serving tables is not beneath them. John Stott comments, there
is no hint whatever that the apostles regarded social work
as inferior to pastoral work or beneath their dignity. It
was entirely a question of calling. Please get that. The apostles
aren't the right reverend doctor, sir, that have people giving
them accolades. That's not their emphasis. Their
emphasis is, we're here to preach the Word of God. The specific
work committed to the apostles is given there. It is not desirable
that we should leave the Word of God and serve tables. Now when we move on, the apostolic
ministry dies with the apostles. There's no present, apostolic
ministry. Who gets this baton passed to
them? Well, we've studied 1 Timothy
3, verses one to seven. We see that it's the elders who
are given the task of preaching and teaching the word. Remember
1 Timothy 3, two, he must be able, He must be apt to teach. Remember the emphasis throughout
1st and 2nd Timothy and Titus is on sound doctrine. It's on
the function of the eldership to preach that word, to teach
that word, and to lead the congregation or govern the congregation as
servants of Christ, as servants of the people by the word of
God. So the apostles identify the
problem practically The Hellenists are not happy with the daily
distribution of bread. But the spiritual element of
this issue is that it's not desirable for us to serve tables because
then we'd have to leave the Word of God. Now notice in the second
place the proposal to the church in verses 3 and 4. The solution
for the practical problem. These men are smart, these men
are wise, these men prescribe a particular remedy that will
fix the problem. Notice in verse 3, Therefore,
brethren, seek out from among you seven men of good reputation,
full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this
business. The fact that there are seven
called for does not give that as a mandate to all subsequent
churches. In other words, if it was part
and parcel of a diaconate to have seven, we'd expect that
in 1 Timothy 3, verses 8 to 13. Most likely, and this is just
a supposition, I think I picked it up from Sam Waldron some years
ago, probably seven for each day of the week set apart one
man for the distribution of the bread on those particular days. If you were deacon whoever, you
got Monday. If you were deacon whoever, you
got Tuesday. That's as good a supposition
as any that I can see. But the diaconate is need-driven. If there is a need for deacons,
and I suggest we have a need for deacons, we should find qualified
men and install them into that office of Christian ministry.
If there is not a need, then you don't have to just put somebody
in for no reason. It is a need-driven sort of a
situation. Now, notice he gives or they
give qualifications in this particular passage. And we'll end tonight
by looking again at 1 Timothy 3. But notice, therefore, brethren,
seek out from among you seven men of good reputation. They need to be well-spoken of,
they need to be approved. Sort of like when Paul starts
off with elders, he says, they must be blameless men. They must
have a good record. They must be irreproachable. They mustn't be non-sinners because
that would never be the case. They're not called to be perfect.
but there need to be men of good reputation. Notice they go on
to say, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom. Full of the Holy
Spirit and wisdom. Now the necessity of the Holy
Spirit indicates or underscores the spirituality of the task. They're not just to be good managers,
they're to be good managers governed by the Spirit of the Living God. See, the Spirit of the Living
God works with means as well. He can take a moron and cause
him to do good things, but for the most part, the Spirit uses
a guy who has a modicum of wisdom. who has a commitment to the written
word of the living God. And so it's not just a task in
terms of managerial, it's not just logistics, it's not just
making sure that the Hellenists get as much food as do the Hebrews. He must be filled with the Spirit. But then notice the necessity
of wisdom highlights the care that must be applied to the task.
When you're dealing in a situation like this, you want wise men. It's easy for us to read through
this and not think that it's that big of a deal. You've got
one group of widows that are unhappy. Brethren, that's a tough
mountain to climb. That is a tough obstacle to try
and deal with. When men are dealing with finances,
when they're dealing with food, when they're dealing with logistics,
when they're dealing with organization, when they're dealing with the
sorts of things that these men are gonna deal with, you want
men to have wisdom, don't you? It's pretty obvious and it should
be pretty self-evident that the Holy Spirit and wisdom are requisite
gifts for those involved in service to the church of the Lord Jesus
Christ. Now notice the function. It says,
therefore, brethren, seek out from among you seven men of good
reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may
appoint over this business. This doesn't necessarily mean
that Philip, or Stephen rather, was the man, or Stephen and Philip
were men, or the rest of these particular deacons were men that
were doing everything. No, they were men as well that
would delegate to others. You see that delegation of judicial
authority in Exodus chapter 18. It's a wonderful principle. Remember
that Moses is wearing himself out by adjudicating all of the
issues and the challenges of Israel. And Jethro, his converted
father-in-law, comes to him and says, basically, you're going
to kill yourself. There's no one man that can do all that
you're doing. You need to appoint other men
such that they can take some of the not as important stuff
and then Moses, you can function as the Supreme Court in Israel. It made good sense. It was good
application of wisdom. So Moses imbibes that and he
puts it into place. So the apostles will establish
the deacons over this particular work. The apostles would appoint
them over this business, which further evidences and demonstrates
that this business is important. This business is crucial. This
business demands to have men govern it in such a way as to
bring it about effectively. They don't say, well, you know,
because these Hellenists are complaining, we're going to just
end it. This is why we can't have good things. You need to
stop. That's not how they handle it. As well, they don't engage
in, you know, ethnic counseling. Oh, you know, you need to be
more woke. You Hellenists, you need to be a bit more sympathetic
to the Hebrews and the Hebrew. That's not the problem. The problem
is it was a matter of logistics. It was a matter of distribution. It was a matter of putting food
on the table. The apostles implement the division
of labor for the glory of God. So that would solve the practical
problem and thus, it would alleviate the spiritual problem. Notice
in verse four, but we will give ourselves continually to prayer
and to the ministry of the word. We will busy ourselves with,
we will be busily engaged in, we will be devoted to the preaching
of God's word and praying for the people. Now brethren, it's
at times like these that some say, well, you know, that's not
as important, the preaching and the praying. It's more about
putting food on the table. Everybody wants to approach church
life as an either-or. No, we should see it as a both-and.
practical acts of charity, and as well an emphasis upon a sound
gospel ministry. It shouldn't be the case that
we have one or the other. We should aim by the grace of
God to have a both and robust situation of practical concern
and doctrinal devotion. And so the apostles function.
Notice, underscored here, we will give ourselves continually
to prayer and to the ministry of the word. These are apostles. These are the men that if anybody
ever should have gotten a nice parking spot and should have
been addressed with right reverend sir, it would have been them.
But they don't want that. They don't want notoriety. They
don't want celebrity. They don't want to be out in
the public eye. They don't want to be shucking and jiving and
doing all that. They want to devote themselves
to prayer and to the ministry of the word. They want to devote
themselves to the extension of Christ's kingdom. They want to
devote themselves to that which God called them for. That is
biblical, that is good, that is absolutely admirable in this
instance. Poole says the two great employees
of a minister of Jesus Christ, to pray unto God for the people
and to speak unto the people from the Lord. John Gill says
these two, prayer and preaching, are the principal employment
of a gospel ministry, and are what he ought to be concerned
in, not only now and then, but what he should be given or give
himself up unto wholly, that his profiting might appear, and
what he should be continually exercised and employed in. Great emphasis by John Gill.
It's a great emphasis that we see in the proven masters in
the church of the Lord Jesus Christ. Everyone to a man saw
the emphasis in terms of biblical eldership and biblical diaconate. Why? For the advancement of the
cause of Jesus Christ. I'm going to give you a bit of
a foreshadowing. What happens after they appoint the deacons?
Then the word of the Lord spread. What do we conclude from that?
That a biblically ordered church functioning according to the
mind of Christ, with elders and deacons, is a ripe place for
the conversion of sinners. In other words, faith comes by
hearing, and hearing by the Word of God. And if there is a class
of men separated unto the preaching of that Word, and there is a
class of men, get this, to protect those men, that evidences to
us the heart of God in the saving of sinners, and it also evidences
to us the kinds of churches that the Lord God blesses. Now certainly
he can bless churches where there isn't elders and deacons, that's
not the issue. But there is a close connection
between the appointment of these deacons and then the spread of
the word of the Lord. So look at, finally, the provision
for the church in verses 5 to 7. Notice the choice of the men. The saying pleased the whole
multitude. Why wouldn't it? Right? You've
got the mind of Christ, your blood bought, you have the Holy
Spirit. The apostles come, they say, we've got a practical problem.
The Hellenists are upset at the Hebrews. This is going to keep
us from ministering to them in a way that is beneficial for
them, but in a way that is beneficial for the entirety of the church,
because we're going to be kept back from the word and from prayer.
So find good men, men of good reputation, men who have the
Holy Spirit, men who have wisdom. set them apart, we can appoint
them over this business, and then we can do what we're supposed
to do, vis-a-vis devote ourselves to preaching and to prayer. So, of course, the people of
God said yes. Notice, they chose Stephen, a
man full of faith, and the Holy Spirit, and Philip. Those are
the two men that we read of further. Stephen, Pharis, large in chapter
7, and then Philip in chapter 8. there's this man Procurus,
Decanter, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicholas. Some in the early church
thought this Nicholas was the hatcher of the vile heresy associated
with the Nicolaitans in the book of Revelation. I don't know about
that, but that's what at least Irenaeus and a couple of others
thought. But anyways, they pick these particular men and then
they appoint the men. Notice in verse 6, It says, whom
they set before the apostles, and when they had prayed, they
laid hands on them. So the same sort of thing that
we see with reference to elders. In Acts chapter 14, Paul will
go back through the cities and churches he established in the
first missionary journey. He will then have the church
by common suffrage, select men for the eldership. They pray
and they fast and they appoint those men to the eldership by
the laying on of hands. You see the same emphasis here.
Our confession says, the way appointed by Christ for the calling
of any person fitted and gifted by the Holy Spirit unto the office
of bishop or elder in a church is that he be chosen thereunto
by the common suffrage of the church itself and solemnly set
apart by fasting and prayer with imposition of hands of the eldership
of the church if there be any before constituted therein. and
of a deacon, that he be chosen by the like suffrage, and set
apart by prayer, and the like imposition of hands." So there
is an order involved in this. There are qualifications given
for this, which is obviously suggestive that it's an abiding
office in the church of the Lord Jesus Christ until he comes again
in glory to judge the living and the dead. It is a simple
process, but a most effective process. And again, it underscores
the heart of God in terms of the salvation of sinners. Not
only does he set apart a class of men to preach the gospel to
those sinners, he sets apart a class of men to protect those
men so that they can preach the gospel to sinners. It always
amazes me when hyper-Calvinists think that God really doesn't
want to save people. Everything in the Bible is designed
to tell us that God wants to save people. Every jot and tittle
converges on that blessed reality. Jesus said, I've come to seek
and to save that which was lost. We turn to the book of Revelation.
There's a great multitude that no man can number from every
tribe and tongue and people and nation. But again, I think this
is a powerful argument for the goodness and the large heartedness
of God most high towards sinners. He wants you saved in such a
way that He's ordained a class of men to preach the gospel to
you. And He's ordained a class of
men to protect those men so they can preach the gospel to you.
And then notice the progress of the church. Go up to chapter
9. There's several progress reports
that you find in the book of Acts. It's Luke telling us the
effect of the word as it is being proclaimed. Acts 9.31. Then the churches throughout
all Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified. And
walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy
Spirit, they were multiplied." That's a progress report. Turn over to chapter 12 at verse
24. A most intriguing one, because
the chapter starts off with James being beheaded and then Peter
being thrown in prison. And then the chapter ends with
a progress report. Verse 24, but the word of God
grew and multiplied. John Stott says the chapter,
chapter 12, opens with James dead, Peter in prison, and Herod
triumphing. It closes with Herod dead, Peter
free, and the word of God triumphing. Such is the power of God to overthrow
hostile human plans and to establish his own in their place. Tyrants
may be permitted for a time to boast and bluster, oppressing
the church and hindering the gospel, but they will not last. In the end, their empire will
be broken and their pride abased. That's a great way to describe
Acts chapter 12. That hits the nail on the proverbial
head. Look at Acts 16. Acts 16, Paul
comes into the region of Derbe and Lystra. He hears of Timothy. He wants him to accompany him
on the second missionary journey. And then notice what we see in
verse five. So the churches were strengthened in the faith. and
increased in number daily. Turn over to Acts chapter 19.
These are great things. These progress reports, again,
in the midst of persecution, in the midst of increasing hostility,
not only from the unbelieving Jews, but increasingly from the
Roman civil state, nevertheless, God is carrying out his purpose
and plan. Notice in Ephesus at Acts 19.20. So the word of the Lord grew
mightily and prevailed. And then there's a progress report
at the end of the book of Acts. It ends with such. Acts 28, 30. Then Paul dwelt two whole years
in his own rented house and received all who came to him, preaching
the kingdom of God and teaching the things which concern the
Lord Jesus Christ with all confidence, no one forbidding him. So you
see the apostle ends up in prison at the end of the book of Acts.
We might conclude without the progress report, oh no, everything
is lost. But no, Luke tells us this was
another opportunity for the apostle to preach and teach the word
of God. And it's there that he writes Ephesians, Philippians,
and Colossians. So back to Acts chapter six,
notice at verse seven, then that connects us to the preceding
context. So what we have is that they
sat before the apostles, those seven men, according to verse
six, when the apostles had prayed, the apostles laid hands on them.
Then the Word of God spread, and the number of the disciples
multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests
were obedient to the faith. So the practical problem was
dealt with, which freed up the servants of the Word, or the
ministers of the Word, with reference to the spiritual problem. Now
that the practical was taken care of, so was the spiritual.
They preach the word, they're devoted to the word and prayer,
and thus God blesses it, the word of God spreads, and the
number of the disciples multiplies greatly. And this comment that
a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith. Listen
to John Gill. And that the priests and a large
number of them should do this is very marvelous, since they
were the most inveterate enemies of the gospel and persecutors
of the saints. But what is it that efficacious
grace cannot do? It can certainly conquer the
inveterate enemies of the church. It will do so in Acts chapter
9 with the conversion of Saul of Tarsus. So you free up the
man of God to give himself to prayer and to the ministry of
the Word of God, and what happens? Faith comes by hearing, and hearing
by the Word of God. It's not rocket science, brethren.
It's not splitting the atom. It is simply functioning in accordance
with God's Holy Word in terms of the way He regulates the church
and her conduct. Now, in conclusion, we ought
to reckon with, first of all, the problems facing the Church. It's not just the external threat,
but there is an internal threat. The case of Ananias and Sapphira
underscore corruption. The case of the various heretics
named in the New Testament underscore corruption. This one, again,
it's not corruption, it's not heresy, but it is distraction. It is something that can jeopardize
the smooth operation of the church of the Lord Jesus Christ. So
by God's grace, we seek to tend to those things so that we can
keep the ship moving. Secondly, the government of the
church. The abiding offices in the church
are elders and deacons. There are no more apostles. With
the death of the final apostle, the apostolic ministry was no
more. It was foundational. It was specific,
it was given for a time, but it is no longer in perpetuity.
The remaining offices are those addressed by Paul in 1 Timothy
3, 1-7, Elders 8-13, Deacons. The division of labor in the
church is crucial. Again, whenever you look at these
terms used, Philippians 1.1, it speaks of elders, plural,
and deacons. Why elders, plural? Because no one man can do everything
that is requisite in church life. The division of labor is crucial. And then the presence, however,
not however, but I should always remind us, the presence of church
officers doesn't mean complete inactivity on the part of church
members. Now, early on, well, not early
on, but a couple of years in my... Life as a Christian, I
was a deacon in the church in Palmdale. And I'll never forget
a time when I was vacuuming the floor, and I was near a brother,
and this brother just lifted his feet so I could vacuum under
his feet. And I thought, it would be nice
for you to get up and move. I got struggles, brethren. I'm
not an absolute holy man. I'm not a perfect man. But there
was almost this attitude that, oh, this guy will do it. That's
not the way we're supposed to view deacons and elders. It's not the case. Sometimes,
this is probably going to make you think I'm really weird, but
I'll see a piece of trash in the parking lot and I leave it
there. And I wonder, is it going to be the deacons that pick it
up or is there somebody else that will pick it up? We ought
not to think, oh, well, we've got beacons. They can pick up
the trash. We've got an elder that works
here all week. He can pick up all the excrement. And I do. I'll do that because
I don't think you should leave that laying around. But the bottom
line is the presence of officers in the church does not equal
inactivity on the part of the members of the church. Just because
we have a functioning diaconate and a functioning eldership doesn't
mean you get to sit in the pew and grow moss. It is absolutely
unacceptable if your thought process is, well, there are deacons
to go plunge the toilet. Go plunge the toilet, serve the
deacon. He will probably enjoy that blessing
in his life. So I always feel constrained
to make that observation. Now go to 1 Timothy 3, just a
couple of quick thoughts and then we close. 1 Timothy 3, as
I said, we spent much time in the qualifications for elders.
You can see the overlap involved in terms of the deacons. Verse
8 describes his personal conduct. Likewise, deacons must be reverent,
not double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy for
money. Again, obvious, evident, as plain
as the nose on your face. It is the deacons that function
in terms of the church finances. You don't want a man who's greedy
for money holding the money bag. Judas was an obvious problem
in the apostolate. And then notice you've got his
doctrinal conviction. Again, just because he's not
apt to teach or isn't required to be apt to teach doesn't mean
he needs to be a novice theologically. It doesn't mean he doesn't need
to know the Bible and good theology. Verse 9, holding the mystery
of the faith with a pure conscience. He's holding it because he understands
it. He's appropriated it by faith
and it is that by which he lives. Notice in the third place is
proven faithfulness, verse 10. But let these also first be tested,
then let them serve as deacons, being found blameless. And then
notice his domestic situation. Again, corresponding much with
what we have in the description of the eldership. So verses 11
and 12 underscore his domestic situation with this particular
difference. Notice in verse 11, likewise
their wives must be reverent, not slanderers, temperate, faithful
in all things. I didn't have time to check the
other translations, or I just didn't even think to, but there
are those who perhaps translate this differently. There is some
degree of disagreement on this particular section. Some suggest
this isn't deacon's wives, but rather it is deaconesses, women
deacons or women who function in the diaconate. Or perhaps
they were a class of women, perhaps older women, that would serve
in this particular capacity. I think this is the proper translation. I think that this is the proper
way to view it. I think that what Paul is saying
is that with reference to the deacons, their wives have qualification. Why doesn't he say that the elder's
wife has qualification? Because Paul's supposition is
clear and it's simple. Paul does not assume that the
elder's wife will help him elder. His task is to preach and teach
the word of God and to govern the church. Two things prohibited
of women in 1 Timothy chapter two. So the apostle doesn't give
qualifications for the elder's wife. That doesn't mean she can
be a wino and lay around all day and watch soap operas and
steal candy bars and be a rat. No, it doesn't mean that at all.
But I think the supposition is clear with the deacons. The deacon's
wives will help the deacons in their deaconing. So while the
deacon is tasked with the service of the table of the Lord, the
table of the poor, and the table of the minister, a deacon's wife
is very valuable and very helpful in that threefold pursuit. For
instance, if there is a woman that is abused, or there's some
sort of a situation that requires the soft touch of a woman, it
ought to be the deacon's wife, perhaps, instead of the deacon.
So the apostle gives illustration, or gives rather qualification,
for deacon's wives. And again, very evident, very
obvious, very patent. Likewise, their wives must be
reverent, not slanderers, temperate, faithful in all things. So that's
his domestic faithfulness relative to his wife, but then he shares
the similar qualification as the elder with reference to his
children. Verse 12, let deacons be the
husbands of one wife, he's got to be proven in terms of sexual
fidelity, ruling their children and their own houses well. and
that it ends with a wonderful commendation to those men who
serve and function in the capacity of the diaconate in a good way. Notice in verse 13, for those
who have served well as deacons obtain for themselves a good
standing and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ
Jesus. It is a wonderful work that the
Lord God has given in the context of the local church. It warms
my heart when we gather together for prayer meeting and brothers
pray for the deacons. As we saw intimately or wonderfully
over the last year, we saw the work of the deacons in ways that
they weren't necessarily ready for, but they stepped up to the
plate, they swung the bat and they hit home runs. And I bless
God for those brothers. I bless God for their work. And
I bless God for the privilege of working alongside of them. So brethren, pray for them. Pray
with reference to men in our church. If you have somebody
in mind, please send me an email. Please send me a text. An email
is better because then I can print it out and put it in a
folder. I like doing that. But if you want to, please communicate
in light of the qualifications for elders and for deacons what
man or men in the context of our church you see fits the bill. And by God's grace, we will hopefully
install a man or men for his glory, for the progress of the
kingdom of Christ on earth. Because it was when they were
installed that the word of the Lord spread. and a great many
came to the faith, including the inveterate enemies of the
gospel, those priests who had shaken their fist at the glorious
Christ and now were submitting on bended knee, confessing him
as Lord and Savior. Well, let us pray. Our Father
in heaven, we thank you for your word. We thank you for its clarity
in these church matters. And we thank you for the men
who serve in our church in this manner. We give praise to you,
Lord God, for their faithfulness, and we pray that you would continue
to bless them and watch over them. As well, God, we pray to
you as the Lord of the harvest to raise up elders, to raise
up deacons, not just in our church. We know that Mike has needs.
We see for Vernon, we pray for Ryan and that whole situation
there, that there would be not just him one day, but a plurality.
We pray for the situation in Dryden. We thank you for the
plurality of men in terms of eldership in the church in Honduras.
And we know that this is indeed the mind of Christ. So God help
us and grant us grace and give us this kind provision. And we
ask in the name and for the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.
We'll close with a brief time of meditation.