← Back to sermon library
Matthew chapter 26, our focus
will be verses 6 to 13, the anointing at Bethany. But I did want to
read verses 1 to 16. So beginning in Matthew chapter
26 at verse 1. Now it came to pass when Jesus
had finished all these sayings that he said to his disciples,
you know that after two days is the Passover and the Son of
Man will be delivered up to be crucified. Then the chief priests,
the scribes, and the elders of the people assembled at the palace
of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, and plotted to take
Jesus by trickery and kill him. But they said, not during the
feast, lest there be an uproar among the people. And when Jesus
was in Bethany at the house of Simon the leper, a woman came
to him having an alabaster flask of very costly fragrant oil,
and she poured it on his head as he sat at the table. But when
His disciples saw it, they were indignant, saying, Why this waste? For this fragrant oil might have
been sold for much and given to the poor. But when Jesus was
aware of it, He said to them, Why do you trouble the woman?
For she has done a good work for Me. For you have the poor
with you always, but Me you do not have always. For in pouring
this fragrant oil on My body, she did it for My burial. Assuredly,
I say to you, wherever this gospel is preached in the whole world,
what this woman has done will also be told as a memorial to
her. Then one of the 12, called Judas Iscariot, went to the chief
priest and said, what are you willing to give me if I deliver
him to you? And they counted out to him 30
pieces of silver. So from that time, he sought
opportunity to betray him. Amen. Well, let us pray. Father,
thank you for the written word of the living and true God. Thank
you for this passion narrative and what it tells us concerning
our Lord Jesus Christ. And certainly it answers questions
concerning how he would save his people from their sins and
what he meant in chapter 20, 28, when he says, the Son of
Man gave his life to ransom many. God, we thank you for this great
act, this great act of redemption brought out by the Lord Jesus
Christ for us men and for our salvation. We pray now that your
Spirit would guide and direct us. We pray that your Spirit
would draw from us further devotion and worship and love and adoration
to our Lord Jesus Christ. May we see and may we admire
this woman and may we indeed engage in likewise. And again,
forgive us now for our sin and we pray through Christ the Lord.
Amen. Well, as I said in prayer, this
Matthew chapters 26 to 28 is the passion narrative, and it's
the description of the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. And
as we embark on that, we're not going to go through the whole
thing, but I thought over the next several Lord's Supper services, we would
take our sermon material from this section of Matthew's gospel.
But as we look at this particular passage, it is intriguing because
we have conspiracy in verses 3 and 4. There's a conspiracy
on the part of the religious leaders to destroy Jesus. And
then you have betrayal by Judas Iscariot in verses 14 to 16.
So sandwiched between this conspiracy and betrayal, you have an act
of devotion. And when we look at the parallel
passages, there's a parallel in John's Gospel in John 12,
1-8, and there's a parallel in Mark 14 at verses 3-9. John tells us when this occurred,
and Matthew doesn't give us any indication concerning the timing,
which suggests that Matthew's sort of insertion of this narrative
here is more thematic and theological in nature. Some have suggested
that it sort of sets the stage or sets the tone for how we approach
the passion narrative. Devotion, worship, adoration,
appreciation for our Lord for what He has done for us in terms
of salvation. So I want to look at the devotion
of this particular woman under three considerations. First,
the anointing at Bethany in verses 6 and 7. Secondly, the complaint
of the disciples in verses 8 and 9. And then finally, the response
of our Lord Jesus Christ in verses 10 to 13. It's a very instructive
passage on the way that we should appreciate and go toward our
Savior, but it's also instructive with reference to discipleship.
We can have some issues, and we can have some challenges,
and I think it's represented here by these disciples and their
response to this woman. But in the first place, we ought
to appreciate the setting. As I said, the parallel passages
in Mark 14, we'll refer to that a little bit. There's a couple
of details in there that are not given to us here in Matthew,
and then John 12, one to eight. Now, what differences exist,
especially in John, can be harmonized. We're not going to spend a lot
of time on that. There's another instance of a similar type of
an anointing in Luke chapter 7. That woman, which was a sinner,
comes and anoints the Savior. But those are different accounts.
That happened in Galilee. This takes place in Bethany.
Bethany is just outside of Jerusalem on the east side. And in terms
of the chronology, up to this point, we've been on the Tuesday
of the Passion Week. Not a lot happens on Wednesday,
but then on Thursday, all sorts of things happen. But as I said,
this particular instance took place the previous Saturday,
and that's what John indicates for us. So again, that Matthew
puts it here. He wants us to spend some time
reflecting on the glory of the Savior and on the devotion requisite
to what the Savior's undergoing in terms of His cross work. Now,
the reference to Simon the leper here in verse 6, he had been
healed. If he had not been healed, then
they would not have been allowed to be near him. And the leper
doesn't sort of tar and feather him for life, but it distinguishes
him because Simon was a very popular and a very common name.
So they're in the house of Simon the leper. Now, in terms of the
setting, we ought to appreciate the woman, her identity. She
is Mary, the sister of Martha and Lazarus. We see that again
in John's gospel in John chapter 12. They lived in Bethany. This
is that Mary that we've seen, or that you see in Luke, that
is Bethany. busy worshiping the Savior, while her sister Martha
is busy serving the Savior, and Martha sort of complains about
that. So what we find here is characteristic of this woman. She is devoted to the Savior,
and she will spare no expense in demonstrating that devotion. And then note the particular
activity, what she does. Verse 7 tells us, a woman came
to him having an alabaster flask of very costly fragrant oil,
and she poured it on his head as he sat at the table. Now this
was a practice that was done in certain contexts. As I've
already said, Luke 7, that woman which was a sinner does a similar
thing. As well, the act is consistent with the anointing of kings.
1 Samuel chapter 16, Samuel anoints David as king. Also, the act
is interpreted by Christ as a preparation for his burial. And thus it confirms
what he's already announced in verse two. Look at it 26 too. He says, you know that after
two days is the Passover and the son of man will be delivered
up to be crucified. He interprets this act on her
part as preparation for his burial. So he's affirming the reality
of his own death. And this woman seems to understand
that as well. And therefore she pours out this
very costly and fragrant oil. But in the final analysis, what
this was, was a spontaneous act of extravagance directed to the
Lord of glory. It was a spontaneous act of extravagance
in terms of cost, in terms of value, in terms of price, such
that it causes these disciples to recoil with horror and even
severely or sharply criticize her. But it's an expression of
her worship, it's an expression of her devotion, it's an expression
to her evaluation of the Lord Jesus Christ. The oil, according
to John 12, 3, was worth 300 denarii. That is a year's salary
for a working man. Davies and Allison make this
observation. The high price contrasts sharply
with the low price Judas settles upon to betray Jesus. In the
following narrative, he bargains for 30 pieces of silver. Well,
she takes this 300 denarii worth of costly and fragrant oil, and
she pours it on his head. Now, that then dripped down onto
his body, which ultimately reached his feet. Because in John 12,
it tells us that she put the oil on his feet. Some say, well,
here it's head, and there it's feet. That's a contradiction.
No, typically oil is subject to the laws of gravity, just
like every other created material, such that if you put it on somebody's
head, it does naturally, and with that appropriate tendency,
go down the body and ultimately end up on the feet. So there
is no contradiction, there is utter consistency between the
narratives, but oftentimes what the authors are doing are highlighting
theological and thematic concerns. Now let's look secondly at the
complaint of the disciples. Notice what we have in verses
8 and 9. But when his disciples saw it,
they were indignant, saying, Why this waste? for this fragrant
oil might have been sold for much and given to the poor. Their
attitude, the extravagance of the woman's act was met with
a horrified response by these pragmatic disciples. Think about
it for just a moment. You're Jesus and you're sitting
there and this woman pours this costly oil upon your head. It
drips down to your body and ends up on your feet. And the people
that are closest to you say, why this waste? What do you mean,
why this waste? That is an indirect criticism
of the Lord Jesus Christ and a direct criticism of this particular
woman. Any devotion that we express
to the Savior is never a waste. Any extravagance that we spend
relative to the Savior is never a waste. Now, we need to be wise,
we need to be prudent, we need to be planners, we need to be
all of that, but this woman displays to us as well the reality that
we need to be abandoned with reference to the worship of our
Christ, that nothing is too good for Him, that nothing is too
glorious for Him, that He far surpasses any creaturely thing
that we can ever do in terms of our appreciation toward Him.
One wonders what these disciples would have thought in 1 Kings
6-8. 1 Kings 6-7 is the building of
Solomon's temple. As we went through that particular
narrative in our Wednesday night Bible study, we saw that the
very hinges of the door were made out of solid gold. Would
the disciples say, why this waste? Of course they wouldn't, because
they know Yahweh of Israel is worthy of such extravagance.
They, unlike this woman, had not yet appreciated that with
reference to Christ. They certainly loved him, they
were certainly followers of him, but in terms of giving up this
sort of a monetary gift to him, they weren't at that particular
place yet. So they, in their pragmatism,
they ask, why this waste? Now the parallel in John 12,
4 and 5 indicates that that came from Judas Iscariot. But from
Mark and from Matthew, we see that Judas' poison seeped into
the veins of these other men, and they are hypercritical of
this particular woman. Now note their complaint. The
question why this waste, as mentioned, is an indirect criticism of Jesus
himself and a direct criticism of the woman. Imagine if you're,
you know, somewhere, you go to somebody's house and you're sitting
at their table and, you know, the Persons of the house offer
you a piece of pie, and some of the family come later. Why
did you waste the pie on him? That would be a bit of a dig,
wouldn't you? You probably wouldn't want to munch that pie if you
thought you were the object of waste with reference to that
pie. I mean, this is subtle, brethren, but it's very poignant.
It's very pointed in terms of a dig, not only at the woman,
but at the Savior as well. And then note the reason or rationale
for their concern. Verse 8 tells us, when his disciples
saw it, they were indignant, saying, Why this waste? For this
fragrant oil might have been sold for much and given to the
poor. Again, this is not altogether
out of line. In fact, Jesus teaches in the
gospel records that we should remember the poor. Jesus indicates
that in Matthew chapter 19. Remember when he preaches the
law to that rich young ruler, he says, go sell everything you
have and give to the poor. Matthew 25, the Olivet Discourse,
and the very end, there's the sheep and the goats. Well, what
distinguishes the sheep and the goats in that particular situation? Sovereign grace. Before you answer
their works, remember sovereign grace. They were sheep and goats
when they appear before God Almighty. They were already sheep and they
were already goats. The external manifestation of
their choice having been chosen by God is good works done to
the least of these my brethren. So Jesus commands care for the
poor. Jesus commands that sort of kindness
to try to ameliorate the downtrodden and the poor, so there is a surface-level
reasonableness to their suggestion, but ultimately, they misunderstand
the scenario. And I think at this point, it's
very helpful to remind ourselves that Christ is not anti-social
justice. Now, those two words are very
powerful and very often employed in modern society. Perhaps you've
heard the words, social justice warrior. Well, if we ask the
Bible, is God concerned about justice in society? The answer
is yes. But the modern social justice
warrior, as they go about their good deeds, tend to have little
concern for the death of babies at the hands of abortionists.
They have little concern for the death of the elderly and
the infirm at the hands of murderous doctors and legislators. Social
justice today has more affinity, at least in some contexts, with
Karl Marx than it does with Jesus Christ. but just accepting for
a moment that Christ sanctions the practice of social justice,
which he does. He doesn't say, don't ever give
to the poor. He says, go ahead and give to the poor. The thing
that we as God's people need to keep in mind, that on the
one hand, yes, we have that second great commandment. commanded
to us that we love our neighbor as ourself. And an expression
of that oftentimes is engaging in what we'll call social justice,
trying to protect those who are defenseless, trying to help those
who are vulnerable, but not redistributing wealth and trying to sort of
form a utopian society. That's an odd, strange variant
of social justice-ism. But the point is, if we are engaged
in those sorts of doings, and we're not Forbidden from doing
that, we mustn't neglect devotion to Christ. You see this happen
with churches. Churches need to be relevant.
Churches need to speak to society. Churches need to go out and do
wonderful things. That's all good and well, as
long as the churches don't abandon the place of worship. They don't
abandon the place of the sacraments. They don't abandon the place
of the preaching of the word. That's our chief calling. The
other expressions of our love to fellow men are embedded in
us as well, but we ought never to do the one at the sacrifice
or expense of the other. And I think the tendency is extant
among Christians to be an either or. Either I'm gonna be the social
justice contender, or I'm gonna be engaged in acts of piety. Well, the Bible enforces upon
us, not an either or, but a both and. We're supposed to worship.
We're supposed to express extravagant displays of love and affection
for our Jesus. We're also supposed to try and
help people along the way. So they criticized this particular
woman. In fact, according to the parallel
in Mark 14, 5, they criticized her sharply. They were not pleased
whatsoever that she took this costly oil, worth 300 denarii,
and broke it over the head of the Savior. That upset them,
that provoked them, that evoked from them this complaint. Now,
the criticism of others concerning our use of time, money, or energy
in the service of the Savior ought not to deter us. Notice
that this woman doesn't say, okay, I'll never do that again.
No, Mary is a devotee to the Lord Christ, notwithstanding
the severe criticisms of her fellows. She continues, and the
Lord Jesus Christ ultimately shows his approbation for her.
The approbation of the Savior is ultimately the one thing needful,
not what do everybody else think of this particular thing. Spurgeon
said it this way. She did well to take counsel
with her own loving heart, and then to pour the precious nard
upon that deer head, which was so soon to be crowned with thorns.
She thus showed that there was at least one heart in the world
that thought nothing was too good for her Lord, and the best
of the best ought to be given to him. May she have many imitators
in every age until Jesus comes again. So the disciples didn't
quite see it the way that C.H. Spurgeon saw it. And I think
the way that C.H. Spurgeon saw it is the way we
ought to see it. Christ is worthy. The bride says
he is altogether lovely. He is chief among 10,000. He is most high, most glorious,
most wondrous. Certainly he is worthy of 300
denarii of this costly oil broken over his head and dripping down
his body. And as we move on in the text,
we see that Christ affirms this. So we've seen the anointing at
Bethany. Second, the complaint of the disciples. Let's look
thirdly and finally at the response of the Lord Jesus Christ. Verses
10 to 13. Christ was aware of it. And we
might argue he was aware of it according to his divinity, because
he knows the hearts of men. But he was aware of it according
to his humanity, because he heard them complain. He heard them
criticize her. He heard their sort of offers
of resistance in terms of this particular act on their part.
So he is aware of it. And notice how he praises the
woman. Verse 10, he says, why do you
trouble the woman? For she has done a good work
for me. What did they say? Why this waste? Why did you give this last piece
of pie to him? Why did you break this costly
oil on his head? Why this waste? Look at how Jesus
frames it. Why do you trouble the woman?
For she has done a good work for me. What they interpret as
a waste, Christ interprets as a good work. The act they call
a waste is a good work, or in the ESV and NIV, it's a beautiful
thing. And this was, in fact, a beautiful
thing. Consider the particular scene
as well, in a sort of society where men were you know, a bit
above the women. I'm not trying to be mean or
vicious or anti-social justice. I'm just simply suggesting that
for her to do what she did in this context was an expression
of great faith in the Savior and an expression of great devotion
to the Savior in that she does this notwithstanding the criticisms
of these men. The act demonstrates that it
is lawful to show devotion and worship to Christ in a very costly
way. Now, the text does not necessitate
that. The text doesn't say, okay, in
order to truly honor God on the Lord's Day, you should go buy
the most expensive Italian suit that you can find in Vancouver,
because after all, God is great and God is worthy of that. That's
not what the text is expressing. But the text is expressing that
when we do devote time, energy, money, resources, wealth, or
whatever, in the cause of God Most High, as expressions of
devotion to Jesus, that's not a waste. See, the church is often
criticized for doing things that builds up her ability to worship,
to praise, and express devotion. Well, in a world filled with
downtrodden and poor, you can hear sorts of the criticisms
outside. Why would you spend new hymn
books when you've got a whole raft of homeless people living
just down the street? Why would you maintain a sanctuary
that looks decent when you've got all these people in this
community that could use some help? Again, we're not denying
the place of offering help and assistance, but we also ought
not to shrink back from expressing love and affection and adoration
and devotion to the Savior. And now please, hear what I'm
saying. There's no monetary value, there's no sort of qualification.
If you spend this much, then you're really worshipping Jesus.
The point of the passage is, is that Christ is altogether
lovely, Christ is chief among 10,000, and that whatever service
we spend on Him can never be a waste. but he calls it rather
a good work. It's a beautiful thing, according
to other translations. Now, he addresses their concern
for the poor. Notice what he says. For you
have the poor with you always, but me you do not have always. So he says something contrary
to commies and socialists. He says there will always be
poor people on earth. Intriguingly, that communism
and socialism actually creates more poor people. As Churchill
says, it's the equal distribution of misery. And this reality that
the poor will always be on earth is something we need to take
into consideration. That doesn't mean we step over
them and we mock at them and we don't try to help and we don't
try to ameliorate the downtrodden and the poor. But brethren, this
will never be a utopia on earth. There will always be sin, there
will always be curse, there will always be the presence of the
effects of sin in this present world. And so Jesus makes this
statement, for you have the poor with you always, but me you do
not have always. Now, the wording seems to be
that of Deuteronomy 15, 11, which there calls for generosity to
the poor. As Israel is prepared to go into
the land of promise, as Israel is being prepared by Moses on
the plains of Moab to enter into the promised land, we see, you
shall open your hand wide to your brother, to your poor and
needy in your land. So there was that mandate, Deuteronomy,
that they were to tend to the poor. Jesus affirms that. Jesus is not either or-ing here. He's not saying, well, devotion
to me is everything. No, he is simply saying that
you'll always have the poor. You can always give 300 denarii
to them, but me, you will not always have. He's speaking about
and he's confirming what he's already said in verse two, that
he's going to die. Now, we have the promise of 2820
that He is with us even to the end of the age, but that is a
spiritual presence of our Lord with His church. In terms of
His physicality, He would ascend on high, He'd lead captivity
captive, and He'd give gifts to men. He would go back to heaven.
So He says, you're always going to have the poor, you're always
going to have the ability to go out and to give them 300 denarii. You're always able to do that,
but me, you don't always have. In other words, seize on the
opportunities that you have for devotion, for worship, and for
these expressions of affection to your blessed Lord. So he's
not denigrating kindness to the poor. In fact, in the parallel,
in Mark 14, 7, and whenever you wish, you may do them good. In 25, 41, he said that he is
honored when good is done, to the least of these my brethren. So Christ isn't anti-poor, Christ
isn't anti-Deuteronomy, Christ affirms those passages, but he's
simply saying, leave the woman alone. And that's precisely what
he says in the parallel in Mark. She's done or she did what she
could. This is her expression of devotion. This is her expression of faith.
This is her expression of adoration to the Lord. This morning in
our confession study, I referred to that instance in Samuel, when
David in 2 Samuel 6 whirls about in front of the Ark of the Covenant.
Now I made the connection that just because David does that,
it doesn't legitimize or authorize or sanction dancing in the church. My encouragement to all of you,
as I encouraged them this morning, when you're King David of Israel,
and you've secured military victories, and you're with the Ark of the
Covenant of the Lord, go ahead and whirl about it. Go ahead
and dance until your socks fall off, because that's never going
to happen. You cannot take that passage
and argue, therefore, we ought to have dance in the public worship
of God. At any rate, when David does
that, what's the response of his wife? She hated him in her
heart. The only woman that I know of
in the Bible where it says she loved someone and then hated
that same someone. She despised it. She thought
it was a compromise of his royal dignity. She thought that it
somehow jeopardized what everybody else might think of him. What's
David's point? God Almighty is in the midst
of us. God Almighty has vindicated us.
God Almighty is worthy of me whirling about that Ark of the
Covenant. You see, brethren, these men
make the same observation in this context, and Jesus tells
them essentially, back it down. So he praises the women, he highlights
the presence of the poor, then notice he highlights the prophetic
significance of the act. Verse 12, for in pouring this
fragrant oil on my body, she did it for my burial. Again, this confirms verse 2. You know that after two days
is the Passover, and the Son of Man will be delivered to be
crucified. The statement points to the inevitability,
not only of his death, but of his resurrection. It not only
points to the reality that he's going to go in that grave, but
the disciples would have remembered the several instances prior when
he not only pointed out his death, but his inevitable resurrection.
And this anointing is consistent with what's going to happen in
terms of Jesus, the Messiah, doing what he does for the salvation
of sinners. The statement interprets our
actions according to the messianic overtones. specifically the fact
that the Messiah had to die in order to save his people from
their sins. So Christ not only praises her,
Christ not only recognizes the place of the poor, but he also
highlights the prophetic significance of what this woman had done.
Listen to R.T. France. He says, the woman's
extravagant loyalty offsets the shameful horror of crucifixion. Again, you're not supposed to
just jump in and forget everything else around this in a few moments
or in few verses down. Jesus is going to be betrayed
by Judas, or this plan will be concocted. They've already conspired
in the first section, and then there's this devotion, extravagant
devotion by the part of this woman, and then there's this
betrayal concocted by Judas with the religious leaders. Christ
will then institute the supper, Christ will then go to Gethsemane,
and Christ will then stand before the Jewish Sanhedrin. So all
of this stuff is confirmatory of what is going to transpire
relative to his mission. He goes on, France does, that
is why it must always be remembered, not simply as a model of uncalculating
devotion, though it is certainly that, but as an affirmation of
the value of his death from the point of view of faith. Us knowing
Jesus the way we know Jesus, we now know and we are convinced
there is nothing too good for him, right? 300 denarii is chump
change. We should give every bit of denarii
in light of what he's going to do on the cross, in light of
the redemptive work that Christ undertakes on our behalf. Is
there anything that we could ever offer up To even begin to
repay him? Absolutely, positively not. This
is an attempt on the part of the woman to try and repay him.
It's an attempt on the part of the woman to praise him, to adore
him, to express that devotion to him. Worship, brethren, is
our response to what Christ has wrought on behalf of sinners. But then notice, He highlights
a perpetual memorial to her. This is beautiful. Verse 13,
assuredly I say to you, wherever this gospel is preached in the
whole world, what this woman has done will also be told as
a memorial to her. Proverbs 10.7 says, the memory
of the righteous is blessed, but the name of the wicked will
rot. Ecclesiastes 7.1, a good name is better than precious
ointment. You see, Christ is saying that
wherever this gospel is preached, what this woman has done needs
to be told also. So they severely criticize her,
Christ praises her. They severely chide her, Christ
wants to memorialize her. You see, Christ approves of this
kind of worship. Christ approves of the type of
worship that isn't restrained by the thoughts of others. What
will somebody think if they hear me sing just a little bit louder? Remember when one of our sons,
it was Josh, he was a little guy. Boy, he would sing loud.
I mean, just loud. He was like... Just a little
kid sitting back there and just belted out. And I remember his
sisters would kind of, kind of, I'm not picking on his sisters
here, but you know, this kind of, kind of, kind of a little
bit, a little bit too much. It's not too much. Christ is
altogether lovely and chief among 10,000. Christ is worthy. That's
the point of the passage. John Gill says, this woman got
a good name and obtained a good report by her precious ointment.
And if this woman's action was to be told for a memorial of
her, much more what Christ has done and suffered should be told
as a memorial of him. We see this already fulfilled
in the early church. John writes later than Matthew. John 11 too says that this Mary
is the one who took this costly oil and poured it on the head
of Christ, even prior to John 12, where the actual record is
given. So in the early church, it was
already known. Throughout the preaching of the
gospel, the ages of the church, it's known. What Mary does here
was perpetual, it was memorialized. The truth of this statement throughout
the ages. Listen to Ryle. Ryle says the
deeds and titles of many a king and emperor and general are as
completely forgotten as if written in the sand. That's not even
like us, right? Once we go, it's as if our names
were written in the sand. I think our wives and our husbands
will remember, well, not think, they will, right? And our kids
will remember us fondly, I hope. The grandkids will remember us
fondly. But generals, world leaders, emperors, czars, presidents,
prime ministers, those names were, as it were, written in
the sand. He says, but the grateful act of one humble Christian woman
is recorded in 150 different languages and is known all over
the globe. The praise of man is but for
a few days. The praise of Christ endureth
forever. The pathway to lasting honor
is to honor Christ. That's the emphasis of the passage. Devotion, sandwiched in between
conspiracy and betrayal. We, the people of God, ought
to appreciate what this woman does for the Savior as He's about
to embark on the redemptive task of saving us from our sins. Now, in terms of the practical
lessons afforded by the passage, I want to bring out a few. In
the first place, with reference to disciples, with reference
to you and I, there is a tendency to judge and criticize the actions
of others. Now, if you're going, what? Really? You haven't reflected accurately
upon an open Bible in your own heart. The tendency is there
to judge others. In this context, they have the
gall to say, why this waste? It's a terribly belittling thing,
both indirectly to the Savior, the recipient of the thing, but
as well to the woman, the doer of the thing. We need to guard
our hearts. If someone isn't transgressing
God's law, shut your mouth. If somebody isn't lacking conformity
unto God's law, then be quiet. If somebody goes about it in
a manner that's just a little bit different than you, then
keep your mouth closed. As well, there is a tendency
to insult the Savior by this act. Now, I don't think these
men were malicious. I don't think these men were
evil. I don't think these men were pernicious, but they weren't
thinking. When they say, why this waste? Again, if I was Jesus, I'd probably
be thinking, what am I, chopped liver? I mean, come on. He's
the second person of the triune God, come down for us men and
for our salvation, took on our humanity, submitted himself to
the law, always did what was pleasing to the Father, is about
to embark on crucifixion for the sins of his people. He is
going to suffer in a way that you and I never will have to
because of what he's done. And they say, why this waste? And then the tendency, as I've
already said, to practice an either-or Christianity rather
than a both-and. Brethren, we have two great commandments. Love the Lord your God with all
your heart, soul, mind, and strength. That's our worship. That's our
devotion. That's our expression of faith
and praise and adoration to the true and living God. but we're
also governed by the second, which is like unto it, love your
neighbor as yourself. Those are our acts of kindness,
our acts of benevolence, our acts of goodness. See, there
are two that regulate the conduct of God's people. When we do an
either-or, we're not being responsible. We need to be about both and,
the worship of God and a reasonable attempt to help those around
us who are in need. Secondly, in terms of a practical
lesson, the woman. The woman spared no expense in
her devotion to the Lord. The question has been asked,
and I don't think it's wrong, where'd she get this oil? I mean,
300 denarii, an entire salary for a working man? Where did
she get it? you know, ideas or options or
possibilities. It could have been a family sort
of a thing, could have been an heirloom that you pass down from generation
to generation. Whatever the situation is, she
takes this very costly oil and pours it on the head of the Savior.
According to Mark's gospel, secondly, she did what she could. Don't
you love that? We're not going to be judged
on what we couldn't do. We will be judged on what we
could do. Some of us can't afford to build a temple. That's just
not gonna happen. But most of us can afford to
show up. We do what we can, and that's
what's underscored. In fact, look at the parallel
for a moment, just so you can see it. Mark 14. Mark 14, there's
a couple of dynamics that come out that are absent in Matthew. Mark 14.3, and being in Bethany
at the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at the table, a woman
came having an alabaster flask of very costly oil of spikenard.
Then she broke the flask and poured it on his head. But there
were some who were indignant among themselves and said, why
was this fragrant oil wasted? For it might have been sold for
more than 300 denarii and given to the poor. And they criticized
her sharply. But Jesus said, let her alone.
That was my previous application. Leave him alone. Unless somebody's
breaking God's law, leave them alone. Don't mess with them. Don't... you know, intrude upon. Don't be the worship police.
Don't be the devotion police. Don't be the Pharisees that regulate
the conduct of your fellows based on your personal preferences
or whims. He says, leave her alone. Why do you trouble her?
She has done a good work for me. For you have the poor with
you always, and whenever you wish, you may do them good. But
me you do not have always. She has done what She could she
has come beforehand to anoint my body for burial Assuredly
I say to you wherever this gospel is preached in the whole world
What this woman has done will also be told as a memorial to
her turn to 1st Corinthians chapter 15 1 Corinthians chapter 15,
where you see a general principle set forth by the apostle in terms
of our service unto the Lord. 1 Corinthians 15.58, therefore,
my beloved brethren, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in
the work of the Lord. Notice, knowing that your labor
is not in vain in the Lord. Christ doesn't say, what, 300
denarii? You couldn't have bought that?
You couldn't have done better? She did what she could. She didn't
have any more wealth. She didn't have any more resources.
The very best that she has, she pours it out on his head. And
then as well, she did not seek man's approval, but rather Christ's
approval, and she received it. He commends her. He memorializes
her. It's in the gospel. We're talking
about her right now. She was memorialized in Scripture
for her actions. And I want to underscore this
by saying, it's not necessarily great accomplishments. but rather
great devotion to Jesus. You know, some people are useful
in the kingdom in ways that others aren't, but the ways that others
aren't are still ways. You do what you can. You seek
to honor the Lord, consistent with what you have and what you
are under God. This woman sets forth that glorious
example. And then finally, relative to
the Savior. lessons with reference to the
Savior. In the first place, he receives her devotion and worship. We're in Acts 14. At Lystra,
the folk are going to try to worship Paul and Barnabas. They're
going to think that the gods have come down. You've got Paul
as Hermes because he's the speaker, and you've got Barnabas who's
Zeus, and as a result, these pagans want to bow and want to
worship in their presence. What do they do? They say, don't
do that. Remember when Simon Peter shows
up at Cornelius's house. Cornelius wants to worship Simon
Peter. Peter says, no, I'm a man just like you are. When you get
to the book of Revelation, John wants to bow down to an angel
and the angel says, don't do that. What does Jesus do? Does
he say, don't do that? I'm not a glorious being. I'm
not altogether lovely. No, he receives this act of worship
and devotion, underscoring. his dignity as the God-man. Secondly, he defends her from
the criticism of the disciples. Isn't that beautiful? Don't let
anybody ever tell you, oh, Christianity is a bunch of chauvinistic pigs.
Christ is a defender of this woman. Christ says to them, leave
her alone. She did what she could. He gave
voice to her actions and he calls off the dogs and tells them to
quit barking up her tree. And then thirdly, he acknowledges
her contribution based on her ability. That's good news. You know, people say, well, I
don't have that. Well, what you do have, you should
be willing to part with for the cause of God and truth. Remember
that widow's mites. She gave from everything she
had. Certainly there's others giving
more money, but she felt that pinch when she gave it. I think
I've said before that sacrifice really is sacrifice. If sacrifice
doesn't cost you anything, it's not a sacrifice. You see sacrifice
costing Jesus everything, and yet when it comes to believers
giving, we oftentimes try to cheap out. We try to be misers. We try to say, well, that woman
only gave two mites. Yeah, because that's all she
had. When you only have two mites and you give them, praise God,
from whom all blessings flow. But if we're sitting on a pile
of mites, hiding behind her two mites, then we've misinterpreted
the thrust of the passage. Sacrifice should pinch. Sacrifice
should hurt. Fourthly, he confirms ongoing
generosity to the poor. He doesn't say, look, it's all
about me. It is all about him. And part of what he says is to
go out and look after the poor. He confirms his crucifixion and
his resurrection from the dead. He confirms a worldwide missionary
outreach. to proclaim the gospel. Assuredly,
I say to you, wherever this gospel is preached in the whole world,
what this woman has done will also be told as a memorial to
her." He confirms, in Psalm, why he is worthy of such devotion
and extravagance. He is chief among 10,000. I mentioned
that earlier, Song of Solomon 510. Over the last few years,
it's become sort of Christian, in the popular Christian realm,
to interpret the Song of Solomon as a marriage manual between
a husband and a wife. It's between Yahweh and Israel. It's between Christ and the Church.
That's who the Song of Solomon is about. So we have this statement
concerning Christ. He is chief among 10,000. He
is altogether lovely. I'm reminded of a particular
passage or comment on 1 Kings chapter 8. Earlier I said, what
would they have said about the extravagance in the temple? What
would they have said about those gold hinges? If this was their
response, would they have been down with the temple? And I think
they would have been, they're just not thinking consistently
here. But Ralph Davis comments on the extravagance of the temple
in the Old Testament. And if you haven't read 1 Kings
6-8, you should read it sometime. You should get it in your head
to see how Israel approached her God under the Old Covenant. But Davis says, I suggest that
the splendor of the temple is meant to reflect the splendor
of Israel's God. That the temple's gold points
to Yahweh's glory. It was a world in which kings
built or refurbished lavish temples as appropriate tributes to their
gods and goddesses. In such a world, why should Yahweh
look like a discount store deity with a government loan house?
If there is an indulgence that is sinful, Luke 12, there is
an extravagance that is godly, Mark 14, our woman who poured
out this oil. He says, and perhaps the message
of the temple gold is that nothing cheap should be offered to Yahweh,
but only what is a tribute commensurate with His splendor. I think that's
consistent with what we find here in Matthew chapter 26. This
oil reflects the splendor of this Messiah. Well, praise God
Almighty that we have one who is altogether lovely and is chief
among 10,000. If you don't have this one, you
need to. You need to look to Him in faith.
You need to believe the gospel. You need to quit looking to your
own works or your own accomplishments, or somehow arguing yourself out
of the kingdom because of some perceived ideas that are imbalanced
with reference to God's sovereignty. The gospel is preached, and the
gospel is simply this. Christ Jesus came into the world
to save sinners. We might suggest it this way,
in Romans 5a, God commends His own love toward us in that while
we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. The reality is that He
lived and died and rose again, and all those who look to Him
in faith will have everlasting life. And then it's the hope
and prayer of all of us, or it should be, that we express this
kind of devotion and affection and adoration to this kind of
Savior, because He's worthy. Well, let us pray. Our Father,
we thank you so much for this blessed Christ. We thank you
for the wonder of the incarnation. We thank you for the wonder of
His mission on earth. We thank you especially for that
life, that death, that resurrection on the third day. And God, we
know that He came to save His people from their sins. That's
in Matthew 1. Matthew 26 to 28 demonstrates
how that is the case. And I pray that everyone here
would be looking unto Him in faith, For those of us who by
grace are believers, may we express that devotion, that worship,
and that adoration in ways that are consistent with his dignity
and with his glory and with his majesty. And for those who aren't
believers, we pray that you would grant them grace to see that
he is chief among 10,000, to see that he is altogether lovely,
to see that he is alone the one who is able to save sinners.
And we ask this in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, amen.