← Back to sermon library
Could you please turn your Bibles
to the Book of Mark, chapter 1? The opening chapter of Mark at
verse 1. The primary portion of scripture
we will focus on this evening will be found in verses 1 to
4. But I will read until verse 13, actually I'll read to 15
to set the context. So, let us begin. The beginning
of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. As it is written
in Isaiah the prophet, Behold, I send my messenger before your
face, who will prepare your way. The voice of one crying in the
wilderness, prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. John appeared, baptizing in the
wilderness and proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness
of sins. And all the country of Judea
and all of Jerusalem were going out to him and were being baptized
by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. Now John was clothed
with camel's hair, and wore a leather belt around his waist, and ate
locusts and wild honey. And he preached, saying, After
me comes he who is mightier than I, the strap of whose sandals
I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I have baptized you
with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit." In
those days, Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized by
John in the Jordan. And when he came up out of the
water, immediately he saw the heavens being torn open and the
Spirit descending on him like a dove. And a voice came from
heaven. You are my beloved son, and with
you I am well pleased. The spirit immediately drove
him out into the wilderness, and he was in the wilderness
forty days, being tempted by Satan. And he was with the wild
animals, and the angels were ministering to him. Now after
John was arrested, Jesus came into Galilee, proclaiming the
gospel of God, and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom
of God is at hand. repent, and believe in the gospel. Amen. Well, let us go to our
great God in prayer. Our dear Heavenly Father, the
maker of heaven and earth, the one who deserves glory and praise
and honor, who set forth the Lord Jesus to save sinners from
their sins, we want to give you praise, God. We want to glorify
your name for this, God. We are in awe at your manifold
wisdom and goodness to us, Lord, how you chose to reveal your
goodness and kindness to wretched sinners like us in the Lord Jesus.
We thank you. We have such a Savior, the Great
High Priest, who understands exactly what we face every day,
Lord, yet did not sin. It is blessed to know this Savior,
Lord God, who lived the law in perfection and died as that perfect
sacrifice in the stead of sinners. This is something we need to
behold, Lord God, and we want to praise you and give you honor
for this, Lord God, and we pray that this blessed truth would
be proclaimed throughout the world that you might draw sinners
unto yourself, Lord God. Lord God, I pray right now that
your spirit would be in this place, Lord God, that you'd open
up our hearts, the hearts of the hearers, that we might know
what is right and holy and true of you, that we might know the
truth concerning the Lord Jesus Christ and concerning the one
who prepares his way, Lord, that we might know exactly what the
scripture is trying to say, Lord God. I pray that you would be
with me today, Lord, as I pray that your spirit would be upon
me as I preach, Lord. I pray that you would be magnified
and I would decrease, Lord, that people might see you and see
who you are and see your word, Lord God. We pray that you would
forgive us of all our sins, how we do transgress that law, Lord,
We transgress it daily, Lord, but we again thank you for that
one who died as that perfect sacrifice in our stead. We pray
today that this would be the day of salvation for sinners,
Lord God, and we pray that your name would be glorified this
day. In your holy name, amen. Well, before we begin our specific
exposition, since we haven't been going through the Book of
Mark, I think it would be good just to provide some introductory
comments concerning it. The Gospel of Mark is a fast-flowing
narrative, most likely penned by a man named Mark. His primary
audience is a Gentile audience, and his purpose for writing is
to exhibit that this Jesus of Nazareth that we've seen in verse
9 is Jesus Christ, the Son of God, whose authority is demonstrated
by his marvelous, awe-inspiring works. I just want to highlight
this idea concerning the author. Mark, the gospel of Mark, bears
apostolic authority. I don't think it would be in
the scriptures if it didn't. And the way we know this is through
Mark's connection with the apostle Peter. Some have said, or I've
heard it said that Peter, or sorry, Mark is Peter's gospel,
whereas Luke is Paul's gospel. So certainly those men aren't
apostles, but they bear that apostolic authority because of
their connection with both Peter And certainly Peter mentions
Mark at the end of his first epistle. He says, She who is
at Babylon, who is likewise chosen, sends you greetings, and so does
Mark my son. We see that intimate connection
between the two in that passage. Certainly similar to how when
Nesimus, the slave in Philemon, was considered as Paul's son,
that intimate connection, that spiritual father-son relationship,
surely we see that with Mark and Peter as well. And certainly
Peter in his second epistle highlights that he's going to make it possible
so that the church can recall certain things concerning the
Lord Jesus Christ. So certainly we have Mark who
has done that. Not only do we have a biblical
record concerning Mark as the author of it, but we have an
apostolic father who writes concerning this relationship. An apostolic
father is the second generation below the apostles. We have the
apostles, then the apostolic fathers, who are certainly disciples
of the apostles. And there's one man named Papias,
who is probably a disciple of the apostle John. And this is
what Papias says concerning this relationship. Mark, having become
the interpreter of Peter, wrote down accurately, though not indeed
in order, whatsoever he remembered of the things said or done by
Christ. So certainly this book bears
apostolic authority. It is one that we should be reading.
And as I've said before, it wouldn't be in the Bible if it didn't. The second thing I want to highlight
is concerning its audience. We're going through the book
of Matthew right now. Matthew is primarily written to a Jewish
audience. Mark, on the other hand, is primarily
written to a Gentile audience. This is very clear in the Book
of Mark. Certainly a Gentile audience
would necessitate an explanation of Jewish beliefs and customs. Furthermore, it would necessitate
certain explanations or translations of certain words that the Gentiles
wouldn't have understood. So in Mark 2, we have one example
where it highlights a belief concerning the Lord Jesus Christ.
In Mark chapter 2, which is a parallel of Mark chapter 9, which we have
seen already, it concerns the healing of the paralytic. Certainly,
these men have a friend who is paralyzed, they open the roof
and they lower this man down, and Jesus marvels at their faith
in him, and Jesus said, your son, your sins are forgiven. And certainly the Pharisees then
proceed to question in their hearts, who does this man think
he is? Who can forgive sins but God
alone? Who can forgive sins but God
alone is not in Matthew's gospel, but it is in Mark's gospel, which
highlights that the Gentiles would need some sort of explanation
concerning this belief. The second thing I want to highlight
too, regarding the audience, In Mark chapter 7, at verses
3 and 4, Mark explains a certain ritual that's part of Pharisaic
tradition concerning the washing of hands. Certainly the Pharisees
are questioning Jesus' disciples why they haven't been washing
their hands, and Mark makes pains to explain this. And the last
example concerning this Gentile audience is that Mark translates
certain expressions from Aramaic into the Greek. One example is
found at the healing of Jairus' daughter in Mark 5, 41. Jesus says, Talitha koumi, which
means, little girl, arise. Mark makes pains to explain that. Why would he have to explain
it if he was writing to someone who knew what it would have meant?
So certainly Mark is written to a Gentile audience, and that's
also, I think, reflected in the style that it is written. It
is a truly amazing book in the way that it is written. It is
written like a drama. It is fast, it is quick, it is
concerning the Lord Jesus Christ and what He is doing. And it
is written like a play. And certainly what better way
to write a gospel for a Roman audience than a quick-flowing
narrative about one who conquers sin, about a conqueror, right? So with that said, I just want
to highlight a quote that J.C. Ryle says concerning this gospel
compared to other gospels. He'll highlight that certainly
it isn't full of lengthy discourse, but more of what Christ is doing.
It is a gospel singularly full of precious facts about the Lord
Jesus, narrated in a simple, terse, pithy, and condensed style. if it tells us few of our Lord's
sayings, it is eminently rich in its catalogue of His doings."
And I think the way that it is written, it is written like a
play, I think it highlights the primary theme as well concerning
the doings of Christ. The reason Mark is writing his
gospel is to show that Jesus Christ, who is God, is the authoritative
one that Mark is calling his hearers to submit to. This isn't
some weak little Savior that we have. He's the Son of God,
and He has power to conquer sins, power to conquer His enemies,
and that's what Mark wants his hearers to see. Certainly, Mark
demonstrates that Jesus has authority over spiritual oppression. He
casts out demons pretty quickly in Mark chapter 1, over physical
illness, as I've already mentioned, the healing of Jairus' daughter,
over the elements when he calms the storm, and even over death
itself. He rises from the dead. He rises
from the dead. This is a powerful one that we
must submit to, that we must believe on, And we have a very
omnipotent savior that we can call upon. And so certainly,
so those three things I just want to highlight because I think
they aid in understanding Mark 1 verses 1 to 4. So now I want
to look at the, excuse me, I moved it. I want to look more at the
passage specifically. The pericope or passage of scripture
we are focusing on, which is found in verses 1 to 4, is part
of the introduction or the prologue, where Mark is introducing his
primary character, his protagonist. We see that in verse 1, the beginning
of the gospel of whom? Jesus Christ. It is about the
Lord Jesus Christ, and we will get into that in a little bit
more detail. And certainly at the beginning
of the Gospel, Mark is concerned with both the identity of the
forerunner and the identity of the Savior. So certainly Mark
is making pains in verses 1 to 4 to introduce his characters
and show that the gospel concerning him has its ministerial beginning
in prophetic fulfillment in verses 2 and 3. So let us look forward
and let us dive deeper into the passage under consideration this
evening. And we will look at Mark verses
1 to 4, sorry, 1 verses 1 to 4, under three points. Point
one, the gospel defined in Mark 1 verse 1. Secondly, the beginning
of the gospel foretold in verses 2 and 3, and the beginning of
the gospel fulfilled in verse 4. So notice verse 1, the beginning
of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. This first statement
of Mark indicates what the rest of this book is going to be about.
It's going to be about the Lord Jesus Christ. That's who it's
going to be about. Now some commentators that I've
read seem to think that verse one is only connected with the
introduction, that is verses one to 15. Others, whom I agree
with, think that this refers to the rest of the book as well. Certainly syntactically, based
on the connection in verse two with as, Mark is certainly highlighting
the beginning of the gospel, but as we will see, I think gospel
refers more to than just the beginning of it. And other grammarians,
too, that I've consulted seem to highlight that the construction
for the beginning highlights nothing but a title. It's the
title of the book. 1 verse 1 is the title. It is
the beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. So I just want to define the
Gospel in a little bit more detail. I know we've probably heard the
Gospel many times, but I think it is a good reminder to understand
what it is, and how we can technically define it, and how it can be
defined in Christianity as well. The term itself simply means
good news, or the announcement or proclamation that brings good
news. Certainly in this context, we
understand the four Gospels as literary genres, but I think
in this context it is more referring to a presentation concerning
the Lord Jesus Christ. Why do I think that? Because
Gospels haven't been written yet at this time, but certainly
we can understand that The Gospels certainly are a literary genre
that we look at now, but certainly Mark is trying to show that this
Good News is about Jesus Christ, not necessarily trying to write
a Gospel as we would understand it. And I want to make this point
as well. This Gospel has been written, as I've said, in the
form of a play. Certainly, Gospels do bear historical
veracity, but they're not biographies. They're good news concerning
the Lord Jesus Christ, so Mark can write it any way he jolly
good and well wants to write it. He can write it in a beautiful
play, and I love it. So, I think you should love it
as much as I do. Notice, too, what the word Gospel
presupposes. Good news. It presupposes that
it happened. It presupposes that it occurred
in time and space. In its secular context, or its
secular use before it is used in the Christian context, it
was one who, get this, brought good news to someone else. And
that good news usually occurred in history. Like, if a war, if
a country had conquered another nation, They would send out messengers
to tell them that they've conquered this nation. They're bringing
forth good news. And certainly now it has been
employed for Christians concerning the Lord Jesus Christ. Certainly
His life, His death, His resurrection. The Apostle Paul gives us a beautiful
example in 1 Corinthians chapter 15. A beautiful, excuse me, definition
of the gospel. in 1 Corinthians chapter 15 and
how it has been applied to the Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians
chapter 15 at verse 1. Now I remind you, brothers, of
the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which
you stand, and by which you are being saved. If you hold fast
to the word I preached to you, unless you believed in vain,
for I delivered to you as of first importance what I also
received, that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the
Scriptures, that He was buried, that He was raised on the third
day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas,
then to the twelve. As I've already said, how does
Paul define the Gospel here? He's involving the death and
the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. Certainly the Gospel
encompasses, as it's applied to Christianity, the life, the
death, and the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ, not just
the beginning, not just the end, but the whole. And certainly,
as I've said already, it presupposes history. It presupposes that
it happened. It's amazing that both in the
secular realm and the Christian realm, people question whether
or not Jesus actually came, whether or not he actually lived, whether
or not he actually died. And people with this questioning
don't even go to the primary examples that we have. They go
to the ones that stand outside of it as if they can help us
understand who the God of the Bible is, who the Christ of the
Bible is. That's wrong. I took a class
called The Life and Teachings of Jesus Christ, and thinking
I'd be learning about the life and teachings of Jesus Christ,
but it wasn't. It was a quest to find out whether
or not Jesus actually lived and died and rose again. could have
saved $2,000 if we just opened a lexicon. Because the word,
as I've said, good news, presupposes that it came, that it happened,
that the Lord did die and rise again. If anyone questions whether
or not the Lord Jesus did come, he did because that's what gospel
means. That's what gospel presupposes,
and we must understand that. So if anyone questions whether
or not our Savior lived, our Savior died, our Savior rose
again, just give them a lexicon and tell them what the Gospel
actually means. Listen to this theologian, one
Richard Baukham, concerning this idea that the Gospels are eyewitness
testimonies. Like any other part of history,
the Jesus who lived in first century Palestine is knowable
only through the evidence that has survived They didn't have
iPhones back then. They didn't have YouTube back
then. You couldn't just whip out your phone when Jesus is
healing Jairus' daughter and view it and then post it on YouTube
and people can come and look at it. They didn't have it then.
They didn't have satellites floating in space where they could take
any picture they jolly good and well wanted to. They did it the
means that they had, and what was that? Word of mouth. And I think we see the Lord's
grace in that we have not just three witnesses, but four witnesses
concerning the Lord Jesus Christ. It shows that we have thick skulls,
and not only do we have three witnesses, but we have four concerning
this Lord Jesus Christ. Another comment from Baukham.
or Bacham, Gospels should be understood as eyewitness testimony,
which enhances its historicity, thus providing an appropriate
means of access to the historical Jesus. I don't need to read Josephus. I don't need to read Pliny, the
so-called external sources concerning the Lord Jesus Christ. I just
need to read the Bible. I need to read the Gospels. That's
where I need to find out who the Lord Jesus is. And when someone
questions whether or not Jesus lived, just point them to the
Gospels. Point them to the record that
we have with Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. And think about an
everyday example. When we tell someone something
that's happening in our life, it's probably because it did
happen. When someone says, like pregnancy, for example, they
announce that they're pregnant, do we ever think that they're
speaking metaphorically? Do we ever think that they're,
oh, that's a great metaphor for being full of life. Totally. That's exactly how we think when
we think concerning pregnancy. No, we usually think that there's
a bun growing in the oven, don't we? It's just common sense. And certainly we do have this
good news. Certainly it did occur. Certainly it did happen. And
we need to understand something by implication with this. Good
news presupposes bad news. Good news presupposes bad news. And what's the bad news? We've
sinned against the Lord God. We've sinned against a thrice
holy God. We have transgressed His law
and thus deserve punishment. And if we expect punishment from
a finite judge, and we receive a finite punishment
concerning that, whether it's a fine or going to prison, how
much more for a perfect judge? How much more for a perfect holy
God shall we receive eternal punishment? Which highlights
what? The grace of our Lord God. It's
not the absolute judgment concerning the Lord Jesus Christ, as if
He sent down some minions to come and wipe out all of humanity.
He sent His Son. He sent the Lord Jesus Christ
to die in our stead. He could have judged us, and
He would have been just in doing that, but He's also just in sending
His perfect Son, who bears the wrath of God upon Him. Praise
the Lord God that we have one who came, who did what Adam could
not do, when Adam transgressed the law of God, because Christ
is certainly the archetype for Adam. He did what Adam could
not do. Adam did not live that law in
perfection, and here comes Christ who does. This brings me to my
second point concerning the Gospel. Notice its object. The object
of the Gospel is Jesus Christ, the Son of God. R.T. France highlights that this is
certainly referring to the Lord Jesus' title, not necessarily
his social standing. We see his social standing in
verse 9, but Mark wants you to see something. This Jesus Christ,
this one who is to come, comes in Jesus of Nazareth. That's
what he wants you to see. This is what the book is about,
and this is what the object of the gospel is. It is Jesus Christ. Christ simply means Christ, Messiah,
Anointed One. The One who will save His people
from their sins. It is a blessed truth to know
that God sent this One who could save His people from our sins.
And notice His identity. The Son of God. What's Mark claiming
here? That Jesus is God. He is the
deity. Matthew, as we've already seen
in Mark 2 verse 7, who can forgive sins but God alone? What's Jesus
convicted of when he is sent to the cross? He's convicted
of blasphemy. In Mark 14, 62, 63, I'm just
going to turn there. Remember it. Oops. And Jesus, he's before the council,
before the high priest, and this is what they ask him. 14 verse
61. But he remained silent and made
no answer. Again, the high priest asked
him, Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? And Jesus
said, I am. And you will see the Son of Man
seated at the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of
heaven. And the high priest tore his garments and said, What further
witness do we need? You have heard his blasphemy.
What is your decision?" This Jesus is God. And if we weren't
thick already, if we couldn't understand what Mark is trying
to say, John explicitly provides the answer for us. John chapter
5 at verse 18. This is why the Jews were seeking
more, all the more to kill him. Because not only was he breaking
the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own father, making
himself what? Equal with God. He is equal with God. The Lord Jesus Christ, when we
think of His identity, He is the God-Man. The God-Man. Not so much that His Godhood
enhances His humanity, or that His humanity decreases His divinity. He is just simply the God-Man. And certainly, as much as that's...
I know that's hard to wrap our heads around, But it makes perfect
sense in light of redemptive history. Who has sinned against
the Lord God Most High? Man has. Who, what are we supposed
to do? Fulfill the law in perfection.
We can't do it. It must be God that does it.
If Jesus Christ is not God, then we have no rock to stand upon. So what if Jesus came? So what if he's just some sort
of wise sage? We could read about other sages
if we wanted to. But no, this Jesus Christ is
the Son of God, and we must know that, we must understand that. And I want to make, as I've already
said, this is the object concerning the Gospel. This highlights something
very important about the gospel itself. I've heard it said in
other churches that I've attended to in other places concerning
people's definition of the gospel, and we have to have a proper
understanding of who the object is. People define it sometimes
in this way. They define it as if we need
to show the gospel, as if we need to, as Saint Francis of
Assisi said, Preach the gospel and when necessary use words?
That's wrong. It's preach the gospel and always
use words. In the book of Acts, do we see
the apostles going to an orphanage? As much as that's a good thing
and being kind to the poor, and we should do that, It's not the
gospel. Me being kind to someone isn't
going to save them from their sins. It's them knowing their
sin and believing on the Lord Jesus Christ that's going to
save them from their sins. And certainly the Apostle Paul
said anyone who gets the gospel wrong should be anathema. Forgive
me for saying... I'm not. I'm not. Don't forgive
me for saying this. It's heresy. It's heresy. You know why? Because
that makes the gospel man-centered instead of God-centered. It makes
it about our benevolent acts of goodness than the benevolent
acts of the Lord Jesus Christ. And certainly that is wrong,
that is wretched, that is not the gospel. The gospel is about
our Lord Jesus Christ. And listen to Ryle's quote concerning
the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ. The divinity of Christ
is the citadel and keep of Christianity. Let believers cling to this doctrine
with jealous watchfulness. With it, they stand upon a rock. Without it, they have nothing
solid beneath their feet. Our hearts are weak. Our sins
are many. We need a Redeemer who is able
to save to the uttermost. and deliver from the wrath to
come. We have such a Redeemer in Jesus Christ. He is the mighty
God. What's Mark wants you to see?
He wants you to see that this Jesus Christ is the mighty one. He is the authoritative one,
and He can save you from your sins. We don't have a weak God.
We have a strong God. We have the all-powerful God
who can do that. And by way of some concerning
the gospel, listen to Calvin. The gospel, therefore, is a public
exhibition of the Son of God manifested in the flesh to deliver
a ruined world and to restore men from death to life. The gospel
is the life, the death, the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. Anything
other than that is heresy and it's wrong. Now let us move forward
into the Gospel, excuse me, the beginning of the Gospel foretold. And certainly this, excuse me,
certainly going back to the idea of the Son of God, Christ claiming
to be God, certainly that is expounded more in verses 2 and
3. But anyway, the beginning of the Gospel foretold. Mark
wants his hearers to see this good news concerning Jesus Christ
begins with the fulfillment of the Old Testament in John the
Baptizer. Look at verse 2, as it is written. I just want to make a comment
of this word, of these three little words, as it is written. If you want a good defense against
dispensationalism, against the idea that the Old Testament is
no longer binding, just use these words. Certainly, I'm going to
go into a bit of Greek here, but I think it's because the
English doesn't bring out the force that's behind this. This tense here in the Greek,
and it is written, is certainly a past action that's been completed,
it's done, but it still has ongoing effects for the future. One grammarian
highlighting this notes that it refers to the regulative and
authoritative character of the document. There are two other
tenses in Greek that refer to something that's completed that
doesn't have ongoing effects. There's another tense, so there's
another one that refers to events that started in the past that
continue on into the future. This tense means this. It's finished. It's complete, because it has
been written, the writing of the book is done, and now it
applies, and now it has authoritative authority now. Certainly the
Old Testament is authoritative, and certainly we should be reading
it and understanding it. Because, as we'll see, it points
to the Lord Jesus Christ. It points to Him. It points to
the one who will crush the head of the serpent. It's a blessed
book to read, and a blessed book to understand. Notice it is written
in Isaiah the prophet. Now if you're paying attention,
you'll know that verse 2 isn't from Isaiah the prophet. It's
from Malachi chapter 3. Chapter 3 at verse 1. I would
still render it Isaiah the prophet. Certainly other manuscripts have
the prophets, but a lot of the commentators are okay with Isaiah
the prophet. Most of the old ones have Isaiah
the Prophet, and the majority of the manuscripts have Isaiah
the Prophet. And the commentators say this concerning it, that
he is the more prominent one. And certainly if it is written
for a Gentile audience, What prophets do they mean if it's
just the prophets? They don't really have a platform
for which or through which they can search out these prophecies. So certainly I would render it
Isaiah the prophet. And notice Malachi's messenger
in the second part of verse two. Behold, I send my messenger before
your face who will prepare your way. Notice who the sender is. If you want, you can turn to
Malachi chapter 3 to see this. Notice who the sender is. Behold, pay attention, I send. Who's speaking? It's Yahweh of
Israel. It's the Lord God. The Lord God
is sending who? his messenger. And notice, too,
that this I send highlights something very important. That God is the
author of salvation. Doesn't it? He is the one who
is sending this messenger to prepare the way of who? To prepare
the way of me. In Mark, chapters 2, it says,
prepare the way before your face, referring to the Lord Jesus Christ.
But here in Malachi chapter 3, verse 1, he's referring to himself. Again, what's Mark trying to
highlight? That this Jesus Christ is God. That this Jesus Christ
is God, and the one who comes before him is preparing his way,
and we must be ready to understand, or be ready to see that one. And notice, secondly, concerning
Malachi's messenger, the messenger himself. I'm going to give it
away. It's John. John the Baptist is
the messenger. And notice what the messenger
will do in Malachi chapter 3. Verse 2. Who can endure the day
of his coming? Who can stand when he appears?
For he is like a refiner's fire and like a fuller soap. He will
sit as a refiner and purifier of silver, and He will purify
the sons of Levi and refine them like gold and silver, and they
will bring offerings in the righteousness to the Lord. Then the offering
of Judah and Jerusalem will be pleasing to the Lord, as in the
days of old and as in former years. Then I will draw near
to you for judgment. I will be a swift witness against
the sorcerers, against the adulterers, against those who swear falsely,
against those who oppress the hired worker and his wages, the
widow and the fatherless, against those who thrust aside the sojourner. And do not fear me, says the
Lord of hosts." What's he going to do? He's going to refine,
he's going to purify, and judge. Listen to Gil concerning this.
The work of this messenger was no other than to declare the
long-expected Messiah was born, that he would quickly make his
public appearance in Israel, that the kingdom of heaven or
the kingdom of the Messiah was at hand, and that it became the
Jews to repent of their sins and believe. What's preparing
the way of the Lord? He's preaching Christ. He's preaching
repent and turn to the Lord Jesus Christ. He's refining the people. He's refining Israel to prepare
them for the coming of the one who can save them from their
sins. And notice, as I've said already,
the Messiah. In Malachi 3, he says, I will
prepare the way before me. I will prepare the way before
me. I will prepare the way before
Yahweh. Jesus Christ really is God. I
know I'm redundant with that, but Mark really wants his hearers
to see and understand that. This one who comes is preparing
the way of the Lord. Even though that this passage,
Mark 1 to 4, is about really the messenger, it's really about
the Messiah as well. It's really about glorifying
the Messiah. It's really about the one who
will come, prepare his way, and then decrease so that people
can see the Lord Jesus Christ. And as I've said already, I think
this highlights that God is both the author and the executor of
salvation. He's both the one that plans
it, and executes it. He is the one that plans it in
time with himself and executes it in the life, the death, and
the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. It's really a beautiful
thing to behold. Salvation truly is of the Lord. It is not by our good deeds or
our good intentions, but right standing with the Lord is based
on the finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ. And I think one
thing that France highlights that I didn't see the connection
with is the connection between Malachi 3 and Exodus 23. In Exodus 23, the Lord God says,
Behold, I will send my angel before you to prepare your way.
It's at Mount Sinai. He's speaking to the people of
Israel. They've come out of Egypt. And he said, I will prepare your
way into Canaan. And notice that's physical Israel. Now what's the Lord? Now who's
preparing? Now look what the Lord's doing. He's preparing
the way for spiritual Israel. Who is the Lord Jesus? He is
Israel. He is the true Israel who can
do what Israel couldn't. He can fulfill the law in perfection
in the way that Israel could not do. And that's truly a blessed
thing to see, a blessed thing to understand concerning this
messenger. Another thing to highlight concerning
Malachi, that this was some 400 years before the coming of John
the Baptist. We flip through our Bibles and
all of a sudden, oh, there he is, John's here, but it's been
400 years since the Lord has spoken. This truly is a wonderful
time. It's a blessed time in history.
It's certainly... The people necessarily hearing
this would not have understood that, or within the book would
not have understood that, but certainly Mark wants his hearers
to see that. He wants his hearers to see that this messenger is
in fulfillment with not one, but two prophets, which is where
we go to next. I call him Isaiah's wilderness
man, Mark verse 3, from Isaiah chapter 40, verse 3. Isaiah 40 verse 3, the voice
of one crying in the wilderness, prepare the way of the Lord,
make his paths straight. Now if you know Isaiah 39, we
know that the Lord God promises destruction of Jerusalem through
Babylon. What comes right after? Grace. One commentator who comments
on Isaiah highlights that there are three voices highlighting
the grace that the Lord is bestowing or promising for his people.
Does God not do this throughout the scripture? Adam sinned. What's
he promised? The coming of the seed who will
crush the head of the serpent. What happens in between Genesis
11 and Genesis 12? There's the people of Babylon.
They want to be like the Lord God. God judges them. What happens
in 12? He calls Abraham. He calls Abraham, saying, I will
bless all the nations through you. The Lord's grace is certainly
evident in this passage, in Isaiah chapter 40, verse 3. And look
at the voice. I'm going to give it away again.
The voice is John. The voice is John, and again,
I think Mark is trying to make that clear with verse 4. It is
John. And notice he's crying out, he's
preaching. What have we said concerning
the gospel? It's something that must be spoken, it must be uttered,
we must use words. What's he doing? He's preaching
it. He's proclaiming it. He's preaching repentance, he's
preaching turn, and he's preaching the one who will save them from
their sins. And note also, too, the wilderness.
Again, France made the connection with Exodus 20, 23 with Malachi,
highlighting the wilderness connection. It's more explicit in verse 3,
the wilderness, which is reminiscent of what? Israel's testing time
for 40 years in the wilderness after they've come up out of
Egypt. France makes this comment. The
voice in the wilderness introduces a great vision of restoration,
which is followed by the recurrent theme of a new exodus, a new
beginning in a wilderness transformed by the renewing power of Israel's
God. It is a time of hope. It is a
time of restoration. And certainly, as I've said already,
it's pointing forward to the true Israel who can do what Israel
could not do. And notice too, both Malachi
and Isaiah highlight that they both prepare the way of the Lord. Again, in Malachi 3, he highlights,
you prepare the way before me. In Isaiah 40 he says, prepare
the way of the Lord. Certainly the commentators think
that Lord definitely means God, but I think the Hebrew provides
a much better rendering, or I think we see the force better when
we read it in the Hebrew. It's the personal name for God
in the Hebrew. It's Yahweh. It's not just some
Lord, it is Yahweh. So again, this Jesus Christ is
the Son of God, His messenger, His forerunner, is prophesied
in Malachi, and prophesied in Isaiah concerning the coming
of Yahweh, concerning the coming of the Lord God. May I say this
by way of indirect application concerning prophecy? Does this
not show us a template for biblical prophecy, what it looks like,
who it concerns? Unfortunately, in modern Christendom
today, people are more enamored with hearing from the Lord in
an audible way, in some sort of spiritual existential adventure
where they float on up to heaven and float back down. in a way
that they hear from God, speak to them, and then they speak
that to other people. They call that prophecy. And
it's usually concerning specific people, and it's usually concerning
something about their life, concerning whether or not they have a good,
whether or not they can have their best life now or whatever,
that they provide encouragement for them in some sort of way.
That's not the case with biblical prophecy if you look at it. I
think before we even discuss whether or not gifts of revelation
have ceased, I think it's important to question whether or not what
we call prophecy, and by extension what we call tongues, is biblical
in nature. Biblical prophecy centers on
and around Yahweh. whether it is foretelling His
wrath for sins, or His coming mercy upon the sinner, and by
extension, primarily the Lord Jesus Christ. Prophecy is God-centered. It isn't some sort of way that
we can have some sort of wonderful encouragement. I can't look at
you and see a banner over your head and think of a word and
call that prophecy. That's not it. Biblical prophecy
is concerned with Yahweh of Israel. The last thing I want to highlight
is the beginning of the Gospel fulfilled in Mark chapter 4.
As I've said, the messenger and the voice are John. Does this
not highlight the faithfulness of our Lord God, that he can
do what he says he would do, and even by extension, the Lord
could have had the plan to save his sinners all along, but he
didn't provide little steps or signs along the way to give his
people hope. Right after they sin, he says,
I'm gonna send, the seed of the woman will crush the seed of
the serpent. In Deuteronomy, he highlights
that there's a prophet coming who will come like Moses, In
Isaiah 53 we have the coming of the suffering servant. And
here we see that these men, Malachi and Isaiah, are giving people
something to hope for. They're giving them a prophecy
or one to look forward to. And certainly this comes in the
form of John. Verse 4, He came, John the baptizer. Now this word came, there are
two words that can mean come in Greek. There are ones referring
to location, as if I come to church and leave from church,
and there are others referring to whether or not I come into
existence. I just pop up, or whether, yeah, whether or not
I come into existence. And I think it's better rendered
John assumed his character. We have the character described
in 2 and 3, and John comes and assumes his character, which
highlights the blessedness and the beauty of the Bible. It is
written just so mesmerizingly, isn't it? Certainly we have the
description of the One, in two and three, and then his appearance.
I just, I love movies, so I picture a movie, I hear this deep voice
going, the beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
As it is written in the prophet Isaiah, Behold, I send my messenger
before your face, who will prepare your way. The voice of one crying
in the wilderness, prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths
straight. And the screen jumps on. There's
a picture of John. He's the one who assumes the
character. It's the same word used in verse 9 concerning the
Lord Jesus Christ saying what? He assumes his character as the
Messiah. He assumes his character. Certainly
he is the Son of God prior to this, but he's assuming his role
at this point in redemptive history. And notice too, some translations
concerning the idea of baptizing or baptizer, render either baptizing
or baptizer, excuse me. I would render it, John, he came,
the baptizer, not baptizing. Certainly we have mention of
another John in chapter 1. It's John the son of Zebedee.
And as I've said already, it's a Gentile audience. They would
not have known who John the Baptist is. So certainly I think it is
John the Baptizer which highlights that it's a title concerning
or describing John. And notice, too, the fulfillment,
what John does. He comes in the wilderness, fulfilling
what? Both Malachi and Isaiah. He's fulfilling both of those
prophecies. And certainly, I think this highlights
something as well. Mark is concerned with demonstrating
that the gospel did not start kind of ad hoc. It didn't start
kind of willy-nilly, but it's orchestrated in the wisdom of
God, and it's executed by the will and power of God. It is
a blessed thing to see, it is a blessed thing to concern, or
to understand. John, or Mark wants us here to
see that this John, the baptizer, is the fulfillment of both the
messenger and the voice. And notice what he does. He cries
out, he proclaims a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness
of sins. He preaches, and preaches a baptism
of repentance. Now certainly this looks like
baptism precedes repentance. That is not the case at all.
Repentance is describing something about the baptism. It's probably
better rendered a baptism characterized by repentance. It's describing
something about the baptism. One of the prerequisites, if
you will, for baptism is repentance. Baptism is not a saving ordinance. Otherwise, that would make it
by the work performed and not by the grace received. It would
be legalistic in its nature, and that's not the case at all.
It is a sign of one's repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. And France has a comment concerning
this idea, which is found in the works of first century historian
Josephus. John presented baptism, according
to Josephus, as meaningful not in itself, but only if preceded
by a commitment to repentance. Baptism should not then be used
to gain pardon for their sins, but was merely a bodily mark
of purity. What's John doing? He's preaching,
turn from your sins, turn away, and believe on the Lord Jesus
Christ. And by way of application, what
does this highlight about the ordinance of baptism, especially
for us Baptists? Repentance precedes that. Repentance simply means a change
of mind, change of principle. We see our sin, we realize it's
wrong, we see the Savior, our thoughts change concerning Him,
and we believe on Him. It's certainly a child or an
infant can't repent It's a baptism of repentance. Repentance precedes
the act or rite of baptism. And notice the purpose of it. For the forgiveness, so that
people might, excuse me, repentance for the forgiveness of sins.
Praise the Lord God, as I've said already, that He comes to
forgive us of our sins, our sins that we have transgressed His
law, we have sinned against Him, and certainly He forgives us
for that. That we were called to repent,
to see our sin, that we might believe on the Lord, and we will
be forgiven in the Lord Jesus Christ. I just want to say a
quote from Gundry concerning the connection between verses
2 and 3 and the appearance of John in verse 4. John's appearance
on the scene matches the sending of God's messenger. John's activity
of baptizing matches the messengers preparing the way of the Lord.
The location in the wilderness matches the location of one crying
in the wilderness. John's preaching matches the
crying out of the voice. The baptism of repentance, which
starts with confession of sins and ends in their forgiveness,
matches the making ready of the Lord's way and the making straight
of his paths. The detailedness of these match-ups
adds great weight to Mark's emphasis on God's working out His plan. Praise the Lord that God can
execute His plan in history. Praise the Lord that He had a
plan to save people from their sins, and He deserves glory and
praise and honour for those things. And I just want to close by way
of application. The first thing is this. The
Gospel is something we must know and we must preach. We must have
an accurate, precise definition of what it is so that we can
accurately proclaim it. That's for all of us believers. If we do claim to believers,
we must for sure know it. The second point I want to highlight
is for believers. Certainly we are saved by grace
alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, But we must certainly
live in a manner worthy of the gospel. We must walk in a manner
consistent with it. Paul highlights this in Philippians
chapter 1. In Jude chapter 4, Jude highlights
what a characteristic of a false prophet is. It's one who perverts
the grace of God into licentiousness. who perverts the grace of God
into anything goes. What does Paul say in Romans
chapter 6? What shall we say then? Shall we keep on saying
that grace may abound? By no means. And certainly with this walking
in the manor, how do we do that? It's the normative use of the
moral law, the normative use of those Ten Commandments. It's
a pattern of living, or excuse me, it's a normative use, it's
a pattern provides a pattern of sanctification, a pattern
through which we can follow. So certainly when we do seek
to live out the law, because we have been saved, not to save
ourselves, we must think of those ten things for sure. Do we love
the Lord God with all our hearts? Do we have false idols? Do we
take His name in vain? Do we remember the Sabbath? Do
we honor our fathers and mothers? Do we murder? Do we commit adultery? Do we steal? Do we lie? Do we
covet? Certainly we must think of those
things. And certainly we should praise
the Lord God that we have one to call upon who lived out the
struggles we face without sin. The Lord Jesus Christ is described
in Hebrews 12 as the author and the perfecter of our faith. Certainly we can look to one
who did live the law in perfection, who did what we could not and
died as that perfect sacrifice for our sins. And my last way
of application is for unbelievers. You need to believe on this.
You must believe on this. Your soul depends on it. There are some of you out there
who, despite the definition of the gospel, that it does presuppose
that it occurred in history, still do not believe. And this
is because of our sin-stained hearts. It's because of the thick,
dark blood that courses through your veins. Certainly, as believers,
we've understood this. We've been washed by the blood
of the Lamb. But if you are not a believer today, you are sin-stained. Your blood is dark and you must
turn from it and believe on this one. I'm going to tell you this
right off the bat. There's going to be punishment
on the Day of Judgment, and the Lord is going to be just in one
of two ways. He's either going to punish the
sinner for eternity, or He is going to punish the Savior. Praise the Lord that He has punished
the Savior already, and those who have believed have believed
on Him. And those who do not, I would
exhort you now to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be
saved. I just want to close with this
comment that Ryle had concerning the Lord Jesus Christ, and this
comment has more to do with the entire introduction, but it is
a blessed thing to think about. Let us ask ourselves as we leave
the passage how much we know by practical experience of the
truths which John preached. What do we think of Christ? Have
we felt our need of him and fled to him for peace? Is he king
over our hearts and all the things to our souls? What do we think
of the Holy Spirit? Has he wrought a saving work
in our hearts? Has he renewed and changed them?
Has he made us partakers of the divine nature? Life or death
depend on our answer to these questions. And if anyone does
not have the spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ
and you shall be saved. I'll close with prayer. Dear
Heavenly Father, we thank you for this day, Lord God. We thank
you for the gospel, that it did happen in time and space, Lord
God, and it did concern the Lord Jesus Christ, that he did live
the law in perfection, something we could not do. And we praise
you, Lord God, that we can call upon him, that we can look to
the one who did live the law justly and righteously, Lord
God. And Lord God, we just thank you so much that you are faithful
to execute what you will do in time and space, Lord God, how
you provided Israel with prophecies concerning the coming one, that
you would give them hope, Lord God, and certainly we do have
hope that the Lord Jesus Christ is coming again, because you
are faithful, Lord God. And Lord God, we just pray that
you would go with us this day, Lord God, that we might think
the things concerning the Lord Jesus Christ, that we might know
Him accurately, Lord God, that we might be able to accurately
proclaim what is right and true concerning Him, Lord God. Forgive
us when we do not. Forgive us when we sin against
You, Lord God. We pray that Your name would
be glorified this day, and that You would be lifted high. Amen.