← Back to sermon library

Joshua 18-21

Jim Butler · 2013-12-11 · Joshua 18 · 7,805 words · 53 min

Basically, what we have in chapter 
18 to 21 is the remaining land to be divided, the cities of 
refuge, and the cities for the Levites. So I just want to read 
chapter 18, the first 10 verses, and then read chapter 21, the 
last three verses, and then we'll get started. So Joshua chapter 
18, beginning in verse 1. Now the whole congregation of 
the children of Israel assembled together at Shiloh and set up 
the tabernacle of meeting there. And the land was subdued before 
them. But there remained among the 
children of Israel seven tribes which had not yet received their 
inheritance. Then Joshua said to the children 
of Israel, How long will you neglect to go and possess the 
land which the Lord God of your fathers has given you? Pick out 
from among you three men for each tribe, and I will send them. They shall rise and go through 
the land, survey it according to their inheritance, and come 
back to me. And they shall divide it into seven parts. Judah shall 
remain in their territory on the south, and the house of Joseph 
shall remain in their territory on the north. You shall therefore 
survey the land in seven parts and bring the survey here to 
me, that I may cast lots for you here before the Lord our 
God. But the Levites have no part 
among you, for the priesthood of the Lord is their inheritance. 
And Gad, Reuben, and half the tribe of Manasseh have received 
their inheritance beyond the Jordan on the east, which Moses, 
the servant of the Lord, gave them. Then the men arose to go 
away, and Joshua charged those who went to survey the land, 
saying, Go, walk through the land, survey it, and come back 
to me, that I may cast lots for you here before the Lord in Shiloh. So the men went, passed through 
the land, and wrote the survey in a book in seven parts by cities. And they came to Joshua at the 
camp in Shiloh. Then Joshua cast lots for them 
in Shiloh before the Lord. And there Joshua divided the 
land to the children of Israel according to their divisions. 
And then chapter 21, beginning in verse 43, so the Lord gave 
to Israel all the land of which he had sworn to give to their 
fathers. And they took possession of it and dwelt in it. The Lord 
gave them rest all around. according to all that he had 
sworn to their fathers. And not a man of all their enemies 
stood against them. The Lord delivered all their 
enemies into their hand. Not a word failed of any good 
thing which the Lord had spoken to the house of Israel. All came 
to pass. Amen." Well, as I said, this 
deals with the remaining land, the cities of refuge, and then 
the cities for the Levites. We're going to look at these 
several chapters under these particular considerations. First, 
the remaining land, chapter 18, verses 1 to 10, and then the 
remaining tribes and divisions, 1811 to 1951. We won't look at 
every jot and tittle there. The Cities of Refuge, Chapter 
20, Verses 1 to 9. The Cities for the Levites is 
Chapter 21, Verses 1 to 42. And then the Faithfulness of 
God, Chapter 21, Verses 43 to 45. That's actually the theological 
center of the book itself. It summarizes the entirety of 
the book of Joshua. So let's look first at the remaining 
land, chapter 18, verses 1 to 10. Notice the primary rallying 
point where the children of Israel had been was in Gilgal. Now they're 
in Shiloh. This is the first time Shiloh 
is mentioned, at least as a formal gathering place. And it does 
seem to be the centralized place for worship prior to the monarchy. So before the monarchy and before 
the fact that Jerusalem became the central sanctuary, Shiloh, 
is mentioned several times in Joshua and in Judges, and then 
as well in 1 Samuel chapters 1 and 2, as the place where God 
is worshipped. And then note the reference to 
the tabernacle, again the first time mentioned here in the book 
of Joshua. They're in Shiloh, they set up 
the tabernacle of meeting there. If you look at 1951, You see 
another reference to the tabernacle. It's as if it's bracketing this 
entire section. It teaches us the centrality 
of God. It teaches us the centrality 
of God's house and the fact that the people rally around that. Verse 51 of chapter 19 speaks 
of Shiloh there before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle 
of meeting. And then the report is given 
in verse 2 that the land was subdued. Again, not something 
new to us in our studies here in Joshua. Several times along 
the way we see the land had rest from war. The land was subdued, 
though not perfectly. We see there's pockets and places 
along the way where there hasn't been the eradication of Canaanites, 
that does set the stage for what will happen later in the book 
of Judges. But here specifically in verse 
2 it says, the land was subdued before them. And then this problem 
is given in verse 2, but there remained among the children of 
Israel seven tribes which had not yet received their inheritance. 
So if you've been doing the math along the way, that's how many 
tribes are left. There's the seven that have yet 
to receive their tribal allotments. And then that brings us to Joshua's 
instruction in verses 3 to 10. Notice their danger. Verse 4, 
I'm sorry, verse 3. Then Joshua said to the children 
of Israel, how long will you neglect to go and possess the 
land which the Lord God of your fathers has given you? So it's 
something of a rebuke. It's something of a chiding. 
The Lord had given this land to the children of Israel. That's 
highlighted again in verse 3. We see it throughout the Pentateuch. 
We saw it throughout our studies in the book of Deuteronomy. We 
see it here in the book of Joshua, this idea that the land is a 
gift, it's grace, it's God's mercy to his people. Well, they 
still needed to act upon that. You know, sovereignty does not 
destroy responsibility. The fact that God gives this 
gift to these people doesn't mean that they need to neglect 
to go and possess the land. Rather, the fact that God gives 
them this as a gift is the motivation for them to not neglect but to 
rather go and possess the land which the Lord God of your fathers 
has given you. The seven tribes were not acting 
on the promise of God. What do we call that when people 
do not act upon the promise of God? We call that unbelief. We have a different story when 
we see Caleb, for instance, the daughters of Zelophehad, and 
later when we see the Levites. They knew that God had promised, 
they knew that God had spoken, and so they plead that promise 
and they go and pursue the particular gift that God has promised to 
that. This is a display of unbelief. How long will you neglect to 
go and possess the land which the Lord God of your fathers 
has given you?" These seven tribes were just milling about. These 
seven tribes are in a land that had been subdued. They're in 
a land that now has rest from the war And yet, they're not 
taking their tribal allotments. Unbelief and perhaps some ingratitude. When God gives a gift, he wants 
us to gratefully and thankfully and happily receive it and then 
act upon it. And as well, there might be something 
of a complacency involved. In other words, they like the 
way things are going, right? If we go and start to carve up 
the land, that means further or added responsibility. A commentator 
by the name of Ellison says the slackness blamed by Joshua may 
well have been due to an unwillingness to settle down. He says, it was 
fine to have a promised land, but the reality showed the need 
for learning new skills and engaging in hard work. That is for many 
the disappointing side of God's gifts. They are always given 
that we may serve the better. Even His rest is linked with 
a yoke, according to Matthew 11, 28 to 30. Come to me, all 
you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. And 
then the Lord Jesus says, take my yoke upon you. This idea of 
sovereignty not diminishing man's responsibility is vividly displayed 
in 2 Peter chapter 1. If you want to turn there for 
a moment, we see a similar or at least an analogy to what we 
find here with these seven tribes. The Lord God has promised to 
your fathers, the Lord God has brought you into this land, you 
have gained victory and supremacy in the land, the land is now 
subdued of all of the enemies, not They're all eradicated, but 
the land is in a position of having been conquered and subdued. You need to not neglect. You 
need to go and take the land. Notice in 2 Peter 1 verse 2, 
Grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God 
and of Jesus our Lord. As, notice verse 3, His divine 
power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness 
through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, 
by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious 
promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine 
nature having escaped the corruption that is in the world through 
lust." I mean, what a statement of God's grace! What an ascription 
of God's kindness! What a gift that has been given 
to us! He has given to us, verse 3, 
all things that pertain to life and godliness. Now notice in 
verse 5, but also for this very reason, giving all diligence, 
add to your faith virtue. to virtue knowledge, to knowledge 
self-control, to self-control perseverance, to perseverance 
godliness, to godliness brotherly kindness, and to brotherly kindness 
love. You see, the fact that God begraced 
us does not mean that we lay on the couch. The fact that God 
gives them this land, they are not to neglect the reality that 
they are to go and take the land, carve it up, and possess various 
allotments for the various tribes in Israel. These things are held 
constantly before us in the Scriptures. God's grace does not diminish 
our response or our responsibility to those blessed gifts that the 
Lord has given to us. So back to Joshua chapter 18, 
the man of God, the leader of Israel here chides them or reproves 
them. How long will you neglect to 
go and possess the land? There is a dangerous laxity, 
to use Dale Ralph Davis's term, a dangerous laxity that has settled 
in to these seven tribes. And so Joshua is motivating them. Joshua is calling them to action. 
Joshua is telling them to do what God the Lord has commanded 
in terms of carving up the land. Back to Joshua 18, we see the 
unity of Israel is stressed again in verses 5 to 7. We have seen 
this over and over and over again. The author does not want us to 
lose sight of the fact that Israel is 12 tribes. He doesn't want 
us to lose sight of the fact that this is a unified people. 
that the people of God stand or fall together. This is stressed 
in verse 5. They shall divide it into seven 
parts. Judah shall remain in their territory 
on the south. They've already gotten their 
tribal allotment. And the house of Joseph shall remain in their 
territory on the north. They've gotten their tribal allotment. 
You shall therefore survey the land in several parts and bring 
the survey here to me that I may cast lots for you here before 
the Lord our God. But the Levites have no part 
among you, for the priesthood of the Lord is their inheritance. 
And Gad, Reuben, and half the tribe of Manasseh, there's those 
three, Transjordan tribes. You see? He is stressing the 
unity of Israel. Every time he rehearses the reality 
that these several persons or these several tribes have already 
received their allotment, there is theology behind it. He's not 
just repeating himself just to repeat himself. He is stressing 
the unity of God's people. That these seven tribes are part 
of the twelve tribes of Israel. And this is held before us continuously 
here in Joshua's book. And then the authority of God 
Almighty is stressed in this whole procedure. Notice several 
times, verses 6, 8, and 10, he says that this will be done before 
the Lord. Before the Lord our God. It is 
the authority of God Most High. Remember the lot is cast into 
the lot, but it's every decision is from the Lord. We mustn't 
ever forget that with reference to this gift of the land, the 
Lord God is sovereign, not only in granting, but the Lord God 
is sovereign in partitioning and in carving it up for the 
people of Israel. And then the response to Joshua 
is in verses 8 to 10. These mapmakers, essentially 
is what they are, cartographers, they go out, they survey the 
land, they write it down in their books, they bring it back to 
Joshua and then Joshua according to verse 10 cast lots for them 
in Shiloh, here it is, before the Lord and there Joshua divided 
the land to the children of Israel according to their divisions. So that's what is stipulated 
with reference to the remaining land And that brings us to the 
remaining tribes and divisions. This is chapter 18, verses 11 
to chapter 19, verse 51. Woodstra says, verse 3, remember 
back in verse 3, I just went over it several times, the reality 
that the Lord God has given, or the Lord God of your fathers 
has given you this land. Woodstress says verse 3 has once 
again recalled the significance that the allotment has within 
the scheme of the book of Joshua. The rationale for more lengthy 
boundary descriptions lies therefore in the awareness that these boundaries 
give concrete shape to the promises of God. So as they go through 
these tribal allotments, that's what's being fleshed out. The boundaries give concrete shape 
to the promises of God. And so basically what we have 
in chapter 18, verses 11 to 28, the tribe of Benjamin. Chapter 19, verses 1 to 9, we 
have the tribe of Simeon. 19, 10 to 16, Zebulun. Issachar 
in 1917 to 23, Asher 24 to 31, Naphtali 32 to 39, and then Dan 
in verses 40 to 48 in chapter 19. So the remaining land, Joshua 
tells the seven tribes they need not neglect, rather they need 
to go in and possess the land. These cartographers or mapmakers 
go out, they survey the land, they write it down in the book, 
they bring it back to Joshua at Shiloh. Joshua then brings 
it before the Lord, or they cast the lot, and then this is the 
report. This is how the land. is to be 
distributed among the Israelites. And that brings us to chapter 
19 verses 49 and 50. Now the immediate context in 
this section is 18.1 to 19.51. But the larger context begins 
back in 13. Remember, 13-1 and following, 
13-1 to 1951, is the division of the land, the tribal allotments 
of the land. And you remember in that larger 
context, we have seen Caleb, And he's a positive example of 
faithfulness. After Caleb, the next sort of 
example that we see is a negative one. And that was the Josephite 
tribes. Remember in chapter 17, they're 
kind of whiny. This isn't enough land for us. 
Joshua said, well, then go and take more. They said, well, wait 
a minute. They've got chariots, and they're 
big and strong. And Joshua sends them out and 
says, Go and take the land. So we've got Caleb who's positive. We've got the Josephite tribes 
who are positive. We come into chapter 18, we have 
these seven tribes just sort of sitting on their hands. Another 
negative. But it ends on a positive note 
with Joshua. We have Caleb, positive, Josephite, 
negative, seven tribes, negative, Joshua, positive. The bookend 
of this large section is on the faithfulness of these two spies 
that went in Numbers 13 and 14 and did what they were supposed 
to do. They believed God and they wanted to act upon the promises 
of God. So when we get to 1949, it says, 
when they had made an end of dividing the land as an inheritance, 
according to their borders, the children of Israel gave an inheritance 
among them to Joshua, the son of Nun. According to the word 
of the Lord, they gave him the city which he asked for, Timnath-serah, 
in the mountains of Ephraim, and he built the city and dwelt 
in it. These were the inheritances which 
Eleazar the priest, Joshua the son of Nun, and the heads of 
the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel divided 
as an inheritance by lot in Shiloh before the Lord at the door of 
the tabernacle of meeting. So they made an end of dividing 
the country. So we need to understand or appreciate 
this. We've got Caleb, we've got Joshua. Remember a couple of weeks ago, 
or perhaps I think it was when we were in 14, I quoted from 
Ralph Davis, and how he said that this would have been a help 
for the time of the judges. The book of Joshua would have 
stood as a helpful encouragement to the people of Israel to conduct 
themselves in the manner of Caleb and Joshua. Don't follow the 
Josephite tribes. Don't follow these seven tribes 
that are sitting around on their hands. Rather, follow these two 
men of God who have a pedigree of faithfulness that goes all 
the way back to Kadesh Barnea in Numbers 13 and 14 when they 
originally went out to spy out the land. So again, it's not 
just history, it's not just boundaries, it's not just cities, it's theology, 
it's encouragement, it is to strengthen the people of God 
and to cause them to grow in faith. Davis says it this way 
with reference to 49 and 50, which by the way, if I haven't 
commended this to you enough, please get Davis's commentary 
on the book of Joshua. I think you'll find it very helpful 
and very encouraging. He says, so 1949 to 50, is no useless tailpiece. Though the notes are not visible 
in the text, it's really music. It is simply, great is thy faithfulness 
in a different key. It is a standing witness to the 
fact that the majority may be neither faithful nor right, Numbers 
13, 14. It is a witness to the fact that 
Yahweh keeps his promises even if he must preserve his two faithful 
men from Anakim chariots and high waters to do so. There are 
lots of lots in chapters 14 to 19. That's what he calls his 
discussion of 17 and 18 or 18 and 19, lots of lots. Lots of parcels, right? Lots of lots. He says, there 
are lots of lots in 14 to 19. As they begin with Caleb, so 
they close with Joshua. What a fulfillment of Numbers 
13 and 14. There is far more theology in 
Hebron and Timnath-serah than one usually hears. So when you 
study this particular section of the book of Joshua, what is 
being held out to us is what faithfulness looks like in terms 
of God's people. Not to say these other tribes 
are necessarily the worst things that ever lived, but those Josephite 
tribes, they grumbled. These seven tribes didn't act 
upon the promise of God. It was an expression of unfaithfulness. It was an expression of ingratitude. The faithful man of God, the 
faithful woman of God, receives the promises of God and acts 
upon them, just like Caleb does, just like the daughters of Zelophehad, 
and just like we'll see in a few moments, the Levites. They remember 
what God has spoken and they plead that promise and then they 
act upon it by the grace of God. There are lessons here. for us 
as Christian people living in this world that the Lord God 
has given us in this sack shed. That brings us third to the cities 
of refuge, chapter 20, verses 1 to 9. Chapter 20, verses 1 to 9. Remember the cities of refuge. 
They're spoken of back in Exodus 21. Numbers 35, 9 to 34 is probably 
the longest development of the cities of refuge. They're told 
again, Deuteronomy 4, 41 to 43, but then again in Deuteronomy 
19, verses 1 to 13. The cities of refuge played a very important 
part in the nation of Israel." Notice 
the command, verses 1 and 2. The Lord also spoke to Joshua, 
saying, Speak to the children of Israel, saying, Appoint for 
yourselves cities of refuge, of which I spoke to you through 
Moses. So he hearkens back to that law 
given previously in Exodus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. The land is now 
being possessed by the people and so they have to carve out 
or they have to specify these cities of refuge. The purpose 
is given in verses 3 to 6, a reminder, if you will, concerning the doctrine 
or the cities of refuge. The first thing we need to understand 
with reference to the purpose for these cities of refuge, it's 
to highlight the justice of God. You see, when God sends his people 
into the land of Canaan, they're not supposed to live like Canaanites. They're not supposed to be a 
law unto themselves. They're not supposed to engage 
in barbarism, child sacrifice, homosexuality. all manner of 
wickedness and lawlessness. They have a code spoken by the 
God of Israel on the mounts called Sinai. It is a decalogue. It is ten words. They are supposed 
to live in those boundaries. When they transgress those boundaries, 
there is a judicial system in place to punish transgressors. There is a judicial system in 
place to protect the innocent. There is a system in place so 
that society can be a decent and orderly place where people 
can raise families, where they can have jobs, where they can 
go to worship, where they can engage like civilized human beings, 
like image bearers of the living God. And so when we come to this 
situation of the cities of refuge, we need to think in terms of 
justice. One of the points of justice 
that jumps out at us is that God makes a distinction between 
murder and manslaughter. Murder and manslaughter are two 
different things. Murder assumes intent. Murder has to do with malice 
of forethought. I have hatred or enmity in my 
heart toward a person, and then I end his or her life. With reference 
to manslaughter, the idea here is accidental death. The biblical 
example is if I'm swinging my ax and my neighbor's next to 
me, and the axe head flies off and falls on his head and kills 
him, I didn't have premeditation. I didn't have evil intent. I 
didn't have malice in my heart. So as a result of having committed 
this particular act, the cities of refuge are established so 
that I can flee there and escape the Avenger of Blood. The Avenger 
of Blood would be a family member to the party that was dead. they 
would be the ones to go out and try and put to death the one 
who killed their loved one. But as well, when we get to this 
idea of the cities of refuge, it's not that any criminal could 
just wander in. I mean, what a convention that 
would be, right? You go out and you rob a liquor 
store and you shoot the owner in the head, and then you run 
to the city of refuge and say, oh, I really didn't do anything 
wrong. There's a hearing. There's a judicial process. Notice 
the text. Verse 3, the slayer who kills 
a person accidentally or unintentionally may flee there and they shall 
be a refuge from the avenger of blood. And when he flees to 
one of those cities and stands at the entrance of the gate of 
the city and declares his case in the hearing of the elders 
of that city. You see, there is a process. We saw this when we went through 
the Book of Deuteronomy. It wasn't the case that this 
was a convention for a murderer so he could escape justice. There 
was a hearing. The elders heard it. They would 
weigh the witness testimony. Remember, there were two or three 
witnesses in any capital offense or any capital crime. So it was 
all done on the up and up. So the justice of God is being 
held out in these cities. There is a distinction between 
murder. There's a distinction between murder and manslaughter. 
As well, there is a juridical process that is given here and 
specifies that there is a hearing and there is a judgment rendered. Then notice the end of verse 
4. They shall take him into the city as one of them and give 
him a place that he may dwell among them. Then if the avenger 
of blood pursues him, they shall not deliver the slayer into his 
hand because he struck his neighbor unintentionally but did not hate 
him beforehand. You see, if he was a manslayer, 
not a murderer, I know manslaughter sounds pretty brutal. It's hard 
to say manslaughter in a pleasant way. You know, it just bespeaks 
terror. But manslaughter is the conventional 
term for an unintentional act of homicide. There's no malice. There's no intent there to do 
murder. And so in this instance, if he's 
gone, he's been hurt, the elders render the verdict, he stays 
in the city of refuge, and the slayer, the avenger of blood, 
cannot kill him. But you notice something about 
this convention. The man has to stay in the city 
of refuge. That's not his home, is it? I 
mean, if he kills unintentionally over here and he has to run to 
this city of refuge, he has to stay in that city of refuge until 
something happens. He has to stay in that city of 
refuge until the high priest dies, which probably underscores 
the reality that for death, whether it be murder or accidental homicide, 
the only ransom is blood. In this case, it's not the man 
who committed the accidental homicide, but there is somebody 
who dies. When the high priest dies, then 
the man is free to leave the city of refuge and go back to 
his home. So on the one hand, it is a protection 
for him. But on the other hand, there 
is a bit of deprivation to him. And all of this to say this, 
the value of the image of God is highlighted in these cities 
of refuge. OK? Not only for the man who 
accidentally committed a homicide, his life is protected in the 
city of refuge, but for the person who died. Because the man must 
stay there until the death of the high priest, until some blood 
has been shed. This does highlight the reality 
of the sanctity of life in the image of God. Davis says it this 
way we can clearly see that the concern with these cities assumes 
a the preciousness of the unintentional manslayer's life, right? If you 
accidentally kill your neighbor, you shouldn't be put to death. 
That is God's justice. You are an innocent person in 
terms of malice, and in terms of intent, and in terms of a 
hatred in your heart. So you shouldn't be put to death. 
The city of refuge is there for you. He says, but we may not 
so clearly see that the slain man's life is presumed sacred 
as well. For the city of refuge is not 
only a place of safety for the manslayer, but also of exile. Things have to change. Even when 
you accidentally kill somebody, there's value in that person 
who's been accidentally killed. And your life is going to be 
disrupted as a result. If anything, it should teach 
us to make sure ax heads are securely fastened on our handles. It ought to teach us that we 
ought to drive in an appropriate manner. It ought to teach us 
that we ought to exercise ourselves with responsibility because if 
we kill the life of an image bearer, even if it was unintentional, 
it's still a bad thing. I mean to hit somebody with your 
car and send them into eternity would be a very difficult thing 
to have to live with. He goes on to say, he, the manslayer 
that is in the city of refuge, enjoys protection but also suffers 
penalty. He cannot, assuming the case 
was decided in his favor, return to his hometown and resume normal 
life. He must stay in the city of refuge 
until the death of the current high priest. Now that could have 
been a month, it could have been a year, it could have been several 
years, right? But you're in a city that's not 
yours. He says Trent C. Butler, this 
is a commentator in the Word Biblical Commentary series, no 
relation to Jim Butler. Trent C. Butler says, the city 
is at the same time refuge and prison. Such is the costliness 
of destroying human life. Even when that life is taken 
unintentionally, the consequences of that wrong must be carried. Life made in God's image always 
remains exceedingly sacred. That was a very wonderful observation. on this particular passage. He 
shall dwell in that city until he stands before the congregation 
for judgment and until the death of the one who is high priest 
in those days. Then the slayer may return and 
come to his own city and his own house to the city from which 
he fled. So you see there's a process. 
What is built in to Israel as a body politic is a system of 
justice. This is why the Canaanites are 
being dispossessed from the land. Canaanites had relations with 
animals. Canaanites engaged in sodomy. Canaanites murdered each other. 
Canaanites offered their children as sacrifices to their gods. 
Canaanites took no regard to human life. So the Lord God says, 
when you get in there and you dispossess those Canaanites from 
the land, things must be different under your watch. Things must 
be different when the people of God, covenanted with God, 
occupy the land. They need to do so in a just 
and in a righteous manner. These cities of refuge aren't 
some throwback to an archaic way of living, but rather they 
speak to the issues of justice and liberty and righteousness 
and decency that we as a society have all but forgotten. And then 
he highlights the particular locations in verses 7 to 9. Remember, they had to be available. You didn't hide the cities. They 
had to have an accessibility. These things would happen. These 
things would be necessary. put these cities in places where 
they could be reached so that if a man accidentally killed 
somebody he could run there and he could find refuge, he could 
find protection, he would not lose his life. He may lose some 
liberty for a time but he would not lose his life and at the 
death of the high priest he would be able to return home once again. Verse 9 summarizes the cities 
of refuge. These were the cities appointed 
for all the children of Israel and for the stranger who dwelt 
among them, that whoever killed a person accidentally might flee 
there and not die by the hand of the avenger of blood until 
he stood before the congregation. And then the next section, verses 
1 to 42, is the cities for the Levites. Notice, verses 1 to 
3, their claim. Then the heads of the fathers' 
houses of the Levites came near to Eleazar the priest, to Joshua 
the son of Nun, and to the heads of the fathers' houses of the 
tribes of the children of Israel. And they spoke to them at Shiloh 
in the land of Canaan, saying, The Lord commanded through Moses 
to give us cities to dwell in, with their common lands for our 
livestock. So the children of Israel gave 
to the Levites from their inheritance, at the commandment of the Lord 
these cities and their common land." So the precedent is in 
Numbers 35 verses 1 to 8, these cities for the Levites. The precedent is further established 
or at least seen or illustrated in Joshua 13 and 14. They've been told along the way 
that the Levites do not get a tribal allotment. They will get cities 
in the land to be sure, but they don't have a piece. If you look 
at your map, the division of the land, you don't see a big 
circle or a big square or a big shape that says Levi in the middle 
of it. They did not get that in terms 
of a tribal allotment. their inheritance was the Lord 
himself. Notice as well, like Caleb, I've 
already mentioned, and like Zelophehad's daughters, the Levites plead 
the promise of God. They come, they say, the Lord 
commanded through Moses. We want what God commanded. We 
want what God promised. That's not presumption. That's 
faith. When we take God at His word 
and we bring His promises to Him, He can't but bless. That's what it's all about. When 
you pray, you plead the promises of God. I remember reading a 
Spurgeon sermon. He talks about the decrees and 
our pleas. They kind of meet each other 
on the way. What God promises, we pray back, 
and there's this blessed unity between the two, and God gives 
to His people. And then something else that 
we need to appreciate here. Notice verse 2, the Lord commanded 
through Moses to give us cities to dwell in with their common 
lands for our livestock. The Levites were charged with 
spiritual labor. This, however, did not diminish 
the need for physical sustenance. The Levites were charged with 
spiritual labor. This did not diminish the need 
for physical sustenance. They did not live on love and 
fresh air, did they? They didn't live on the blessing 
of God's people. They lived in cities, and they 
needed land for their livestock. The Levites needed these things 
in order to sustain their bodies. So just because they engage in 
the spiritual does not mean that they're disembodied spirits. 
Rather, they need breakfast, lunch, and dinner. They need 
clothes. They're not in the eschaton strumming 
harps and flying around with wings. You see why Paul in the 
New Testament says that those who preach the gospel will live 
from the gospel? Not necessarily driving big shiny 
cars and big houses and all the things that Benny Hinn has, but 
neither should they be living in a dumpster. The Levites come 
to Joshua and say, God commanded, we need these things. Then as 
well, notice verse 3, the children of Israel gave to the Levites 
from their inheritance at the commandment of the Lord these 
cities and their common lands. The determination is made in 
verses 4 to 8 and the identification in 9 to 42. But consider the 
Levites living in the cities. would have a good effect upon 
the people. One of the tasks of the Levites, 
according to the book of Deuteronomy, was to be teachers of the law. Calvin says they were appointed 
as a kind of guardian in every district to retain the people 
in the pure worship of God. They should have had a positive 
effect upon the people. They would teach. They would 
encourage. They would exhort. They would 
press upon the people the necessity for corporate worship and all 
those things. He says, it is true, they were 
everywhere strangers or sojourners, but still it was with the very 
high dignity of acting as stewards for God and preventing their 
countrymen from revolting from piety. This is the reason for 
stating so carefully how many cities they obtained from each 
tribe. They were everywhere to keep 
watch and preserve the purity of sacred rights unimpaired. another man by the name of Hugenberger. I think that's the proper pronunciation. 
The Levitical cities were meant to serve as bases of operation 
so that the Levites could better infiltrate each of the tribes 
to instruct them in Yahweh's covenant. doesn't sound that 
much different than local churches being taught by faithful shepherds, 
right? The same idea. God isn't, you 
know, he doesn't use these means that are outlandish and, you 
know, beyond our reach. He uses things that are quite 
simple and very appropriate for the people of God. Whether you're 
in Old Covenant Israel or you're in New Covenant Israel, the means 
that God has ordained are primarily or essentially the same. You 
need lots of the word, you need worship, you need the house of 
God, you need those things for your health, your well-being, 
and for your prosperity as God's holy people. So that's the cities 
of the Levites. We won't read all of those. And 
then notice the last few verses in chapter 21. As I said, this 
is the theological heart of the book. So the Lord gave to Israel 
all the land of which he had sworn to give to their fathers. 
And they took possession of it and dwelt in it. Isn't that what 
we just studied? That verse, verse 43, summarizes 
chapters 13 to 19, right? Isn't that exactly what happens 
in chapters 13 to 19? So the Lord gave to Israel all 
the land of which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and 
they took possession of it and dwelt in it. Verse 44, the Lord 
gave them rest all around according to all that he had sworn to their 
fathers. And not a man of all their enemies 
stood against them. The Lord delivered all their 
enemies into their hand. Doesn't that summarize chapters 
1 to 12? They enter the land and they 
conquer the land. You see, verses 43 to 45, if 
you have this down, you've got the whole book of Joshua. So 
that if your children or your grandchildren ever say to you, 
or somebody you meet on the street ever says, what's that book of 
Joshua all about? All you gotta do is go right 
here, because this is exactly what that book of Joshua is all 
about. And then it's underscored with 
a summary of the whole, verse 45. Not a word failed. Literally, there were no falling 
words. No misspent words. Not a word 
failed. of any good thing which the Lord 
had spoken to the house of Israel all came to pass." That's it. That's what Joshua is all about. 
You ever wonder? There it is. There's your answer. 
Before we leave this particular passage, note verse 44. Something 
that we need to appreciate. He says, the Lord gave them rest 
all around according to all that He had sworn to their fathers. 
And not a man of all their enemies stood against them. The Lord 
delivered all their enemies into their hands. The presence of 
peace does not come without the defeat of the opposition. The 
presence of peace does not come without the defeat of the opposition. Now, I think, unfortunately, 
New Testament Christians miss this. It's good that Yahweh said 
to our Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies 
your footstool. You see, we need to appreciate 
the justice of God. We need to appreciate the judgment 
of God. And we need to appreciate the 
reality that all of his enemies are going to be subdued. This is as much a new covenant 
theme as it is here. You do not have possession of 
the land. You certainly don't have rest 
in the land until your enemies are destroyed, until their throats 
are cut, and their heads are bashed in and they're bleeding 
in a ditch. That's when you get rest. You say, well, that doesn't sound 
like a New Covenant theme. May I direct you to 2 Thessalonians 
1. 2 Thessalonians 1 at verse 6. The Apostle Paul, well, let's 
back up to verse 3 so we can get the context. We are bound 
to thank God always for you, brethren, as it is fitting, because 
your faith grows exceedingly, and the love of every one of 
you all abounds toward each other, so that we ourselves boast of 
you among the churches of God for your patience and faith and 
all your persecutions and tribulations that you endure, which is manifest 
evidence of the righteous judgment of God that you may be counted 
worthy of the kingdom of God for which you also suffer." Now 
somebody out there in internet land tuning in might have thought 
that was some bizarre imagery to talk about throats cut and 
heads bashed in. Well, that's what they did in 
Canaan to dispossess the land of their enemies. And I would 
submit that that was a walk in the park for the enemies of God 
compared to what Paul says here in 2 Thessalonians 1.6. He says, since it is a righteous 
thing with God to repay with tribulation those who trouble 
you. And to give you who are troubled 
rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with 
his mighty angels in flaming fire taking vengeance on those 
who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of 
our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with 
everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and 
from the glory of his power when he comes in that day to be glorified 
in his saints and to be admired among all those who believe because 
our testimony among you was believed. So you see, in verse 44, in Joshua 
21, it gives us this principle, that God the Lord destroys the 
enemies of the Lord and of his people. And it is based on that, 
or that's one part of his comprehensive plan, to bring peace to his people. This is what the Apostle is saying 
here to the Thessalonians. This is what John speaks of in 
Revelation 21. Have you ever wondered why in 
the midst of Revelation 21 and 22, these descriptions of the 
new heavens and the new earth, we get this snapshot of what 
the wicked get? Revelation 21, some of the most 
glorious language in terms of the new heaven, new earth coming 
down out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 
And in Revelation 21.8, but the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, 
murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all 
liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire 
and brimstone, which is the second death. Now, probably there's 
a bit of a warning there. for any professing Christian 
that was tampering or entertaining the idea of maybe turning back 
or recanting. But there is a promise of blessing 
there. The new Jerusalem is going to 
be glorious because the enemies of God are gone. The new Jerusalem 
is going to be glorious because there's no abortionists there. 
Because there's no God-hating rebels there. Because there's 
nobody that's going to cut the throat of a believer because 
he's a believer. So we see in the midst of these 
descriptions of the New Jerusalem, it is imperative to understand 
the enemies are gone. They've been dealt with. They 
have been excluded. They are not going to menace 
and affect the people of God. This is an important theme or 
an important principle that we need to understand with reference 
to peace. In order to achieve peace, God 
must deal with his enemies. And we see that ultimately in 
the cross, but we see that in the new heavens and the new earth. 
which I think to some degree Joshua 21, 44 does foreshadow 
or at least intimates that there is a day coming, that rest, that 
Sabbath rest that waits for the people of God is going to be 
marked by a peace such that there are no enemies, there are no 
threats, there is no hindrance whatsoever between God and his 
people communing forever and ever together. That is a blessed 
reality. The Psalter makes clear a demarcation 
between the righteous and the unrighteous. Much of modern hymnody 
doesn't get. You're not singing about God's 
judgment upon the wicked in the modern hymns, especially the 
Jesus is my boyfriend sort. You hear nothing of the psalmist 
crying out to the Lord God Almighty for the vengeance of the Lord 
to be targeted on his people. C.S. Lewis was wrong. The imprecatory 
Psalms are for us. They are for the church. They 
are the prayers of God's people. We need to understand them. We 
need to take them. And we need to, with the Apostle 
Paul, Romans chapter 12, he says, do not avenge yourselves, but 
give place to wrath. How does the Christian do that, 
but at the throne of grace, praying the Psalms of David, that God 
will indeed take care of his enemies, just like he did in 
Canaan with those who molested the people of God in the Old 
Covenant. Well, that's Joshua 21. 18 to 21, why don't we close in 
prayer? Our Father, we thank you for 
your word and we thank you for your grace and we thank you that 
you have made us your friends. What a terrifying view that the 
godless have for the future, Lord. We thank you for your grace 
and mercy. We thank you for the Lord Jesus. 
We thank you, God, that you made him who knew no sin to be sin 
for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in him. 
We just pray now that you would go with us, that you would help 
us to learn the lessons of the possession of the land in Joshua. 
And we pray through Christ our Lord. Amen.