← Back to sermon library
Well, you can turn with me in
your Bibles to Matthew chapter 27. Matthew chapter 27. We've been
considering Matthew's passion narrative. for a while now in
our Lord's Supper services, and I want to read beginning in Matthew
27 at verse 32. Now, as they came out, excuse
me, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name, him they compelled
to bear his cross. And when they had come to a place
called Golgotha, that is to say, place of a skull, they gave him
sour wine mingled with gall to drink. But when he had tasted
it, he would not drink. Then they crucified him and divided
his garments, casting lots, that it might be fulfilled which was
spoken by the prophet. They divided my garments among
them, and for my clothing they cast lots. Sitting down, they
kept watch over him there. And they put up over his head
the accusation written against him, This is Jesus, the King
of the Jews. Then two robbers were crucified
with Him, one on the right and another on the left. And those
who passed by blasphemed Him, wagging their heads and saying,
You who destroy the temple and build it in three days, save
yourself. If you are the Son of God, come
down from the cross. Likewise, the chief priests also,
mocking with the scribes and elders, said, He saved others,
Himself He cannot save. If He is the King of Israel,
let Him now come down from the cross, and we will believe Him.
He trusted in God, let Him deliver Him now, if He will have Him.
For He said, I am the Son of God. Even the robbers who were
crucified with Him reviled Him with the same thing. Now, from
the sixth hour until the ninth hour, there was darkness over
all the land. And about the ninth hour, Jesus
cried out with a loud voice saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani. That is, my God, my God, why
have you forsaken me? Some of those who stood there,
when they heard that, said, this man is calling for Elijah. Immediately,
one of them ran and took a sponge, filled it with sour wine, and
put it on a reed, and offered it to him to drink. The rest
said, let him alone. Let us see if Elijah will come
to save him. And Jesus cried out again with
a loud voice and yielded up his spirit. Then behold, the veil
of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom, and the earth
quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened, and
many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.
And coming out of the graves after his resurrection, they
went into the holy city and appeared to many. So when the centurion
and those with him who were guarding Jesus saw the earthquake and
the things that had happened, they feared greatly saying, truly,
this was the Son of God. And many women who followed Jesus
from Galilee, ministering to him, were there looking on from
afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James and
Joses, and the mother of Zebedee's sons. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our Father in heaven, we thank
you for your word. We thank you for this narrative
and for what it instructs us concerning the death of our Lord
Jesus Christ. We know that as a result of his
death and his resurrection, we have eternal life, and we praise
you for that. We ask now that you would guide
our thoughts and our meditation, that you would draw out our hearts
in love and worship and adoration. I do also want to pray for our
brother Jonathan Hall tonight, Ask God that you would continue
to watch over him and Selina and their little children, and
just bless in this whole process. And God, encourage all of us
now. There are many things going on
in the world today, many things that perplex our hearts and our
minds, and many things that drag us down, if we allow it. But
help us to be encouraged by the balm of Gilead. Help us to find
great nurture in the word of the living God. and especially
as we concentrate our energy upon the Son of Man who loved
us and who gave himself for us. Forgive us again for our sin
and transgression, guide and lead us by your Holy Spirit,
and we pray through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. Well, our focus
tonight is on verses 51 to 56. So the narrative that I read
has to do with the crucifixion of our Lord. So the crucifixion
proper is recorded in verses 32 to 38. And then you have the
mockery of Jesus while he is on the cross, verses 39 to 44.
and then the death of Jesus here specifically in 45 to 56. But as we narrow in on this particular
section, there is the cry of dereliction in verses 45 and
46, the mockery of the bystanders, again, verses 47 to 49, the death
of Jesus in verse 50, and then tonight the signs and wonders
after the crucifixion in verses 51 to 53, and then finally the
witnesses to the crucifixion. The women and the soldiers testify
great things concerning the Son of God who gave himself for us. Well, let's look first at the
signs and wonders following the crucifixion. There are three
recorded here. First, the torn veil, verse 51a. This is also parallel in Mark
and in Luke. Secondly, you have the earthquake
and rocks. That's unique to Matthew. The
other gospel writers do not record that. And then you have the resurrection
of the saints. in verses 52 and 53, again, unique
to Matthew. You won't find that in Mark or
in Luke. So the torn veil, the earthquake
and the rocks, and then the resurrection of the saints. I doubt that every
question will be answered tonight in terms of the resurrection
of the saints, but I'll simply try to point you in the right
direction. In the first place, notice the torn veil. Verse 50
tells us that Jesus cried out again with a loud voice and yielded
up his spirit. Then behold, the veil of the
temple was torn in two from top to bottom. Now commentators are
a bit divided upon this because we don't know if it was the inner
veil or the outer veil. There was an inner veil that
separated the holy place from the holy of holies. And then
there was an outer veil that separated the Holy Place from
the outer courtyard. And there is significance to
be found in both. With reference to the inner veil,
it would indicate or underscore that there is now access. As
well, there is no more sacrificial system. There is no more Old
Covenant legislation in terms of our approach to God. With
that inner veil rent from top to bottom, it shows the initiative
of God. It's not from bottom to top.
It's not man sort of making his way upward, but it is rather
from the top to the bottom indicating showing, demonstrating that God
is appeased, that atonement has been wrought, and now man has
access by God's grace through the mediation of our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ. One man says that the whole epistle
to the Hebrews is commentary on this split veil. Now, if it's
the outer veil, that's significant in terms of the impending judgment
upon Jerusalem. Now, these two concepts are not
far removed. Judgment typically implies salvation,
and salvation typically implies judgment. While Old Covenant
Israel is going to be cut off, and that's already been announced
by Jesus in Matthew chapters 23 and chapter 24, there is that
opening up in terms of the New Covenant, that blessed era prophesied
in the Old Testament, inaugurated by the Lord Jesus Christ, wherein
access to the Father is through the Son. the one who yielded
up his spirit, the one who rendered up a blood atonement, the one
who was the sacrifice for his people. So the judgment aspect,
again, I think it's there. Matthew Poole makes this comment.
By this rending of the veil, God testified his wrath against
the Jews, and that he was leaving his temple amongst them. Spurgeon
says, as if shocked at the sacrilegious murder of her lord, the temple
rent her garments like one stricken with horror at some stupendous
crime. Again, these concepts are mingled. The new covenant is initiated,
is inaugurated, and it is signified here by the renting of this temple. So the veil is torn from top
to bottom, indicating God's activity in bringing salvation to his
people. Every attempt by man in terms of false religion is
an attempt by man in vain to gain access to God. The only
way that sinners have access to God is if God initiates, is
if God orchestrates, if God actually puts into practice a way or means
by which sinners can come into his presence. That is signified
by the rent veil from the top to the bottom. As well, the veil
that prohibited access to the Holy of Holies is torn, indicating
now that the sinner has approached into the Holy of Holies. And
again, that is made much of in the book of Hebrews by the Apostle
Paul. So we have access into that Holy
of Holies, and if you're thinking in terms of Old Testament religion,
that was only for the high priest on the Day of Atonement. We have
this priesthood of believers today that is most excellent
in the new covenant. We are those who, by God's grace,
have access into God's holy presence. Again, not because of our good
works, not because of our virtue or our law keeping, but because
of what Christ has wrought in terms of His atonement on the
cross for His people. And the veil is torn, and that
serves as a visible display of the covenantal transformation.
Again, that will happen in A.D. 70, when Jerusalem is surrounded
by her enemies, when the temple is destroyed, when the city is
sacked, and when the Jews go into exile. But with reference
to the rending of the veil, the veil is torn and that serves
as a visible display of the covenantal transformation involved and the
fulfillment of the ceremonial law. For those who witness or
rather attend the Wednesday night or the confession study, there's
three divisions in the law of God. There's the moral law, there's
the judicial law, and then there's the ceremonial law. And the ceremonial
law was extant or present in Old Covenant religion. It prefigured
Christ. It pointed forward to the Lord
Jesus by virtue of a lot of different ways and sacrifices and means. They were tutored to look forward
to the coming Messiah. Well, by the sacrifice of our
Lord Jesus Christ, that has been fulfilled. Again, I think I mentioned
this recently, we don't have sacrifice. Tonight what we engage
in is not atonement. This is not a bloodless atonement
vis-a-vis Roman Catholicism. It is a means of grace. It is
a time and a special way to remember our Lord's death on our behalf.
But we're not sacrificing. There's no incense. There's no
animals that we bring into this place. Why? Because the ceremonies
of Moses have been fulfilled by our Lord Jesus Christ. The
temple was under that same sort of an operation. Now that Jesus
has come, there's no significance in an earthly temple. This idea
of dispensational theology to rebuild the temple in the city
of Jerusalem to await for the Lord Jesus Christ is to go precisely
backward in redemptive history. The temple stood to point to
the Lord Jesus. Now that the Lord Jesus is here,
we don't have to have a temple. We certainly don't have blood
atonement in terms of animal sacrifice. That is a backward
motion in terms of redemptive history. John Calvin comments,
for then Christ, the true and everlasting priest, having abolished
the figures of the law, opened up for us by his blood the way
to the heavenly sanctuary, that we may no longer stand at a distance
within the porch, but may freely advance into the presence of
God. That is, I think, a good take-home message. There may
be some confusion in terms of the inner veil, in terms of the
outer veil, in terms of salvation, in terms of judgment, in terms
of ceremonies, and in terms of what is binding in new covenant
religion. But let this fester, or rather
simmer, in your heart. What he says, we may freely advance
into the presence of God. What was reserved for the high
priest on the Day of Atonement alone has now been opened up
through the high priestly office of our Lord Jesus Christ, so
that we have access to the Father through the mediation of the
Son in the presence and the power of the Holy Spirit. such that
the church, as it were, enters into the very new Jerusalem when
we gather together for corporate worship. We can advance, we can
enter the holy of holies. Now notice, secondly, the earthquake
and rocks in verse 51b. So then, behold, the veil of
the temple was torn in two from top to bottom, and the earth
quaked and the rocks were split. Davies and Allison say God vindicates
his son with a shower of astounding miracles. Nature speaks again
and loudly. If you go back to verse 45, now
from the sixth hour until the ninth hour there was darkness
over all the land. So the created order speaks at
the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ. It is as it were, as
if the created order is underscoring the significance of what is transpiring
in the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. One man says, as the
skies darken before Jesus' death, now the earth trembles after
it. So you have this statement, the
earthquake and the rocks were split. Turn back to the book
of Judges to see the significance involved in this language. Several
passages underscore for us what is in view here. Remember that
it's not only the death of Jesus in its positive aspect in terms
of opening to us the Holy of Holies. But there's also the
judgment upon the nation that has taken the Lord of glory and
has crucified Him. So these Jews, these lawless
men, appeal to Pontius Pilate because they don't possess the
prerogative of execution of criminal offenders. So they set up the
case, they present it to Pilate, Pilate, because he's a coward,
kowtows to mob rule, and what we have here is the greatest
crime that ever transpired. Christ is holy, harmless, and
undefiled. There was nothing in him deserving
the treatment that he received at the hands of men. So this
phenomena that occurs in the natural order again underscores
the significance of the event, but it also thunders forth God's
judgment over those rejecters. Notice in Judges 5 at verses
4 and 5 in the Song of Deborah. Lord, when you went out from
Seir, When you marched from the field of Edom, the earth trembled
and the heavens poured. The clouds also poured water.
The mountains gushed before the Lord, this Sinai, before the
Lord God of Israel. Turn over to Psalm 114. Psalm
114. The significance of this is that
God intervenes, and the significance of this is that He not only intervenes,
but He shows His disapproval of their action. In other words,
he is intending to bring judgment to bear upon them. That was announced
in chapters 23 and 24 with the destruction of Jerusalem that
would occur in AD 70. But notice in Psalm 114, specifically
at verses 7 and 8. Tremble, O earth, at the presence
of the Lord, at the presence of the God of Jacob, who turned
the rock into a pool of water, the flint into a fountain of
waters. And then in terms of judgment,
look at the prophet Jeremiah. Jeremiah chapter 10. So we've
got God's intervention and we've got God's judgment. Jeremiah
chapter 10, verse 10. But the Lord is the true God.
He is the living God and the everlasting King. At His wrath,
the earth will tremble and the nations will not be able to endure
His indignation. the minor prophet, Joel, Hosea,
Joel, the second of the minor prophets, chapter three, verse
16, same sort of an emphasis, the judgment of God as demonstrated
through the natural order. So Joel 3.16, the Lord also will
roar from Zion and utter his voice from Jerusalem. The heavens
and earth will shake, but the Lord will be a shelter for his
people and the strength of the children of Israel. And then
the prophet Nahum, just go a few books further and you'll see
the prophet Nahum. This is a prophecy of judgment
against the city of Nineveh. You remember that Jonah was sent
on that mission of mercy to preach to the city of Nineveh. Well,
the Ninevites repented, but their repentance wasn't lasting. And
so the prophet Nahum prophesied concerning their impending doom.
And then you notice in chapter one of the prophet Nahum, specifically
at verses five and six, the mountains quake before him, the hills melt,
and the earth heaves at his presence. Yes, the world and all who dwell
in it. Who can stand before his indignation and who can endure
the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire
and the rocks are thrown down by him. So back to Matthew 27,
it's God's intervention wherein this phenomena happens. But it's
demonstrative of God's judgment. And if these godless, Christ-rejecting
Jews had pondered their own scriptures, they would have stood in fear.
There's no sense of that whatsoever. They continue impenitent, they
continue rebellious, they continue in that place of rejecting both
Yahweh and His Christ. Matthew Henry said, the earth,
by trembling under such a load, bore its testimony to the innocence
of Him that was persecuted, and against the impiety of those
that persecuted Him. Never did the whole creation
before, grown under such a burden as the Son of God crucified,
and the guilty wretches that crucified Him. So we would expect
this in terms of the significance of the event that it would be
attended by this phenomena. But it does demonstrate to us
not only the salvation of the elect as they have access to
the Holy of Holies, but the damnation of those who reject and those
who continue in penitent. Back to Matthew chapter 27, we
have the third aspect in terms of the resurrection of the saints.
If you look at verse 52, It says, and the graves were opened, and
many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.
And coming out of the graves after his resurrection, they
went into the holy city and appeared to many. This demonstrates Christ's
power over the grave. This demonstrates what will be
admitted or rather testified by Jesus in John's gospel in
John 5, 24 to 29. He has the power over the grave.
But when we look at that particular passage, we need to make a stop
at the end of opened. Because as the text is punctuated,
at least in the New King James, the idea is that the graves opened,
the saints were resurrected, and then they sat in the grave
for three days. And then they exited the grave
when Jesus rose from the dead. Their resurrection is connected
to Jesus' resurrection. That's the way the text is to
be interpreted. Notice, and the graves were open,
full stop, period. And many bodies of the saints
who had fallen asleep were raised. And coming out of the graves
after his resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared
to many. So you see the process or the
trajectory there. You've got the graves open when
the Son of Man dies. But then three days later, many
of these saints are raised at that point. It is consistent
with the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. Calvin says,
there is no probability in the conjecture of some commentators
that after having received life and breath, they remain three
days concealed in their graves. That's not what happened. So
the graves were open, preparatory for the resurrection that would
take place when Jesus rose from the dead. Now, in terms of the
significance of this particular passage, it foreshadows chapter
28. It foreshadows the reality that
Christ will rise from the dead. So in verse 50, you have the
statement, Jesus cried out again with a loud voice and yielded
up his spirit. And then here in verse 53, and
coming out of the graves after his resurrection. So it foreshadows,
as I said, chapter 28. If there were no chapter 28,
you still have a Christ resurrected from the dead. As well, it underscores
the efficacy of Christ's atoning work. So when that veil is rent
from the top to the bottom, that is God's signature that what
Christ has accomplished is efficacious. It is approved by the Father.
It is accepted. The way of access has been gained.
We now have the ability to go behind the veil into the very
Holy of Holies and to meet with God Most High. So we have the
efficacy of Christ's work underscored by His resurrection from the
dead. And then notice this identification
of many saints. It says, and many bodies of the
saints who had fallen asleep were raised. We don't know who
they are. It doesn't give us their names.
It doesn't give us their identities. It doesn't tell us either their
status. Did they continue on in their
lives the way that Lazarus, who was raised from the dead, did?
Or did they ascend at the time that our Lord Jesus ascended?
Commentators are divided on either way. But we do know, we don't
know who they are, but we do know this. that they were saints
that were resurrected by virtue of the work of the Lord Jesus
Christ. In other words, His life, His
death, His resurrection was applied to all those prior to Him. Turn
to the book of Hebrews where you see that. You see a retrospective
application of the finished work of our Lord Jesus to old covenant
saints. Hebrews chapter 9. The point
is simple. Anyone who has ever entered into
the presence of God has done so on the basis of the active
and passive obedience of our Lord Jesus Christ. Enoch walked
with God and then he was not. Abel was a righteous man who
passed into the presence of God. How did they enter in? through
the blood atonement wrought out by our Lord Jesus Christ. The
way we look back in history at that event, it has blessing for
us. In the same manner, that event
had blessing for those prior to the cross. Notice in Hebrews
9.15, And for this reason, He is the mediator of the New Covenant,
by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the
First Covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise
of the eternal inheritance. Look at chapter 10, verse 1,
for the law, having a shadow of the good things to come, and
not the very image of the things can never, with these same sacrifices,
which they offer continually year by year, make those who
approach perfect. For then would they not have
ceased to be offered. For the worshipers once purified
would have had no more consciousness of sins. But in those sacrifices,
there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is not possible
that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins. They were
typological. They pointed forward to the Lamb
of God who takes away the sin of the world. But they weren't
efficacious to bring sinners into the presence of God Most
High. That is reserved solely for the work of our Lord Jesus
Christ. And then one final observation
before we leave these saints. Notice what it says. Verse 53.
and coming out of the graves after his resurrection, they
went into the holy city and appeared to many. This as well foreshadows the
nature of the Christian hope. I have suggested before that
we are not Gnostics. Gnostics believe that the body
isn't incidental. It's sort of a necessary evil. It's not all that, you know,
it's just not something that is an end. That's why, you know,
in 1 John, for instance, and in 2 John, the apostle there
emphasizes that Jesus has come in the flesh. Why? Because not
fully developed Gnosticism in play at that point, but at least
in sort of seed form Gnosticism, they rejected the idea of the
physical. They rejected the idea of the
bodily. You see that through the history
of the church as well. Roman Catholicism, for instance,
teaching that marriage, the only reason for marriage is for procreation. Now that's certainly an aspect
of marriage, but there's other parts to it as well. You know,
the emphasis in Rome about not eating meat on Friday during
Lent or, you know, not eating whatever. There is this sort
of degradation of the physical among some who profess faith
in Christ. And I think we can fall prey
to that as well and somehow think that the end of redemption is
simply the soul in the presence of God Most High. That's not
it, brethren. We believe in the resurrection
from the dead. We believe in life eternal in
the age to come. body and soul. One man says matter
matters. God made it in creation, took
it on in incarnation, and raises it again in resurrection. Bodies
are not immaterial or unimportant to the biblical God. They matter
so much that God raises them. In the Apostles' Creed, we joyfully
confess, I believe in the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting. So brethren, this is a foreshadow
of that. It's not just a sort of a bodiless
spiritual existence when we get to heaven. No, there's gonna
be a general resurrection. All of the bodies that are dead
will be raised, reunited to their souls, and brought into the presence
of God Most High, where we body and soul will live forever and
ever, praising Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. So that is foreshadowed
here as well. And then it says that they went
into the holy city, Jerusalem, and appeared to many. Christ
is the first fruits of the resurrection. We see that pattern. Their resurrection
is connected to His resurrection. But the saints went into the
holy city and appeared to many to confirm that the Christ who
had been crucified has now been raised from the dead. They didn't
just do this as some sort of a parlor trick. They didn't do
this just because, hey, look, I was dead and here I am. They
did it to testify to the efficacious work of the Son of God who loved
us and gave himself for us. They were testifiers. They were
witnesses. They were those who shone the
light of God's glory upon the resurrection of Jesus Christ
our Lord. So those are the signs and wonders
following the crucifixion. Let's look finally at the witnesses
to the crucifixion. Very intriguing what we have
here in verses 54 to 56. In the first place, you have
the confession of the soldiers. This is no small confession either. This is a robust, excellent confession
made by these soldiers. Notice in verse 54, So when the
centurion and those with him who were guarding Jesus saw the
earthquake and the things that had happened, they feared greatly,
saying, Truly this was the Son of God. Now, in terms of their
identity, John tells us there were four soldiers present at
the cross to make sure that everything happened in an orderly way. This
wasn't their first rodeo. This is what they did. Now, when
it says that they feared greatly when this earthquake comes, that
indicates the supernatural character of the earthquake. They had done
many a crucifixion that were not attended by earthquakes.
This one happened to be. So in terms of these men, they're
the four specifically tasked with carrying out his execution.
They are the ones, according to 27 to 31, who mocked him. Look back at 27 to 31. They mocked our Lord Jesus Christ. They cast lots for his garments,
according to verse 35, which is indicative of the fact that
Christ hung on that cross naked. He had no clothing on. Typically
in Christian art, they put something covering his private parts. That's
not the way the text reads. The text reads that he was naked
on that cross. As well, they were the ones who
kept watch over him, according to verse 36, and the ones who
witnessed all that he had suffered on the cross. So that's who they
are. But in terms of their fear, again,
look at the passage. when they saw the earthquake
and the things that had happened. So the rent veil, they knew the
effect of the earthquake, and then the rocks were split. They
knew that the graves were open, but again, the actual bodies
weren't raised until connection with Jesus' resurrection. But
they saw this phenomena, and then it says they feared greatly.
They feared greatly. They knew they weren't doing
a normal process in this execution. They knew there was something
atypical about this particular event. And then notice their
confession. Truly, this was the Son of God. Now this is ironic, because previously
in the passage, people were walking by, wagging their heads and mocking
Him, challenging Him, if He is the Son of God, let Him come
down from that cross. The religious leaders themselves
mocked Him in that particular way. So the rejection of the
Son of God on the part of the Jewish leaders and the people
of Israel makes this that much more glorious. They, the ones
to whom He came, the very nation from whom Messiah comes, He comes
to His own, His own receive Him not. They don't confess Him as
the Son of God. They use that as a taunt. They
use that as ridicule. They use that as mockery. They
use that as a means by which to blaspheme Him. And yet the
Roman soldiers, men associated with death, Men associated with
pain and torment and punishment. Men who, again, this was not
their first rodeo. They nevertheless confess that
Jesus is the Son of God. Davies and Allison say the soldiers
who are set up as witnesses in verse 36 take up the title used
to ridicule Jesus in verses 40 and 43 and make it a sincere
confession. As well, the confession of the
Son of God in light of what they knew. Think about what these
men had seen. They had seen the charge above
his head. This is Jesus, the King of the
Jews. They had heard the mockery in
verses 40 and 43. The idea that Christ was, in
fact, the Son of God. They hear Jesus cry in terms
of his commitment of his spirit to the Father in Luke's gospel. And then their time in Israel.
They would have had some concept of Messiah. They weren't ruler,
at least in terms of military, over these people. They would
be somewhat familiar with some of the idioms of their religion
and of the messianic expectation. And so this is an accurate confession. Truly, this was the Son of God.
And then... In terms of Matthew's gospel,
we see it very specifically in John. So John starts off, in
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the
Word was God. And then John ends with Thomas'
confession, my Lord and my God. What is John trying to communicate
to us? He's trying to communicate to
us theology proper. He's identifying for us who the
Word is. He's telling us that Jesus is
the second person of the triune God, who for us men and for our
salvation came down from heaven. It's not as obvious in Matthew's
gospel, but it is as obvious in Matthew's gospel. If you think
about Matthew's Gospel, this confession of Jesus as the Son
of God is made by the Father. The Father makes this confession
in chapter 3 at verse 17 at the baptism of the Lord. The Father
makes this confession in chapter 17 at the transfiguration of
our Lord. The disciples on a couple of
occasions in Matthew's Gospel confess that Jesus is the Son
of God. Jesus himself obviously claims
to be the Son of God in Matthew's Gospel. And even the demons in
chapter 8 at verse 29 confess that Jesus is the Son of God. And so when we read this by the
soldiers, they were absolutely positively right on. They were
correct. They weren't just taking a stab
at some theological guess, but rather Matthew is showing us
that this one who is crucified is in fact the Son of God. The
religious leaders and the pastors by of Israel rejecting their
Messiah would wag their heads and mock him for claiming to
be the Son of God. And yet these Roman soldiers
now confess that he is, in fact, the son of God. Bruner makes
this good observation. He says, it pleases Matthew that
just as it was Gentile magi who first honored Jesus' birth in
Matthew 2, so it is now Gentile militia who first honor Jesus'
death. They say, they affirm, they confirm
that what we know of a truth and what was completely rejected
by this audience is the reality. And then Bruner says that Luther
believed that the soldier's confession, quote, is a sign of the power
of the death of Christ. The blood of Christ not only
wakens dead bodies, but also sinners' souls. These were sinner
souls who had been awakened through the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. Brethren, we may sit with Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob, and the four soldiers who conducted the execution
of our Lord Jesus Christ. They made the good confession.
Think back to Matthew chapter 16. Who do men say that I, the
Son of Man, am? The apostles say, well, there's
all these people out there with all these conjectures out there,
and then Jesus brings it to bear upon his own. Who do you say
that I am? And Peter confesses, thou art
the Christ, the son of the living God. And Jesus says, blessed
are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood did not reveal
this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. He was the one
that made this known. So these soldiers make the proper
confession concerning Jesus Christ, and they say, truly, this was
the Son of God. And then notice the presence
of the women. The presence of the women. There
are three things here. Their devotion. They had followed
Jesus about 80 to 100 miles from Galilee. They had ministered
to Jesus on several occasions. That they look on from afar here
is no bad testimony on them. It is simply a matter of fact.
In terms of their identity, we are told Mary Magdalene, Mary
the mother of James and Joseph, probably not Jesus' mother, and
then the mother of Zebedee's sons. Remember, it was the mother
of Zebedee's sons that brought her two precious boys to our
Lord Jesus when they were jockeying for position. at the right hand
of the Son of God. Remember that passage in Matthew
chapter 20? Jesus says, I have a baptism to undergo. I have
a cup to drink to undergo that you men know nothing up. And
so when it comes to push or when it comes to crunch time, guess
where the sons of Zebedee are not? They're not present at the
cross, but their mother is. Now, why does Matthew include
this bit of information here? Well, in the first place, there's
an apologetic significance. Apologetic significance. Bruner,
again, says, precisely because women's witness was not considered
dependable in Israel's courts. Now, that makes us go nuts in
the 21st century, but that's just not the way it was back
then. Right? It was the way. I'm not saying
it was right. I'm not condoning it. I'm not
saying that women's testimony shouldn't be valid in a court
of law, but it's simply reporting what was. It's just the way that
it was. We can't go back and clean up
history. We can't go back and refashion history. We can't go
back and fix history. It's an impossible task. We learn
from history, we praise God for history, we extol the heroes
in history, and we castigate the wretches in history. But
we can't go back and police history. But in terms of the apologetic
significance, again, Bruner, He says, precisely because women's
witness was not considered dependable in Israel's courts, the canonical
writers would have had male witnesses present at these crucial events
if they had invented the stories. In other words, that women were
the witnesses and that the canonical writers, Matthew, Mark, Luke,
and John, record that evidence that they're committed to the
truth. They're not shaping their narrative. They're not saying
in their first century context, well, nobody's gonna believe
the testimony of women, so we'll excise them from the narrative
and we'll put in a faithful body of men. That's not what they
do. There's apologetic value to the reality of what we find
in the gospel records at the level of the women's witness. As well, notice the contextual
significance. They are present at his death
here, they are present at his burial, verse 61, and they are
present at his resurrection in 28, verse 1 and following. And then in terms of the practical
significance, the male disciples are not there. It's not saying
that women are better than men. It's just simply a commentary
on what happened in terms of the crucifixion of our Lord. You had the bravado of a Simon
Peter who said, I will never deny you. He denies Jesus to
a servant girl. We see in Matthew 26 that all
the disciples flee from him. And yet here are these faithful
women. The Bible's not anti-woman. The Bible's not chauvinistic.
The Bible doesn't have an axe to grind against women. Again,
persons think that. They assume that. They operate
with that mindset. But it's simply false. It's simply
incorrect. It is simply wrong. Matthew dignifies
these women by demonstrating their presence at the death,
burial, and resurrection of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ. Calvin
says, but praise is bestowed on the women alone who accompanied
Christ till death because their extraordinary attachment to their
master was more strikingly displayed when the men fled trembling. And Calvin's not saying bad men,
they're horrible men, they're satanic men, they're in hell
kind of men. That's not what he's saying.
He's simply commending the faith of these women who were present
at the death, the burial, and the resurrection, in spite of
the fact that the men had fled when the going got tough. After
having promised that I will die for you, I will not deny you,
whatever comes your way, I will be right there with you. Well,
when push came to shove, off they went. Which, before we close,
doesn't that illustrate the beauty of the gospel? What does Jesus
not do? You guys deserted me, so forget
it. You guys deserted me, so I'm
cutting you off. You guys deserted me, so I'm
done with you. No, the glory of the gospel is
that God's not done with us. The glory of the gospel is that
there is forgiveness with thee that thou mayest be feared. The
glory of the gospel is that if we confess our sins, he is faithful
and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. The glory of the gospel is that
through the blood atonement of our Lord Jesus Christ, through
the rending of that veil, the opening up to the Holy of Holies,
once By grace, a sinner is conquered, then that sinner is conquered
forever. He doesn't lose his salvation
because he has a lapse. He doesn't lose his salvation
because he has remaining corruption. He doesn't lose that salvation
because ultimately that would reflect upon the Savior. Either
he comes to save his people from their sins, or he doesn't. And
if a man can be truly saved and then lost, that reflects upon
the ability or the lack of ability on the Savior himself. So this
idea that sinners for whom Jesus died and rose again can somehow
lose their salvation, again, it's been well said, if we could,
we would. Absolutely, positively, in a
moment. If the church could have been
destroyed by now, it would have been destroyed by now. God Most
High is in control of the church, and He's in control of individual
sinners, and we rejoice in that. Well, in conclusion, a couple
of thoughts, and then we move to the supper. First, the efficacy
of the atoning work of Christ. From chapter 27, verse 32, to
chapter 27, to verse 56, the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus
Christ is all according to the plan and purpose of God. This
wasn't invented by men. This wasn't conceptualized by
some drama school. This was the plan and purpose
of God Most High in order to save His people from their sins.
That whole detailed legislation that we have in the Old Testament
is preparatory. I hope that as you read through
the Old Testament now, you feel that sense of preparation. You
know this is going somewhere. You know that there's purpose
here. You know that every sacrifice, every detail, every jot, every
tittle of that ceremonial law is pointing forward to and prefiguring
the coming of the Son of God, who will save His people from
their sins. And with reference to the efficacy,
we see it in the rent veil. We see it in the resurrection
from the dead. We see the power of Jesus in
inaugurating the new covenant. J.C. Ryle says, the rending of
the veil proclaimed the termination and passing away of the ceremonial
law. It was a sign that the old dispensation
of sacrifices and ordinances was no longer needed. Now brethren,
when we talk like this, it doesn't mean it was bad. It rather means
it was temporary. There was built-in an obsolescence
with reference to the old covenant system. It was built-in. It prefigured. It typified. It pointed forward to the coming
of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. So
when we talk about no more ceremonial law, it's not some triumphalistic
way saying, oh, the ceremonial law was bad. It was bad, it was,
no, no, no, no, no. It was given for a time to keep
the children of Israel under check, to tutor them in terms
of their Messiah, and to provide for them gracious confirmation
of God's saving interest in them. And so while it was in play,
it was a most blessed institution. But that Jesus comes to fulfill
and therefore abrogates or abolishes the ceremonies, He does so through
fulfillment. He does so through realization. Back to Ryle. He says, it was
a sign that the old dispensation of sacrifices and ordinances
was no longer needed. Its work was done. Its occupation
was gone from the moment that Christ died. There was no more
need of an earthly high priest and a mercy seat and a sprinkling
of blood and an offering up of incense in a day of atonement.
The true high priest had at length appeared. The true Lamb of God
had been slain. The true mercy seat was at length
revealed. The figures and shadows were
no longer needed. May we all remember this. To
set up an altar and a sacrifice and a priesthood now is to light
a candle at noonday. Obviously, he's taken a shot
at Roman Catholicism, that has a priesthood, that has altars,
that has sacrifice, that has a tabernacle, that has all those
things that have been rendered obsolete, not because they were
bad, but because they were fulfilled. Christ said, it is finished. There is no more ceremonies of
Moses that the people of God must imbibe. That's why Paul
in Galatians, for instance, takes aim at those who underscore circumcision
along with faith as a means for justification. No. Circumcision
was part of the ceremonial law. It set apart the nation of Israel.
It prefigured certain things. It was typical of certain things.
Now that Christ has come, there's no more religious obligation
on the people of God to get or not get circumcised. If somebody
wants to do that for cultural or ethnic or whatever, they're
free to do that. But the moment that one thinks
it has religious significance, they fall under the anathema
of the apostle Paul in the book of Galatians. As well, we see
not only the power of Jesus in the inauguration of the new covenant,
but the power of Jesus over sin. Access to God has been provided
by God. The veil is rent from the top
to the bottom. all of our attempts, all of our
efforts, all of the things that man, I don't mean us specifically
here, but mankind in general. The apostle summarizes it in
1 Corinthians 1, for since in the wisdom of God, the world
through wisdom did not know God, but they tried, they tried to
gain access. The philosophers spoke at length
about God. The Jews certainly had a, had
the old covenant scriptures and all those sorts of things, but
when they weren't living by faith in that God, they were trying
to do it on their own. That's always the common report
from every man, is that he tries to go it on his own. Not Christianity. Christianity is about a seeking
God. Christianity is about the God of Luke 19, 10. The Son of
Man came to seek and to save that which was lost. We have
victory over sin in our Lord Jesus Christ. And as well, you
have the power of Jesus over the grave and death. The apostle
in 1 Corinthians chapter 15 says, death is swallowed up in victory.
O death, where is your sting? O Hades, where is your victory? We have that communicated to
us in the opening of the graves, in the rising up of the many
saints, and in their going into the holy city to testify that
Jesus Christ is risen. Jesus Christ has power over death. Jesus Christ has power over the
grave. And Jesus Christ will usher His
beloved church into His presence. forever and ever and ever. And that, my brothers and sisters,
is a most encouraging benefit of our religion. Our people die,
but they die well. They enter into the presence
of Emmanuel. They go to that place where there's
no more sorrow, there's no more pain, there's no more suffering.
They go to that place where there's no more hunger, where there's
no more thirst. They go to that place where there's
no more sin. They stand before the throne
of God day and night, crying out, salvation belongs to our
God and to the Lamb who sits upon the throne. And you know
what else is not present in the New Jerusalem? Death itself. That is the last enemy that Christ
defangs according to 1 Corinthians chapter 15 and verse 28. Death punctuates this lower world. Death is a grief. Death is sorrowful. Death does hurt. But in the new
Jerusalem, there's no more death. Our Savior is victorious. Our
Savior is triumphant. And our Savior has removed the
fangs from the grave itself. And in that, God's people rejoice. Well, let us pray. Our Father in heaven, we thank
you for the work of Jesus Christ. Every time we remind ourselves
of the gospel of our salvation, we stand amazed that you would
choose to save wretches like us. that according to your good
pleasure you chose us in Him before the foundation of the
world, and that in your time you sent Him. It wasn't us who
asked, it wasn't us who fetched, it wasn't us who deserved, but
you sent the Son of your love into this world, sinners to save.
We thank you for that life of obedience. We thank you for the
death at Calvary. God, as we survey this particular
scene, as we see this veil rent from top to bottom, as we see
access into the Holy of Holies opened up by our Savior, we stand
amazed and we give you praise and glory and adoration. And
we ask that you would comfort and encourage our hearts tonight,
that you would build us up in our most holy faith, and that
God, as we continue to diverse distance in this present world,
we would do so with that cheerful disposition, knowing that when
we breathe our last, we'll enter into the presence of a gracious
and a good and a holy God. And as well, help us to look
forward to the resurrection from the dead, because it's not just
the intermediate state that is the Christian hope, but it is
rather that resurrection, that day when you will summons all
men everywhere to rise up. You will knit body and soul back
together. You will bring the righteous
into your presence, where we may enjoy our blessed God, body
and soul, world without end. We bless and praise you for these
mercies and these graces that you've given to us. We bless
and we praise you for the goodness that you have shown to us in
the gospel of our salvation. And again, Father, we are jealous
and desirous that others would know this truth as well, that
you would convict sinners, that you would show them it's not
their works, it's not their deeds, it's not their subscription to
ceremonies in terms of law. but it is belief on the Savior
for salvation. God, do this for your glory.
Do this for the good of souls from every tribe and tongue and
people and nation. And may you demonstrate your
power and your sovereignty and your majesty in the saving of
sinners by grace through faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. And
we pray in his blessed name. Amen.