← Back to sermon library
Okay, you can turn in your Bibles
to 2 Samuel chapter 10. 2 Samuel chapter 10. I mentioned
earlier that Proverbs 28.13 sort of preached itself. The text,
He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses
and forsakes them will find mercy. That's a sermon that does preach
itself. 2 Samuel 10 is not like that. It's a bit of a difficult chapter
in terms of trying to draw out some practical lessons for us. It's pretty much a chapter dealing
with Israel's war with the Ammonites and the Syrians. But I do lean
on Calvin and Ralph Davis, so I hope that we'll get something
practical out of this chapter tonight. I'll begin reading in
chapter 10, verse one. It happened after this that the
king of the people of Ammon died, and Hanun, his son, reigned in
his place. Then David said, I will show
kindness to Hanun, the son of Nahash, as his father showed
kindness to me. So David sent by the hand of
his servants to comfort him concerning his father. And David's servants
came into the land of the people of Ammon. And the princes of
the people of Ammon said to Hanun their lord, do you think that
David really honors your father because he has sent comforters
to you? Has David not rather sent his servants to you to search
the city, to spy it out, and to overthrow it? Therefore Hanun
took David's servants, shaved off half of their beards, cut
off their garments in the middle, at their buttocks, and sent them
away. When they told David, he sent
to meet them, because the men were greatly ashamed. And the
king said, Wait at Jericho until your beards have grown, and then
return. When the people of Ammon saw
that they had made themselves repulsive to David, the people
of Ammon sent and hired the Syrians of Beth Rehob and the Syrians
of Zobah, 20,000 foot soldiers, and from the king of Maacah,
1,000 men, and from Ishtab, 12,000 men. Now when David heard of
it, he sent Joab and all the army of the mighty men. Then
the people of Ammon came out and put themselves in battle
array at the entrance of the gate. And the Syrians of Zobah,
Beth-rehob, Ishtab, and Maacah were by themselves in the field.
When Joab saw that the battle line was against him, before
and behind, he chose some of Israel's best and put them in
battle array against the Syrians. And the rest of the people he
put under the command of Abishai, his brother, that he might set
them in battle array against the people of Ammon. Then he
said, If the Syrians are too strong for me, then you shall
help me. But if the people of Ammon are
too strong for you, then I will come and help you. Be of good
courage, and let us be strong for our people and for the cities
of our God. And may the Lord do what is good
in His sight. So Joab and the people who were
with him drew near for the battle against the Syrians, and they
fled before him. When the people of Ammon saw
that the Syrians were fleeing, they also fled before Abishai
and entered the city. So Joab returned from the people
of Ammon and went to Jerusalem. When the Syrians saw that they
had been defeated by Israel, they gathered together. Then
Hadadezar sent and brought out the Syrians who were beyond the
river, and they came to Helam. And Shobak, the commander of
Hadadezar's army, went before them. When it was told David,
he gathered all Israel, crossed over the Jordan, and came to
Helam. And the Syrians set themselves in battle array against David
and fought with him. Then the Syrians fled before
Israel, and David killed 700 charioteers and 40,000 horsemen
of the Syrians, and struck Shobak, the commander of their army,
who died there. And when all the kings who were
servants to Hadadezer saw that they were defeated by Israel,
they made peace with Israel and served them. So the Syrians were
afraid to help the people of Ammon anymore. Amen. Well, as we look at this particular
chapter, there's a couple of things that we ought to notice
before we jump in. The first is that in chapter
eight, we have basically a description of all of David's battles, or
most likely all of the battles that occurred during David's
lifetime. Now chapter 10 focuses upon the Ammonites and the Syrians
and most likely amplifies or explains further what's going
on or what's already been stated in a summary fashion in chapter
8. And the story of the Ammonite
war serves as the backdrop to the story concerning David and
Bathsheba and Uriah. In fact, Ralph Davis says that
chapter 10 certainly sets the stage for chapters 11 and 12.
The Ammonite War serves as the historical background for the
David-Bathsheba-Uriah fiasco. And the end of chapter 12 brings
closure to the Ammonite problem left hanging in chapter 10 at
verse 14. So you see that this serves as
the foil for what goes on in chapters 11 and 12 in terms of
David's sin with Bathsheba. Because it was when the kings
went out to battle, David stayed back and he sent Joab out into
the battlefield. That's when he committed the
sin he committed with Bathsheba and then with Uriah. So, what
we have specifically in chapter 10 with the Ammonites and the
Syrians, I think breaks down into three sections. First, the
rejection of David's kindness in verses 1 to 5. Secondly, the
battle with David's enemies in verses 6 to 14. And then thirdly,
the subjugation of David's enemies in verses 15 to 19. Again, probably
a further description of what was given to us in summary form
in chapter 8. This is an amplified version,
most likely, of that situation. Now, note first the rejection
of David's kindness. There's a strong link between
chapters 9 and 10, and I would argue that it's strongly linked
with chapter 11. Notice in chapter 9. Now David
said, is there still anyone who is left of the house of Saul
that I may show him kindness for Jonathan's sake? Remember
last week we saw that, it's that hesed, that's that covenantal
term, that steadfast love, that love that endures and that goes
deep. David wanted to express such
kindness to the household of Jonathan, specifically to this
young man Mephibosheth. Well, in chapter 10, we have
the same emphasis from David. He has shown this hesed with
reference to Jonathan's family or Saul's family. Now he turns
his attention to his foreign policy and he says the same thing. Notice in 10.1, it happened after
this that the king of the people of Ammon died and Hanun, his
son, reigned in his place. Then David said, I will show
kindness to Hanun, the son of Nahash. as his father showed
kindness to me." That kindness is the same hesed. It is the
same thing. So we see it in chapter 9 with
reference to Saul's family. We see it in chapter 10 with
reference to David's foreign policy. When we get to chapter
11, there's an absence, a conspicuous absence of this hesed, but what
we see is David's ruthlessness in laying with Bathsheba and
then committing murder to cover this particular sin. But in chapter
10, David is functioning in an exemplary manner. It is good
for us to show kindness, not just to those whom we really
like, but to show kindness to those who are not in our sphere
of influence, those who are outside of our particular orbit. Now,
whether they had an actual covenant in place or not, I certainly
do not know. And we also don't have any record
of Nahash's kindness to David. You remember that Nahash was
the Ammonite that faced Saul at Jabesh Gilead and Nahash was
the fellow that wanted to scoop out the eyes of the Israelites
in order to subjugate them. Of course Saul and the persons
of Israel didn't quite like that idea and so they went to battle
and Saul was victorious. So Saul and Nahash were enemies. So, perhaps it was the case when
David was on the Lamb, when he was fleeing from Saul, it could
be the case that Nahash gave him safe haven or that Nahash
did something to him. We see specifically that David
says, I will show kindness to Hanun, the son of Nahash, as
his father showed kindness to me." So something was done positively
for David, and so now David wants to return the favor, and he does
so specifically to Nahash's son, who is called Hanan. And this
is also a good It's a good token to do, you know, among kings
and among those who are leaders. It is good to make these overtures
and to reach out and to engage in this sort of thing. So David
then sends a delegation. Notice in verse 2b. So David
sent by the hand of his servants to comfort him concerning his
father. And David's servants came into the land of the people
of Ammon. Now this is an official delegation. These are ambassadors
from David. This is a goodwill venture. This is a reflection of David's
heart. This is kindness in action. And
so what Hanun does throughout the course of the events is absolutely
reprehensible. It is a disgusting thing that
Hanun does in terms of listening to his counselors and turning
his attention or his wrath against these ambassadors. Notice the
rejection of David's kindness in verse 3. And the princes of
the people of Ammon said to Hanun their lord, Do you think that
David really honors your father because he has sent comforters
to you? Has David not rather sent his servants to you to search
out the city, to spy it out and overthrow it? You see what the
advisors are saying? Can't trust David. You can't
trust David's men. They didn't think for a moment
that this was legitimate hesed. They didn't think for a moment
that this was legitimate kindness. They thought this was David's
attempt to get into the city, to overtake the city, and to
bring these Ammonites into subjection. And this is what they fill Hanan's
ears with. And of course, Hanan hears them,
and he listens. And note what he does in verse
4. He took David's servants, shaved
off half of their beards. Now, this probably doesn't mean
this way, okay? If they had a beard down to here,
he didn't just, you know, give them a little bit of a trim.
Probably did it that way. So they've got half beard and
half smooth face. And then he cuts their garments,
cuts off their garments in the middle at their buttocks. So
their private parts are showing. Now, this was a great insult,
not only to these delegates, but to the king that sent them.
Listen to Vanoy. He said, the beard was a sign
of manhood. Now, don't go home tonight if
you don't have a beard and say, I'm resolved to grow a beard. There's a movement among the
young restless and reformed today that, you know, there's manliness
associated with beards and, you know, they may not be too far
off afoot because there was a story in ancient history, there was
a drunkard that was lying about and some men from another clan
or another tribe came and they shaved off his beard while he
was in this drunken stupor and it caused a war between these
two clans or tribes. So it wasn't something that men
took lightly. So Vanhoy says, the beard was
a sign of manhood and a source of pride to men in the ancient
Near East. And it was therefore a serious
insult to degrade someone's beard. This nefarious insult extended
to David and the entire nation he and his envoys represented.
So it was a diss upon them, but as well upon the entirety of
the nation, including its king. Davis says that Hannon could
hardly have inflicted a more shameful insult. The men's manliness
was both marred via the beard and exposed via the buttocks
and the private parts. So this was a great embarrassment,
a very shameful thing, a very terrible way to treat these official
delegates or envoys who have come from Israel to minister
David's kindness to this new found king. This was a terrible
decision on their behalf. So David then tells the man,
according to verse 5, to go chill in Jericho until their beards
grow back. Of course, they could fix their
garments so that they were no longer exposed. But basically,
in verse 5, when they told David, he sent to meet them because
the men were greatly ashamed. And the king said, wait at Jericho
until your beards have grown. and then return. Now we as the
reader have to imagine that things aren't going to go well for the
Ammonites. We as the reader know that David
does express hesed, he does have a kind and gentle and messianic
spirit, but we also know that David is a military leader and
as a commander of armies and as the king of Israel, he's no
pushover. When men insult his troops and
when men ultimately insult the nation, men are ultimately insulting
the living and the true God. So David is going to respond
in kind and that brings us to the battle with David's enemies
in verses 6 to 14. In the first place, the troops
are gathered in verses 6 to 8. We see the troops, the Ammonites. Notice in verse 6, they made
a stink of themselves. It's literally what it says.
When the people of Ammon saw that they had made themselves
repulsive to David, or that they stank before David. I mean, this
was a situation or an incident where they did cause a sting.
And they had made themselves repulsive to David. The people
of Ammon sent and hired the Syrians of Beth Rehob and the Syrians
of Zobah, 20,000 foot soldiers, and from the king of Maacah,
1,000 men, and from Ishtab, 12,000 men. So you see what the Ammonites
do. The Ammonites know they're going to go throw down with Israel.
And the Ammonites realized that Israel is a formidable foe. And
in order for the Ammonites to successfully meet Israel on the
field of battle, they've got to spend some money. If you read
the parallel, in 1 Chronicles 19, they paid a great deal of
money to get these Syrians. Essentially, they're mercenaries
who have come now to battle alongside the Ammonites. The Syrians were
no friends to Israel either, so they were probably chomping
at the bit to form this coalition so that together, Ammonite and
Syria can go in and destroy David and all Israel. So the troops
of this coalition is gathered together. Notice the army of
Israel gathers together in verse 7. Now, when David heard of it,
he sent out Joab, or he sent Joab and all the army of the
mighty men. Now, there could be a bit of
foreshadowing right here in chapter 10 that links us to what's going
on in chapter 11. Remember, this is a literary
work. Remember that it's a written piece of information and data. And remember that the Bible is
written in a very genius manner, and there are literary conventions
that are used, and foreshadowing is certainly a convention. Well,
here David sends Joab. If we are thinking in terms of
2 Samuel 11, we know that David sends Joab when the kings go
out to battle. This is already a foretaste that
David has sort of, not reneged, but has pulled back on being
that marshal or that military leader and commander of his troops. In this instance, he sends Joab
to take care of business. Now, Joab functions very competently
in this particular chapter. In fact, the only hint or the
only whiff of theology comes from Joab. You realize that on
this Wednesday night Bible study, we're going to learn theology
at the feet of Joab. Now we have seen Joab up to this
point and he's sort of a fickle man. He stands behind David and
he's a good soldier for David but not consistently. There are
instances and seasons and times where Joab does not carry through
and Joab does some things that are absolutely contrary to what
David wants. It was Joab who killed Abner. It was Joab who engaged in that
particular act of assassination. Joab will ultimately be put to
death because he sides with Adonijah rather than Solomon when it comes
time for David to die and when Solomon ascends the throne. But in this chapter, Joab is
a competent leader and he's also a good theologian. But at this
particular point, in verse 7, we ought to notice that David
sends this particular servant, rather than engaging in it himself. Now note, the strategy is formed,
I'm sorry, in verse 8, then basically the people of Ammon came out
and put themselves in battle array. Now, the parallel in 1
Chronicles 19 tells us this is the city of Medeba. Other scholars
say that it was Rabbah. Now, they're not contradicting
what it says clearly in 1 Chronicles, but if you compare 1 Chronicles
19 and 2 Samuel 10, you've got your work cut out for you in
terms of some numbers, in terms of some figures, in terms of
some place names. That's just not in my wheelhouse
to try and deal with this evening. But just suffice it to say, either
Medabah or Rabbah is the place where they are assembled. Now
note the specific strategy formulated in verses 9 to 12. In the first
place, it's a difficult battle for Joab. This is a difficult
battle for Joab. David sends Joab out with all
the army of the mighty men. But this is not an easy thing.
Note verse 9, when Joab saw that the battle line was against him
before and behind. He's sandwiched in by enemy invaders. He is sandwiched in by those
who are against him. This is not a happy place for
Joab to find himself. Note Joab's response in verse
9b and 10. What Joab does in order to deal
with these two contingencies is he splits his forces. Says,
he chose some of Israel's best and put them in battle array
against the Syrians. So he takes a contingency of
troops to face the Syrians. And then he takes the rest of
the troops and sends them with Abishai so that they can face
the Ammonites. And then very specifically, his
strategy is easy. Notice in verse 11, he says to
Abishai, if the Syrians are too strong for me, then you shall
help me. But if the people of Ammon are
too strong for you, then I will come and help you. Makes good
sense, doesn't it? Instead of a man being placed
between a rock and a hard place, he divides the troops, he faces
Syria, he sends Ammon, he faces the Syrians, and then Abishai
and his troops face the Ammonites. If it gets too much for me, you
come and help me. If it gets too much for you,
I will come and help you. And then that brings us specifically
to his exhortation. And this is the theology in the
chapter. Notice in verse 12. In the first
place, he encourages Abishai and arguably all of the troops
of Israel, he encourages them to be of good courage. Notice,
be of good courage and let us be strong. It's a good thing
to say. This is what we are told by God.
to Joshua when he assumes control, or reign, or rule, rather, over
the nation of Israel. He has to be of courage. He has
to be strong. This is the way you rally troops.
This is the way you exhort people as they go into battle. You don't
tell them, you know, we're really in a bad straight here, and we're
probably going to lose. No, no. You tell them, be strong. Be of good courage. You need
to realize that the fight that is before us is a good fight.
We need to wage the good warfare. This is the same sort of thing
that Paul does with Timothy in 1 and 2 Timothy. He tells Timothy
to be of good courage. He tells him to be strong. He
tells him to be faithful. Paul as well, to all Christians
everywhere in Ephesians chapter 6, tells us to be strong, to
stand in the Lord's might, to put on the full armor of God.
The people of God ought to live in light of verse 12 in 2 Samuel
10. We ought to be of good courage
and we ought to be strong. That should move the people of
God in our generation. That should cause us to do good
things for the glory of God, for the well-being of His church,
for the good of individuals in His church. Note, secondly, He
then gives something of an explanation of a just war. In fact, Calvin
calls this sermon on this section what a just war actually is.
You hear that today. Is it a just war to just go and
invade foreign peoples? Is it a just war to go take somebody's
oil or to go take somebody's loot or to go take somebody's
gold? Well, Calvin makes the argument
that 2 Samuel 10, 12 is the justification for a just war. Notice, be of
good courage and let us be strong, notice, for our people and for
the cities of our God. So the good and the welfare,
the well-being of the people in a civil polity and the glory
of God. That is the cause or that is
the justification for a legitimate war. The welfare, the well-being,
the safety, obviously, of a people in a civil polity and the glory
of God. Listen to what Gil says. He says
that the people of Israel might not be carried captive. In other
words, we are to be of good courage and we are to be strong for our
people so that they're not carried away captive, so they're not
enslaved. We just read from Mrs. Hamilton
that in China there's thousands of ladies and children that are
sold into prostitution or slavery. Well, one of the reasons that
men fight wars is so that such things don't happen. Gil says
that the people of Israel might not be carried captive and their
cities spoiled and plundered. Well, certainly we defend the
property of persons in a civil polity because the persons depend
upon that property in order to give them life. If persons come
to take away our livelihood, to take away our stuff that sustains
our very existence, well, that's an opportunity, or a time rather,
for us to engage in just defense. He says, and instead of being
cities where the people of God dwelt, and he was worshipped,
would have taken become the habitations of idolatrous heathens, and where
temples would be erected to idols, and the worship of them. These
were the arguments he used to engage them to fight manfully
for their country, the liberties and the religion of it. That's
a good observation. That's what's happening here
in 2 Samuel 10-12. Now, I don't think Joab is stating
it as if to convince a people or a Congress to go ahead and
authorize the use of force in this wartime setting, but what
he does say ought to be the motivating factor for men fighting war.
You ought to be of good courage. You ought to be strong. Why?
For our people, for their well-being, for their welfare, so our children
and so our wives do not end up as prostitutes or slaves. And
four, I love the language, the cities of our God. Remember at
this particular juncture, what we have is that the visible expression
of the kingdom of God is old covenant Israel. David is the
anointed one. David sits upon the throne. but
the kingdom is God most high. It belongs to him. And the fact
that he says, and for the cities of our God indicates or highlights
to us something of the Abrahamic promise. It was the promise made
to Abraham by God that he would give him a land. And that land
would have cities. That land would be the land that
Yahweh your God is giving you. And so what Joab says to the
people of God in this instance is to be strong for our people
and for the cities of our God. And then notice the expression
of confidence in the sovereignty of God. Look at what Joab says
at the end of verse 12. And may the Lord do what is good
in His sight. Now there's a world full of theology
in that statement. Again, Joab is an interesting
fellow. Joab has done things thus far
and will do things later that should cause us to scratch our
heads and say, man, with a commander like that supporting me, who
would need an enemy? I mean, there's some things that
Joab does that really isn't good. But in this instance, what Joab
says is absolutely right. He casts himself in dependence
upon the sovereignty of Almighty God. Now, we need to remember
that though the Word of God comes from Balaam's ass, or it comes
from Joab in this particular instance, we need to remember
that we take heed to the Word of God. The Second Helvetic Confession
says this, the preaching of the Word of God is the Word of God. Wherefore, when the Word of God
is now preached in the church by preachers lawfully called,
we believe that the very Word of God is proclaimed and received
by the faithful, that neither any other Word of God is to be
invented nor is it to be expected from heaven. And that now the
word itself, which is preached, is to be regarded. And this is
the point I want to draw from this quote. I realize that Joab
is not a preacher lawfully called. I realize that Joab is not functioning
as an apostle or an evangelist or a prophet or as a minister
of the gospel. But look at what the Helvetic
Confession goes on to say. It says, And that now, the word
itself which is preached, is to be regarded, not the minister
that preaches. For even if he be evil and a
sinner, nevertheless, the word of God remains still true and
good." Jesus says the same thing in Matthew 23. We'll see that
when we get there. tell you, but don't do what they
do. Well, how could Jesus say that?
These were immoral men. He says, don't follow their pattern.
But insofar as they accurately preach the law of Moses, of course
you do what they say. Of course you're supposed to
imbibe what they say. So back to 2 Samuel 10, we ought
to learn at the feet of Joab. He says, and may the Lord do
what is good in his sight. This is a trust. dependence upon
the very sovereignty of God. Joab doesn't know what the outcome's
going to be. You know, Joab didn't have the
rest of 2 Samuel 10. Joab didn't have 2 Samuel 11.
Joab didn't have 2 Samuel. Joab at this particular juncture
has Ammonites, you know, on the one side, and he's got Syrians
on the other side. As far as Joab knows, he's going
to be gunned down in a bloody massacre. He has no understanding
whatsoever that he is going to be victorious at this particular
juncture. But he casts himself into the
lap of divine sovereignty and may the Lord do what is right,
do what is good in his sight. Calvin says, Joab understood
that no matter how bravely he behaved, all his forces could
still do nothing unless God gave the victory. Praise God that
Joab knew that, and praise God that Joab expressed it this way.
He doesn't say, be of good cheer, let us be strong for our people
and for the cities of our God, because when we're strong for
our people and for the cities of our God, we always win battles. That's not what Joab's argument
is. He says, be strong, use the means,
the Cromwellian piece of advice, you know, pray and keep your
powder dry. Definitely, Joab wants us to
be strong, Joab wants us to be of good courage, Joab wants us
to know what we're fighting for, but Joab trusts ultimately in
the sovereignty of God. And may the Lord do what is good
in his sight. Now, Calvin goes on, and I'm
going to quote Calvin at length because I think he teases out
a very important principle in verse 12 here. He addresses the
idea that some may see a lack of trust in the statement of
Joab. I mean, if you get it for a moment, you think about it,
this, and may the Lord do what is good in his sight. I've already
said, Joab doesn't know what's going to happen. He says, may
the Lord do what is good in his sight. Some might interpret that
as Joab's not real confident that he's going to be delivered
on that day. He doesn't say, and may the Lord deliver us from
these Ammonites and Syrians. He doesn't say, and may the Lord
open up heaven and pour down hailstones upon the enemies of
Israel and rout them so that they will no longer be a problem.
He doesn't ask, or he doesn't prescribe, or he doesn't give
the method that Yahweh ought to employ. He simply throws himself,
as I said, in the lap of divine sovereignty. So Calvin deals
with this. He says that God promises His
intervention, but He doesn't tell us how He will intervene. And so what may appear on the
part of Joab as a bit of unbelief is actually a strong expression
of faith in the sovereignty of God. Calvin now, he says, well,
if someone still claims that Joab did not show that he trusted
in God, that he was not thoroughly assured of the promises of the
law, the reply to that is that God does not give particular
promises about this or that to his children. Now, I'm drawing
this out because I think we falter here. There's an element of faith
in the Christian life. If God spelled everything out
for us, every jot and tittle, every particular, every how,
every when, every where, every why, we would forget all about
Him. We are constantly cast in the
same lap of divine sovereignty that Joab found himself in. Calvin
says, We certainly have this point, which should firmly persuade
us that God will never abandon us, and that in the end He will
show that our hope in Him was not in vain, so that our faith
will not be frustrated when it rests upon His mercy and His
truth. Nevertheless, we must remain in suspense about many
things. For instance, when we ask God
for our daily bread, it is not that we are assured that He will
send us a good harvest or a great vintage. We should leave that
in His hands and patiently await what pleases Him. You see, that's
what Joab is doing, and I think that's what's important. How
many times do we pray to God and just leave it with Him? And
may the Lord do what is good in His sight, or do we give Him
15 things that we'd really appreciate it if He did it just like that?
Now, I don't think there's anything wrong with specificity in prayer.
I don't think there's anything wrong with going through the
front door of heaven and letting our petitions be made known to
God. But there has to be a balance in there somewhere. We have to
recognize that God is a sovereign being and that he doesn't work
according to our whims every step of the way. There needs
to be this reality, may the Lord do what is good in his sight.
Calvin goes on to say, we should leave that in His hands and patiently
await what pleases Him. He says, when we have any illness,
we must rest well assured that He has not forgotten us and that
we have such access to Him that in the end we will feel that
He has looked on us in pity. The promise of God should be
fully sufficient in regards to that. However, when we would
like to have the word that today or tomorrow He will restore our
health, we do not know. We are even in doubt of living
and dying. Calvin then goes on to point
out that Joab had no certainty of victory here because he had
no specific promise. There's a specific promise, brethren,
take that specific promise right back to God. But if there's not
a specific promise, we need to say with Joab, and we need to
mean it, and may the Lord do what is good in his sight. We
need to trust Romans 8.28, God does cause all things to work
for good. Now brethren, I have long been
convinced that Paul there is not speaking about good things. None of us would need any convincing
that God causes good things to work for our good. You would
not need Romans 8.28 tonight to tell you that finding a bag
of money on the side of the road is a good thing. You would affirm
that wholeheartedly. Cancer, however, you'd need some
convincing. And Paul does that with Romans
8.28. All things God causes to work for good. You see, this
is where the rubber meets the road in our appreciation of the
sovereignty of God. Are we really trusting in Him
and acknowledging His sovereign will? So Calvin then concludes,
we see, therefore, that Joab's uncertainty was not a lack of
faith, for we can certainly doubt. I don't think he's saying he's
giving us license to doubt. I think he's saying we certainly
do doubt. He says, although we embrace
the promises of God and hold them as absolutely certain and
infallible, what we doubt are the things which are not clear
to us. That is how he wants us to remain
in suspense about many things and to leave it all to his secret
counsel and his providence. In other words, if you're a control
freak like me, I mean, Rebecca just mentioned, I think I've
had this pencil as long as I've been here. Why? Because I don't
like change. That's tough when you've got
this kind of a God, because He doesn't promise that every single
day, every single issue is going to function in the same exact
way. You have to trust. You have to
cast yourself into the lap of divine sovereignty. You've got
to reckon with Romans 8.28 and internalize it and hold on to
it, even when things may argue contra or converse to what you're
seeing. I know the Scripture says that
all these things are working for good, but God, I don't see
it. Help me to see it. Help me to appreciate that the
Lord's will is supreme and that's what's happening and that's what's
good. Let me embrace it and kiss it and enjoy it, you see. I think Joab has a lot better
theology in terms of practical Calvinism than I do in many respects.
And then notice, as we ought to expect from our God, the way
that he answers is truly amazing. Notice the victory achieved in
verses 13 and 14. So Joab and the people who were
with him drew near for the battle against the Syrians and they
fled before him. That's great, isn't it? How do
you deal with Syrians? Well, they run from you. Joab
probably had a newfound confidence in 12B, and may the Lord do what
is good in his sight. He could, you know, cradle one
of his grandchildren on his knees or put one of his grandchildren
on his knees years later and say, you know, I cast myself
into the lap of divine sovereignty. I prayed to the Lord God and
the Syrians that I was facing turned around and ran. And then
when the Ammonites saw the Syrians turn around and run, the Ammonites
turned around and ran. Our God is good, isn't he? Now,
that doesn't mean every time we pray this prayer, cast ourselves
upon the sovereignty of God, all of our enemies or our Ammonites
or our Syrians are gonna run away. Name your Ammonites, name
your Syrians, pray this prayer and off they'll go. I mean, that's
the way we formulize Christianity. We take the prayer of Jabez and
we become, you know, these formulaic prayers that God enlarges our
territory. That's not what we're supposed
to do. We're supposed to reckon with the divine sovereignty and
the will of God and realize that He's got us where He wants us
and He will see us through all our challenges and difficulties,
perhaps not in the way that we would specify or even in the
way that we would like, but He has promised to never leave us
nor forsake us. It's truly an amazing section
of scripture. So the victory is achieved. Syrians
flee, Ammonites flee. That brings us to the final consideration,
the subjugation of David's enemies. They flee, but the Syrians regather.
Notice the regathering of the Syrians in verses 15 and 16.
When the Syrians saw that they had been defeated by Israel,
they gathered together. Then Hadadezer sent and brought
out the Syrians who were beyond the river, and they came to Helam.
And Shobak, the commander of Hadadezer's army, went before
them. So they gather together. Now
note what David does. This time he doesn't send Joab.
This time David goes, verse 17, when it was told David he gathered
all Israel, crossed over the Jordan, and came to Helam. And
the Syrians set themselves in battle array against David and
fought with him. Do you ever wonder when these
You know, armies around Israel will get the message that their
God fights for them and their God wins. I mean, how many Ammonites
and Syrians have to die before they realize that there is a
God in Israel? I mean, the foolishness of sin
is obviously on display in the enemies of Israel. They fight,
notice in verse 18, and the Syrians fled before Israel. David killed
700 charioteers and 40,000 horsemen of the Syrians and struck Shobak,
the commander of their army, who died there. And when all
the kings who were servants to Hadadezer saw that they were
defeated by Israel, They made peace with Israel and served
them. So you see, this is another sense.
When they become vassal to the king, they pay tribute and they
are now subject to David. He is extending the kingdom of
God on earth. So the Syrians were afraid to
help the people of Ammon. So, thus concludes the Ammonite
and Syrian War, but we will return to the Ammonite War at the end
of chapter 12. So, what we find in verse 14
in terms of the final disposition of the Ammonites, that will be
suspended until the end of chapter 12. What the author does here
is finish the Syrians for our consideration. But just a couple
of thoughts before we close. In the first place, we ought
to appreciate, as we always ought in our study of David, the typical
significance of David. The typical significance. In
other words, how he functions as a type of our Lord Jesus Christ. In the first place, the kindness
of David is expressed to a pagan king. Now, the kindness, the
hesed of David is expressed to a pagan king. Our Lord Jesus
Christ, as the second person of the triune God, as God himself,
expresses kindness to those who aren't believers, doesn't he?
In fact, Calvin develops a pretty long section on how we ought
to be like David when it comes to this sort of charity and this
sort of kindness even to pagan enemies. We ought to truly display
what Christ is all about. Christ certainly will deal with
his enemies, to be sure, but until such time as he cuts them
off and sends them to hell, the sun rises on them, the rain falls
upon them, they're unable to eat, they're unable to drink,
he expresses that kindness to his creatures, the way that David
expressed kindness to a pagan king. In the second place, and
we made this observation in chapter 8, the nations rebel against
God's anointed one. The nations rebel, in this case,
Ammonites and Syrians, they rebel against God's anointed one. Just like David says they will
against Jesus Christ, he says that in Psalm 2, David does,
and we see it played out in his earthly ministry. We see Psalm
2 applied when it comes to Herod and to Pilate. These men were
formerly enemies, but when it came to go against Jesus Christ,
they become friends. We see in Acts 4, the apostles
are praying and applying Psalm 2 to their situation, to that
reality that Herod and Pilate had conspired together against
Yahweh and against his Christ. And we see a foretaste of that
here in this Ammonite Syrian coalition against the Lord's
anointed. And then a third observation
we ought to appreciate with reference to the typical significance of
David is the life and death nature of the battle or of the war,
just like Jesus faced when his opposers conspired against him. Now, as we read through this
chapter, there's not a lot of details, isn't there? This isn't,
you know, the sort of battle story, if you were a history
buff, you would, you know, probably buy at the local bookstore. You
want, you know, big books with detailed accounts and eyewitness
accounts and, you know, body counts. We have a bit of that
in there. But, you know, some of the more bloody and epic scenes
and some of the more heroic and valiant acts, this is not reported
that way. It's pretty cut and dry. So it's
easy for us to be detached and not appreciate what's happening
here. In the same way, we often, you
know, go through the realities of Isaiah 53, you know, reminding
ourselves that Jesus was a man of sorrows and acquainted with
grief, and we read through those passion narratives without fully
appreciating the weight and the death and the horrors and the
grief that Christ entered into, or the fact that Jesus said,
my God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? I mean, he's cut
off by the Father when he's on the cross. Now, Blakey, a commentator,
makes this observation concerning David in 2 Samuel 10. He says
it requires But a very little consideration to see that the
wars which are so briefly recorded in this chapter must have been
most serious and perilous undertakings. The record of them is so short,
so unimpassioned, so simple that many readers are disposed to
think very little of them. But when we pause to think what
it was for the king of Israel to meet on foreign soil, confederates
so numerous, so powerful, and so familiar with warfare, we
cannot but see that these were tremendous wars. They were fitted
to try the faith as well as the courage of David and his people
to the very utmost." And not only David, but Joab. I mean, he's facing down Syrians
and Ammonites and he says to the people, be of good courage
and let us be strong. They needed that pep talk. They
needed that exhortation because they were standing before a formidable
foe, a formidable enemy. So with reference to the typical
significance, never let us forget what our Lord Christ went through
in terms of the opposition that was poured out upon Him, not
only from men, but from suffering the wrath of God on our behalf. As well, we ought to appreciate
the theology of Joab. Remember what Calvin said concerning
that whole idea of casting ourselves upon God's sovereignty. Davis
says this with reference to Joab. He says, there is a strange chemistry
here. Taking Joab's words into our
dilemmas may make us both more confident and less certain. Confident
in the sovereignty of God, but less certain in terms of how
it's all going to flesh itself out for us. We like the more
certain, don't we? We like to know exactly where
the daily bread is coming from. We like to know exactly how the
Syrians and the Ammonites are going to be routed. We like to
know exactly what the Lord has in purpose for us, but that's
not how it is. We don't know what's going to
happen in a day. We don't know what a day will
bring. This is why Jesus says, you know, worry about today,
don't worry about tomorrow, sufficient is the troubles for today. What
Davis goes on to say, at some point we will not see, or will
we not see, that if Yahweh will do what He thinks, that will
also be what is good for His people? If Joab stirs up our
faith, we owe him our thanks. I think that's a good observation
there on verse 12b. And then finally, I think we
ought to always appreciate when we leave a chapter like this,
the faithfulness of God. I mean, if Joab casts himself
upon divine sovereignty and God delivers him, what does that
tell us? We ought to cast ourselves upon
divine sovereignty, trusting that God will deliver us. He
may not rout our Syrians and our Ammonites in precisely the
same way, but He has promised to us to never leave us, to never
forsake us, and that He will always be our God. Well, let us pray. Our Father
in Heaven, we thank You for Your Word, and we thank You for these
chapters concerning David. We thank You for the theology
of Joab, even in this chapter tonight. And I pray that You'd
help us to get our minds and our hearts wrapped around these
things, help us to realize there's no better place than to be dependent
upon a sovereign God, a God who is caring and gracious and good,
and who has promised already in Romans 8 to work all things
for our good. We ask God that you'd help us
to walk by faith, to trust these promises, and to realize that
you will do good for your people. We ask that you would go with
us now and watch over us in the remainder of this week. Bring
us together on the Lord's day that we may worship and serve
you. And do bless the Santiago's, give them a safe trip and a blessed
time with us on this Sunday. And we pray in Jesus' name, amen.