The Cursing of the Fig Tree
Sermons on Matthew
Turn with me in your Bibles to Matthew chapter 21. We continue our exposition of Matthew's gospel. We find ourselves in the section dealing with our Lord's passion. So when Jesus enters into Jerusalem in the triumphal entry in chapter 21 to the point that he dies on the cross, all of that takes place in the space of one week. And we find ourselves specifically on Tuesday of that passion week The triumphal entry took place on Sunday, the cleansing of the temple took place on Monday, and now Jesus is in route from Bethany to Jerusalem on Tuesday in the passage that we're going to consider this morning, specifically verses 18 to 22. But I want to back up and just read the larger context beginning in verse 12. Then Jesus went into the temple of God and drove out all those who bought and sold in the temple. and overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who sold doves. And he said to them, it is written, my house shall be called a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves. Then the blind and the lame came to him in the temple, and he healed them. But when the chief priests and scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying out in the temple and saying, Hosanna to the son of David, they were indignant and said to him, Do you hear what these are saying? And Jesus said to them, yes, have you never read out of the mouth of babes and nursing infants you have perfected praise? Then he left them and went out of the city to Bethany and he lodged there. Now in the morning as he returned to the city, he was hungry. And seeing a fig tree by the road, he came to it and found nothing on it but leaves, and said to it, let no fruit grow on you ever again. Immediately the fig tree withered away. And when the disciples saw it, they marveled, saying, how did the fig tree wither away so soon? So Jesus answered and said to them, assuredly I say to you, if If you have faith and do not doubt, you will not only do what was done to the fig tree, but also if you say to this mountain, be removed and be cast into the sea, it will be done. And whatever things you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive. Amen. Let us pray. Our blessed God and our Holy Father, we thank you for the scriptures of both the Old and New Testaments. We thank you that they are God-breathed and profitable for doctrine for correction, for reproof, for instruction in righteousness. We pray that even now, God, you would guide our thoughts and help us to understand our Lord's meaning in this particular passage. To that end, we pray for the ministry of the Holy Spirit. We pray that he would come in power and that he would be present among us and that you would guide us and lead us. As well, God, we confess our sin and our transgression, those things that darken our understanding. We pray that you would cleanse us in the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. And for any and all who have come here this morning outside of Christ, we pray that today would be the day of salvation. The gospel would come powerfully by the Spirit. that these things would be applied, and that sin would be shown for what it is, that sinners would see the glory and the majesty and the excellence of our Lord Jesus Christ, who laid his life down, sinners to save, and who rose again, and who ascended on high, and sits enthroned at the right hand of God Most High. And Father, we pray that you would be pleased to do this work for your glory, and for your honor, and for your praise. And we ask through Jesus Christ, our Lord, amen. Well, as we saw, Jesus entered into Jerusalem and he did so in accordance with the prophet Zechariah. When he went into Jerusalem on that colt, it was indicative or it was an acted parable. It was symbolic of the reality that what Zechariah had spoken had come to fruition or fulfillment in our Lord Jesus. And remember, after Christ does this, The people cry out, Hosanna to the son of David. And then the people that didn't get it asked, who is this man? They weren't asking, what's his name? But they were asking, what kind of a man is this? Or what nature of the case is this particular man? And so the Galileans said, this is Jesus, the prophet. from Nazareth of Galilee. And then Jesus, like a prophet, goes into the temple and he sees that it had become a place of money. It had become a place of economics. It had become a place of extortion, a den of thieves itself. So he turns the tables over and he drives the money changers out. Again, this is in accordance with the scripture. He acts as a prophet. And then he combats briefly with these men that are indignant against him and then as we saw in verse 17 he departs from them and he went out of the city to Bethany and he lodged there. So Christ departs probably typical or probably an act of judgment. He essentially turns his back upon them and leaves from them. And so, as I said, we pick up on Tuesday morning and it's early in the morning. Jesus is coming back from Bethany to Jerusalem. Remember, it's the Passover feast. That's why Galileans and that's why Israel as a whole is gathered together in the city for that Passover feast. So Jesus, early in the morning, comes back from Bethany and he goes to Jerusalem and he continues to act in a prophetic manner. What he does in this particular section is most significant and most important for what follows during the rest of the day that takes place here in Matthew's Gospel. There's two things essentially going on. First, in verses 18 to 19, we see the cursing of the fig tree. And then in the second place, the lesson concerning believing prayer, verses 20 to 22. So essentially, there's two lessons. that has to do with this fig tree, and then something that has to do with prayer and the disciples. So let's look first of all at the cursing of the fig tree in verses 18 and 19. He is returning to the city, and notice in verse 18 it says he was hungry. Now, this is according to the form of a servant. This is according to his humanity. The Lord Jesus doesn't hunger as God. There's no divine food. There's no divine repast. There's no divine smorgasbord. Jesus is functioning in his capacity as the form of a servant. He is a man. And as a man, he is affected by hunger. As God, he is not affected by hunger. John Gill says, with reference to this statement, that he is hungry, it proves the truth of his human nature, which was, in all respects, like to ours, accepting sin. So early in the morning, he leaves Bethany. We might ask the question, why didn't he get some breakfast from his host family? The Bible doesn't tell us. But he gets back to the city, or he's on his way to the city, and he sees this fig tree. Because he's hungry, He goes over to it. Notice, specifically, in seeing a fig tree by the road. Matthew indicates it was by the road. It didn't belong to somebody in particular. Jesus isn't in viral meaning. Jesus isn't against personal property. Jesus isn't going to come and curse your fig tree. It is by the road. It is on its own. It's a lonely specimen there. But note specifically what the text says, "...and seeing a fig tree by the road, he came to it and found nothing on it but leaves, and said to it..." We must ask the question, what's happening here? Is Jesus anti-fig tree? Is Jesus got a problem with the flora and the fauna on the way to Jerusalem? Does Jesus have a particular ax to grind against this lonely tree? No, he's functioning in the capacity of a prophet. As I said, it's an acted parable. It is symbolized. There is a symbolic meaning that he is ascribing to this particular thing. You see it in the prophet Isaiah. You see it in the prophet Ezekiel. You see it in Hosea. Hosea was commanded to marry a woman of harlotry. Why? Because God is teaching Israel something. Why does Jesus curse this fig tree? Because Jesus is teaching Israel something. And I suggest, or I submit, or I believe that what he is doing is that he is showing the curse that is going to come upon Jerusalem and its temple. There are several reasons why I believe this. This is the book report concerning the commentators as well, but this is what's in view. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he came to it and found nothing on it but leaves and said to it, So we have this fig tree, it's got leaves. When we see a tree with leaves, it gives the evidence of fruit, doesn't it? If we see a tree and it has no leaves, we conclude there are no fruits. I mean, I'm not that agriculturally minded, but I know enough to realize that if it's blank of leaves, it's probably not going to have any fruit. This is an apt description of Jerusalem, isn't it? Don't forget the context. Jesus just cleansed the temple. There are several reasons why I believe, and others with me believe, that what's in view is Jesus' symbolic parable concerning the destruction of Jerusalem and her temple. In the first place, the Old Testament oftentimes referred to the barren fig tree as a sign of God's judgment. It's used positively as well. A tree that is fruitful and a tree that is bearing figs is an evidence of God's mercy and kindness. But there are several statements applied in the scriptures of the Old Testament where a barren fig tree is a mark, a symbol of God's judgment upon a people. In the second place, the emphasis in Matthew's gospel on Israel's unfaithfulness. Brethren, we've been at this for a couple of years now, and one thing we ought to appreciate is that the people to whom Jesus came did not receive Him. They rejected Him. They were fruitless. They had the leaves of a temple, they had the leaves of a priesthood, they had the leaves of a sacrificial system, but they didn't have the fruit of vital religion. They were a fruitless people. In the third place, in Luke's gospel, Jesus teaches a particular parable that uses the same symbol. In Luke 13, 6, he also spoke this parable. A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard, and he came seeking fruit on it. and found none. Then he said to the keeper of his vineyard, Look, for three years I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree and I find none. Cut it down. Why does it use up the ground? But he answered and said to him, Sir, let it alone this year also until I dig around it and fertilize it. And if it bears fruit, well, but if not, after that you can cut it down. As well, fourthly, why do we think that this is a reference to Israel, generically, Jerusalem specifically, and the Temple? The immediate context. He's already said he's just cleansed the temple the day before. He has shown his displeasure. He has shown his disfavor. I mean, when he's turning those tables and he's driving money changers out, is that a sign that he's happy, that he's thrilled, that he's content, that he is delighted in the fact that the people of Israel are using the temple for the reason for which it was given? No. He is angry. He is not prissy Jesus. He is not effeminate Jesus. He is a man that is consumed with the zeal of his father, and he drives these persons out. But as well, in the immediate context in Matthew 21, notice specifically in verses 33 and following, Jesus uses another symbol concerning Israel, That of a vineyard. This right out of the prophet Isaiah. Isaiah chapter 5. The parable of the wicked vine dressers. And note what the conclusion is concerning this particular parable. Verse 43. Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. He's talking to the religious leadership of Israel. He says the kingdom of God is being taken from you. It's being given to a nation that's bearing the fruits of it. Who is that nation? Peter tells us. The church of Jesus Christ. We are a holy nation. We are the fulfillment in terms of God's promises with reference to His people. Because of Jesus, the Israel of God, He unites Jews and Gentiles as the Israel of God so that we may glorify and honor Him forever. And then another significant piece of evidence that confirms the interpretation that the fig tree specifically represents Jerusalem and the Temple is the Olivet Discourse. See, we read our Bibles and we preach through our Bibles and it takes a great deal of time. Do you know what Jesus does on Tuesday morning? He curses the fig tree. You know how he ends Tuesday when he goes back to Bethany? He gives the Olivet Discourse. What is the focus of the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24? It is the destruction of the temple. Jesus is telling the disciples. They come out of the temple complex. The disciples say, wow, isn't this a beautiful thing? And Jesus says, assuredly, I say to you, not one stone that you see here is going to remain. All of these things are going to crumble. They get over to Bethany. They go up to the Mount of Olives. And Jesus, in prophetic manner, is then asked, tell us about this, Lord. So he describes in vivid detail the destruction of the temple. Now, there are several different interpretations of Matthew 24 to be sure, but I hope that every one of them confirms the reality that at least in some measure, the temple standing in Jerusalem is what Jesus is talking about. That's the particular emphasis of Christ in Matthew 24. I just want to summarize these lines of evidence by reading a good quote from J.C. Ryle. Now typically when I work through sections of scripture, I do rely on several commentators. And that's not to stand up here and say, wow, aren't I great? I read a lot of commentators. Brethren, you shouldn't want novel preaching. You shouldn't want new things. You shouldn't want departures from the historic Christian faith. And when we quote, whether it's me or Pastor Cam, it is showing that preaching and exposition does not happen as a private exercise. It is not a cultic expression of one man to his minions, but it's done ecclesiastically, not only in the context of a local church, but in the context of the Catholic Church. We are connected to these brethren in the same and common end. That's why we quote. It's to show this isn't something I hatched in my office this week. But of all the men that I read, and again, most of them agree, two exceptions. Walvert, a dispensationalist, says, I didn't read him, somebody that I read referenced him. Walvert, a dispensationalist, says, the fig tree doesn't represent Jerusalem or the temple. I understand what drives that. Because Jesus' words here are final. No fruit will ever grow on you again. I don't know how you could be a dispensationalist in light of Jesus' statement in this particular passage. D.A. Carson, as well, is a bit unwilling to say that it deals specifically with Jerusalem and its temple. He says it does, but just the hypocrites within Jerusalem and Israel. John MacArthur, a dispensationalist, says it represents Israel. It represents Jerusalem and the temple. Now, I think, again, he's going to have some inconsistencies because Jesus says concerning the tree that no fruit will ever grow on you again. Not until the millennial kingdom, not until after the rapture, not until God's prophetic clock starts. He says never again. As a body politic, as the old covenant people. Matthew 21, Jesus' words concerning this fig tree. Puts the death knell, as far as I'm concerned, to the separate Jew-Gentile people group. No, there is one people group. It is the Church of the Lord Jesus, and this is what the Old Testament always was driving toward. The temple wasn't the end. Jesus is the end. The temple stood and existed to point us to Christ. Now that Christ is here, we don't rebuild temples just so they can be destroyed. We don't redo things just so they can fall into this prophetic narrative. What was done was done by Christ at the right hand of his father via the Roman armies in AD 70. And the Jews went into the ranks of every other people group, every other nation. God's favor is upon the Israel of God, which is Christ, and in Him all the elect, in Him all believers from all ages. We are the Israel of God, according to Paul in Galatians 6.16. It's really beautiful. We don't need to cut up and carve up biblical prophecy. We need to understand Old Testament prophecy finds its fruition and fulfillment in the person and in the work of our Redeemer. And as a result of that, the church benefits and is blessed richly as a result. So all that to say, here's Ryle. Spurgeon is good, Gil is good. Ryle just nails it when he explains the symbolism used here. He says that fig tree full of leaves but barren of fruit was a striking emblem of the Jewish church when our Lord was upon the earth. He says the Jewish church had everything to make an outward show. It had the temple, the priesthood, the daily service, the yearly feasts, the Old Testament scriptures, the rituals of the Levites, the morning and evening sacrifice. But beneath these goodly leaves The Jewish church was utterly destitute of fruit. It had no grace, no faith, no love, no humility, no spirituality, no real holiness, no willingness to receive its Messiah. And hence, like the fig tree, the Jewish church was soon to wither away. It was to be stripped of all its outward ornaments and its members scattered over the face of the earth. Jerusalem was to be destroyed. The temple was to be burned. The daily sacrifice was to be taken away. The tree was to wither away to the very ground. And so it came to pass, never was there a type so literally fulfilled." It's absolutely accurate, brethren. Again, there's differing views on the Olivet Discourse. But to a man, unless there's some odd duck trying to posit a difference between Matthew's version and Luke's version, they all agree that what's in view at least is the destruction of the temple that Jesus and his disciples were looking at. So I would argue that's the bulk of the emphasis is on that. Well, that's the emphasis. He's not talking about a rebuilt temple in our future. He's not talking about a rebuilt people of God or Israel of God in our future. They ask him about the temple they see. And he underscores it using the word generation. Now some have said, well that means the people that are living when Jesus comes. It never means that in Matthew. Matthew always uses genea the same way. It is that generation. Do you know when he's speaking? That can be consistently demonstrated from every use in Matthew's Gospel. The point of the acted parable, brethren, is that Jesus in the morning, when he's hungry, curses the fig tree. Jesus in the evening, when he returns from Jerusalem, curses the fig tree by giving prophetic explanation to what he had done in the morning. He tells his disciples concerning the destruction of Jerusalem, the destruction of the temple, and the sign of his coming at the end of the age. Jesus does that all on Tuesday. In fact, I would say Tuesday was a busy day for our blessed Lord. So we've identified the symbol. Notice the command. He says, let no fruit grow on you ever again. Immediately, the fig tree withered away. Now, the nature of the command, may you never bear fruit again forever. I mean, he really underscores this. The death of the tree is in view, not a temporary secession of its privilege. The death of the tree is in view. That's what is necessary to yield this particular fruit, or result. I shouldn't say fruit in that context. That result. Another has said, it's never, not at all, never again. Jesus is condemning this particular tree. Now, there is an objection to this command that is out there. Boy, that doesn't seem consistent with our Lord. I mean, he's gentle Jesus, meek and mild. Why in the world would he curse helpless fig trees? Imagine if Jesus did this today, the Fig Tree Preservation Society would chain themselves to trees. Don't you come near it, Jesus! It's a tree! It's one tree! You ever notice that people that champion the environment, like trees and pigs... What does Jesus do with pigs in Matthew 8? He sends demons into them and those demon-filled pigs run violently down the slope and drown themselves in the sea. He's against pigs. He's against trees. He's a bad man. Persons who worship the creature rather than the creator and go to that length to chain themselves and to fight for the rights of these poor defenseless pigs. And I'm not saying just go out and club pigs or just go butcher trees. But brethren, typically they're people that have no problem with babies being murdered in their mother's wombs. You've got big problems. If you're more concerned about a fig tree and its health than you are about an image bearer of the living God in utero. You've got big problems. And I don't want to have to deal with these sorts of things, but because we live in a culture that is so sensitive and so delicate when it comes to such things, we should at least have some understanding of what's going on. It's one tree. Who cares? Why would somebody get worked up about that? Jesus, that's a tree. That shows vindictiveness, Jesus. That shows callousness, Jesus. That shows, you know, a mean spirit. It's one tree that Christ uses to teach a most excellent lesson. I think Spurgeon's a better guide here. He says, "'To fell a whole forest has never been considered cruel, and to use a single barren tree as an object lesson can only seem unkind to those who are sentimental and idiotic.'" Thank you, Charles, for saying the obvious. He says, "'It was kindness to the ages to use a worthless tree to teach a salutary lesson.'" Isn't that right? Praise God! He'd rather curse that tree, and according to the parable in Luke 13, and according to the timeline, give them opportunity for repentance. You see, generation was fulfilled, literally, after Jesus ascends on high and leads captivity captive and gives gifts to men. When does the siege of Jerusalem occur? It's about 40 years later. This is a 40-year period in there where the Jews should respond to the preaching of the gospel. It was a dead tree designed by Christ to teach a salutary lesson to people. I think there's some significant things that we ought to surmise before we move on with reference to the cursing of the fig tree. Well, note the result. Immediately the fig tree withered away. Immediately the fig tree withered away. If you compare Mark's gospel, you see a little bit of a different order. You see Mark give us the statement concerning Jesus cursing the tree, then the statement of the section dealing with the cleansing of the temple, and then the statement from the disciples about the withered tree. See, Mark, it is even more conspicuous that we're supposed to understand the fig tree in light of the temple cleansing. You're supposed to get that. You're supposed to internalize it. You're not supposed to say, what does he mean by this fig tree? Could it have anything to do with the fact that he just drove out people from the temple in Israel? Yeah, that's it. That's what we should get. But brethren, there are several things that we ought to see. Immediately, the fig tree withered away. In the first place, the nation of Israel, as an ethnic people, would cease as the visible representation of the kingdom of God. It's just gonna happen, or that, according to Jesus, it has happened according to the rest of scripture. Matthew 21, 43 again, therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. Secondly, the earthly temple would cease as the visible dwelling place of the living God. You see, Solomon prophesied this in his prayer of dedication. If you use McShane's calendar, you're in 2 Chronicles 6. If you read on to chapters 7 and 8, you'll see that his prayer of dedication says that if the people of Israel are faithful to the Lord in their covenant keeping, if they're faithful to Yahweh, God will bless them. He will bless them richly, but if they are unfaithful, what's going to happen? God is going to drive them out of their land, and that is coming to pass in this particular section. The earthly temple would ultimately fall, and it would cease as the visible dwelling place of the people of God. In the third place, the nation and the temple would not be set aside, only temporarily, but forever. If words have meaning, brethren, and verse 19 means anything, let no fruit grow on you ever again means let no fruit grow on you ever again. It's not going to happen. No, never, forever. Tion, you've heard the word ion. It's where oftentimes we get the word eternal from. That's what Jesus is saying here. Fourthly, what the symbol portends is the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, which Christ will expound on in Matthew 24 specifically. It's a symbolic act. It's going to be explained Tuesday night to the disciples. That brings us to consider in the second place the lesson concerning believing prayer. It seems the disciples understood the lesson of the fig tree. Look at the text. Verse 20, and when the disciples saw it, this brings us to the lesson concerning believing prayer. When the disciples saw it, they marveled, saying, how did the fig tree wither away so soon? No, they don't ask, what does it mean? They want to know how it was done so soon. Their focus is on Christ's authority, not on His meaning. I suggest we can infer by their response that they were tracking. Because remember, they just saw Him drive out the money changers and the sellers of animals from the temple compound. They just witnessed this show of strength by our Lord to be consumed with zeal for the house of His Father. The disciples don't ask, what do you mean by cursing that poor fig tree? Don't you know that particular grain group is going to be very upset about that? No, that's not what they do. So how did it happen? They marvel, just like they've marveled before. Just like persons throughout Matthew's Gospel marvel in the presence of the authority of Christ. We saw one of the most consistent ones, or one closest rather, to this in Matthew chapter 8. After Jesus calms the sea and he calms the wind, they're afraid and they say, what kind of a man is this? What kind of a man is this? We see the sorts of men that get wet in the rain. We see the sorts of men that float boats in waves like this and they capsize. We have never seen the kind of man that can speak to waves and who can speak to wind and who can make them be silent. What kind of a man is this? You see, that's where their question focuses. Notice verse 20, when the disciples saw it, they marveled. How did the fig tree wither away so soon? How did it happen, Lord? They question his authority, which, interestingly, is what the religious leader is going to question in verse 23. Christ, doing the things that Christ does, is an issue of provocation for the religious leaders. By what authority do you come into our temple and drive people out? By what authority are you teaching these things? By what authority are you receiving the hosannas of Jerusalem, the hosannas of Galileans, and you're receiving the hosannas of these little children that have the ability to list praise to God? Why is it, or who gave you this authority? You see, it's an issue of authority, ultimately, that comes to pass with reference to Jesus and the religious leaders, but you even see it here. The disciples who had been with Christ this long are still marveling. Brethren, as a sideline application, as disciples of Christ in the 21st century, shouldn't we still marvel? How many times do we read our Bibles and amazing things happen and we just go on to another cup of coffee? Do you ponder? Do you reflect? Do you contemplate? Do you reflect upon the reality that Christ can speak to a tree and kill it? You say, well, I quite like trees, so I don't want to reflect on that. It's the authority of Jesus over the created order. Certainly the Creator has the power over the creature. Brethren, we ought to marvel as well when we read the glorious accounts of our Lord's authority and power. When He heals blind people, when He raises the dead, when He cures lepers, when He shows that sort of omnipotent compassion to those in need. May it be the cause for rejoicing in the presence of God. May we think, wow, this Christ has power and authority over nature such that he can still the waves and still the wind and he can curse barren fig trees. This Christ is worthy of our worship and praise and adoration and of our marveling and our amazement. I think we've lost something of that in the church today. We've lost something of the marveling and the amazement and the presence of God. I think Solomon had that in his prayer of dedication. The earth can't contain God. This temple can't contain God. The very creation itself can't contain God. He is the Lord God Most High. When we come to the Church of Christ, for instance, ought it always to be hyper-casual? and just horizontal, and just about me and my shot in the arm. No, we're coming into the presence of the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. Let there be a reverence, and a fear, and a marvel, and an amazement that infests our hearts so that we respond properly. And when we sang 105 this morning, which is essentially Psalm 148, what is the psalmist telling us? That all the creation of the earth is to praise God. Sea creatures, fig trees, men, angels, the entirety of God's created order ought to praise and worship and glorify Him. Brethren, the honor of God trumps our personal happiness, our personal satisfaction, or our personal fulfillment. It's God's glory Jesus teaches us to pray for in the first place in the Lord's Prayer. Our Father, which art in heaven, hallowed be your name. We talked about this on Wednesday night because Jesus, lesser son David, prays or eulogizes Saul and Jonathan in a similar manner. We start with God. There's a theological priority and order to everything the Saint of Christ does. And prayer is certainly one of them. And so is the worship of God in the public place. You know, churches are treated like, you know, is it McDonald's or is it Burger King or is it Wendy's? You know, they got good pickles over here. I like the way they do their meat over here. Brethren, that's not how the church is supposed to be treated. The church faithfully doing what the church is supposed to be doing isn't a Wendy's. It's not a McDonald's. It is the church of the living God and the fact that some men in leadership market churches that way, shame on them. And shame on us, the consumer, for buying that dreck. Hat tip to my daughter for the word dreck. She used it last night and it just fit right there beautifully. There's a marvel. There's an amazement. There is a sobriety in the presence of God. It's not frivolity. It's not casualness. It's not sipping lattes with Jesus. It's worshiping and praise and adoration with a holy fear and reverence deep down to our bones because we're in the presence of a man who can curse fig trees, a man who can talk to wind and waves, a man who can still those things, and a man who ultimately laid his life down for us and took it up again to save us from our sin. Certainly in the presence of such a man, we marvel. In the presence of such a man, we stand amazed. In the presence of such a man, we focus upon the worship of our living God. Notice, they ask the question, they marvel, how did the fig tree wither away so soon? Note Christ's response. And I think it's intriguing, if we're following the narrative, how does Jesus refer to the old covenant temple? via Isaiah 56.7. It is a house of prayer, right? Now that's synecdoche. A synecdoche is when you have something that stands for the whole. So in that particular instance, house of prayer means everything divinely authorized in the worship of God. Certainly you preach in the house of prayer. Certainly you pray in the house of prayer. Certainly you chant or sing psalms in the house of prayer. Certainly you give in the house of prayer. So it's a synecdoche. The part stands for the whole. We say this with reference to people on aircraft. We say there were 200 souls on board. Well the soul stands for the whole. It's a part that stands for the whole. But it is intriguing. The prophet Isaiah says this and the Lord Jesus quotes it. It's a house of prayer. Perhaps we're supposed to understand this connection. The old covenant house of prayer is about to be destroyed because it hasn't been faithful. It hasn't done what it's supposed to do. But in the new covenant, prayer is emphasized. Prayer is a priority. And Jesus goes down this path to instruct them concerning prayer. And I love what he says. He stresses two particulars. In the first place, he highlights the necessity of faith. And secondly, there is an implication for prayer. Notice. They asked, How did the fig tree wither away so soon? So Jesus answered and said to them, Assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt." You see, brethren, when you pray, you're supposed to believe that God is and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. You're really supposed to believe God when you pray. I know that may sound radical. It may sound just, you know, mind-blowing. If you're not believing God, you're probably not praying. And if you are praying and you're not believing God, you're not praying right. You need to believe Him. You need to believe that God is and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. But notice, He says, Assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt. What's a problem in prayer? Doubt. What's an enemy to genuine, believing, earnest prayer? Doubt. You hear people say today, well, you know, doubt has its place in the Christian life. Yeah, a wretched place. We have a God who cannot lie who has given us 66 books, divinely inspired, and we still doubt? I know I still do, too, so I'm not picking on you all. There is that within the heart of man, that sort of doubtful default. We're doubting Denison's and we have that disposition in our hearts. Jesus says don't have that disposition assuredly. He underscores it with this Amen. Truly, truly I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt. Notice he gives two exploits of faith. A faithful prayer. You will not only do what was done to this fig tree, but also if you say to this mountain, be removed and be cast into the sea, it will be done. Those are the exploits of faithful prayer. You'll not only do what was done to the fig tree. Now remember, the disciples had an authority and a power to work signs and miracles given them by Jesus in Matthew chapter 10 that we don't necessarily have. And I'm not sure that he's suggesting that they actually go out and curse fig trees. I'm not sure that he's actually saying they should go talk to mountains and ask them to jump into the sea. He is using hyperbole to tell them something concerning faith at the throne of grace. There may be an echo of Zechariah the prophet 14.4, though, in terms of an eschatological focus, when the Lord comes down upon the Mount of Olives and it splits open. The Greek Septuagint renders it that it goes to the sea. That might be involved here. I don't want to pursue that, but I simply suggest that, that it might be that particularly. The mountain associated with the people of God is going to go into the sea. Another, maybe at least, allusion to the reality of the fall of Jerusalem and her temple. But again, sideline note, you can put that out of your head. The point is, as Calvin says, it is a hyperbolical mode of expression. It was used in 1720 as well. Same sort of convention. What is Jesus underscoring to his disciples? You need to believe God. You need to have faith in God. Remember the disciples in their unique position, specifically as the Twelve Apostles. They are going to go and turn the world upside down. You know, we look at our society, we say, wow, it's so messed up. And I'm right there with you saying, wow, it's so messed up. Sodomy, abortion, euthanasia. I mean, just crazy, foolish responses to tragedy. I mean, things that are, that are to use the language of Spurgeon, just idiotic. Brethren, there is nothing new under the sun. Do you think the early church, living in the Roman Empire, had nothing but joy and happiness and daily bliss? They had abortion in the Roman Empire, they just didn't do it in state-sanctioned clinics getting funded by the federal government. They would simply take their child and put it on the trash heap. If it got eaten by dogs, that's the way it went. If the child got taken or kidnapped, not kidnapped, taken, and turned into a prostitute or a slave. That's just the way it was. But you see, it's this idea that, well, if only we had it like they did. They faced Nero, ultimately. They faced a regime that was oppressive and harsh, politically. Then they had the religious element in terms of unbelieving Israel. Paul's chief enemies in the very first part of his career in the Book of Acts wasn't Rome. It was unbelieving Israel. They're the ones that arrested him. They're the ones that turned him over to the Roman government. The first chief enemy of the Church, of Jesus Christ, was unbelieving Israel. And then, of course, the Roman Empire. You know what one text, though, they continually went back to? Pastor Kim read it at the outset of worship. I'd love to give everybody a quiz right now to see who actually gets it. Psalm 110, the Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies your footstool. Consider that confession of faith in the mouth of the early church in a debauched age with homosexuality too. See, we've developed and we've made technological advances in how to do wickedness. But all the wickedness has always been there, you see. I mean, we are working hard to perfect wickedness, but that's not to suggest there wasn't wickedness in the first century. And so these disciples, going about their task after Christ returns to heaven, to go and preach the gospel, to make disciples of all the nations, to baptize them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, and to teach them all things that Christ had commanded, and He gives that promise, and lo, I'm with you even to the end of the age. In order to do that, they have to believe God. Who's a great expression of that sort of faith? We see it in Romans 4, concerning Abraham, who, contrary to hope, did what? Cried, whined, went and sought therapy, blamed his mother, who contrary to hope, in hope, believed that the God who promised was able. You see, we don't want to become prosperity, you know, prosperity preachers or Christians when it comes to passages like these that are large with the promises of God. But on the other hand, we don't want to empty them of the promises of God. Christ commends believing without doubting prayer and says that we can do mighty exploits in such manner, then we ought to seize upon it by the grace of God and pray with that man, Lord, I believe, help thou mine unbelief, so that when I pray that you'll save my children or I pray that you'll save my family or I pray that you'll save the person next to me at work, God, when I pray that, I don't want to doubt. But I don't want to put your arm behind your back because all teaching on prayer ultimately must find its place in the will of God. You see, this isn't the first rodeo for our Lord in terms of teaching on prayer. He's already taught us the Lord's Prayer when you pray. Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. He doesn't say that so that we can come to Matthew 21 and go join Benny Hinn Ministries and say, whatever it is you want, you get it. You cannot read the Bible that way. You cannot divorce texts from texts. You cannot land on a passage like this and say, I'm going to pray for Mount Cham to wander down to the Pacific and to throw itself in, and I'm sure the Lord's going to deliver. Will you let me know how that goes? You just let me know. Email me, not every day, because that's going to get tedious. Email me about every 10 years. Let me know how it goes for you. Is it the will of God that Mount Cham actually go to the Pacific and throw itself? No. Christ is underscoring something about faith. Brethren, what's more difficult? To see Mount Sham run down to the Pacific and throw itself in? Or to see a sinner dead in trespasses and sin saved? Apart from God's grace, we'll see Mount Shams and other mountains like them running to the sea to throw themselves in before we'll see dead sinners raised. We pray according to the will of God Most High. Notice, he underscores, he ends, verse 22, an implication for prayer. And whatever things you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive. I hope I've sufficiently answered the thought, I wanna be an astronaut, I'm gonna pray to God to be an astronaut, I'm gonna become an astronaut. You may be, you know, you may be that one in a million that's gonna be an astronaut, but don't blame God if you end up not being an astronaut. The whatever there is qualified I want to be the most gorgeous specimen of a human being. That's not going to work, probably. I want to be the most successful person. Why is it that we pray like that? Typically, we pray for what we get, don't we? Maybe you don't, but, you know, the typical response of some when they pray is, you know, bless me, give me, help me, do for me this. We want stuff from God. We don't go into God's present and hallow His glorious name, pray for the coming of His kingdom, and say, Thy will be done on earth, not as it is in heaven. See, that's the context for how we understand and whatever things you ask in prayer, believing you will receive. This isn't a health, wealth, and prosperity text. They're wrong. They are simply Well, that concludes our exposition. A final few thoughts before we move to close. In the first place, we've sufficiently dealt with the authority of Christ. He has the power to speak to fig trees and to cause them to wither. In the second place, the power of prayer, the emphasis on faith and prayer, the corrosive influence of doubt on prayer. Doesn't James underscore this? Doesn't James highlight this for us in James chapter 1, specifically in verse 6? He says, Now, I realize that we all have doubts. The idea is to identify it, pray to God, ask Him to forgive us, and to help us. Lord, increase our faith. You do know you can pray that, right? Lord, increase my faith. You can say with that man, Lord, I believe. Help thou mine unbelief. None of us have the faith capacity that we could. As well, the promise of Christ to believing prayer. Max Chamberlain quoted somebody, he didn't know, he just kind of mentioned it. Prayer is impotence grasping hold of omnipotence. That's beautiful, isn't it? Prayer is impotence grasping hold of omnipotence. That's what Jesus wants us to understand here. As well, the implications of this cursed fig tree. In the first place, three sections, and it'll be quick. First place, Nation of Israel. Secondly, the Church of Jesus Christ. Thirdly, for the individual. In terms of the Nation of Israel, in the first place, under that sub-point, we see there is a covenantal transformation. In the Old Covenant, Israel as a people were the covenant people of God Most High. It was never, ever expressed to always and forever be that way. The promise to Abraham was that in him, all the families of the earth would be blessed. All the nations of the earth would be blessed. It would never be focused solely and alone upon the nation of Israel. Even in Old Covenant Israel, there were proselytes. Ruth's came in. There were others that came in. But by and large, it was confined to that body of people. Well, there was a covenantal transformation that occurred at the death of Jesus. When Jesus in Matthew 26 says, this is my blood of the new covenant which is shed for you for the remission of sins, what is he saying? He's saying that the old covenant has passed away. This is expounded on in Hebrews 7 and 8. Hebrews 7 and 8 tells us that the new covenant ratified by Jesus is a covenant that has a better hope. It has better promises because it is a better covenant. There was a covenantal transformation. That's why when we get to the Olivet Discourse, and I apply it to first century Israel and to the destruction that took place in AD 70, there's always going to be those who say, but the body count was higher at another particular time. In other words, say there was however many Jews killed in the first century, well there was a lot more killed in the Second World War, therefore you're wrong. The significance in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 is a public attestation of the reality that the New Covenant is here. You can see that in Hebrews 8.13 very specifically as well. It's covenantal transformation. It's not body count that's in view in that particular section. As well, we need to appreciate, as we've seen from 2143, Jesus tells us specifically, the kingdom of God will be taken from Israel and given to the church. You say, well it doesn't say that. We'll show you that it says that when we get there. That's the point of his statement. As well, this occurred as a result of covenantal unfaithfulness on the part of Israel. If we had time, you probably like when preachers say that, don't you? Because if we, you know, if he turns there, then that means you're going to read this block of text. Deuteronomy 28, 49 to 57. Deuteronomy 28, 49 to 57. What does God promise if they're unfaithful? I will send foreign invaders and they will drive you from your land and temple. In the siege, women will eat their own children. This occurred not only in the Babylonian captivity or in the siege of Babylon over Jerusalem. Josephus tells us it happened in A.D. 70. Women ate their babies because they were starving to death. Klein says Old Testament history, this is a commentary on Deuteronomy 28, 49-57. Old Testament history witnessed successive executions of this curse, and it was finally exhausted in the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. In the fourth place, we ought to see in this statement concerning Jesus and the fig tree, the finality of Christ's words. To locate fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy in a reconfigured Israel in the future is to miss covenantal trajectory in the Bible. The prophecies of the Old Testament find their fruition and fulfillment in Jesus. In him all the promises of God are yea and amen. And they're appended to us because we're attached to him by faith. That's why Paul in Romans 4, specifically in verse 13, can universalize the promise given to Abraham. Abraham was told to look north, to look south, to look east, to look west. Sometimes people say, well, he saw Israel. Paul tells us he inherited the whole world. Why is that the case? Because the seed of Abraham is the Lord Jesus Christ and he has all authority in heaven and on earth. He has the power and he has in his hand the entirety of the creation. It is a final statement. It is wrong to see this suspended until the Millennial Kingdom. If that doesn't sound like anything to you, you've never heard that, then stick around. You'll probably hear more when we get to Matthew 24. The place of Israel today. Some would charge me with anti-Semitism. Well, you're an anti-Semite. You're wretched. You're anti-Semite. That's not anti-Semitism. It's a respect for the biblical covenants. The biblical covenants lead us to the conclusion that the people of Israel, as the people of Israel, have been cut off, and that the church is the people of God, then that's where we go. No anti-semitism involved. Here's my language to the Jews today. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved. You see, that will provide more impetus to go to Jews and call them to repentance and faith than some delusion that there's going to be this reconvening in the state of Israel according to God's prophetic time clock. Brethren, they do not have a biblical warrant for being a geopolitical power today. Now, again, that's not anti-Semitism. 1948, God is sovereign. The decree of God certainly included that, but there's no biblical prophecy that said in 1948 the Jews are going to return to their land, everything's going to be great, magical, and 40 years later there's going to be this rapture and then the millennial king. That's not the point. Because it happens under the decree of God doesn't mean it's connected specifically to biblical prophecy. They are a geopolitical power today. I understand that. But not because of a text in scripture. People need to understand that. So we preach to them. Romans 11 talks about Jews and Gentiles. It talks about, you know, certain things concerning the Jews and their inclusion with the Gentiles as the people of God. I'm not saying no. Send me to Israel, preach the gospel. Send me with a Glock 9, too, but that's what Pastor Baruch Meaz said that he carried with him whenever he walked around the city in Israel there. As well, with reference to the Church of Christ, the Church must exercise caution. Paul tells us this in Romans 11, specifically in the context of 19 to 24. He's essentially saying that the Jews were cut off so that the Gentiles could be engrafted. This wild olive tree is going to be engrafted into the olive tree of God. And then Paul tells the Gentiles, don't be haughty but fear. If God was not remiss to cut off them in their unbelief, He's not going to be remiss to cut off you in your unbelief. We need to understand, brethren, we must exercise caution as the Church of Jesus Christ. We must bear fruit. Doesn't Jesus say this is what the church will do in 2143? The kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it? We have a building. We have in books. We have a piano. We have a pulpit. We have the leaves in place. We have the leaves in place. You look at this place, it looks like a fig tree. Is there fruit? Is there faith? Is there repentance? Is there charity? Is there love? Is there deference? Is there preferring others above ourselves? Is there the biblical fruit that God calls upon us to bear as the Church of Jesus Christ? Let us not fall prey to the same sort of thing that first century Israel fell prey to. They had the temple, they had the priesthood, but they didn't have any vital godliness We have the structure in place and we should have structure. Regular principle of worship makes me happy. All those things should be in there. But we need the heart of the matter. We need to express those things that are fruits. And we need to understand that the church who continues or persists in unfruitfulness runs the risk of being spat from the mouth of our Holy Lord. Isn't this what happened in the Old Covenant too? Isn't this what Yahweh said would happen to Israel of old? The land will vomit you out of its mouth. In the book of Revelation, Jesus says, I will vomit you out of my mouth. And in the final place, with reference to the individual, you must believe on the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation. You don't find a fig tree that's got leaves alone and then tape or nail figs to it. Without faith, there's no fruit. Without faith in the risen Christ, there's no life. Without faith in the gospel, belief in the gospel, a looking and a living with reference to Jesus, you will not bear fruit. You must have Christ. As individuals, you may look like fig trees. As individuals, you may have the leaves, but do you have the fruit? You will never have the fruit apart from the Lord Jesus. Our confession summarizes this well. Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness is the alone instrument of justification. Yet, it is not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces and is no dead faith, but worketh by love. If we look at the church and say, wow, the structure's in place, but there's no heart for true godliness, there's no biblical religion going on in the soul, We could say the same for individuals, young people, children, adults. Consider this reality. What do people see when they look at you? Do they see fig leaves? Do they see what appears to be a verdant piece of agricultural bliss? Inside, there's no fruit. Inside, there's no love for Christ. There's no love for men. There's no love for church. There's no love for scripture. There's no love for the world around us in terms of some compassion and evangelism and prayer for missions. Brethren, what is it that you are displaying? If the leaves are present and the fruit is absent, the response is to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. Come to the Savior. You must not be content to possess the leaves of a profession without the fruit of possession. And yet so many are. How many people would call themselves born-again Christians? that never think twice about abortion, never think twice about euthanasia, never think twice about, you know, we'll vote for this person, we'll vote for that. That person's about killing babies. You shouldn't do that as a believer. Figs don't do that. How many people would name themselves as evangelical Christians in Canada and in America? So there's a lot of apparent fig trees out there. There's a lot of leaves, you know, flowing in the wind. But is the fruit of the matter there? Ryle says, is not every fruitless professor of Christianity an awful danger of becoming a withered fig tree? He says, as long as a man is content with the leaves of religion, with a name to live while he is dead, and a form of godliness without the power so long his soul is in great peril." It may be the case that that describes you this morning. It may be the case that whether you're young or old, you want people to think you're a Christian. You go through the particular motions that bespeak Christianity, but there's no fruit in your heart. Again, the answer is to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. And if by the grace of God you have believed, then produce fruit. Be about bearing fruit. There's no greater joy than serving God Most High in the world that He has placed us. Let's not have a laziness or a callousness or a coldness or a hard-heartedness about that. If we are actually God's people, we ought to be bearing fruit. We ought to be producing figs. We ought to be of benefit to people around us and to help to those with whom we come into contact. Well, let us close in prayer and ask God to seal these truths to our heart to make us a fruitful people. Our Father, we thank you for the Word of God. We thank you for its consistency. We thank you for what it sets forth in all its parts. And the whole, the end of the whole is the glory of God. And we give you praise and thanks for this. We thank you for making us partakers of sovereign grace or by sovereign grace of a saving interest in the Lord Jesus and our hearts desire as others would believe on him that they would come out of darkness into marvelous light enabled by the power of your Holy Spirit. Go with us now we pray and we ask through Christ our Lord. Amen.
