The Duties of Slaves
The Pastoral Epistles
We're concluding this particular section, this subsection that we find ourselves in 1 Timothy. Our duties or our treatment, our responsibilities within the church toward others. We have seen the church's responsibility toward older men, younger men, older women, and younger women. Timothy's responsibility primarily highlighted in chapter 5, verses 1 and 2. The church toward widows in verses 3. to 16, and the church toward elders in verses 17 to 25. And tonight specifically in chapter 6 verses 1 and 2, the Apostle addresses the slaves in the church and gives them their specific responsibilities or duties as they are demanded by God. So I'll just read chapter 6 verses 1 and 2 and then we'll look in detail at this section. Let as many bond servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and his doctrine may not be blasphemed. And those who have believing masters, let them not despise them because they are brethren, but rather serve them because those who are benefited are believers and beloved. teach and exhort these things. Amen. Let us pray. Father, thank you for your Word and thank you for this first epistle to Timothy and the very practical and relevant instruction for conduct in the house of God. We just pray now that you would guide us and direct us by the power of your Spirit. We pray that you would encourage our hearts and strengthen us with might in the inner man, so that Christ may dwell in our hearts through faith. As those God who are under authority, help us to recognize what you say concerning these issues. Help us to be a people that are obedient first and foremost to our God, and help us to set forth by our example a good testimony, a good witness to the ethics of the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Again, forgive us now for our sin, wash us in the blood, give us the Holy Spirit so that we may understand your word. And we pray through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. Well, slavery is addressed several times in the New Testament. If you look specifically at verse 1, it says, "...let as many bond-servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor." That's a legitimate translation of the Greek word, but the better translation is slaves. That is the class to whom the apostle is addressing his comments at this particular time. Specifically in verse 1, he's dealing with Christian slaves who have non-Christian masters. And in verse 2, he's dealing with Christian slaves who have Christian masters. And as we look at this passage, because we don't currently have slavery in operation around us, it probably puzzles us. It probably concerns us to a certain degree or other. Very often, at least in North America, our only understanding of slavery is that which was practiced in the American South in the early centuries ago. but when we look at the scriptures we see that there are two types of slavery there is a obviously unlawful type of slavery the scripture says you're not to kidnap and in the context in Deuteronomy it's probably not a child is taken and held hostage for a ransom payment. But probably the kidnapping in view was man-stealing for the express purpose of putting that person into slavery. That's more akin to what happened in that slavery situation in America. So, stealing men and then treating them like chattel, treating them like property, is condemned in the Bible. But when we look at the type of slavery that's in operation here, Paul neither commends it, nor does he condemn it, but rather he regulates it according to the principles of God's Holy Word in keeping with what we find in the Old Testament Scriptures as well. In the Old Testament there was slavery. Again it was regulated. God spoke to it. God protected the innocent by putting into place particular safeguards so that slaves would not be abused so that they would not be treated as property, and so that they would not be hurt or suffer in this transaction. Very often in the New Testament setting, we need to understand that slavery was very, very popular in the Roman Empire. There was a lot of people that were slaves. In fact, they wanted to make uniforms for the slaves, but they fought against it, or at least this was a theory at one time. to make uniforms for slaves, but because they were so numerous, they didn't want them to know how many there actually were, lest there be an uprising by the slaves against the man, if you will. But not every instance was freedom something sought after. Oftentimes people were slaves because they couldn't do certain things, they didn't have a trade, they didn't have a way of making money, And so slavery was an option for that, to be paid. This wasn't as if they weren't being paid. There was some sort of recompense in view, but it wasn't as if they were getting rich. But nevertheless, the ideal was to not be a slave. the believers in Corinth, in 1 Corinthians chapter 7, very specifically, were you called while a slave, do not be concerned about it, but if you can be made free, rather use it. So that's the Apostle's statement concerning that whole reality. So let's look in detail here at verses 1 and 2. As I said, First, the slaves with non-Christian masters, and secondly, the slaves with Christian masters. Note verse 1. I've already mentioned that slaves is the preferred statement. 1 Corinthians 7, 20-22, the Apostle deals with, or at least alludes to it. In Ephesians 6, 5-9, the Apostle not only gives instructions for slaves, but he also gives instructions for masters. why he doesn't replicate or duplicate those instructions for masters here in 1st Timothy 6, we need to remember that it's the same audience. Perhaps there was a problem among the slaves. Remember that Ephesus received the letter to the Ephesians, where those things are treated, both slavery and the masters. Well, where is Timothy? he is operating in Macedonia, specifically in Ephesus. And so this particular church had received instruction, so maybe the case was that this was a bit of a turmoil amongst the slaves in the congregation, and so Paul needs to speak to that particular contingency. Slavery is dealt with in Colossians chapter 3, verses 22 to 25. Titus chapter 2, verses 9 and 10. 1 Peter chapter 2, verses 18 to 20. where Peter says that slaves must be submissive to their masters, not just to the good ones, not just to the nice ones, but to those who were harsh. And as well, the book of Philemon is about slavery. So it is a prevalent theme in the New Testament scriptures. As I've already mentioned, slavery was an integral part of the social and economic world of the first century. Freedom and liberation were not as much an obvious good in the first century that it is in the 21st century. Again, our mindset and our conception of what's going on at times. is challenged based on our particular context. The first century Christians were a small group living within an all-powerful authoritarian empire. Social action in that context wasn't the first order of business. They didn't go out picketing the institution of slavery. They had other fish to fry at this particular time, like not being executed for the cause of Christ, the Lord. And then as well, while it shouldn't be viewed the way that slavery was carried out, it's not just America that practiced a man-stealing, shadow-slavery type thing. This is not something only common in that environment. It's happened throughout history. While it ought not to be viewed the same way in the New Testament Scripture, it ought not to be viewed in a positive light either. I mean, you were still basically the property of another person. And so that would present as a struggle to the one who was in fact a slave. Now notice the duty toward unbelieving masters. let as many bondservants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor. The slave is to actively consider, to reckon, to deem, specifically his master, as worthy of all honor. When we ask the question, what does it mean honor, does it just mean respect? Well, in the context, in verse 3, widows are to be honored. That means some tangible financial assistance is to be given to them. In verse 17, let the elders who rule well be counted worthy of double honor. That doesn't mean they get two parking spots. It doesn't mean they get a gold pen on their birthday. It means that they are paid for services rendered. So when we look here, the idea is not that the slave pays the master, but it is a concrete, tangible product that he is engaging in, specifically faithful and diligent service to the master. The slave might be tempted to think, as Calvin says, thus slaves who have unbelieving masters are ready enough with the objection that it is unreasonable that they who serve the devil, my unbelieving master, should have dominion over the children of God. Paul says that isn't your concern. Your task is to do what you're supposed to do, regardless of the spiritual condition of your master. This is very clear in this passage. They are to count their own masters worthy of all honor. And I think that fundamentally, something that we struggle with as well, this may be a preacher's we, it may not apply to you, you may be that person that has no problem with authority whatsoever, you have no problem with submission whatsoever, but there's a lot of us in the Christian church that do struggle with this, so I'm going to speak to us. I think again Calvin is right when he says, owing to the false opinion of his own excellence, which every person entertains, there is no one who patiently endures that others should rule over him. Listen to what he's saying here. Why do you think Paul is having to write 1st Timothy 6.1? Because all the slaves always did what they were supposed to do for their masters. Absolutely not! He's having to address a problem. I think Calvin hits the nail on the head. The issue in our heart of hearts is this lack of submission to lawful authority over us. We don't like for someone else to have the rule over us. He says, they who cannot avoid the necessity, that means of being subject to others, do indeed reluctantly obey those who are above them, but inwardly they fret and rage because they think that they suffer wrong. The Apostle cuts off by a single word all disputes of this kind by demanding that all who live under the yoke shall submit to it willingly. This is what the Apostle says. If you have an unbelieving master, you cannot conclude, he is not worthy of my service. Paul says just the opposite. If he's an unbelieving master, he is worthy of your service, because the condition of the one you serve does not affect the demand that God has placed on you. That's the bottom line. We are always called to obey God no matter what the particular situation is. Now, we can qualify this if the master is this or the master is that. There may be instances and issues where we can resist those things, but insofar as the master is not commanding the servant to send then the slave must count them as worthy of all honor. And consider the reality that all of us are subject to someone else in one form or another. See, it's never an issue, submission or non-submission, in the Christian life. I think that at times we hear that passage in Ephesians 5, wives, be submissive to your own husbands, and there's something in us that recoils against that reality. Well, consider, the church needs to submit to Christ. We all agree with that, don't we? The Christian must submit to God, James 4. The Christian, be they man or woman, must submit to the governing authorities, Romans chapter 13, 1 Peter chapter 2. The wife must submit to her husband. But the husband, according to Ephesians 5.20, along with everybody, must submit to one another in the fear of God. In other words, Christian to Christian, there ought to be this sort of submission, deference, giving preference to other persons. In the first letter of the Apostle Peter, he speaks of submission to God-ordained human authorities. We need to submit to government, servants and masters, he speaks in marriage, he speaks concerning all of life. Consider the reality that our Lord Jesus Christ was submissive, that he was one that was willingly under authority, first and foremost, to his Heavenly Father. He always did the will of his Father. He didn't balk at, he didn't scoff at, he didn't resist, he didn't say, Lord, this is unfair, it's unrighteous, it's ungodly, you are not worthy of my service in this instance. No, he always did that which was pleasing to the Lord. But consider as well our blessed Christ. He had earthly parents. What does Luke tell us in Luke 2? He is found teaching in the temple at the age of 12. His parents come and they express concern to him that he was not with them. He says, do you not know that I must be about my father's will? And so then they want to take him home, and the scripture says he continued in subjection to them. So for us to say, well, you just don't know my master, you just don't know my husband. Now again, if husband or master is abusive, there's the qualification. You don't have to submit to that sort of thing. But our Lord Christ submitted to non-perfect earthly authority. And not just his earthly parents. As we continue in the Gospel of Matthew, there will be an instance where Peter comes along, talks about taxes. Jesus says, go and find that fish and take out the money so you can pay the taxes to Caesar. You know, there are those who think that resisting paying income taxes is a righteous cause. Well, it might be a righteous cause to pursue in a righteous way. But if we ask the question, what does God say concerning that? Paul is very clear in Romans 13, pay your taxes. Jesus paid his taxes to an unlawful, godless authority. He didn't say, well, they're pagans, I'm not going to pay my taxes. The Lord Christ submitted willingly in these various spheres. So when we go back to 1st Timothy chapter 6, and we hear Paul's word to these slaves, believing slaves under the yoke, count their own masters, their unbelieving masters, worthy of all honor. Now note the reason that he gives for this direction. It's theological as we would expect from the Apostle Paul. It's not pragmatic. It's not, count them worthy so that you'll get benefit, count them worthy so that you'll get preferential treatment, count them worthy so that you'll get a parking space, count them worthy so that you'll get a free ham, count them worthy so that you'll get a bonus at Christmas time. That's not it. The apostle argues theologically. And what is at stake in the slave's conduct toward his non-Christian master but the name of God and the doctrine of God. Theology proper, the way that we view God, the way that we conduct ourselves in the presence of God, the vertical affects the horizontal. But as well, the horizontal and the way that we conduct ourselves with man reflects upon the vertical. If we are bad, insubordinate, lazy, disrespectful slaves, what happens? There is blasphemy cast upon the name of our God. Imagine for a moment that you had a friend, and he owned a particular business, and your friend phoned you, and your friend said, do you know anybody that you could recommend for a job at my establishment? And you say, yes, I want you to hire this particular person. I won't give a name because I don't want anybody to say, is he singling me out? No, I'm not. But imagine, you send your friend, you say, hey, there's a job for you, you go down there, you fill out the application, he will hire you and you do a good job. Why would you tell him, you do a good job? Because the employer if that employee doesn't work out, is probably not going to have fond thoughts of you. In other words, if you send a man, you recommend him for a particular job, and he turns out to be lazy, he turns out to be insubordinate, he turns out to be a pathetic whiner, what does that do but reflect upon you, who recommended him for that job? That's the Apostle's mindset. There is something bigger at stake than your personal happiness in your workplace. There is something more important than you getting preferential treatment. There is something more valuable than your place as a free man in society. And that which is more valuable is the name of God. If you go in and you disobey God, you will give cause to the enemies of God to blaspheme His holy name. It's intriguing when you consider slavery. I don't think it's an illogical jump into the 21st century in North America to consider being an employee. While this doesn't address the same sorts of situations in an employer-employee relationship, certainly we can argue from a slave-master relationship to an employee-employer relationship. Have you ever considered the doctrine of work with reference to the Decalogue? We all would consider the doctrine of work with reference to the fourth word, wouldn't we? The fourth word not only enjoins upon us a day of rest, but it also tells us to work hard for six days, doesn't it? You see, the fourth commandment isn't just a blessing in terms of a gift from God, but there's a supposition or an assumption or an implication with reference to that blessed gift of rest from God. The implication of the supposition is, is that you've worked hard for six days. So we say naturally our employment is somehow connected to the fourth word. When we take a passage like this and we give it just a bit of thought, we can certainly see how being an employee is related to the eighth commandment. We ought not to steal if our employer trusts us with things. We ought not to pocket it. We ought not to run off at lunchtime and steal from him. We ought not to steal his property. We certainly ought not to steal his time. If he's paying us for eight hours, we ought to serve him for eight hours. So we see the fourth commandment, we see the eighth commandment, we see the fifth commandment as well. You say, well, where does it say honor your father and your mother in this passage? The best interpreters in the history of the church saw the fifth word as not just relative to the parent-child relationship, but to all manner of authority. In other words, when you're out on the road and the speed limit sign says, go 60 kilometers an hour, that's the fifth word. You need to understand that you are subject to lawful authority, even if you disagree with it. Do you think it should be 65? Write your MP. If you think it should be 70, write your MP. But the issue is, you are not supposed to blow through those things under the guise of, well, it's my liberty. No, you're a man under the Fifth Commandment. But if we follow the logic of the text, we follow the apostle's argument, we follow his reasoning, we must see the third word as well. You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain." Well, certainly if I'm a lazy, insubordinate, disrespectful servant, or slave, or employee to my master, and it causes that master to speak ill of my master, well then I am assisting someone, I am complicit in the violation of the Third Commandment. You see, God's word is practical. It is relative. The Decalogue has abiding influence in the lives of the children of God Most High. So the apostle says, so that the name of God and his doctrine may not be blasphemed. The doctrine. Consider that in this particular context, the Christian slave may have been the non-Christian master, non-Christian masters, only exposure to Christianity. The only one! The non-Christian master would say, yes, I've got one of those new ones, that new set, that new religion. Remember, it's not like it is today, where there's churches on every single corner, and where, to a large degree, in North America, even the most paganized man or woman around us has had some contact, maybe it's minuscule, but some contact with Christianity in some form. That was not the case in the Roman Empire. So for a Christian slave to be disrespectful, to be lazy, to be insubordinate to a non-Christian master, the non-Christian master would conclude, why would I want the gospel? Why would I want the Lordship of Jesus Christ? If coming to Christ produces that type of slave, you can keep it. Paul says, don't do that. If this is the man's only exposure to the word of truth, then make sure you are exposing him properly. Now note, secondly, slaves with Christian masters. Verse two, and those slaves who have believing masters. Those slaves who have believing masters. What ought to be apparent before we even proceed from this point forward? Christians had slaves. Paul doesn't commend it. Paul doesn't condemn it. Paul simply speaks to the current situation and regulates it so that it functions in a manner that is consistent with biblical ethics. So there was a class of Christian slaves in Ephesus who had Christian masters. We know this in addition to Ephesians 6. Paul's addressing masters on how they're to conduct themselves to the slaves. Do you think he's addressing pagan masters in the context? I just hope every pagan master out there will actually... No, he's talking to Christians. He's writing to the church. Same in Colossae. He is addressing Christian masters on how they ought to conduct themselves toward their Christian slaves. Well, here, he's just dealing with the slaves. Note the prohibition. Verse 2, those who have believing masters, let them not despise them. Let them not despise them. Do not think down on them. The word means to treat without the full consideration due to the other man's station. Don't despise them. Don't disregard them. Don't look down upon them. Don't go home at night and put his picture up on your wall and throw darts at his face. Now, note what Paul says. Do not do this, and then there's a purpose clause. Those who have believing masters, let them not despise them because they are brethren. Now, is Paul saying, do not despise them, and the reason I don't want you to despise them is because they're brethren? I don't think so. I think he's saying, don't despise them because they're brethren. In other words, the fact that they are brethren, that they are Christian masters over Christian slaves, ought not to be the reason why you despise them. Perhaps some of the slaves had read Galatians 3, 28. where they see that the gospel is the great leveler. The gospel reduces man. There's no more Jew. There's no more Gentile. There's no more male. There's no more female. There's no more of these distinctions. Speaking to redemptive benefit in the Lord Jesus Christ. But what Paul says in Galatians 3.28 does not eradicate social distinction. Everybody with me? Maybe the slaves got that in their head. We're brothers now. Certainly I can't be your servant anymore. I'm your brother. Maybe the slave thought he should get preferential treatment. If the Christian master has ten slaves and one of them happens to be Christian, perhaps that Christian slave is thinking to himself, he ought to be extra specially good to me because we're brethren. And if that didn't occur, what would happen in the mind and in the heart of the slave? He would despise him. He would look down upon him. He would say, this is not legitimate. This is unfair. Doesn't he realize? I'm a blood-bought child of God. I'm on the same level redemptively as him. Yes, but you're not on the same level socio-economically. The Gospel hasn't obliterated those particular things. and because you are a slave to this man, serve him, labor unto him, do what he calls you to do. The slave might as well think the master should pat his wallet and send him on his way as a free man." So Paul's argument is very clear. Do not despise them because they're brethren. Now note the positive exhortation, but rather serve them. Serve the master. Don't whine, don't complain, don't grumble. Is there any of that in our hearts when somebody actually does better than us, instead of us rejoicing with them, we get upset? Oh no, not me. No one's envious ever. You all remember my fish story of envy? Fishing with my cousin in Oregon. He caught three trout, I caught none. He was so happy, he's bragging, he's boasting. He walks down the river and I took the stringer out and I let his fish go. That's envy, brother. Not jealousy. I wasn't just jealous that he caught them and I didn't. Envy is jealousy plus a desire to deprive the other person. Could that be what Paul is addressing? You're jealous and envious of this man's success? Do you find yourself as an employee to a successful Christian employer? Do you begrudge him for that? Obviously he's worked hard, he's been blessed, things have happened in his particular way. The bottom line is it doesn't matter what he is doing, other than if he's sinning, it's what you're supposed to do. Our personal ethics are always dictated to us by God the Lord. It is not contingent upon the behavior of the other person. Paul doesn't say husbands love your wives as long as they are all together lovely. Husbands love your wives when they make you omelets. Husbands love your wives when they fan you on a hot day. Husbands love your wives when they feed grapes to you on an equally hot day. That's not what I want when I go home, by the way. Omelets and grapes and fanning. Fanning, maybe. I'll take that. Husbands love your wives. That's it. You don't know my wife. Husbands love your wife. You see, more research needs to be done on the front end. I'm absolutely convinced. Take the time. Be patient. Find a spouse you can love to the end. If somebody ends up saying, well, you just don't know my wife, then you didn't know your wife and you should have taken the time. How many people say, I do, and they're not ready? How many people jump into a situation, you mean I got to submit to that guy? Yes, from the very beginning you were told this. From the very beginning you knew this. From your youth you were told this. That's a sideline note. Let's get back to the slaves here. But there could have been this envious spirit. So what's Paul's remedy? Serve them. Serve them. Don't whine, don't grumble, don't complain, because ultimately it's against God. Note what he goes on to say, rather serve them because those who are benefited are believers and beloved. There's one of two ways this verse can go. I think some of the versions unfortunately might represent the wrong way. The wrong way says, those who are benefited are the slaves, therefore serve your benefactors. In other words, as a slave, you are a benefactor from their provision to you, therefore serve them. I don't think that's what's in view. I think the idea is, as the New King James captures it, but rather serve them because Those who are benefited, the masters, are believers and beloved. Who do you want to have your service more? Some pagan, godless wretch that worships Baal, or in this context, worships Diana? Or do you want your service to go to a man who fears God? A man who loves the Lord Jesus Christ? A man who is lockstep serving the Savior of sinners? Well, certainly you ought to want to serve that man. When you go home at night, you say, I did my master good. I was diligent. I was faithful. I want him to be benefited. I want him to progress. I want him to succeed. That's the disposition that we find in our Lord Jesus Christ, who incidentally is held up as a paradigm to slaves in 1 Peter 2. What do we learn of Christ? The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve and to give His life a ransom for many. Paul ends verse 2 by saying, teach and exhort these things. The UBS Great New Testament puts this with what follows. Perhaps some of the versions puts this with what follows. I take it as that which proceeds. We see a similar usage in 1st Timothy 4.11. These things command and teach. I think the previous, that warning against apostasy, the service of the servant of the Lord in verses 6 to 10, these things command and teach. So when we look at the end of verse 2, teach and exhort these things, it looks back to the context. This is where I want us to see something very important. I know it's hot. And I know this is probably not as exciting as Gideon going in to destroy Midianites. I get that. But for the Apostle Paul, he wanted Timothy to take the time to teach and exhort the church how pastors were to relate to old men, to young men, to old women, to young women. He wanted Timothy to take the time to teach and exhort the church so that they would know how to deal with widows in their midst. He wanted Timothy to take the time to teach and exhort so that the church would know how to deal with elders in their midst. He wanted Timothy to take the time to teach and exhort so that the Christian slaves in their midst would be educated in school and how they could best serve their masters, be they unbelieving or believing. What's the point? The point is this is where we're at. This is garden variety, basic Christianity 101. Jesus says, by this all men will know that you are my disciples if you have love for one another. The way that pastors treat brethren, the way the church treats the widows, the way the church treats elders, the way that slaves treat masters, All of that gives evidence that we are the disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ. He doesn't spend all of this time in 1 Timothy 5 and in 1 Timothy 6 seeking to inculcate people for far-off Christian service to the heathen. There are texts and passages that we can glean from the New Testament, but that's not where the emphasis falls. It is more often than not the mundane, routine, garden-variety, day-in, day-out type of Christianity that Paul says teach and exhort these things. Make sure that these slaves, when they go to work in the morning, they do what they're supposed to do because the name of God is at stake. Make sure they do what they're supposed to do because their Christian master's benefit is at stake. So that's the conclusion of the exposition. Just a couple of thoughts and then we close. First, the Apostle and slavery. Because this is such a hot topic, you'll hear this as a Christian when you're out defending the faith. People will say, well the Bible has slavery. Yes, the Bible does have slavery, but we need to understand what type of slavery, and we need to realize that God regulated the type of slavery that was in place. God condemns man-stealing. God condemns man-stealing. Again, the little child that's held for ransom certainly falls under that particular prohibition. but probably what's in view is stealing people to make them slaves. God abominates that. He regulates that. He calls for the death penalty in those particular instances. So if anyone ever says to you, well, the Bible says, is there slavery? Well, yeah. And God says, if you carry it out unlawfully, you ought to be executed. I mean, that will open up a whole other can of worms, but be ready to go down that road too. The Apostle addressed slaves as image bearers of God. He doesn't discount them like property. I think it was Plato or Aristotle, one of those philosophers referred to slaves as tools. You have a shovel in your shed, you have a Makita power drill in your work tool kit, That's how slaves were regarded, just an implement, just a tool to accomplish the task. Not so in God's Word. They are addressed as human beings, image-bearers of the living God. And as a result, they have responsibility. As well, as I've mentioned, the Apostle does not commend and he does not condemn slavery. He calls for the regulation of an existing practice through the power of the Christian gospel. The Apostle obviously recognizes the benefit of freedom. 1 Corinthians 7 verse 21. If you can secure your freedom, then do it. That's a good thing. As well, the Apostle gave specific instructions for Christian slaves with non-Christian masters and Christian slaves with Christian masters. And he grounded this instruction in theology proper. What we do this way affects what happens concerning God, but what men think and say concerning God. Secondly, as I've already mentioned, while the text deals with slaves to masters, certainly employees ought to take notice of a passage like this. If a first century slave was told not to be insubordinate, was told not to be lazy, was told not to be a whiner, was told not to be a grumbler, was told not to despise his master, especially if it was because the master was a brother, and the slave thought, therefore he owes me things. If all that is true, then what about employees today? Certainly, we ought not to be lazy. We ought not to be insubordinate. We ought not to be disrespectful. We ought not to be thieves. We ought not to be those who are lazy. But rather, we ought to be diligent and earnest and faithful Christians. And then a final note concerning slavery is that slavery is one of those concepts that is inevitable. It is inevitable. You might be a free man. in concerning your temporal affairs. You may be a slave spiritually. The Bible speaks not only of temporal slavery and of the responsibilities of slaves to masters, but the Bible also speaks of a slavery that is even more systemic, something that is even more troublesome for those who are slaves this way. Jesus said in John 8, 34, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. So while you may be a free man, a free woman, laboring unto the pursuit of your own ends and your own goods and your own stuff, if you are not in Christ tonight, you are a slave. You are in bondage. It may not look that way. It may not feel that way. You may not be wearing shackles. You may not be eating gruel out of a bowl with a piece of wood instead of a nice spoon. But nevertheless, you are a slave. And Christ highlighted the only way of redemption. He says, if you abide in my word, you are my disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. He says in John 8, 36, Therefore, if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed. So these first Timothy 6, one in two men, though they were slaves to earthly masters, they were liberated concerning the heavenly master. May it not be the case for us that we are temporally free, but spiritually bound. Christ is the way of salvation. Believe on him and you will be saved. Well, let us pray. Father, thank you for your word and the fact that it speaks to each and every area of our lives. And we pray that you would just go with us now, watch over the brethren in this congregation. Cause your face to shine upon us and may your peace always flood our hearts. Grant us the power of your spirit that we may pursue those things which are pleasing in your sight. And whether we are employers or employees, help us to work hard, help us to do so for the glory and the honor of our God. And we pray through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
