The Lord of the Sabbath, Part 2
Sermons on Matthew
Well, please turn with me in your Bibles to Matthew chapter 12. Continue to go through the gospel according to Matthew. We find ourselves in verses 9 to 14 this morning. Matthew chapter 12, I will begin reading in verse 1 and read to verse 21 to set this particular section or passage in its context. So beginning in Matthew 12, verse 1. At that time, Jesus went through the grain fields on the Sabbath, and His disciples were hungry and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, Look, Your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath. But he said to them, Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him, how he entered the house of God and ate the showbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests? Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless? Yet I say to you that in this place there is one greater than the temple. But if you had known what this means, I desire mercy and not sacrifice, you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath. Now when he had departed from there, he went into their synagogue. And behold, there was a man who had a withered hand. And they asked him, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath that they might accuse him? Then he said to them, What man is there among you who has one sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not lay hold of it and lift it out? Of how much more value then is a man than a sheep? Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath. Then he said to the man, Stretch out your hand. And he stretched it out, and it was restored as whole as the other. Then the Pharisees went out and plotted against him how they might destroy him. But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew from there, and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all. Yet he warned them not to make him known, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying, Behold my servant whom I have chosen, my beloved in whom my soul is well pleased. I will put my spirit upon him, and he will declare justice to the Gentiles. He will not quarrel nor cry out, nor will anyone hear His voice in the streets. A bruised reed He will not break, and smoking flax He will not quench, till He sends forth justice to victory, and in His name Gentiles will trust. Amen. Let us pray. Our God and Father, we thank You for this opportunity to look at the Scriptures now. We pray for the ministry of Your Holy Spirit. We pray, God, that You would guide us and lead us into all truth, that you would help us and affect us with these things in your word. We pray for the forgiveness of our sins. We know that you are faithful and just to forgive those who ask. We praise you and thank you for your son, the Lord Jesus, and the provision that we have in him for forgiveness and for mercy and for grace. We just pray that in all of this you would be glorified, that you would be exalted, and that you would be well pleased to bless your people here with strength. And we ask through Jesus Christ our Lord, amen. Well, as we saw last week in verses 1 to 8, and as we'll see this morning in verses 9 to 14, there's conflict concerning the Sabbath. And I think sometimes for us as modern readers of the Bible, we don't always see the significance of the Sabbath. This is because, first of all, we're not Jews and we're not under this Jewish Sabbath law, but even within the church over the last 100 or 200 years, there has been a decline in appreciation for the fourth commandment. In fact, some would say that the fourth commandment of the ten is no longer binding upon us today. Obviously we differ with that assessment, but suffice it to say we don't always appreciate how Israel viewed the Sabbath days. So when we come to a passage like this, it's a bit perplexing. Well, the Sabbath was the day that God made in the Garden of Eden, according to Genesis chapter 2, after He finished His work of creation, the Lord God's Sabbath. One man says this was the day of enthronement for God, and it set a pattern for Adam in the Garden of this six-in-one rhythm. And then at Sinai, God gives this fourth commandment to the children of Israel. He later explains in Exodus 31 that the Sabbath itself was a sign between me and your generations, that it is God who sanctifies His people. The Sabbath for Israel became sort of a badge of identity. When you see a maple leaf, for instance, you think Canada, or most people think Canada. When you heard Sabbath, you thought Israel. You thought Israel's God, Yahweh. And so what happens here in this gospel record is that the Pharisees, who were allegedly sticklers to the law, were trying to trip up Jesus. In fact, in Matthew chapter 12, we see rising opposition against the Lord. He's accused of being a lawbreaker here, with reference to the Sabbath. Later on, as we continue in the narrative, after the section we just read up to, Jesus is accused of being an agent of Satan. And then later on in chapter 12, Jesus is accused of being a self-appointed teacher. And so the Pharisees, the religious leaders of His day, are rising in their opposition to Him, and it culminates here in verse 14, that they want to destroy Him. And so what we find here in these Sabbath conflicts really isn't ultimately about the details of the Sabbath, rather it's about His claims to being the Lord of the Sabbath. In other words, it's the authority of Christ that ultimately incenses these men and causes them to want to kill Him. Well, as we consider this second aspect of Sabbath conflict this morning, we'll consider three things. First, the Pharisees' accusation in verses 9 and 10, and the Lord's response in verses 11 to 13, and then the Pharisees' plot in verse 14. So that's a bit of a map where we'll go this morning in our consideration of Matthew chapter 12, verses 9 to 14. And as I often say, if you miss these introductory bits, I think in many respects they are for me to refresh my mind in terms of our context, because it's never good to study the Bible in isolation from the context. We need to understand what is going on in the life, the ministry, and the mission of our Lord Jesus Christ. But note, first of all, the Pharisees' accusation in verses 9 and 10, the setting. He left the grain fields. Chapter 12, verse 1, we find Jesus going through the grain fields on the Sabbath. Of course, His disciples are hungry, they began to pluck the heads of grain, and as a result, the Pharisees accuse Him, or accuse them, of being guilty. They bring the charge to the Master, because of course he would be responsible for his disciples. Your disciples do what is unlawful to do on the Sabbath. The Lord Jesus then points them to the Scriptures. He gives them a five-fold response there with reference to the activity of the disciples. He first highlights the example of David. It was not sinful It was not wicked, it was not evil for David to go into the house of God and to seek food on the Sabbath day, and to eat that showbread which was for the priests alone. In other words, if the Pharisees' indictment of Jesus' disciples is true, they must also indict King David of Israel, and that they're not going to do. Jesus then highlights the ministry of the conduct of the priests. The priests profane the Sabbath. In other words, the priests get up early on the Sabbath day, and they work hard in terms of sacrifice. But they're not guilty of breaking the law. Jesus then highlights the reality that He Himself is superior to the temple itself. He says that He is greater than the temple. Later on in this chapter, He says He is greater. than the prophet Jonah. He is greater than King Solomon. So in each of these instances, Jesus is a superior and greater prophet, priest, and king. Jesus then highlights the testimony of Hosea the prophet. You need to understand what God spoke through the prophet Hosea. I desire mercy and not sacrifice. And then he asserts his Lordship, his comprehensive Lordship. He is the Lord even of the Sabbath. And so this is the context of the Sabbath. He departs from the grain fields, now he enters into their synagogue. It's interesting the way it's identified here. It's their synagogue. It's not his synagogue. Of course, if he's in Capernaum, this would be his home synagogue, but there is, as I said, opposition rising. There's a contrast building between the religious leadership of Israel and the mission and ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ. Chamblin says, in this instance, the personal pronoun, there, reflects the growing rift between Jesus and the nation's leadership, represented here by the Pharisees, whose forthcoming action in 1214 is a chilling reminder of 1017. Remember what Jesus reminded his disciples concerning. They will scourge you in their synagogues. They will destroy you because of the cause of Jesus Christ. It's also interesting here, just by way of a long sideline note, it's become popular over the last, I don't know, hundred years with the emergence of a particular book, to ask the question, what would Jesus do? WWJD. May I suggest that Jesus would go to church on Sunday. Look at where he is on the Sabbath day. There's this growing rift. He understands it. There's opposition. He is the Lord of glory himself. He is the one, according to the apostle, in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. And yet he submits himself to this ecclesiastical authority, and he is found in the synagogue on the Sabbath day. We ought to follow his example in this area. Now note, secondly, with reference to their accusation, the situation. Verse 10, and behold. This is Matthew's word. Not just Matthew's, it's a Greek word used often by Matthew. Behold. Pay attention. Look at this. Understand. Very often it's used to signify when Jesus is going to do a miracle, or exercise some power, or majesty. Matthew wants us to pay close attention to what is happening in this situation. Behold, listen, look, pay attention to this. Give your attention to these things. It says that, Behold, there was a man who had a withered hand. The word means it's dried, it's paralyzed, it's restricted from work. Luke's parallel in Luke chapter 6 verse 16 indicates that it's his right hand. Now, in a situation where men probably didn't make their living on a computer, which I know they didn't, he was probably a laborer. And without the aid of his most strong hand, I know lefties have a solidarity and they like to think that they're special, and I'm not here to tell you you're not special, but more often than not, people are right-handed. Right? Jesus sits down at the right hand of the majesty of God on high. Now, don't take that as a diss if you are left-handed. But Luke highlights, the narrative highlights, this guy's in bad shape, but it's not life-threatening. He's not going to die on this particular Sabbath day because of a withered hand. And so that's setting up the situation here, and that leads then to the particular question that the Pharisees ask. And behold, there was a man who had a withered hand, and they asked him, saying, is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath? This is the same thing we found In verse 2, look, your disciples do what is not lawful on the Sabbath. The command is given at Sinai. It's repeated on the plains of Moab in Deuteronomy 5. It's fleshed out in certain details, but not as descriptive as man would want. And so in the Jewish Talmud, in the Mishnah, they gave 39 categories of work that was prohibited by the Fourth Commandment. These men are operating not based on the law of God, but based on their tradition, based on their interpretation, based on their understanding that as we move through the narrative we see is faulty. Our foundation for life and ethics and doctrine and practice must be the written Word of God. It mustn't be our tradition. It mustn't be our addition. And in this adding to the Scripture, in putting up these 39 categories, people could say, well, you know, they're sticklers for detail. They want to make sure they don't violate the law. That's respectable, isn't it? No, it's suggesting that God doesn't know how to protect His law. It is always wrong, brethren, for us to add to the law something that God Himself hasn't spoken. You may think it's a good idea. You may think it's a right application. You may be convinced of your particular preference. But as much as God the Lord is against you taking away from the Word, so God the Lord is against you adding to the Word. And that's what's going on in the narrative here. Notice that Matthew highlights for us their particular motive. They ask the question, is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath that they might accuse him? They're not looking for information. They're not looking for a theological dialogue. Jesus, by this time, is known as a rabbi. He's known as a teacher. He has been seen teaching multitudes and peoples. He has been seen interacting with these religious leaders. They're not asking Him what's His view, what's His interpretation, what's His take. They're challenging His assertion in verse 8 that He Himself is the Lord of the Sabbath. They want to accuse Him. It's a legal word. They want to build their case against Him. They are already growing opposed to Him, and they want to get rid of Him. He is a threat to their way of life. They are addressing the Lord of the Sabbath on a particular interpretation to try and trip Him up. That's it. They're not looking for information. You ever met those people? They come to you and they ask you a question, and you know in the way that they phrase it. They're not asking you a question. They just want an opportunity to establish their particular point. You'll hear this in Christian gatherings at times, at the Q&A. You know, the pastor, the scholar, the respected doctor is up there and somebody has an agenda. Somebody is not looking for information. Somebody just wants to make sure that all these poor slobs are being taught the right way through his question. That's what these guys are doing. to the Lord of the Sabbath, to the one who is greater than David, to the one to whom the tabernacle pointed to, the one who is the embodiment of mercy himself, the one who has comprehensive lordship over all things, They are trying to accuse Him. You've got to pay attention. When we move through Matthew's Gospel, as you understand this rising opposition, it has to jump into your head at a certain point. Why are they against Him? Why do they want to destroy Him? Why is verse 14 in this particular section? What is it about this Jesus that makes people so angry, that makes them so vehemently opposed, that makes them want to destroy Him, and if they can't get to Him, they will destroy his people. What is it about this Christ? And Matthew wants you to understand what it is about this Christ throughout his gospel record. Now notice, there's the accusation. Let's look at the Lord's response, verses 11 to 13. It's fourfold. Jesus does what a rabbi does. He asks them a question. It's a good teaching technique when it's done properly, when it's Jesus, not them. He asks a question, he establishes a contrast, he draws an implication, and then he gives a command. That's the fourfold response that Jesus engages here in verses 11 to 13. Notice, then he said to them, what man is there among you who has one sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not lay hold of it and lift it out? There is a growing concern about Christ. Verse 8 is sort of the linchpin in these two narratives. Verse 8 summarizes or climaxes verses 1 to 7, and verse 8 introduces this situation in verses 9 to 14. So Jesus asks this particular question, and it's a good question. What man is there among you? He has one sheep. This suggests a poor man. He doesn't have a hundred sheep, he has one sheep. Kind of almost is analogous to this man with a withered right hand. He's obviously poor, he's obviously destitute, he obviously can't work because he's in an agrarian society and he's only left-handed now. Probably not by birth either. It's a good question. The law stipulated mercy to animals. Deuteronomy 22, 4. You shall not see your brother's donkey or his ox fall down along the road and hide yourself from them. You shall surely help him lift them up again. It's probably a property law, but nevertheless, when this animal is fallen, help it up. Proverbs 12 verse 10 describes a righteous man this way, a righteous man regards the life of his animal, but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel. Now we don't worship the creature, we don't worship nature, we don't run around singing Born Free and Berries and Nuts and adoring the animals, but we are not to be irresponsible. We are not to be butchers in an ungodly manner. The Lord is sovereign over the universe. The earth is the Lord's in all its fullness. Christian people are to be stewards of those things. So Jesus appeals to something that they very well have done on the Sabbath day. Which one of you? Is there anyone in the synagogue today, in Capernaum, who if his sheep was in the... his one sheep was in a ditch, wouldn't help him out? Now, interesting, in the history of rabbinic interpretation, there were those who said, you don't help it out. In fact, the Qumran community, the ones where we've gotten the Dead Sea Scrolls from, Qumran apparently said that you could feed the beast while it was in the ditch, but you couldn't try to work to get it out. Or you could throw something into the ditch so that the beast could then grab footing and try to work its way out. Do you see what men did with the Sabbath that was made for man and not man for the Sabbath? They put up all these artificial things. They put up all these details. They put up all these issues. Jesus strips it all away and says it's lawful to do good on the Sabbath. That's it. You don't need to make it that hard. You don't need to make it that convoluted. You don't need to make it that difficult. God gave this for the good of man. He himself was enthroned on this Sabbath day. Adam would see this as a rhythm of one and seven, wherein he would rest and be blessed and worship his God. And certainly on that day, Adam could fetch his sheep out of the ditch if it fell into a hole. But the rabbinic interpretation probably was not held to that strictly. In other words, though the Qumran community and though some of these rabbis made these stipulations, the garden variety man in Israel fetched his sheep out of the ditch on the Sabbath. Manson says, "...the form of the question suggests that Jesus is not appealing to rule, but to the actual practice of his hearers. The question is addressed to men as men, and ordinary humanity is expected to supply the answer." This is one of those questions that's set up in this way. If you, for instance, didn't like to eat liver, and I were to say to you, you don't like liver, do you? What's the expected response? Well, of course I don't like liver. You don't like hitting your thumb with a hammer, do you? Well, no, of course I don't. That's what he's doing here. Which man of you on the Sabbath doesn't fetch his one sheep out of the ditch? Of course we do. This is common. This is Proverbs 12. This is Deuteronomy 22. This is being a normal human being. This isn't being the most righteous law keeper in Israel. This is just being a decent, normal person. The parallel passages in Mark and Luke's gospel, Jesus says, is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill it? Of course to save life. Of course to do good. Luke 6, is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do evil, to save life or to destroy it? Now what man is going to stand up and say, you need to do evil on the Sabbath day. You need to destroy sheep. You need to destroy men. You need to leave men with withered hands alone. It doesn't matter that they can't work. It doesn't matter that they can't exercise their power. It doesn't matter that they can't. You just leave them alone because it's the Sabbath day. It's crazy, isn't it? Again, it's very easy for us to see it with the Pharisaic misinterpretation of the Sabbath command, and miss it with reference to our issues, and miss it with reference to our additions. I'll just quote him now. Charles Hodge makes this statement. It is a common saying that every man has a pope in his own bosom. That is, the disposition to lord it over God's heritage is almost universal. Men wish to have their opinions on moral questions made into laws to bind the consciences of their brethren. That is precisely what the Pharisees are doing, and Jesus is systematically ripping it apart. Note his contrast. Note the contrast in verse 12. Of how much more value, then, is a man than a sheep? In chapter 6, verse 26, Jesus says, look at the birds of the air. Are you not of more value than they? Chapter 10, verse 31, do not fear, therefore, you are of more value than many sparrows. Again, we ought not to engage in an irresponsible use of the creation. You don't take baseball bats and beat animals up for a thrill. The Bible is clear, man is more valuable. God would have us to fight more for baby humans than baby whales. God is concerned with His image bearer, and that's the backdrop of Jesus' statement when He says, of how much more value is a man over a sheep. Jesus is thinking, Genesis 1, God made man in His own image, in the image of God He made man. He breathed the spirit of life into man. We have a soul, we have rationality. You know, I always wonder, I often amuse on this, I think about this on Sunday mornings. One of the animals will jump up in my lap. When I say animals, I don't mean elephant, I mean a cat or a dog. And I've thought about that before. I'm sitting here reading my Bible or reading something and I realize they can't do that. They will never be able to do that. Why? Because they're not image bearers of God. They were not created with knowledge and righteousness and holiness. They were not given dominion over the creatures. What we have here with this man with a withered hand, that these Pharisees are all upset about, is it lawful to heal him on the Sabbath day? These self-same Pharisees would fetch one sheep out of a ditch. They would have steamed a sheep over an image-bearer. So Jesus is ripping down their defenses, and now Jesus draws out this implication. Notice, in verse 12, therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath. The fourth commandment was made for man. Of course it is lawful to do good for man on the Sabbath. And if it's lawful to do good on the Sabbath, then look how he's answering the question. It is certainly lawful to heal on the Sabbath. You see what he's doing? He's silencing his opponents. He is shutting their mouths. He is stripping away their defenses. You know, Mark tells us something interesting in this section as well. Remember, the authors are not contradictory. Matthew, Mark, and Luke are historians. They're recording the record of the doing of the Lord Jesus Christ and His earthly ministry, but they're theologians. They're putting together their narratives to set forth the theology of who Christ is. And Mark indicates something interesting about the humanity of Christ in his record of this instance. It says, "...and when He, Jesus, looked around at them with anger." He looked around at them with anger, being grieved at the hardness of their hearts. It was a righteous anger. Jesus was holy, harmless, and undefiled. Don't necessarily take this text and say it's okay for me to jump on my horn and scream at the guy in front of me when he slows me down on Yale Road. It's probably not righteous anger. But in this instance where people are showing more esteem for a sheep than a man, where people are more concerned with their pharisaic details than with the law of God, when people have missed by this much the entire point of the fourth word, Jesus is angry with them, He is grieved with them, because they are hard in their hearts. This is what happens to the legalist. This is what happens to a man who does not treat God's law appropriately. appropriately and responsibly. It doesn't make God happy. It doesn't make God joyful. He doesn't say, isn't that wonderful that you've added all those stipulations that were born out of your own heart. No, leave my law alone. I am able to speak to issues dealing with matters of faith and practice. I am able to so structure my word that everything you need for the glory of God and the salvation of your souls is there and revealed. Jesus is upset at these men because of their attitude. Now notice fourthly and finally the command. Verse 13, then he said to the man, stretch out your hand. It's interesting because this is all somewhat incidental. This fellow woke up on a Sabbath day. He got himself out of bed, he ran a comb through his hair, he made his coffee or whatever the equivalent was, he had his breakfast and he marched his way to the synagogue on the Sabbath in Capernaum. What is the point of the passage is not necessarily the healing of this man, though as wonderful as that is, I'm sure that man would say that's the point of the passage. But you remember back in chapter 9? Remember when Jesus is teaching in that house that's packed with people, and these four men bring their paralyzed friend, and they can't come in because there's so many people. So they open up the roof, and they lower this man down. And when Jesus sees the man, he says, son, be of good cheer, your sins are forgiven you. And the Pharisees there are wondering in their own heads, who does this man think he is? Only God alone can forgive sins. So Jesus asks the question, which is easier, to say to the man, your sins are forgiven, or take up your bed and walk? Well, everybody would say it's easier to say your sins are forgiven, because we don't know if that happens. But if I make the pronouncement, take up your bed and walk, the proof is in the pudding. If he doesn't take up his bed and walk, then I do not have power. But what does Jesus say? but that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins." He looked at the paralyzed man and he said, take up your bed and walk. The miracle of His taking up the bed and walking pointed to, confirmed, and affirmed the greater miracle that Jesus forgave Him of His sins. In this instance, the same thing is at play. It's verse 8 that's the issue. His assertion of being the Lord of the Sabbath. When He tells this man with a withered hand to stretch forth his hand, and the man does it because the Christ who gave the command has the power to enable him to comply with the command. It affirms verse 8. Jesus is the Lord of the Sabbath. Jesus is God's Son. Jesus is King of Kings. Jesus is Lord of Lords. It also points backwards to the immediate context. He is David's greater son. He does exceed the priesthood of Old Covenant Israel. He is the one to whom the tabernacle pointed. He is the embodiment of mercy, according to Hosea 6.6. And He is the one that exercises sovereignty over the Sabbath. Again, you've got to remember, if you weren't here last week, we looked at a few passages. How many times in the Old Testament Scriptures does God, Yahweh of Israel, call the Sabbath, My Sabbath? You see, verse 8 is a claim concerning the Fourth Commandment, to be sure, but it's a claim concerning His deity, concerning His Lordship, concerning His Godhood, concerning the fact that He is the Second Person of the Trinity. come into this world, sinners to save. As well, on the human level, Chamberlain says the Lord of the Sabbath does not stand aloof from frail and fallen human beings. Instead, as the meek and humble servant of Yahweh, He addresses their affliction and bears their burdens. Remember, the immediate context of all of these conflicts concerning the Sabbath is Jesus' pronouncement in Matthew 11, 28-30. Come to me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you what? Sabbath! I will give you rest. I will free you from those burdens, I will free you from those labors, I will free you by my grace, and I will give you the rest that God held forth in that fourth word. truly is beautiful. And that brings us to consider finally the Pharisees' plot, verse 14. Matthew tells us in verse 13, He stretched it out, and it was restored as whole as the other. I mean, it'd be enough to say it was restored, or it was as whole as the other, but Matthew wants you to really know this man was healed. This man was really healed. He went home with the use of both hands. He called his boss, or he mailed his boss, or he texted his boss and said, I'll be in work tomorrow morning. This brother was happy. This man was thrilled. What does the scripture say to us in Romans 12? We are to rejoice with those who rejoice. Look at these men, verse 14. Then the Pharisees went out and plotted against him, how they might destroy him. In Luke's parallel in 6.11 it says, they were filled with rage. Do you imagine that? They're filled with rage. Jesus is right to be angry with them. Jesus is right to be grieved with them over the hardness of their hearts. But in this instance where the Lord of the Sabbath tells a man to reach out his withered hand, and it's whole, and it's restored, and it's just like the other one, It is wrong and wicked and vile for these men to be filled with rage. Instead of marveling at the power of God, instead of rejoicing that this man is now healed, instead of wondering at the reality that the Lord of Sabbath is standing right before their eyes, they're filled with rage. It's truly amazing, isn't it? If men ever wonder about the situation facing the world today, it isn't economics, it isn't politics. Those may be contributing factors and may find some way to hurt men in some small way. It is sin. It is the reality that these men are upset at the fact that Jesus Christ just healed a man. Like little children, like little babies. The Pharisees went out too, don't miss that. It's like the child who's upset, so he takes his marbles and he runs home. I'm not playing with you anymore. This is their synagogue, and in the midst of it, the Lord of the Sabbath exercises His sovereignty. He heals this man, and so they walk out filled with rage. We're not going back there. Like little babies. Again, it's not bad for babies to be babies. It's not bad for little children to be little children. Be little children. Be babies. If you're five, or if you're two, or if you're one. If you're a religious leader in Israel and you're filled with rage and you walk out of there like a baby, that's just wicked. It's terrible. It's bad. It's evil. So they went out and they plotted against Him how they might destroy Him. See, it's here we need to remind ourselves of where we've been in Matthew's gospel. How does Matthew begin? This is the book concerning Jesus, the son of Abraham, the son of David. He then details genealogy to verify this fact, that Jesus is the seed of Abraham, Jesus is the seed of David. We see the naming narrative. Joseph is told, you shall call his name Jesus, for it is he who will save his people from their sins. That sets the stage. That's programmatic. That's what the book of Matthew is about. It's about Jesus saving his people from their sins. We get to chapter 2, after the birth narratives, and what do we find? We find Herod enraged against Jesus, and he plots how he might destroy him. Why all these people wanting to destroy Jesus? Why all these people wanting to kill Jesus? What is the point behind the madness? Why the animosity? Why no love for the Lord of the Sabbath? This is the first time in Matthew's Gospel that we have read there's hints of opposition, there is suggestions of opposition. Jesus speaks in Matthew 9.15 of the days coming when the bridegroom will be taken away from them in the naming of the twelve disciples of the twelve apostles in Matthew 10.4. It speaks of Judas, and it gives us that parenthetical note, who would betray Him. So we're understanding, as I've said, there's animosity rising and growing, and here it comes to fruition. These men are plotting how they might destroy Him. This will take up much of the book from here on out. Several times in the narrative, the Lord Jesus will rehearse the fact that He must go to Jerusalem. Why must He go to Jerusalem to be tried, to be delivered up, to be crucified at the hands of godless men? Jesus knew exactly what He was doing. Jesus understood everything. Jesus was not mixed up. Jesus was not confused. Jesus didn't just meander down the road wondering what thing was going to happen to him today. There was a consciousness and a reality that he knew what was looming ahead for him. Jesus didn't come first and foremost to start a new religion. Jesus didn't come first and foremost to start a new philosophical school. Jesus didn't come first and foremost to do good things to people. Jesus didn't come first and foremost to heal the sick, and to feed the poor, and to raise the dead. All of Matthew's gospel is pointing to this reality. These Pharisees plotted how they might destroy him. And we need to come to grips with that. Why? Does 12.14, why would man, looking at the Lord of the Sabbath himself, want to kill him? The word's actually much severer than kill. It's not just kill, it is to destroy. It's one thing to kill something, it's another to destroy it, to rip it apart limb from limb. They would not be happy until it culminates and away with him, away with him, crucify him. Now these several Pharisees in Capernaum could not do the deed itself. It would ultimately be when he'd go to Jerusalem and face the High Council, the Sanhedrin. It would be them that would render the death warrant upon him. because they didn't have authority under the Roman government. They had to seek out Rome's assistance. They had to engage in harlotry. They had to engage in horda. They had to come up to these men in the Roman magistrate and get them to give this verdict. Why? What's the deal? Calvin says, it is truly monstrous and shocking that the most distinguished teachers of the law who are entrusted with the government of the church are engaged like robbers in contriving murder. Don't miss that. These are the religious leaders. These are the guys that should know better. These are the guys that should be operating according to mercy. And just look at just how foolish it is. Have you followed the argument? What are they upset for? He healed a man with a withered hand on the Sabbath day, which, incidentally, Jesus did not break the Sabbath, even by their own restrictions. He didn't lift up his hand. He didn't reach out his hand, he didn't touch the man, he didn't hug the man, he didn't comfort the man, he spoke a word, and the man reached out his hand and it was healed. So even by their own Mishnah, even by their own restrictions, he did not break the Sabbath. But consider this, they're upset, they're filled with rage in their heart, and they're plotting how they might destroy him because he healed a man on the Sabbath. Is it lawful to plot the destruction of another human being on the Sabbath? You see how foolish legalism is? You see how perverse it is? You see how whacked out we can get? There's an interesting thing later on in the gospel accounts when they come to the Pretoria. They come to the Gentiles. when they come to get the ruling wherein Christ will be delivered up and crucified. They don't want to go into the praetorium because it was a holy day and they didn't want to defile themselves. Are you kidding me? You are plotting the murder of the only innocent man that's ever lived and you want to maintain your ceremonial ritual. They are outraged, they want to murder, they want to destroy the Lord Christ, because He heals a man with a withered hand on the Sabbath. Are you seriously telling me that on the Sabbath day it's lawful to plot the destruction of the Lord of the Sabbath? It's absolutely amazing, and it highlights, as I've said, sin. That's why they want to plot to destroy Him, because of sin. It's not so much, again, the Sabbath and its details. It is the authority of Christ. This first mention, this is Carson, of a plot to kill Jesus springs from disputes not about the legality of various Sabbath activities, but about Jesus' authority. The Sabbath conflicts are not the cause of the plotting, but its occasion. Therefore, Sabbath disputes were not mentioned at Jesus' trials. In themselves, they were never as much an issue. as Jesus claimed to be the Sabbath's Lord. That's what they're upset about. That's what they're enraged about. It's verse 8. So what do we learn from this passage? I think we learn a lot of things, but we won't be here for a lot of things. We'll learn just a couple of things. The first, again, this is in an attempt to educate our congregation with reference to our confessional standard. We do not believe the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith is on par with the Scripture, but we do it serves as an accurate summary of those things most surely believed among us. And one of those things is the perpetuity, that means the abiding reality, of the Fourth Commandment. In the Old Covenant, it was as a result of God's creation activity that was observed on the seventh day. In the New Covenant, it is due to Christ's re-creative activity, and therefore it is on Sunday. If you're interested in developing that particular argument, come this Wednesday night. We're going to do a biblical theology of the Sabbath. It abides. How is it the case that we think nine of the Ten Commandments are for us? How could we possibly conceive of such a thing when in 4.9 of Hebrews it says, there remains therefore a Sabbath rest for the people of God. We have seen in our studies last week works of necessity are okay. I don't even like the language of some commentators. Works of necessity, works of piety or works of mercy override the Sabbath. No, they don't. They are consistent with the Sabbath. It is lawful to do good. It is lawful to worship God. It is lawful to be merciful. Normal, decent human beings get this. Why the Pharisees stumbled, I'll never know. A statement made by a man in terms of the Sabbath command, Gilfelon, he says, Christ was careful to clear it from Jewish corruptions. He was careful to clear it from Jewish corruptions, and if there was any precept more particularly vindicated by him and honored than another, it was that requiring the Sabbath day to be kept holy. He makes this observation, it is not the practice of a wise man to repair a house which he is about to pull down. Why go about and vindicate the Sabbath only to say it's done? Gilfillan's right. You see, brethren, it's not unlawful to do works of necessity. It's not unlawful to do works of piety or to do works of mercy. This jumps out from the passage. We cannot miss this. It is lawful to do good on the Sabbath day. Secondly, we have seen, as I hope you have seen, the folly or the foolishness of legalism. These Pharisees plot to murder Jesus on the same Sabbath that they get upset that he healed a man from his withered hand. This is one of those things, we see it in others, we don't see it ourselves. A man once preached on pride and he said, ''Pride is like bad breath. Everybody knows you have it but you.'' People are constantly handing you breath mints and gum. Take them. Legalism's sort of like that, isn't it? As Hodge says, we got a pope in our bosom. That is the propensity, the desire, and the zeal to make our preferences other people's laws. Chesterton well said, if men will not be governed by the Ten Commandments, they will be governed by the 10,000 commandments. Oh, how I love your law, the psalmist says. That ought to be the expression of the redeemed heart. Not our whacked-out interpretations of that law, but the law itself. 1 John tells us the commandments are not grievous, they're not burdensome. The Christian shouldn't hear that God wants a day where you rest. God wants a day where you worship. God wants a day that you sanctify for His use and for His glory. That shouldn't be a burden. It shouldn't be, oh, how I hate your law. It is my consternation all the day. I can't stand it. It's grieving. I want to go do my thing. God promises a special blessing from those who cease from their own thoughts, those who cease from their own ways, those who call the Sabbath a delight in Isaiah 58. A third thing, and I've already alluded to it, We need to appreciate in this passage the glory of Jesus Christ. The glory of Jesus Christ. For verse 3 to work in chapter 12, Jesus must be greater, or on equal par, or greater than David. He's greater. For the section on the priests to work, Jesus himself must be on the level with or above them. Jesus is better, greater than the tabernacle. This passage sets forth for us in glorious, vivid detail, the majesty and the excellency of the Lord Jesus Christ. And then fourthly, let's ask the question, why did they plot to destroy him? Kids, children, young people, I'm sure that in your young years, you've heard reference to some of those Old Testament books like Exodus or Leviticus or Numbers or Deuteronomy. Maybe you haven't read them cover to cover, which I suggest that you do. But one of the things you'll notice, especially in that book of Leviticus, is that God the Lord, who tells man, you shall have no other gods before me, prescribes the way that man is to worship Him. And man is to worship Him, according to those Old Testament books, through sacrifice. Why is that? Because God's holy. God's righteous. God has no impurity. There's no sin or evil in God whatsoever. You see, man is sinful. The Bible says, in Adam all died. The wise men said that God made man upright, but they sought out many devices. It's not important for us to know all of the particular sins that man commits, but to realize that every man commits sin. And so in order for a sinful man to stand in the presence of a holy God, according to the book of Leviticus, you need to bring a lamb, you need to bring a bull, or you need to bring some other animal to the tabernacle, or to the house of God. And the priest is to take his knife, and he's to cut the throat of that animal. The priest is then to take that animal, and he is to burn it, as unto the Lord. You say, that's kind of weird and that's kind of odd and that's kind of strange. God is holy and man is sinful and the only way that we breach the chasm is through sacrifice. So here's why Jesus had to die. Those bulls, those lambs, those animals that were sacrificed could never take away sin. They pointed forward to something. They pointed forward to the Lord Jesus Himself. In fact, you've all heard of John the Baptist. When he saw Jesus, what did he say? He said, Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. The Lamb of God? Yes! He is God's perfect Son. In order for sinful man to stand before a holy God, someone has to obey God's law. Jesus. Someone has to take the penalty due for sinners, Jesus. So when we see here that they went out and plotted against Him how they might destroy Him, to be sure, man is involved. To be sure, He is nailed to the cross by lawless hands. To be sure, that mob cries out, away with Him, away with Him, crucify Him. But it's all according to the plan of the Father. You see, the prophet Isaiah announced that the Lord was pleased to bruise him. The prophet Daniel said that Messiah Christ would be cut off. Psalm 22 is the psalm of the cross, long before crucifixion was even on the scene. And when we get to the New Testament authors and they interpret for us this death of Christ, one of the men in Hebrews 9 says, without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness. So when we see here that they plot how they might destroy him, learn, of course, the wickedness of man. How in the world could man deliver up a man that was righteous is only a sign of his wickedness. But realize that God the Father is orchestrating this. Realize the Father is behind this. Realize that the Father, in His plan to save His people from their sins, sends His Son to live and to die and to rise again. Without the shedding of blood, there's no forgiveness. That means with God, I can forgive you without you sacrificing, because I'm not only like God. But in order to approach a holy God, we have to be forgiven. We have to be cleansed. That's why Christians sing about the blood of Jesus. It's not because we have some ghoulish, macabre interest in the actual blood of Jesus. We have a spiritual and theological interest in the blood of Jesus. It is that which washes, it is that which purifies, it is that which cleanses, it is that which frees us from the guilt of sin. blood of Christ, the Son, that redeems us from all unrighteousness. In this gospel, Jesus will later say in Matthew 20, 28, the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve and to give his life a ransom for many. See, he was conscious of this fact. He understood the reality such that when he went into the Garden of Gethsemane, he is bleeding drops of blood. Not because men are going to nail him to the cross. Certainly that was no walk in the park. But he understood something about the wrath and fury of God. You see, on the cross, we see an expression of love. On the cross, we see an expression of grace. On the cross, we see an expression of mercy. But on the cross, we see an expression of righteousness. God, according to Paul, is able to be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus Christ. Because our sin wasn't just sent away, our sin was punished in the Lord Christ. That's why he had to die. That's why he came into this world. Sinners to save. And so you see, any attempt to try and buy God's favor through our good works, or to try and attempt to buy God's favor through anything other than His specified way, is going to end in futility. It is Christ alone to whom we must come. It is Christ alone who not only heals withered hands, but heals withered souls. It is Christ who takes away sin. It is Christ who gives the righteousness that avails with God. It is Christ that answers to everything that we stand in need of. That's why Jesus came to die. He didn't die and stay dead. He rose again on the third day. Isn't that beautiful? Paul says He was delivered up because of our offenses, and He was raised for our justification. He is not still on the cross. He is not still in the tomb. He rose on the third day. He ascended on high. He sits enthroned at the right hand of the majesty of the Father. And He says all those who believe on Him will have everlasting life. And in this, we rejoice. Well, let us pray. Our Father, we thank You for Your Word, and we thank You for the fact that Christ is Lord of the Sabbath. We just pray that you would encourage our hearts with these things, that you would build us up in our most holy faith, and that you would be glorified in these times together. We just thank you, Lord, for your mercy. We thank you for the ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ. We thank you for the forgiveness of sins that we have through him. And we pray in his most blessed name. Amen.
