The Attempted Murder of the Good Shepherd
Sermons on John
You can turn with me in your Bibles to the book of John. We're working our way through John's gospel, coming to the end of chapter 10. So our focus this morning will be verses 31 to 32, I'm sorry, 42, but I'll read beginning in verse 22. So John's Gospel, beginning in chapter 10 at verse 22. Now it was the Feast of Dedication in Jerusalem, and it was winter. And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon's porch. Then the Jews surrounded him and said to him, How long do you keep us in doubt? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly. Jesus answered them, I told you and you do not believe the works that I do in my father's name. They bear witness of me, but you do not believe because you are not of my sheep. As I said to you, my sheep hear my voice and I know them and they follow me and I give them eternal life and they shall never perish. Neither shall anyone snatch them out of my hand. My father who has given them to me is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of my father's hand. I and my father are one." Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. Jesus answered them, many good works I have shown you from my father, for which of those works do you stone me? The Jews answered him, saying, for good work we do not stone you, but for blasphemy, and because you, being a man, make yourself God. Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, you are gods? If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken, do you say of him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, you are blaspheming, because I said, I am the Son of God? If I do not do the works of my Father, do not believe me. But if I do, though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in me and I in him.' Therefore they sought again to seize him, but he escaped out of their hand. And he went away again beyond the Jordan to the place where John was baptizing at first. And there he stayed. Then many came to him and said, John performed no sign. But all the things that John spoke about this man were true. And many believed in him there. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our gracious God and our Holy Father, we thank you for this Lord's Day. We thank you for the house of God and for the privilege to gather with the people of God to worship you. As we come to the Father through the Son and the power of the Holy Spirit, we pray that you would be exalted and glorified and praised. And as we look at your holy scriptures now, as we consider the life and ministry of our blessed Savior, may the Spirit guide us and direct us, may we learn wondrous things from your truth. And may you help us, Lord God, to appreciate afresh the Savior King, that one who is altogether lovely and chief among ten thousand, that one in whom there is forgiveness and a righteousness that avails with you. And God, for any and all who've come here this morning, dead in their trespasses and sins, we pray that you would awaken them, that the Holy Spirit would cause them to be alive, cause them to be regenerated, cause them to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, that they may have everlasting life. Forgive us now for all of our sin and all of our unrighteousness, and we pray in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen. As I said, as we come to the end of this particular chapter, we'll remember that Jesus uses two figures of speech to teach concerning his person. He highlights the fact that he is the door of the sheep. No one comes into that fold except through him. And then he highlights the fact that he is the good shepherd. And when he does that, he is not devoid of a context. When Jesus speaks about being the good shepherd, It ought to cause us to reflect upon those shepherd passages in the Old Testament. Psalm 23, for instance, the Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. The promise through the prophet Jeremiah and then the prophet Ezekiel that God would send a Davidic shepherd to save his people from their sins. And so, as we follow through the narrative, we see that the religious leaders in Jerusalem, the religious leaders here in the Holy City, they resist Him. They reject Him every step of the way. He emphasizes His unique relation to the Father, and instead of them bowing down and confessing Him as Lord and Savior, they pick up stones to throw at Him. And that is precisely the context that we're in now, beginning in verses 31 to 42. I want to look first at the revelation of His glory, just a reminder of verse 30. Secondly, the attempted murder by the Jews in verses 31 to 39. And then finally, His ministry in the Transjordan in verses 40 to 42. But by way of review, with reference to the revelation of His glory, look back for just a moment in verse 25. I told you and you do not believe, they asked him the question in verse 24, how long do you keep us in doubt? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly. He then asserts the fact that he had told them plainly, he had told them clearly, and not only had he told them and shared with them the unique relation that he bore to his father, but also the good works that he did, the signs, the wonders, the miracles, the fact that he healed this man in chapter 9 who had been born blind. And then as he continues down this particular section, he highlights the fact that though they reject, there are nevertheless those who receive. We see that in our section this morning. But notice what he says in verse 26. You do not believe because you are not of my sheep, as I said to you. It's very important that we get that. He is highlighting the absolute sovereignty of God. He's not saying, you're not my sheep because you don't believe. You don't believe because you're not my sheep. In Acts 13, 48, we see as many as had been appointed to eternal life believe the things that were spoken. by the Apostle Paul in the synagogue in Pisidian Antioch. So the Lord Christ understands and acknowledges and finds great comfort in the fact that the Father is sovereign over these things. So they resist, they reject because they're not of his sheep. But then notice in verse 27, my sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me, and I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish. Neither shall anyone snatch them out of my hand. And then he says, my father who has given them to me is greater than all. And no one is able to snatch them out of my father's hand. And then he makes this glorious declaration in verse 30, I and my father are one. Now they obviously understood what he was saying because they pick up stones to throw at him for what they perceive to be the crime of blasphemy. Now, when he says that I and my father are one, he's not simply suggesting that they're one in purpose. that they're one in function, that they're one in terms of holding on to the elect saved sinner. But rather, as Cyril says with the word one, he is referring to the identity of substance. And Matthew Poole says not only in counsel and will, but in nature, power, and essence. So he is claiming to be the son of God in a unique way. So that's the basis or the context for which we then see the attempted murder by the Jews in verses 31 to 39. Notice verse 31. It says, then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. This was a capital offense in Israel. Leviticus chapter 24, specifically at verses 10 and following indicate that this was a capital crime. To commit blasphemy in Old Covenant Israel was to engage not only in the sin of idolatry or the sin of rejection of the lawful authority of Yahweh, but it was an act of treason. To disown, as it were, the living and the true God in that particular body politic was sedition, and therefore it was a criminal offense and it was punished by stoning. But notice what these men don't do. They don't engage in due process. So the same Torah, the same Old Testament, the same Pentateuch of the same law that demands the execution of a blasphemer also demands due process. It demands two or three witnesses. It demands a particular procedure. And they have descended from that, and they've engaged in mob violence. Now, these are probably representatives of the Sanhedrin. Well, just because they're with the Sanhedrin doesn't mean that they can disregard the lawful process that is involved and encompassed by God in terms of justice. These men have descended to the level of mob violence. They take up stones to throw at Him. And then notice what John tells us here in verse 31. Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. This wasn't their first rodeo. Go back to John chapter five, after Jesus healed that man at the pool of Bethesda. We notice in 5.16, for this reason, the Jews persecuted Jesus and sought to kill him because he had done these things on the Sabbath. Again, another capital offense. But Jesus answered them, my father has been working until now and I have been working. Therefore, the Jews sought all the more to kill him, because he not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was his father, making himself equal with God. So as far as they were concerned, Sabbath-breaking and blasphemy. This assertion that he himself was equal with God demanded that they execute him with stones. Again, brethren, you search the Old Testament in vain to just see the descent into mob violence. You see the emphasis. Deuteronomy 17, Deuteronomy 19. There is a demand for two or three witnesses, especially in a capital offense. In a capital crime, you can't just pick up stones and throw them at people. What they do in Stephen's case, in Acts chapter 7, is a great breach of the law of God. You can't do this. Just because you're convinced that something is right, you have Bible verses to prove it, you need to engage in due process. And these men have descended to the level of mob violence. Notice in John 7, there's a hesitancy on the part of the Savior about going to the feast because of the fact that they want to kill Him. Notice in John 7, 1, after these things, Jesus walked in Galilee, for He did not want to walk in Judea because the Jews sought to kill Him. When he does eventually arrive, notice what he says in verse 19. Did not Moses give you the law, yet none of you keeps the law? Why do you seek to kill me? These men were outraged at the claims made by the Lord Jesus Christ. You see it at the end of John chapter 8 as well. When he claims, or when he asserts the reality that your father Abraham, verse 56, rejoiced to see my day, he sought and was glad. Then the Jews said to him, you are not yet 50 years old, and have you seen Abraham? Jesus said to them, Most assuredly I say to you, before Abraham was, I am. Then they took up stones to throw at him. But Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by. So in John 10.31, again, this isn't the first attempt. This isn't the first try. This isn't the first effort on their part to eradicate or to eliminate the Son of God. Now notice the question concerning the motive of the Jews posed by our Lord. Verse 32, He addresses them specifically. Why are you doing what you're doing? This is unrighteous, this is ungodly, this is unholy. You're claiming to be those who are upholding the law of God and all the while trashing the law of God. And I think he guides them by the hand, as it were, throughout the remainder of this section, to underscore the authority of Scripture, the relevance of Scripture, the abiding sufficiency of Scripture in all matters. So he asks them in verse 32, many good works I have shown you from my Father. For which of those works do you stone me? That's a good question. And we see in John's gospel the evidentiary value of the signs. Remember, the gospel ends on that note. These things are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing in his name, you may have everlasting life. So the signs are given as causes, or rather effects, to lead us to the cause. If he is able to do these things that are unique to God, then he is uniquely God. He is God's Son. He is the sent one from the Father. Now notice how they answer this. They don't deny his works. Notice in verse 33, the Jews answered him saying, for good work we do not stone you. They couldn't. He really did heal that man that was born blind. Remember, there's an inextricable link between chapters nine and 10. We're not supposed to forget what happens in chapter nine. There was a man born blind and Jesus heals him. There were other signs and wonders that Jesus undertook in John's gospel, seven of them in total. The synoptics record many more. In fact, John says that in John 20, many other signs Jesus did, but these are written for a particular purpose. So we notice specifically that they cannot deny his works. Notice what charge they level. For a good work we do not stone you, but for blasphemy. Again, Leviticus 24.10 demands the execution of those who blaspheme in terms of the body politic. And then notice the rationale they give. But for blasphemy, and because you being a man, make yourself God. So the rejection of the Old Testament that prophesied a divine Messiah. I mentioned last week, brethren, you cannot deny at the literary level that the Old Covenant or the Old Testament scriptures promise a divine Messiah. Yahweh said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies your footstool. No creature sits at the right hand of Yahweh. Psalm 45, we have that ascription concerning the Son of God, and it says, My God. You have the emphasis in the prophet Isaiah in chapter 9, verses 6 and 7, concerning the coming King and His kingdom, and it calls Him Everlasting Father. It calls Him Prince of Peace. It calls Him Mighty God. You have that statement concerning him in Micah 5, 2, that his goings forth are from of old, from everlasting. That does not define, describe, or characterize a creature. So the Old Testament Scriptures prophesied a divine Messiah. The divine Messiah has come to them. He has taken on our humanity. We know that. John 1.1. In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. He's come. He's arrived. The time is now at this particular juncture, and yet they resist that. They reject that. So they don't hold to the old covenant scriptures, but they also don't go by the witness of their own eyes. He's done these works, he's done these signs, he's made these claims, and yet they resist him, and they reject him, and they assert rather that he's committing blasphemy, and they pick up stones to throw at him. Now notice the refutation of the Jews by our Lord in verses 34 to 38. There's three things we ought to consider here. First, the appeal to Scripture. Second, the argument from Scripture. And then finally, the application in this context. And this is where we're going to spend most of our time this morning. Notice the appeal to Scripture. Verse 33, "...for a good work we do not stone you, but for blasphemy, and because you, being a man, make yourself God." Jesus answered them. Now he appeals to the scripture. They think they're acting in accordance with scripture. They think that they're the righteous ones, that they're the holy ones. Remember when we looked at the previous part of this particular chapter, when Jesus describes these men as thieves and as robbers and as those who kill and destroy. They nevertheless parade themselves under the guise of sanctimony. It's kind of like what you see today, the self-righteous people, the ones that are engaged in great lawlessness, nevertheless are characterized by a great deal of sanctimony as they lecture the rest of us. That is indicative of these men. And so when Jesus appeals to the authority of Scripture here, he is doing them a service. He is teaching the religious leadership in Israel how they're supposed to function in terms of the authoritative Word of God. And he is as well establishing the reality that for all matters of faith and practice, the Word of God is sufficient. So notice this appeal, or rather the authority of Scripture in terms of the appeal. He says in verse 34, "'Is it not written in your law, I said, you are gods?' Now the reference here is to Psalm 82, verse 6. Our brother read this at the outset of worship, and it's on the interpretation of this particular psalm that this particular section is hinged. So notice, in the In the context, is it not written in your law? Now, law there used reference to the Old Testament. The Old Testament is made up of the law proper, the five books of Moses, and then you have the prophets, and then you have the writings. But it's not uncommon to refer to the Old Testament in its entirety as the law. So even though it's a psalm, that is appropriate to refer to it as law. So he appeals to Psalm 82.6. Is it not written in your law? I said, you are gods. Now, before we get to the actual interpretation as Christ leads them, I just want to point out a few things. In this particular psalm, the eye that is speaking is Yahweh. The eye that is speaking is the Most High. It is God Almighty. And the eye that is speaking says what he says here in verse 34. I said, you are gods. Now, I take this as a definition of earthly judges. There are some who suggest that the gods, the Elohim, in Psalm 82, are angelic powers. They suggest that what God is doing, according to Psalm 82, is that He's with this angelic power host, and He's addressing them. But the nature of the psalm indicates that he is dealing with earthly judges. He is dealing with the defense of the fatherless and the widow. He is castigating them for their bad conduct in terms of living as judges in this particular earthly realm. The first two verses indicate this. In fact, you can turn there, to Psalm 86, just to see what the context is in terms of our Lord's appeal to this particular passage. Psalm 82, I'm sorry, Psalm 86, Psalm 82, verse 1. Notice, Psalm of Asaph, God stands in the congregation of the mighty. He judges among the gods, or the Elohim. And then notice what he says. How long will you judge unjustly and show partiality to the wicked? Selah. Defend the poor and fatherless. Do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy. Free them from the hand of the wicked. They do not know, nor do they understand. They walk about in darkness. All the foundations of the earth are unstable. I said, you are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High, but you shall die like men and fall like one of the princes. Arise, O God, judge the earth, for you shall inherit all nations." Now, in terms of the context, God stands in the congregation of the mighty. He judges among the gods. Again, he's not talking about the angelic host. He's talking about earthly judges. He's talking about earthly magistrates. He's talking about the men who have been given the task of carrying out justice for the downtrodden and poor in the civil polity. Notice in verses 6 and 7, I said, you are gods and all of you are children of the Most High, but you shall die like men. The angels don't die like men. And in this instance, they are going to die, but like normal men. They have a prestigious power. They're earthly magistrates. They're earthly judges. They are called Elohim. They are called gods. But because they are deficient in the way that they carry that out, because of the way they sin, because of the way that they jeopardize the defenseless, they're going to die like ordinary men. There's no prestige in their grave. There's no prestige at their funeral. They're going to be cast away just like normal men. You shall die like men and fall like one of the princes. Now go back to the book of Exodus. The book of Exodus, specifically in chapter 22. We've been working our way through. We finished the book of Exodus in our Wednesday night study. And one of the things we saw in the study of the judicial laws of Moses is in Exodus chapter 22, specifically at verse seven. You can turn there. Exodus chapter 22 verse 7. We'll not get into all the particulars in terms of the property damage and what's happening in terms of legislation, but something unique or interesting. If a man delivers to his neighbor money or articles to keep, and it is stolen out of the man's house, if the thief is found, he shall pay double. If the thief is not found, then the master of the house shall be brought to the Elohim, to the gods. to the judges to see whether he has put his hand into his neighbor's goods. So they might say, or some might say, well, it just means that in the presence of Yahweh, they're going to adjudicate this particular case. No, based on scripture, interpreting scripture, we see that God Most High calls earthly judges, civil magistrates, Elohim. He calls them gods. Let every soul be subject to the governing authority, for there is no authority except from whom? Except from God. Jesus speaking his wisdom in Proverbs 8 says, By me kings reign. That doesn't mean that they are autonomous men. They are under his lead. Notice as well, verse 9, for any kind of trespass, whether it concerns an ox, a donkey, a sheep, or clothing, or for any other kind of lost thing, which another claims to be his, the cause of both parties shall come before the Elohim, the gods, and whomever the gods or the Elohim condemn shall pay double to his neighbor. So when we go back to the book of John, specifically in chapter 10, and Jesus appeals to this particular verse, I think he's doing two things. I think in the first place, he is showing how the charge of blasphemy doesn't fit. The charge of blasphemy doesn't fit. The fact that he says that he is the son of God is not enough to wage the war against him in terms of the crime of blasphemy. Now, secondly, I think he is showing that in their particular context, they have fallen prey to the same sorts of sin or the same sorts of crime that the Elohim in Psalm 82 had. Remember, these are men from the Sanhedrin, the highest religious and political court in Israel. Certainly, there's other things they could go after. Certainly, there are defenseless ones like widows and orphans in the first century that they could tend to. Certainly, they could use their time a little bit more profitably in light of God's holy scriptures than to bandy about the charge of blasphemy against the only begotten Son of God. So in many respects, this is not only an interpretation of Psalm 82, but it's also an application of Psalm 82. You're like those Elohim. You're like those earthly judges. You're like those men that have a high place in government in Israel. You've been given great authority from God Most High, and you're squandering it. You're wasting it. You are losing it. You are not engaged in what you ought to be doing. So the Lord Christ is taking them by the hand to a passage that would hopefully convict them and bring them to repentance and faith. Don't miss that in this passage. Christ is still showing that belief in Him means everlasting life. Brethren, I would have been done with these guys a long time ago. I'd have been like, forget it. The first attempt, when they picked up stones to throw at me, would have been enough for me to say, that's it. I'm going to wipe off the dust from my feet, and I'm never coming back to this holy city. I'd have been peaced out. I would have been like, gone. No more. No mas. No mas for Tomas. And yet, the Lord Christ, in the midst of these men, nevertheless says, Believe that I am in my Father, and my Father is in me. Believe. He's showing them the Scripture. He's showing them their sin. He's showing them that they do not have lawful authority to pick up stones and to throw at Him for the crime of blasphemy. Now, notice his particular argument. Well, before that, look at the statement he says concerning the authority of Scripture. Notice in verse 34, I'm sorry, verse 35, "...if he called them gods, to whom the word of God came." And the Scripture cannot be broken, cannot be rendered null and void. It's sufficient and efficient for all matters of faith and practice. It's not something we put on the shelf and forget. It's something that cannot be broken. It is accurate. It is authoritative. It is infallible. It is inerrant. It is all that the Scripture claims to be because it comes from God, the author thereof. So he appeals to the Scripture, he underscores the authority of the Scripture, and then notice that he argues from the Scripture in verse 35. So if He called them gods to whom the Word of God came, and the Scripture cannot be broken, do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, you are blaspheming because I said I am the Son of God? The type of argument that Jesus employs is a lesser to the greater argument. We argue from the lesser to something to the greater in something, and that's precisely what He's doing. The nature of the argument employed by our Lord Jesus Christ is quite simple. If God is all right, and He is, with calling these earthly judges Elohim, and He has, then are you really going to pick up stones to throw at the man that He sanctified and sent? If these earthly Elohim have the title gods, then the Son of God, the only begotten Son, who has come from the bosom of the Father, who, no, rather is in the bosom of the Father, how are you going to pick up stones to throw at Him? And notice how he describes himself here. He's not just the earthly gods, the Elohim. Notice what he says in verse 36. Does that mean sanctified? It means that Jesus was set apart. Some interpret this relative to his humanity, in terms of his human nature. They'd look at chapter 8 and paragraph 3 in our confession. He was sanctified or set apart for the work that God had entrusted to him as the mediator of the new covenant. I take it and I link it with chapter 8 paragraph 1. Chapter 8 paragraph 1 tells us this concerning the son. It pleased God in His eternal purpose to choose and ordain the Lord Jesus, His only begotten Son, according to the covenant made between them both, to be the mediator between God and man, the prophet, priest, and king, head and savior of the church, the heir of all things, and judge of the world, unto whom He did from all eternity give a people to be His seed, and to be by Him in time redeemed, called, justified, sanctified, and glorified. In other words, this is covenant redemption language. So you get the argument from lesser to the greater. If God Most High is okay calling earthly judges Elohim, you're going to take up stones to throw at Jesus because he says, I am the Son of God? Again, brethren, there's a lot more that Jesus could say. There's a lot more that Jesus could argue. There's a lot more that Jesus could bring to bear upon these people. But if the simple allegation is that you are a blasphemer because you being a man make yourself out to be God, then what do you do with those earthly Elohim? And then notice as well, the sending of the Son refers to the Incarnation, the John 1 14 reality. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld His glory. So you see the unique difference between Jesus and those earthly Elohim. You see the unique difference between Jesus and those men who had fallen prey to the judgment and fury of God because they didn't defend the weak. They didn't defend the fatherless and the widow. Cyril says he teaches that there is a great difference between those who are called gods and him who is God by nature. And so if it is appropriate for the Father to refer to earthly judges as God, then it is certainly appropriate for the Father and for everybody else to refer to the Lord Jesus as God. We know that He's God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, one in being with the Father, through whom all things were made. Now, before we proceed, one of the emphases that we have been trying to bring out as we move our way through the Gospel of John is this unique relation between the Father and the Son. Brethren, it is not an exaggeration to say that this unique relation has been called into question over the last several years. There's something called the eternal functional subordination of the Son. Now, we would argue that Christ submits and subordinates to the Father in the work of redemption. The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world always does what is pleasing to His Father. But in terms of theology, the relations between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, there's no gradation. Jesus isn't a little g-god. There is one glorious God, divine and infinite being, and then there are three subsistences, the Father, the Word, or Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Father is unbegotten, the Son is begotten by the Father, and the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. In other words, what we find in John's Gospel is codified at the Council of Nicaea. It's codified later in the Council at Chalcedon. It's codified in the writings of the Church Fathers and through the medieval era and up until the time of the Reformation. But as I said, in the last few years, it has fallen on hard times. In fact, we might step back from the debate concerning the functional subordination of the Son even a bit further, a generation or so. Well, the whole idea of the doctrine of the Trinity has fallen on hard times. We don't think biblically. We don't think properly. We don't think correctly. We don't think God's thoughts after Him in the subject or the topic that is most important. It's interesting, the church wants to have all these principles and helps on how to be a better me. Well, we need to first stop and bask in the glory of God Most High. When Jesus gets to the high priestly prayer in John 17 3, he says, this is eternal life, that they may find realization, that they may find achievement, that they might find a better man. No, this is eternal life, that they may know thee, the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent. If that is descriptive of the age to come, what should we be busy with in this age? It ought to be the study of our God. It ought to be to understand the relation that obtains between the Father and the Son. So that when the Son says, I and my Father are one, instead of picking up stones to throw at Him, or trying to explain that away, because it's just too hard, It's just too difficult. We can't understand that. We stand in awe at the glory of our triune God. We stand in awe, and we worship, and we praise, and we adore, and we understand that to know Him is the very essence of everlasting life. Theology proper, Christology, these ought to be the pursuits of the people of God at every level. I'm not suggesting you go home and read Augustine on the Trinity this afternoon. That's a bit of a tough sled, you know, over the course of an afternoon to be sure, over the course of several afternoons to be sure, but there ought to be this desire on the part of God's people to know God. And in this particular section, He is the Good Shepherd. He is the One that has come to save us from our sins. He has the power to lay down His life and to take it up again. He is the One in whom there is forgiveness. He is the one in whom there is a righteousness by which we may enter into God's presence. He is the one who says to needy sinners, come to me, all you who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest. He is the one that uniquely reveals the Father. John 1.18, no one has seen God at any time, but the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him. And today the church doesn't listen. Today the church would rather have five principles on being a better me, five principles on being a better employer or employee or both. Not that those are wrong, and Paul deals with that. We're going to see it as we move through our exposition of Ephesians in the evening services. But what comes first before being a better you? It's understanding who God is. It's getting a glimpse of the divine being. It's getting a glimpse of the Holy One of Israel, the Most High, the One who is from everlasting to everlasting, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Now notice the application that Jesus brings to bear upon them. Lesser to the greater, if He calls them Elohim, you've got a problem with me? You're gonna throw a stone at me? You're gonna call me a blasphemer? Now notice in verse 37, if I do not do the works of my Father, do not believe me. Good, right? If I don't do the works of my father, then don't believe me. You're off the hook, as it were. He's already pointed to the evidentiary value of his works in verse 25, and again, in this present context. But he says, if I have not done those works, then of course don't believe me. I'm a fake. I'm a sham. I'm a charlatan. I'm just trying to pull one over your eyes. If I haven't done these things, like healing this man that was born blind. If I hadn't done these things, like multiplying the fish and the loaves, if I hadn't done these things, like changing water into wine, if I hadn't done these things that show my lordship and sovereignty over the created order, if I hadn't done these things, then of course don't believe. But if I have in fact done these things, even if you don't believe me for my sake, even if you don't believe me for my word's sake, believe the works themselves. In other words, there's all these signs that are out there that Christ has done, all these signs that affirm who he is, all these signs that confirm that he is, in fact, that one who's come from the Father and bears a unique and special relation to him. Believe. Notice, this is what he says to these wretches. If I do not do the works of my Father, do not believe me. But if I do, though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in me, and I in him. Poole says proper effects give testimony to the proper cause. He who does those things which none but God can do must needs be God or empowered by God to do that. As I said, notice in verse 25, I told you and you do not believe the works that I do in my Father's name. They bear witness of me. several other places in John's gospel, he refers to the evidentiary value of the signs that have been done. And they are there, not so you can say, wow, that was nice. Wow, that was great. That was impressive. Like you went to a magic show at some club and you were dazzled by the way the guy pulled the queen of hearts from behind your ear. That was amazing. That's not how these signs are supposed to function. They have evidentiary value as effect pointing to the cause. If it's something that none but God can do, and Jesus does them, what's the clear implication? That he must be none but God. God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, one in being with the Father, through whom all things were made. That's his point. That's his emphasis. And then notice how he ends this section very similarly as he does in verse 30. He says, but if I do, If I do, though you do not believe me, believe the works that you may know and believe that the Father is in me and I in him. Intriguing. He already knows how they responded to his statement that I and my father are one. They go find stones to throw at him and to bash his skull in. Let's not, you know, sort of dance around here. That's what they wanted to do. That's what they did to Stephen. You know, we see this language in the Bible about stoning this criminal offender to death. And we're so far removed. We are so far removed even from the concept of justice in the civil sphere. I just read that another state in the U.S. outlawed the death penalty. May I just say to you that no civil government has the right to overturn God's law, God's rule, God's will relative to the punishment of criminal offenders? When you don't execute a murderer, you bring blood guiltiness upon your land. It's just that simple. When you don't execute a murderer, you bring blood guiltiness upon your land. Think about those lands that celebrate abortion. Imagine how much blood guiltiness is upon our land, or that celebrate euthanasia for just about any cause. Think how much blood guiltiness is upon our land. When it comes to this reality, the execution of criminal offenders, we ought to be 100% behind it. But when it's done in this manner, when it's done in this kind of a road sense, when it's degenerated to mob mentality, when it's no better than the beasts of the field trying to eat one another because one of them did something wrong. I don't even know if they do that. They don't do that kind of thing, I don't think. They only eat things that they need to eat with or for nutrition. But relative to this. They wanted to take up stones to throw at the Lord of Glory. Think about that, right? And again, going back just a few moments in the sermon, if it were me, I'd probably be like, that's it. You know, I've tried, I've been patient, you know, this overture, this constant emphasis, but you know, you've worn out, you're welcome at this point. Brethren, this is the nature of our God. I'm always surprised and a bit shocked and a little bit concerned when I talk to people, and not anyone here, of course, but, oh, the Old Testament, so full of blood and wrath and fury and guts and devastation. I mean, God commanded the children of Israel to go into the land of Canaan and to dispossess that land of the Canaanites. He didn't command them to do so by, you know, invitations, you know, we want you to go to this other place, it's so much nicer, but by killing them and by breaking things. People have this animus to the Old Testament because they think that Yahweh is this vengeful, vindictive, capricious God that's just out there barking at Israel to go and kill poor innocent Canaanites. Brethren, the poor innocent Canaanites were wretches. They were vile. They were vicious. So God uses none too righteous Israel to deal with the Canaanites. Now when Israel takes the occupation of the land and they live like the Canaanites, God uses the Assyrians and He uses the Babylonians to deal with them in like manner. There's no capriciousness there. There's no arbitrariness there. But behind the scenes is God's patience, God's long-suffering. Do you know how many times He bore with them? Do you know how much he continued with them? There's that bit in 1 Kings 21 when Ahab wants Naboth's vineyard. And he does so. He uses Jezebel, that wretched mother of the year, woman of the year, Jezebel. She goes in and concocts these charges and has Naboth put to death for blasphemy, interestingly enough. So Elijah the Tishbite comes on the scene. He reproves Ahab. And then Ahab, the chronicler makes it sound even more better. But at least in the Kings, we see there's this at least brokenness about what he had done. There's this sort of pang of conscience that Ahab, again, Ahab was not a righteous man by any stretch of the imagination. But he made a movement in the right direction. And it's almost like Yahweh sort of nudges Elijah and says, do you see that? There was something to be encouraged about there. There was something there that was a movement in the right direction. I mentioned last time in the book of Exodus, the man Moses, that man of God says, show me your glory. And God says, I'll put you in the cleft of the rock and I'll cause all my goodness to pass by you. What's the goodness that is revealed? The goodness that is revealed is His grace. It is His mercy. It is His long-loving, long-suffering. And then it is His forgiveness of sin, transgression, and iniquity. So when we consider these things, we ought to appreciate the patience of our God. And if you are not a believer here this morning, you need to appreciate the patience of our God. Because you have done enough, along with the rest of us, to merit God's wrath and curse, both in this life and that which is to come. And yet, because of God's goodness and His patience, His long-suffering and His kindness, we're not in hell. And by God's grace, He opens the eyes of some that they may behold their own sin, their own wickedness, their own transgression, and that they might behold the Son of God who takes away the sin of the world. So do not test or try the patience of God. It's long-suffering to be sure, but it's not never-ending. There is a day coming, the day of judgment, wherein Christ will judge the living and the dead, the righteous will go into eternal bliss, and the wicked will be cast off into eternal punishment, eternal woe. So don't test or try the patience of the long-suffering of God. If you're a young person or a child, you'll say, well, you know, when I'm 25, I'll make my peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Don't do that. There is no better time than right now to look on to the Lord Jesus Christ. Behold, now is the acceptable time. Today is the day of salvation. Don't tarry. Don't resist. Don't reject. Don't say, well, you know, there's just not enough there. What more could you possibly want? The word became flesh and dwelt among us. And he did this so that we could behold his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of what? Full of grace and truth. This whole emphasis on not coming to Jesus, vis-a-vis hyper-Calvinism, it makes no sense of the Bible. It makes no sense whatsoever. It makes no sense of Luke 15 when that prodigal is seen by the father, and the father runs to him, and the father falls on him. Not to throw blows at him, not to rebuff him, not to rebuke him, but to receive him. Don't tarry, don't wait, don't resist, but rather look on to this one. If he is saying these words to a mob of men that are ready to kill him for no reason, then listen. Listen to what he has to say here. But if I do, though you do not believe me, and I would just suggest there's every reason why you should believe him, believe the works that you may know and believe that the Father is in me and I in him. So he doubles down on that reality that I and my Father are one. So what do they do? Finally see it the light bulb goes off over their head off. Yeah, he is all together lovely He is chief among 10,000. No, remember these are thieves. These are robbers These are the kind of men that like to kill and destroy These are the kind of men that are supposed to be defending the the the downtrodden and poor They're supposed to be helping those who are widows and orphans in Israel, but they're badgering this man who is wholly harmless and undefiled They don't see it They continue to resist it, they continue to reject it, and they live in light of that reality. Notice, the attempt to arrest Jesus. Therefore, they sought again to seize Him. I think the language here, some translations actually have it to arrest Him. I think that's probably the way to go with the interpretation here. They're not conquered. They're not concerned. They don't care. The signs don't do anything for them. The words don't do anything for them. The appeal to Psalm 82, the argument from lesser to the greater, doesn't do anything for them. These men are not His sheep. These men are resistant. These men are rejecters. These men are despisers. So they want to arrest Him, and they want to formalize this process. And then when it says, but he escaped out of their hand, I don't know what all that means, but he was able to evade that. Some of the commentators get a little bit wild at things like this, so I don't want to get wild at interpretation. Whatever we can say, we can say this. He escaped out of their hand. They were not able to arrest him. They were not able to seize him. And the reason why he escaped from them is because it was not yet his time to die. He knew that he was going to die. He knew the plan and purpose of God the Father. He knew the obligations of the covenant placed upon him. He was most happy to carry these things out. I always do that, which is pleasing to my Father, but this was not yet his time. So he evades them, and then that brings us to the Transjordan. Notice, the ministry in the Transjordan, that simply means on the other side of the River Jordan. on the other side, sort of the eastern side of Jordan, you've got Jerusalem, you've got the bulk of Israel on the western side of Jordan, but you've got now Jesus go away to this place, notice in verse 40, and he went away again beyond the Jordan to the place where John was baptizing at first, and there he stayed. This is where the public ministry according to John's gospel begins. 1.28. In fact, you can turn there, because I think this is important. Chapter 1, verse 28. After the prologue, verses 1 to 18, we see the economy. We see the work of redemption. We see the Son, who is God, one with God, and yet distinct from the Father, come into this world sinners to save. And notice in verse 28, these things were done in Bethabara, beyond the Jordan. That means Transjordan, eastern side, where John was baptizing. The next day, John saw Jesus coming toward him. What's the obvious implication? Jesus is in the Transjordan. Jesus is there where John is. So he saw Jesus coming toward him and said, Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Going back to chapter 10, I think we have the end, the formal end of his public ministry. Not that the events that occur in chapters 11 and 12 are private, but in terms of his public ministry, His interaction with the various sorts of foes that he faces there in Israel in this first century context, he's come full circle. He started in the Transjordan, he now ends back in the Transjordan. And then notice what we see in verse 41. Then many came to him. See, here's what John, I think, wants you to get. If you followed the story up until this part, you might be tempted to say, what a miserable failure. Not Jesus, but this ministry. I mean, everywhere he goes, he makes enemies. Everywhere he goes, they want to kill him. Everywhere he goes, they want to destroy him. That just doesn't seem like what we'd expect in terms of God's glory manifested in the world. Notice the many, the hoi polloi. I think John is doing some theology here for us. The once holy city is now devoid of any true religion. The once holy city is only worthy for judgment. The once holy city is basically being cast off. I mentioned to the brethren yesterday, if you look back in the book of Ezekiel, around chapters 8 to 11, you see the departure of the glory of God from the temple. You see the departure of the glory of God from the temple. I'm not saying that Jesus doesn't come back to Jerusalem. I'm not saying that Jesus doesn't come again into that holy city. He must come back. He must be tried. He must be executed. And he must be raised again from the dead. But I think John is taking us by the hand and showing us something. That while the many in Jerusalem despise him and reject him and resist him and forsake him and want to kill him, that doesn't mean that many elsewhere are going to receive him the same way. The many elsewhere see him as altogether lovely and chief among 10,000. Remember, he's made the delineation between my sheep and you guys. You're not my sheep. See, we can get very discouraged as the people of God, thinking, you know, this is it. This is it. I hope we don't do that with our small group here. But, you know, we see the people of God as a whole, and we see the wretched, you know, godless. They seem to be winning at times, don't they? I mean, let's be honest, at times it seems that they're winning. I mean, we have to change our language, we have to change the way that we think, we have to change the way that we do, we have to move in their particular directions, and we might throw up our hands at times, well, wait a minute, God's on high. Christ is enthroned at the right hand. You see, God does not work in a manner to satisfy what we think ought to be. In other words, Jesus says, I will build my church and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. We focus on the build my church, and well, we should, but we need to remember the gates of Hades certainly tries to stop that. The gates of Hades certainly tries to resist that. The gates of Hades tries to stop up the progress of the kingdom of Jesus. See, brethren, there's going to be difficulties. There's going to be hardships. The Savior set forth the example. Hebrews 5.8 tells us that the Son of God learned obedience through what? Through suffering. This triumphalistic spirit, this mindset that, you know what? We're children of the King, and therefore, everybody better just knuckle under. That's simply not what you should expect in terms of God's holy word. Now, I believe the gospel is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in that gospel, the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith, that as it is written, the just shall live by faith. I believe, according to the book of Revelation, there'll be a great multitude that no man can number, from every tribe, every tongue, every people, and every nation. But I also believe that between A and Z, there's going to be a lot of heartache, and a lot of hardship, and a lot of trial, and a lot of affliction for the people of God. When you look at the history of the church, that's what the experience was. When you look at the pages of the New Testament, that's what we're taught to expect. Jesus says in the upper room in this world you will have tribulation, doesn't he? He does say that, brethren. So when we have tribulation now, when we have trial or affliction now, instead of saying, God, where are you? We ought to say, all the promises of God are yea and amen in our Lord Jesus Christ. He promised this. I'm not saying we abdicate. I'm not saying we retreat. I'm not saying we go live out, you know, on the top of Mount Shem. Let's all go, you know, pitch our tents up there and just wait for Jesus to come. There's got to be a way that the people of God can still be lights shining in the midst of darkness, can still be lights in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, and still hold forth that word of truth even when it is bleak, even when it is difficult, even when it is a trial. And with reference to our blessed Savior, He moves from the holy city of Jerusalem where He's rejected and resisted. He goes transjordan, and what happens? Many come to Him. And what do the many say? They acknowledge John the Baptist didn't do any works. John the Baptist wasn't out there transjordan doing, you know, wondrous things. He wasn't healing people. He wasn't raising the dead. He wasn't multiplying the loaves and the fish. He wasn't doing that. But what did they conclude or what did they come to understand according to the Baptist testimony? Notice in verse 41, then many came to him and said, John performed no sign, but all the things that John spoke about this man were true. All the things that John spoke about this man were true. Listen to the commentator, Edward Klink. He says, by returning to the Baptist, the reader is reminded of the message of the Baptist to hear afresh his witness and titles for Jesus that emerged at the gospel start from the Baptist ministry. Let me just repeat that. Listen to what he says. This is important. By returning to the Baptist, John 1.28, Jesus goes, 1.29, to John, transjordan, Bethabara. Now we have him here, and many are coming, and many are saying, John didn't do anything, signs, wonders, miracles, he didn't have that, wasn't an Elijah in that regard, wasn't an Elisha in that regard, didn't have that power that God gave to Moses, he didn't have that. But everything that he spoke about this man were true. And now notice, he says, by returning to the Baptist, the reader is reminded of the message of the Baptist to hear afresh his witness and the titles for Jesus that emerged at the gospel start from the Baptist ministry. Lamb of God, John 129. Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. I think Klink is right. It's kind of bringing us full swing here. Whatever discouragement we may have seen along the way in the temple, whatever discouragement you may have seen along the way with the religious leadership, whatever discouragement you may have borne along the way, be encouraged, be refreshed, be helped. So he says, Lamb of God, 129. Messiah, 141. Son of God and King of Israel, 148. It is not what the Baptist did, no sign, but what he said that was important. Jesus would do the signs. The Baptist merely pointed to Jesus. In many ways, the gospel itself, like the Baptist, is to be remembered by the reader as simply pointing to Jesus and his signs. What do we do if we're going to follow the Savior? I don't want to moralize, I don't want to get all therapeutic here, but I think there is a paradigm for us. We live in a day and age where the religious leadership, and even within the professing walls of Christianity, the civil state, to be sure, there's lots of opposition against us. It's very easy to get discouraged. It's very easy to get downcast. But who's Jesus? He's the Lamb of God. Jesus is the Messiah. Jesus is the Son of God. Jesus is the one in whom there is forgiveness. We don't get beaten down. We don't get battered. We don't get to the point where we're rendered ineffective or where we retreat. We do what Paul says in Philippians 2, and we shine as lights in a crooked and perverse generation, and we point to Jesus and his signs. That, in the final analysis, is what you and I do in the midst of a day and age that looks more like the so-called Holy City than the Transjordan. Are there times of revival in the history of the Church? Absolutely. Should we pray for times of revival in the history of the Church? Absolutely. Should we always expect it? Not necessarily. I mean, Kerry was right, you know, ask great things and expect great things of God. But expectation, brethren, if it's going to bring you to the point of despair, well, you know, I've prayed this five times and God hasn't answered. That's not the way you're supposed to act or think. God's not Baal. There's no formulaic response or approach to God. We just put in a few units of prayer and out we get the blessings. He's not a vending machine. He's not, you know, number A2 and you get your chips because you put in your dollar. No, you've got to be patient and persevering and understand that while the so-called Holy City wants to kill him, there's people out in the Transjordan that are coming to him. I was quite encouraged last night at that concert to hear that Kenya, 82% of people in Kenya profess to be believers in Jesus. I didn't know that number was that high. That made me happy. Now, I'm not suggesting that every single one of those 82% are all necessarily saved. But man, do you think there's 82% of the 36 million in Canada that would profess to be believers in Jesus Christ? I doubt it. I doubt the numbers would be anywhere near there. So while we see what we see in terms of a rejection approach, there's great things going on elsewhere. There's great things that God is doing. He will not be frustrated. He will not be thwarted. He will not be stopped. The gates of hell may pose their defense, but that kingdom of Jesus Christ will plunder it, just like the strongman plunders that invader. And notice how the passage ends, and many believed in him there. John performed no sign, but all the things that John spoke about this man were true, and many believed in him there. The cursory reader may suspect along the way that Jesus is met with futility and rejection and only heartache. No, Jesus is in control. Jesus knows what's happening. Jesus is fully conscious, fully submissive to His Father according to His humanity, doing the will of the Father so that He can save His people from their sin, so that He can fetch the sheep. And I think probably there's a bit of an emblem here. in terms of Gentile inclusion in the covenant promises of God. He's already hinted at that. Well, not hinted, look at 1016. 1016, and other sheep I have which are not of this fold, them also I must bring, and they will hear my voice, and there will be one flock and one shepherd. So where does he go? He goes to Transjordan. What does he do there? He preaches, and he teaches, and many believe in him there. What's that symptomatic of? From every tribe, every tongue, every people, and every nation. Well, in conclusion, we should appreciate in the first place the wretchedness of these leaders. Brethren, when the religious leadership in any given institution devolves like these did, that's when you blow up the institution. I'm speaking metaphorically. C4, you know, C on the other side. I'm not saying that, especially if it happens here, don't blow me up. I mean, you can just ask me to leave or throw me out. Prefer that than blowing me up. Actually, I don't know. Jesus, even so, come Lord Jesus. Send us all to the other side. But this is a bad, bad thing. Jesus indicts them in chapter 10, verse 10. The thief does not come except to steal and to kill and to destroy. And they demonstrate that very activity by the way that they treat the Son of God, by the way that they treat the One who has come in fulfillment of the prophetic word, that One who is altogether lovely and chief among ten thousand. They, of course, have the appearance of functioning according to the law. You can't blaspheme Leviticus 24. But they're sanctimonious, they're false, they're irreligious, they're godless men. The reality of rejecting the law, they don't even pretend to engage in due process. See, I'm convinced that's another thing we're losing today. Slowly but surely, we've lost the whole idea of justice. And when you lose justice, that breaks the back of the people. That breaks the back of the body politic. When there's two tiers of justice, when one group can get away with murder and the others can't get away with anything, not that I'm suggesting we should be able to get away with anything, but there is a problem when justice is gone. There is a problem when justice has been adulterated. There is a problem when justice has been thrown aside. This is a discouraging thing, but it's not something unique to us. We see it right here in the first century. As well, their ignorance concerning the Old Testament. The Messiah prophesied a divine Messiah. And the rejection of the Son of God who clearly set forth his identity. Verses 30 and again in verse 39, that the Father is in me and I in him. Gill explains this this way, that they are one in nature, distinct in person, equal in power, and have a mutual inhabitation and communion in the divine essence, all which is manifest by doing the same works and which are out of the reach and power of any mere creature. No creature can say what Jesus says, that the Father is in me and I in him. In this divine and infinite being, there are three subsistences. We're not one of them. That's just not going to happen. We're creature. He's creator. We're finite. He's infinite. The claims that Jesus makes here is a claim or claim that only the Son of God by nature could make. As well, the authority of Scripture. The Lord Jesus appeals in this context with religious leaders to the Scripture. Oh, you want to execute me for blasphemy? Let's just vet this. Let's just investigate this. Let's just see if what you're saying is right. I've claimed to be the Son of God. Okay, what about the gods, the Elohim, in Psalm 82? Would you have stood there? Would you have picked up stones there? Would you have cast them into that congregation of men? How about the Elohim in Exodus 22? How about the Elohim in Exodus 21? How about the reality that God calls these men Elohim, and there's no violation, there's no blasphemy, there's no cause for stoning? They don't understand their own scripture. They don't understand theology. He argues from the lesser to the greater. The implication is that their judgeship ultimately mirrors the guilty ones in Psalm 82. And I think as well, I want to extend it one bit, one jot and tittle further, that the implication is that what Psalm 82.8 tells us is going to happen. It's going to happen. Psalm 82, 8, I'm sorry, "'Arise, O God, judge the earth, for you shall inherit all nations.'" Whatever's going to happen in Jerusalem, whatever's going to happen in the so-called Holy City, they're going to be cut off, but God Most High is going to send forth His gospel, conquering and to conquer, all throughout the earth. And then the final observation is the typology in the passage. Think way back to last Sunday. Way back. This is Hanukkah. It's the Feast of Lights, the Feast of Dedication. What's it a commemoration of? Judas Maccabeus, the defender of the temple. The anti-type is here. The reason for the temple is here. What was prophesied concerning temple, tabernacle, as dwelling place of God with men is realized in our blessed Savior. He became flesh and dwelt among us. We, the sheep, beheld His glory. The goats didn't, so they picked up stones to throw at Him. But Judas Maccabeus was the hero at that time in redemptive history. The hero is now standing in their midst, and they want to kill him. Jesus Christ is that one that the Bible prophesies is the hero for needy sinners. If you haven't seen him as your hero by grace, look to him in faith. Why do we as God's people see him as a hero? Because we believe in him. It's not because we're better. It's not because we're holier. It's not because we're more sanctified or we just live the pure life. Our parents were great. Some of us had miserable parents. Some of us had miserable upbringing. Some of us had no religion. Some of us had no guidance. Some of us had no direction. But God in His grace revealed Himself to us. God in His grace rose us from the dead, spiritually speaking. God in His grace gave us the gifts of faith and repentance so that we may look upon Jesus Christ as the one in whom There is salvation, and that Christ is still there. That Christ is still present, and that Christ is still saving all, all who come to Him in faith. Well, let us pray. Our Father in heaven, we thank You for Your Word. We thank You that Jesus Christ throughout the Bible, Old to New Testament, is the hero of Scripture. We see good and godly men in Moses and in David. We see good and godly men in the prophets and in the apostles. But all those men had sin. All those men had their defilement. but our Lord Jesus is holy, harmless, and undefiled, that one who is separate from sinners, and that one who, by grace, receives them unto himself. Bless the gospel today, Lord God, as it goes forth, and may many come to a saving knowledge of our blessed Savior. And we pray in Jesus' name, amen. We'll close with a brief, actually singing 568 in our hymnals, 568, the doxology of praise to our triune God. You can stand with me and we'll sing. ♪ Praise God on whom all blessings flow ♪ Raise him above ye heavenly host. Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Amen. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all. Amen. Father, go with us now. May your face shine upon us. May you keep us by your strength and power. And may you be glorified today as we call the Sabbath of delight. And we pray through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen. Well, please be seated for a brief time of meditation.
