← Back to sermon library
Well, you can turn with me in
your Bibles to Matthew chapter 7. Matthew chapter 7. This is a bit of extended application
from the message this morning. Remember the Jews accused Jesus
of being demon possessed and In that particular context, he
defends himself, he refutes them by pointing out his miracle wrought
in Bethesda. He appeals to Moses to show that
what he had done was not an infraction or transgression of the law.
And then he laid down that principle concerning judgment. He says
in John 7, 24, do not judge according to appearance, but judge with
righteous judgment. So that'd be helpful for us to
look at Matthew 7, verses one to five. I'll read the passage
and then we'll pray. Judge not that you be not judged, for with
what judgment you judge, you will be judged. And with the
measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look
at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the
plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother,
let me remove the speck from your eye, and look, a plank is
in your own eye. Hypocrite, first remove the plank
from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the
speck from your brother's eye. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our
Father in heaven, we thank you for the Word of God. We thank
you that it's given by inspiration of you. It's profitable for doctrine,
reproof, correction, and for instruction in righteousness.
And certainly, this passage addresses a tendency in all of your people,
in all of creation, to have a judgmental attitude and spirit with reference
to others. Give us wisdom concerning what
the text says and means, and help us, God, by the power and
the presence of the Holy Spirit. to put these things into practice
in our own daily lives, to bring glory to you in a manner that
is consistent with your revelation. Forgive us now for our sin and
unrighteousness, cleanse us afresh in that precious blood of the
Lamb, and God, fill us now with your Holy Spirit, and we pray
through Jesus Christ our Lord, amen. Well, this is part of the
Sermon on the Mount. Of course, the Lord Jesus goes
up onto a mountain and there he teaches. And we have all kinds
of people drawing eye to him. There's those who are unconverted.
And so he preaches in a manner to show them the law and to show
them their need for him. But as well, his disciples are
attending also. So he is instructing the Christian
in how he ought to live concerning his life before a holy God. And
here in verses 1 to 5, he is making a prohibition against
judgmentalism. As I mentioned this morning,
he is not saying there is never to be judgment. This is one of
those misunderstood passages that we have in the Bible. In
fact, Pastor Kirkpatrick in Surrey, I think, preached this one this
morning. He's doing a summer series on
commonly misunderstood Bible texts. In Matthew 7, one to five
is certainly one of them. So I wanna look first at the
prohibition itself in verse one, secondly, the explanation in
verse two, and then thirdly, the illustration in verses three
to five. So let's look first at the prohibition. And there's a few things I wanna
consider. First, the abuse of the text. I think J.C. Ryle,
hits the nail on the head when he says, the first portion of
these verses is one of those passages of scripture which we
must be careful not to strain beyond its proper meaning. It
is frequently abused and misapplied by the enemies of true religion.
It is possible to press the words of the Bible so far that they
yield not medicine but poison. How many times have we heard
this text bandied about to try and teach that there ought never
to be judgment? Oh, you Christians are so judgmental. Your own Bible says you're not
supposed to judge. Well, again, we need to properly
understand what Jesus is addressing so that we can understand this
text and understand this emphasis on judgment throughout Scripture.
Now, in terms of the scope of the text, notice in verse one,
judge not that you be not judged. If we lifted that out of the
context, if we lifted it out of the Bible, if it was the only
statement regarding judgment, then perhaps the opponents of
Christianity would be right. Judge not that you be not judged. It's so simple and so obvious. You're never supposed to ever
render any kind of judgment whatsoever. You see, the issue is that this
text is not disconnected from the rest of the Bible. It's not
disconnected from the books of Genesis to Revelation. This text
is consistent with biblical teaching all throughout, and so we need
to understand it in that larger context. So this cannot mean
that a Christian is to never exercise judgment in the world. And I want to just give you various
examples wherein it is right and where it is necessary for
Christians to offer judgment. In the first place, look at the
next verse, verse 6. Do not give what is holy to the
dogs, nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them
under their feet and turn and tear you in pieces. Brethren,
that's a judgment call. At some point in our evangelism
of a particular sinner, we ought to conclude that they're either
a dog or a pig and no longer cast our pearls before them.
We are not to continue in a pattern of abuse or to, as far as we're
able to, live at peace with all men, as Paul says in Romans chapter
12. But if a man is an expressed
enemy of the gospel of our blessed Lord, after several attempts,
after trying to win him over, after trying to argue him into
the kingdom or tell him the truth, there is that emphasis that Jesus
says, do not give what is holy to the dogs, nor cast your pearls
before swine. He's not talking about actual
canines. He's not talking about actual
pigs. He is talking about human beings
that display those characteristics. that are at odds with the God
of the scriptures, that are at odds with the people of God,
and that are not to be entreated. And so there is a judgment involved
in the fact that we are called to judge who may be a dog or
a pig. Secondly, we are called to judge
in matters of doctrinal orthodoxy. Look at Matthew 7 at verse 15.
Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep's clothing,
but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. That's a judgment call. How do we discriminate? How do
we understand? How do we identify that? Well,
we hold them up to the scripture. We judge them in light of the
scripture. We judge their prophesying, their
teaching, their preaching in light of God's holy truth. If
they come up short, if they are wanting, if they are lacking,
then we judge them to be false prophets. Notice in verse 16,
you will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thorn
bushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears
good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot
bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree
that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the
fire. Therefore, by their fruits you will know them. By their
fruits you will be able to judge them, you will be able to discern,
you will be able to understand where they're coming from, and
if they are false prophets, have no truck with them. Turn over
to the book of Galatians, another place where we see that we're
called to judge in matters of doctrinal orthodoxy. In Galatians
chapter 1 at verse 6, the apostle comes out of the gate and he
says, I marvel that you are turning away so soon from him who called
you in the grace of Christ to a different gospel, which is
not another. But there are some who trouble you and want to pervert
the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from
heaven preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached
to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now
I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than
what you have received, let him be a curse. But Paul, that sounds
judgmental. Absolutely, positively, it is
judgmental. We are not to let heretics into
Christian pulpits and distort the doctrine of justification
by faith alone. We're to chase them out. We're
to have no truck with them. We're not to listen to them.
We are to refuse and reject them. That is a judgment call. Turn
over the book of Philippians, Philippians chapter 3. Philippians
chapter 3 verse 1, Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord.
For me to write the same things to you is not tedious, but for
you it is safe. Beware of dogs. Again, he's not
arguing, he's not warning you against the canine down the street.
He's not suggesting that pit bulls are always violent and
dangerous and they're going to chew you up and they're going
to chew your children up. No, the Judaizers, or rather
the Jews, would refer to Gentiles as dogs. So Paul takes up this
moniker and describes the Judaizers, those who want to add works to
faith, he calls them dogs. Notice verse two, beware of dogs,
beware of evil workers, beware of the mutilation, those who
are seeking to get you to be circumcised in order to complete
the transaction betwixt you and God. This is a judgment call,
brethren, and if persons say, well, that's not kind, that's
not loving, that's not fair, we are to judge in the manner
that God calls us to. Turn over to the book of Revelation,
Revelation chapter 2, the church in Ephesus, the first letter
to the seven churches of Asia Minor. They are commended by
Christ for having rendered judgment. We often remember the church
at Ephesus for their problem, which was leaving their first
love, but we don't often remember what they're commended for, and
we should. Notice in 2.1, to the angel of
the church of Ephesus write, these things says he who holds
the seven stars in his right hand, who walks in the midst
of the seven golden lampstands. I know your works, your labor,
your patience, and that you cannot bear those who are evil, which
in and of itself is a judgment call. We're rendering the verdict
that these persons are evil and therefore we're going to avoid
that. But he escalates it. Notice,
and you have tested those who say they are apostles and are
not and have found them liars. And you have persevered and have
patience and have labored for my name's sake and have not become
weary. So going back to Matthew 7, judge
not, that you be not judged is not a universal statement. It
is conditioned, it is contextual, it is in the life or in the orbit
of the rest of God's Word. In a third manner, we are called
to judge in matters of church discipline. So not only orthodoxy
with reference to sound doctrine, but orthopraxy with reference
to life and practice in Christ's church. Turn over to Matthew
chapter 18. There we see detailed instruction
on how to deal with somebody that has sinned against us. Now
I know the default position in the church is to avoid them,
to never have any dealings with them again, but that's not God's
Word. That is not the command of Scripture.
We're supposed to fix our relationships. If we go to the altar and there
we want to present our gift, and we remember that somebody
has a problem with us, we go fix that relationship. Because
what happens horizontally affects the vertical relationship with
God. And in the same token, if somebody sins against me, I'm
not to just avoid them, I'm not just to write them off, I'm not
just to think in my own head, they're dead to me and I'm not
going to have any dealings with them. No, I need to man up and
do what God Most High commands me to do and I need to go after
them such that they can repent of their sin and have a right
relationship horizontally and thus vertically. This is a judgment
call. Notice in 1815. Moreover, if
your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between
you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained
your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or
two more, that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every
word may be established. And if he refuses to hear them,
what do you think they're doing? They're rendering a judgment.
They're witnessing the process. They have heard the events and
details, and they are saying, yeah, this guy is unrepentant.
This guy has found wanting. This guy is not doing what he's
supposed to do. So notice in verse 17, and if
he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses
even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen
and a tax collector. That's a judgment. We render
a judgment upon a sinning brother that does not repent. We treat
him like a heathen and a tax collector. You see this in 1
Corinthians 5 as well. The apostle upbraids the Corinthian
church because there was an instance of a man who had his father's
wife. And the apostle says, you knew
about this and you were arrogant about it? Paul says, get him
out of the midst. If he's unrepentant, remove him
from the life and context of the local church. That is a judgment
call. Fourth, we are called to judge
in matters concerning the sins of the eldership. Turn over to
1 Timothy chapter 5. Again, focusing on what the text
does not teach. It does not teach that there
ought never to be any sort of judgment rendered whatsoever.
We are called to judge who may be a dog or a pig. We are called
to judge in matters of doctrinal orthodoxy. We are called to judge
in matters of church discipline. We are called to judge in matters
concerning sins in the eldership. Look at 1 Timothy 5, 17. Let
the elders who rule well be counted worthy of double honor, especially
those who labor in the word and doctrine. For the scripture says
you shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain, and
the laborer is worthy of his wages. do not receive an accusation
against an elder except from two or three witnesses. Again,
what's in view? There's a judgment call that's
going to be made upon this particular elder. It must be done with due
process. It must be done in the light
of biblical redemption. It must be done in light of the
laws of witnesses in Deuteronomy 17 and 19. And then notice what
happens in verse 20. Those who are sinning rebuke
in the presence of all that the rest also may fear. That's a
judgment, brethren, that the church renders on a sinning elder. And then finally, we are called
to judge in civil disputes, both in the church and in the civil
sphere. Turn back to 1 Corinthians 6.
1 Corinthians 6, just to see an emphasis on the judgment that
the church is supposed to render when there is a dispute among
brothers within that church. Notice in 1 Corinthians 6, one,
dare any of you having a matter against another, go to law before
the unrighteous and not before the saints. Do you not know that
the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged
by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Do you
not know that we shall judge angels? How much more things
that pertain to this life? If then you have judgments concerning
things pertaining to this life, do you appoint those who are
least esteemed by the church to judge? I say this to your
shame. Is it so that there is not a
wise man among you, not even one who will be able to judge
between his brethren? But brother goes to law against
brother, and that before unbelievers. Don't go to the pagan judge,
don't go to the heathen. Rather, the church ought to be
able to render sufficient judgment in these particular matters.
So again, an odd emphasis by the Apostle Paul, if judge not
lest you be judged, is a universal statement that requires never
judging anyone. And then of course, Romans chapter
13. Romans chapter 13, verses 1 to 4. Let every soul be subject
to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except
from God, and those which exist are appointed by God. Therefore,
whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God,
and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers
are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be
unafraid of the authority? Do it as good, and you will have
praise from the same. For he is God's minister to you
for good, but if you do evil, be afraid. For he does not bear
the sword in vain, for he is God's minister and avenger to
execute wrath on him who practices evil." Now brethren, generally
this applies, right? Civil government has the right
and prerogative given to it by God to render judgment. and then
to punish in light of that violation of law up to and including the
death penalty. Christians can function as civil
magistrates. We're not Anabaptists. If you
get a job in the civil government and your job is to render judgment,
God's not at war with you. That is not a problematic situation. That is not something that he
will say is a wicked endeavor on the part of God's people.
What we have in Matthew 7 verse 1 is not an unqualified and universal
prohibition to never engage in judgment. We've just seen the
opposite. It is rather a prohibition against a particular activity
that we are all prone to do when dealing with our brothers in
Christ. He's condemning judgmentalism. He is condemning our everyday
conduct with one another. That's the context of the Sermon
on the Mount. Turn back to Matthew chapter
5 to see the Sermon on the Mount in this way. Notice in chapter
5 verses 38 to 42. You have heard that it was said,
an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. But I tell you not
to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your
right cheek, turn the other to him also. If anyone wants to
sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also.
And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him too. Give
to him who asks you and from him who wants to borrow from
you, do not turn away. This is not a prohibition against
locking your front door. It's not a prohibition against
telling a criminal offender that I'm not going to allow you to
rape my wife or my daughters. The common understanding or misunderstanding
of this text would do away with locks, would do away with guard
dogs, would do away with alarm systems. I mean, after all, we're
supposed to turn the other cheek, right? You're done with my daughter,
the wife is down at the end of the hallway. That's not what's
in view. It is a petty, vindictive, judgmental
spirit in day-to-day life that was exhibited by the Pharisees
and the scribes. The religious people are the
ones that Jesus has issues with in the Sermon on the Mount. with
reference to everyday ethics. Yeah, as far as you're able,
don't be vindicatory. Don't be a petty, judgmental
individual. Don't be that person that's always
exacting a pound of flesh. But if you are brutally assaulted,
if you are mugged on the way home from church tonight, which
I hope doesn't happen, Jesus doesn't condemn you calling the
RCMB. Jesus doesn't condemn you sitting
with the artist that's going to sketch out a picture of the
bad guy. And Jesus doesn't condemn you
if you go into court and you swear and tell the whole truth
concerning this particular barbarian, and he ends up getting thrown
in prison or executed. Christ is not at war with that.
Christ is at war with the kind of judgmental spirit exhibited
by the Pharisees and oftentimes exhibited by God's people in
churches today. Calvin says these words of Christ
do not contain an absolute prohibition from judging. but are intended
to cure a disease which appears to be natural to us all. We see
how all flatter themselves, and every man passes as a fair censure
on others. This vice is attended by some
strange enjoyment, for there is hardly any person who is not
tickled with the desire of inquiring into other people's faults."
It's a fault-finding methodology that Christ is denouncing. You
see that again in verse 5. Hypocrite, first remove the plank
from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the
speck from who? From your brother's eye. This
has to do with your daily interpersonal relationships. It has nothing
to do with the rendering of a judgment by the church in an ecclesiastical
setting on a man's doctrinal unorthodoxy or heterodoxy or
heresy or his continual patterns of sin. It has nothing to do
with that. So if a church excommunicates
a sinful offender, it is not legit for outsiders to, well,
that's not right. You're not supposed to judge.
You have no understanding whatsoever of what the Bible says, and yet
you're gonna try to beat us up with Bible verses that you don't
know? Now, in terms of the meaning
of the text, very clearly, the command forbids a nitpicking,
fault-finding, petty approach to our brother's shortcomings. Judge not that you be not judged. Again, we see this in the illustration
in verses four and five, or three to five. And why do you look
at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the
plank in your own eye? That is a nitpicky, petty, fault-finding
mindset. It's inconsistent with that principle
of love in 1 Corinthians 13, 7. Love bears all things, it
believes all things, it hopes all things, it endures all things. And the mandate given by the
Apostle Paul in Colossians 3, 13, bearing with one another
and forgiving one another. See, the Apostle says that we're
supposed to forgive one another even as God in Christ forgave
us. If God has forgiven us of a multitude
of sin and transgression, we ought to be forgiving toward
our brethren. Now, again, there may be those instances where
we have to employ Matthew 18, but for the most part, brethren,
we can let love cover a multitude of sins. That is a legitimate
option that presents itself to the people of God that will hopefully
protect us from the mindset that is condemned here. Again, Ryle
says, what our Lord means to condemn is a censorious and fault-finding
spirit, a readiness to blame others for trifling offenses
or matters of indifference, a habit of passing rash and hasty judgments,
a disposition to magnify the errors and infirmities of our
neighbors and make the worst of them. This is what our Lord
forbids. It was common among the Pharisees. Osborne adds this, he says, the
key component is the absence of love. So the command is contextually
conditioned by the reality that on your day-to-day life, you're
not supposed to be the fault-finding, censorious person that imitates
the Pharisees instead of has God's Word lodged in their hearts. So the prohibition is not universal,
it is not unconditional, but rather it finds itself in the
context of the larger emphasis in Scripture. Now back to verse
1, judge not that you be not judged. Look at chapter 7 and
verse 12. Therefore whatever you want men
to do to you, do also to them, for this is the law and the prophets.
We call that the golden rule. And it goes man to man. How I
want to be treated, I should treat you. How I don't want to
be treated, I shouldn't treat you that way. Well, the judgment
in verse 1, judge not that you be not judged, it doesn't mean
horizontally. It means God work. And as we
move through this particular passage, that's the one who brings
chastening upon the brother that engages in this particular sin.
And that's a great sort of a stimulus, isn't it? Judge not that you
be not judged. Don't be the nitpicker. Don't
be the fault finder. Don't be the Pharisee. Don't
be the guy that has to see himself as the policeman for every single
individual in the life of Christ's holy church. That's not your
job. That's not your area of competence.
That is not what you have been called to do. And understand
that if that is the tack that you take, you will be judged
for it by God most high. That right there should lead
all of us to consider and ponder the emphasis in the text so that
we don't fall prey to engaging in an abuse of our place. Now
notice secondly, the explanation, the explanation that he gives.
So he gives a prohibition, verse one, judge not that you be not
judged. And then in verse two, four,
with what judgment you judge, you will be judged. And with
the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. Notice
the standard of judgment. We saw this this morning. Jesus
says in John 7, 24, do not judge according to appearance, but
judge with righteous judgment. That text itself assumes that
we will judge. That text assumes and commands
that we judge. It just demands that we judge
in a manner that is consistent with God's holy word, that we
judge with a righteous judgment. It's not our feelings. It's not
our emotions. It's not our offense. It's not,
oh, we don't like that. It's what God's word has to say. That's the standard of judgment
that we are to employ in the various ways we are called to
judge. And with reference to interpersonal relationships,
we're not supposed to do it at all. fault-finding, nitpicking,
petty approaches to our neighbor. So the prohibition in John 7,
24, do not judge according to appearance. I cited a few passages. Exodus 23, don't give deference
to a poor man in your courtroom. Judge him based on the facts
of the case. Don't give deference to a rich
man in your courtroom. Judge him with reference to the
facts of the case. And then the several emphases
in the Old Testament and New that God does not show partiality. I cited a particular commentator. He says, to show partiality in
a judgment is not to give a judgment that is just because of love
or deference or fear or the status of a person, which things have
nothing to do with the case. That doesn't, I mean, if you
love somebody, that doesn't change the contours of the case. As
lovers of God and lovers of men, we want justice to be served.
And so we don't defer, or we don't prefer, or we don't engage
in partiality. So that's what Christ is saying
here. He says in verse two, for with what judgment you judge,
you will be judged. And I take that as by God. And
with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.
It doesn't mean that God's going to enter into a nitpicking, fault-finding,
petty attitude. But He is going to judge you
based on that particular sin that you undertake on your own
behalf. In other words, when you violate
God's holy law, expect judgment, expect chastisement. Expect God
to come to deal with you. That's the focus in verse 2. For with what judgment you judge,
you will be judged. If you're a nitpicking, fault-finding,
petty individual that Jesus is denouncing here, judgment is
going to come your way. And with the measure you use,
it will be measured back to you. You get rid of the Word of God,
you let your preferences reign supreme, you let feelings and
emotions call the day. Well, then God is going to deal
with you, not that way, but according to His law, against the sin that
you have undertaken. And then notice, thirdly, the
illustration in verses 3 to 5. Now, this illustration is typical
of our blessed Lord. He used kind of hyperbolic things
to illustrate points. Remember in Matthew 23, when
he's upbraiding the scribes and the Pharisees, and he says, you
strain out the gnat, but you swallow the camel. Brethren,
I have to believe somebody in the crowd smiled. I have to believe
that somebody in the crowd got tickled when he said that. You
can envision it. You can see it. You can see these
Pharisees trying to strain their wine because they didn't want
any impurities in there. And so they take great pains
to make sure not a little gnat falls into their wine. And yet
you swallow the camel? Again, brethren, he uses that
hyperbole to illustrate the point. And he does the same thing here
masterfully. Notice what he says in verses
three to five. First, you have the illustration
proper. Verse three, why do you look
at the speck, the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye, but do
not consider the plank or the log in your own eye? Now, that right in and of itself
should give all of us cause to pause. This type of fault finding
takes effort on the part of the fault finder. Certainly, you
have better things to do than look for specks in your brother's
eyes, don't you? Yes, possibly. You see, this
takes effort to be this kind of a sinner. It actually means
more work than just obeying Jesus at this particular point. This
type of fault finding is a betrayal of the law of liberty. James
invokes the law of liberty in James 2, 12, and 13 in a context
dealing with partiality. He says specifically, so speak
and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty.
For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.
Thirdly, with reference to the illustration proper, why do you
look at the speck in your brother's eye but do not consider the plank
in your own eye? This type of fault finding is
a rejection of biblical procedure. You're not supposed to do this.
You're supposed to understand that when it comes to matters,
not only in the law courts, But when it comes to matters in our
daily interaction, one with another, Proverbs 18, 17 is binding upon
all men everywhere. The first to plead his cause
seems right until his neighbor comes and examines him. Earlier
in Proverbs 18, he says, he who answers a matter before he hears
it, this is folly, it is wickedness. And so you're going after the
speck in your brother's eye, all the while you've got a beam.
You've got a log, you've got a pole hanging out of your eye. It is absolutely ludicrous that
we engage in this sort of thing. Fourth, this type of fault finding
is a failure to come to grips with one's own shortcomings,
failures, and sins. The guy with the speck understands
your issue, but you don't understand it. You've got a beam hanging
out of your eye, and you've come after him for a piece of sawdust
in his eye. Okay, let's deal with the sawdust,
brother, but let's deal with that beam. Let's try to extricate
that log that's hanging out of your eye that you're swinging
around indiscriminately at everybody around us. John Stott says we
have a fatal tendency to exaggerate the faults of others and minimize
the gravity of our own sin. Yeah, that's absolutely positively
true. And then screw tape to Wormwood
in C.S. Lewis's book, Screw Tape Letters.
He says, aggravate that most useful human characteristic,
the horror and neglect of the obvious. The guy's got a pole
hanging out of his eye, right? He says you must bring him to
a condition in which he can practice self-examination for an hour
without discovering any of those facts about himself which are
perfectly clear to anyone who has ever lived in the same house
with him or worked in the same office. That is what this text
is dealing with, this fault-finding, nitpicking attitude where you've
got bigger issues than the person you're actually coming after.
And then oftentimes, this type of fault-finding may involve
what psychologists call projection. I'm gonna come after the sawdust
that's in your eye, all the while neglecting the log that's in
my own. They both come from the same
place, brethren. They both come from the same
tree. And so with reference to this, it is absolutely ludicrous,
and Jesus condemns it by way of this illustration. Notice
he then makes this indictment based on this illustration. Verse
five, he says, hypocrite. Hypocrite, now that is applied
to unbelievers in chapter 6, 2, 5, and 16. So in chapter 6, 2, 5, and 16,
it's applied to unbelievers, but it's not confined to them.
Jesus calls these nitpicking fault finders, these censorious
souls, these do-gooders for all that is good and holy when it
comes to the policing of sawdust, but have no concern whatsoever
with reference to beams. He calls them hypocrites. Spurgeon
says, Jesus is gentle, but he calls that man a hypocrite who
fusses about small things and others and pays no attention
to great matters at home in his own person. Why do you look at
the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank
in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother,
let me remove the speck from your eye and look, a plank is
in your own eye? Imagine going for eye surgery,
and your eye surgeon happened to be blind. That might give
you cause to reflect. This isn't the best place for
me. Or perhaps you are able to go to Arizona, and you're going
to go visit the Grand Canyon. And you're going to shell out
the dough to get the guy to tour down to the bottom of the canyon.
And the guy shows up with his team of burros, and he happens
to be blind. And he says, saddle up, partner.
We're going to shimmy down right into the bottom of the canyon.
I'd say, nah, I don't think so, man. I am not going to do this.
I wouldn't trust a blind man to pack my parachute. I wouldn't
trust a blind man to fly my plane. And with reference to a blind
man doing eye surgery on me, nope, not going to happen. Again,
that's a judgment call, too. Judge not, lest you be judged.
I'll take the effort on that one, or I'll take the liability
on that one. Do you see what Jesus is saying?
You got this beam hanging out of your eye, and you're coming
over here and saying, brother, let me get that sawdust out of
your eye. That is hypocrisy. Now notice the corrective in
verse five. Hypocrite, first remove the plank
from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the
speck from your brother's eye. Now there's a couple of ways
that this could go. The plank has a general reference
to sin. deal with your own sin, so you're
in a right posture to deal with the sins of others. That doesn't
mean you're sinlessly perfect. It doesn't mean you're without
blemish. It doesn't mean you're wholly harmless and undefiled.
But in terms of a general comportment and pursuit of holiness, you
got it together. And so you're in a better position
to police the sawdust in the eyes of your lesser fellows. Or the plank has a specific reference
to the attitude condemned in verses one and two. You're a
nitpicker, you're a fault finder. If the goal is to try to fix
your brother's eye, it's not good to have sawdust in the eye
either. It's a good corrective, it's a good help, it's a good
ministry for us to undertake. It's just hypocritical when you
happen to have a log hanging out of your eye. And so the emphasis
may be on deal with yourself in this particular way, and then
come to your brother in a spirit of gentleness and love. Lloyd-Jones
says if you really do want to help others, and to help rid
them of these blemishes and faults, and frailties and imperfections,
First of all, realize that your spirit and your whole attitude
has been wrong. This spirit of judging and hypercriticism
and censoriousness that is in you is really like a beam contrasted
with a little mote in the other person's eye. Again, most of
us are open to correction. I hope we're God's people. We're
blood-bought. We have the Holy Spirit. we hopefully
will say with a hearty amen the proverb that says, faithful are
the wounds of a friend. So when a friend comes to us,
a brother comes to us, a wife comes to us, a husband comes
to us, it's not always easy initially to hear that, but hey, they're
after my good. They want my betterment. They
want my growth and grace. They want me to live a sawdust-free
life. That's a blessing. But if their
attitude is one of censoriousness and nitpickiness and pettiness
and judgmentalness that is absolutely offensive, I'm okay with dishonest
in my eye. I'm going to be all right with
that. In verse 5, while it is possible that the critic here
is to be understood as aware of his own failings but concealing
them, it is more likely that he is criticized for failing
to apply the same standards to himself that he applies to others,
like David in his response to Nathan's parable in 2 Samuel
12. Remember that? Oh, David is incensed. David is outraged. David wants
the death penalty for that rich man who took the little ewe lamb
from that poor man and he cooked him up and barbecued him so that
his friends would have something to eat. Oh, David's just incensed
and outraged. He says, and thus being aware
of the inconsistency of his behavior. The tendency is there to never
deal with anyone else's sin because we're cowards. But when we do
deal with other people's sins, let us do it from the posture
of not having a beam hanging out of our eyes when we come
to correct the sawdust eye of our fellows. In conclusion, first
of all, the manifestation of judgmentalism, that's what's
condemned. It's judgmentalism. It's not
the idea of judging in those contexts specified earlier. The
origin of this particular sin, it's Adam and our condition in
Adam, but even as believers, we have remaining corruption.
And typically, it's pride. Typically, it's arrogance. Typically,
it's virtue signaling. Typically, it's a better than
thou attitude that we manifest. And it's manifested particularly
in pettiness, fault finding, being hypercritical. Brethren,
it's tough to live under a hypercritical situation. Parents, remember
this particular task as you're rearing your children. Yes, lay
down the law of God. Yes, lay down the rules that
you have instituted in your home. But understand, brethren, that
a hypercritical spirit is something that exacerbates people, exasperates
people. Excessive eagerness, curiosity,
and peevishness. Secondly, the gravity of judgmentalism,
the gravity of this particular sentence. It's very curious to
me that in the context of a local church, if a brother stood up
in a prayer meeting and said, you know, I went out and visited
a prostitute last night, we'd be outraged and we'd call for
church discipline. Or a brother stood up and he
said, you know, Jesus is a creature, the watchtower is right. I'm
gonna deny the triunity of God most high. We would be incensed
and outraged. And yet judgmentalism, it's just
part and parcel of church life. It's just the way it is. It's
right there with gossip. It's right there with slander.
It's right there with that hypercritical attitude. Somehow that doesn't,
you know, get on our radar screen in terms of those things that
we condemn and show outrage concerning. But with reference to the gravity,
it is the arrogant assertion of authority over others. Who
made you the judge and jury over other people? Solomon says, keep
your heart with all diligence, for out of it spring the issues
of life. I don't know of a proverb by Solomon where he says, keep
the heart of your fellows with all diligence, for out of it
spring the issues of life. They need your constant surveillance
to make sure they're always on the alert. Secondly, it is an
expression of self-righteousness, isn't it? You got a beam in your
eye and you're coming after the sawdust of other. I think there's
problems there and those problems are self-righteousness. It is
thirdly, a demonstration of a lack of charity. It's not loving to
do it in that manner. Again, it's good to be the sawdust
extractor from the eyes of your brethren if you do it in a spirit
that is charitable, if you're doing it with a remedial attitude.
If you're just criticizing incessantly your wife or your husband to
the point where they want to go live on a roof or live out
in the wilderness, that's not the right attitude or the right
spirit. And then as well, it is a practical
denial of the doctrine of remaining corruption. The doctrine of remaining
corruption, while we don't justify sin, while we don't justify sadost
in the eyes, we understand that that will always be the case.
It's like Jesus said concerning the poor. The poor you will always
have. On this side of heaven, the remaining
corruption, we will always have. And then finally, the prevention
of judgmentalism. And this isn't, you know, Jim
Butler guru giving you all the things that you should do. Just
some encouragements, some suggestions, some ideas to ponder so that
we guard against this idea of judgmentalism. I'd suggest, first
of all, we seek the gracious influence of the Holy Spirit.
If by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, then you
shall live. Romans chapter 8 and verse 13. We need the Holy Spirit, brethren.
He's the Holy Spirit. We're not. We need His influence. We need His gracious presence
in our lives to hopefully keep us from this attitude condemned
by our Lord. Secondly, seek to apply biblical
law to all matters of judgment. That's the reality. Do not judge
according to appearance. to whims, to preferences, to
emotions, to dreams. No, you judge with righteous
judgment, which is the word of the living and true God. Thirdly,
pursue humility and kill pride. The pursuit of humility by killing
pride is a helpful way to minimize the logs so that you can deal
faithfully with the sawdust, or so that you can minimize the
tendency or the temptation to engage in this kind of fault-finding
endeavor. And then fourthly, understand
the biblical doctrine of sin and how it is true of you. You and I have remaining corruption. You and I may have a tendency
or proclivity, I don't want to offend, but we could actually
have some self-righteousness in us. We could actually have
a judgmental attitude in us. We could actually be the fault-finding
nitpickers that Jesus here condemns. We need to understand the limitations
of our own heart that we may not be the best police officer
to go about on this particular task. We need to understand remaining
corruption in ourselves. Spurgeon said, instead of beholding
with gratified gaze the small fault of another, we should act
reasonably if we penitently consider the greater fault of ourselves.
But then, fifthly, understand the biblical doctrine of sin
or remaining corruption and how it is true. of others, right? Are we demanding something that
we ourselves can never pony up? That was the problem with the
Pharisees. They lay burdens upon you that
they themselves cannot carry. It is absolutely crucial that
we not only understand that we're in this boat of remaining corruption
ourselves, but so are our wives, so are our husbands. A child
who confesses faith in our Lord Jesus doesn't go through some
time warp and start exhibiting himself as 30. He's still gonna
be childish. He's still gonna have foolishness
in him. Oh, how could you ever claim
to be a Christian? Brethren, guard against that
tendency. There is remaining corruption
here, there is remaining corruption there, and we do well to remember
that of our fellows. And then I would suggest finally,
value, esteem, and love your brother. Value, esteem, and love
your brother. Don't be a judge or a hypocrite,
but be a brother. Encourage, love, exhort, be kind. If it is something that you feel
constrained to go to them, go with the spirit of gentleness
and affection and with a genuine desire to see them won for our
Lord Jesus Christ, not in this sort of celebratory manner. Wow,
I can't believe, you know, smirk, smirk, giggle, giggle, that you
actually did that. I can't understand that. I'm
just so holy and righteous and pure and I've never done that.
That's the attitude that Christ herein condemns. And so by God's
grace, may we conduct ourselves in a manner that is consistent
with his word. I suggest it sins at this level. that oftentimes do far more damage
in the churches of Jesus Christ than does a minister or a person
standing up and saying, you know, let's just all deny the deity
of Jesus and become Unitarians. Let's all deny the deity of Jesus
and become Arians. No, that's usually, I mean, it
happens to be sure, but it's this kind of a mindset. It's
this kind of an attitude. It's gossipy, slanderous, judgmental
people that do positive harm and destruction to the churches
of Christ. Let us deal with our own logs
before we go to the sawdust of others. to praise God for Christ
because we're going to sin. We are going to be nitpicky.
We are going to be judgmental. Perhaps you're thinking now,
man, I did this to my wife or I said this to my husband. I
kind of do this on a regular basis. I really need to stop.
Well, you're not going to go to heaven because you stop. I
mean, you certainly need to stop, because if you don't, that evidence
is that you've never come to the Savior. But we go to heaven
based on the fact that Christ never sinned this sin, that Christ
was not nitpicking, that Christ was not petty, that Christ was
not a fault finder in the manner that He condemns in this particular
passage. It is His righteousness, it is
His death, it is His resurrection by which we stand. So not to
minimize the import of the tax, to call us to a pursuit of those
things that are pleasing in a sight, but at the end of the day, let
us rejoice in the gospel of our salvation. Well, let us pray.
Father, we thank you for your Word, we thank you for the clarity
and the consistency of it, and I pray that you'd give us ears
to hear and hearts to receive these things, and bless us and
our families, bless us as individuals, as a church, and help us to function
properly as citizens in civil society. We ask now that you
would go with us, that you would cause your face to shine upon
us, that we would know your peace and presence in our own hearts
and lives, and that you would keep us by your grace and for
your glory in the coming week. And we ask this through Jesus
Christ, our Lord. Amen. We'll close with a brief
time of meditation.