The Olivet Discourse, Part 11
Sermons on Matthew
Please turn with me in your Bibles to Matthew chapter 24. Matthew chapter 24, returning to our exposition of Matthew's gospel, we find ourselves in the Olivet Discourse beginning in chapter 24 at verse 1 and ending at the end of chapter 25. Our section this morning will be verses 36 to 44, so I'll read there in Matthew 24 beginning in verse 36. But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark. and did not know until the flood came and took them all away. So also will the coming of the Son of Man be. Then two men will be in the field, one will be taken in the other left. Two women will be grinding at the mill, one will be taken in the other left. Watch, therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming. But know this, that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into. Therefore, you also be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. Amen. Well, let us pray. Father in heaven, we thank you for the written word of God and we pray now for the ministry of the Holy Spirit. At the outset, we confess our ignorance, we confess our lack of diligence with reference to studying scripture. We pray that you would forgive us for all of our sins and all unrighteousness and cast away anything that would darken our understanding and our minds. We pray for the illumination of the Holy Spirit. We pray that He would guide us and lead us into all truth. We pray that we would see the emphasis in this passage upon watchfulness, to realize that Jesus Christ is coming again in glory to judge the living and the dead. May we all take these things to heart. May we all consider our place before a holy God. May we see our sins rightly, and may there be conviction for that sin. And may the Holy Spirit indeed cause us to be alive together with Christ, cause us all to be looking to Christ in faith and with repentance. May you be glorified in the salvation of sinners. May you be glorified in the sanctification of your people. And may you produce and promote in all of our hearts a watchfulness. And we pray through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. Well, thus far in our studies in the Olivet Discourse, we have covered a lot of ground. I just want to quickly review up to this particular point. The larger context of the Olivet Discourse is in chapters 21 to 23. Our Lord there goes toe-to-toe with the religious leaders of His generation. He tells a series of parables, and the emphasis is upon judgment coming upon Jerusalem. At the end of chapter 23, he announces that their house, specifically their temple, would indeed be left to them desolate. And it's on the heels of that that the disciples then come to him and say, look at the beauty of the temple. And Jesus says, all of these stones will be cast down. And that causes the disciples to ask two questions. They ask, what will be the sign of your coming and the end of the age? And I take those two things to be the same, the sign of Christ's coming in judgment and the end of the Jewish age. And then when will these things be? So I submit that Christ answers their what question in verses 1 to 35. And essentially, he highlights that there would be a period, a beginning of birth pains, The preaching of the gospel would go forth as a witness to the nations. There would be a command to flee Jerusalem when the siege begins. The reason for their flight was given in verses 21 to 22. The warning that there would be false Christs during that time trying to help the people to avoid this particular judgment. As well, he highlights the coming of the Son of Man in judgment upon the land of Israel in verses 29 to 31. He gives the parable of the fig tree, which indicates that these things were indeed coming on the horizon. And then he underscores his prophetic certainty by saying in verse 35, heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will by no means pass away. And that after having stipulated the generation that would see the great judgment that he had spoken of. Notice in verse 34, Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place. And I suggest that a good understanding of all these things are all these things that he has spoken up to this particular point. It was specifically the judgment upon Jerusalem in A.D. 70 for God bringing to bear upon the nation the curses of the covenant written in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 for their persistent rebellion, for their covenantal unfaithfulness, for their rejection of God's Messiah himself, they brought down upon themselves the wrath and the fury of Almighty God. So in verses 36 and following to the end of chapter 25, Jesus gives a lot of practical application. In light of this reality, how then shall we live? So I want to do three things this morning as we consider verses 36 to 44. First of all, the identification of the day. in verse 36. He says, but of that day and hour, no one knows. So we need to understand what day he's speaking about. Secondly, the analogy with the days of Noah in verses 37 to 42. And then finally, the illustration of the thief and the knight in verses 43 to 44. But in the first place, the identification of the day in verse 36. Notice, but of that day and hour, no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but my Father only. Now the typical interpretation is that that day here refers to the second coming of our Lord Jesus. This is generally agreed upon by most interpreters with reference to Matthew's gospel, the Olivet Discourse specifically, Matthew chapters 24 and 25. The idea being that perhaps most or some of what has preceded does apply to AD 70, but then Jesus shifts gear and speaks concerning His second coming, His physical coming, when He comes again, whenever I will see Him, and He will usher in the eternal state after a big judgment, that day is spoken of in verse 36 as in the future. And there are some compelling reasons for this. In the first place, the obviousness of it. I mean, if we do agree that at least up to this point, much of what Christ has spoken of does deal with the destruction of Jerusalem, after this seems to fit better a context where Christ comes out of heaven to judge the world comprehensively. So there is that obviousness of the interpretation. As well, some point to what's called the demonstrative pronouns. Now, kids, you probably know what demonstrative pronouns are better than your parents. So I'm not speaking to you, I'm speaking to your parents. But note the use of the demonstrative, this generation, in verse 34. That's a near, that's a near demonstrative. This generation speaks to something close by. That is a remote or a far demonstrative. That day seems to bespeak a very future era, a very future time. So much is made concerning this idea of the demonstrative pronouns, this generation versus that day and hour. As well, the word parousia, perhaps you have seen that before in written literature and you've read it as parousia, but the Greek pronunciation is parousia. And it literally means presence. It literally means appearance or visitation. In fact, one very popular dictionary says that it means presence, coming, or advent. gradually became a technical term used among Christians to refer to the second coming of our Lord Jesus. Well, the argument here is that the word parousia appears in verse 27, and then it appears here again in this small section in verses 36 to 44. The idea being is that verses 27 and 28 deal with that second physical coming, and so what Jesus is now speaking to refers to that second physical coming as well. Now, I'm suspecting that I'm losing most everybody, so please bear with me for just a moment because this is important. It does make sense of the passage to know what's happening in the context. There is a second position that Jesus continues to speak concerning A.D. 70. Now, as I said, this is a minority position even among preterist interpreters. It does not mean one is a hyper-preterist. If I haven't lost you yet, I'm going to in the next two minutes. Hyper-preterism teaches there is no second physical coming of our Lord Jesus. Hyper-preterism teaches that we're in the eternal state. We are in that consummate glory already. Just because we continue with an AD 70 interpretation from verse 36 and following does not mean we're hyper-preterists. I have used and I have trotted out several times John Gill. John Gill was a premillennialist. but he was a preterist with reference to Matthew 24 and 25, even continuing through verses 36 to the end of chapter 25. And I think that this position does have some compelling reasons as to why we ought to understand it this way. The disciples asked two questions, a what question and a when question. I think Jesus answered their questions. I think he answered their questions in a way that would make sense to them. I think that he answered their questions very clearly. He began with the what. Well, they asked first when and then the what. Why would he ask the what? Because he wanted to end on the when in order to press upon their consciences the necessity to be watchful, to be ready, to be prepared, to be diligent, and to realize their accountability before a holy God. But he answers the what in verses 4 to 35. And now in verse 36, he addresses the when. When will these things be? Secondly, there are no textual identifiers that a new subject is in view. Again, the demonstrative pronouns do not make the case one way or the other. If we just read the passage and we didn't bring to the passage a lot of baggage, we might assume Jesus is still discoursing on the same subject. As well, what I will call the ignorant son. Now if you look at your New King James, supposing you have a New King James, the marginal reading adds, or says, NU adds nor the son. If you have the NASV, the ESV, or the NIV, that's in the text. Have you ever considered that? This is something Jesus doesn't know! Either way, it's in Mark 13, 32. So Jesus did say this. Jesus did make this utterance in verse 36. But of that day and hour, no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but my Father only. Through the history of interpretation, this has been called the passage concerning the ignorant son. Now, when we say the ignorant son, we don't mean he's simpleton or he drools or something like that. Ignorance means there is something that Jesus does not know. And I think that Christians stumble at verse 36, if they're reading one of those other translations, or they stumble when they get to Mark 13, 32. They scratch their melons and they say, wait a minute, Jesus doesn't know something? And yet we'll continue to read on in Matthew's Gospel, and Jesus will suffer! Jesus will bleed! There's other portions in Matthew's Gospel where Jesus eats! Have you ever considered that deity doesn't eat? Deity doesn't bleed. Deity doesn't suffer. Deity certainly doesn't die. So deity is not being spoken of in verse 36 when Jesus says, nor the son. He's speaking according to his humanity. He is speaking according to his manhood. In Philippians chapter two, Paul tells us that he is the form or in the form of God, but he takes on the form of a bondservant. It ought not to surprise us as we read through the gospel narratives that Jesus, the man, does man things. Jesus is not simply God in a flesh suit. Jesus is God of God, light from light, true God from true God. But he is begotten in all eternity. He's not made, but for us men and for our salvation. He came down from heaven. He took on our humanity. He identifies with us. He takes on our flesh, all of the common, or all the essential properties and common infirmities that make up a man. So when Jesus says, nor the Son, don't freak out and say, well, he's God, and how could he be ignorant of something? He's God, man, that suffers, that dies, that bleeds. You ever read Luke's gospel? Luke chapter 2, Luke chapter 1 tells us that Jesus increased in stature and wisdom. Well, He didn't do that according to His divinity. He didn't do that according to His godhood. He didn't do that according to the form of God. He did that according to His humanity. And brethren, this is something the church needs to grasp and understand so they can think properly concerning who Jesus Christ is. I was sharing with the brothers yesterday that modern commentators don't always get passages like these right. I mean, they don't deny or they don't have heresy or they don't say stuff that is just blatantly wrong, but they really struggle with explaining the son's ignorance in this particular passage. So you go back to the early church, specifically Gregory of Nazianzus, and he says, thus everyone must see that he knows as God. Right? Christ knows all things as God. Everyone must see that he knows as God and knows not as man. We are to understand the ignorance in the most reverent sense by attributing it to the manhood and not to the Godhead. Just like when you see him suffering on the cross, brethren, God can't die. Deity doesn't die. This is Christ in his humanity. This is Christ according to his manhood. This is Christ in the form of a bondservant, this one blessed person in two natures, the hypostatic union. If I've lost you at this point, you need to come back. Because if you don't get all of the particulars concerning what day is in view, you can't get Christ wrong. You can't mess up. You can't divinize His humanity or humanize His divinity. You've got to see the one Christ in two natures. Our confession renders it this way. Christ in the work of mediation acts according to both natures, by each nature doing that which is proper to itself. Of course in his humanity there are things he doesn't know. Of course in his humanity he eats bread. Of course in his humanity he bleeds. Of course in his humanity he sorrows. Of course in his humanity he suffers. Of course in his humanity he dies. Brethren, this is consistent with what the gospel writers tell us everywhere concerning Jesus. This is consistent with the theological interpretation of who Jesus is in the rest of the New Testament. And this is what the early church fought for and contended for through the councils of Nicaea and Constantinople. They wanted to get the doctrine of Christ right. You may leave here this morning disagreeing with my presentation on which day is in view of verse 36, but you cannot leave today disagreeing with who Jesus is and get things right with God. There is an instance in John's Gospel when the Lord Christ says, if you do not believe that I am, and I think he's invoking that majestic name Yahweh from Exodus 3.14, if you do not believe that I am, you will die in your sins. You see, this morning, we're gonna differ on eschatology. That's the study of last things. It's the end times view. I really believe that what the day is following still applies to AD 70. If you disagree with me, fine. But if you disagree on who Jesus is, things are not fine. If you deny his divinity, you deny his humanity, therein denying his person, you are going to go to hell. All religions do not lead to heaven. All religions will not get you there. Try your best, live in light of the information that you have and just give it your best and you'll make it to heaven. That's the world's gospel. The Christian message is, I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. And we must define the me. You see, sometimes people say, well, why do you spend all that time going over that old confession of faith? Because it's right. It accurately describes what the Bible teaches concerning Jesus. And if we don't understand those things, if we have not appropriated those things by faith, we will die in our sins. You see, it is absolutely crucial that we understand what the Bible means or who the Bible means when it says Jesus Christ. See, the world's religions say, well, what does it mean for you? It doesn't matter what it means for you. That doesn't make it true. Right? There is that idea, well, you know, Jesus was just this hippie-like figure that danced around in Palestine and we all just got to be more like him. Somebody buy robes and, you know, get a tambourine and go bang it at the airport and, you know, ask for change because Jesus would be happy with that. That's not who Jesus is. The Mormons have their conception of Jesus, don't they? Brother Lucifer. Jehovah's Witnesses have their conception of Jesus, don't they? Are they right? In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a God? A little g-God? Is that accurate to what the Scriptures present? No. If you don't understand who Christ is, you will perish in your sins. If you understand who Christ is and you continue to resist Him and reject Him and stiff-arm the overtures of Gospel preaching, you will perish in your sins. The idea is that you understand who this Jesus is, and that by grace alone, through faith alone, and Him alone, you will have everlasting life. But how is this important with reference to this interpretation that it does refer to 80-70? Because I think that if we don't see verses 17 and 18 in this light, Jesus would be disingenuous. Notice in verse 17 in the discourse, let him who is on the housetop not go down to take anything out of his house, and let him who is in the field not go back to get his clothes. But woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days. Verse 20, here's what I want you to focus on. and pray that your flight may not be in winter or on the Sabbath." It'd be a disingenuous statement if he knew that it would be on the Sabbath or it would be in winter, wouldn't it? It'd be kind of unfair pool. If Jesus knew the particular day that he was coming in judgment via the Roman armies upon the city of Jerusalem in AD 70, he knew the specific day, why would he tell them, pray that it may not be on the Sabbath? Pray that it may, well, if he already knew that, it just feels disingenuous and it doesn't feel worthy of our Christ. As well, the parallel in Luke 17, 20 to 37. Luke 17, 20 to 37, we looked at that passage when we went through the exposition, and we saw that same concept, same thing, same principles are used there in that short account of the destruction of AD 70. Verse 25 tells us it's this generation. And with reference to the surrounding context, he uses the same analogy with Noah. He adds Lot, but Noah and the days of Noah are there predicated on what happens in AD 70. and then the gravity of the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple. You say, well, you know, he had the general time reference, but he didn't know the particular day or hour, but why is it important? Remember what's happening. He's actually warning real-life people to flee a city that's going to come under siege. He doesn't know that specific time according to His humanity, according to the form of a bondservant. He has given them the general warning, He has given them the general principles, but of that day and hour, no one knows, not even the psalm. So you need to be watchful. You need to be prepared. You need to be diligent. You need to realize you have an accountability before God. Now, brethren, I think the scales tip in favor of the same theme as continued from verse 36 to the end of chapter 25. But I'm not going to press that any longer. We're going to treat the subsequent sections by way of exhortation. Because if they were applicable to the A.D. 70 event, they're certainly applicable to the second coming. Right? We're not going to jump back and forth subsequent to this long introduction. Actually, this is an introduction. This is a somewhat explanation. We're not going to jump back and forth. This is what's called a hortatory section. Again, if I'm going to lose you, I'm going to lose you. But hortatory means exhortation. Exhortation means to encourage people with teeth. I don't mean bite them, but I mean give them exhortation to move the will to appropriate response. This is why I think he addresses the when question second, because he wants to leave in their heads this ringing, banging gong that they need to be watchful people. They need to be faithful people. They need to be prepared people. They need to be diligent people, and they need to be an accountable people. That applies to us with reference to the second coming, doesn't it? You see, the principle, the exhortation, the main encouragement comes here in verses 36 to 44. He is telling them, and we'll see this in just a moment, to watch. Be watchful. You don't know when those Roman armies are coming, AD 70, but you don't know when Jesus is coming, our future. You need to watch. The rest of the parables, the rest of the teaching, till the end of chapter 25, explains that watchfulness. You see, we might be told to watch, and our custom might be to sell everything, to take what few possessions we have, and to sit on the roof and wait until Jesus comes. There's been people that have done that, haven't there? I think that was what was going on in Thessalonica. I think that's why Paul says, if a man doesn't work, neither let him eat. There was a last days madness among the Thessalonians, and they thought, well, Jesus is coming any moment, so I'm not going to go to work. Why waste my time at work when Jesus comes? What a terrible view of work. Work is not a waste of time. God gave us work to bring glory to Him. If the fourth word teaches rest, it teaches work. There is dignity, integrity, blessing, and joy in work. So for anybody to say, I'm going to quit my job, sit on the roof, and wait for Jesus to return, that's not watchfulness. Watchfulness is how Jesus describes it in the remainder of the discourse. It is faithfulness, verses 45 to 51. It is preparedness, chapter 25, verses 1 to 13. It is diligence in 25, 14 to 30. You see, you cannot say, well, Jesus is going to come. I don't really need to deal with these talents. Jesus is going to come. I can just sort of bury them and sit on them and wait for his arrival. You lazy servant, get out there and traffic with my goods and prosper them. You see, this fills out what watchfulness looks like. Christian watchfulness, in light of the coming of our Lord Jesus, isn't selling everything you have and sitting on the roof. This would be a tough roof to sit on. But brethren, Christian watchfulness is faithfulness. It is preparedness, it is diligence, and it's living in light of the reality of an accountability before God. You will be judged by the Son of Man for things done in the body, whether good or evil. That's how the discourse ends. You see, whatever our focus is or whatever the specific that day points to, the situation following doesn't change. We need to be watchful. We need to be faithful. We need to be prepared. We need to be diligent in light of the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. So let's look, secondly, at the analogy with the days of Noah. Verses 37 to 42, he makes a comparison, gives a reason, and then applies it to their specific situation. Note the comparison in verse 37, but as the days of Noah were, so also will be the coming of the Son of Man be. Now, the days of Noah should alert everybody, right? What happened in the days of Noah? Judgment, calamity, turmoil saved those eight souls that were in the ark. that Christ uses the language of Noah highlights the seriousness of his doctrine. I mean, when you look at the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, if Noah and his situation does not jump out at you as one of the significant judgments of God, you are not reading the Bible properly. It always bugs me to go into a Sunday school room or to see a children's storybook and, you know, Noah's ark looks like this boat and all these little animals are happy and, you know, they're beaming as animals do when they're on an ark together and they're not devouring one another. Talk about supernatural grace that predators and prey animals could be on the same ark and not kill each other is indicative of the reality that God is indeed sovereign. that he brings all these animals to Noah. But this idea that it was just this happy, joyous event. Yeah, it was great for the eight people on the ark. Fantastic for Noah and his family. Just great to be in the haven that was the ark of God. But what of those on the outside? What of those pounding on the bottom of the ark when the rains have started to rise up? What about those who had rejected Noah, who, according to Peter, was a preacher of righteousness? You see the comparison holds, doesn't it? Noah used his ark as the pulpit in order to preach righteousness, and they disregarded him. They didn't listen to him. Jesus announces a destruction coming upon AD 70. No, not everybody listened to him. Not everybody took him seriously. They brushed him off as, you know, a false prophet or as a revolutionary. He said that this temple would be destroyed, and in so doing, he's attacked the very superstructure of Judaism as a whole, as well in the second coming. Preachers preach righteousness every Sunday and people don't listen. Just look around you. You may not even need to look around you. It may be you, you may be hearing this right now saying, oh, this is just all so boring, just can't wait till it's done. I think mom or dad or husband or wife made a pot roast for lunch and that's just gonna be great. You're thinking about everything other than the reality that God is and that he is a consuming fire. You see, that Jesus would invoke the days of Noah ought to show us the solemnity of the occasion, and it ought to underscore for us the great lesson of this passage, to watch. How dare us not watch when the word of God most high calls us to. So that's the comparison. The days preceding the flood were similar to the days preceding God's judgment here. The people in the days of Noah had most likely been warned. You think when Noah's up there pounding nails on the ark, people are saying, what are you doing? Well, I'm doing this because God's going to bring judgment upon this earth and this is the way he's going to preserve me. I don't think Noah wouldn't answer them. Not going to tell you. Why wouldn't he tell them? Why wouldn't he? Peter tells us he was a preacher of righteousness. Perhaps as he's banging nails up there, his sons are banging nails. They're telling people, you need to repent. God is not pleased with an earth that is exceedingly corrupt and filled with violence. God is not pleased when men kill men. in an unlawful and unholy way. God is not pleased when persons lie sexually with someone who's not their wife or their husband. God is not pleased with the lies and the deceit and the covetousness and the idolatry and the Sabbath-breaking and the insubordination that's going on on the earth. Perhaps Noah and his sons, every nail they pounded, they were preaching righteousness to these people. And what happened? I never saw rain, didn't care about rain. What do you need that boat for? It's a big fool's errand. The people rejected the warning and they perished. Notice, it goes on, verses 38 and 39. For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage until the day that Noah entered the ark and did not know until the flood came and took them all away. So also will the coming of the son of man be. Now this is a terrifying passage. And I think primarily the target audience is disciples, because that's who ask the questions about the collapse of the temple, isn't it? That's Jesus' audience in this section of his ministry. Look at what he says. Notice that he does not say they were murdering. They were raping. They were embezzling funds. They were cheating on their taxes. They were a profligate generation. They were vile and wretched and wicked and horrible. No, they were eating and drinking. Now the Greek word for eating here is a bit of a different one than what Matthew typically uses, and it may carry the connotation of they were feeding, or we might put it in the vernacular, they were pigging out. It might show something of the baseness of that particular culture at the time of the days of Noah, but in terms of eating and drinking, those are normal experiences, aren't they? Marrying and giving in marriage are normal experiences, aren't they? Is God against us eating and drinking? Is God against us marrying and giving in marriage? No! Not at all! Jesus' point is very simple. They were eating and drinking to the neglect of a sovereign God. They were marrying and giving in marriage to the neglect of a sovereign God. They didn't consider His righteousness. They didn't consider His holiness. They didn't consider the fact that He was nigh and that He was a consuming fire. And you see, if that was indeed the case in 87, it's certainly the case today. It is certainly the case today that we pursue the ordinary without any thought for the eternal. We glut ourselves on the routine without giving conscious thought to the reality that God is nigh and He is a consuming fire. There's nothing wrong with the particular activities mentioned. Do not take from this sermon today that I need to go home and stop eating and stop drinking and not get married and not be given in marriage. That's not the point. The point is, is that when there are preachers of righteousness warning you of a holy God, when there are preachers of righteousness telling you of a glorious Christ, when there are preachers of righteousness opening up God's truth to you, don't be more consumed with the mundane than you are with the eternal. They weren't watchful. We're not watchful. In fact, we live in such a way as it seems that we don't even care that Christ will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead. And if someone says, well, if that was 80, 70, then you take it away from all of us to be watchful. No, I don't know when Christ is coming again in glory. I don't know when the second coming is gonna be. But I know based on this passage, we better be watchful You young people plan your lives to be sure under the auspices of your parents' guidance, but don't plan in such a way that you've excluded God. How many people do this when they get married or they go on to higher education? They give no thought to God. What job will best promote a life of devotion to God? I'm not suggesting no job, go live out in the desert and shave your head and chant. I'm not saying that. There are jobs that are conducive to the service of God. There are jobs wherein you may be home on the Sabbath day. What about a spouse? What is Paul's stipulation for Christian marriage? It must be Christian marriage. Right? Don't marry a man or a woman that doesn't confess saving faith. Don't live your life to the exclusion of God Most High. Don't pursue those things which are lawful and ordinary and normal without thinking of God. That's the problem, just like in the days of Noah, probably just like in the days preceding the siege in Jerusalem, and just like our own day. We pursue everything and anything, and yet we don't consciously entertain the reality that God is nigh, and He is a consuming fire. Spurgeon made this comment. That which is lawful and right under other circumstances becomes a positive evil when it takes the place of preparation for the coming of the Son of Man. That makes sense, doesn't it? Again, this doesn't mean you need to quit your job and prepare for the coming of the Son of Man. You know the best way to be prepared for the coming of the Son of Man is be at your job. If you're a carpenter, be banging nails when Jesus returns. Have you ever thought of that? What do I want to be doing when Jesus returns? Well, I want to be reading my Bible. Somehow that's more holy than me banging nails into a wall. Why? God created you to be a carpenter. What better thing for Jesus to find when he returns again in glory? If you're a mother or your wife, I don't want to be changing a diaper when Jesus returns. Why? Jesus is glorified when you change those diapers. See, we're so messed up in our thinking. There's the sacred and there's the secular. One of the good things about the Reformation, everything became sacred. Your job is sacred. Your family is sacred. Things done for the glory of God are sacred. Whether you're banging nails, you're playing pianos, you're changing diapers, you're out foiling crime, or whatever it is God has called you to, why would it be wrong to be found engaged in that when Jesus comes again? Praise God, wouldn't that be awesome? I mean, I personally have the desire that we'd be singing 599 together as a church, and he'd come at that particular time. I just think that'd be great. The Lamb is all the glory of Emmanuel's land, and then he comes in glory. Wouldn't that be great? Just collectively, together, be ushered up into the presence. That would be my preference. I'm sitting in there staring at my books, thinking about a passage of Scripture. That's fine, too. If I'm in the backyard shoveling snow so that my dog can wander out there and do her business, that's fine too. Brethren, why is it that we have adopted this mindset that there is a life lived apart from God? The point of the passage is eat, drink, marry, be married, pound nails, plumb toilets, change diapers under the conscious reality that God is nigh and He is a consuming fire. There is a judgment to come. There is accountability to be rendered. There is a heaven to be gained by the grace of God or a hell to be suffered. Just as it was in the days of Noah, men glut themselves, men engage in all these sorts of things." And then notice what he goes on to say, "...did not know until the flood came and took them all away. So also will the coming of the Son of Man be." Now this next two verses are tough. They're tough on whatever reading you take of the particular sermon or of the particular discourse. I do not believe it's a secret rapture passage. I think we have to bring eschatology to the text to get a secret rapture out of the text. Notice verse 40, then two men will be in the field, one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding at the mill, one will be taken and the other left. We assume the taken there means taken in a secret rapture. You've seen the bumper stickers. In case of rapture, this car will be unmanned. Perhaps you've seen left behind, and they're in the airplane, and the passengers on the airplane look over, and there's just a pile of clothes, because I guess when you get raptured, your clothes don't make the cut. This passage has been utilized for that purpose, and I'm not trying to mock the position. Probably it sounds like that. I'm sorry. I'm a man, and I do have my issues. It doesn't tell us they'll be taken up It doesn't tell us they'll be taken for blessing. In fact, if we look at the particular context, when Jesus says that those who are in the field, don't go grab your cloak and then run. If you're on the roof, don't go downstairs and then run. It would indicate that in those mundane tasks, such as eating and drinking and marrying and given in marriage, to be taken then would probably be by the Roman armies and that can't be good. What's it mean to be left? Does it mean eternal blessing and bliss and heaven and joy? It may mean that, but we just don't know. In fact, the very near and immediate context, if you look at verse 39, did not know until the flood came and took them all away. Intriguing. They were taken away, and it certainly wasn't for bliss. It certainly wasn't for will. It certainly wasn't for joy. They were taken away into judgment. So why, with reference to these two men laboring and these two women grinding, the one taken has been secretly raptured? It is to bring a foreign concept to the text. It is to try and read out of the text something that has been imposed upon the text. What does it mean an 80-70 position? It's still tough. Two men are working. One gets taken away for prison, for death, for whatever. The other is left. He manages to escape. It doesn't even say the one that's left lives. They could be left dead. I don't know. But the point is, is that the days preceding both Jerusalem and the coming of the Son of Man is such that there will be a distinction made. There will be discrimination rendered. There will be some taken, there will be some left. Watch, that's the point. And that brings us to his point here in verse 42 in this analogy with the days of Noah. Watch therefore for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming. You see the point? No matter what interpretation we take, here's his point, watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming. Intriguing, he calls himself your Lord. He had a high Christology too, didn't he? He had a proper understanding of his place and his role. He speaks according to his humanity in the form of a bondservant, but he speaks according to Godhead. He speaks according to deity. He says, watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming. The point of the section. Whatever judgment is in view, and we're going to treat it as the second coming, the people of God must be watchful, they must be on guard. The parables that follow illustrate and flesh out what that watchfulness looks like. I've already rehearsed it, I don't need to again. But then let's end quickly with this illustration of the thief in the night. Songs have been written and movies have been made with this in the title. We see this illustration used in Luke 12, 1 Thessalonians 5, 2 and 4, 2 Peter 3, Revelation 3, Revelation 16. But look at his illustration and see how it serves the context. He says, but know this. that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into." Now, for this to make sense, Jesus assumes the propriety of self and home defense. I don't want to get into a big pro-gun rant here, but the idea that we can't protect ourselves or our families or our property is foreign to Scripture. Where am I called as a householder to let a big strong man come to my door, punch me in the nose, walk into my house, take my wife, take my daughters, take my stuff, walk back through, and step on me on the way out? I just don't see it in the Bible. I realize there are people that would call themselves pacifists. Don't call Jesus a pacifist. Again, this is not the point. Go buy a fence, go buy a dog, go buy an alarm system, buy guns because you should protect yourself and all. That's not the point. But he assumes the propriety of home and self-defense, or the illustration makes no sense. See, that gives weight to it to me. He doesn't argue for self-defense. He assumes it. And I think he assumes it from Exodus 22. The Jews had the doctrine of somebody breaking into your house. You didn't serve them tea and cookies. If they were caught breaking into your house and you inflicted lethal punishment or penalty upon them, and it was nighttime, you were not held guilty. You couldn't assess their motivation. You didn't know why they were in your home. You defended home. You defended self. You defended wife. You defended family. And if in the midst of that exchange, that perpetrator died, you were not found guilty. Why is it that Christians today would at times just sound so foolish? Oh no, we can't defend our homes. We have to turn the other cheek. Jesus is not talking in the Sermon on the Mount about those sorts of things. He's talking about a nitpicking, pharisaical mindset. He is talking about the kinds of people we ought to be on a routine basis with each other. Turn the other cheek. Don't demand your rights. Don't insist on your rights. Turn the other cheek. If your brother needs something, give it to him. Don't enter it into the computer and charge him in. Just give it to him. It's the way we're supposed to function together. But when it comes to a thief breaking into your home, Jesus assumes that if the man who owned the home knew when the thief was coming, he would stop the thief. he would rebuff the thief. Now, I don't think that means tie him up in your basement and waterboard him and, you know, put things under his fingernails and just make him regret the thought that he ever had. It doesn't mean that, but it does mean defend yourself, defend your home. This is how the analogy of the illustration holds. But know this, that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into, just like the previous point. In fact, he underscores it in verse 34, you also be ready for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. What's the point? The point is watch. If you had a suspicion that somebody was coming on Friday night to break into your house and steal things and hurt people, you'd be on watch. You'd be behind the door. You'd be ready for him, right? You see what Christ is saying? Be ready. Be watchful. Don't resist these things. Don't neglect these things. Don't disregard these things. The warning of Christ concerning his coming ought to ring in all of our ears, in all of our minds, and in all of our hearts. The specific time was unknown in Jesus' response here. The temptation is for some to say, well, because we haven't seen it, because it's been 2,000 years now, and because we really don't want to see it, it's probably not going to happen. There's that wish fulfillment or that wish view of life. I don't want to believe it, so it's not going to happen. When that bad guy breaks into your house and you come home, but I didn't want to believe somebody would break into my house. Well, you know what? It's the way it goes. Sometimes things happen that you don't want to believe are going to happen. But people do that. I just don't want to think about it. Well, at least learn, whether we're in A.D. 70 and verse 36 or not, learn this, that the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 happened according to Jesus' prophecy. Again, on any reading of the Olivet Discourse, even futurists, even dispensational commentators will see and affirm that Jesus was talking about, at least to some degree, the destruction of the temple. The certainty of that judgment, according to the certainty of that prophet, ought to evidence to you the reality of the certainty of the coming judgment of God. Do not live as if there is no judgment. Do not live as if this is an atheistic world. Do not live as if what you believe or don't believe is determinative of what God does. Watch. Be ready. That's the emphasis in our passage. the judgment to come will catch people off guard. Isn't that the point? Days of Noah, eating, drinking, marrying, given in marriage, pounding nails, plumbing toilets, changing diapers, doing their thing, and not with any conscious thought that there is a God in heaven. I suspect that second coming, well, I know that second coming, based on the scriptures, is going to catch people off guard. Is it going to catch you off guard? Say the Lord Jesus did come while we were singing 599, just supposing we were going to sing it after the service. Suppose he comes out of heaven to judge the living and the dead. Are you ready? I know we preach this every week. We try to encourage people here to be ready for the coming judgment of God. I'm going to quote Luther tonight because we're going to see the imputed righteousness of Christ in our text for the Lord's Supper. And Luther made this comment. He said, I preach justification by faith every week because my people forget it every week. I think we do try to preach it every week. We try to preach the reality that there is a God. He is a holy God. There are men, women, boys, girls, and we are sinful. We have rebelled against God. All we like sheep have gone astray. There is none righteous, no, not one. There is none who fears God. And in light of that reality, we tell you the good news concerning Jesus. Jesus is God's Son. Jesus came from heaven. Jesus took on our humanity. Again, not some flesh suit covering God, but true humanity. That statement, nor the Son, ought to encourage your heart. Because He has all the essential properties of humanity. He has all the common infirmities of humanity. He wasn't an apparition. He didn't just appear to be a man. He didn't just appear to bleed. He didn't just appear to die. He didn't just appear to raise from the dead. He did those things for us men and for our salvation. He lived in light of God's law, and he obeyed it completely. He suffered, he died, and he was buried, and he was raised the third day. And this for sinners. So God is holy. You're sinful, but Christ came to save sinners. You hear this every week. Are you watchful? Are you ready? Have you closed with Christ? Have you believed the gospel? Have you looked and lived? I can't answer that. I can't make you do it. but I can set before you this Christ who is altogether lovely and chief among 10,000 and call upon you to believe, telling you that if you don't, you will suffer. You will be like those men in Noah's day that when the ark passed by, I just envision it. I'm sure certain persons drowned right by the ark. If it were me drowning as the ark was passing by, I'd probably, A, try to grab purchase onto something. If I couldn't, B, I'd probably pound it and say, let me in, let me in, let me in. Listen to Brother Ralph Barnard's sermon on that passage. That'll scare you into heaven. Father Abraham gets a tour of heaven. And Father Abraham, or after his death, he gets a tour. I'm sorry, the rich man gets a tour conducted by Father Abraham. And the rich man sees these people, let me in, let me in, let me in, let me in. He says, Father Abraham, who are those people? Oh, they're the people at the time of the flood, banging that ark trying to get in. So Abraham conducts his tour with this rich man, Lazarus. He conducts this with him. I'm sorry, it's the rich man and Lazarus. It's the rich man with Abraham. It is the rich man that is being shown that he is lost. He sees another scene. Somebody doing this. Get it off, get it off, get it off, get it off. What's that? That's Pilate trying to wash his hands clean of the blood of Jesus Christ. It's a powerful sermon, and it's Brother Rolf Barnard. You've heard Al Martin before, and you think he can bring it? Wait till you listen to Brother Rolf Barnard. He won't be your cup of tea, most likely. But if you listen to the content of what he is saying. But that scene. Let me in, let me in, let me in. people knocking on the arc trying to gain access. Where are you gonna be if Christ comes now? I didn't listen to my parents. I didn't listen to my pastors. I didn't listen to my Sunday school teacher. I didn't listen to my spouse. I didn't think it was legit. I didn't get this vibe. I didn't have the feel. We're not talking about feelings. We're not talking about vibes. We're not talking about experience. We're calling you to look and live. Look onto Jesus Christ, the Lord, and you will be saved. That's the way to be watchful. That's the way to be prepared. That's the way to be faithful. That's the way to be diligent in this interim period until the Lord Jesus Christ comes again in glory. You need to watch. You know, we're going to probably pray. We're going to probably hear the music. We're going to probably disperse and go our separate ways. And some of you won't think twice about what you heard this morning. It's really unfortunate. It's really sad. This is why we pray, God in heaven, do what we're unable to do. With man, it is impossible to save a soul, but with God, all things are possible. And in this, we rejoice. I'm not saying it's certain. But I'm saying it's possible. So please think through these things. Listen to our Lord. Understand the days of Noah. Understand the consistency with our days. Are you busy pursuing normal things? You might say, well, I'm not murdering, I'm not raping, I'm not committing adultery. But are you doing the normal? What better way to start your life off as a human being, as a child or young people? And when I address children and young people, I'm not picking on you. I don't know, you may be walking with the Lord, praise God. My experience has been Christians never get tired of the gospel. Why don't you preach the gospel to me? Praise God you preach the gospel to me. I need to hear it every day. Because if the people of God forget justification every week, all of us forget the gospel every week. I'm not picking on any young people or children, but I am encouraging you that on the authority of God's holy word, if you're not watchful, because you don't know the day and hour that your Lord is coming, you'll perish in your sin. You will suffer in hell. We're told today that those concepts don't help people, it hinders them. You can't load people up with their guilt, and you certainly can't speak of some cosmic punishment coming at the end of time. I don't care what they say. If Christ Almighty says, watch, therefore, for you don't know the hour or day the Son of Man is coming, then you need to watch, therefore. You need to be prepared, therefore. You need to be faithful, therefore. You need to be diligent, and you need to understand you're accountable to this God. So believe the gospel. Look and live. and for believers. Just close with a section from our Confession of Faith. It's a beautiful section. It says, as Christ would have us to be certainly persuaded that there shall be a day of judgment, both to deter all men from sin and for the greater consolation of the godly in their adversity. So will he have that day unknown to men, that they may shake off all carnal security and be always watchful because they know not at what hour the Lord will come and may ever be prepared to say, come Lord Jesus, come quickly, amen. Well, let us pray. Father, we thank you for the Word of God. We thank you for the clarity of our Lord Jesus Christ. If there are some issues in terms of the particular day, it is obviously clear in terms of the analogy with Noah and the illustration of this thief. Help us to be watchful people. Help us by grace to be looking unto the Lord Jesus Christ. Help us as believers to be looking forward with joy to his return. And for unbelievers, may this strike fear in their hearts, and may they fly unto Christ in faith for salvation. We ask that you would go with us now, watch over us in the remainder of this day. Be with those who are unable to be with us due to sickness or other providential reasons. We just commit them to you and to the word of your grace, and we pray through Christ Jesus our Lord. Amen.
