2LCF Chapter 24 - Of the Civil Magistrate
1689 London Baptist Confession
Let's pray. Heavenly Father, we thank You for this time that we have on this, Your Lord's Day now. Prior to worship, to study truth, we pray that You would help us in this, help us to hallow Your name, help us to honor this day, help us to be resting upon the illumination of the Holy Spirit as we study Your Word. We pray that You would help us that you would strengthen us in truth, and that we would be preparing our hearts as we look forward to worship, to enter into worship, to worship the one and only living and true God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and to rejoice in our precious Savior, Jesus Christ. And we pray in His name. Amen. We're in chapter 24 now, so you can turn there, chapter 24. Does anyone need a confession? Excellent. So we looked at Of Lawful Oaths and Vows last time. We're now in the chapter concerning the Civil Magistrate. It's a very short chapter. Concise, but as always, thorough in its concision. I'll read the three paragraphs and then we'll have a look at this particular doctrine and chapter. God the Supreme Lord and King of all the world hath ordained civil magistrates to be under him, over the people, for his own glory and the public good. And to this end hath armed them with the power of the sword for defense and encouragement of them that do good and for the punishment of evildoers. It is lawful for Christians to accept and execute the office of a magistrate when called thereunto, in the management whereof, as they ought especially to maintain justice and peace, according to the wholesome laws of each kingdom and commonwealth. So for that end, they may lawfully now, under the New Testament, wage war upon just and necessary occasions. civil magistrates being set up by God for the ends aforesaid, subjection in all lawful things commanded by them ought to be yielded by us in the Lord, not only for wrath, but for conscience' sake. And we ought to make supplications and prayers for kings and all that are in authority, that under them we may live a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. So it's a short paragraph, the Baptists here treating what the Bible has to say with respect to the civil magistrate, the civil government. Compared to the Westminster Confession of Faith and the Savoy Declaration, it is considerably shorter. That's because the Presbyterians that were comprised of some who were parliamentarians, they included in their confession of faith the reality that the civil magistrate should, to a certain degree, be involved with respect to religious matters. The independents, John Owen and his ilk in the Savoy Declaration of Faith, included that but lightened it and softened it a little bit. The Baptists, however, taking what we should believe to be the more biblical and the more purer view with respect to the doctrine of the civil magistrate as the Bible sets it forth, removes anything that has to do with the civil government being involved in religious affairs. And we believe rightly so. It's a shorter paragraph, or a shorter chapter, But we ought to remark that they include a lot of the language that their Westminster and Savoy brethren included, and they're showing their assent to their fellow Presbyterians and Independents in opposition to the Anabaptists of the time. So the Anabaptists, which, you know, the confession, as much as it's targeting Roman Catholicism or writing against Roman Catholicism and Sassinians and that sort of a thing, it's also trying to communicate that particular Baptists are not Anabaptists. And at this point of the doctrine of the civil magistrate, the Anabaptists were were something of anarchists in the sense that they opposed the civil government or they thought the civil government to be wicked, to be evil. Obviously, as we look upon the civil government of any time, we can remark that particular leaders and particular systems and institutions are evil, but civil government in and of itself as being that which has been ordained by God is not in and of itself wicked. And so the Baptists are showing their affinity with the Presbyterians and the Independents, but distancing themselves a little bit because of their approach, their fuller approach to the doctrine of Christian liberty and liberty of conscience, as well as with respect to civil government as a whole. Now, the other thing in view contextually here is the impositions of the Church of England against dissenters, the particular Baptists would be those who would have been dissenters. In other words, those not in agreement with and opposing the Church of England and the governmental imposition into religious matters and the squashing of religious freedom and those sorts of things. So, the Baptists, it's... The stance of the Baptists, though, I think it's commendable, because while they are the recipients of persecution by the hands of the civil magistrate, they nevertheless affirm that Christians are to obey the civil magistrate in all things lawful. You know, you think about, you can think about the nature of man and his perverse reactionism that can obtain in the face of persecution, they might have been tempted to be like the Anabaptists and say the civil magistrate is wicked through and through. God did not ordain it for our good. but they uphold what the Bible says with respect to the civil government, even though the civil government of their time was in opposition to them and threw them in prison sometimes for over a decade. And so I think that's commendable. And just a brief aside, I think that lends itself for us to appreciate that when the writers of the Confession are opposing the Roman Catholics, when they're opposing the Sassanians, when they're opposing Armenians, they're not doing so out of a perverse reactionism. They're doing so by the authority of God, by the authority of the Word of God, and according to proper understanding of the Word of God. And I think their approach to the civil government here is evidence to that particular fact. There is a connection here to chapter 21. Paragraph 2, you don't have to turn there, but that refers to God alone as being the Lord of the conscience. So the doctrine of Christian liberty and liberty of conscience connects to the doctrine of the civil magistrate. God alone is Lord of the conscience, the civil magistrate is not. Also chapter 26 in paragraph 4, the Lord Jesus Christ is the head of the church. The doctrine of conscience and liberty, the doctrine of the church, I think have, not I think, they do have a connection here. God, not the government, is Lord of the conscience, and the Lord Jesus Christ, not the government, is the head of the church, and the particular Baptists are clear on those points. So let's look at the content of these three paragraphs then. We could summarize the three paragraphs or title the three paragraphs in this way. Paragraph one, the divine purpose of the civil magistrate. Paragraph 2, the responsibilities of lawful governments. And then paragraph 3, limited obedience to and commanded prayer for civil government. So first off, divine purpose, the divine purpose of the civil magistrate. The first thing that we notice here is that the civil magistrate is of divine origin. Notice the language here, God the Supreme Lord and King of all the world hath ordained civil magistrates to be under him over the people. So the first thing we learn here is that civil magistrates are ordained by God and we see God's sovereignty over civil government. I like how the confession begins here, not with the civil magistrate is under God, though that would be fine, but it begins with the word God and then elaboration upon our God, the Supreme Lord and King of all the world. When we come to a consideration of the civil magistrate, it's comforting to understand that the civil magistrate is under God, who is the supreme Lord and King of all the world. The nations of this world are the nations of our God and of his Christ. And so whatever the civil government may do, whatever the civil government may bring upon the people and the church, We can be confident, first off, that the Lord God is the ordainer of all things, and also that the Lord God, as the God of justice and holiness, will judge those who oppose his truth and who oppose his will. And so the civil government is under God, and we see this There are some key, it's very interesting. It's one of the, not the only paragraph, but one of the only paragraphs that has sort of one Bible, one scripture proof text. And it's a key proof text in a consideration of the civil magistrate. And that is Romans 13, one to four. And you can turn there as we're talking about the divine origin here of civil government. Romans 13 is sort of the key passage. And this also ties up to the entirety of the chapter, really, but paragraphs one and three maybe more specifically. Notice Romans 13, beginning at verse one through verse four. Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except from God. And the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore, whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God. And those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For he is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is God's minister and avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. So we see there the language, the authority that the civil magistrate has is not inherent to the civil magistrate, the civil government. The civil government is not an authority from themselves. They're not even an authority from man. They don't exist by virtue of the consent of the governed. They exist by virtue of God who has ordained them. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. So we have the divine origin of the civil magistrate. And it's interesting to point out here, as Pastor Butler has pointed out many times, the government at the time of Paul's writing here wasn't a holy, harmless, and undefiled government. You know, we think we have it bad, and we really do. The governments are wicked in our own time. But at this time, it was the Roman government, and it was, you know, it was Nero and his cronies running the show. And they weren't any friends of peace and holiness and justice. And they would increasingly become, of course, no friends of Christians. And so, Paul can still write, though, that we are to submit to those and not to resist to the civil government. Now, we'll get to a qualification when we get to paragraph three, but nevertheless, insofar as things are lawfully given to the governed, we are to submit and not resist to those who govern over us. And Paul can write this in the midst of a godless government who is no friend of Christianity. So God, the Supreme Lord and King of all the world, hath ordained civil magistrates to be under him and over the people. Another passage that we could think about is in Proverbs, Christ speaking as wisdom, and speaking with respect to the fact that by him kings reign. So divine origin, those who are appointed as magistrates over the people are under God, the divine origin of civil government. And we see as well the divine design in civil government. We see here that they are to be for God's own glory and the public good. So there is a purpose given with respect to the civil government. They are to be for God's own glory and the public good. I like the simplicity of the confession here, because if we think about the Canadian government, we have 39 at least, 39 ministries federally, and about 260 sub-ministries within those 39 ministries, doing everything under the sun for the blessed beneficiaries being the Canadian citizens. The government is in everything. and the government wants to be in everything, but here we have the simplicity of God-ordained government. It's simply for His own glory and the public good, and there will be a little bit of a still simplistic elaboration on this in the second paragraph, but we ought to see here what government is actually supposed to do, and I think we see it in Romans 13, specifically where we see in verse verses three and four. Rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same, for he is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain, for he is God's minister and avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. The simplicity of God-ordained government is seen in the punishment of evildoers and and the protection of the judicially innocent, the protection of good and the punishment of evildoers, that is the call upon the government and we see the confession saying that to which end are they given this execution of their role as the civil government. We see the remainder of paragraph one, to this end, God has armed them with the power of the sword Here we are again with the government's role for defense and encouragement of them that do good and for the punishment of evildoers. And if we look then upon the governments in our own day, if we look upon the government of Canada, for example, And to some degree, a good number of states in the United States, they have completely abandoned their chief task as the civil government, which is the wielding of the sword for the punishment of evildoers. And it's an intriguing thing that, and these things aren't contrary to one another, but a nation given over to the rejection of the sanctity of life not only kills babies, but doesn't kill those who ought to receive the death penalty. That's not hypocritical, it's consistent with the rejection of the sanctity of life, and it's consistent with the rejection of God's design for what civil governments are to do. And that is, the defense encouragement of them that do good, and for the punishment of evildoers. One of the very things that the government has been given by God to do, that is to wield the sword, they have completely abandoned. And that's something that we ought to pray for as we get to paragraph three, where we're to pray for kings and those who are in authority, we ought to pray that they would properly wield the sword that God has given them under His ordaining sovereignty, that they would so wield it, that they would even just wield it, not just wield it properly, but wield it. And, you know, the complete abandonment of that is no doubt a sign of judgment upon the nations. But we see in paragraph one, we see God's sovereignty over civil government. Keech writes, Benjamin Keech, kings and rulers are but God's vice regents set in place by his sovereign hand. They rise and fall at his command, for the Lord of hosts is the true governor of all nations, and none can withstand his will. We also see the divine design in civil government in paragraph one. Cox writes, the magistrate's power is ordained of God for the orderly governance of society and the suppression of vice, as well as the advancement of public tranquility. advancement of public tranquility would need to be asterisked and qualified, but there is a measure of simplicity there. Obviously, we don't necessarily want the government to be about the advancement of our tranquility in a particular way, but I think what he's getting at is simply that the government, as Jim often says, would leave us alone and that we could live in peace and tranquility without the imposition of the government in everywhere, in the kitchen, in the closet, in the bedroom, on the streets, and everywhere else. Paragraph two, we see the responsibilities of lawful governments. the responsibilities of lawful governments, and the first thing we see here is the propriety of the believer's participation in civil government. Notice the language here, it is lawful for Christians to accept and execute the office of a magistrate when called thereunto. This is targeted against those contemporaneous to the writers of the Confession, at the time of the Confession, but certainly before and after. For example, the Anabaptists, and I think perhaps even some Mennonites, though you can correct me if I'm wrong, take this particular tact because of their pacifistic views that Christians are not to serve in roles in the civil government. rejects that, we'll see a text here in a moment, but confession in concert with the Bible and properly summarizing it says again that it is lawful for Christians to accept and execute the office of a magistrate when called thereunto. You can turn with me to the New Testament to the Gospel of Luke. This is actually John the Baptist speaking with these whom he has baptized. And in Luke 3, we see John the Baptist preaching. And the people are asking him particular questions, and we see if we pick up at verse 10 of Luke 3, so the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then? He answered and said to them, He who has two tunics, let him give to him who has none, and he who has food, let him do likewise. Notice now here, verse 12, Then tax collectors also came to be baptized, and said to him, Teacher, what shall we do? And he said to them, collect no more than what is appointed for you. Likewise, the soldiers asked him, saying, and what shall we do? So he said to them, do not intimidate anyone or accuse falsely, and be content with your wages. So we see here that the advice of John the Baptist to these two Christians here, a tax collector and a soldier, is not first to the tax collector, abandon your post, that's a wicked trade, take up something else, or abandon yourself to the wilderness, become a monk, take a vow of silence, and whatever else. He simply says in the, it's of course obvious here that he is retaining his position as a tax collector, John the Baptist not opposing that, and he just says, John the Baptist, collect no more than what is appointed for you. In other words, it is lawful to be a tax collector, but it's not lawful to be a tax collector and take what is not due for tax collection. It's sinful, of course, to take more than what is required, whether for the government or, you know, skimming some for yourself, as we see in the biblical record in the gospel accounts, but just collect no more than what is appointed for you. And with regards to approaches to pacifism, John the Baptist is certainly not a pacifist, nor should it be the case that any body calling themselves Christians should take up that view as that which is supposedly biblical. Notice, with regards to the soldier, likewise the soldier asked him, verse 14, what shall we do? The advice is, do not intimidate anyone or accuse falsely. and be content with your wages. Be a good employee. It's lawful for you to be enrolled as a soldier in the military, but do it under God and do it lawfully. No intimidation, no false accusation, and no complaint about your wages. So we see the confession here upholding Opposing the notion that Christians can't serve in the civil magistrate and upholding that they most certainly can. It is lawful for Christians to accept and execute such a particular role. Secondly, we see here the tasks expected of the civil government. Notice as the language continues here, in the management whereof, as they ought especially to maintain justice and peace, according to the wholesome laws of each kingdom and commonwealth, So for that end, they may lawfully now, under the New Testament, wage war upon just and necessary occasions. Now, we won't spend a whole lot of time on just war and what constitutes it, but notice that the confession, in concert with the Bible that it is summarizing, does not reject war, does not reject violence as a means which is often employed by God to achieve peace. There is lawful war. War can be waged upon just and necessary occasions. But more to the point of the civil government with respect to the tasks expected of them, they ought especially to maintain justice and peace. This perpetuates, in a good way, the simplicity of what the government is called for. The government is not called to be anything and everything to everybody. It is simply about justice and peace, about the punishment of evildoers and the protection of those who do good. And I think we ought to navigate, I won't say a middle road, but some balanced road, whatever the middle might be. We're not anarchists. in that we believe because the Bible tells us that God has ordained the civil magistrate to be under him and over the people. At the same time, of course, we should not want to see a big government, certainly not a totalitarianism. I mean, the more that we look upon our landscape today, the more it looks totalitarian. It, you know, it flies under the guise of democracy and it flies under the, you know, it's not a full-out totalitarianism, but what, you know, in a totalitarianism, what do we have? We have state-controlled propaganda. We have, you know, state-controlled media. We have the exaltation of personality over policy. We have the imposition of an idealistic unity that everybody must conform to a perceived good. We have the squashing of dissenting voices. We see that in our own time. So while we're not anarchists, we're certainly not, on the flip side of that, those who want some sort of a some sort of a large government that God, yes, has ordained civil government, so let's have them just take care of us and do everything for us. No, we ought to have the biblically informed and balanced position of a small government that does what they're supposed to do and doesn't do everything else. setting aside what they're supposed to do. I think that's what we see in our government today. Not only are they doing everything that they shouldn't do, but they're not doing what they should do. And that's why we ought to be called to pray for kings and those who are in authority as they rule over us, and that they would do it for our good and for the peace of the nation. Okay, so paragraph three then, we're moving along fairly quickly here. Paragraph three speaks to limited obedience. to and commanded prayer for civil government. Notice the language here. When we say limited obedience, what we're saying is that we're not commanded. It's not the case that citizens are to be in a total and unmitigated obedience to the civil magistrate doing whatever they tell us to do. When Paul writes in Romans 13, and when Peter writes in 1 Peter, that we're to be subject to the governing authorities, that we're to fear God and honor the king, they're not saying that we're to be submissive in all things, but as the Confession says here, paragraph three, civil magistrates being set up by God for the ends aforesaid, subjection in all lawful things, commanded by them ought to be yielded by us in the Lord." So, first off, the expected yet qualified obedience to civil government. Just a few quotes by particular Baptists at this particular time. And I think most of these come prior to the act of toleration in 1688, 1689, when particular Baptists could finally become public and publish the confession of faith. Before, it was really in secret. That's why we call it the 1677 slash 1689 is it was written in secret, in essence, in 1677, but really could only be published in 1689 when the Act of Toleration was passed and they were able to openly worship, still with restriction, but with much less restriction. So this is on expected yet qualified obedience to the civil government. This is Spilsbury. Obedience to magistrates in lawful commands is a duty upon Christians so long as it doth not contradict the law of Christ. This is Andrew Ritter. The good and lawful commands of kings and rulers are to be followed so far as they comply with the higher law of God. And then Christopher Blackwood. A magistrate's authority extends to the punishment of wrongdoers, but he must not lay his hand against the true worship of God. And that is one of the biggest things that was taking place against the Particular Baptists in the 17th century, that the civil government was laying their hands against the true worship of God. They were opposing the Particular Baptists, preventing them from worshiping, demanding obedience to the Church of England in worship and in doctrine, And one of the biggest points of opposition was credo baptism, but it wasn't the only point of opposition. So again, a magistrate's authority extends to the punishment of wrongdoers, but he must not lay his hand against the true worship of God. You can turn with me to the book of Acts to see this, Acts chapter five. And it's not only confined to Acts chapter five. I mean, we see the example throughout the book of Acts. where the disciples are preaching, the apostles are preaching Christ and coming up against opposition by the civil governments, by the religious authorities, we could say, in Judaism, but obviously, or with respect to the Jews, but obviously there's an intermingling of civil order, in a sense, with religious order, though it was the Roman Empire that was the imperial force at the time. And then, of course, even with the Roman Empire, we see the increasing persecution in the Book of Acts in opposition to the proclamation of Christ. But in Acts 5, notice if we pick up at verse 22, we see this, the apostles being tried for their preaching of the Lord Jesus Christ. But when the, this is 522, but when the officers came and did not find them in the prison, they returned and reported saying, indeed, we found the prison shut securely and the guards standing outside before the doors. But when we opened them, we found no one inside. Now when the high priest, the captain of the temple and the chief priest heard these things, they wondered, what the outcome would be. So one came and told them, saying, Look, the men whom you put in prison are standing in the temple and teaching the people. Then the captain went with the officers and brought them without violence, for they feared the people, lest they should be stoned. And when they had brought them, they set them before the council, and the high priest asked them, saying, Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine and intend to bring this man's blood on us. But Peter and the other apostles answered and said, we ought to obey God rather than men. This is really where, you know, the proverbial rubber hits the proverbial road with respect to the limited obedience to civil government. When the civil government commands something in opposition to the law of God and the command of King Jesus, those so commanded are not obliged to obey. Because it is not a lawful thing or a lawful command, but an unlawful command. And we see this language here, verse 28, did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? So that is clearly an unlawful command. And the righteous and right response not only from these apostles here, but from Christians throughout any age, is we ought to obey God rather than men. Whenever the civil government commands something unlawful, whether it pertains to doctrine or whether it pertains to worship, such as the freedom to so gather in worship, we are to obey God rather than men. Civil magistrates being set up by God for the ends of foresaid, and that's before we even get to in all lawful things that asterisk or qualification, the language of for the ends of foresaid already introduces that qualification. But we have this subjection in all lawful things commanded by them ought to be yielded by us in the Lord. And then there's this clause, not only for wrath, but for conscience's sake. For conscience's sake. That means that obedience to the civil magistrate is not only to be for the avoidance of wrath, but also simply and generally that we would as Christians have a good conscience before God and men. We're not simply to obey in all lawful things in order to avoid wrath, but because it's the right thing to do, and Christians having a good conscience before God are to so act. We also have the call to pray for civil government. Notice the language here in the middle of paragraph three. not only for wrath, but for conscience sake, and we ought to make supplications and prayers for kings and all that are in authority. Coming from 1 Timothy 2, and what's going on, well, you can just turn there for a moment. The language is essentially identical there, but let's just have a look at 1 Timothy 2 for a moment. In my management of time, for those who have been here for a long time, I usually go extremely over. But now I've gone to the completely other side of the pendulum, and now I can't manage time on the other side of things. But anyway, here we are. 1 Timothy chapter 2. Notice the beginning. of chapter two, verses one and two. Therefore, I exhort, first of all, that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, for kings, and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. The confession is almost verbatim there. It contains almost the entirety of that language. And contextually, it's a, if we know what's going on in the Roman Empire at that time, the Roman Empire, again, it's no friend of Christians at this time, it would have been right around the time, or just after, maybe by a couple years, when Nero turned direction and started to be a lot more actively opposed, that the imperial opposition in the Roman Empire to Christians was heated at this time, and it was only growing more heated, and it would reach sort of a fever pitch in AD 64 with the fire that Nero blamed Christians for. But at this time in the Pax Romana, you know, where it was, you know, I think historically the Pax Romana was supposed to be this, you know, empire-wide maintaining of peace on the part of the Roman Empire. But what it really was, was totalitarian forced peace by the Roman Empire. Squashing of dissenting voices, ensuring imperial religion was maintained, all of those sorts of things. It was a strong imperial weight being brought upon the citizens of the Roman Empire. And so, that's no doubt, in one sense, fueling Paul's exhortation. I exhort, first of all, that prayers, supplications, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, for kings, and all who are in authority. Yeah? This was probably, what, 60 to 62-ish? 62, 63, yeah. So it would have been, yeah, in that case, just a year or two before the great fire there, which was, I believe, AD 64. All of that to come back to the fact that there's a context driving this, but there's a general principle, of course, in view as well. We ought to pray for those who rule over us. I think we have almost a threefold direction in prayer if we can say that. We want to pray for salvation. We want to pray that God would bring the light of his understanding and the light of Christ to the hearts of all men and those who are in authority as well. What a blessed thing it would be to have someone made alive by the power of God in a place of influence. within the rank and file of the government. We ought to pray for restraint. If it's not God's will that he would save those kings and those who are in authority, then we ought to pray for restraint upon a government that is unbelieving and that is wicked. Perhaps that they would, even in their unbelief, nevertheless, by the light of nature, see the justice, and perhaps even a knowledge of the scriptures, see what is proper justice, proper wrath, and those sorts of things, and so exercise government. And we ought to also be able to, and we can, pray imprecatorily. We can pray malediction upon those who in reprobate opposition would continue to, by wickedness, by horrible legislation, and by clear opposition, reject God and oppose his people. The idea here or the force here by the Apostle Paul is unto the particular end that Christians may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. It's a wonderful thing when there is no tumultuous you know, tumultuous landscape with respect to the civil government and its rule, such that Christians can freely preach the gospel to sinners. If they're always having to deal with an opposing government, if they're always having to do with citizenry that's inflamed by an opposing government, then it's very difficult to freely and openly and consistently preach the gospel. Not that they can't when a tumult comes, because we see in the book of Acts that when hot persecution came upon the church, the disciples went everywhere preaching the word and the gospel. Gospel seeds were sown beyond the borders of Jerusalem. But we ought to pray, not but, we should be in prayer for those who rule over us, for those aforehand mentioned things that they would properly rule, but also on the part of Christians, that we would live a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. This is Collins on that last particular point. William Collins, magistracy, there's a new word for you, is a common blessing of God, government, is a common blessing of God without which no society can subsist in peace and order. So we don't want chaos and disorder, we want peace and order, but we want that with a government that is restrained from wickedness and is upholding the proper exercise of the sword, the punishment of evildoers, and the protection of those who do good. Just a word from Spurgeon here in closing with regards to the civil government and the Christians' responsibility to them. We have seen, practically speaking, in the last number of years, some of the things that we're reading about here with respect to the government, some of the Really putting Acts chapter 5 into action, we obey God rather than men. The government has no role in telling the church what the church is to do, whether that pertains to doctrine or worship. And so we have this very interesting balance as Christians, a biblical balance between what church is, what state is, and what proper doctrine and worship should look like with respect to the goings forth of the church. And I guess what I'm getting at is the fact that recognizing that God is over the government, having ordained it for our good, the government is over the people, but only insofar as their laws are lawful. At the point by which their laws, they command things that are unlawful, we are to obey God rather than men. And our obedience, we should say this as well, our obedience to the civil government is not because of the civil government. Our obedience to the civil magistrate is, the foundation for our obedience to them is not found in the government or in the civil magistrate, it's found in God. We obey the civil magistrate in things lawful, not because of the civil magistrate, but because of the God that is over them, the God that has ordained them for our good and for the punishment of evildoers. And I think that's something that hopefully can help us as we, in the face of a wicked government, seek to honor God in subjection to the government and things lawful. If we understand that we're not doing it because of the men and women who rule over us, If we understand that we're not doing it because they're the civil government, but we understand that we're in submission to the government, again, in this limited and qualified way, because God has ordained them and we're honoring God and obeying Him, and so obeying the civil government, I think that will help us as we slog about in this lower world in the context of a government that is increasingly in opposition to Christ's people. This is Spurgeon. And we'll close with this and we'll have some, if there are any questions, we can answer those and deal with those. Any questions or comments? But this is Spurgeon to bring us to a close. I believe that kings, princes, and magistrates are to be obeyed and reverenced within their proper sphere. But when they usurp the place of God and set themselves in opposition to Christ and his gospel, then we must resist and never yield. We cannot give to Caesar that which belongs to God alone, for it is written, render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. Let the magistrate keep to his place, and let the Christian also keep to his. Obedience to magistrates is a Christian duty, but it must never be pressed beyond the bounds of conscience. There are certain rights which belong to God alone, and we are bound as Christian men never to yield these rights, even should our noncompliance be rewarded with a martyr's crown. So praise God for the particular Baptists and their approach to civil government. I think bringing a corrective to their reformed compatriots of the time, rightly reflecting what the Bible says with respect to the bounds of Christian freedom, the bounds of the liberty of conscience, and the proper bounds of the government where they are not to go beyond, and the fact that it is our blessed God who is Lord over all the nations. Praise God for the comfort that we have in a sovereign king, in a sovereign God who rules the nations. Let's pray. Heavenly Father, we thank you for your word. We thank you for what you have disclosed to us with regards to your sovereign rule over all things. We thank you that you have ordained over us those particular bodies that are to uphold justice. We pray that they would do so. As we often pray, we pray that you would cause governments who rule over the people to do so properly, to do so in proper order and in proper righteousness. It grieves us to see such wickedness, such intrusion upon the liberties of people in many nations, including our own. We pray that you would bring restraint, that you would bring salvation, and that for any who remain in a reprobate, wicked opposition, to the people generally and to the church specifically, we pray that you would cast them down, that you would raise up those who would rule in righteousness and proper justice. We pray that you'd go with us in worship, help us to honor you, our glorious God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, to rejoice in our Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, and to rejoice in amazing grace. And we pray in Christ's name, amen.
