← Back to sermon library
Romans chapter 4, Romans chapter
4. I'll read the chapter and then
our focus will be on verse 25, so beginning in chapter 4 at
verse 1. What then shall we say that Abraham
our father has found according to the flesh? For if Abraham
was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but
not before God. For what does the scripture say?
Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace, but
as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on him,
who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,
just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to
whom God imputes righteousness apart from works. Blessed are
those whose lawless deeds are forgiven and whose sins are covered.
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord shall not impute sin. Does
this blessedness then come upon the circumcised only or upon
the uncircumcised also? For we say that faith was accounted
to Abraham for righteousness. How then was it accounted? While
he was circumcised or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while
uncircumcised. And he received the sign of circumcision,
a seal of the righteousness of the faith, which he had while
still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all those
who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness
might be imputed to them also, and the father of circumcision
to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also
walk in the steps of the faith, which our father Abraham had
while still uncircumcised. For the promise that he would
be the heir of the world was not to Abraham or to his seed
through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. For
if those who are of the law are heirs, faith is made void, and
the promise made of no effect, because the law brings about
wrath. For where there is no law, there is no transgression.
Therefore, it is of faith that it might be according to grace,
so that the promise might be sure to all to see, not only
to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of
the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all. As it is
written, I have made you a father of many nations. In the presence
of him whom he believed, God, who gives life to the dead and
calls those things which do not exist as though they did. who,
contrary to hope, in hope believed, so that he became the father
of many nations. According to what was spoken,
so shall your descendants be. And not being weak in faith,
he did not consider his own body, already dead, since he was about
a hundred years old, and the deadness of Sarah's womb. He
did not waver at the promise of God through unbelief, but
was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God, and being fully
convinced that what he had promised he was also able to perform,
and therefore it was accounted to him for righteousness. Now,
it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to
him, but also for us. It shall be imputed to us who
believe in him, who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead,
who was delivered up because of our offenses and was raised
because of our justification. Amen. Well, let us pray. Father,
thank you for the written word of the living and true God. Thank
you for this book of Romans and the great detailed exposition
of the gospel that we find here. And God, guide us and navigate
us now by the Holy Spirit as we look at this one particular
passage in the context, and may it again edify, strengthen, and
encourage each of our hearts. Forgive us for all of our sins
and our transgressions, and bless this local church, we pray, through
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. Well, this is a very dense
section of Paul's argument in the book of Romans. Essentially,
it starts at chapter 3, verse 21, and goes to the end of chapter
4. And the primary focus is on justification
by faith alone. Before Paul gets to the example
of Abraham, he gives, first of all, a statement concerning justification
and the righteousness of God. So before Paul starts to treat
of the doctrine positively in terms of its effect, not only
for Abraham but for us as well, he wants to make sure we understand
that God has authorized this, God has instituted this, God
is the driving force behind it. That's how chapter 3 verses 21
to 26 function. It demonstrates that in the gospel,
God is both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
So God doesn't compromise His holiness, God doesn't get rid
of His law, God doesn't look away with reference to justice,
but rather at the cross, God upholds His justice, God demonstrates
His righteousness, and at the same time demonstrates that mercy
and grace and kindness to the elect of God who find their justification
at the hands of this righteous father. And then he makes a few
statements concerning justification by faith specifically in chapter
3, verses 27 to 31. And then he explains the doctrine
relative to Abraham. He cites Abraham, and then David,
and then returns to Abraham. And essentially what Paul is
saying is that the doctrine of justification by faith alone
is no new thing. Everybody that has ever been
saved, it was according to God's grace and it was through faith
in Jesus Christ. Remember Abraham believed God
and it was accounted unto him for righteousness. So Abraham
becomes this sort of paradigm or figure in redemptive history. And so Paul takes that now and
shows how it relates not only to Abraham, but to us. And that
brings us to verses 23 to 25. He says, now it was not written
for his sake alone that it was imputed to him. And the imputed
to him is the idea of righteousness. In other words, we need a righteousness
to be able to stand before a holy God. We don't have a righteousness
because we're unholy men. We have rebelled, we have transgressed,
we have lacked conformity. To that law, as the prophet Isaiah
says, all we like sheep have gone astray. So God imputes or
gives or confers or hands over to us this righteousness. It's received by faith alone.
It is ultimately the righteousness of Jesus Christ, which He accomplished
in His act of obedience. So verse 23, it was not written
for His sake alone that it was imputed to Him, but also for
us. It shall be imputed to us who believe in him, who raised
up Jesus our Lord from the dead, who was delivered up because
of our offenses and was raised because of our justification.
So when he refers to God raising, or rather God imputing to us
who believe in him, verse 24, who raised up Jesus our Lord
from the dead, verse 25, at least in the first statement, explains
why it was that Jesus was dead. In other words, this God, this
father raised up his son from the dead. Verse 25a describes
or defines or tells us why Jesus died in the first place. Charles
Hodge said this verse is a comprehensive statement of the gospel. Verse
25, the denial of the propitiatory death of Christ or of his resurrection
from the dead is a denial of the gospel. Now, Hodge wasn't
overstating the case there. If you deny those things, you
deny the Christian gospel. Matthew Poole commented on verse
25. He says, this one verse is an abridgment of the whole gospel. If somebody ever asked you, what
is the gospel? You would certainly be well served
by citing Romans chapter 4, verse 25. I want to look at two things
as we consider this particular passage. In the first place,
the redemptive purpose of the death of Christ, and then secondly,
the redemptive purpose of the resurrection of Christ. And in
the first place, notice the redemptive purpose of the death of Christ. Notice in verse 25, who was delivered
up because of our offenses. We need to understand in the
first place that the gospel, the cross work of our Lord Jesus,
was not first and foremost an example. It is certainly exemplary. It does function as an example,
say, in 1 Peter chapter 2, where the Apostle Peter points us to
Christ. as one who modeled a steady composure
under suffering the way that the people of God are supposed
to. But we don't see the pinnacle of Christ's cross work in the
exemplary function. The Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians
chapter 1 Verses 23 and 24 says, we preach Christ crucified to
the Jews, a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness. But
to those but to those who are being saved, both Jews and Greeks,
Christ, the power of God and the wisdom of God. So, yes, there's
an example there, but that's not the first priority. The first
priority of the death of Christ is redemption. It is salvation. It is reconciliation. It is the
purchase of those who are dead in their trespasses and sins
by the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Notice what Paul says
specifically. It was for sin, who was delivered
up because of our offenses. Now the offenses are obvious.
It is a transgression of God's holy law. If you go back to the
book of Romans, chapter 1, beginning in verse 18, and you move all
the way to chapter 3 at verse 20, it fleshes out the sorts
of offenses, the sorts of transgressions, the sorts of sins that Jesus
was delivered up because of. And so it's not for some nebulous
potential out there, but rather it is for the specific sins of
the elect of God that were laid upon the Savior and the Father
punished Him in our place. That is the glory of the atonement.
It is substitutionary. When Christ went to that cross,
He didn't go because of His own sins. He didn't go because of
His own crimes. He went rather for our sins.
But again, it's not nebulous, it's not generic, it's not sort
of undefined. Hebrews 2.17 tells us, And then
it goes on to say, Again, there's an idea that Christ
made this atonement and that it's available for anyone that
wants to avail themselves of it. That is simply not the case. When Christ went to that cross,
it was for the sins of the people, and in this, the people greatly
rejoice. It wasn't a hypothetical atonement,
but rather it was particular, it was limited, it was definite.
Christ went to the cross for the sins of His people. And as
we consider this particular statement, who was delivered up because
of our offenses, We ought to ponder that the cross teaches
us certain truths. It does demonstrate the righteousness
of God, that he's both just and the justifier of the one who
has faith in Jesus. It teaches us the willingness
of the Son of God to go to such great lengths to purchase us
from the slave market of sin. But it also underscores just
how bad sin is. Sin is wretched, sin is an offense
to God Almighty, sin is horrific, and it took the very blood of
the Son of God Himself to atone for it. In the Trinity Hymnal,
the older one, I don't know that this song is in the new one,
It says, there's a particular hymn by Thomas Kelly, and it
says, ye who think of sin but lightly, nor suppose the evil
great, here may view its nature rightly, here its guilt may estimate. Mark the sacrifice appointed,
see who bears the awful load, tis the word, the Lord's anointed,
son of man and son of God. Ye who think of sin but lightly,
nor suppose the evil great, here may view its nature rightly,
here its guilt may estimate. So the cross proclaims the odiousness
and the wretchedness and the reprehensibility of sin itself. So Jesus was delivered up because
of our offenses. And that is the particular aspect
that we need to concern ourselves with. God's justice demands that
we be delivered up because of our sins. But the glory of the
gospel is that Christ took our place. Christ went in the stead
of his people. Christ wrought out atonement
on behalf of those whom the father had given him. There's an analogy
in the Old Testament, Leviticus chapter 16. Leviticus 16 is sort
of the central chapter in the book of Leviticus, not only structurally,
but literarily and theologically as well. It deals with the day
of atonement. And you see the high priest given
that particular responsibility to kill the one goat and then
to take the blood and go into the Holy of Holies and there
make atonement, there pour out that blood on the mercy seat.
And then there's a second goat and they call that the scapegoat.
And so the high priest takes his hand and he lays them on
that goat, and he confesses the sin of Israel. Again, not generic,
not undefined, not nebulous. Most likely, he goes according
to the Decalogue, confessing the transgression of Israel committed
against God Most High. Once that hand or that gesture
is done and the sins are confessed, then that lamb, or rather that
goat, is driven out into the wilderness. It's a wonderful
picture of the expiation or the removal of our guilt and sin.
You see, what happens in the Old Testament, Christ accomplishes. That is typological and Jesus
fulfills it. He is the anti-type and in him,
we have forgiveness. In him, we have the removal of
guilt. In him, we have the removal of all the sanctions that were
upon us for our having transgressed that holy law of God. It's a
beautiful and a blessed transaction that occurs. And again, he was
delivered up because of our offenses. And we need to appreciate that
and praise God Almighty. Now, when it says He was delivered
up because of our offenses, there is divine initiative there. The
Son is certainly willing, and He shows us that and demonstrates
that throughout the gospel records. But most likely what's in view
here is the Father. In Isaiah the prophet, in Isaiah
53 11, it says that Yahweh was pleased to bruise Him. In Acts 2, the apostle Peter
says that the crucifixion of Christ was according to the predetermined
plan of God Almighty. In Acts chapter 4, when the apostles
are praying, they acknowledge the same thing. that it was God
who ordained the death of the Lord Jesus Christ. In this book
of Romans, you see that emphasis right here in chapter 3. Notice
in verse 25, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood. That's the divine initiative
in this transaction. It's not that we sought God,
it's that God sought us. From the very moment Adam and
Eve transgress, they run and they hide. God comes after them. God kills animals and covers
them. God seeks out Abraham. God is
the one who comes to Isaac and Jacob. God is the initiator. God is the one who saves. And
it's the father who delivered up the son because of the offenses
committed by the elect. And in chapter 3, 25, he says
that he was set forth as a propitiation, a rich and beautiful and lovely
word describing the atoning work of our Lord Jesus. It presupposes
wrath. God's wrath is targeted against
all sinners. Propitiation is Christ's taking
the wrath of God in himself for us. He doesn't deflect the wrath,
he doesn't send the wrath away, but rather he drinks the cup
of God's wrath to its bitter dregs. That's how propitiation
is wrought out. And then he goes on to say, through
faith, to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance God
passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate
at the present time his righteousness, that he might be just and the
justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. Turn over to
Romans chapter 8. Again, just to see this emphasis
in terms of the divine initiative in the cross. Romans chapter
8, verse 31. What then shall we say to these
things? If God is for us, who can be
against us? He who did not spare his own
Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with
him also freely give us all things? It's an argument from the greater
to the lesser. If the father didn't shrink back
from delivering up his son on our behalf, and delivering up
there means to the cross, to the shame, to the suffering,
to the punishment, to the death ultimately, if he does that,
how is he gonna leave us on Thursday? How is he not gonna be there
for us in our time of need? If he does the greatest in terms
of the crucifixion of his beloved son, then how will he not be
there for us in crunch time that we undergo. It's a beautiful
thing and a glorious doctrine and a glorious truth, but it
does underscore again, divine initiative. Now we know in terms
of the death of Jesus, there was an instrumentality of the
Jewish leaders. Certainly Pontius Pilate signed off. He gave the
execution order. So that instrumentality is there
to be sure. Peter doesn't minimize their
lawlessness or their vileness or their wretchedness in Acts
chapter two, but ultimately it comes from the hand of God. Octavius
Winslow said, who delivered up Jesus to die? Not Judas for money,
not Pilate for fear, not the Jews for envy, but the Father
for love. It's a beautiful thing when he
says it that way. It is the Father's love. I think
at times we have this idea that Jesus came to sort of secure
God's love for us. Jesus came as a result of God's
love for us. Jesus doesn't procure the Father's
love. Rather, Jesus is the manifestation
of the Father's love. John 3, 16, God so loved the
world that he gave his only begotten Son. There's no New Testament
God appeasing the wrath and fury of the Old Testament God. No,
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit work in perfect unity and harmony. to save us from our sins. So
the reason for his death, it wasn't first and foremost exemplary,
it was first and foremost atonement, it was redemptive. And then in
terms of the specifics, he was delivered up because of our offenses.
Now let's look secondly at the redemptive purpose of the resurrection
of Christ. The fact is stated, and was raised
because of our justification. Again, we saw that fact stated
this morning in Matthew chapter 28 at verses 1 to 10. You see
that fact stated in John, in Mark, in Luke. You see that fact
stated in a whole host of places. In fact, turn to 1 Corinthians
chapter 15 for one other sort of specimen passage concerning
the resurrection of our Savior. The entirety of the chapter is
devoted to an argument concerning resurrection, but he starts off
with the foundation, the resurrection of Christ from the dead. Verse
1 in 1 Corinthians 15. that Christ died for our sins
according to the Scriptures. Now, the Scriptures are the Old
Testament. You need to understand that.
When Paul's writing 1 Corinthians and he refers to Scripture, he
is not referring to New Testament documents. The Old Testament
prophesied the death of the Savior. We see it in the prophet Isaiah,
specifically in Isaiah 53. We see the cutting off of Messiah
in Daniel chapter 9. We see it typologically in Abraham
going up to Mount Moriah with Isaac. We see it throughout the
Old Testament. And then notice he goes on to
say, and he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according
to the scriptures. Again, not New Testament scriptures,
though the New Testament certainly highlights or underscores this
blessed fact, but as we read this morning, Psalm 16. Other
passages in the Old Testament highlight the resurrection of
Messiah, the fact that he will indeed complete God's work, supposes
or assumes that he will in fact be alive. So this is foundational
for the apostle Paul. He goes on to say he was buried,
that he rose again the third day, according to the scriptures,
and that he was seen by Cephas, then by the 12. After that, he
was seen by over 500 brethren at once, of whom the greater
part remained to the present, but some have fallen asleep.
After that, he was seen by James, then by all the apostles. Then
last of all, he was seen by me also, as by one born out of due
time." So going back to Romans chapter 4, just as he was delivered
up because of our offenses, he was raised for our justification. And again, the emphasis is on
the father raising him from the dead. It's not that Christ does
not participate in that particular action, but what is in view here
is the Father raising the Son from the dead. Turretin explains
it this way. Although the resurrection of
Christ is often ascribed to the Father, he gives several passages,
it does not follow that it cannot be ascribed to the Son, because
whatever the Father does, the Son in like manner does. And
as the resurrection is an outward work, it ought to be undivided
to the whole Trinity. So it is what the Trinity does,
and in this particular instance, we see appropriated to the Father
the reality that He raised His Son from the dead. So the Son
is delivered up because of our offenses, and that selfsame Son
is raised up for our justification. And that is the result of the
resurrection. Now, when we look at that particular
statement, justification, we ought to appreciate, especially
in this context, that it's a forensic term. Paul is not talking about
moral transformation here. Paul is not saying this occurred
so that you and I might be great girls and guys. Sanctification
certainly follows, and Paul will definitely deal with that, but
in this context, in Romans chapter 3 and 4, he is highlighting and
accenting the judicial character of justification by faith, the
forensic nature of it. This righteousness is imputed
to us. It is received by faith alone. That blessed righteousness
is also accompanied by forgiveness of sins. So the justification
that Paul is speaking about is defined, I think, beautifully
by Westminster, Shorter Catechism, when it says, justification is
an act of God's free grace, wherein He pardons all our sins and accepts
us as righteous in His sight, only for the righteousness of
Christ imputed to us and received by faith alone. There's people
that are Christians, and I don't doubt their Christianity, but
a lot of Christians want really practical sorts of things. And
they like tips, they like hints, they like principles, they like
the sorts of things that we can put on a list and just sort of
do. My encouragement, brethren, is to get that definition down. There's nothing more practical,
nothing more blessed, nothing more great for the Christian
to apprehend than the reality that God, in justification, forgives
us of all our sins and receives us as righteous in His sight
only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us and received
by faith alone. Whenever I deal with new believers
and it comes time to talk about our confession of faith, I always
emphasize chapter 11. If you understand the Bible's
teaching on the doctrine of justification, which I think our confession
gets really, really good, that opens up a world of comfort.
You've heard the story of Martin Luther who was just plagued by
his own sin, plagued by his own rebellion, plagued by his own
wickedness as he was a monk. Remember R.C. Sproul saying,
what kind of sins could a monk get into? I mean, Martin Luther
would go into the confessional and he'd be in there for hours.
And, you know, Sproul asked the question, you know, what is he
in there confessing? I coveted brother so-and-so's bond. I mean,
you know, there's how much trouble do you get into in a monastery?
Well, you get into a lot of trouble if you know your own heart. Doesn't
matter where you are. Doesn't matter who you're with.
Doesn't matter what you're about or doing. If you contemplate
for a moment on God's law in your own heart, you will see
the bankruptcy. You will see the depravity. So
anyway, Luther had this great crushing burden of sin over him,
and it was Romans 1, 16 and 17 that opened paradise for him.
For I'm not ashamed of the gospel, the apostle Paul writes, for
it is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who believes, to
the Jew first and also to the Greek. Why? For in it, the righteousness
of God is revealed from faith to faith. And Luther understood
Paul's point. When Paul says that in Romans
1, 16 and 17, we see a parallel in Philippians chapter 3, 9.
It's not God's perfection of righteousness, though God possesses
that, but that righteousness that is spoken of there in Romans
1, 16 and 17 is the righteousness that God demands and that God
supplies. For in it, the righteousness
of God is revealed from faith to faith. That, as it is written,
the just shall live by faith. So there is a perfection of God,
righteousness, justice, holiness. But there is this gift of God,
righteousness, that comes in the gospel as a result of the
finished work of our Lord Jesus Christ. For Luther, that is when
paradise opened, when he understood The gospel. When he understood
that it's not good advice, but rather it's good news. When he
understood that guilty, vile, helpless, we, spotless Lamb of
God was He, full atonement can it be? Hallelujah, what a Savior. When Luther understood that,
he then rejoiced. Now, when it comes to these two
things, look at what the text says. He was delivered up because
of our offenses, death, and he was raised because of our justification,
resurrection. The two events are inseparable. The resurrection is the necessary
follow-up to the death of our Savior. Listen to Warfield. He
says that he died manifests his love and his willingness to save. That he rose again manifests
his power and his ability to save. Now, please follow because
this is crucial, because I'm sure there's somebody saying,
he was raised because of our justification. The Apostle Paul
typically connects justification to death. Here he connects it
to resurrection, but he has just spoken of death. Again, two inseparable
events. Listen to Warfield. That he died
manifests his love and his willingness to save. That he rose again manifests
his power and his ability to save. We are not saved by a dead
Christ who undertook but could not perform, and who lies there
still under the Syrian sky, another martyr of impotent love. If we
are to be saved at all, it must be by one who did not merely
pass to death on our behalf, but who passed through death,
that's crucial. In one word, the resurrection
of Christ is fundamental to the Christian hope and to the Christian
confidence. All our assurance of salvation
is suspended on this fact. So there is this close and inextricable
connection between the death of Christ and the resurrection
of Christ. This morning I mentioned Romanism.
Again, not trying to unnecessarily pick on them, but when you have
Christ still on the cross, that's not the entire message. Christ
was on the cross, he entered the tomb, but on the third day
he was raised from the dead by his Father. Charles Hodge says
the resurrection of Christ as an historical fact established
by the most satisfactory evidence authenticates the whole gospel. In other words, if Christ said
he was who he said, and Christ died but did not rise again,
then there is no authentication, there is no confirmation. We
might muse and say, what a noble character, what a wonderful human,
what a kind man, what a compassionate fellow, but we wouldn't be able
to testify that he is in fact the savior for sinners. It wasn't
just death, but it's resurrection as well. He goes on to say, as
surely as Christ has risen, so surely shall believers be saved. Verse 25. Now, if we ask the
question, what is the theological connection between resurrection
and justification? I want to answer that. First,
the resurrection testifies that Christ is in fact the Son of
God with power. Look back at Romans chapter 1.
Romans chapter 1, beginning in verse 1, Paul, a bondservant
of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle separated to the gospel
of God, which he promised before through his prophets in the Holy
Scriptures, concerning his son Jesus Christ our Lord, who was
born of the seed of David according to the flesh, and now notice,
and declared to be the son of God with power, according to
the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead. Not
that he became the son of God, but rather it testified that
he was in fact the Son of God. The resurrection underscores
the truth that Christ is the Davidic Messiah, the mediator
of the New Covenant, the second person of the Trinity, who for
us men and for our salvation came down from heaven. Secondly,
the resurrection testifies that Christ's sacrifice was accepted. The resurrection testifies that
Christ's sacrifice was accepted. In other words, the father was
pleased and raised him from the dead. John Gill says Christ's
resurrection did not procure the justification of his people
that was done by his obedience and death. but was for the testification
of it." In other words, it testified concerning it. "...that it might
fully appear that sin was atoned for, and an everlasting righteousness
was brought in, and for the application of it, or that Christ might live
and see His righteousness imputed, and apply to all those for whom
He had wrought it out." In other words, when Christ is raised
from the dead, it not only testifies that He is the Son of God with
power, but it also shows us divine approbation for the sacrifice
rendered up by the Son of God. The language of Hermann Bavink,
the resurrection is, quote, a divine endorsement of His mediatorial
work, a declaration of the power and value of His death, the amen
of the Father upon the it is finished of the Son. I don't
think that could possibly be said better outside of the written
scriptural record. Thirdly, the resurrection testifies
that satisfaction was rendered. Now, you might think this all
sounds the same. It's not. The sacrifice was accepted
by the Father, but the resurrection testifies that satisfaction was
rendered. Older writers oftentimes refer
to atonement as satisfaction. It's the underlying theme with
reference to atonement. Christ satisfies divine justice
by his sufferings and death at the cross. So again, God is angry
with the wicked every day, Psalm 711. God hates the workers of
iniquity, Psalm 5.5. God will bring men into judgment
and punishment as a result of their sins. Propitiation answers
the question, what happens to that wrath? Well, Christ takes
it. Satisfaction deals with it from a bit of a different angle.
The Father, the judge of all the earth, is satisfied. The
requirements of his just law have been met by the Savior.
The punishment that is due for sinners is received by the Savior. And so satisfaction is rendered
at the cross. In other words, again, we have
a definite atonement. We have a real atonement. We
have atonement that's not just sort of set out there for anybody
that wants to activate it, but rather the atonement is efficacious
for those God purposes to save. Fourthly, the resurrection testifies
that redemption was accomplished. What does Jesus say on the cross?
The sixth saying of the Savior on the cross, he says, it is
finished. That's a blessed statement that
Christ utilizes from the cross. It's not, I am finished. It's
not a weak sort of an insipid emptying of himself. It is a
triumph cry. It is victory. It is finished. The work that the Father has
given me is accomplished. That sixth saying of the Savior
on the cross indicates that reconciliation, redemption is affected by the
Son of God. And it's in what's called the
perfect tense. I don't wanna sort of bore anybody
here, but the perfect tense in Greek means something that happened
in the past, but it has present and abiding effect on us now. And then, interestingly as well,
when archaeologists go out, archaeologists, if any of you kids really like
playing in the dirt or mud, consider archaeology. That'd be a good
pursuit for you. Someday you could get paid to
dig around in the dirt and mud. I mean, wouldn't that be great?
You find things. Well, as persons have taken that task on, they
have found the Greek word that Jesus uses here on bills, receipts,
commercial, transcript or paperwork from commerce. And this word,
it's technically, or the Greek word is tetelestai. It's not
stamped, because they didn't have stamps back then, but it's
in there. It means it's paid in full. It
means that the transaction is completed, and that is what Christ
says on the cross. Spurgeon makes this comment concerning
the Savior with reference to this sixth saying from the cross,
it is finished. He says, I am persuaded that
it was so intended to be used for none of the... Oh, he's talking
about it's for the benefit of his church. I am persuaded that
it was so intended to be used for none of the words of our
Lord on the cross are addressed to his church but this one. I
cannot believe that when he was dying, he left his people, for
whom he died, without a word. Father, forgive them, for they
know not what they do is for sinners, not for saints. I thirst
is for himself. And so is that bitter cry, my
God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Woman, behold, thy son is
for Mary. Today shalt thou be with me in
paradise is for the penitent thief. Into thy hands, I commend
my spirit, is for the father. Jesus must have had something
to say in the hour of death for his church, and surely this is
his dying word for her. And it's a most excellent dying
word for her as well. It is finished. Christ did what
he came to do, and he successfully completed the task. So the resurrection
testifies that Christ is the Son of God with power. It testifies
that Christ's sacrifice was accepted. It testifies that satisfaction
was rendered. It testifies that redemption
was accomplished. And finally, it testifies that
the session was initiated. And by session, I mean right
now, the current session of our Lord. Go back to Acts chapter
2, and we'll see that connection. Acts chapter 2, the apostle Peter
speaking concerning Jesus, His person and work sets forth the
true humanity of Christ in verse 22, the predetermined death of
Christ in verse 23, the glorious resurrection of Christ in verses
24 to 32, and then the triumphant exaltation of Christ in verses
33 to 36. Now this triumphant exaltation
of Christ refers to the session, the current session of Christ.
In other words, what is Jesus doing now? Well, this is what
we see here. Verse 32, this Jesus God is raised
up, of which we are all witnesses. Therefore being exalted to the
right hand of God, and having received from the Father the
promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now
see and hear. Again, that's the emphasis in this passage. In
Acts chapter 2, the primary focus isn't on the Spirit and tongue
speaking. I'm not suggesting that we relegate
the Spirit to some marginal status, but that's not the emphasis.
The emphasis is that Christ, the ascended Lord, sits enthroned
at the right hand of the Father, and He is the one that has poured
out the Holy Spirit on this particular occasion. Verse 34, for David
did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself, the Lord
said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies
your footstool. Therefore, let all the house of Israel know
assuredly that God has made this Jesus whom you crucified, both
Lord and Christ. So the resurrection testifies
that the current session, or the session rather, was initiated. There's still stuff for the mediator
to do. He ever lives to make intercession
for us, but he will return in glory to judge the living and
the dead. So there are aspects of the mediatorial
work of Christ that still need to be accomplished, not relative
to our salvation. That is a done deal. not some
sort of Seventh-day Adventist doctrine where he continues to
make atonement in the Holy of Holies. That's nonsense. Christ
wrought out atonement in his life, his death, and his resurrection. But it does still remain for
Christ to come again and to judge and to consummate the age. Well,
in conclusion, in the first place, we ought to appreciate the necessity
of the death of Christ. The evil of sin is no small thing.
If you are not a believer here tonight, you need to ponder this.
If you are reflecting or listening, perhaps, online, and you're not
a believer, you may not think sin is that big of a deal. You
may think something like, well, you know, everybody does sin.
Yeah, everyone does sin, and it's horrible. It is abominable. It is wretched. God made us upright,
and behold, we sought out many devices. Your devices might not
be mine, my devices might not be yours, but that undercurrent,
that theme that is connecting all of us is rebellion against
the living and true God. If that necessitated the death
of Christ for its remedy, then we ought to appreciate just how
bad sin really is. As well, the remedy for sin involves
forgiveness and the imputation of Christ's righteousness. The
death of Christ secures that forgiveness. The life of Christ
obviously secures the imputation of the act of obedience, but
that death of Christ What does the Apostle say in Hebrews 9.22?
Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission. There
is no forgiveness without the shedding of blood. What does
John the Baptist say when he beholds Jesus Christ in John
1? He says, Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of
the world. The Son of Man did not come to
be served, but to serve and to give His life a ransom for many. In Him we have redemption through
His blood, both Ephesians 1 and Colossians 1. This emphasis on
the blood of Jesus Christ is not owing to a sick, twisted
fascination on the part of the people of God, but rather it
tells us or proclaims to us that in the death of the Savior, we
have the forgiveness of sin. Secondly, the glory of the resurrection
of Christ, the work of satisfaction having been accomplished, Christ
was no longer under the dominion of death. Romans 6, 9 and 10
tells us this. Hodge says, with the dead Savior,
a Savior over whom death had triumphed and held captive, our
justification had been forever impossible. In other words, if
Christ is not raised from the dead, then we are still in our
sins. That's what Paul says in 1 Corinthians
15. That's a horrible condition to
be in. So we need death, we need resurrection. As well, the work of satisfaction
having been accomplished, the Father raised the Son, to testify
concerning the completion of the work. As I mentioned this
morning, we looked at the historicity of the resurrection and the gospel
narratives and other New Testament passages. Paul deals with the
theology. Not that Matthew, Mark, Luke,
and John don't. Not that the other gospel or other New Testament
authors don't, but Paul really investigates the theological
sort of basis or foundation for these things, and they are most
encouraging and most stabilizing. And once again, may I encourage
you, encourage you the pathway to good practical Christianity
comes through a robust appreciation of good Christian doctrine. In other words, without the theory,
without the truth, without that substance, you will flounder
in your Christian experience. Don't just reach for the book
on how to be a good wife or the book on how to be a good husband,
but reach for the book that explains to you the glory of the cross,
the book that explains to you the glory of justification by
faith alone, a book that explains to you the connection between
justification and sanctification. In other words, brethren, feed
your souls with the great doctrine of the cross of our Lord Jesus
Christ. Thirdly, if you look just ahead
in chapter 5 at verse 1, we see the blessed result of His death
and resurrection. Look at what Paul says. Therefore,
having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through
our Lord Jesus Christ. Peace is something everybody
wants. Now there's the few sick individuals
out there that seem to thrive in chaos. They seem to thrive
when everything's a mess. They seem to thrive when everything
is just coming off the tracks. But most people like a degree
of peace. Most people are a little bit
upbraided right now because we can't go outside or we are being
frowned upon as we meet together in the church. There's this absence
of or lack of, but that's at the horizontal level. The apostle
is dealing with peace, with God, Therefore, having been justified
by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,
through whom also we have access by faith into this grace in which
we stand and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. Now look
at how Paul gets real practical here. And not only that, but
we also glory in tribulations, knowing that tribulation produces
perseverance and perseverance character and character hope.
Now hope does not disappoint because the love of God has been
poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to
us. That's a good bit of practical theology based on his exposition
of the cross and the empty tomb of our blessed Savior. It is
absolutely crucial that we appropriate these doctrines in our minds
and in our hearts. It is this which will promote
stability, which will promote encouragement, which will promote
comfort and security in the lives of God's people. When you get
justification, the way that Paul deals with it, the way that Jesus
teaches it, the way that the prophets and Moses dealt with
it, when you understand it the way the best of the Reformation
theologians articulated, that which is encapsulated in Westminster
Catechism 33, there is a world of comfort and hope afforded
to us by that glorious truth. And if you're not a believer
tonight, it's faith in Jesus. It's look and live. It is believe
on that one in whom there is forgiveness. All that the Father
gives me, Jesus says, will come to me, and the one who comes
to me, I will serve. certainly not cast out. It'll
never be the case that a sinner coming after Jesus will be rebuffed,
will be rejected, will be resisted. Christ came into this world,
sinners to save. And if you look at 1 Timothy
1.15, That's exactly what Paul says. This is a faithful saying. It's worthy of all acceptation
that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. But he
puts sinners in the front of the sentence. Greek is interesting. It's not the typical sort of
way we do things in English, where you have a subject and
then a predicate. You can put the predicate and then the subject.
Sometimes they do that for emphasis, and when Paul does that in 1
Timothy 1.15, he is saying Christ Jesus came into the world, sinners!
to save, the emphasis is upon the sinners there. So never conclude,
well, I'm too sinful, Christ can't save me. You're so sinful,
Christ alone can save you. Never try to argue yourself out
of running to the Savior, believing on Jesus Christ, looking and
living, because that is eternal life. Well, let us pray. Our
Father, we thank you for your word. We thank you for the clarity
of Romans 4.25. And as Poole says, it is a great
summary statement of the entirety of the Christian gospel. And
I pray it would speak multitudes of comfort to our own hearts,
that it would help steady us, that we would have that confidence,
not in ourselves, but in our beloved Savior, and that we would
rejoice in the goodness and in the kindness and in the mercy
of our great God and Savior. We pray that many, many, many
more people will believe this message, and many, many more
people will come out of darkness into marvelous light. As we look
at the book of Revelation, we see there's not just a handful,
it's not just a small group of people, but a great multitude
that no man can number, from every tribe, tongue, people,
and nation. This gives us great hope, this gives us great encouragement.
So God, we pray, send forth men to preach send forth all of us
to testify, to witness, to declare that Christ is a real Savior
for real sinners. And we pray these things in His
most blessed name. Amen.