← Back to sermon library
Taking a bit of an excursus from
our studies in the book of Acts, in Acts 14.23, at the end of
the first missionary journey, Paul and Barnabas go back through
the cities, they strengthen the people, they exhort the people,
and as well they appoint elders in each of the churches in those
cities. So I thought it would be good
for us to take this time and look at the appointment of elders. So in 1 Timothy chapter 3, verses
1 to 7, we have a list of the qualifications for elders. So
I'll begin reading in verse 1. This is a faithful saying. If
a man desires the position of a bishop, he desires a good work. A bishop then must be blameless,
the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior,
hospitable, able to teach, not given to wine, not violent, not
greedy for money, but gentle, not quarrelsome, not covetous,
one who rules his own house well, having his children in submission
with all reverence. For if a man does not know how
to rule his own house, how will he take care of the church of
God? Not a novice, lest being puffed up with pride, he fall
into the same condemnation as the devil. Moreover, he must
have a good testimony among those who are outside, lest he fall
into reproach and the snare of the devil. Amen. Well, let us
pray. Our Father, we thank You for
Your Word. We thank You for this opportunity to gather together.
We thank You for Your grace and Your mercy and for the presence
and the power of Your Holy Spirit. And we pray He'd be active now
in our hearts and minds, that You would instruct us as a church
concerning this matter. We pray that You would provide
in Your kindness elders in this local church. We pray not only
for our church, we pray for the work in Vernon, we pray for Surrey,
We pray for all of your churches that need more men, because certainly
the harvest is plentiful, but laborers are few. So we pray
to you, the Lord of the harvest, to raise men up. We ask that
you would forgive us now for all of our sin and transgression.
We pray that you would help us to understand your written word. and may it be an encouragement
to our hearts, and may you strengthen us with might in the inner man,
so that Christ may dwell richly in our hearts through faith.
And we ask this in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, amen. Well, just by way of review,
remember that the Bible uses the terms elder, bishop, that's
the word overseer, and pastor synonymously. When we look at
the various places where this office is referred to, we see
each of those terms applied to the one office. There are two
abiding offices in the church, verses 1 to 7 deal with the elder,
verses 8 and following deal with the deacon. So those are the
two offices that remain in Christ's church. There's no longer apostles,
there's no longer prophets, there's no longer those sorts of gifts
or gifted men that the early church had, but now we simply
have elders and deacons. Elders are tasked primarily with
governing or leading in the context of the local church and being
able to teach. And as we consider this list
of qualifications, last week we looked first at the man's
desire for eldership, that's in verse 1. Secondly, we looked
at the man's personal holiness, that's in verses 2 to 3. Thirdly,
we looked at the man's domestic faithfulness, verses 4 and 5.
And this morning we'll take up the man's experience in the faith,
verse 6. Next, the man's testimony toward
outsiders, in verse 7. And then finally, the man's ability
to teach, in verse 2. Now, I went a little bit different
in terms of the structure or order, because I wanted to end
on teaching. All the other gifts describe
a man's character. what he must be in terms of Christian
virtue, it is the gift that distinguishes him from the deacon. Deacons
must hold the truth in a consistent manner as well, but they're not
required by way of office to preach or teach the word of God.
That is something distinctive for elders in the context of
Christ's church. But just by way of reminder,
in terms of a desire for eldership, there must be a desire born of
right motives. In other words, there must be
this impetus in a man to preach and teach and shepherd the people
of God for good motives. Secondly, there must be graces
indicating genuine Christian experience. He must be born again. Thirdly, there must be gifts
indicating divine provision. If a man is called to preach,
God is going to equip him to preach. And then fourthly, an
opportunity indicating providential opening. So a man's gift makes
room for him. He does not make room for his
gift. And then in terms of the personal
holiness, we see that that is consistent with reference to
all believers. I ended last week by exhorting
each and every one of us to strive after these characteristics or
after these virtues. This is what Christianity looks
like. Those blood-bought children of
God who have the Holy Spirit, who are justified freely by God's
grace, enter into the life of sanctification, and this ought
to be the pursuit. Will we do it perfectly? No.
Will we do it consistently? No. Where do we go when we fail? We go to God through Christ seeking
forgiveness, but this is the standard by which we are to proceed. As well, domestic faithfulness,
the language of verses 4 and 5, is an argument from the lesser
to the greater. If you look at verse 4, he must
rule his own house well. Not just rule, but rule his own
house well, having his children in submission with all reverence,
And then parenthetically, for if a man does not know how to
rule his own house, how will he take care of the church of
God? Again, if he can't function in the context of his own four
walls, then he shouldn't serve as an elder in the context of
the church's walls. It is an argument from the lesser
to the greater. Now let's look fourthly, in terms
of the broader categories, at the man's experience in the faith.
Verse 6 tells us, not a novice, literally it's not a neophyte,
one that is not newly planted, not a new convert. We've all
heard that terminology before. And so Paul says, not a novice,
lest being puffed up with pride, he fall into the same condemnation
as the devil. Now, in terms of this particular
qualification, remember the first missionary journey. Remember
that they took probably about a year and a half to two years
to engage in this. They went from city to city.
In AD 47 to 48, they preach from place to place. They make disciples. They plant churches. On their
return to Antioch in Syria, they appoint elders. Now those elders
that they had appointed hadn't been men in the faith for 10
or 15 or 20 years. They were chronologically new
converts. They were chronologically new
neophytes. They were chronologically men
that were newly planted. If you turn for just a moment
over to the book of Titus, you see sort of the same thing. Titus
chapter one, verse five. For this reason, I left you in
Crete that you should set in order the things that are lacking
and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you. And then
he gives a list similar to what he gives in 1 Timothy 3. Well, the great reality is, is
that in Crete, it wasn't the case that the church had been
well-established for a long time. They would have, again, been
chronologically relatively new converts to the Christian faith. In fact, some have made the observation. When you look at 1 Timothy 3,
you have the qualifications for both elders and then deacons.
When you turn to Titus, there's no qualifications given for deacons. I don't think that means that
Paul doesn't want deacons in the churches in Crete, but rather
it means that the first order of business is to establish elders. The first order of business is
to institute that office in the churches that obtained there
in Crete. Not that deacons are unimportant,
but the church in Ephesus was more established. It had been
around longer, and therefore Paul speaks not only concerning
elders, but deacons with reference to gospel ministry. But in terms
of this particular qualification, it's not calling necessarily
for age setting. In other words, it doesn't mean
that an elder must be 25, he must be 30, he must have had
this many years in service as a Christian before he's promoted
to the rank of elder. Rather, the text is specifically
calling on the Church to reflect soberly, to reflect most carefully
on the men she selects in terms of elders in the context of the
Church. William D. Mount says, the application
of this rule would depend upon the relative age of the local
church, its speed of growth, and many other factors that would
vary from place to place and from time to time. A similar
injunction does not occur in Titus 1. Again, it's a different
scenario and a different context. And so Paul says, with reference
to this overarching principle, they must be mature. That's the
primary emphasis. If he is a relatively new convert
in times of chronology, he's only been a believer for a year
or two years or five years, nevertheless he is to be a mature man. He
is to demonstrate capability and competence with reference
to the aptness to teach and with reference to the characteristics
that are necessary for the Christian faith. I think that later on,
Paul is highlighting a problem that is open to churches that
we need to be aware of. Look at 1 Timothy chapter 5,
specifically at verse 22. Well, we'll pick up in verse
21. So this is the problem involved. If we rush ahead, if we don't
give any consideration to the maturity level of the particular
individual, and we lay hands on someone hastily, just because
we got to fill a position, just because we have to have a breathing
person functioning as an elder, that will typically not end well.
We need to be careful when it comes to the installation of
elders in the local church that they be mature men in terms of
their ability to think, their ability to preach and teach,
and their ability to exhibit the sorts of graces and the characteristics
that are displayed or are required by the apostle in terms of eldership. And if you look at verse 6, Paul
highlights or gives the caution as to why it ought not to be
a novice. lest, being puffed up with pride,
he fall into the same condemnation as the devil." Brethren, pride
is always an issue for every single one of us, isn't it? Now, if you say, well, not me,
brother. Okay, you've just exhibited pride. That's always a concern
for every one of the people of God. In fact, look at 1 Peter
5 for just a moment. 1 Peter 5 and his teaching. Verse five, he says, likewise,
you younger people submit yourselves to your elders. Yes, all of you
be submissive to one another and be clothed with humility
for God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble. So
if pride is a perennial problem for every one of God's people,
throw a new convert into leadership in the church of the Lord Jesus
Christ and see what happens. This is tantamount to failure. If we rush this process, if we
put somebody that is a neophyte, somebody that is newly planted,
somebody that is a new convert into the role of eldership, and
he is not ready to embrace that particular role, Very often,
pride is one of the corollaries that comes along with it. In
fact, Jonathan Edwards wrote a whole treatise on a caution
against spiritual pride during the time of revival that he witnessed
in his ministry. There is that reality, and we
don't wanna, A, hurt the church of Jesus Christ by rushing a
neophyte into the eldership so he can pour his pride all over
us, but secondly, we wanna protect him. He needs to be stable. He needs to be girded. He needs
to have that sort of security in himself before we place him
in a teaching role in the church. James 3 is a reality and we mustn't
ever forget it. Let not many of you become teachers.
Why? For we shall receive a stricter
judgment. Again, we don't want to not only
protect the church, we want to protect men. We don't want to
put them in a compromise situation. We don't want to put them in
a place where there's going to be various temptations that they're
not fit and ready to deal with. And not to say that old converts
are necessary immune from pride either. You perhaps heard the
old adage that was one of the famous preachers. Some old woman
came up to him after the service and said, that was a great sermon.
Thank you for preaching it. And he said, madam, the devil
already told me that. Now, I don't think that was to
rain on her parade from ever encouraging people. I've noticed
whenever I use that illustration, people treat me like a pariah
because they don't want to make me proud. Well, thank you for
wanting to spare my propensity to pride, but I don't think that's
the point. The point is that pride is in the hearts of all
of God's people. And if we put a young man that
is young in the faith and not stable, not secure, not able
to deal with that sort of thing, then it's not only a problem
for the church, but it's a problem for him. I think we have a responsibility
not only to protect the church, but we have a responsibility
to protect her members and not put them in a position where
they're compromised. Now notice fifthly, the man's
testimony toward outsiders. Verse seven says, moreover, he
must have a good testimony among those who are outside, lest he
fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. Now, notice what
the text says. He must have a good testimony. Not just a testimony, but it
must be a good testimony. He not only needs to rule his
house, but he must rule his house well. Again, these are things
that all of us should be pursuing, all of us should be seeking after,
but they are things that should be demonstrable in the lives
of those who we select for eldership in the Christian church. Well,
this is not confined to eldership. This is upon all God's people
as well. Turn to Colossians 4 for just
a moment. The mindset ought not to be,
we shouldn't care about the pagans or we shouldn't care about what
the world says. Well, we're not supposed to care about the pagans
and what the world says when it contradicts Bible. But with
reference to our own testimony, our own conversation before men,
we must maintain a good testimony. Another necessary qualification
is beware when all men speak beautifully about gospel ministers. If that were the case, I would
be curious as to what that minister is actually preaching. But in
terms of his testimony, his Christian testimony, he should be a faithful
man. He shouldn't have the house that
looks like it should be condemned in his neighborhood. He shouldn't
be the guy that doesn't pay his taxes. He shouldn't be the guy
that's always late for work. He shouldn't be the murmurer.
He shouldn't be the whiner. He shouldn't be the complainer.
He should rather have a good testimony with those outside
the church. That is absolutely required by
the apostle Paul. And notice in Colossians chapter
4, verse 5, walk in wisdom toward those who are outside redeeming
the time. Again, the mindset that we don't
care about anybody outside the church is absolutely unbiblical. We're not supposed to kowtow
to those outside the church, deny Jesus to those outside the
church, but in terms of our Christianity, it ought not to be a blot on
the name of Christ because people know that we're believers. We
ought to bring glory to our Lord in the conduct that we have with
others. 1 Thessalonians 4. 1 Thessalonians
4. Well, verse 11, that you also
aspire to lead a... Boy, this text needs to be preached.
Look at verse nine. But concerning brotherly love,
you have no need that I should write to you. For you yourselves
are taught by God to love one another. And indeed you do so
toward all the brethren who are in all Macedonia. But we urge
you, brethren, that you increase more and more, that you also
aspire to lead a quiet life, to mind your own business and
to work with your own hands as we commanded you. Isn't that
a great passage? We all want something that God
says isn't for us necessarily. Pastors want celebrity. Persons want notoriety. People
want prestige. Paul says, do what you're supposed
to do and mind your own business. Boy, that is a very good emphasis
that needs to be thundered from every Christian pulpit in the
world. But notice in verse 12, that
you may walk properly toward those who are outside and that
you may lack nothing. Peter emphasizes this as well.
1 Peter 2. 1 Peter 2 at verse 12. Verse 11, beloved, I beg you
as sojourners and pilgrims abstain from fleshly lusts, which war
against the soul, having your conduct honorable among the Gentiles,
that when they speak against you as evildoers, they may by
your good works, which they observe, glorify God in the day of visitation. Verse 15, for this is the will
of God, that by doing good, you may put to silence the ignorance
of foolish men. In other words, that testimony
that our elders ought to have should be a good one with those
who are outside the church. Now, I'm going to read a bit
of an extended quotation from Charles Spurgeon. It's from the
lecture in his lectures to my students called The Minister's
Ordinary Conversation. In other words, what characterizes
a minister in his normal day-to-day affairs? And I'm going to just
capitalize on one instance, not only because it's very funny,
but also because it's very instructive. This is his point. The Christian
minister should also be very cheerful. Now, obviously, I need
to take heed to that. My disposition isn't always to
walk around with a big smile on my face, but I'm, for the
most part, trying to be a cheerful guy. But listen to what he says
in terms of this point relative to ministers. He says, I don't
believe in going about like certain monks whom I saw in Rome who
salute each other in sepulchral tones, that means the language
of a grave, and convey the pleasant information, brother, we must
die, to which lively salutation each lively brother of the order
replies, yes, brother, we must die. I was glad to be assured
upon such good authority that all these lazy fellows are about
to die. Upon the whole, it is about the
best thing they can do. But till that event occurs, they
might use some more comfortable form of salutation. No doubt,
there are some people who will be impressed by the very solemn
appearance of ministers. Is that necessary? Everybody
goes on to say, I have heard of one who felt convinced that
there must be something in the Roman Catholic religion from
the extremely starved and pinched appearance of a certain ecclesiastic. Look, said he, how the man is
worn to a skeleton by his daily fastings and nightly vigils,
how he must mortify his flesh. Spurgeon says, now, the probabilities
are that the emaciated priest was laboring under some internal
disease, which he would have been heartily glad to be rid
of, and it was not conquest of appetite, but failure in digestion
which had so reduced him, or possibly a troubled conscience
which made him fret himself down to the light weights. Certainly,
I have never met with a text which mentions prominence of
bone as an evidence of grace. If so, the living skeleton should
have been exhibited, not merely as a natural curiosity, but as
the standard of virtue. Some of the biggest rogues in
the world have been as mortified in appearance as if they had
lived on locusts and wild honey. It is a very vulgar error to
suppose that a melancholy countenance is the index of a gracious heart.
I commend cheerfulness to all who would win souls, not levity
and frothiness, but a genial, happy spirit. There are more
flies caught with honey than with vinegar, and there will
be more souls led to heaven by a man who wears heaven in his
face than by one who bears Tartarus in his looks." So the point is,
this idea that religion produces that is not biblical. a cheerful spirit, a good testimony
with those outside. He's not the guy that everybody
in the neighborhood looks at because he won't cut his grass,
because he won't pay his bills, because he won't function as
a normal, ordinary, contributing member of society. Again, there's
no bonus or brownie points for this. This is what every believer
ought to be. This is how we ought to conduct
ourselves. Again, beware if all men everywhere
speak only good of you, because you're probably not ever offending
them with the cross. But if they have cause to complain
about your offense of the cross, may it never be a cause to complain
because you are a busybody, because you are an irritant, because
you are a pest. In fact, look at 1 Peter chapter
4, again, where we see some of this displayed. In a different
context, I'll grant, but the take-home message is the same.
1 Peter chapter 4, the apostle
deals with trials, with tribulations, with persecution, and with hardship
that come upon the people of God. He gives four responses
to it. He says in verse 12, we're to
expect it. He says in verses 13 and 14,
we're to exult in it, that means rejoice. Thirdly, he says to
evaluate its cause, verses 15 to 18. And then finally he says,
entrust yourself to God, verse 19. What is instructive for us
is verses 15 to 18. Evaluate its cause. Why are you suffering persecution? Why is it at work nobody likes
you? Is it because you're always preaching
the gospel, or is it because you're a lousy worker? If it's
because you're a lousy worker, don't try to wear the martyr's
badge, but rather repent and be a good worker. That's the
emphasis of Peter. Notice what he says, verse 12,
"'Beloved, do not think it strange concerning the fiery trial, which
is to try you, as though some strange thing happened to you.'"
There's the expected. Verse 13, "'Rejoice to the extent
that you partake of Christ's sufferings, that when His glory
is revealed, you may also be glad with exceeding joy. If you
are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for
the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their party
is blaspheme, but on your party is glorified. Now notice what
he says, verse 15, but let none of you suffer as a murderer,
a thief, an evildoer, or as a busybody in other people's matters. Yet
if anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let
him glorify God in this matter. You see the distinction that
Peter draws. There is suffering because we're
Christians. There is suffering because we own Jesus Christ and
He owns us. But there's also suffering because
we're busybodies. There's also suffering because
we're thieves. There's also suffering because
we are meddlesome people. If that is the reason why we
are undergoing persecution, again, it's not, oh, woe is me, I'm
trying to be godly in a godless age and they're all persecuting
me. No, it may just be you need to work harder. You need to show
up on time. You need to cut your grass. You
need to put your trash cans away. You need to function in a manner
that is consistent with the second great commandment. Love the Lord
your God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength. Love
your neighbor as yourself. Last time I checked, even those
outside the church are our neighbor, and if we do not love them, we
are not fit for gospel ministry. And again, Paul in 1 Timothy
3, at verse 7, gives the caution. Moreover, he must have a good
testimony among those who are outside, lest he fall into reproach
and the snare of the devil. George Knight says verses 6 and
7 seek to protect both the man and the church's leadership from
self-righteous pride and cowardly disobedience. To avoid both demands
a mature believer with an established reputation. That good testimony
with those outside goes a long way as well. Let's just say we
had a man that wanted to be in the eldership and I made a call
to his employer and the employer said, oh yeah, he's terrible,
he's the worst guy ever. He doesn't show up on time, he
only whines and he just complains constantly. Brethren, I guarantee
you, I'm not rushing to rubber stamp him into the eldership
at that point. Now, it could be that there's
persecution. It could be that there's some underlying sort
of circumstances. The employee did faithfully take
a stand for Christ. That irritates him. We can look
through that. We can sort through that. The
first to bleed is God seems right until his neighbor comes and
examines him. I get all that, but there must be this good testimony
with those who are outside. Now, let's look finally at the
man's ability to teach. Again, that comes from verse
3. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate,
sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach." The
other qualifications describe his character. This describes
his gift. Now, it doesn't say he must be
able to teach like Charles had in Spurgeon. He must have the
familiarity with scripture the way John Calvin does. It doesn't
say that he must preach and teach in a manner that is absolutely
mind-blowing to everyone who would ever hear him. It doesn't
even necessarily emphasize he must preach every single Sunday.
But he must, as an elder in the Church of Jesus Christ, be able
to take this Word and teach it to others, whether publicly or
privately, and at times it's the private situations that often
present more of the difficulties involved. It's in a private setting
where people ask very difficult questions, so elders must be
equipped to go to the Word of God and teach from the Word of
God what is necessary. In terms of who preaches each
and every Sunday, that's going to be determined by other factors.
The size of the church, the particular giftedness of the elder, the
various needs involved in the church, division of labor, all
that stuff. That's all a given. But the bare
requirement, and again, he doesn't have to be Spurgeon, but he has
to not only internalize or assimilate the truth for himself, but he
must be able to articulate that truth to others. He must be able
to take the Word and teach. That is the requirement. As well,
the gift of teaching, as I mentioned, distinguishes or differentiates
the elder from the deacon. Look at Deacons, verse 8. Likewise,
deacons must be reverent, not double-tongued, not given to
much wine, not greedy for money, holding the mystery of the faith
with a pure conscience. They understand doctrine, they
know truth, but there is the absence of a necessity to preach
or teach on behalf of deacons. They certainly can. I think that
Acts 6 was the first deacons. We see Stephen emerge as a preacher. We see Philip emerge as a preacher.
But that's not the requisite or the required element with
reference to the diaconal ministry. It is not teaching. It is not
preaching. So that's what distinguishes
elders from deacons in the context of Christ's church. And then
the gift of teaching, that aptness or able to teach in verse 2,
is consistent with the emphasis on sound doctrine in the pastoral
epistles. Notice in 1 Timothy 4.6, if you
instruct the brethren in these things, Perhaps it could be better translated.
By instructing the brethren in these things, you will be a good
minister of Jesus Christ, nourished in the words of faith and of
the good doctrine which you have carefully followed. But reject
profane and old wives' fables and exercise yourself toward
godliness. Look at 1 Timothy 4, 13 and 14. Till I come, give attention to
reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. The reading there isn't the private
reading, the devotional reading of the minister's life. That
is the public reading of Scripture, and these other things are what
ministers do in the reading of Scripture. So, till I come, give
attention to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. Do not neglect the
gift that is in you, which was given to you by prophecy with
the laying on of the hands of the eldership. Meditate on these
things. Give yourself entirely to them.
Take that your progress may be evident to all. Take heed to
yourself and to the doctrine. Continue in them, for in doing
this you will save both yourself and those who hear you. Notice
in chapter 5 at verse 17. Let the elders who rule well
be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in
the word and doctrine. Again, this requirement of an
aptness to teach vis-a-vis 1 Timothy 3-2 is right in line and consistent
with Paul's emphasis on the role of the church as the propagator
of the truth of God's holy word. Notice in 1 Timothy 6, 2, "...and
those who have believing masters, let them not despise them because
they are brethren, but rather serve them because those who
are benefited are believers and beloved." Teach and exhort these
things. 617, command those who are rich
in this present age not to be haughty. How do pastors rule
the church? How do pastors govern the church? How do pastors lead the church? Again, it's not authoritarianism. It's not what they think is right.
It's rather what the word of God says. That is the primary
means by which the government of the church is had. It is through
the faithful proclamation of God's holy word. Notice in 2
Timothy 1.13, hold fast the pattern of sound words which you have
heard from me in faith and love which are in Christ Jesus. That
good thing which was committed to you, keep by the Holy Spirit
who dwells in us. Notice 2 Timothy 2.12, I'm sorry,
2 Timothy 2.2, Well, verse 1, you therefore,
my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus, and
the things that you have heard from me among many witnesses,
commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others
also. 2 Timothy 2.15, notice, be diligent
to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not
need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 2, 24, and
25. And a servant of the Lord must
not quarrel, but be gentle to all, able to teach. You see a
theme here? What does God want in the church? And it is intriguing that the
pastoral letters, with reference to Paul's writings, are the latest
of his letters. He doesn't deal with tongue speaking.
He doesn't deal with prophesying. He doesn't deal with what we
would call the supernatural or extraordinary gifts of the church.
He deals with the constant. He deals with the perpetual. He deals with that one thing
that is absolutely crucial that will identify and mark true churches
throughout the ages. It is the truth of God's Word. That's what elders must be able
to do. They must be able to teach that
word. Notice in 2 Timothy 3, 16 and
17, all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable
for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly
equipped for every good work. And then of course, chapter four,
verses one and two, I charge you, therefore, before God and
the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead
at His appearing and His kingdom, preach the word. Be ready in
season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort with
all longsuffering and teaching. The recurring emphasis in these
pastoral epistles, and we'll look at Titus 1.9 in just a moment,
but the recurring emphasis is on the role of elders preaching
and teaching the word. Why? Because salvation is on
the line. Faith comes by hearing and hearing
by the Word of God. You don't want to have a hack.
You don't want to have a heretic. You don't want to have somebody
clumsy in the pulpit or in a private setting teaching the Word to
the twisting and distorting of that Word so that persons don't
hear the truth and be saved. but also the maturation of the
people of God. Remember on that missionary journey,
as they return, before they appoint elders in every city, they exhort
them with reference to suffering that is consistent with the Christian
faith, but strengthening them in the faith. Brethren, what
is it that strengthens our faith? It's not necessarily one another,
though that helps in terms of our encouragement, but it's the
word of the living and true God. That's the primary emphasis.
C. H. Spurgeon made this observation.
Brethren, if you are not theologians, you are in your pastorates just
nothing at all. You may be fine rhetoricians
and be rich in polished sentences, but without knowledge of the
gospel and aptness to teach it, you are but a sounding brass
and a tinkling cymbal. In other words, it is absolutely
crucial that we do not compromise here. Now look at Titus chapter
1. Titus chapter 1. Again, the qualifications for
the elders are given in verses 5 to 9, very similar in nature. Verse 5, For this reason I left
you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that
are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded
you. if a man is blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful
children, not accused of dissipation or insubordination. For a bishop
must be blameless, as a steward of God, not self-willed, not
quick-tempered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy
for money, but hospitable, a lover of what is good, sober-minded,
just, holy, self-controlled. the gift of teaching. Verse 9,
he says, In other words, he himself has gone through a process of
being student. He himself has gone through the
process of being subject. He himself has gone through the
process of receiving and dissimulating information. And now that he
has that information, he has shown himself qualified according
to 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1. We look to him to be able to
articulate that truth to others so that they may grow, so that
they may receive that truth, so that they may indeed be filled
with the spirit of a living God. That's imperative in terms of
eldership. John Calvin says, this is the
chief gift in a bishop who is elected principally for the sake
of teaching. For the church cannot be governed
in any other way than by the word. He wishes that a bishop
should hold it fast. So as not only to be well instructed
in it, but to be constant in maintaining it. So it's not that
he just initially received it, but that he's continuing to maintain
it. What does Paul say in 1 Timothy
chapter 4? That your progress may be evident
to all. Does that mean that his speaking
ability has grown by leaps and bounds? It may mean at some point
some of that, but it means that his knowledge of theology, his
knowledge of Scripture, it's not stagnant. It's not that he
did his studies 30 years ago and now he's just going to come
and drip all of this all over the people of God. A minister
of the gospel continues to grow in his understanding. He continues
to grow in the acquisition of knowledge and information. He
seeks by the grace of God to have a breadth of understanding
in terms of scripture so that he can speak to those various
issues that come, not only in a public pulpit ministry, but
in a private setting. because there's a whole host
of strange things that will come upon a pastor's ears, and if
he is not in tune with the Word of God, he is going to give bad
counsel. That's why elders must be apt
to teach. But then notice what Paul says
in verse 9. Now notice the two things that
he must be able to do. By sound doctrine, that's a given,
both to exhort, the people of God who believe
what he's saying, and to convict those who contradict. Now, it's
a bit easier to exhort those who already believe what you're
saying. It's a little bit more difficult to convict those who
contradict with what you say. But this is absolutely crucial
as well. So the facility or competence that the man has with Scripture
is not only able to articulate it to those who are already sympathetic
to the plight, but also to be able to refute or shut down those
who would contradict. To be able to spot heresy and
to be able to identify heresy and to be able to deal with that
heresy. Again, this isn't child's play. Brethren, if we don't deal
faithfully in terms of biblical truth, we'll end up as Aryans.
We'll end up as some heretic. We'll end up in some compromised
position because we didn't take seriously God's clear word on
getting men to serve or function as elders in the church that
are able to teach. John Calvin again famously said
this, the pastor ought to have two voices. One for gathering
the sheep and another for warding off and driving away wolves and
thieves. Beautiful, isn't it? I remember
hearing the testimony of a particular man who retired from ministry.
He said, I spent my entire ministry telling the people of God what
they should believe. I never cautioned them as to
what they shouldn't believe. And I know that bothers people,
especially in our landscape. To speak what appears to be ill
of anybody else is severely frowned upon in our generation. Unless,
of course, you're a Christian, then everybody can speak ill
of you. That's just the way it goes. But in our context, brethren,
we don't bring up other names or competing theologies to pick
on them, but to caution so that you don't end up as a papist. so that you don't end up in some
law-denying scenario, so that you don't end up in some Christ-compromising
situation. Sometimes it is absolutely crucial
to not only affirm what we believe, but to denounce what we don't
believe. Even in that, we should practice
charity, we should have grace, we should do it with kindness
and love, but with a strictness so that we are not promoting
Jehovah's Witnesses, we're not promoting Mormonism, we're not
promoting some form of Christianity that denies the abiding validity
of God's law, or that we're affirming some neo-Nomian approach that
says Christ plies for salvation. Brethren, you need to be warned.
I need to be warned. We need to be on guard against
that sort of thing. It doesn't typically just jump
up out of nowhere and say, OK, be a heretic. It starts off very
subtle. It starts off very, at times,
unobservable. But before you know it, you're
praising some creature named Jesus with Jehovah's Witnesses
in a kingdom hall. That is horrible. And if it takes
being a little bit countercultural and identifying some things that
are patently false and wrong, then brethren, we must insist
upon doing that. Now, there's things that aren't
heresy, but there are things that aren't right either. And
should we go after them? Again, the goal is sound doctrine. The goal is the word of the living
God. The goal is to understand the
mind of God as it's revealed in Holy Scripture. And so as
Calvin says, the minister, the pastor ought to have two voices,
one for gathering the sheep and another for warding off and driving
away wolves and thieves. Well, I wanna conclude with a
few thoughts and then we'll close. First, the necessity of the qualifications. The necessity of the qualifications. We do not have the prerogative,
we do not have the right to say, we know what 1 Timothy 3 says,
we know what Titus 1 says, but we're gonna do it this way. No,
we're not. We do it the way God says it.
We do it the way God says it with other things. We don't let
women preach or exercise authority in the Church of Jesus Christ.
Why? Because we don't like women? No, because God says it. I think
there was a time when John MacArthur was preaching on the role of
women and men. There were reporters outside
of his church, because his is a very popular, big church right
there in Southern California. A reporter put a microphone in
his face and says, what do you have against women? He says,
I don't have anything against women. I'm married to one. I think that
was a great response. But that's the way it's taken
if we insist upon distinctions within genders anymore and with
role distinctions among genders. We don't, at least in this church,
have any problem with that. But when it comes to the qualifications
of elders, we can't have problems with that either. A man must
be. We don't have the right or the prerogative to change that
and make it a popularity contest. So the church should pray first
for an increase of laborers. Matthew 9, Jesus looked upon
the multitudes and he felt compassion for them. Why? Because they were
weary. They were without a shepherd.
So he tells the disciples to pray the Lord of the harvest
to raise up laborers. It's a blessed, wonderful thing.
I hope it has found its way into your prayer closets and at your
family altar that you pray for this church, you pray for Vernon,
you pray for Mike, that he may have an additional elder in his
church there in Surrey. The church secondly should know
the qualifications for elders. They should know them for deacons
as well, but that's not the subject matter this morning. You should
know what scripture says. The idea being is that when you're
praying for these sorts of things and you know what the qualifications
are, perhaps you'll start to think in terms of the men in
our church. And you might think, wow, that fellow should be an
elder. I think I'm going to mention that to Pastor Butler, somebody
we should think about and consider. Thirdly, the church should insist
that men who aspire to office meet the qualifications. Again,
it's not just you knowing the qualifications, it's us telling
a man that if you want to be in the eldership, that's a good
thing. Paul says it is. 1 Timothy 3, as long as it's
a desire born of right motives, but you must meet the qualifications. The church forth should examine
men in light of those qualifications. Go back to 1 Timothy 3 for just
a moment. 1 Timothy 3, if you're not there,
turn there. After giving the qualifications
for elders, look at what Paul says in verse 8, relative to
deacons. Likewise, deacons must be reverent,
not double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy for
money, holding the mystery of the faith with a pure conscience.
Verse 10, but let these also first be tested. There's a demand
to test men before we admit them into the diaconate. But he says
also, what's the implication? That men who enter into the eldership
are tested. In other words, it's not the
case that we don't examine them. It's not the case that we don't
survey them. It's not the case that we don't
vet them. Paul assumes that in verses one to seven. He doesn't say, okay, you gotta
have a six month testing period, but he assumes that there will
be a testing. He assumes that there will be
examination. And in light of that, he suggests
or he commands that the deacons likewise be tested. As well,
the church should exclude any and all who do not meet the qualifications. There are some tough pills in
the pastoral ministry that pastors at times have to give, or some
medicine that doesn't really taste good. You know when your
kids are little and you've got to give them something and they
go, I don't want to eat that, or I don't want to taste that,
and you graciously and gently hold them and pour it down their
gullet, because you know it's good for them. Well, there's
a few of those kinds of things in pastoral ministry that are
tough. It's tough in a marriage situation when one or the other
isn't operating the way they're supposed to be, and I have to
come and pour that medicine and say, that doesn't change your
responsibility. You always have to obey God.
It's not dependent upon whether your spouse does or not. That's
a bit of tough medicine at times. You don't want to take that.
Well, telling a man who aspires to eldership, brother, it doesn't
seem that you're called. And one of the things I'm going
to argue is that the objectivity of the process helps check the
subjectivity in the man's heart. There's an objective grid that
we operate according to so that we can deal with a man's subjective
desire to go into the ministry. And if a man's desire to go into
the ministry is legit, if it's a desire born of right motives,
he's going to listen to the objective criteria as well. That's, brethren,
my experience. But trying to tell a man that,
you know, brother, it doesn't seem like you have the gift to
teach. Perhaps you should put this on the back burner. That's
a tough piece of medicine or a tough bit of medicine for some
guys to swallow. I remember Pastor Robert Martin,
many years ago, in another context, he did some editing for a theological
journal. He said, in my experience, you
can insult a man's wife quicker and get away with it more than
insulting his writing. And when you do that, you've
crossed over a line. The same obtains with this. If
a man feels that he's fit and able to preach. And again, it's
not off, you know, one time. I would give this advice to anybody
who's ever looking for a church. Give it a couple months. I'm
sure all of you have bad days at work. Do pastors ever have
bad days at work? You might be saying, yeah, we're
having one right now, brother. But there is that experience. You really don't know what a
church is about after one visit. An eldership or a body of people
don't know how a man preaches after one sermon. It takes time,
it takes questioning. But if the prevailing wisdom
is keep your day job, the brother should listen to that and not
feel slighted. That happens way too often. It happens way too many times
that people get offended if you say, well, you don't have this
particular gift. Haven't I said in the past, it's no sin to not
have a particular gift? Paul speaks about wanting people
to remain single in 1 Corinthians 7, but acknowledges that not
everybody has the gift that he does. It's not a sin to not have
the gift of celibacy. It's a blessed thing to get married. Paul's not saying don't get married.
Paul is saying that in this capacity you'll be able to serve. But
I understand not everybody has the gift. So with reference to
this, we as a church need to be prepared to exclude any and
all who do not meet the qualifications. Remember Revelation 2.2. Church
in Ephesus, you have tested those who say they are apostles and
are not and have found them liars. The church as well, having engaged
in this, tested the man, vetted the man, seen that the man is
fit, ought to install the man so he can function in an eldership.
That's requisite also. A man's gift makes room for him. And when we observe that gift,
and we observe the consistency, and we see the qualifications
are met, we put him in the eldership, and we let him function the way
God made him to. A second thing in terms of the
man himself, the necessity of biblical churchmanship. You've
probably heard me say it before. If a man isn't faithful as a
churchman, he's not going to be good as an elder. There's
no gradation. Let me just make that conspicuous
as well. Just because somebody serves
as a deacon doesn't mean they'll serve as an elder. I think sometimes
we have that mindset. Well, you know, there's sort
of the regular rank and file member, and then there's deacon,
and then there's elder. Elders and deacons are the same. They're
on the same level. One of them actually has the
gift to teach, though. There's no stepping stone. There's
no gradation. There's no graduation. You've
gone from deacon to elder. No, some men are made by God
to be deacons. Some men are made by God to be
elders. It's a beautiful thing. But I
don't think either deacon or elder will ever be stabbed by
a man who's a lousy churchman. In other words, show up, be faithful,
do the work of a church member, and exhibit that kind of service
in the context of the local church. The man should maintain a consistent
devotional life, both privately and familial. He should be a
man of the word, not just because he wants to be an elder, but
because it's what he is. Secondly, the man should faithfully
attend the public means of grace. Again, there's providential hindrances. There are reasons why men may
miss meeting in church on a particular Sunday. But if the overarching
trajectory of a man's life is that he doesn't regularly or
faithfully or consistently attend to the public means of grace,
why would we want him to be a pastor? Maybe he won't show up on a day
that he's scheduled to preach. That would be a horrible thing,
wouldn't it? Well, you know this by way of observing his conduct
as a member. The man should love and serve
the brethren. Again, perhaps not in the same
way that elders or deacons do, but they should serve. There
should be a willingness there. As well, the man should be supportive
of the mission and ministry of the church. This seems like a
no-brainer to me, but if you don't agree with the particular
doctrinal bent of a church, or you don't agree with the particular
ecclesiastical practice of a church, and you want to be an elder there,
that just seems odd-duck-ish to me at best, and disingenuous
at worst. Find a church that you can sign
on the dotted line for every jot and tittle. Again, humanly
speaking, we don't know all the ins and outs, and there are inconsistencies
to be sure. But we want men that are supportive
of the mission and ministry of our church. And the men should
be faithful in little things. Doesn't Jesus teach that principle
to all of us? He who is faithful in little
is faithful in much. Again, brethren, if a guy doesn't show up regularly
to church, why would we want him to be an elder? If a guy
won't pick up trash in the parking lot, why would we want him to
be an elder? The guy's going to walk by some
mess in the parking lot and tell the deacons to take care of it.
That doesn't instill in me a confidence in his ability to engage in leadership. You say, well, leaders don't
pick stuff up. Oh, yes, they do. When Peter
says in 1 Peter chapter 5, be clothed with humility, do you
know what some commentators suggest? Because the verb used is the
same as in the upper room. When Jesus disrobes, not nakedly,
but in the position of the humble servant that washes the disciples'
feet. Some suggest that Peter's writing
be clothed with humility because that's in his mind. He remembers
when the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords gets down on his
knees to wash the feet of his fellow disciples. Beautiful thing. See, leadership, according to
Christ, is not, I'm too high, and I'm too noble, and I'm the
right reverend. I can't bend over and pick up
that trash. That's what we have deacons for.
That's, you know, why we pay the pastor. He's here all week. He gets to pick up all those
unsavory things. And all those unsavory things,
there are, I can assure you. There's a lot of unsavory things.
that go on in this parking lot. But brethren, servant leadership. What does Jesus say in Matthew
20, 28? The Son of Man did not come to be served, but what?
To serve and to give his life a ransom for many. See, the leadership
of the kingdom isn't, I'm too pure, holy, and noble to bend
over and pick up this trash. I'm too pure, holy, and noble
to plunge a toilet. I'm too pure, holy, and noble
to wipe down the toilet. That's not servant leadership.
Whoever wants to be first will be last. Whoever wants to be
great will be least of all and promote the brotherhood. That's
what we look for when it comes to eldership. Not prima donnas,
not prissy men, not the sort of guys that are just too delicate
to ever get their hands dirty touching a toilet. Brethren,
that's not the kind of elders we're looking for. When I mentioned
the ministers' ordinary conversation, Spurgeon had another bit. He
says, one of the reasons I suspect that our working men, you know,
the normal guys in society, don't respect ministers is because
they're so prissy, they're so effeminate, they're so not real. That's not what we're looking
for. We're looking for normal, faithful brothers that attend
church, that are good churchmen, that show an affinity to teaching
and preaching. Those are what we're looking
for. If that means we're setting the bar too high, then I've misread
the qualifications. Because that's what Paul says
we're supposed to do as the church. The man who aspires to church
office ultimately must be recognized by the church. So the objective
criteria of church does check the subjectivity of the man's
desire. He must be recognized by the
church, he must be tested by the church, and he must be approved
by the church. Our Confession says that the
way appointed by Christ for the calling of any person fitted
and gifted by the Holy Spirit unto the office of bishop or
elder in a church is that he be chosen thereunto by the common
suffrage of the church itself. In other words, it's the people
of God. And it just foist elders on you.
Behold your elder. Oh, whoa, we don't even know
him. Brethren, you need to know, you need to recognize, you need
to test, and you need to ultimately vote. And solemnly set apart
by fasting and prayer, with imposition of hands of the eldership of
the church, if there be any before constituted therein, and of a
deacon that he be chosen by the like suffrage, and set apart
by prayer, and the like imposition of hands. So those are some things
that we ought to keep in mind as we move forward relative to
eldership at the Free Grace Baptist Church. And as I mentioned last
week in the third point of application, all of this shows God's heart
toward sinners. The fact that He has purpose
to save a great multitude that no man can number, from every
tribe, tongue, people, and nation. The fact that in the eternal
decree, He has purpose to save a great multitude that no man
can number. But He achieves that by particular
means. And one of the means that He
uses is a faithful, qualified eldership that preaches and teaches
the Word of God, because faith comes by hearing, and hearing
by the Word of God. As well, that faithful ministry
will help equip the people of God so that they are doctrinally
sound, so that they are mature, so that they know how to conduct
themselves each and every day in their Christian lives, because
they've got men at the helm who are seeking to be faithful and
teaching them the truth. Again, that doesn't mitigate
the personal responsibility of every believer to read his or
her Bible, and to pray, and to have family worship, and all
that sort of thing. But the church is the instructor in terms of
the doctrine that we hold to, and brethren, that is a helpful
thing. It shows God's willingness to do His people good. Paul tells
Timothy in 2 Timothy chapter 4, do the work of an evangelist. If you're not a believer here
this morning, God instituted gospel ministry for the likes
of you. Yes, for the maturation of the
people of God, but for the calling of the non-people of God to become
the people of God. His willingness is displayed
in faithful ministry, such that when men call you to believe
the gospel and repent, that's not because they're great men.
It's because they serve a great God, and His purpose and His
design is to call you to believe and repent. Well, let us pray.
Our Father, we thank you for your word, and we thank you for
its clarity at this point of the gospel ministry. And again,
we pray that you would raise up men to serve in our churches.
We pray that you would bless men serving in churches, and
encourage and strengthen each one. And God, all over this earth,
we know there is great need in terms of the gospel of our Lord
Jesus Christ. The harvest is plentiful, but
laborers are few, so we do pray to you to raise men up Send them
forth that they may proclaim the glory of Christ, and we pray
in His most blessed name. Amen.