← Back to sermon library

Ask FGBC #13: Is There a Difference Between Our Temptations and What Jesus Faced?

Jim Butler · 2024-10-15 · 1,077 words · 7 min

Ask FGBC Anything

Summary

Qa

Christ's temptations were real and in the same categories as ours, yet were harder than Adam's because he faced them as a sinless man in a fallen, hostile world — and his obedience where Adam failed is the ground of our redemption.

The question at hand is whether the temptations Jesus faced were different in kind from those faced by fallen human beings. The discussion distinguishes between the sinless nature Christ assumed — not fallen, yet genuinely human — and the far harsher conditions under which he was tempted compared to Adam in paradise. Drawing on the Adam-Christ typology found in Luke 3–4 and Matthew, the speakers explore why the Son of God's obedience in a fallen, hostile world makes his conquest of temptation more weighty than Adam's failure in paradise.

Key quotes

He endured the same temptations that we do, not in the same way that we do, because there was no sin in his heart by which they could lay hold of who he was in his soul and cause him to sin.
Adam was driven out, but after he sinned — Jesus had all of the difficulties, the difficult road. He overcame, Adam failed.
We need to go back and look at the fall of Adam and call it what it was. It was a tragedy. The biggest tragedy of man's making.

Applications

  1. When reading Genesis 3, keep in mind that everything the serpent says is a lie — this reframes the whole narrative and sharpens vigilance against Satan's deceptions today.
  2. Do not minimise the magnitude of Adam's fall by pointing to the ease of his conditions; go back and call it what it was — the greatest tragedy of man's making.
  3. Take comfort that Christ's genuine, hard-won obedience under worse conditions than any of us face is the basis of our redemption.

Questions this sermon answers

Did Jesus face the same temptations we do?

Yes, in the same broad categories — food, power, the lure of the easy road — but without any internal sinful inclination by which temptation could take hold, and in far harsher external conditions than Adam faced.

Did Jesus assume a fallen human nature?

No. The discussion affirms that Christ assumed a sinless human nature without original sin, though he bore the common infirmities of humanity as it exists on this side of the fall.

Why was Christ's temptation harder than Adam's?

Adam was tempted in paradise with every blessing; Jesus was tempted in a wilderness, in a fallen world, with the devil as his chief enemy — making his obedience more costly and more glorious.

What does the Adam-Christ typology in Luke 3-4 show?

Luke deliberately calls Adam 'son of God' at the end of chapter 3 and then immediately narrates Jesus being driven into the wilderness, presenting Christ as the last Adam who reverses the first Adam's failure.

Who is the serpent in Genesis 3?

The devil, the liar from the beginning — not created as a liar, but from the very first human encounter with him his only instrument is deception.

Now, the next question, it's a big one, and I think it's got a lot of historical contours. Wim made a notation, it's long, it needs to be a bit edited. So I think we'll save that one for next time.

Question Introduced

So Jim, is there a difference between the temptations that we face, since we've just spoken about heaven, let's really change directions now. Is there a difference between the temptations that we face and the temptations that our Lord Jesus Christ faced?

The Nature of Christ's Temptations

Well, I suppose it depends on what is intended by the word difference. He endured the same temptations that we do, not in the same way that we do, because there was no sin in his heart by which they could lay hold of who he was in his soul and cause him to sin. Nor does it mean that he faced every single temptation that potentially we could face, but rather that his encounters with temptation were real, and he was able, by the Word of God, by the Spirit of God, to turn them away. So I'm not sure what is meant by that word difference.

If it's meant to say, were they somehow different because he was the Son of God and because he was a sinless human, I want to say, well, he endured what we endure. Good. Yes. Yeah, I would think true humanity means the temptations that are unique or common to true humanity.

Exactly. If it's not, then whatever is not, you know, assumed is not redeemed. So, Ten Commandment violations, Ten Commandment temptations, that's how I would understand it. Yeah, well, when you look at the devil coming to him in the wilderness and the Three Temptations, they are all in categories that we can easily relate to, right?

We can easily relate to, yes. Food, power, yeah. There's all those consistent things. Yeah, for sure.

I thought, just to make a book plug, it's always good to make plugs, Stephen Duby's book, Jesus and the God of Classical Theism, I thought he dealt with impeccability in a really good way. I can't sing that book's praises. He denied that our Lord assumed a fallen human nature. He did, yeah.

I'm so glad.

Christ's Assumed Nature and the Two Adams

When you think about our Lord as the last Adam, questions come up like, okay, the nature assumed by the Son of God, was it, can we liken it more unto Adam in his fallen state or us in our fallen, Adam in his pre-fall state, created state, or us in our fallen state? And our scripture and our confession acknowledges He assumed a nature like ours with infirmities. Yep, common infirmities. Except essential properties and common...

So in one sense, he kind of overlaps the two ages because I think he did assume a sinless human, no original sin in our Lord. So he has different... apparati to work with than us in one sense. But he assumed that this side of the fallen into sin with everything going on horizontally attacking him and then of course I think his chief enemy was the devil and more times than once. So it's the same.

Adam could be tempted before he fell as a sinless son of God in the image of God. Jesus could be tempted, but doesn't mean he's a sinner. But Jesus was tempted in a world not like Adam's world. So it's harder for our Lord.

Way harder, you know. The fall into sin, Adam's fall into sin, is just ridiculous. It's like, you're in paradise. What are you doing?

This is a no-brainer. That's easy for us. It was a great fall. He fell fast, hard, and I think Which all this kind of connects with the previous question.

You've got Adam in the paradise. You've got Israel in a wilderness. You've got Jesus in a wilderness. In a wilderness, yeah.

When you look at the temptation... Oh, that's all connected, yes. And he invokes the same message. Luke calls Adam the son of God in Luke 3.38.

And then chapter 4 is on... Temptations. He's driven out 40 days. Wilderness. opposite of Adam.

Adam, Israel, and Jesus in the Wilderness

Adam was driven out, but after he sinned, but Israel and 40 and, you know, it's, there's a lot, there's more. Same with Matthew. Oh yeah. My firstborn passes through the waters of baptism.

There you go, the waters of baptism. All that. There's a lot. I've told my students, I said, there's more connections than we're going to ever figure out.

And most of us aren't going to feel comfortable with all the connections that are actually there if we do figure at least more out. Yeah, it's one of those realities that Adam had all of the blessings, the easy road. Jesus had all of the difficulties, the difficult road. He overcame, Adam failed.

That's right, yeah.

Magnitude of Adam's Fall

I was reading somebody, was it, could have been Tureton, that's probably a guy, I think it was Augustine, where he said, we more applaud somebody's obedience in a difficult situation, this side of the fall into sin, than we depreciate or appreciate the magnitude of the fall. In perfect conditions. And he said, we need to go back there and say, wait a minute, he didn't have, you know, what Abraham had with Isaac on the mountain. There was a lot of pressures on Abraham.

What in the world? And he had his own heart and his own, you know, his family domestic problems. And the son he loved. And the son he loved.

Where's the sacrifice, dad? Yeah, that's a tough scene. Yeah, I think it was Augustine that was saying we need to go back and look at the fall of Adam and call it what it was. Yeah, what it was.

It was a tragedy. The biggest tragedy of man's making.

The Devil's Lies in Genesis 3

And you know who's behind it? The serpent. Who is the serpent? the devil, the liar from the beginning. By the way, the liar from the beginning, not that he was created as a liar, but from the beginning of man's experience with him, all he does is lie.

Now go back and read Genesis 3 and keep that in your head. These are lies. He's lying. This is not what God said.

And it changes the way you, anyway. I was going to say, apparati. You must read big books with lots of footnotes. That was pretty impressive.

Apparati.

Scripture References

Study notes

Theological terms

  • Assumed Nature×3
  • Federal Headship
  • Hypostatic Union
  • Impeccability
  • Infallibility of Scripture
  • Last Adam×2
  • Original Sin
  • Typology×2

People cited

  • Augustine×2
  • Stephen Duby