Ask FGBC #4: Is accepting salvation a choice? (Hyper-Calvinism)
Ask FGBC Anything
I got a question from somebody, and I think it's a legitimate question from somebody that people struggle with these kinds of questions, right? For years, for years. Is accepting salvation a choice? I know we can't merit salvation by works, and I know salvation is by grace, but is that offered to all of us, or can only the elected accept it? Okay, I would say that yes, it is a choice. Now I need to qualify that because sinners outside of faith in Jesus Christ, the Bible says they're dead. They're not limping along, they're not a little crippled, but rather they are dead in their trespasses and sins. So what must happen is that they must be born again. The Holy Spirit must regenerate them. And when the Spirit does that, the Spirit grants the graces of faith and repentance. so that you and I choose for Jesus. But again, we need to qualify it. We choose because God opened our hearts. God gave us new hearts, to use the language of the prophet Ezekiel. He took out the old stony heart, put in a new fleshly heart, put a disposition in us such that now we see Jesus in all of His glory and offices, and we, by God's grace, believe on Him. So, strictly speaking or generally speaking, yeah, it's a choice. but it's a choice because God made us willing in the day of His power. The other question or part of the question has to do with what we call in theology the general or external call of the gospel and then the internal or effectual call of the gospel. So, Jesus is clear in Matthew 28 and in Mark chapter 16 that we are to preach the gospel to every creature. indiscriminately go preach the gospel to every creature under heaven. So, we call men, or we tell men the truth as it is in Jesus, life, death, resurrection, and then we call upon them to believe that gospel. So, everybody hears the word, or everybody should hear the word, That's one of the things the church is trying to do. We want Bible translators, we want missionaries, we want people to take the word out to the heathen and the bush so that everybody hears the gospel. But there is this effectual call, and that goes back to the first part of the question. Why do some choose? Well, they've been effectually called by God. So, that new birth or regeneration, the granting of the graces of faith and repentance has occurred, and it occurs to the elect. It occurs to those that Paul describes in Ephesians 1. He says, Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ. And then he praises that one true and living God. Specifically, the three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, for the work of salvation. And he attributes sovereign election and predestination in Ephesians 1 to the Father. He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world. He says, in love, having predestined us unto adoption as sons by Jesus Christ. So, we choose because God chose us. So, general call, go out, preach the gospel to every creature under heaven. That's your duty. That's your responsibility. That's your great privilege. The internal or effectual call is the purpose of God to save through Christ those whom He has predestined. I think we can distinguish between the act of faith and the object of faith. I think the Bible is very clear that, as Pastor Butler said, it's a gift of God. Ephesians 2 does say that it's the gift of God, it is not of works. Yet nonetheless, as we read in the book of Acts, I mean, especially with the Philippian jailer, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. He's called to act. He's called to believe. He's called to look to the object of his faith, which is Christ Jesus. And so, but that has to, but the gift comes first. The regeneration precedes the gift of the believing, the act of believing. And one theologian said that regeneration is life implanted, and then faith is the life act. And that all happens, I believe, at once, that conversion, regeneration, faith, all happens at that one time. But it's important to see that we must be born again. It's a passive in John 3. make ourselves born again, and that precedes faith. We also have to understand that predestination, to use the language of man, precedes regeneration. I think the question seems to be, do we choose God or does God choose us? And in reality, they are, I guess, different categories and different times, again, speaking in the manner of men. Predestination happens in eternity, and God decrees whom he will save. And so, we see regeneration and faith happen in time and space. And so, as Pastor Butler said, we chose God because he first chose us before the foundation of the world. Yeah, I agree with that. I know kind of the background of where these questions come from. And I've heard that in sermons in the past, is that choosing, believing is a work and you're adding to your salvation. You can't ask to be 100% God. But faith is the, how do you say that again, the instrument that receives? That's right. It's the empty hand that receives the gift. You know, nothing in my hand I bring, simply to thy cross I cling. You know, in Philippians chapter 2, the apostle says, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. You can only work out what God has placed there. He's not saying work for your own salvation. Then he says, for it is God who is at work in you both to will and to do according to his good pleasure. The idea of us willing necessarily involves choice. We choose to drink water, we choose to drink coffee, we choose to believe the gospel, but again, not in an unqualified Arminian free will sense, but because God foreordained or predestined from before the foundation of the world that we should. And then in time, through the preaching of the gospel, the means that he's ordained, he grants us those graces of faith and repentance so that yes, we do choose for Jesus but not in an unqualified sort of a way. And you see this emphasis in Acts. So, in Acts 13, you have this statement in verse 48 that all those who were appointed to eternal life believed, okay? It wasn't that they believed and then were appointed to eternal life. They were appointed to eternal life and they believed. And then later in Acts, so that's Acts 13, then Acts 16, you've got Paul at the riverside in Philippi, and there the Lord opened Lydia's heart to receive the things that were spoken by the apostle Paul. but sort of smack dab right in the middle. You've got 13 there, appoint, believe, open heart, believe. In 14.1, the apostles so spoke that a great multitude believed. So, the scriptures don't have that sort of hyper-Calvinism or Arminianism about them, where they got to smooth off what they perceive to be rough edges. Well, you know, I don't know that we could say God so loves the world, that might seem to indicate universalism. The biblical authors don't do that, and the biblical authors treat the truth because it's truth. So, on the one hand, they're appointed and they believe. On the one hand, she opens, or God opens her heart so that she believes. But on the other hand, the apostles could preach. And because they could preach, a great multitude believed. That doesn't mitigate sovereignty. It simply underscores that the sovereign God ordains not only the ends, the salvation of sinners, but the means, good preaching, attending the Word of God, reading it for yourself, listening to your parents read it. All those things are calculated or means given by God to bring about His purposed end. It's a beautiful thing. It's a great thing. It's a wonderful thing. So, we shouldn't be rationalists in our attempt to explain away, you know, large swaths of the Scriptures. Yes. I think the other thing behind this question is there's a fear of being deceived that we've made that choice. We're following Jesus and we're doing all the good things. But to get to Judgment Day and be like, oh no, you weren't actually elect, so you lived the life of a Christian. You thought you were safe, but you weren't. Yeah. And that that runs deep, that one. Oh, for sure. It does. And I and I sympathize. I do. It's not it's not this isn't trite. It's not. Well, you know, buck up, suck it up, just to be a better you. No, no, I get that. You're conditioned. Basically, you're you're you're sort of indoctrinated that, you know, if you have a degree of joy or or comfort or assurance, the the warning and the wagging finger is always there. Make sure you're not deceived. And I do sympathize, and I think the way to deal with that ultimately is just to keep the objectivity of the cross in view. You know, our comfort, our assurance is ultimately not our feelings. It's not ultimately our good works or fruits or anything like that, but it's the objectivity of the cross. I love the other hymn that we sing. I think it's Edward Mote. He says, my hope is built on nothing less than Jesus' blood and righteousness. He says, I dare not trust the sweetest frame, but wholly lean on Jesus' name. You and I both know sweet frames come and sweet frames go. And our assurance will come and go with those frames. Now, you need to look to Christ. You need to look to the Christ of the gospel, the one who lived, the one who died, the one who was raised again. I think that's the first place we go for that assurance and for that, you know, confidence, if I can use that word, that we're not deceiving ourselves. I would suggest, secondly, you know, there's an old maxim, all that glitters is not gold, right? But gold does glitter. And so, you know, cross first, and then the reality, you know, there's consequences of us having, by God's grace, believed the gospel. And I think John treats those things in 1 John, you know, a pursuit of righteousness and Now, again, pagans do outwardly righteous things, so this isn't sure fire, this isn't sure shot because, again, pagans will do, you know, nice things. So, you can't necessarily argue yourself into the kingdom, but if all that glitters is not gold, you've got to realize gold does glitter and there will be fruits to a degree and consequences with reference to a justifying faith in Jesus. So, I would suggest, first, the objectivity of the cross, secondly, those fruits that are consistent with that, and then, you know, most importantly, the testimony of the Holy Spirit. He really is, you know, with us. And, I mean, And some good expectations or some biblical expectations, I've often tried to explain that, you know, when you become a believer in Jesus Christ, you're still you. I mean, you're a new creature. All things have passed and, you know, all things are new in terms of redemption, in terms of category, in terms of covenant, in terms of all that. But I'm still 5'9". I'm not 6'2". I'm still scrambled up in the way that I was. So, these expectations of what does new life in Jesus Christ look like, it's not going to add inches to your height. It's not going to add digits to your bank account. It's not going to add, you know, a brand new perspective on everything. I don't want to say lower your expectations, but have a healthy understanding that you're still going to have struggles. There's still going to be depressing days. There's still going to be challenges in the Christian life. And don't immediately conclude, well, I must not be a believer then. I think at times, and I don't mean to be callous or, you know, unkind to the questioner, at times that can be a weaselly sort of way out. You know, it's easier to, you know, I can't believe I did such and such today. I must be deceiving myself. No. You're a believer in Christ that needs to own the fact that you've sinned and go to the blessed advocate with the Father, even Jesus Christ the righteous. Fetch out fresh forgiveness, go on, and don't continue in that pattern anymore. You know, if every time a believer sins, the reflex response is, well, I must not be a believer. I'm not reading that Bible. You know, the good that I wish to do, I don't do, Paul says in Romans 7. The evil I don't want to do, I find myself doing. What's he saying in Galatians 5? For the flesh lusts against the spirit, spirit against the flesh. These two are contrary to one another so that you don't do the things that you want. There is this remaining corruption in the heart of God's people, and I'm not justifying that. I agonize over that. I don't appreciate that. But I'm suggesting that your behavior or your performance or your thought of where you're at relative to Jesus, thankfully, isn't what brings you to heaven. It's the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. It is his life, his death, and his resurrection. So, I would say the more you understand the glories of the cross, the more the pathway to assurance is accessible. And if I could add to that, you mentioned 1 John twice. I call it the book of assurance. I'm sure somebody else in the past has called it that as well. But John does write to believers and says, I write that you might know that you have eternal life, those who believe in his name. And Pastor Butler mentioned, you know, 1 John 2. But the verse that precedes that, John says, little children do not sin. And then he says, if you do. And so the implication seems to be that we are going to sin. And the context of 1 John are those who thought they didn't have sin, those who thought that they were fine and everything was great. And not only do we measure our performance against Christ, I think, unfortunately, we measure our performance against other people as well. And that doesn't do anything for us. And so I just like the way John words that, little children do not sin, but if you do, We have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the Righteous. So, Christ still, as our High Priest, He still pleads for us, and it's based upon His finished work. And John goes on to say that when he says, Jesus Christ the Righteous, and He is the propitiation for His people, He turns out the sacrifice for His people. not only for our sins, but for the sins of the whole world. And I do think that is referring to not just the elite, not just the apostles, not just those with PhDs in theology, but even for those that do not, that there is an advocate and Christ's work is sufficient. So, John is a great book for those struggling with assurance, 1 John. I would just like to sort of piggyback off that and say there's a great responsibility in terms of preaching. If a preacher holds up a particular man in history and parades him as sort of the man to aspire after, to follow, to be like, you know, this man He agonized over his sin for 15 years. This man, you know, finally got relief in Jesus, but from then on, all he ever did was struggle. The preacher's job is to hold up one man, and that's the God-man, the Word who became flesh. who dwelt among us, we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth." When we parade, now again, as a father, I might say to my child, you know, you ought to be more like your older brother. I shouldn't do that a lot, but you know, there's a place perhaps for that. But preaching that celebrates the accomplishment of Christian men beyond saying, you know, this brother, you know, Spurgeon, useful man, wonderful brother, John Owen, you know, the guys on the shelf there, Turretin, Van Maastricht, we love to read those men. But that's a far cry different than you need in terms of your coming to Jesus. It needs to model or be parallel or look a lot like this. The Bible doesn't do that. The Bible doesn't give us sort of a paradigm for every single converted person. And perhaps that kind of preaching is calculated or, you know, probably unwittingly to produce this idea of deception, to produce this idea of a lack of assurance. In other words, if I'm aspiring to be like some hero in the faith, and I'm not looking to the objectivity of the cross, I'm going to be in dire straits. Well, you know, my life doesn't look like this one's life. Nowhere in the Bible does it say your life has to look like this one's. So, some preaching may be, you know, in a way promoting, producing, resulting in that sort of a thing. So, examples in the Christian life, good. Biography, good. Autobiography, good. All that's great. But don't make that the paradigm for everybody else, and if everybody else doesn't sort of measure up to that, then they mustn't be saved. Because the Bible doesn't do that.
