The Parable of the Vineyard, Part 1
Sermons on Matthew
Please turn with me in your Bibles to Matthew chapter 21. Matthew chapter 21. Our focus this morning is on the parable of the vineyard, also known as the parable of the wicked tenants. Because it's such a packed section, we're going to just take up the giving of the parable this morning and then, God willing, next week we'll look at the question concerning the parable. the implications drawn from the parable and the response to the parable. But I do want to read it in its larger context, so I'll begin reading in Matthew 21 at verse 23. Now, when he came into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people confronted him as he was teaching and said, by what authority are you doing these things? And who gave you this authority? But Jesus answered and said to them, I also will ask you one thing, which if you tell me, I likewise will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, where was it from? From heaven or from men? And they reasoned among themselves saying, if we say from heaven, he will say to us, why then did you not believe him? But if we say from men, we fear the multitude, for all count John as a prophet. So they answered Jesus and said, We do not know. And he said to them, neither will I tell you by what authority I do these things. But what do you think? A man had two sons and he came to the first and said, son, go work today in my vineyard. He answered and said, I will not. But afterward he regretted it and went. Then he came to the second and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go, sir. But he did not go. Which of the two did the will of his father? They said to him, the first. Jesus said to them, assuredly I say to you that tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom of God before you. For John came to you in the way of righteousness and you did not believe him. But tax collectors and harlots believed him. And when you saw it, you did not afterward relent and believe him. Here another parable. There was a certain landowner who planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it, dug a wine press in it, and built a tower. And he leased it to vinedressers and went into a far country. Now when vintage time drew near, he sent his servants to the vinedressers that they might receive its fruit. And the vinedressers took his servants, beat one, killed one, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants, more than the first, and they did likewise to them. And last of all, he sent his son to them saying, they will respect my son. But when the vinedresser saw the son, they said among themselves, this is the heir. Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance. So they took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those vinedressers? They said to him, he will destroy those wicked men miserably and lease his vineyard to other vinedressers who will render to him the fruits in their seasons. Jesus said to them, have you never read in the scriptures, the stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone. This was the Lord's doing and it is marvelous in our eyes. Therefore, I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. And whoever falls on this stone will be broken, but on whomever it falls, it will grind him to powder. And when the chief priests and Pharisees heard his parables, they perceived that he was speaking of them. When they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitudes because they took him for a prophet. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our Father in Heaven, we thank you for this Lord's Day. We thank you for the Word of God. We thank you for the worship of God. We come to you, Father, through the great High Priest, even Jesus Christ our Lord, and hopefully by the power of the Holy Spirit, such that the triune God would be exalted in this place, that you would be lifted on high, that you would be glorified and magnified and worshiped and praised by your people. For certainly, God, you called us out of darkness into marvelous light so that we would proclaim your praises, that we would proclaim your excellencies. So help us on this Sabbath day to do just that as we sing, as we pray, as we look to Holy Scripture. We pray now that you would forgive us for all of our sins and our unrighteousness. As we look at your holiness, as we look at your law, we see how far short we have fallen. And yet we are thankful and we praise you that there is a fountain open for sin and uncleanness. We pray that even now you would wash us and purify us. And for any and all who have come here that are strangers to that fountain, strangers to the gospel of our Lord Jesus, we pray that your spirit would be at work, that you would bring conviction for sin and show sinners the Lord Christ and his ability to save to the uttermost. Please send forth your Holy Spirit now and be glorified and magnified, we pray. We ask through Jesus Christ, Amen. As I said, this is a particularly packed parable and it's going to be helpful for us, as I mentioned, to break it down into two parts. The giving of the parable this morning, verses 33 to 39. and then take up the remaining portion next week, God willing. But remember, the specific context is the Tuesday of Passion Week. Our Lord Jesus enters into Jerusalem triumphantly riding on that foal, the colt or the foal of a donkey, according to the prophecy of Zechariah in chapter 9. He is then praised as the son of David. in Matthew chapter 21 that is on the Monday and then on the Tuesday he curses the fig tree as we see here in Matthew 21 and then he enters into these various disputations with the religious leaders. It is a question concerning his authority. Notice in 21 verses 23 to 27, they ask him, by what authority are you doing these things and who gave you this authority? So what they want to know is who does Jesus think he is? Who does he think he is coming into their temple, turning over their tables and driving out the animals and the money changers? They wonder where he got the chutzpah that he is displaying in this particular situation. So they pin him, they nail him, they ask him, by what authority do you do this? Christ then effectively puts them on the horns of a dilemma by asking about the authority of John the Baptist. They then say, we're not going to answer that. And then Jesus presses them further. He gives that parable of the two sons. And that parable of the two sons indicates that they, the religious leaders, are like the son who says yes to the father. Yes, I'll obey your law, but they don't do it. The tax collectors and the harlots, they're like that son that says, no, I'm not going to do it. But then he repents and he goes and he does it. And Jesus brings this to bear upon them in verse 31. Assuredly, I say to you, the tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom of God before you. John came in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him. The tax collectors and the harlots, they however believed him, and they thus are entering the kingdom of heaven, and you yourselves are not. And so that brings us to this parable of the vineyard. He says, here, another parable. He will tell one more in chapter 22, and then there will be a series of questions and answers, four of them, to summarize or to finish this particular time of his controversy with the religious leaders. Now we're going to spend some time this morning looking at various texts, because I want you to see how important this context is to the proper understanding of Matthew 24. In the next few chapters, the interpretation is pretty straightforward. Everybody pretty much agrees, but when we get to the Olivet Discourse, There's a lot of difference of opinion on how we are to interpret Matthew 24. I think it's absolutely crucial that if we understand that in Matthew 24 the Lord Jesus is speaking prophetically on the Tuesday night, we ought to understand what went on on the Tuesday day to set it in its proper context and to see just what Christ is referring to when he speaks concerning the destruction, of the temple in Matthew 24. Is he speaking about the temple that then stood or is he speaking about some future rebuilt temple? I will argue that he is talking about the temple that then stood because these religious leaders representing the nation of Israel had filled up the measure of their guilt and the wrath of God Most High was going to come upon them in A.D. 70. So these chapters leading up to the Olivet Discourse, it is imperative that we understand what's happening. So as we look at the giving of the parable this morning, we'll consider two things. First, the background, and secondly, the details. Notice in the first place, he says, here another parable, there was a certain landowner who planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it, dug a wine press in it and built a tower. Now Christ has already used this parable or this idea of a vineyard. He's done it in Matthew chapter 20 and he did it here in Matthew 21 with the parable of the two sons. The man was a landowner, he had a vineyard and he tells his two sons to go out and work. But behind that are several things in the Old Testament. Most likely, Psalm 80, verses 6 to 16, where God the Lord brings Israel out of Egypt and He plants her as a vine. Jeremiah 2, in verse 21, the Lord God, through Jeremiah, refers to the nation of Israel as a vineyard. But specifically, Isaiah the prophet, chapter 5, and you can turn there, because it's important that we see Christ is charged Christ is stated as being a prophet, and Christ, consistent with the prophets before him, is essentially doing the same things that they did in the Old Covenant. Notice in Isaiah chapter 5, beginning in verse 1, Now let me sing to my well-beloved a song of my beloved regarding his vineyard. My well-beloved has a vineyard on a very fruitful hill. He dug it up and cleared out its stones and planted it with the choicest vine. He built a tower in its midst and also made a wine press in it. So he expected it to bring forth good grapes, but it brought forth wild grapes. And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah, judge, please, between me and my vineyard. What more could have been done to my vineyard that I have not done in it? Why then, when I expected it to bring forth good grapes, did it bring forth wild grapes? And now please tell me, tell me, you, what I will do to my vineyard. I will take away its hedge, and it shall be burned, and break down its wall, and it shall be trampled down. I will lay it waste, it shall not be pruned or dug. But there shall come up briars and thorns. I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain on it." Now note the interpretation that God through the prophet gives. Verse 7. For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are his pleasant plant. He looked for justice, but behold, oppression, for righteousness, but behold, a cry for help." Sounds very much like what Jesus is doing here in our parable of the vineyard. He has come to condemn national Israel, specifically the religious leaders in Israel, and as a result of their covenant unfaithfulness, their breaking of God's ordinances to them, they will be judged as a result of that. That is precisely the context in Matthew 21 as well. Notice in Isaiah, the benefits given by God, verses 1, 2, and 4. The sinfulness of Israel, verses 2, 4, and 7. the judgment promised by God in verses 5 and 6, and then the application, as I've said, in verse 7. So I hope that you see this particular background. When we get to verse 45, these religious leaders understood that Jesus spoke these parables about them. And it's important that we as well understand that Jesus spoke these parables about them because it will be helpful for us when we get to all of it to try and understand what Christ is speaking about. Now let's get to the details of our parable in Matthew 21 verses 33 to 39. The identification of the parties involved. The landowner is God the Father. The vineyard is Israel and the kingdom of God. The reason why is that Israel was the localized dwelling of God's kingdom on earth. There's an instance where Solomon sits upon the throne of Yahweh. David is that Messiah. David is that Davidic king that rules over the expression of God's kingdom on earth. So Israel slash kingdom of God. We see that in verse 43. Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. The vinedressers or the tenants are the leadership of Israel. including the priests. The servants of the landowner are the prophets of God, and obviously the son of the landowner, everybody should get this one right, it's, yes, you guessed it, the Lord Jesus Christ. So this is his purpose here. They have rejected the prophets, including John the Baptist. They are rejecting the Lord Jesus Christ. They will exclude him from the city and execute him outside of the city. And Jesus, what he has announced prophetically in chapter 16, 17 and 20, he now underscores by way of parable to the very men that are going to execute him. Now notice specifically the setting of the parable. The landowner planted a vineyard, just like what we see in Isaiah chapter 5 as well. The landowner protected the vineyard. That's the purpose here. There was a certain landowner who planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it, dug a wine press in it, and built a tower. Why would you do those things? To keep animals out? To keep foreign intruders out? To keep persons away from your vineyard? that aren't supposed to be there. We see in this God's protection over Israel. We see God's provision over Israel, such that in the prophet Isaiah, God says, what more could I have done in order to benefit these people? He's not talking about ability, he is demonstrating his benevolence. I gave them everything. I endowed them with blessings from on high. I gave them mercy after mercy after mercy, and yet I look for justice, I look for righteousness, I look for goodness in the land, but what do I find? Oppression and robbery and all manner of evil. So we see God's providence, God's protection, God's provision, God's benefit over these people. And in the parable it works as well with reference to the economics of the situation. What we find is the landowner has put in a great deal of investment, right? It ain't cheap to protect a vineyard. It ain't cheap to build towers. It ain't cheap to dig hedges or dig ditches and put hedging up so that you can keep out intruders. So what does that imply? The landowner has a right and a title to recompense. In other words, he's made a substantial investment such that when he comes looking for repayment or looking for his share, it is perfectly legitimate and perfectly consistent that he does expect these particular things. Now notice he leases this out to vinedressers or to tenants. And essentially what these men would do, would they farm a piece of property that the owner owned, and from their fruit they would pay him a portion of it. And when it says that he went into a far country, we need to understand this is a parable. God didn't leave the universe. God didn't go hang out on Pluto while, you know, Israel and the old covenant people just sort of did their thing on earth. It's speaking in the manner of men. It is a parable designed to instruct us something. And in this particular instance, the stress lies upon God's long suffering, God's patience. God's kindness, God's goodness. Chrysostom says, and went into a far country. That is, he bore long with them, not always bringing the punishments close upon their sins, for by his going into a far country, he means his great long suffering. That's what's in view here. Not that God left the world, left the universe, and just sort of did his own thing while Israel did their thing. No, it's a convention. It's a matter. It's a literary matter by which, in this parable, it instructs us concerning God's way toward them. Now notice, the Lord God, the landowner of the vineyard, wants his fruit. And we see that Israel rejects the prophets and Israel rejects the Messiah. Note, the landowner sent his servants to collect the fruit or the payment. And this is probably after four years. Again, underscoring the great amount of patience involved in this whole transaction. It took several years for vines to grow and to start to yield grapes. I think some of you out there have grown grapes and you could probably confirm that. I'm looking for my grape growing brothers. It takes a while. Doesn't happen overnight. It's not like tomatoes. I mean, when we lived in Palmdale, as hot as it was, we had tomatoes coming out of our ears. They were, you know, easy to grow, quick, and, I mean, pretty severe weather conditions, and yet we always seemed to have a lot of tomatoes. Not so with vineyards. Now notice, the landowner sent his servants to collect the fruit or payment, just like in the prophet Isaiah. He expected it to bring forth good grapes, but it brought forth wild grapes. Verse 4 of Isaiah 5, Why then, when I expected it to bring forth good grapes, did it bring forth wild? Verse 7, He looked for justice, but behold, oppression, for righteousness, but behold, a cry for help. Same sort of thing going on in this passage. Verse 34, Now when vintage time drew near, He sent His servants to the vinedressers, that they might receive its fruit. You see, it's legit that God who has called his people to himself, carved out a land for them, given them every blessing, put them in the land of Canaan, protected them in various and sundry ways, it is legit for him to expect fruit. In Matthew's Gospel, we see the same sort of emphasis upon fruit necessary. When the Baptist is out preaching in the wilderness, what does he say to the persons who come? He says, bear fruit consistent with repentance. We see this in Matthew 7 in the Sermon on the Mount. The Lord Jesus emphasizes the necessity of fruit. We see it in the parables of the kingdom. The Lord Jesus emphasizes the necessity of fruit. There is a corollary that we ought to appreciate at this particular juncture. As the New Covenant people of God, He still demands fruit. When you get to the book of Revelation, chapters 2 and 3, the Lord Jesus comes to the churches, and if they are not fruit-bearing bodies, He threatens to withdraw the lampstand from their midst. What's the implication? What should the Church of Jesus Christ learn from a passage like this? It's not enough for us to be deadbeats. It's not enough for us just to occupy a space on a Sunday morning or a Sunday evening. It is not enough for us to make some sort of a profession but be dead inside. Brethren, if the Lord God Almighty has called us to Himself by sovereign grace and has cleansed us in the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ, it is our privilege, it is our joy, it is our delight to bear fruit to Him, to yield ourselves unto Him. This is what Paul says in Romans chapter 12. We are to present our bodies. We are to present our bodies as living sacrifices unto the Lord. I was just thinking about this this morning with reference to the Lord's Day. Praise God He doesn't say, Lord's weak. As abysmal as we are separating one day out of seven for Him, imagine if He demanded a week out of the month. We'd be beside ourselves. I mean, it's tough for us to render obedience to Him on the Lord's day, without our minds wandering, without our thoughts going, without our desires to be elsewhere. Imagine Lord's weak. Imagine the Lord's month, one month out of 12, you give to Him fully and wholly. How would it be with us? Would we be like, wow, I don't know what to do. I just don't know what I'm going to do. It's going to be a real difficulty. Brethren, it is our privilege as the people of God Most High to yield fruit, to bear fruit, to shine as lights in a crooked and perverse generation, to hold forth the word of truth, to be a faithful body, not to be like those Laodiceans that were neither hot nor cold. that were lukewarm and such that the Lord Jesus is going to spew them out of his mouth. So much of the professing church today seems to be that way, lukewarm. And when Jesus speaks that way to the Laodiceans, he doesn't mean, I want you to be a cold-hearted atheist. No, hot things in your mouth are good, cold things in your mouth are good. It's the lukewarm that is wretched. And that's why he threatens to spit them from his mouth, just like Old Covenant Israel was threatened that the land would vomit them out. And that is precisely what happens. You see, it's legit, it's right, it's good that the landowner requests fruit. Now notice what happens. Jesus has already spoken to the lack of fruit in Israel. He spoke to this on Tuesday morning by cursing the fig tree. He found no fruit upon it, so he curses the fig tree and he says, no fruit will ever grow on you again. So he's affirmed that they are indeed fruitless, but he wants to demonstrate or illustrate here that this is nothing new. So the landowner sent his servants, these are the old covenant prophets, including John the Baptist, to them that they might receive its fruit. Notice in verse 35, and the vinedressers took his servants. They beat one, killed one, and stoned another. It's terrible, isn't it? I mean, we just read through this, well, yeah, you know, we're used to that. Let's just look at a few applications of this in the lives of God's people. 1 Kings chapter 22. First Kings chapter 22, that instance where Ahab wants Jehoshaphat to join him in battle against Syria. Syria had possessed Ramoth Gilead and Ahab says, we own Ramoth Gilead but we don't want to go depossess it from the Syrians all on our own. So he marshals the assistance of Jehoshaphat, the southern king. Josh, a fat, being a southern king, says, shouldn't we hear from the prophets before we march into battle? So Ahab says, of course, I have many court prophets. They'll come up and they'll tell us what we ought to do. And of course, all these prophets come and they lie. Yeah, go to battle, you'll win. Yeah, go to battle, you'll do great. Yeah, go to battle, you'll do fine. Then the question is asked, is there no other prophet? Yeah, there's one prophet, Ahab says. His name is Micaiah, but I don't like him because he doesn't tell me what I want to hear. Boy, isn't Ahab typical of the church today? I don't like him because he doesn't tell me what I want to hear. We like preachers who tell us what we want to hear. We don't want preachers who tell us the truth. We want preachers to make us feel happy and feel good and feel, you know, best about ourselves. We don't want preachers to tell us that God is angry with the wicked every day and if you don't repent, you're gonna go to hell. We don't like those kind. Micaiah was one of those kind. He stands before Ahab, the question is asked, and Micaiah with tongue firmly planted in cheek says, yeah, go to battle, you'll be peaceful. Go to battle, you'll be victorious. Ahab knew that he was inserting tongue in cheek because he didn't always say, those sorts of things concerning Ahab. So Micaiah tells him the truth. You're going to lose. You're going to go into battle and you're going to lose. You're going to be toast, which intriguingly is precisely what happens. Now notice in verse 24. verse Kings 22 verse 24. Now, Zedekiah the son of Canaanah went near and struck Micaiah on the cheek and said, which way did the Spirit from the Lord go from me to speak to you? He struck him on the face. Why? Because he told him the truth. This happens to Jeremiah the prophet in Jeremiah chapter 20 verses 1 and 2. Again, you can turn there. It's good for us to be aware that what our Lord Jesus is doing is bringing judgment to bear upon a people of whom God bore long with and sent prophets to in order to call them to the right path in obedience and in fruitfulness. Notice in Jeremiah 20 verse 1, Now Pasher, the son of Emer, the priest who is also chief governor in the house of the Lord, heard that Jeremiah prophesied these things. And Pashur struck Jeremiah the prophet and put him in the stocks that were in the high gate of Benjamin which was by the house of the Lord." When you read Jeremiah the prophet, do you think he's a man that should be struck in the face? No, of course you do not. It says they killed the prophets. Jesus says they killed the prophets. Remember that massacre of prophets under Jezebel, Ahab's wife. What a happy couple they were, huh? What would you give them for a wedding gift? Machetes? Poison? Guns, if they're available? I mean, Ahab and Jezebel, what a combo. What a power couple. They'd be looked at today as just that, a power couple. Yeah, powerful and exterminating the people of God. 1 Kings chapter 18, verses 4 and 13, refers to the massacre of the prophets through Jezebel, the wife of Ahab. as well in the prophet Jeremiah in chapter 26. Uriah, the prophet, is executed. And interesting, when we look at Jeremiah, it is in a similar context with our Lord's ministry. Our Lord is preaching in the temple confines. He's going to prophesy against that temple, very specifically, and that is what Jeremiah is doing additionally. It's a difference in terms of years, but it's the same emphasis. Jeremiah is prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple via Babylon through Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians. Jesus is doing the exact same thing, but with reference to the Roman assault upon Israel. Notice in Jeremiah 26, verse 20, now there was also a man who prophesied in the name of the Lord, Uriah the son of Shemaiah of Kirjath-Jerim who prophesied against this city and against this land according to all the words of Jeremiah. And when Jehoiachin the king with all his mighty men and all the princes heard his words the king sought to put him to death. But when Uriah heard it he was afraid and fled and went to Egypt. Then Jehoiachin the king sent men to Egypt El Nathan, the son of Achbor, and other men who went with him to Egypt. And they brought Uriah from Egypt and brought him to Jehoiakim the king, who killed him with the sword and cast his dead body into the graves of the common people." And then Jesus speaks of stoning as well. You can turn to 2 Chronicles chapter 24 to see an instance of this. 2 Chronicles chapter 24. I think this helps us understand what Jesus means in chapter 23 of Matthew when he says the blood from Abel to Zechariah. Zechariah is treated here, his stoning death, in 2 Chronicles 24. Do you know what Jesus is saying when he says from Abel to Zechariah? Now in English it works out nicely, it's A to Z. But he's speaking about the entirety of the Hebrew canon. The Hebrew order of the biblical books begins with Genesis and ends with 2 Chronicles. So when Jesus says, from Abel to Zechariah, he is saying, in essence, every good man that the Lord and his four barons sent to you, instead of embracing him, instead of listening to him, instead of repenting because of your sinfulness, you have persecuted. You have destroyed. And in Zechariah's case, you have pummeled to death with stones, which is to add insult to injury. Notice 2 Chronicles 24 verse 20, Then the Spirit of God came upon Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, the priest, who stood above the people and said to them, Thus says God, Why do you transgress the commandments of the Lord, so that you cannot prosper? Because you have forsaken the Lord, He also has forsaken you. So they conspired against Him, and at the command of the king, they stoned Him with stones in the court of the house of the Lord. Thus, Joash the king did not remember the kindness which Jehoiada, his father, had done to him, but killed his son. And as he died, he said, the Lord look on it and repay." Chamberlain points out, with reference to this idea of stoning, as killing is more severe than beating, so is stoning more severe than killing. For stoning carries connotations of execution on the grounds of religious apostasy. So essentially what Jesus is saying is that these wicked tenants accused these prophets of false prophecy and then actually killed them and stoned them in the case of Zechariah. And therefore it implies disgrace as well as death. So this first round that the Lord God sends to the nation of Israel They beat him, they kill him, and they stone him, or stone them. So what is the Lord's response? What's the landowner do? Now it's precisely here where the parable takes a decisive change in terms of reality. This is an unreal scenario, isn't it? The landowner wouldn't send more prophets. The landowner would send the Roman army. The landowner wouldn't then send his son. He would have already sent the Roman army. But remember, it's a parable. And at times, parables exaggerate particular things in order to highlight something that is true. And in this case, the truth is that God is long-suffering. God is patient. It never ceases to amaze me to talk to persons who have a problem with the Old Testament. They say, wow, it's full of wrath and judgment and fury. No, it isn't. It is an amazingly patient document. If you would have been God for 30 seconds and your subjects were as disloyal to you as you are to Him, you would have wiped them out. But not God. He bears long. He is truly long-suffering with the nation of Israel. The fact that he sends more prophets, and the fact that he then sends the son of his love. Now, before you start to think, this only has to do with the religious leaders in the first century. No, there's application to be made here. All of you have been subjects of God's patience. Each and every one of you in this room have been subjects of God's patience. How do I know that? Because you're not currently in hell. That's how I know that. You have all benefited from the patience of God. And you know what Paul says? That the patience of God is designed to promote in you? It is designed to promote repentance. You know how I know God is patient? You're not in hell. You know how else I know God is patient? Because you're still not in hell. You are to use that patience or to see that goodness of God as a provocation, if you will, to repent. The conclusion ought to be God has not dealt with me as he ought. God has not treated me as he ought. God has not rewarded me as he ought. Therefore, I'm going to flee to him and seek further mercy and seek further grace. And I'm going to be so bold as on the warrant of Holy Scripture to plead with him that he cleanses me in the blood of Jesus Christ. It's the patience, it's the long-suffering, it's the goodness of God that ought to lead you to repentance. Well, the same was true in Israel's case. God sends a delegation of prophets. They beat them, they kill them, they stone them. So what does God the landowner do? He sends more to them. And it says they did likewise to these prophets. A few more passages because I want us to understand this particular emphasis. There are other Old Testament references to Israel's rejection of the prophets. 2 Chronicles chapter 36. 2 Chronicles chapter 36, again a light context with what our Lord Jesus is going through. 2 Chronicles 36 is just prior to the fall of Jerusalem to Babylon in the 6th century B.C. And note one of the reasons for that fall. Note one of the reasons for God's cutting off the covenant people. Notice in 2 Chronicles 36, 15, and the Lord God of their fathers sent warnings to them by his messengers, rising up early and sending them because he had compassion on his people and on his dwelling place. Do you see that? Do you see how it is such an affront to a holy God when He pours out compassion? When He pours forth mercy? When He demonstrates kindness? When He exercises long-suffering? When He doesn't immediately cast you off into hell? If instead of repentance, you harden your heart, you harden your neck, you continue to be unfruitful, you continue to raise your fist at Him, Notice verse 16, but they mocked the messengers of God, despised his words, and scoffed at his prophets until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, till there was no remedy. That's another thing I ought to remind you of. God is patient. God is full of long-suffering. Romans 2.4, that long-suffering ought to lead you to repentance, but there is a day coming. when that patience will stop. It happened in the 6th century when Babylon came via Nebuchadnezzar to destroy the city. You see, God is patient with Israel. God is patient with Judah. God raises up early and sends messengers to them because he's compassionate upon his people. But they mocked the messengers of God, despised his words, scoffed at his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, until there was no remedy. You see, that patience ultimately ended. And the same thing is true in our Lord's teaching. Jesus is talking about that particular group of men. Jesus is talking about those religious leaders. They perceive that he is speaking about them. And then Jesus prophesies the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Guess what happened in A.D. 70? Do you know that? Jerusalem was destroyed. Jesus says in Luke 21, when you see Jerusalem surrounded by her enemies, know that her desolation is near. Why do you think Jesus, in terms of warnings in the Olivet Discourse, is warning people in Judah? These aren't cosmic judgments! What sort of a thing would that be if in Matthew 24 it's speaking to the physical second coming of our Lord Jesus? What does it matter where you are? What does it matter if you're giving suck to children? What does it matter if it's the Sabbath day? If that Matthew 24 is speaking to the second coming of our Lord Jesus when he judges all things and ushers in the eternal state, it really makes no sense. But if it's a localized judgment that affects the nation of Israel, specifically Judah, for their covenant unfaithfulness to the Lord God, then a warning about believers fleeing to the mountains of Judea makes perfect sense. And interestingly enough, when Titus and the armies converged upon Jerusalem, they backed off for a time. Guess what the persons who listened to Matthew 24 and remembered the words of the Lord Jesus did? They ran. They went to Pella. They chilled out until the destruction was over because their Lord, in his grace and in his mercy, warned them. See brethren, Christ is a prophet and Christ is speaking to a covenantally unfaithful people. And Christ is bringing judgment to bear upon them. That's the context, that's the issue, that's what we need to appreciate. There is a like statement in Nehemiah 9.26. There is a like statement in Jeremiah 7, 25 to 27, but I want to look quickly at some New Testament references to see indeed that this is Israel's lot, or had been Israel's lot, in God's dealing with them. Luke 13, verses 33 to 35. Luke 13, 33. Nevertheless, I must journey today, tomorrow, and the day following For it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem. I'll tell you one better, brethren. Do you know that city that is guilty in the book of Revelation? What is their chief aspect of guilt? It's blood guilt. They were a great city, as we saw in the reading in Revelation 17, that was glutted on the blood of the martyrs. You see Matthew in Matthew 24, Luke in Luke 21, Mark in Mark 13, give us the little apocalypse. John gives us the large apocalypse. The subject matter is precisely the same. It is the fall of Jerusalem because of her unfaithfulness to the living God, because the Lord bore long with Israel, because the Lord sent messengers to Israel, and instead of receiving them, instead of repenting, instead of forsaking, they beat one, they killed one, and they stoned one. And then they would have the gall to see the sun, the heir himself, and they would seize him and take him outside of the city and they would execute him. They had indeed filled up the wrath to the uttermost. And that's what the New Testament teaches us. That's what the scriptures declare. Notice in Acts 7 at verse 52. Again, another key passage because Stephen is on trial for the same thing that Jesus was and that Jeremiah was. Speaking about the temple, look at Acts 6, specifically in verse 13. They also set up false witnesses who said, this man does not cease to speak blasphemous words against this holy place and the law. For we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place. You see, this isn't some whack job interpretation. This is what the church believed. They heard the Olivet Discourse. They acted upon the Olivet Discourse. And now Stephen is being brought up on these charges that he said that Jesus was going to destroy this place. What place? The temple. Notice in 1 Thessalonians, chapter 2. 1 Thessalonians, chapter 2, verses 14 to 15. I told my wife this morning, thank you for having our kids over this afternoon because I might die in surgery. You go, wow, I had just that 1% mindset. You know, they always give you this margin of when, you know, everybody's successful when you go through this surgery, but there is this minuscule margin. You know, I'm the guy that goes and buys the phone off the shelf, and there's a hundred of them, and I get the one that doesn't work. You know, it's just kind of the thought, you know, I gotta make sure that, you know, it's nice to have all our kids over for lunch today if something should go wrong, and they, instead of removing the hip bone, put it through my chest or something, then it would have been good to have seen my children. So I'm rehearsing some of this ground so that subsequent preachers who take over after me and keep on in Matthew 24, this groundwork will be laid. Because brethren, what it touches on is the doctrine of the end times. And there's a lot of confusion about the end times. There's a lot of confusion about the beast, about the Antichrist, about the man of sin. There's a lot of confusion about how we understand what's going to happen when Jesus returns. And I think a mass of that confusion comes from failing to reflect upon Jesus' teaching. I realize they'll say the same thing concerning me, but could it be clearer what Jesus is doing here? He's tracing the history of Israel. He's giving us biblical theology. He's going to bring that home after chapter 22 in chapter 23 with a series of woes to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites. He's going to tell them that you have filled up the measure of God's wrath. And then he leaves Jerusalem, he goes back to Bethany, he sits on the Olivet, and he gives the prophecy concerning the destruction of the temple. Why in the world would we conclude he's not talking about that temple? Why in the world would we possibly conclude that maybe that temple but another future temple? There is no future temple. There is no rebuilt future temple in Palestine. The temple of God is Christ. It is God, or it is Christ wherein God and sinners dwell together in blessed communion. And in fellowship, Jesus is the reason that the temple existed. And now that Jesus is here, we don't have to go about building a temple, reinstituting animal sacrifices, going through those old covenant motions. The old covenant has passed away. Isn't that what Hebrews 7, 8, and 10 are all about? Isn't that the emphasis of the apostle there in Hebrews? We have a better covenant built on better promises that affords a better hope. Why? Because we have Jesus, the surety of a better covenant. We don't look to rebuild temples. We look to worship our God through the Lord Jesus, by the Holy Spirit, in what we are supposed to do. And what we are supposed to do is gather together in churches, just like we're doing this morning. So, if I drop dead cam and you keep going, hopefully this will be somewhat helpful. Notice in 1 Thessalonians 2.4, For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God, which are in Judea in Christ Jesus. For you also suffered the same things from your own countrymen, just as they did from the Judeans, who killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us, and they do not please God and are contrary to all men. Notice, "...forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, so as always to fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the uttermost." What is he talking about? He's talking about when you see Jerusalem surrounded by its enemies, then you'll know that its desolation is near. These men knew what was coming. These men understood the Olivet Discourse, and these men acted consistently with that. But most powerfully is in the immediate context, in Matthew 23. I've alluded to that. God willing, we will see it someday. But in Matthew 23, essentially we see Jesus indict them for their hypocrisy. And note in verse 30 of Matthew 23, And you say, If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Therefore you are witnesses against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. We wouldn't have murdered them, but you're the sons of the men who murdered the prophets. And you too are guilty. Verse 32, fill up then the measure of your father's guilt. Serpent, broods of vipers, how can you escape the condemnation of hell? Therefore indeed I send you prophets, wise men and scribes. Some of them you will kill and crucify and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from city to city. He's talking to the Jewish leaders. In Matthew 10, when he gives his disciples their instructions for a preaching mission, he says, you will be delivered up in the synagogues. Who was the first chief persecutor of the church? It wasn't Rome. It was unbelieving Israel. Now, if you think that sounds anti-Semitic or the New Testament reflects an anti-Semitism, it doesn't. Because after AD 70, the Jewish nation went into the ranks of all other nations. The emphasis now is to preach the gospel to Jews, to tell them to repent, to believe on the Lord Jesus, not assure them that they've got a geopolitical future because of old covenant prophecy. No, those old covenant prophecies are fulfilled in and by Christ. And if there is earthly application, it is in the church. Now, this is where the dispensationalist goes nuts, but I think the scriptures validate this interpretation. Notice, Jesus then says, verse 35, that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah. Again, I've already rehearsed this. A to Z in English, but a whole Old Testament canon, right? Genesis to 2 Chronicles. That's what Abel and Zechariah represent. Genesis and Zechariah. I'm sorry, 2 Chronicles. Son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar, assuredly, I say to you, all these things will come upon some generation that exists in the future. No, this generation. Some say, well, Matthew doesn't always use it that way. Yes, he does. Every time Matthew uses this generation, it means, get this, this generation. The generation to whom Jesus speaks, not the generation that is present when these things come to pass. No, this generation. He's just spent a whole day disputing with them. He just spent part of a day pronouncing woes upon them. He just says that you have filled up the measure of guilt. And now he's going to talk about wrath coming on a future generation? It doesn't make any sense. He is talking about this generation. Notice, verse 37, O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her. How often I wanted to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing. See, your house is left to you desolate, for I say to you, you shall see me no more till you say, blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. So back to 21, I hope that you see in this particular instance what we have is the rejection of the prophets and then the father, the landowner says in verse 37, then last of all he sent his son to them saying they will respect my son. Again it's a parable speaking in the manner of men. God the Father knew absolutely positively that they would not respect his son. but it is a parable spoken to man in the manner of man to instruct us concerning what Jesus is speaking to. Notice, the landowner's assumption, they will respect my son. Notice as well, Jesus' self-identification. Jesus refers to himself as the son of the landowner of the vineyard. Now, these men didn't have to be reminded to go back to Isaiah 5 to see that it was Yahweh who owned this particular vineyard. These men understood all too well who owned the vineyard of Israel. These men understood all too well who owned the kingdom of God. And Christ identifies himself as the son of Yahweh. Notice the expectation concerning the son. They will respect my son. Gil says, the son of God is to be reverenced equally as his father, since he is in nature and glory equal to him. And it is the will of his father he should be so reverenced as he is by the angels in heaven and by the saints both in heaven and in earth. He said, but did these husband men reverence him? No. They despised and rejected him. They reproached and traduced him as the vilest of men and used him in the most cruel and barbarous manner. So the father, the landowner, last of all, he sent his son to them saying, they will respect my son. Note their response in verse 38. But they said, or when the vinedresser saw the son, they said among themselves, this is the heir. Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance. So they took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. Now, it is truly an intriguing thing that these men understood that he was talking about himself, about them. Verse 45. And then in verse 46, they fulfill this parable. See the folly of sin and that it renders persons foolish. They're fulfilling the very thing that he just taught them. They wanted to lay hands on him. That's Caesar, isn't it? But they feared the multitude because the multitude reckoned that he was a prophet. Absolutely amazing. The very parable that Jesus is teaching them is fulfilled by them right before our eyes. Instead of repenting, instead of bowing, instead of singing with the multitudes and the infants, Hosanna to the son of David, they want to seize him, they want to eject him from their city, and they want to crucify him. That is precisely what is in view. They want to seize the son, they want to kill the son and seize his inheritance. Again, Gil, concluding that they could be rid of him, their nation would be in peace, their temple would stand, and temple worship and service continue. And they remain in their office and authority undisturbed. You see, Jesus was a threat to the status quo in the first century. They can't allow that. They've got to get rid of him. Jeremiah was a threat. We can't allow that. We've got to get rid of him. Micaiah is a threat. We can't allow that. We've got to get rid of him. Uriah, he's a threat. We can't allow that. We've got to get rid of him. That is the history of this people. Now remember, it's not every one of them. There are two sons in the first parable. There is a believing remnant within Israel. It's a beautiful thing. Paul tells us that in Romans 9.6. Not all Israel is Israel. It's not the very nation itself, and it's not ethnicity that's in view. It is faith with reference to our living and true God. Now notice. This is consistent with our Lord's repeated announcements, Matthew 16, 17, and 20, and then they execute their plan. Verse 39, so they took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. That is precisely the order, isn't it? That is precisely what happens in Matthew 27, John 19, and according to Hebrews chapter 13, he is outside the camp. That is where this deed is transacted. D.A. Carson says that the rejection of the Son, verse 39, by the leaders is the final straw that brings divine wrath on them. Davies and Allison say the rejection of Jesus is the climax in the story of rebellion against Israel's God. Don't miss the Christological claims. Yes, Jesus identifies as the son of Yahweh, but he identifies with the prophets. He identifies with those messengers sent from the land owner to call Israel to repentance and faith. And so in their rejection of the Lord Jesus, it is the climax of their rejection of Israel's God. So what do we learn? If you're sitting there saying, wow, that does sound like Old Covenant Israel, you're not alone because the religious leaders perceive that. Look at verse 45. Now, when the chief priests and Pharisees heard his parables, plural, that means the parable of the two sons and the parable of the vineyard, they perceived, they knew that he was speaking of them. So the history of Israel, it's not pretty, is it? If you're a reader of the Old Testament, you have to admit that. How long do they go under a good king where everything's great and they're honoring God and they're glorifying God and everything's just going wonderfully? It's not long, is it? It's one failure after another. Interestingly enough, after the giving of covenants, more often than not, you see dismal failure. Noah comes out of the ark. God covenants with Noah. What's the next scene? Noah drunk and his sons engaged in wickedness. We see this pattern of God's command and failure. We see this pattern of God's command and rebellion. We see this pattern of God's law and the inability of persons to fulfill it. Because one of the functions of the Old Covenant was to point to Christ. was to continually show them that there's one hero in Israel. As great a guy as Samson is, and as much as I love Samson, he was not a perfect man. As much as David is a hero and he's a great man, he wasn't a perfect man. Israel was being tutored by God in the Old Covenant to look unto Jesus. The history of Israel displays that. It demonstrates that. It evidences that throughout. And it is a tragic history. A second lesson that I think we ought to learn, and I touched on this briefly so we'll just touch on it briefly again. The responsibilities associated with covenant membership. You see the Bible is very clear what happens to professors who are without fruit. Professors who do not love, professors who do not worship, professors who do not... I'm not talking about professors that teach at college. I'm talking about those who profess the Christian faith. We're saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. Accompanied by all other graces. In other words, if we're justified freely by His grace, we will embark on the life of sanctification. That's fruit bearing. That's production. That's yielding a harvest. That's demonstrating the fruits of the Spirit. That's living in a manner that is consistent with God and His Word. That is both individually and corporately to please the landowner. Because He saved us for that particular reason. Not so we'd lay around and play indeno and say, isn't it great to be, you know, children of God? No, we're to serve Him. And you read the book of Revelation, chapters 2 and 3, and Jesus does threaten to take the lampstand from among them. What does that mean? It means to close down their churches. Why? Because they're lukewarm. They're neither hot nor cold. They're of no benefit in the city of Laodicea. They're proud, they're arrogant, they think they're rich, they think they have no need, but you don't know. You're blind, you're naked, you're destitute. Yet Jesus, even in that one, in Laodicea, says, repent. Repent. I chasten those whom I love. In the third place, I think you ought to ask yourself, in light of this particular parable of the vineyard, how do you respond to the servants of God? How do you respond to the servants of God? In other words, we can look at Israel and say, wow, that was pretty wretched what Ahab had done to Micaiah. That's pretty wretched what they did to Zechariah. It's pretty bad what they did to those Old Testament prophets. In fact, if you read the book of Hebrews in chapter 11, you see what God's people endured. for their faith in the living and true God. Just look at the ministry of the Son. How did they receive Him? They didn't. They seized Him, they cast Him out of the city, they took Him outside the camp, and there they crucified Him. How do you respond to the servants of God? There's no prophet today, there's no Isaiah that's going to occupy this pulpit, there's no Jeremiah or Zechariah or a Micah or a Haggai or any of those men that are going to fall out of heaven and stand here and preach to you. But with reference to those who actually bring the Word of God through faithful exposition and application, how do you receive it? Is it rejection? Is it, I can't wait for it to be over? Is it, this is miserable and terrible and I can't stand it? Or is it, God in heaven, help me to embrace your word and not to be the bump on the log that I have been, but to get serious about my Christianity and start producing fruit. Because if God is looking for fruit as a gracious and patient landowner, and I'm not producing fruit, and pastors up there are telling me I should produce fruit, God help me! I don't want to be like this. I don't want to be miserable. I don't want to be the sort of person that professes to be an apple tree and you can't find an apple on it. How do you receive the servants of God? How do you receive preaching? How do you kids receive it? Would you be with them in Zechariah's day, picking up stones to throw at him? Would you have laughed as that false prophet smacks Micaiah? Would you have sat idly by while Uriah was being put to death, fetched from Egypt? I mean, he made it to Egypt, let him go. No, can't let him go because he actually said something we don't like. Go fetch him, bring him back here and put him to death. You see, brethren, there's two ways to respond to God's servants. You receive it, and by God's grace act upon it, or you reject it. You continue to despise, you continue to reject. Now, you look more polished, and you look nicer, and you look better than those persons that were chucking rocks at Zechariah, but you may have that self-same rebellion in your heart. You may be throwing rocks in your heart just to silence the man or a parent that happens to be preaching to you the word of the living God. This doesn't just apply in a pulpit. It applies in the living room. Your father, your mother is teaching you the truth of God's word. How do you respond to that? Oh no, I don't need that. Oh no, I got it all figured out. Yeah, you're 12. That's convincing. Or 22, yeah, I'm sure you got it all figured out. You just want to grab them and say, no you don't. You need to listen to what God's Word says. You know, parents, I think we can teach our children something about how we receive preaching by example. If we as parents are snoozing in church, our kids are never going to feel the weight of importance when it comes to hearing in church. We all talk about that. We need to preach the gospel with our words and we need to exemplify a godly life. How are we exemplifying a godly life when it comes to the Lord's Day ethic? How are we exemplifying a godly life when it comes to coming to church? You know, the psalmist said, I was glad when they said to me, let us go to the house of the Lord. If there is a groan in unison on a Sunday morning from so-and-so's house, that's not Davidic. Don't be amazed when your kids at 20 or 25 say, I don't want to go to the house of the Lord. He never taught me that it was something I should want to go to. How do you receive the servants of God? I'm bringing this home, don't worry, we're going in a minute. Which, by the way, we should be able to listen to longer sermons, just kidding. So another thing, fruitfulness means two hour sermons, just kidding. I know now you're raising up in your heart saying, now this is a servant of the Lord we don't particularly like. Let's get him out of here. Just don't stone me. That's what I ask. Note the doctrine of God as conveyed to us in this parable. The goodness of God is seen in his providential separation of and his protection over his people Israel. The goodness of God is seen in the extreme lengths he goes to to provide for them. I already mentioned the prophet Isaiah chapter 5, 4. What more could have been done to my vineyard that I have not done in it? That's not the sort of question that he's asking for actual input. Okay, what more could I have done? If I gave you more towers? If I gave you more? No, no, no, no. It highlights his generosity. It highlights his benevolence. It highlights his goodness to them. Remember when the prophet Nathan indicted David, the king of Israel, And God the Lord thunders against him. He says, I gave you wives, I gave you houses, I gave you possessions. If that was too little, I would have given you more. What does it underscore? The height of David's sin. God the Lord in his goodness had been so benevolent to David, and David went, he committed adultery and he committed murder. That's the vein in which Isaiah 5.4 comes to us. That's what I hope that we'll appreciate. God has been benevolent. God has been good. God has been gracious. What have you done with it? What have you done with it? Sitting here this morning, not in Christ. Flee to Christ. Believe on the Savior. Don't tarry, don't wait, don't stay away, don't continue in rebellion. If God in His infinite grace and mercy has put you under the sound of the gospel in His patient forbearing, then don't slight this or reject it or neglect it, but flee. You know what the answer is to those who see themselves as sinners before a holy God? Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. Isn't that beautiful? Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. Not go out, make a billion dollars and bring that to the front of the altar. No, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. Not go out and perfectly comply and fulfill every bit of God's holy law. One, I know you'll never be able to do that, but two, if you did do that, you still got a whole heap of sin behind you that needs to be dealt with. The answer of the gospel is to believe. If God in His goodness has put you under preaching, if God in His goodness has put you under faithful parenting, if God in His goodness has given you a Christian spouse who gives you that truth or makes it such that you hear that truth, then believe. Don't reject the servants of the Lord. Don't resist Him. Don't say no to Him. That patience and forbearance should lead you to the to repentance. That's what Paul says. Do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and long-suffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance? That is something that I hope you'll think about today. That is something that I hope, if you're an unbeliever, you take home with you. You say, why am I an unbeliever? Why do I continue to resist? Why do I continue to reject? Why do I continue to walk in my sinfulness when a good and patient God has continually provided these signposts pointing me to His beloved Son? And we ought to appreciate, as we close now, the willingness of the beloved Son. The Father sends the Son. The Son goes willingly. The Son knows what He's going to. The Son understands what these persons did to Zechariah, to Micaiah, to Uriah. The Son knows of their intention. And yet, He submits to the Father. He comes into a world that will not only reject Him, but will seize Him and will throw Him up on a cross to crucify Him. But praise be to God. He doesn't stay on the cross. He doesn't stay in the tomb. This is one of the reasons I think Psalm 118 is cited by our Lord Jesus. The stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone. Jesus is speaking to his resurrection and his exaltation in the very passage where he says, they will seize the son, they will take him outside of the city, and they will destroy him. Yeah, but the one you reject is the chief cornerstone. This is the Lord's doing. This is marvelous in our eyes. Well, let us pray. Our Father, we thank you for your word, and we thank you for giving us the truth concerning the history of Israel. If we reflect but a moment on this passage, we see it's our history as well. Several times, so many times, rejecting the servants of God, rejecting the overtures that come through the preaching of the gospel, and in fact, rejecting the Son of God himself. Lord in heaven, I pray that you'd open our ears and our hearts. I pray that you would cause the forbearance, the patience, the goodness of God to provoke sinners in this place to repentance. We ask that you would go with us now, watch over us in the remainder of this day. Bless Mike Kirkpatrick as he preaches tonight. Give us ears to hear the Word of God. And we pray through Christ our Lord. Amen.
