← Back to sermon library

Genesis 25:1-34

Jim Butler · 2019-09-11 · Genesis 25 · 7,703 words · 46 min

as we continue in our studies 
in the book of Genesis. There's several things going 
on in this particular chapter. I'll begin reading in verse 1. 
Abraham again took a wife, and her name was Keturah. And she 
bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Midan, Midian, Ishbak, and Shuah. Jokshan begot Sheba and Dedan. And the sons of Dedan were Ashurim, 
Letushim, and Lumim. And the sons of Midian were Ephah, 
Ephur, Hanok, Abida, and Eldiah. All these were the children of 
Keturah. And Abraham gave all that he 
had to Isaac. But Abraham gave gifts to the 
sons of the concubines which Abraham had. And while he was 
still living, he sent them eastward, away from Isaac his son, to the 
country of the east. This is the sum of the years 
of Abraham's life which he lived, 175 years. Then Abraham breathed 
his last and died in a good old age, an old man and full of years, 
and was gathered to his people. And his sons Isaac and Ishmael 
buried him in the cave of Machpelah, which is before Mamre in the 
field of Ephron, the son of Zohar the Hittite, the field which 
Abraham purchased from the sons of Heth. There Abraham was buried, 
and Sarah his wife. And it came to pass, after the 
death of Abraham, that God blessed his son Isaac, and Isaac dwelt 
at Ber-lehi-roi. Now this is the genealogy of 
Ishmael, Abraham's son, whom Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah's maidservant, 
bore to Abraham. And these were the names of the 
sons of Ishmael, by their names according to their generations. 
The firstborn of Ishmael, Nabazeth, then Kedar, Adbeel, Mibsum, Mishma, 
Duma, Massa, Hedar, Tima, Jeter, Naphish, and Kedema. These were 
the sons of Ishmael, and these were their names, by their towns 
and their settlements, 12 princes according to their nations. These 
were the years of the life of Ishmael, 137 years, and he breathed 
his last and died and was gathered to his people. They dwelt from 
Havilah as far as Shur, which is east of Egypt as you go toward 
Assyria. He died in the presence of all 
his brethren. This is the genealogy of Isaac, Abraham's son. Abraham 
begot Isaac. Isaac was 40 years old when he 
took Rebekah as wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Paddan 
Aram, the sister of Laban the Syrian. Now Isaac pleaded with 
the Lord for his wife, because she was barren. And the Lord 
granted his plea, and Rebekah his wife conceived. But the children 
struggled together within her, and she said, If all is well, 
why am I like this? So she went to inquire of the 
Lord. And the Lord said to her, two nations are in your womb, 
two people shall be separated from your body. One people shall 
be stronger than the other, and the older shall serve the younger. 
So when her days were fulfilled for her to give birth, indeed 
there were twins in her womb, and the first came out red. He 
was like a hairy garment all over, so they called his name 
Esau. Afterward, his brother came out, 
and his hand took hold of Esau's heel, so his name was called 
Jacob. Isaac was sixty years old when 
she bore them. So the boys grew, and Esau was 
a skillful hunter, a man of the field, but Jacob was a mild man, 
dwelling in tents. And Isaac loved Esau because 
he ate of his game, but Rebekah loved Jacob. Now Jacob cooked 
a stew, and Esau came in from the field, and he was weary. 
And Esau said to Jacob, Please feed me with that same red stew, 
for I am weary. Therefore his name was called 
Edom. But Jacob said, Sell me your birthright as of this day. 
And Esau said, Look, I am about to die, so what is this birthright 
to me? Then Jacob said, Swear to me 
as of this day. So he swore to him and sold his 
birthright to Jacob. And Jacob gave Esau bread and 
stew of lentils. Then he ate and drank, arose 
and went his way. Thus Esau despised his birthright. Amen. Well, as I said, there 
are several things going on in this particular section. We'll 
look at four things. First, the marriage of Abraham 
and Keturah in verses 1 to 6. Secondly, the death and burial 
of Abraham in verses 7 to 11. Thirdly, the genealogies of Ishmael 
and Isaac in verses 12 to 28. And then finally, the profaneness 
of Esau in verses 29 to 34. It's the apostles' word. commenting 
on this man Esau. But in terms of the marriage 
of Abraham and Keturah, we are actually starting tonight the 
story of Isaac. If you look at verse 19, this 
is the genealogy of Isaac, Abraham's son. That particular literary 
convention occurs several times in the book of Genesis. And here 
in the book of Genesis, we start the story of Isaac. This will 
continue on until Isaac's death in chapter 35 and verse 29. But it records the death of Abraham 
to show that indeed, Isaac is the patriarch. Isaac is the elect 
seed, the one in whom the promise is coming to pass. And with reference 
to the marriage of Abraham and Keturah, notice in verses 1 to 
4, it states that he married this woman named Keturah, and 
then it highlights the sons of Abraham and Keturah in verses 
2 to 4. Now, there is a bit of a question 
concerning the time frame, concerning the time frame. Is this after 
the death of Sarah? That's how most people would 
interpret, that it's after the death of Sarah. And if we compare 
the dates and the times with reference to Isaac and his life, 
this is probably, well, this is 40 years beyond when he has 
had Isaac. And so, Some have made the observation. He was no spring chicken at 100 
when he was able to sire Isaac via Sarah. And here to go with 
six additional sons with this woman Keturah, some suggest that 
he was rejuvenated by God after the birth of Isaac. Others suggest 
that he married Keturah or he took on Keturah as a concubine 
while Sarah was still alive, while Sarah was living. Now, 
I'm inclined to agree with that. That's the position of John Calvin. 
It certainly seems to be favored by John Gill, but I think there 
are several lines of thought that would validate this. In 
the first place, the narrative itself is not strictly chronological. If chapter 25 was strictly chronological, 
the death of Abraham would occur after the birth of Jacob and 
Esau. Jacob and Esau were 15 at the 
time that Abraham died. We know that Isaac himself was 
75 when Abraham died, and we know that Isaac had Jacob and 
Esau when he was 60. So there was a 15-year period 
there where Jacob and Esau would have had communion with and would 
have known Abraham. So it's not strictly chronological 
in the sense that the way that the chapter is ordered flows 
chronologically. As well, if you go back to chapter 
24, when the servant goes to find a bride for Isaac, he tells 
Laban, in verse 36, and Sarah, my master's wife, bore a son 
to my master when she was old, and to him he has given all that 
he has. Now that's recorded for us here 
in chapter 25, that he gives everything to Isaac, but the 
servant prior to this in chapter 24 already mentions this. Now, 
the birth of these six sons by Keturah would actually be more 
supernaturally amazing at his age now than Isaac's birth would 
have been some 40 years prior. And then as well, the reference 
in verse 6. Notice the plural form of concubines. But Abraham gave gifts to the 
sons of the concubines which Abraham had. He had two. He had 
Hagar and he had this Keturah. It's most likely that he took 
on this Keturah, whether before or after Hagar, but while Sarah 
herself was alive. In fact, in 1 Chronicles 1.32, 
it identifies Keturah as a concubine. Now the son's born to Keturah, 
Abraham's concubine. So it's a plural form there in 
verse 6. Yes, she's called his wife, but she's also referred 
to as a concubine, which is not uncommon in scripture. Now a 
concubine obviously had less rights than a married wife, and 
certainly the children of that particular union had basically 
no rights unless the father himself conferred good gifts upon them, 
which Abraham does give gifts to them, but the heir, the sole 
heir, is Isaac. And I think that's the point 
why the narrative is structured in this particular fashion. Waltke 
says the placement of this genealogy at the end of the Abraham story 
functions to show how Isaac, the son of promise, is the elect 
patriarch and the sole heir of the promised land. Again, the 
two views with reference to Abraham and Keturah having six sons after 
this long period of time, you know, that Isaac's grown to be 
40 and married, and then he grows to be 60 having two sons. The 
idea is that he's either A, rejuvenated physically, Or, B, he had been 
with Keturah prior to the death of Sarah. Again, it's an argument 
that I think is pretty consistent. And again, if you read John Calvin, 
you'll probably get more information to that particular end. But either 
way, we see that he had other sons. We see as well that God's 
promise to him that he would be the father of many has come 
to fruition. Now in terms of the inheritance, 
notice in verses 5 and 6, and Abraham gave all that he had 
to Isaac. That is conspicuous. That is 
the emphasis. We are to see here that Isaac 
is the elect, the seed, the promise, the chosen one, that the line 
will continue on and through. But Abraham, according to verse 
6, gave gifts to the sons of the concubines, which Abraham 
had. And while he was still living, 
he sent them eastward, away from Isaac his son, to the country 
of the east." So it's to highlight or isolate that it is Isaac alone 
that is the inheritor of the promised land. They are sent 
to the east. They are sent out and away and 
I think that foreshadows what's going to come later in terms 
of a dispossession of the Canaanites from the land so that Israel 
can inhabit the land being unmolested by those perverse influences 
of those pagans. And then notice secondly with 
reference to the death and burial of Abraham. He was 175 years. 
He certainly lived a long and a full life. When it says, and 
was gathered to his people, it probably looks beyond the physical 
grave. Because the only one he would 
be gathered to is Sarah, presently, in that particular field that 
he purchased. In fact, Matthew Poole makes 
this observation. He says that gathered to his 
people means to his godly progenitors, the former patriarchs, the congregation 
of the just in heaven, in regard of his soul. For it cannot be 
meant of his body, which was not joined with them in the place 
of burial, as the phrase is, but buried in a strange land 
where only Sarah's body lay. So most likely there's another 
reference here to what scripture tells us everywhere. There is 
life beyond this physicality that we know. And then notice 
that the burial takes place via Isaac and Ishmael. which I think 
indicates that Ishmael was still in the life of Abraham. You see 
that in verse 6. He gave gifts to the sons of 
the concubines, plural. So he didn't forget about Ishmael. He loved Ishmael, and while he 
had to send him away, it's not the case that they no longer 
had any interaction whatsoever. When he dies, it's both Isaac 
and Ishmael that are involved in burying him in that plot that 
he had purchased, for Sarah, He is going to be placed there 
as well. And then again, the emphasis 
is on the blessing of Isaac in verse 11. And it came to pass, 
after the death of Abraham, that God blessed His son Isaac. And Isaac dwelt at Ber-lehi-roi. So it's like the narrative is 
moving forward to that particular point of verse 19 where this 
is the genealogy of Isaac, this is going to occupy the narrator 
up until chapter 35 and the death of Isaac, this is the emphasis 
in the chapter. Now thirdly, we have the genealogies 
of Ishmael and Isaac. You have Ishmael It's pretty 
straightforward. We have his sons indicated to 
us, and then we have his death in verses 17 and 18. Now the 
death is recorded in precisely the same language as is Abraham's. If you look at the particular 
text, with reference to Ishmael, he breathed his last and died, 
and was gathered to his people. Now this suggested to some commentators 
that perhaps he was repentant, and perhaps he did go on into 
a heavenly rest. John Gill says this language 
is used to both good and bad men and I certainly didn't have 
the time to check all the references so I'm going to trust or defer 
to John Gill on this one and suggest this is not a sure indicator 
that Ishmael is at the marriage supper of the Lamb. But it is 
interesting language, and we do see how Ishmael isn't forsaken, 
he is not cut off, and what God had promised both to Hagar and 
to Abraham comes to pass with reference to Ishmael. So even 
in the life of Ishmael, we see the faithfulness of God Almighty. 
If you look at chapter 16 in verses 10 to 12, you have God's 
encouragement to Hagar. Remember, she's quite sad about 
all that has occurred, and the Lord God comes to encourage her 
And in Genesis 16, 10. We read, Then the angel of the 
Lord said to her, I will multiply your descendants exceedingly, 
so that they shall not be counted for multitude. And the angel 
of the Lord said to her, Behold, you are with child, you shall 
bear a son, you shall call his name Ishmael, because the Lord 
has heard your affliction. He shall be a wild man, his hand 
shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him, 
and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren. And then 
with reference to God's promise concerning Ishmael to Abraham, 
in the very next chapter. Look at verse 19. This is in 
response to Abraham saying, let it be on Ishmael. In other words, 
let this promise come to fruition upon him. and God says, No, Sarah, we'll 
bear a son, you'll call his name Isaac. I will establish My covenant 
with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his descendants after 
him. And as for Ishmael, I have heard you. Behold, I have blessed 
him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly. 
He shall beget twelve princes, and I will make him a great nation. 
So back in chapter 25, that's precisely what we see in the 
text in verse 16. These were the sons of Ishmael, 
and these were their names, by their towns and their settlements, 
twelve princes according to their nations. So God's word to concerning 
Ishmael to both Hagar and Abraham does come to pass, it is fulfilled 
by our Lord in His graciousness. And now we slow down a bit when 
we come to the genealogy of Isaac. Again, that sort of section heading. You see it there in chapter 25 
verse 12 with reference to Ishmael, but you see it here specifically 
with reference to Isaac. You see it in the creation account 
in Genesis 2 at verse 4. You see it in Genesis 5.1, Genesis 
6.9, 10.1, 11.10, 11.27, here in 25, and then again in 36.1 
and 37.2. It's the way the narrative is advanced. These are the generations 
of and then whatever the particular 
character is. It's a literary device that Moses 
uses to advance the narrative with reference to the particular 
section or particular situation or person that he is dealing 
with in this particular book. And then notice it speaks concerning 
his parents and his wife. Abraham's son, Abraham begot 
Isaac. And then in verse 20, Abraham 
was 40 years old when he took Rebekah as wife, the daughter 
of Bethuel the Syrian, of Paddan Aram, the sister of Laban the 
Syrian. Now that foreshadows or sort 
of presents or puts into our minds that this Laban the Syrian 
is going to be mentioned again. And of course he is when it comes 
to the Jacob narratives, and Jacob goes to find a wife in 
the household of Laban. And then verse 21 says, Now Isaac 
pleaded with the Lord for his wife. When you read through the 
narrative concerning Isaac, he's not the boldest fellow. In fact, 
in some respects he's a bit passive. In this particular chapter, we 
learn that he likes food and we can all probably relate to 
that to some degree or other, but he's not an overly aggressive 
sort of fellow. At this particular instance, 
however, when his wife is barren, what does he do? He seeks or 
he entreats the Lord. Now, you need to remember that 
the twins weren't born for 20 years, and I think we have a 
great example in Isaac of prevailing and earnest prayer. I think that 
Isaac was a man that certainly exemplifies what it is to pray 
to the Lord and give him no rest until he make Jerusalem a blessing 
in the world. It says in verse 21, Now Isaac 
pleaded with the Lord for his wife, because she was barren, 
And the Lord granted his plea, and Rebekah his wife conceived." 
It's a beautiful statement. It's a beautiful thing. So on 
the one hand, there's likely this natural desire in Isaac. He has a bride, and he wants 
to have children. Up until the 21st century, that's 
just kind of the way people did things. You got married, and 
you were fruitful, and you multiplied. It just was the natural flow 
of things. Well, probably just the 21st 
century, it's been around. This animosity or enmity toward 
babies in the womb has certainly preexisted that, but you get 
the point. So he has this natural inclination, 
but as well, he has this spiritual desire. He knows of this promise 
from God. He knows of a seed that the Lord 
God is raising up. And as Matthew Poole makes the 
observation, he says, he prayed as the Hebrew word signifies, 
instantly or fervently, frequently and continually, for near twenty 
years together, for so long it was between their marriage and 
the first child. He was so much concerned because 
not only his comfort but the truth of God's promise depended 
upon this mercy. And he knew very well that God's 
purpose and promise did not exclude but requires the use of all convenient 
means for their accomplishment." Again, that is a great display 
of earnest, faithful praying. I think at times with the people 
of God we pray for you know 20 minutes and we think oh that's 
you know I've really put in a lot of effort to try and ask God 
for this or 20 days or you know 20 weeks or 20 months. This is 
a 20 year period where he prays to the Lord God and God in his 
graciousness Here's his plea, and then God opens the womb. 
It also demonstrates that Isaac knew something very crucial in 
terms of who God is. God is the giver of life. This 
idea of barrenness and this idea of opening the womb, it's always 
attributed to Yahweh. He is the Lord of life. He is 
the giver of life. He is the sustainer of life. 
And so Isaac expresses faith in that God when he comes before 
Him to ask Him to open his wife's womb. And I think there is this 
contrast here between Ishmael and Isaac. Notice in verse 12, 
now this is the genealogy of Ishmael, Abraham's son, whom 
Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah's maidservant, bore to Abraham, and these were 
the names of the sons of Ishmael. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. 
We get to Isaac, this is the genealogy of Isaac, Abraham's 
son, Abraham begot Isaac. Isaac was 40 years old when he 
took Rebekah as wife. And then in verse 21, now Isaac 
pleaded with the Lord for his wife, because she was barren. 
It was the case with Isaac himself. How long did Abraham and Sarah 
wait before Isaac came along? It was a 25-year period. It's not going to be the case 
for the people of God that everything is going to come easily or it's 
going to come immediately. God encourages us to long-haul 
faithfulness and to perseverance and to steadiness. Matthew Poole 
again makes the observation, she was barren as divers of those 
holy women that were progenitors of Christ have long been, that 
it might appear that the sacred stock was propagated more by 
virtue of God's grace and promise than by the power of nature. 
I think that's a great observation. Some of this length indicates 
not just the power of nature, but the power of God in answer 
to prayer, bringing to pass the fulfillment of the promises that 
He had made. Now we move to the pregnancy 
of Rebecca in verses 21 to 28. The first thing we ought to observe 
is the identification of that which is in her womb. The children 
struggled together within her. Obviously the pro-choice, God-hating 
rebels that want to murder babies call what's going on in the womb 
the product of conception. But the product of conception 
is babies. The product of conception is 
twins. And in this particular instance 
there are twin boys. But it is intriguing. The children 
struggled together within her and she said, if all is well, 
why am I like this? I don't think this is a case 
of morning sickness or a bit of discomfort. Not that I have 
any clue what that's like, but I've lived with a woman who went 
through it five times, so I maybe have a little bit of inkling 
what it's like, but not physically myself, but certainly hearing. 
the effects of it, that there's something more going on. And 
again, we see the faith of Rebecca because she goes to God to lay 
out her burdens before the Lord. And I think that when you look 
at these narratives, there's such a live or fruitful communion 
with the living and true God that the people of God maintain. 
If all is well, why am I like this? So she went to inquire 
of the Lord. Now there's some discussion as 
to what's happening here. Did she go to a prophet? You 
know, besides her father-in-law and besides her husband, there 
probably wasn't a whole lot in terms of the prophetic word. 
It probably just means she prayed to the Lord, and then the Lord 
said to her. And again, this is programmatic 
for what will happen or occur between Edom and Israel. So these 
two sons obviously are representative of the nations that they serve, 
that they will lead. And he says, two nations are 
in your womb. Two peoples shall be separated 
from your body. One people shall be stronger 
than the other, and the older shall serve the younger. So what 
we have, the two sons are two nations, Israel and Edom. We'll know or we know that Jacob 
is later called Israel. And we know that from this particular 
narrative, Esau is also referred to as Edom, which means red. He's a hairy and most likely 
redheaded hairy sort of a fellow. And so we've got Israel and we've 
got Esau, Edom. So two people shall be separated 
from your body. One people shall be stronger 
than the other, Israel, and the older shall serve the younger. 
So the older in this respect is Esau who comes out first, 
but he ultimately will be subject or subjugated to the nation of 
Israel. You see that during the reign 
of David, he subjugates the Edomites. But certainly there is this ongoing 
issue between Edom and Israel, and it's prophesied, foretold, 
foreshadowed in this particular instance, and it's even developed 
at the very end of the chapter. We already see this struggle 
come to pass in this account with reference to the stew or 
the pottage. Now notice we have the birth 
of these twins. Verse 24, so when her days were 
fulfilled for her to give birth, indeed there were twins in her 
womb. and the first came out red. He was like a hairy garment 
all over, so they called his name Esau." That's kind of an 
interesting way to describe this precious little bundle of joy. 
I mean, when you read that, it really doesn't sound like a precious 
little bundle of joy. It's almost as if the, not the 
deck is stacked, but there's a bit of foreshadowing even here 
that Esau's not the hero of the story. Esau's not the guy that 
upon whom all the promises of God are yea and amen. Amen. Esau 
is not the progenitor in the line that will be the progenitor 
of our Lord Jesus Christ. Not that Isaac hated him, in 
fact, Isaac favored him, but in this sort of description, 
the first came out red, he was like a hairy garment all over, 
so they called his name Esau. Yeah, all the years I've been 
alive, I don't remember a baby coming out and looking like a 
hairy garment. So it just doesn't sort of bode 
well for the rest of Esau's life, but nevertheless, that's the 
way it goes. And then verse 26, after his brother came out and 
his hand took hold of Esau's heel, so his name was called 
Jacob. Isaac was 60 years old when she 
bore them. So we have Esau, hairy and likely 
a red head, and then we have the second who takes hold of 
his brother's heel. Now, Jacob literally means may 
El, that means God, protect or reward, but also signifies in 
the context one who takes the heel, and also supplanter and 
deceitful. And certainly that's sort of 
the mindset or the way that we understand this Jacob moving 
along in the narrative. We know that Jacob is the hero. We know that Jacob is the good 
guy. We know that Jacob is the son of promise. We know that 
he is certainly in the line, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but 
he's not a very sympathetic character. He's not the sort of guy you 
rally behind because he's just such a virtuous and noble fellow. When he comes to deal with Esau 
later in this particular section, it's premeditated. I don't think 
he just had this thought that, oh, maybe I can truck with him 
to get the birthright. It seems like it's all pretty 
well set up with reference to the way that Jacob is going to 
get this birthright from his brother Esau. So we have the 
growth of the twins in verses 27 and 28. So the boys grew, 
Esau was a skillful hunter, a man of the field, but Jacob was a 
mild man dwelling in tents. And Isaac loved Esau because 
he ate of his game, but Rebekah loved Jacob. So you got Jacob 
as a bit of a mama's boy, and then you've got Esau who's the 
rugged outdoorsy fellow. And of course, Isaac likes the 
rugged outdoorsy fellow because he brings him good food. Isaac 
likes a bit of meat, And Esau delivers and later on that's 
going to be the very basis upon which this deception occurs with 
reference to Jacob going before Isaac. And that brings us finally 
to the profaneness of Esau in verses 29 to 34. Again, Jacob's 
right, Jacob is the son of promise, but man, he's certainly not like 
Abraham and he's not like Lot. First of all, notice the desire 
of Esau in verses 29 and 30. Jacob cooked a stew and Esau 
came in from the field and he was weary. And Esau said to Jacob, 
please feed me with that same red stew. I think it's literally 
feed me with that red red. And likely the red red looked 
like a bowl full or a stew pot full of meat and savory items 
such that Esau would like. We get down to verse 34, and 
it turned out to be lentils. You know, there's no commentary 
in here, and there's no sort of divine sort of interpretation 
for us, but I know if I was expecting meat and I got lentils, I don't 
think I'd be the happiest camper on the face of the earth. Not 
that lentils are bad, mind you, but meat is just so much better 
and so much more satisfying. So one wonders, you know, Esau 
eats, he drank, he rose, and he went his way. But that's not 
the emphasis in the text. Notice what Esau says to Jacob 
in verse 30, "...please feed me with that same red stew, for 
I am weary, therefore his name was called Edom." Again, that 
is red. Now note Jacob's response in 
verse 31. Jacob said, "...sell me your 
birthright as of this day." Dude, your brother, he's hungry and 
he's thirsty and he's been out in the field. Could you give 
him a mess of pottage without extorting from him his birthright? 
Remember the kindness and the hospitality of Abraham in Genesis 
chapter 18, when those three men come, what does he do? He 
has a calf killed, and he prepares it, and he sets out a bounty 
for them. And even Lot. Lot is a gracious 
and a charitable and a hospitable man. Jacob missed that gene. Jacob is all about business, 
and Jacob is simply about, sell me your birthright. Wenham says, 
the way Jacob states his demand suggests long premeditation and 
a ruthless exploitation of his brother's moment of weakness. 
I mean, I think we can surmise from this interchange that Esau 
is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. He's certainly 
a man governed by his passions. He's certainly a man that displays 
what is common to so many people on the face of the earth, this 
desire for immediate gratification than this future orientation. That's his issue. He wants this 
mess of pottage now. He doesn't care about the birthright 
to come, which was extremely important to anybody and everybody 
who was living at that particular time, but he illustrates that 
immediate gratification, that government by passion, that I 
need to have this bowl of stew, I don't care what there is beyond 
this or what's in my future. I just want what I want. And 
then notice with reference to what he wants, he says sell me 
your birthright as of this day. Now the birthright afforded a 
double portion of the inheritance according to Deuteronomy 21 17. 
There was a double portion of the inheritance given to that 
one who had the birthright. As well, it was a position of 
honor in the family, and it provided for that man to be, in essence, 
the leader of the family. So it's quite a rich and good 
and blessed thing, but not for Esau. Esau just wants what he 
wants. And then notice what he says 
in verse 32. Look, I am about to die, so what 
is this birthright to me? As Wenham points out, he continues 
to prattle on pretty well, evidencing that he really isn't about to 
die. The fact that he can continue on in this debate and dialogue 
and say, just give me the mess of pottage, indicates he's not 
on death's door. He's ready to give up what he 
has in order to get what he wants. I'm about to die, so what is 
this birthright to me? And then notice the demand by 
Jacob. Swear to me as of this day. So Wenham again says, Esau prattles 
on, showing he is far from being on the point of death and exhibiting 
a careless indifference to a privilege that the ancient world held dear. 
Jacob's curt three-word reply, swear to me at once, confirms 
that he is cold and calculating, determined to cash in on his 
brother's folly. Again, we know that Jacob is 
the hero, but man, he's not the most likable hero because of 
the sorts of things that he does along the way, which I think 
develops for us or should illustrate for us sort of this larger theme 
that we find in the scripture. God uses imperfect man to advance 
his perfect plan. There is no such thing as a sterile 
instrument that God utilizes when it comes to life on this 
earth. There's a bit of Jacob in all 
of us, I'm sure. There's a bit of that sort of 
supplanting. There's a bit of that sort of calculating. There's 
that sort of coldness. Well, praise God Almighty that 
nevertheless there is forgiveness with him that he may be feared. 
As we move through the patriarchal narratives, we continually meet 
up with imperfect men. God uses imperfect man to bring 
about his perfect plan of redemption through the perfect man, the 
God-man, even the Lord Jesus Christ. So along the way, there 
may be those things that leave us a little bit thinking, wow, 
you're not functioning here with hospitality and kindness. I mean, 
isn't there another way to get this birth right than extorting 
your dying brother? At least in his mind, he's your 
dying brother in such a cold, calculating way. But nevertheless, 
it is successful as we see here in verse 33. 33 So he swore to 
him, and sold his birthright to Jacob. 34 And Jacob gave Esau 
bread and stew of lentils. Then he ate and drank, arose, 
and went his way. Now notice this. This is intriguing. 
You don't get this a lot in these Old Testament narratives. You 
don't get divine commentary that says, Thus Esau despised his 
birthright. In other words, a lot of times 
in a narrative, it doesn't always end with sort of practical implications 
or applications on how you ought to think through this particular 
narrative. And sometimes we do the best 
we can, try to glean some lessons. Some are very obvious, and we're 
pretty apt to be able to make those assertions. But here the 
bad guy in the narrative, it isn't Jacob. It isn't the cold 
calculating brother who extorts his near dying brother for a 
bowl of soup. But rather Esau is the one who 
despised his birthright and evidences what it is to want that immediate 
gratification instead of delaying it, having a future orientation 
which says that God's blessing, God's birthright or this birthright 
that ensures me a double blessing from my father's inheritance, 
which assures me leadership of the family. Those things are 
far more valuable than a bowl of soup right now. And again, 
I think that there's probably a bit of Esau in all of us as 
well. We want that immediate gratification. Now, I do want to conclude with 
a few thoughts that I think are practical in nature that hopefully 
we can glean both from this passage itself and then also from the 
New Testament. In the first place, we ought 
to appreciate, as always in any study of God's Word, the faithfulness 
of God. He's always sort of the star. He's always under the spotlight 
because He's always faithful in providing for, sustaining, 
and blessing His people. His grace in the life of Abraham 
to the very end. Abraham, the report given to 
us about Abraham dying. He lived 175 years, then Abraham 
breathed his last and died in a good old age, an old man and 
full of years and was gathered to his people. The Lord's people 
die well because the Lord is good and sustained Abraham every 
jot and tittle of the way. He sustained him every step of 
the way. Now Abraham didn't display perfection, Abraham didn't display 
that absolute perfection, but nevertheless he was a faithful 
man because he served a faithful God. As well, up to this point, 
we see that God is faithful in having given the land. Remember 
that was fundamental to the promise given to Abraham, that they would 
inherit the land of promise, this land of Canaan, and they 
have the land. Such now that Abraham drives 
out all the sons of the concubines so that they're nowhere to be 
found with reference to Isaac and the promised land. Also his 
long-term plan to bless the nations through Jesus Christ. We're getting 
closer in Genesis chapter 25 to Matthew chapter 26. It is by steps. It is incremental. The Old Testament is a book of 
promise and anticipation. And each chapter moves us forward 
to that blessed realization of the new covenant in and through 
our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the promised seed from Abraham, 
Isaac, and Jacob. One would come that would save 
His people from their sins. A second lesson is obviously 
the faith of Isaac and Rebekah. I think Isaac's pattern here 
in verse 21 is exemplary. Now Isaac pleaded with the Lord 
for his wife because she was barren. Again, he understood 
certain truths concerning God. It's God who opens the womb, 
it's God who closes the womb. And if the womb isn't open, then 
Isaac can go to God and say, please open my wife's womb so 
that we can have a baby to make us happy, but as well so that 
we can see that covenant promise move further along in and through 
an heir. and then the faithfulness of 
Rebekah. She knows of the struggle in 
her womb, so she goes to inquire of the Lord." Now when we look 
at them favoring, you know, Isaac loved Esau and Rebekah loved 
Jacob, that's not ever a good thing. You know, when a parent 
favors one, perhaps to the exclusion of others, and certainly this 
is going to produce some nasty fruit later on, at least in terms 
of the deception that is wrought, but by and large what we see 
in this chapter is faithfulness on the part of God's people. 
I think a third lesson in the New Testament helps to display 
this, is a demonstration of God's sovereignty. In Romans Chapter 
9, the Apostle Paul invokes this particular section of Scripture 
in his argument for the sovereignty of God. And in Romans chapter 9 verse 
6 he says, But it is not that the word of God has taken no 
effect. For they are not all Israel who 
are of Israel, nor are they all children, because they are the 
seed of Abraham. But in Isaac your seed shall 
be called. That is, those who are the children 
of the flesh, these are not the children of God, but the children 
of the promise are counted as the seed. For this is the word 
of promise. At this time I will come and 
Sarah shall have a son. And not only this, but when Rebekah 
also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac, for 
the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, 
that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not 
of works, but of him who calls, it was said to her, the older 
shall serve the younger, as it is written, Jacob I have loved, 
but Esau I have hated." we move through narratives and we see 
less than stellar performance, say on the part of a Jacob, we 
can reflect upon this reality. Well, it's not ultimately because 
Jacob is a great guy, but it's ultimately because God is a great 
God and God in His sovereignty God, in his decree, has purposed 
to save a great multitude which no man can number. He set his 
affection upon Jacob, and he did not do so with Esau. Jacob 
I loved, Esau I hated. And he highlights this parenthetically 
in verse 11, for the children not yet being born, nor having 
done any good or evil, that the purpose of God, according to 
election, might stand not of works, but of him who calls. So this section in Genesis 25 
is a demonstration of God's sovereignty in the hands of the Apostle Paul 
and then finally it's a demonstration of Esau's apostasy. You can turn 
to Hebrews chapter 12. Hebrews chapter 12, where this 
same man is utilized as an example and remember the context in the 
book of Hebrews. I've tried to explain it over 
the last couple of weeks. You had essentially a group of 
Jewish people that had professed saving faith in the Lord Jesus. 
The book was written prior to the destruction of the temple 
and the city of Jerusalem in AD 70. that means that there 
was still a temple standing, that means there was still a 
sacrificial system in place. And so these Jewish professors 
in Christ were being pressured, pressured to renounce Christ, 
to recant from Christ, and to go back to those old covenant 
system, that old covenant system of worship. Now notice in Hebrews 
chapter 12, verse 12, Therefore strengthen the hands which hang 
down, and the feeble knees, and make straight paths for your 
feet, so that what is lame may not be dislocated, but rather 
be healed. Pursue peace with all people, 
and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord. Looking 
carefully, lest anyone fall short of the grace of God, lest any 
root of bitterness springing up cause trouble, and by this 
many become defiled. Lest there be any fornicator 
or profane person like Esau, who for one morsel of food sold 
his birthright. So you see in the context in 
the book of Hebrews, he's saying, don't be like Esau. There was 
a momentary sort of answer to his particular problem, but in 
order to gain that, he sacrificed everything in terms of future 
bliss and glory. A very appropriate example for 
those persons under that particular pressure in the first century 
that happened to be Jews that had happened to profess faith 
in Jesus Christ. The author is saying don't be 
like him. be future-oriented, do not go 
for the immediate gratification of relief from persecution or 
pressure from friends or family or business associates. Stay 
the course, go forward, glorify God Almighty. And then he mentions 
in verse 17, for you know that afterward when he wanted to inherit 
the blessing, he was rejected. Now this applies to the Genesis 
27 passage. He was rejected, for he found 
no place for repentance, though he sought it diligently with 
tears. Now, oftentimes people will read 
that and they say, well, poor pathetic Esau, he cried and everything. He wasn't crying for the glory 
of God and for the forgiveness of his sins, he was crying because 
he didn't get the blessing. You have to see that's a big 
difference. We can cry or repent or be sad 
or upset because God's not glorifying because we're vile sinners and 
we just wanna say with the Apostle Paul, oh, wretched man that I 
am, who will deliver me from this body of death? That's one 
thing. That's a godly repentance. Those 
are godly tears. But a man crying because he didn't 
get a blessing? That's not legit. That's not 
good. Never read this passage and say, 
oh, poor pathetic Esau. He cried and everything, and 
the Lord shut him down. Yeah, he cried because he forfeited 
a great blessing and he realized what a foolish decision he had 
made. So it's not the case that this poor guy wanted God and 
God said, Oh, absolutely not, Esau. You know that afterward, 
when he wanted to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for 
he found no place for repentance, though he sought it, the blessing, 
diligently with tears. He wasn't seeking repentance. 
And again, that fits the context of the book of Hebrews in a most 
excellent way. Hebrews 6, it is impossible to 
renew them unto repentance. Hebrews 10, the same sort of 
thing. Esau is the typical or the archetypal 
heretical apostate that the scripture warns us against, or at least 
the book of Hebrews does. And so that's why I called that 
last statement the profaneness of Esau because that is precisely 
what we find in this particular passage. Well, I hope that you 
will be encouraged with who God is and who we ought to be But 
as well, we ought to be encouraged with that demonstration of God's 
sovereignty. The way that Paul uses in Romans 
chapter 9 is truly amazing and glorious. And then the way that 
he appeals to him here as the sort of archetypal apostate is, 
I think, very helpful as well. So let's close in a word of prayer. 
Father, we thank you for your word. We thank you for this book 
of Genesis and the faithfulness of God on each and every page, 
Lord. And I pray that we would see 
the lessons of the faithful people of God and seek by grace to emulate 
these things. And I pray that you would just 
bless us in our individual lives, bless the families represented 
here and throughout our church, and God, bless our church as 
a whole and help us to remain steadfast and to contend earnestly 
for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. 
Go with us now and grant us safety and grace and your peace to be 
upon us and we pray through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.