The Council at Jerusalem, Part 2
Sermons on Acts
We started to look at the council at Jerusalem last Sunday morning. We saw the issue or the conflict or the problem addressed in verses 1 to 5. Essentially you had what was called Judaizers, those who said faith in Christ was good and necessary, but you also needed to be circumcised if you were a Gentile in order to be saved. So they're not concerned with how to facilitate Gentiles and Jews in the same church initially. The council does address that as they issue forth a decree, but initially it's a matter of salvation. They were imposing law upon Gentiles in order that those Gentiles might in fact enter into the kingdom of God. And so this was a most important subject, a most important doctrinal meeting, and I wanna read beginning in Acts 15 at verse one, and we'll read to verse 21. And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved. Therefore, when Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and dispute with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem. To the apostles and elders about this question. So being sent on their way by the church, they passed through Phoenicia and Samaria, describing the conversion of the Gentiles, and they caused great joy to all the brethren. And when they had come to Jerusalem, they were received by the church and the apostles and the elders, and they reported all things that God had done with them. But some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed rose up saying, it is necessary to circumcise them and to command them to keep the law of Moses. Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter. And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them, men and brethren, you know that a good while ago, God chose among us that by my mouth, the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Now, therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, we shall be saved in the same manner as they. Then all the multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles. And after they had become silent, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, listen to me. Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for his name. And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written. After this I will return and will rebuild the tabernacle of David, which has fallen down. I will rebuild its ruins and I will set it up, so that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord. Even all the Gentiles who are called by my name, says the Lord who does all these things. Known to God from eternity are all his works. Therefore, I judge that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God, but that we write to them to abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from things strangled, and from blood. For Moses has had throughout many generations those who preach him in every city, being read in the synagogues every Sabbath. Amen. Well, let us pray. Father in heaven, we thank you again for your written word. We know it's given by inspiration of God. that it's profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness. And we pray that Your Holy Spirit would come that He would guide and direct and lead us, that He would illumine our minds and our hearts, and that we would stand amazed again at Your glorious grace, the way that You save, not according to the works of men, because our works are polluted, but according to Your grace, and according to Your power, and according to Your sovereignty. We praise You for including us in Your redemptive plan, and we ask now that You would help us to be encouraged, and we pray through Christ our Lord, amen. Well, last time we saw, according to verse one, there were certain men in the church in Antioch. Remember that after the first missionary journey, Paul and Barnabas returned to Antioch there in Syria. They reported what God had done on that missionary journey. And in the midst of the church of Antioch, we see that there were those who thought that unless you are circumcised, according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved. Again, it was a matter of the greatest importance. do sinners enter into the presence of a thrice holy God? Well, in Antioch, you had these Judaizers. So the church in Antioch determined to send Paul and Barnabas down to Jerusalem. And at Jerusalem, they would convene a council. And at that council, they would hear the particular matters and they would address the churches. They wouldn't speak with absolute authority, but rather they would give advice, they would give encouragement to the other churches that were affected by this situation. So Paul and Barnabas arrive in Jerusalem, and we see that Judaizers were in Jerusalem as well. Notice in verse 5. So verse 1 records the Judaizers in Antioch in Syria, and then in verse 5, some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed rose up. Again, that's in the church at Jerusalem, and they said it is necessary to circumcise them and to command them to keep the law of Moses. In other words, Gentiles who believe the gospel must also be circumcised and are therefore obligated to keep the law as a means of acceptance with God Almighty. So now there are deliberations. In the first place you have Peter, which we'll look at in verses 6 to 11, and then you have Paul and Barnabas in verse 12, and then verses 13 to 21, James sort of takes the lead and institutes what they will indeed communicate to the other churches. Because James cites the prophet Amos, I want to spend a bit more time on that. So I don't want to sort of tack James on, so we'll just look at the testimony of Peter, verses 6 to 11, and then secondly, the testimony of Paul and Barnabas. But notice with reference to the testimony of Peter, before he speaks, look at verse 6. Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter. Again, theology mattered for the early church. Soteriology, or the way that sinners enter into the presence of God, was absolutely crucial. It was of vital importance that these brothers meet together and they hear the collected wisdom of the church and they make these decisions affecting the church so they can put a stop to this idea that persons can add to the finished work of Jesus Christ in order to be saved. The very thought of that is reprehensible and so this council convenes in order to put silence to it. Now notice the testimony of Peter in verses 7 to 11. Verse 7 tells us when there was or when there had been much dispute. That's a good sign. Much dispute is necessary in matters of theology. Much dispute, much debate, much confrontation, much discussion. We ought not to be the sorts of men and women that are fearful of engaging these particular things, but rather the church of Jesus Christ is for big boys and big girls who put on their theology pants and do the business of the church. It is absolutely requisite. We spend, as churches, a whole host of time talking about things that really don't matter when we should be narrowing down and articulating and distinguishing Christian doctrine that is absolutely crucial for the salvation of sinners. So there had been much dispute, and then Peter rises up. And Peter highlights three things. First, the Apostle Peter and the Gentiles Secondly, the Lord God and the Gentiles. And then thirdly, how the church should deal with the Gentiles. But note first, the Apostle Peter and the Gentiles. Look at what he says in the middle of verse 7. Peter rose up and said to them, men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. So God chose Paul ultimately to be the missionary or the apostle to the Gentiles. But the initial call of the Gentiles, God uses Peter. And we see that in the book of Acts in Acts chapter 10. Now the household of Cornelius and their conversion under the preaching of Peter happened probably about 10 years prior to this Jerusalem council. So Peter essentially is standing before them and telling them what God had done in terms of saving these Gentiles. That's crucial, isn't it? If the question is now, do we insist upon them being circumcised in order to be saved? Well, how did God do it in the past with reference to these Gentiles with Cornelius and his household? So the Lord chose that by Peter's mouth, the Gentiles would hear the gospel. Again, God gives a vision to that man Cornelius, God gives a vision to Peter the Apostle, God brings them together, and then Peter rather preaches the gospel to Cornelius and his household, and the Holy Spirit falls upon them, and then they are baptized. So what Peter is saying here is that there was no circumcision that transpired with reference to Cornelius. There was no, oh, it's good that you believe, now get circumcised, now engage in obligation to keep the entirety of the law, and then we'll baptize you. That's not how Peter operated. That's not how he proceeded. The apostle Peter had reported this to Jerusalem after it occurred. Look at Acts chapter 11. In Acts chapter 11, Peter is called upon to explain what had happened with reference to Cornelius and the Gentiles. And he brings this to a conclusion in verse 15 in Acts 11. And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them as upon us at the beginning. Then I remembered the word of the Lord, how he said, John indeed baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit. Now notice Peter, if therefore God gave them the same gift as he gave us when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could withstand God? When they heard these things, they became silent. They glorified God saying, then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life. So he's already engaged in this activity. He's already reported it in Jerusalem. So again, we might ask the question, why did this council have to be convened in order to deal with this issue? because it is a pernicious and subtle error that typically crops up when the gospel of Jesus Christ is proclaimed. This idea of grace, this idea of full and free acceptance by a sovereign God on the basis of the work of his Son, is somewhat revolutionary to the minds of sinners. We always think there must be a contribution we have to make. We always think there must be something we have to do. We always think there is an addition that we need to engage in in order for God to accept us. But the gospel is not condition. The gospel is not good advice. The gospel is good news. that God is in Christ reconciling the world to himself. The reality that God is both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. We read in Romans 4 that God justifies the ungodly. Again, that's counterintuitive. We think we ought to fix ourselves. We think we ought to do something. We think we ought to comb our hair, put on a fresh shirt, go out and obey the law, and then God will save us according to what we have contributed. But that's not the gospel. The gospel comes without condition. The gospel comes, and sinners are told, without money, without price, come buy and eat. There is nothing that we can do to contribute to this salvation, and that is what Peter is underscoring in this reference to the Gentile, Cornelius and his household. The Lord purposed that salvation would come to the Gentiles when they heard the gospel and believed. Notice at the end of verse 7. He says, God chose among us that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. Beautiful, isn't it? Not hear the word of the gospel, believe, and get circumcised, and enter into an obligation to keep the entirety of the Mosaic law in order to be saved. No, it is grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ Jesus alone, according to Scripture alone, and that redounds to the glory of God alone. The gospel is designed with that end ultimately, the glory of God Most High. So Peter rehearses the salvation of Cornelius. One commentator says, what had been required of the Gentiles was that they should hear and believe the gospel, not that they should be circumcised or commit themselves to observance of the law. Calvin agrees. He says, therefore, seeing that the Gentiles are engrafted into the people of God without circumcision and ceremonies, Peter gathereth that it was not well done to lay upon them any necessity to keep the law. In other words, Peter's testimony is impeccable. God saved these Gentiles. God gave them the Holy Spirit. God blessed them immeasurably, not based on their faith in Christ and their circumcision, but holy and alone by his grace concerning faith in our Lord Jesus. Now notice he speaks concerning the Lord God and the Gentiles in verses eight and nine. He says, God knows the heart. And this is most crucial. Look at what he says in verse 8. So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them or bore witness to them. In other words, God knew exactly what he was doing in terms of including Gentiles in his redemptive plan because he had determined to do that in eternity past. God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world. God then sent his Son in the fullness of the times, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law. God had promised and purposed to save both Jew and Gentile by our Lord Jesus Christ, and so what Peter is saying is that God knows the heart. We don't have to try and discover if somebody's circumcised. God knows the heart. He knows that they're the real deal because he made them the real deal. He bore witness to them by pouring out the spirit upon them, just as he did with the Jews. So the emphasis here is upon God's knowledge of the certainty of the Gentiles' conversion. See, with reference to this Judaizing mindset, We gotta really know, we gotta really make sure, we gotta see if they're serious. It's good they believe, but now they need to take that next step in getting circumcised. Brethren, if we append things to the gospel in a manner like that, may not be circumcision, but it may be this particular church, it may be our particular rules, it may be our particular emphases on particular cultural things. If we are adding to the gospel, we are subverting it. We are destroying it. Because if righteousness comes to the law, then Christ died in vain. And Peter's rehearsal of Gentile inclusion is making the case. So God knows the heart. God gave the Gentiles the Holy Spirit. Notice, so God who knows the heart acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us. Turn back to Acts chapter 10. Acts chapter 10, just to see this in Peter's preaching with reference to Cornelius. After the two men come together, beginning in verse 34, Peter begins to preach concerning Jesus. And he brings us to a conclusion in verse 43, where Peter says to him, to Christ, all the prophets witnessed that through his name, whoever believes in him will receive remission of sins. Whoever, whether Jew or Gentile. Again, the inclusion of the Gentiles in the covenant promises of God wasn't a new thing. This had been prophesied by God to Abraham way back in Genesis chapter 12. But the inclusion has come now after the work of our Lord Jesus Christ. And so the church is trying to figure out, how do we deal with these Gentiles that are coming in among us? Well, Peter says, when they believe, they receive the Spirit just like we did. Notice in verse 44 in Acts 10. While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision, Jews, who believed, were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. So Peter's testimony, again, is impeccable. God knows the heart. He knows what he's done in the lives of these Gentiles. He knows and bears witness that they are, in fact, the real deal. They are saved. They're not saved because of faith plus words. They're saved because they heard the gospel and they, by grace, believe the gospel. when they heard and believed, they received the Holy Spirit. And then Peter says that they ought to be baptized. Again, baptism is not another thing that we must do in order to be saved, but it comes to men or it is engaged by men after they have been saved by grace. So Peter's rehearsal concerning this man, Cornelius, is a great piece of evidence to this Jerusalem council. And then notice, he goes on to say that God made no distinction between Jew and Gentile. If you look back at Acts 15, verse nine, he made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. So the way of salvation is the same. Grace through faith in Christ Jesus. He, God, made no distinction, so why would we make a distinction? If they have received the Spirit based on the free mercy of God Almighty, then who are we to come along and append circumcision to these Gentiles so that they may be saved? If God made no distinction, purifying their hearts by faith, we ought not to make any distinction either. we ought to receive them among us as brothers in Jesus Christ who have believed the gospel and who have passed from death unto life. Instead of adding works to their sort of steam in order to be saved, let's celebrate, let's rejoice, let's praise God Almighty for what He has done in including these Gentiles in the church of the Lord Jesus Christ. Then notice what He says there at the end of verse nine. He says, purifying their hearts by faith. Since God purified Gentile hearts by faith, to call upon them to be circumcised as an act of purity is absolutely redundant. God has purified them. God has fit them. God has qualified them. And it's not based on them, it's based on His Son. It's based on the finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ. And then when it says He purified their hearts by faith, Calvin has a beautiful comment here. And I think we do well to receive it. He says, for faith does not make us clean as a virtue or quality poured into our souls. It's not that faith is a tonic that God pours into our souls and that faith somehow purifies us. That's what Calvin is saying. That's not the way we should understand it. But because it, faith, receives the cleanness which is offered in Christ. So it's grace alone through faith alone, not on account of faith, but through faith. Faith is the empty hand of the sinner receiving what God has given in and through the Lord Jesus Christ. Remember Paul in Ephesians 1, blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, we receive those blessings by faith. So faith itself is not a work. It is never the case that we're justified on account of our faith. We bring faith to the bartering table. God sees that faith and then says, oh, now I'm going to justify you based on that faith. No, it's an instrument. It's the empty hand. Foul I to the fountain fly, wash me, Savior, or I die. Nothing in my hand I bring, simply to thy cross I cling. That is the gift of God given to us according to the profusion of His grace. And so that's Peter's point. He made no distinction, purifying their hearts by faith. And now he turns his attention to the church and the Gentiles. In other words, what Peter had seen in preaching to Cornelius is what God had done in terms of saving Cornelius, and now Peter challenges, exhorts, as an apostle, encourages the church, this particular council, on how we ought to proceed. In other words, if this is what happened, if this is what God did, then we as a church stand at a crossroads and we need to make sure that we don't overstep our boundaries. Now, brethren, churches have been overstepping their boundaries ever since. Again, it may not be circumcision today, but it's something. There's always an addition. There's always a supplement. There's always something we feel we need to contribute in order to be saved. Brethren, that is not gospel. The gospel is that Christ saves to the uttermost all who draw nigh unto God through Him. It's not our works, not our efforts, not our merit, not our law-keeping, because we have none. Remember the prophet Isaiah in Isaiah 64, he says, all our righteousness is. Listen to what he's saying there. All our righteousnesses are like filthy rags in the sight of God. He doesn't say our sins are like filthy rags in the sight of God. He says our righteousness, our Sabbath compliance, our temple worship, our sacrifices, the very good things that we proffer unto God, they're like filthy rags in the sight of God. See, there's a fundamental problem when sinners choose the path of law in order to be saved. The law of God condemns. Not because the law is bad, but because our hearts are bad. That's what the gospel addresses. That's the reality that we need to appreciate. So now before he exhorts the church on how they ought to go, he first issues this challenge to the Judaizers. Remember, they're there. Verse 5 tells us some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed were there and says it is necessary that they be circumcised and that they keep the law of Moses. Notice what Peter says in verse 10. Now, therefore, why do you test God? This is no small thing, brethren. I've said it before, you've heard it before, I know you have because I've said it in your hearing. We're all different on some matters of doctrine. I dare say that if we collectively sat together this afternoon and talked about eschatology, if you found two of us that were absolutely identical, I would be absolutely amazed. I would be confounded by that. But all of that discussion notwithstanding, as long as we're all believing the gospel of Jesus Christ, we're going to go to heaven. But when it comes to believing the gospel of Jesus Christ, or when it comes to the matter of soteriology, when it comes to the matter of Job's question, how can sinful man stand before a holy God? We have to be absolutely positively correct. Because if we falter, or we fumble, or we drop the ball, or we add to the finished work of Jesus Christ, what Peter says is, is that this is to test God. If God made no distinction between Jew and Gentile, purifying their hearts by faith, then who are we to come and drive a wedge between these two peoples of God? are between these people of God. We are not to make them two people the way that Paul indicates in Ephesians 2, not to make them. He's highlighting the solidarity and the unity of God's people. So he says that this will be a testing of God. God made no distinction between Jews and Gentiles, neither should man. But then notice he highlights the imposition of the yoke of the law. Now, therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? It's just here that if we didn't have live stream going on and this was more of an informal setting, I'd say, what kind of a use of the law is the apostle addressing here? He is addressing a false or a wrong use of the law. When we impose the law as a yoke upon men's necks, in order that those men may be saved, we have transgressed. We are no longer using the law lawfully. We know it's good, 1 Timothy 1.8 tells us, if one uses it lawfully. Romans 7.12 tells us the law is good, the law is holy. The problem is with man. So the law, as it's given by God, functions to hedge in the creature from being as wicked as he can be. It serves to show man their need for the Savior. And then it instructs believers who have the Holy Spirit on how they're supposed to live each and every day. But when they take this unlawful use of the law and make it a means by which Gentiles get saved, Peter says this is to test God, and it is an imposition of a yoke that God never intended for them. Paul gives the same caution in Galatians 5.1. He says, Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage. Again, the law as it's given by God is good. It functions and does what he has purposed for it to do. But when we take that law and we use it as a means of salvation or justification, we have sinned. We now are testing God. We are now engaged in an activity that God says don't do. And the impossibility of salvation by the law. Notice what he says, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear. Have you all noticed every time you touch your face now or scratch your head? Because I do. Or you give a little cough and you're thinking everybody's going to run from you. I never thought I touched my face or head as much as I do, obviously. But with reference to this particular point, the impossibility of salvation by the law is because, in the first place, the law is demand. Does God ever say, you know, do your best, champ? We do that with our kids. Do your best, T-ball. You know, all you gotta do is hit that ball. Do your best, just do your best. God never gives us the law that way. The law comes to us commanding and demanding absolute purity and perfection. In the language of our confession of faith, it renders or rather calls us to personal, entire, exact, and perpetual obedience. Peter says neither us nor our fathers would be able to manage. We couldn't enter into heaven based on law. As well, the impossibility of the law to bring salvation, it's not only based on the demands of the law, but it's also based on the wretchedness of man's heart. Again, Paul's argument in chapter 7 in the book of Romans isn't that the law is faulty. It's not that the law's got problems. It's not that the law's a bad thing. But Paul's point there is that we've got problems. We're bad things. And if we say, hey, I'm going to try and comply with this law as dead sinners, we will never make it out of the gate. John Calvin made this observation when I say all mankind is polluted. My meaning is that we bring nothing from our mother's womb but mere filthiness and that there is no righteousness in our nature which can reconcile us to God. It's absolutely positively correct. And then the impossibility of salvation by law also contradicts God's purpose in the gospel. See, he knew when he gave that law that we wouldn't be able to satisfy those requirements. It's in that framework or context that the sending of the Son comes. Born of a woman, born what? Under the law, to do what? To redeem those under the law. Galatians 3, Christ has become a curse for us so that God could deal with the curse that remained upon us vis-a-vis the law. It's a beautiful thing. In fact, turn there to Galatians chapter 3. We looked at this passage several months ago in a Lord's Supper service, and it's Paul's point on how the law doesn't bring justification. Galatians 3 verse 10, For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse, for it is written, Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. There's that point, right? It's the law's demand. Do your best, champ. No, the law's demand is curse it is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law to do that. Again, circumcision being the most visible, circumcision being sort of the most external, but that obligates one to keep the entirety of the law of Moses. Notice what he goes on to say, but that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for the just shall live by faith. So God's purpose in the gospel was not salvation by gospel and law, but it's salvation by gospel, salvation by Christ, salvation by the life, death, and resurrection of our Lord Jesus. Verse 12, he says, yet the law is not a faith, but the man who does them shall live by them. There are contradictory purposes relative to law and gospel. They work together, there is a harmony to be sure, but in terms of our acceptance with God, If you choose the course of law, then you are invalidating the very gospel of Jesus Christ, our Lord. That's the point of the book of Galatians. Notice the blessed statement in verse 13. Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us. For it is written, cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree, that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through what? through faith, not through faith plus works, not through faith plus circumcision, not faith plus the law of Moses, but it's grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. That's Peter's point at this council at Jerusalem. It's a point that needs to be underscored and reiterated throughout the history of the church, because it is simply testing God when we tell sinners that faith in Christ isn't enough. You need faith. plus our church. You need faith plus our rules. You need faith plus our particular way to go about things. Brethren, I've said this a million times as well, maybe not a million, that's hyperbolic, but I have said that we need to be careful of allowing our church culture to become on par with acceptance with God. Let me just qualify that. Every church has a culture. Every church has things that are unique to them. People might come in and say, boy, what an odd group of people this is. Okay, I own that, I accept that, I can hardly embrace that. But we do certain things as a church culture that we need to guard against communicating to someone coming in among us that they also have to imbibe that in order to be saved. Does that make sense? Give me a nod if it does, because this happens. We may not meet people at the door say, you should listen to the pastor, you should believe the gospel, and you should be circumcised. We don't do that. Circumcision isn't our deal. But we do have a culture. Churches everywhere have cultures, and we need to distinguish what is part of culture, which isn't necessarily wicked, it's not necessarily sinful, but it's wicked and sinful when we communicate that culture as a part on which God accepts us. That is faulty. That is testing God. That is compromising the law-free gospel. It is free access to the Father by the Son or through the Son in the power of the Holy Spirit. It is by grace through faith. period, and full stop. The moment that you and I try to make some cultural thing we do as a church necessary for salvation, we have transgressed God's word. Now this happens again, if not circumcision, decisions on how to school people, decisions on how to get medical treatment, decisions on how, oh, I don't know, a million other things. Brethren, there are matters of liberty in the Christian life, and we need to respect that blessed doctrine. We are not to Judaize in this current generation by giving additions to sinners on how they need to be accepted by God. It is grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, or we have crossed a line and are now testing God. Alexander describes this yoke. Notice what Peter says. Now, therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? Alexander says the yoke meant is the whole law as distinguished from the gospel and of which the ceremonial system was a mere form of expression. The covenant of works as distinguished from the covenant of grace in the economy of man's salvation. The hope of deliverance by merit or obedience as distinguished from deliverance by grace or favor. It is always a yoke placed upon people when we attach conditions to the gospel. That is... Absolutely forbidden by God. And brethren, I hope and pray that we don't fall prey to that. Now notice how Peter concludes, verse 11. But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, we shall be saved in the same manner as they. Now Peter had his issues. Galatians 2, Peter stopped having table fellowship with Gentiles. Barnabas got carried away. Paul withstood Peter to his face. But Peter got it. Peter understands it. Peter now knows. Praise God for Paul who didn't shrink back, or fear the face of man. It was said of John Knox, he neither feared nor flattered the face of any man. Well, Paul was the same sort of guy. He didn't fear, nor did he flatter. Oh, Peter, you know, because it's you, I'm gonna let you do. No, I wish stood him to his face. And what does Paul write in Galatians 2.16? It's something that Peter is affirming in his speech here. Paul says, knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law. For by the works of the law, no flesh shall be justified. Peter agrees. Peter is propounding that. Peter has stood up in this council and has made that testimony. There's one way of salvation. It applies to Jews. It applies to Gentiles. It is Jesus Christ, the great Savior, the Redeemer, the Champion, the victor, the very one prophesied in Old Testament scripture that did come from the Father, that lived in obedience to the law, that died as a sacrifice at the cross and was raised the third day so that you and I might have everlasting life. Brethren, Judaizing is wicked. Terrible, bad, horrible stuff. That's why we go after Romanism. It's not because of the weirdities and the oddities that they have, which there are a plethora, but it's at this very point, this collapsing, this conflation of justification and sanctification. This idea of including our faithfulness into God's reception of us is pernicious. Because the very best we do, even as redeemed sinners, falls incredibly short. For all of sin and fall short of the glory of God is a truism relative to sinners out there. But I think we'd all say the same thing for us redeemed sinners in here. We would say with the prophet Isaiah, our righteousnesses are like filthy rags. We affirm the Puritans who said that our repentance needs repenting of. We don't do what we ought to do in a manner that is perfect, that is exact, that is entire, that is perpetual. I mean, we get a bee in our bonnet, we're gonna go out and obey God, and that lasts about, what, 12 seconds? And then something happens and we lose it? Brethren, if our righteousness depends at a minuscule level upon us, we are dead and in hell forever and ever. Praise God for this law-free gospel. Now, when I say law-free gospel, I am not denigrating the law. I am talking about the gospel of Jesus Christ and the way of salvation. With reference to those who are blood-bought, those who have believed, those who have the Spirit, We ought to say, oh how I love your law, it is my meditation day and night. We take it, we use it normatively. We seek by grace to comply because it's a revelation of who God is and we want to please our father because he saved us. But that's a far cry different note than saying you have to do this in order to be saved. Now notice, we have the testimony of Paul and Barnabas in verse 12. It's brief, so we'll be brief. Then all the multitude kept silent. You may think I'm odd for camping on these little comments by Luke about the assembly, but I think this is great. They kept silent. It wasn't a room full of know-it-alls. It wasn't a Facebook theology page where everybody thinks they know everything and they have to blurt out everything. There's a place for sanctified silence. Those of you reading McChain, well, you'll read it tomorrow. I used the leap year to get one day ahead. So I read Proverbs 17 this morning. And what's an indicator that a man is wise? If he just shuts his mouth. He may not be wise, brethren, but he sure looks wise if he just shuts his mouth. There is wisdom in closing that thing once in a while. Well, there's wisdom in closing that thing a lot. Remember by design, we're supposed to listen twice as much as we talk. You've got two ears and one tongue. Do not disrespect the Lord God most high and his ingeniousness when it comes to creation. He designed us to listen more than we talk. And that's what the council is doing. They're not rushing to conclusions. They're not saying, oh, no, they're deliberating. They're thinking through it. They're processing data. Brethren, this is what churches do. They're something of a deliberative body. They think through information. a rash to giving, you know, their thoughts or whatever. The assembly kept silent, according to verse 12, and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles. The two men, I would suggest, agreed with Peter. Right? They didn't stand up and say, Peter's completely wrong. No, what they say affirms and confirms what Peter has said, because they just went on this first missionary journey. And what did God do? When they went from city to city and place to place, God worked wonders. He worked miracles. Remember in Lystra, there was that man sitting and he was crippled and Paul told him to rise up and he did. It caused the city of Lystra to go into an uproar and they wanted to worship Paul and Barnabas as a result of this. So what Paul and Barnabas do here is simply rehearse that God's signs, God's wonders, God's powers are multiplied not only among Jews, but among Gentiles as well. And that's the emphasis of Paul and Barnabas in verse 12. Daniel Bach says that God would work miracles in the midst of the Gentiles is another divine indicator for Gentile inclusion. Again, God didn't say, okay, once you guys believe, get circumcised, come back and I'll show you how I can heal this cripple man through the agency of the apostle Paul. That's not what happened. The signs and the wonders come irrespective of their circumcision before this holy God. So Paul and Barnabas affirm and confirm what Peter says, and that will bring us, God willing, next Sunday to consider James. James summarizes, James appeals to Peter, James appeals to the prophet Amos to show that what Amos had said is coming to pass in their midst. Gentile inclusion in the covenant promises of God is what Amos 9 was all about, and that's what James does. James then highlights the sovereignty of God in verse 19, and then James purposes to deal with doctrine and practice in the context of Jews and Gentiles. It is a wonderful display of a council at work, hearing information, hearing data, deliberating on it, and then Pastor James stands up in the midst and gives specific direction on how they ought to proceed to try and deal with this problem that was facing the churches. Now again, this problem still affects the churches, so we see that the Jerusalem Council didn't fix everything. Just like Elijah at Mount Carmel, didn't fix everything going forward with reference to Baal worship. We need constant and frequent reminders. We need constant and frequent emphases on justification by faith. Remember, Luther famously said, I preach justification by faith every week in my church because my people forget it every week. We need this reminder that it's by grace through faith in Christ Jesus, and that's Peter's point. So in conclusion, first the role of the church in matters of theology. I just don't think it's the church's job, business, or prerogative to be entertainers. I don't think that. I don't think it's the church's job, prerogative, or calling to be a business, to be structured similarly to a Fortune 500 company. I believe the church, according to Paul's definition in 1 Timothy 3, is the pillar and ground of the truth. In other words, the Bible tells us that truth matters, and true churches take that seriously. They don't play games with soteriology. They don't mess up when it comes to sovereignty. They don't mess up when it comes to, you know, is somebody a Calvinist or an Arminian. I think I shared with you before, I remember years and years ago, we had a young fellow from Simon. He went to Trinity Western. He would bring friends to our church. He was kind of an interesting guy that way. He'd invite people to go to church, and they'd agree. And then he'd say, oh, and by the way, can you drive? Because I don't have a car. And every week he got here, and some weeks he brought lots and lots of people. But I remember one time there were two guys, and they were biblical studies majors. I wouldn't know them if I bumped into them. I could bump my head into them. I wouldn't remember what they looked like. But I do remember them saying something to the effect, well, I'm not sure about Calvinism or Arminianism. Now, I'm going to say this. You need that worked out in Sunday school. If you're considering the pastoral ministry, you're considering shepherding souls, you're considering a ministry of preaching and teaching the Word of God, and you're a biblical studies major in a graduate level degree program and you haven't figured out that, Can I just say, you need to go back to Sunday school. You need to learn your ABCs. You need to learn your Bible basics before you ever, ever stand before sinners and teach them the word of the living and true God. Doesn't James tell us, let not many of us become teachers, or not let many of you become teachers. Why? We shall incur a stricter judgment. You know, the entertainment craze, the business craze, the community craze, whatever the craze may be, if the church is not operating as the pillar and ground of the truth, she has lost her way. This is the point of the church in the world. And one of the most intriguing things is to see people say, well, the church needs to be relevant. It's been my observation that when the church apes the culture in order to be relevant, she makes herself perniciously irrelevant. You know what this culture needs? They need churches that are pillars and grounds of the truth, churches that are preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ our Lord. Churches that are not going to compromise when it comes to the way of salvation or add to it or supplement it or derogate from the finished work of our Lord Jesus Christ. We are relevant by doing what God calls us to do. That's the bottom line, brethren, and that's what we see in passages like these that church, that theology matters for the church. Secondly, the mercy of God in the salvation of sinners. I don't want to just treat this as some sort of clinical, you know, exhibit A on the part of Peter. God saved Cornelius. God saved Cornelius' household. God is in the business of saving Gentiles. God is saving from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation. God has purposed, in eternity past, to save a great multitude that no man can number. God undertook by sending His Son, God the Son, into this world to accomplish the work of redemption. And God right now sends the Spirit to bless preaching, to open dead sinners' ears and hearts, and cause them to come unto Jesus. We see the mercy of God in the salvation of sinners, and we ought to rejoice that mercy and that grace is free. He doesn't say, believe and, believe and, believe and. Brethren, we function that way, don't we? When somebody wrongs us or somebody does disservice to us, we tell our kids, okay, I accept your apology. Plus, you need to go do this act of penance. We don't just freely accept them the way that God does. The gospel is free and it is most blessed. Thirdly, we ought to appreciate from passages like these the inability of man in the salvation of himself. Again, the law is good, therefore the law is holy and the commandment holy and just and good. It's not the law's fault, it's not the law's problem, it's our It's our problem. It's our sin in Adam. It's our rebellion. It's our waywardness It is our transgression of God's holy law. I quoted Luther last week from Galatians chapter 2 He says no law no matter how divine or holy has the right to tell me that I obtain justification in life through it I will grant that it can teach me that I should love God and my neighbor and live in chastity patience, etc But it is in no position to show me how to be delivered from sin the devil death and hell For this I must consult the gospel and listen to the gospel, which does not teach me what I should do, for that is the proper function of the law. But what someone else has done for me, namely, that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, has suffered and died to deliver me from sin and death. Praise God Almighty for that reality. Luther, contrary to a lot of popular opinion, was not an antinomian. Luther, however, saw a distinction between law and gospel, and we ought to see that distinction as well. There's a harmony, there's compliance, there's sweetness between the two. But in terms of a man's acceptance with God, we cannot preach law. Law will always destroy, law will always conquer, law will always win sinners. It is the Christ of the Gospel, it is the glory of Jesus, it is every spiritual blessing, vis-Ã -vis justification, sanctification, glorification, Our champion brings that. Our Savior saves. Our Redeemer redeems, and He does so without our assistance, or without our contribution, or without our obedience to the law. It is His obedience, it is His death, it is His resurrection that is the basis for our acceptance with God. That, brothers and sisters, is what Peter said. And the church receives it, James enacts on it, and they give counsel to churches to facilitate Gentile inclusion in an ecclesiastical context, all the while shutting the door on this pernicious idea that it's faith plus Moses in order to be saved. Well, let us pray. Father, we thank you for your word. We thank you for the clarity of Peter's presentation here, and we see it in Acts 10. We've seen it in our studies in this book of Acts and the way that Gentiles come freely by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. God, we give praise to you for that. We give praise to you that you have called us out of darkness into marvelous light. You have given us faith to believe on the Redeemer. You have given us repentance unto life. We pray that a multitude more would come to you by Christ and for your glory and honor. And we ask this in Jesus' holy name. Amen.
