← Back to sermon library

The Empty Tomb and the Risen Lord

Jim Butler · 2021-04-04 · Matthew 28:1–10 · 8,349 words · 52 min

With reference to the discovery 
of the empty tomb, we've got three sub points. Notice in the 
first place, the arrival at the tomb. The time is indicated. 
Now, after the Sabbath, as the first day of the week began to 
dawn. Now, we're going to continue 
in our study on the Christian Sabbath, God willing, next week. 
And one of the reasons, one of the elements in terms of rationale 
for the church meeting on the first day is the resurrection 
of our Lord Jesus. It takes place on the first day 
of the week. Now, Hebrews 4 will illustrate 
the difference between Saturday Sabbath-keeping and Sunday Sabbath-keeping, 
and eventually we'll arrive there. But notice now, it's the first 
day of the week, and our blessed Savior has arisen from the dead. One commentator says, the literal 
dawning of a new day signals a new period of history. Our 
blessed Christ lived, He died, but he was raised again the third 
day. The death had no dominion over 
him, as Paul tells us in Romans chapter 6. And then the purpose 
for which the ladies come is to anoint the body of our Lord 
Jesus. You see that in Mark 16 and then as well in Luke 23. 
Now notice the two ladies that are mentioned. It says, after 
the Sabbath, as the first day of the week began to dawn, Mary 
Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb. These two 
Marys are identified at the crucifixion according to chapter 27 and verse 
56, and then they're mentioned with reference to the burial 
in chapter 27 and verse 61, and here they are at the empty tomb. 
Salome is also present here at the empty tomb according to Mark 
16. Now, notice how God is dignifying women. It was the male disciples 
that deserted the Lord Jesus. Now, I'm not stepping off from 
this point to say women should be pastors, women should be the 
officers in the church. Paul makes all that very clear 
in 1 Timothy 3. But it does underscore that in 
terms of God, women aren't second-class citizens. And any man who treats 
women that way is not imitating his Lord. Men were to love our 
wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her. We're 
not supposed to be despots and tyrants and those kinds of persons 
that rule with a heavy hand. The Lord God Most High, under 
the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, has dignified women's presence 
at the death, the burial, and the resurrection of our Lord 
Jesus Christ. Now notice the descent of the 
angel in verses 2 to 4. There is an earthquake that happens. 
Interestingly, the death of Christ is attended by an earthquake, 
as is the resurrection of Christ. In chapter 27, at verses 51 and 
54, you see that there is an earthquake at the time of His 
death, and here there's an earthquake at the time of His resurrection. 
Behold, verse 2 tells us there was a great earthquake. John 
Gill says, and it was a symbol and a token of the presence and 
majesty of Christ, at whose rising, as at his death, the earth shook 
and trembled. C. H. Spurgeon made the observation, 
when the king awoke from the sleep of death, he shook the 
world. The bedchamber in which he rested 
for a little while trembled as the heavenly hero arose from 
his couch. It's a blessed way to describe 
it and to underscore the pomp and the majesty associated with 
this. God the Lord raised His Son from 
the dead. Of course the earth is going 
to quake. Of course the creation is going 
to take notice. Of course the world should bow 
in reverence and awe at the majesty of God Most High in orchestrating 
all of this for the salvation of His people whom He chose in 
Christ before the foundation of the world. Great events are 
attended by great circumstances and the greatest event is the 
death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. So we have 
the earthquake, and now we have the descent of this angel. Notice 
in verse 2, "...Behold, there was a great earthquake, for an 
angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled back 
the stone from the door and sat on it." So the explanatory 4 
indicates the supernatural character of the earthquake. This wasn't 
just a seismic shift. This wasn't just something that 
happened in Israel at that particular time. No, it's associated with 
a supernatural event, vis-à-vis the resurrection of our Lord. 
This wasn't the normal kind of earthquake that affects California. This wasn't the normal kind of 
earthquake that affects persons from time to time, but it was 
supernatural in nature, just like the one that attended the 
death of our blessed Savior. So this angel is described for 
us in verse 2. An angel of the Lord descended 
from heaven, came and rolled back the stone from the door, 
and sat on it. His countenance was like lightning, 
and his clothing as white as snow. Now the young man in Mark 
16.5 is no doubt this angel, and then the two men in shining 
garments in Luke 24, four are angels. Now, just a little word 
for those who say, the Bible is filled with contradictions. 
Typically, those are dumb people. They're ignorant people. They're 
moronic people. Let me just give you a little 
lesson in logic. If Luke had two angels, there 
was certainly one at the place what Matthew writes about. A 
contradiction is to say there's two, and it was not the case 
that there was two. To have two necessarily includes 
one, and that is not contradictory. Most likely, Matthew only identifies 
the angel that spoke. So no antinomy, no disparity, 
no paradox, no contradiction. But typically, as Gordon Clark 
wisely pointed out, usually the problem occurs between our ears. It's not in the text of Scripture. There is no contradiction in 
the resurrection narratives. And then notice the presence 
of an angel found at the incarnation. Chapter 1, verse 20. Chapter 
1, verse 24. Chapter 2, verses 13 and 19. 
So the incarnation of our Lord is heralded by the angels. as 
well as the resurrection of our Lord, it is heralded by the angels. That anthem, as it were, has 
become something co-opted by the church on earth. It is a 
great confession of faith to exclaim with the angels and with 
the hosts of heaven, He is risen. That's probably the reason most 
of us get out of bed on any given day, is because He rose from 
the dead. He has secured our life eternal. 
He has blessed us with every spiritual blessing, and He has 
encouraged us immensely by His grace and for His glory. And 
then as far as the description is, well, back to the removal 
of the stone. Look at this for a moment. It 
says, He rolled back the stone from the door and sat on it. 
The passage technically does not narrate the resurrection 
of our Lord Jesus. It rather narrates the empty 
tomb. Christ had already been raised. Christ had already been gone. The angel rolls back the stone, 
not so Jesus can get out, as if Jesus needed help from an 
angel, but it's so that the women and the disciples could investigate. This is another blessed thing 
in scripture. The scientific method is employed 
by the angel. He doesn't say, trust me, he's 
risen from the dead. Just take my word for it. No, 
come on and see. In John's gospel in chapter 20, 
the narration of the resurrection account there, we have Peter 
and John running to the tomb. And when they get to the tomb, 
they see the grave clothes folded up and laid in a pile. Why is 
that detail necessary? To indicate that this wasn't 
the work of grave robbers. I've never robbed a grave. I've 
done a lot of things I'm not proud of, but I've never robbed 
a grave. If I had, though, one thing that 
I don't think I would ever do is clean up after. I wouldn't 
fold what remaining clothes were there and lay them in a pile. 
All of the details narrated by these evangelists are given there 
to underscore the historicity of it. In the early part of the 
20th century, you had the rise of theological liberalism. Unfortunately, 
that's almost orthodoxy today, but theological liberalism denied 
the supernatural. They denied what? Atonement. 
They denied resurrection. They were, in many respects, 
like the Sadducees that we find in the first century that were 
sort of combatants with our Lord Jesus. And for them, it wasn't 
that the facts needed to be there. History didn't really count or 
really didn't matter. What really is the impact is 
the feelings or the way it affects us. So it's the existential connection. It's not really the history that's 
involved. That's why Machen says there's history and there's doctrine. And the church cannot jettison 
the history and somehow survive with the doctrine. That didn't 
work with theological liberalism. It is bad. It is obviously bad 
when you deny the historicity of resurrection, of blood atonement, 
of anything that the Bible tells us is history. So the angel doesn't 
roll back the stone to let Jesus out, but to let the women investigate. And then notice that the angel 
is sitting on the stone. That's an indicator of triumph. Matthew Henry made this observation. He said, there he sat, defying 
all the powers of hell to roll the stone to the grave again. 
So the angel's sitting on that stone. It ain't going back. The 
Savior's not going back. This is triumph pronounced or 
preached by the angel in terms of his action. And so the angel 
is then described as his countenance was like lightning and his clothing 
as white as snow. You see that manifestation on 
the Mount of Transfiguration when Jesus is transfigured before 
their eyes and he's shining brightly and glorious. As well, it goes 
back into the prophet Daniel, where personages, or angels rather, 
that appeared to Daniel took on these like characteristics. 
So the scene is supernatural, but the scene nevertheless is 
historical. It occurred, it took place, and 
we understand it that way. And then notice, with reference 
to the descent of the angel, the effect it had upon the guards. 
Verse 4. And the guards shook, they literally, 
quaked, just like the earth had quaked, now the guards are quaking. The guards shook for fear of 
him and became like dead men. The angel didn't scream at them, 
the angel didn't terrify them, the angel didn't appear to them 
in some monstrous form that would have produced in them this fear 
or trembling. No! He just descended, he rolls 
back the stone, and he sits upon the stone, and yet these soldiers 
are quaking. This account, or verse 4, demonstrates 
the lie of verse 13. Notice in Matthew chapter 28 
at verse 11. Now while they were going, behold, 
some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief 
priests all the things that had happened. When they had assembled 
with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum 
of money to the soldiers, saying, Tell them his disciples came 
at night and stole him away while we slept." How would they know 
that if they were sleeping? Everything about this is ludicrous. And if you read this section 
11 to 15, it is the contrast to the Great Commission of verses 
16 to 20. Christ commissions His church 
to go out and preach the truth, to make disciples, to baptize 
them. On the other hand, the opponents 
of Christ lie. They engage in deception. They 
engage in ludicrous explanations to try and cover up. This is 
the backwards Great Commission on the part of the God-haters. 
Verse 14, and if this comes to the governor's ears, we will 
appease him and make you secure, which further underscores the 
nature of Pontius Pilate. I mean, if he's that malleable, 
if he is that formable, if he is that easy to manipulate, he's 
even worse than we ever imagined. And then verse 15, they took 
the money and did as they were instructed, and this saying is 
commonly reported among the Jews until this day. Now notice, back 
to verse 4, the guards shook for fear of him and became like 
dead men. The irony is obvious. The men 
charged with guarding a dead man are now like dead men. They quake, and they fear, and 
they shudder, subsequent to the resurrection of the one they 
were guarding. John Calvin says, the soldiers 
who were accustomed to tumults were terrified and were so completely 
overwhelmed by alarm that they fell down like men who were almost 
dead, but no power was exerted to raise them from that condition. The power of God is manifested 
in the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. These men are cowering. 
There's no equal power to raise them to a position of not fearing. So we have this magnificent event, 
the empty tomb discovered by these women. And now notice that 
the angel gives instruction to the women. In the first place, 
note the word of encouragement in verse five. The angel answered 
and said to the women, do not be afraid. Why do you think he 
says that? Because it's not normal to go 
and attend to the body of somebody that you love and find them to 
be absent. It's not a normal occurrence. 
That's why we call these miracles. That's why we call this supernatural. And so in the thought of that, 
or with the realization of that, the angel calms them. Do not 
be afraid. They, like the soldiers, were 
terrified at the scene. Spurgeon again says, let the 
soldiers tremble, let them lie as if dead through fright, but 
fear not ye, for I know that you seek Jesus which was crucified. And then he says, those who seek 
Jesus need not fear. What a blessed reminder from 
our brother Spurgeon. What a blessed reminder from 
the angel attending the resurrection of our Lord. In other words, 
when you serve a Lord that was crucified and has been raised 
from the dead, as a general rule, you don't have to fear anymore. 
As a general rule, God's got this. As a general rule, everything's 
going to be okay. Because if God did not spare, 
but delivered up His own Son for us, how will He not with 
Him freely give us all things? Paul makes that statement in 
Romans chapter 8. We are not to be a fearful people. We are not to be paralyzed. We're 
not to undergo that withdrawal from anything that we fear or 
that we think may affect us. That doesn't mean that we're 
fools. It doesn't mean that we're morons. It doesn't mean that 
we jump off roofs and think that God's going to spare us or save 
us or keep us or do those sorts of things. But at the same time, 
Christians who are in fear, not of God, but from circumstances, 
Now, I'm saying Christians, this is one of those instances where 
I should be in the front row sort of preaching to myself, 
as one has said, you got one pointed out, you got three pointed 
back, right? The tendency to fear is real, 
and that's why from Genesis to Revelation, God emphasizes over 
and over and over again that his people do not need to fear. Fear him who has the power to 
kill body and soul and hell, but don't fear man. Now, man 
can do some pretty horrific things. Man can inflict a lot of suffering, 
a lot of hardship, a lot of pain. Man can engage in dastardly deeds, 
but ultimately, the body gives up. Ultimately, you do exit and 
you do go to be in the presence of God Almighty. So the first 
word to these ladies as they find the empty tomb is do not 
fear. And then the angel explains, 
for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. He knows their 
presence is there for a particular reason. In Luke 24, the angel 
asks, why do you seek the living among the dead? Now notice as 
well that the angel confirms that Jesus died. See, Muslim 
theology, or Islamic theology, is a form of the swoon theory. 
The swoon theory was posited by theological liberals, suggesting 
that Jesus really didn't die on the cross. I mean, certainly 
it took a toll on his body, certainly he went into the tomb, but he 
rejuvenated, he was refreshed, and ultimately he exited from 
that tomb. of his own accord, but the angel 
underscores the crucifixion. Notice in verse six, he is not, 
I'm sorry, verse five, do not be afraid for I know that you 
seek Jesus who was crucified. That actually happened. Again, 
this idea, brethren, that historical facts aren't that important when 
it comes to Bible study is an absolute atrocity. If the Bible's 
history is wrong, then likely the Bible's theology is wrong. If there was no first Adam, we 
have no assurance that there was a last Adam. If there was 
no blood atonement, if there was no resurrection, if there 
was no ascension, if there was no current session, if there 
is no coming again in glory to judge the living and the dead, 
then as Paul says, we're miserable. We are pitiable. If we don't 
have resurrection hope founded on an empty tomb and a glorified 
Savior, then we are men that are above all miserable in this 
life and in the life to come. The angel then announces the 
resurrection with that blessed anthem taken up by the church. 
Verse 6, he is not here for he is risen. Now again, this wasn't 
the first. Christ himself raised people 
from the dead. But in terms of the theology 
of resurrection, it's all connected to him. We see that in Paul's 
defenses before the Sanhedrin and his defenses before the Roman 
government. It is because of the resurrection 
of the dead that Paul finds himself on trial. But as we move through 
the narrative, that resurrection from the dead is connected to 
our Lord Jesus Christ. If there is no Lord Jesus Christ, 
if there was no life, death, and resurrection of Him, then 
there wouldn't be for us as well. There'd be nothing more on our 
horizon than simply a dreamless sleep. And then the angel reminds 
them of Jesus' oft-repeated assertions. Look at what He says, He is not 
here, verse 6, for He is risen as He said. See, I think at times 
we just run through passages like that, or we run through 
fulfillment of Scripture passages. But brethren, this underscores 
the beauty of the Bible. It underscores the unity, the 
consent of the parts. It underscores the scope of Scripture, 
which is the glory of God and the salvation of sinners by Jesus 
Christ, our Lord. On several occasions, Jesus spoke 
not only of his death, but of his resurrection. He told his 
disciples what was going to happen. Now, obviously, that would have 
been a difficulty. In fact, look at 28, 16. Then 
the 11 disciples went away into Galilee to the mountain which 
Jesus had appointed for them. When they saw him, they worshipped 
him, but some doubted. Why do you think they doubted? 
Because it's hard to believe that a man that was crucified 
in such a horrific way would be raised again from the dead. 
And as well, look at what this says concerning divine inspiration 
of Scripture. Brethren, if I was writing the 
Bible to try to formulate a response on the part of people, I wouldn't 
indicate there were doubters. I'd say everybody was right there 
on board. They were all amazed at the glory 
of Jesus Christ. It's that kind of stuff. It is 
those kinds of details that indicate to us the veracity of Scripture. If men sat in a room and took 
pains to put together an account of the resurrection, there wouldn't 
be the differences that you see in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. 
Now, listen to what I'm saying. Not contradictions, not paradoxes, 
not an antinomy, but rather differences. Differences that can be harmonized, 
which underscore the reality that they didn't get together 
and engage in some sort of act of deception and take pains to 
hunt-wink people that would fall prey to their methodology. And 
with reference to the resurrection in this instance, look at what 
it says in verses 6 and 7. Verse 6, He is not here for He 
is risen. And then again in verse 7, And 
go quickly and tell His disciples that He is risen from the dead. 
Both of these are passive verbs. That means that the Father raised 
Him from the dead. Now, there are obvious implications 
to this with reference to the Trinity I don't want to get into, 
but I want to quote Francis Turretin, who indicates the reality behind 
this. But there is a peculiar reason why it, the resurrection, 
is ascribed to the Father. Now, it's ascribed to Jesus in 
other instances, but here it's ascribed to the Father. He says, 
"...on account of the obligation which Christ took upon Himself, 
from which He ought to be released by the Father as Judge, who, 
as He had delivered up Christ to death for our sins, so He 
ought to raise Him up again for our justification, in order to 
testify that a full satisfaction had been made by Him." So the 
Father raises the Son from the dead as a full testimony that 
a full satisfaction had been made by Him. And before we move 
on, again, I want to direct your attention to that scientific 
methodology. Come see the place where the 
Lord lay. The end of verse 6. The truth 
has nothing to fear. Have you ever had a visit from 
Jehovah's Witnesses? What do they do? They want to 
hand you stuff, don't they? I mean, they want to bug you 
and talk to you. you know, go on about, I wouldn't be bugging 
if they had good theology. Sure, I'd like to talk theology, 
it's always fun. But they're always denying the deity of Jesus 
and they're always denying the doctrine of hell. Walter Martin, 
the original Bible Answer Man said, his idea was they talk 
about, they deny the deity of Jesus and they deny the existence 
of hell. And he said, knowing full well 
that if Jesus is God, they are going to go to hell. And I always 
thought that was an interesting perspective. But have you ever 
tried to give them something? It's kind of like trying to hand 
them a 100-pound Rottweiler that wants to eat them. Nope, they 
can't take it. Why not? If your truth cannot 
stand to examination or investigation, you need to recheck your truth. 
If the scientific methodology cannot be applied to the empty 
tomb, then brethren, we've been hoodwinked. But that's not what 
happens. The angel says, come and see, 
look at where he lay. Peter and John go into that tomb. 
They survey the inner sanctum, as it were. They see the grave 
clothes. This idea that to ask questions 
is misinformation, to ask questions is somehow anti-science, is anti-science 
itself. Science is about investigation, 
it's about comparison, it's about hypothesis, it's about testing, 
it's about verifying, it's about proceeding from that vantage 
point. The angel doesn't say, just take my word for it, you 
don't need to go see. No, come and see where he lay. 
See what God Most High did with reference to his beloved son. 
So there is this word of encouragement in verses 5 to 6, and now this 
word of instruction in verse 7. He goes on to say, go quickly 
and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead. And indeed, 
he is going before you into Galilee. There you will see him. Behold, 
I have told you. So the women become the apostles 
to the apostles. Please listen to what I'm saying. 
I'm not suggesting they were actually officially apostles, 
but they're becoming sent ones, which apostle means by the angel 
to the apostles. to instruct them that Christ 
had risen from the dead. The women are to tell the apostles 
to go to Galilee in order to see Jesus. Go back to Matthew 
26 and verse 32. This confirms what Christ had 
said prior to his death. But after I have been raised, 
I will go before you to Galilee. And the angel underscores his 
message with authority. At the end of verse seven, he 
says, behold, I have told you. Now why Galilee? Why does the 
Great Commission obtain in Galilee? Well, remember, Galilee was Galilee 
of the Gentiles, according to Matthew chapter 4. The nature 
of the Great Commission is not just to Jews, but it includes 
Gentiles. It is the most fitting and appropriate 
place to launch the new covenant mission, to send forth the church, 
to send forth the apostles, to preach the gospel, to make known 
Jesus, to make disciples and then to baptize those disciples 
and to teach them in local churches. France says, but now the corollary 
of his going ahead is spelled out. When they get to Galilee, 
they will see him, not just an empty tomb, but a living Jesus. 
So Galilee is where the ministry begins and Galilee is where the 
ministry continues in Matthew 28 in terms of Christ's instruction 
or commission to his church to go out and multiply disciples 
and to make new churches or to found new churches. And then 
notice what the women do in verse 8. So they went out quickly from 
the tomb with fear and great joy and ran to bring his disciples 
word. They obeyed. They didn't say, 
well, no, they just did what they were told, right? See, brethren, 
that's the response of the people of God to the Word of God. It's 
not a million questions. It's not the but-whys that you 
get from your two-year-old. It's the, yes, Lord, I'll do 
what you command me to do. Now, he's not Lord in the sense 
that they would worship him, but he's an angel representing 
the sovereign Lord of all the universe. And if he commands 
you to go to Galilee and to tell the apostles, Then you go to 
Galilee and you tell the apostles. And notice the disposition they 
manifest. They went out quickly from the 
tomb with fear and great joy. Those things aren't contradictory 
to true religion. See, we have this idea that how 
can we be fearful and joyful at the same time? Because we're 
in the presence of God Most High. And when you're in the presence 
of God Most High, you fear, because He's God Most High. He is Creator 
and we're creature. But when you're in the presence 
of God Most High, you're joyful because you're in the presence 
of God Most High. Fear, trembling, and joy ought 
to be pervasive in the hearts of God's people in private worship, 
family worship, public worship. There ought to be a reverence 
and a respect for God and an awe for God that is mingled with 
great joy and thanksgiving. David's instruction in Psalm 
2 is to serve Yahweh with fear and rejoice with trembling. These two are consistent in biblical 
religion, and these two must be operative in the hearts of 
those who are conquered by biblical religion. Fear and great joy. And notice it's fear and great 
joy. The great may modify the fear 
too, but in the English translation, it looks the way it does for 
a reason. We have this fear and great joy. Now, notice secondly, the appearance 
of the Lord Jesus in verses 9 to 10. 9 and 10, we have his appearance, 
verse 9, and then his message in verse 10. So 9a, and as they 
went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them saying, rejoice. The extraordinary sight, Jesus 
met them. When had they last seen Jesus? They had last seen Jesus on the 
cross. Now the women attended to the 
burial, so they had seen his body placed into the tomb. But 
as far as they were concerned, he had been broken, he had been 
bloodied, he had been beaten, he had been bruised, he had been 
battered, he had been murdered by an ungodly state, driven by 
an ungodly religious body who got the people to cry out, away 
with him, away with him, crucify him. So now as they're going 
to tell the disciples, Jesus met them saying, And what he 
says is quite curious. He says, rejoice. France makes 
this observation. To say simply that Jesus met 
them when the last we saw of him was as a corpse sealed in 
a tomb is a masterly understatement. And his greeting, it's not just 
rejoice, it would be akin to our hello. Imagine that, you've 
raised from the dead, you see your disciples and that's what 
you have, hello. It's sublime, isn't it? We'd 
expect, guess what? Here I am. I don't know what 
I would do. I wouldn't make it to be known by everybody. He 
just simply says, hello. So back to France. To say simply 
that Jesus met them when the last we saw of him was as a corpse 
sealed in a tomb is a masterly understatement. And his greeting, 
it's carete, which is hello, is almost banal in its everyday 
familiarity. In other words, it wasn't the 
pomp and show that we would expect. It wasn't attended by all of 
the angelic hosts. Jesus meets them and Jesus says 
hello to them or rejoice to them. And then note their response, 
which is absolutely appropriate and which we should imitate. 
It says, so they came and held him by the feet and worshiped 
him. The women held him by the feet. 
Turn over to Luke 24 for just a moment. Luke chapter 24. One 
of the emphases in the post-resurrection appearances of our Lord to his 
disciples was to underscore that he wasn't a phantom, to underscore 
that it wasn't ethereal, but rather that it was physical, 
that it was historical, that it was a detail and a fact that 
was verifiable. Notice in Luke 24 verse 39. Behold, my hands and my feet, 
that it is I myself. Handle me and see, for a spirit 
does not have flesh and bones as you see I have." When he had 
said this, he showed them his hands and his feet. But while 
they still did not believe for joy and marvel, he said to them, 
have you any food here? So they gave him a piece of broiled 
fish and some honeycomb, and he took it and ate it in their 
presence. Now, we might think that's a 
curious statement because Luke wants to tell us that Jesus liked 
fish and honeycomb. No, it's underscoring the historicity 
of the resurrection of a physical being. He was crucified. He was 
broken. He was destroyed. He was dead. 
He goes into the tomb, and now he comes out of the tomb, the 
self-same Jesus, albeit glorified. And the fact that these women 
hold him by the feet to worship him, underscores the blessed 
truth that we call the hypostatic union, the two natures in the 
one person, the divine and the human. Now, feet aren't essential 
to humanity. You can be a human without feet, 
but it certainly does underscore the reality that one with feet 
was an object of worship and adoration and praise. by virtue 
of the union of the two natures in the one person. Matthew is 
doing theology. Matthew is narrating history. 
But Matthew is also educating, and encouraging, and nourishing, 
and sustaining, and blessing, and helping the church of Jesus 
Christ. He underscores both natures of 
Christ in terms of divinity and humanity. So that is the appearance 
of Jesus. Now notice Jesus' message to 
these ladies. Verse 10, Jesus said to them, 
do not be afraid. He says the same thing that the 
angel says. There is similarity there. He 
gives the same instruction that the angel gives, but there's 
a bit of dissimilarity. Look again at verse 7. Verse 
seven, and go quickly and tell his disciples. Look at what Jesus 
says, go and tell my brethren to go to Galilee and there they 
will see me. This reiterates an emphasis in 
Matthew's gospel that those who believe in Jesus are his sisters, 
his mothers, his brothers. There is that intimate connection 
between the head and his church. He refers to us as my brethren. And in terms of the grace and 
the mercy, it is obvious in this particular instance. It reflects 
the glory of the relationship between Christ and his people, 
and it rehearses that grace and mercy. For instance, go and tell 
my brethren to go to Galilee. We get to verse 16, there's 11 
disciples. What does that do? It encourages 
the church that while Peter denied his Lord, the Lord didn't cut 
him off. While Peter did what we should 
never do, there nevertheless was forgiveness with Peter. The 
12th, obviously, Judas was an apostate. There's no 12 apostles 
gathered at Mount Galilee. But there are 11, including Simon 
Peter, the one that Jesus says before the rooster crows three 
times, you will deny me. And he said, I'll never deny 
you. He was that sort of a man. And then he denies Jesus to the 
slave girl. In fact, look at Mark's account 
in Mark 16. And most of scholarship tells 
us and sees some connection between Peter and the gospel of Mark. 
I've shared my position that Mark was basically the recorder 
of Peter's sermons in Rome, and that became the gospel of Mark. 
But look at verse six in chapter 16. But he said to them, do not 
be alarmed. You seek Jesus of Nazareth, who 
was crucified. He is risen. He is not here. 
See the place where they laid him. But go tell his disciples 
and Peter that he is going before you into Galilee. There you will 
see him as he said to you. Now here's the connection. The 
11 disciples are present. Mark is writing at the behest 
of Peter. Peter draws attention to Peter. He wants to underscore the grace 
and mercy of Jesus Christ. Peter knows he denied the Lord. 
Peter knows that the rooster crowed. Peter knows that Jesus 
looked at him and then Peter wept bitterly. So Peter tells 
Mark as he's writing or when he's preaching to make sure you 
underscore that I'm a part of that blessed lot. Now here's 
the point, not so that people think they can go and deny me, 
but so that if they do sin, they'll remember they have an advocate 
with the Father, even Jesus Christ the righteous. So in something 
as obscure as this, we see a world of grace. and mercy and loving 
kindness on behalf of or on the part of our blessed Lord. Do 
not be afraid. Go and tell my brethren to go 
to Galilee and there they will see me." Calvin says it is proper 
to remark the astonishing kindness of Christ in dating to bestow 
the name of brethren on deserters who had basically forsaken him. 
Go back to chapter 26. Chapter 26 indicates not just 
Peter in verses 69 to 75, but as well all of the disciples 
according to verse 56. But all this was done that the 
scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled, then all the disciples 
forsook him and fled. Again, let me put this in theological 
language. What shall we say then? Shall 
we continue in sin that grace may abound? May it never be. But when we sin, we are never 
to forget the advocacy of our blessed Lord Jesus. Apostates 
will never seek to fetch out forgiveness. Apostates will never 
seek to repair as far as they're able to breach. But Christians 
that do horrifically sinful things will. Witness Peter. Witness 
David. Witness persons in the history 
of the church who have done something sinful. Witness yourself. When you go back, there is forgiveness 
that he may be feared. And that is a very blessed and 
most encouraging thought that arises from this passage. Go and tell my brethren to go 
to Galilee, and there they will see me. And that underscores 
the essence of eternal life. This is eternal life, that they 
may know thee, the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou 
hast sent. Notice what he says, and there 
they will see me. Isn't that the essence of our 
religion? Isn't that the sum and substance 
of everything? I mean, brethren, when we get 
to heaven, I don't think we're going to be looking at the gold 
on the ground. We're not going to be looking at the pearl on 
the gates. We're going to be looking at Immanuel. We're going 
to look at the king. We're going to look at the glorious 
Lord. We're going to look at the altogether lovely. We're 
going to look at the chief among ten thousand. We're not going 
to look at the crown he gifted, but we're going to look upon 
his pierced hand. Why? Because the Lamb is all 
the glory of Immanuel's land. The essence of our religion is 
found in this statement. and there they will see me." 
Now, in conclusion, we have first the glory of the resurrection. J. C. Ryle makes the observation 
concerning the resurrection. It is the crowning proof that 
he has paid the debt which he undertook to pay on our behalf. 
He won the battle which he fought to deliver us from hell and is 
accepted as our surety and substitute by our Father in heaven. Davies 
and Allison say 28.1 and following is the necessary ending to Matthew's 
story. Without the resurrection, Jesus' 
words are vacant and his opponents exonerated. With it, Jesus is 
vindicated, his cause and authority confirmed, and his opponents 
are disgraced. Praise God Almighty for that 
empty tomb and everything that was ever said ill about the Lord 
Jesus Christ. It was vanquished. It was banished. Christ is risen. Christ is enthroned 
at the right hand of God Almighty and Christ will return in glory 
to judge the living and the dead. He will vindicate His bride. 
Every bit of suffering, every bit of persecution, every wrong 
that has been inflicted upon the people of God will be made 
right by the Redeemer. Scripture tells us that when 
we enter into the New Jerusalem, God Himself will wipe away every 
tear from our eyes. You parents understand something 
of that by way of a human analogy. Your kid gets hurt, he comes 
running in. What do you do? Do you mock him? 
Do you upbraid him? No, you comfort him, you cheer 
him, you encourage him, and you wipe the tears from his eyes. 
Revelation depicts for us not a bunch of bluebirds attending 
our way onto heaven, but it shows the suffering and the distress 
and the tribulation associated with life in Christ's Church. 
But it ends with that blessed beatific vision of God Most High 
and the Lamb who sits upon the throne, where the curse is eliminated 
and where the nations dwell there in the presence of this blessed 
King. In terms of the fact of the resurrection, we have the 
confirmation of his death by soldiers, pilots, Jewish leaders, 
and the angel. The swoon theory and the Muslims are wrong! He died! That was the reality of it. It 
wasn't that he was mostly dead, placed into the tomb, and then 
rejuvenated and left on his own accord. He was dead. He was buried. That was confirmed by professionals. Do you think Roman soldiers didn't 
know what a dead man looked like? Do you think Roman soldiers didn't 
know how to dispatch persons? Do you think crucifixion was 
a way of escape with reference to capital punishment? No, when 
you got crucified, you died. The confirmation of his resurrection 
by the angel and Jesus himself. So it's not only the angel, but 
we have the Lord himself. And then subsequently, I'm just 
going to run through the resurrection appearances. He appeared first 
to the women who had left the tomb, Matthew 28, and then to 
Mary Magdalene, John 20. He appeared to Cleopas and the 
unnamed disciple on the road to Emmaus, Luke 24. He then appeared 
to Peter sometime that same afternoon, Luke 24, 1 Corinthians 15. He 
appeared to the 11 minus Thomas on the day of the resurrection 
in the upper room, Luke 24, John 20, and 1 Corinthians 15. He 
invited his disciples to touch him and he ate broiled fish and 
honeycomb among them, Luke 24. He appeared a week later to his 
disciples, this time Thomas was present, John 20. He appeared 
to seven of his disciples by the Sea of Tiberias, or Galilee, 
and prepared and ate breakfast with them, John 21. He appeared 
to the eleven on a mountain of Galilee, Matthew 28, and this 
occasion could have possibly been the one when he also appeared 
to the more than 500 people, 1 Corinthians 15. He appeared 
to James, his half-brother, 1 Corinthians 15. He appeared again to the 
eleven on the occasion of his ascension into heaven, Luke 24, 
Acts 1. He appeared to Saul of Tarsus 
some time later. Now listen, in terms of these 
appearances, he appeared to individuals, he appeared to a pair of disciples, 
he appeared to small groups, he appeared to large assemblies, 
he appeared to women and men, he appeared in public and in 
private, he appeared at different times of the day, and both in 
Jerusalem and Galilee. Now, this is not the testimony 
of a mass hallucination. This is history, theological 
history with great implications in terms of our justification, 
but it's history. It is replete, it is emphasized, 
it is repeated and reiterated a lot in the New Testament so 
that we'll understand it. You don't simply confess the 
Christian faith without any foundation or substance. The Christian faith 
is glorious because it's rooted in the finished work of our blessed 
Redeemer. It's not some existential leap, 
and we hope everything works out. We have the surety in the 
Savior himself who brought us life and salvation through his 
life, death, and resurrection. The recurring emphasis on seeing, 
come see the place, verse 6, there you will see him, verse 
7, and there they will see me, verse 10. All underscore the 
historicity of the resurrection. Now there are problems with the 
resurrection according to Psalm. Some suggest that these persons 
would have never recorded the appearances to angels. In fact, 
Josephus indicates, let not the testimony of women be admitted 
on account of the levity and boldness of their sex. Ladies, 
I don't read that to upset you, but just to make the point. Again, 
it underscores this reality. They report the facts. They don't 
massage the facts, they don't manipulate the facts, they don't 
present the facts in the way that they think the facts should 
be presented. They simply record the history. And if women are the first to 
discover the empty tomb, they're going to tell us that women discovered 
the empty tomb. And then the fact that the gospel 
records are not smoothed out. It was a man in the church, and 
he's dead now. And this was what brought him 
to Christ. He was an atheist. And he had 
a wife, and he had a couple of kids. And his wife said, can 
one of the kids go to the Sunday school? And he agreed. He thought 
that might be a good idea. And so he thought, well, I'll 
read through Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, just to get an idea 
of what's happening. It was that point that these gospel writers 
didn't smooth it out. They didn't massage it that underscored 
or indicated to him that it wasn't fabricated. Fabricators always 
put it in a way that they think will make the most impact. Again, 
witness the fake news. They present a narrative and 
they present it in such a way that you take it and you don't 
ever question it. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John 
are not beholden to some higher agency save God Almighty. And 
under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they're going to 
tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So 
the things that may seem to be obstacles in the reception of 
the historicity of the resurrection, all are actually seen as reasons 
why, or additional reasons why, we should accept that. And then 
finally, the theology of the resurrection. This is the fulfillment 
of the promises made concerning Jesus. The fact that he would 
be raised from the dead, you see it in Psalm 16, you see it 
at least implicitly in Psalm 22, you see it in the prophet 
Isaiah chapter 53, you see it in Daniel chapter 9. Those prophetic 
words concerning the life and ministry of Messiah indicate 
resurrection. Secondly, it's the means by which 
glory is given to the Father and to the Son. Notice in John 
17. John 17, verse 1. Jesus spoke these words and lifted 
up his Father to heaven and said, Father, the hour has come. Glorify 
your Son that your Son also may glorify you. Yes, death, but 
yes, resurrection. And then turn to Romans chapter 
1 to see the glory of the Son associated with the resurrection. Romans 1, beginning in verse 
1. a bondservant of Jesus Christ, 
called to be an apostle, separated to the gospel of God, which he 
promised before through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures, concerning 
his son Jesus Christ our Lord, who was born of the seed of David 
according to the flesh, and declared to be the Son of God with power, 
according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the 
dead. It's not that he was made the 
Son of God, but rather he was declared to be the Son of God. There is a big difference in 
terms of Christology that we will not get into presently. 
Thirdly, it is the crowning proof that he had accomplished the 
mission which the Father gave him. Romans 4.25, delivered up 
because of our offenses and raised for our justification. Hodge 
describes, he says, with a dead Savior, a Savior over whom death 
had triumphed and held captive, our justification had been forever 
impossible. John Fesco says, Christ's death 
atones for the sins of God's people. His resurrection is the 
evidence that death had an illegitimate claim upon Him, for He lived 
His life in perfect obedience to the law. Attempt to extract 
one of the three, life, death, or resurrection, from justification, 
and our redemption collapses. In other words, it's all of Christ 
for His people that is desperately necessary, because without all 
of Christ, we will go entirely to hell. And then the final observation, 
this is the truth without which we will die in our sins. Turn 
to 1 Corinthians chapter 15, we'll end here. 1 Corinthians 
chapter 15, the implication if Christ is not risen. Verse 12, 
Now if Christ is preached that he has been raised from the dead, 
how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the 
dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not 
risen. And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and 
your faith is also empty. Yes, and we are found false witnesses 
of God, because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, 
whom He did not raise up, if in fact the dead do not rise. 
For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. And 
if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile, you are still 
in your sins. Then also those who have fallen 
asleep in Christ have perished. If in this life only we have 
hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable. A denial 
of a future bodily resurrection on the part of the Corinthians 
was tacit to saying that Christ himself had not been raised. 
And so obviously that Christ has been raised ensures the resurrection 
of the dead for all of God's people. It is upon this hope 
that we find our souls. It is upon this hope that we 
find great encouragement. It is upon this hope that we 
soldier on and we hold the line. Let us pray. Our Father, we thank 
you for the resurrection of our blessed Savior. We thank you 
for not only the resurrection, but his life and his death. We 
thank you for the ascension, for the current session, the 
exaltation of our blessed Redeemer. And we look forward to his return 
and glory to judge the living and the dead. God, I pray that 
all of us would be fit and ready for that day, that we would be 
forgiven, that we would be clothed in his righteousness, and that 
you would bless us immeasurably. Go with us now and help us to 
glorify you on this day. We pray for this coming week 
that the hope, the thought of resurrection, glory will fill 
our hearts with great cheer and with great joy so that we can 
indeed persevere. And we ask this through Christ 
our blessed Lord. Amen.