← Back to sermon library
Psalm 22. The outline of the psalm is very
simple. The first half deals with the suffering of Christ,
and the second with the glory of Christ. So I'll read the entirety
of the psalm, and then we'll look at it in some detail. So
Psalm 22, beginning in verse 1. To the chief musician set
to the dear of the dawn, a psalm of David. My God, my God, why
have you forsaken me? Why are you so far from helping
me and from the words of my groaning? Oh my God, I cry in the daytime,
but you do not hear, and in the night season, and am not silent. But you are holy, enthroned in
the praises of Israel. Our fathers trusted in you. They
trusted and you delivered them. They cried to you and were delivered.
They trusted in you and were not ashamed. But I am a worm
and no man, a reproach of men and despised by the people. All
those who see me ridicule me. They shoot out the lip. They
shake the head saying, he trusted in the Lord. Let him rescue him.
Let him deliver him since he delights in him. but you are
he who took me out of the womb. You made me trust while on my
mother's breasts. I was cast upon you from birth.
From my mother's womb, you have been my God. Be not far from
me, for trouble is near, for there is none to help. Many bulls
have surrounded me. Strong bulls of Bashan have encircled
me. They gape at me with their mouths
like a raging and roaring lion. I am poured out like water and
all my bones are out of joint. My heart is like wax. It is melted
within me. My strength is dried up like
a pot shirt and my tongue clings to my jaws. You have brought
me to the dust of death. For dogs have surrounded me.
The congregation of the wicked has enclosed me. They pierced
my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones. They
look and stare at me. They divide my garments among
them. And for my clothing, they cast lots. But you, O Lord, do
not be far from me. O my strength, hasten to help
me. Deliver me from the sword, my
precious life from the power of the dog. Save me from the
lion's mouth and from the horns of the wild oxen. You have answered
me. I will declare your name to my
brethren. In the midst of the assembly,
I will praise you. You who fear the Lord, praise
him. All you descendants of Jacob, glorify him and fear him, all
you offspring of Israel. For he has not despised nor abhorred
the affliction of the afflicted, nor has he hidden his face from
him. When he cried to him, he heard. My praise shall be of
you in the great assembly. I will pay my vows before those
who fear him. The poor shall eat and be satisfied. Those who seek him will praise
the Lord. Let your heart live forever.
All the ends of the world shall remember and turn to the Lord.
and all the families of the nations shall worship before you. For
the kingdom is the Lord's, and he rules over the nations. All
the prosperous of the earth shall eat and worship. All those who
go down to the dust shall bow before him, even he who cannot
keep himself alive. A posterity shall serve him.
It will be recounted of the Lord to the next generation. They
will come and declare His righteousness to a people who will be born
that He has done this. Amen. Well, let us pray. But
God, as we come to this passage of Holy Scripture, we are struck
with being on holy ground. We know this is a record of our
Lord's sufferings on the cross. We pray that you would help us
to see these things with the eyes of faith and cause it indeed
to draw from us worship and praise and adoration and great love
to our Savior. We thank you for the lengths
that he went to on our behalf. We thank you for that redemption
accomplished and applied. And we praise you that you've
made us participants in this, by your grace and for your glory.
Again, forgive us for all of our sins and unrighteousness
and guide us now by your Holy Spirit, and we pray through Christ
our Lord. Amen. Well, as I said, the psalm
breaks down into two parts. First, the suffering of Christ,
we'll notice that in verses one to 21a, and then secondly, the
glory of Christ from 21b to verse 31. Like our study last week
in Psalm 110, we noted there that David composed the psalm,
the text of scripture tells us he did so by inspiration of the
Holy Spirit, but that the triumph and the glory and the majesty
of the psalm far transcends anything that David knew, even at the
apex of his kingly power. Well, Psalm 22 is like that as
well. David wrote it, there's a superscription
there that tells us or indicates that he does, and no doubt David
had a lot of sufferings and trials in his own life, but what we
find in this psalm transcends or exceeds anything that occurred
to David his earthly life. Alec Motier says, the psalm goes
beyond any experience of David's. While it could arise from some
time of his suffering, it goes far beyond such to torture and
death. We are listening to David the
prophet looking forward to the suffering Messiah. As well, many
New Testament passages apply this psalm to our Lord Jesus
Christ. We see it In the Passion narrative,
we see as well Hebrews 2.12 evokes or invokes this particular Psalm
to underscore Christ in the midst of his assembly as the song leader,
as the choir leader, as we sing together, Christ is with us,
according to the author of the book of Hebrews. So as I said,
we'll look first at the suffering of Christ, and there we'll see
three things. First, the lamentation of Christ. Secondly, a description of the
suffering of Christ. And then thirdly, the petitions
of Christ. And the petitions are sort of
mingled out throughout the whole, it's not a three-fold sort of
segment in the way that I suggest. We'll bounce around a bit as
we move our way through Psalm 22. But notice first the lamentation
of Christ, and that's in verses one and two. My God, my God,
why have you forsaken me? Why are you so far from helping
me and from the words of my groaning? Oh my God, I cry in the daytime,
but you do not hear and in the night season and I'm not silent. Of course, that first verse is
what Jesus cites or what Jesus recites on the cross according
to Matthew 27, especially in verses 45 and 46. We read now
from the sixth hour until the ninth hour, there was darkness
over all the land. And about the ninth hour, Jesus
cried out with a loud voice saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani. That is, my God, my God, why
have you forsaken me? Now certainly that's a bit of
a puzzling statement when you take it at face value. How could
God the Son be forsaken by God the Father? So in terms of explanation,
we ought to notice first what it doesn't mean, and then secondly
what it does mean. It does not mean, first of all,
that there was any division among the persons of the Trinity. That
cannot happen. It could not happen. It has never
happened, and it will never happen. The unity of the divine nature
and the triunity of the persons in the Godhead forbid such an
interpretation, that there was some division among the persons
of the Godhead. As well, the three persons did
not suffer on the cross. You see sometimes in theology
that people will suggest such a thing. That's not it at all. Christ, according to His humanity,
suffered on the cross for us men and for our salvation. So
the cry does not mean there was a division among the persons
of the Trinity. The cry also does not mean that
there was a dissolution of the hypostatic union. Now by hypostatic
union we refer to the one person of Christ with the two natures. And the dissolution would be
that there was somehow a division or a separation or a destruction
of that union. Our confession is very clear.
It says, so that two whole perfect and distinct natures were inseparably
joined together. One of the mysteries of our religion
is that while Christ hung on the cross, he was still the God-man. He was still the divine word
who assumed our humanity. The distinct natures were inseparably
joined together in one person, without conversion, composition,
or confusion, which person is very God and very man, yet one
Christ, the only mediator between God and man. So there was no
destruction in terms of the Trinity and no destruction in terms of
the hypostatic union of our Lord. So we ask the question then,
what does the cry mean? The Lord Jesus suffered on the
cross according to his humanity. The Lord Jesus suffered on the
cross according to his humanity for us men and for our salvation. Remember, our sin, according
to 2 Corinthians 5.21, is heaped upon the Savior, and it's punished
in the Savior. The forsakenness is the penal
sanctions involved with our law-breaking of God's holy commandments. And
so Christ on the cross suffers in our place. Hillary says, nay,
it was we who were forsaken and disregarded, so that it was as
appropriating our personality that he offered these prayers.
I think Aquinas is right on the ball. He says, Christ spoke these
words in the person of a sinner or of the church. So this that
he experienced was due to us men for our salvation. So the forsakenness in short
was simply the removal of the divine favor at the point of
the penal sufferings of our Lord Jesus Christ. The Lord Jesus
suffered on the cross for the duration determined by the Father.
He was forsaken. And remember, the Lord Jesus
was delivered to the cross by the Father. Romans 8, 32. He who did not spare his own
son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with
him also freely give us all things? He delivered him up for us all. or in the prophet Isaiah, yet
it pleased the Lord to bruise him, he has put him to grief. And so it's that bruising, it's
that grief, that's wherein lies the explanation of the forsakenness
by the Son of God from the Father. Again, it's not a breach of the
doctrine of the Trinity, it's not a dissolution of the hypostatic
union, it is Christ as our surety, going to the uttermost lengths
to suffer on behalf of all those whom the Father had given Him.
So the Lord Jesus suffered on the cross and experienced the
withdrawal of the Father's favor, again, according to His humanity. The favor was withdrawn, but
not the Father. Whatever forsakenness means,
it cannot mean that there was any removal of the father from
the son. Because all throughout the Psalm,
the son is calling upon the father. And that would be absolutely
ludicrous if he did not know that he had his father's ear.
Listen to David Dixon. He says, Christ, as man, lying
under the curse of the law for us, was really deserted and forsaken
for a time. Again, not completely abandoned. Oftentimes, that's what forsakenness
comes to mean, that he was abandoned by the Father. In fact, that
makes its way into popular hymnody and popular songs. It wasn't
an abandonment. The forsakenness was the suffering
that the Son endured on our behalf in terms of penal sanction. So
again, Dixon, Christ as man lying under the curse of the law for
us was really deserted and forsaken for a time in regard, notice,
of all sensible consolation. It's like when we go through,
and I don't want to sort of compare our goings through with what
Christ is going through, but when we're afflicted or we have
hardships or when we have trials, we don't, or we shouldn't, interpret
it as being abandoned by the Father. God doesn't abandon His
children. God doesn't leave them without
Him. Now, for a time, there might
be a lack of sensible consolation, but that is a far cry different
than suggesting there was some sort of abandonment of the Son by the Father. Dixon goes on, for it behooved
Him to bear the wrath. or effects of wrath due to our
sins really, so far as might satisfy for us and relieve us
from wrath. It is true the man Christ could
no more be forsaken in regard of the divine presence supporting
him than the personal union of the two natures could be dissolved.
But in regard of sensible consolation, the goodness, the favor, the
kindness, and again, that's not suggesting that that was somehow
sacrificed or compromised on the part of the Father, But in
terms of the experience of the Son who stood for us on that
cross and received in Himself the penalty due to our sins,
there was that absence. But in regard of sensible consolation,
He was, by way of punishment for our sins and by way of cursing
our sin in Him, really in our stead for a while deprived as
man of the sense of the comfort of His own Godhead. So He's dealing
with the whole hypostatic union part. As well, we've got good,
solid men in our camp, I think, that probably explain it a lot
better than I'm trying to. Listen to Matthew Henry. Christ
was made sin for us, a curse for us. And therefore, though
God loved him as a son, he frowned upon him as a surety. That's
what the cry, we call it the cry of dereliction, that's what
this means. My God, my God, why have you
forsaken me? It's Christ according to his
humanity on the cross, suffering the wrath and fury of God most
high. This is an indicator of true
humanity. What true man, what real human
being wouldn't cry this way under such affliction? Gil says, but
he was now without a sense of the gracious presence of God
and was filled as the surety of his people with a sense of
divine wrath, which their iniquities he now bore deserved and which
was necessary for him to endure in order to make full satisfaction
for them. For one part of the punishment
of sin is loss of the divine presence. And then John Flavel,
it was a penal desertion inflicted on him for satisfaction for those
sins of ours which deserve that God should forsake us forever
as the damned are forsaken by him. So the lamentation of Christ
is at the point of what he experiences directly under the wrath and
fury of God the Father. We move then to a description
of the suffering of Christ. Now certainly we have more in
this psalm than we do in the passion narrative concerning
the physical sufferings of our Lord Jesus. You hear that sometimes. Well, why would you sing Psalms
in the church? There's no Jesus in the Psalms.
You get more information about Christ on the cross from Psalm
22 than you do from Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. I'm not
suggesting that they're bankrupt. I'm not suggesting that they
don't give us information, but I'm suggesting they don't spell
it out in the way that the Savior spells it out himself in Psalm
22. He describes for us in vivid
detail the sufferings that he endured in his passion. Note first the reproach of men,
verses 6 to 8. He says, but I am a worm and
no man. The Messiah is looked upon as
a worm by men. This is a powerful statement. I am a worm and no man. Now think
about it for a moment. If we had public execution, which
I would argue we should, but if we did and we saw somebody
being publicly executed, our thoughts would probably not run
toward, there's a hero in society. There's a guy everybody should
model themselves after. There's the kind of guy every
woman should try to seek as a hot, no, we wouldn't think that. We
would think that's disgusting. This guy deserves what's coming
to him. That guy gets what the justice
has demanded for him. So Christ says, I am a worm and
no man, a reproach of men and despised by the people. Gil says,
Christ calls himself a worm on account of the opinion that men
of the world had of him. Now, if you struggle with this
interpretation, consider the prophet Isaiah, Isaiah 53, two
and three. For he shall grow up before him
as a tender plant and as a root out of dry ground. He has no
form or comeliness, and when we see him, there is no beauty
that we should desire him. He is despised and rejected by
men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief. And we hid, as it
were, our faces from him. He was despised and we did not
esteem him. So when Christ here says, I am
a worm and no man, expressing what his experience was on the
cross. They shook the head. They looked
at him. They ridiculed him. Notice in
verses 7 and 8, all those who see me ridicule me. They shoot
out the lip. They shake the head saying, he
trusted in the Lord. Let him rescue him. Let him deliver
him since he delights in him. That is precisely Matthew's gospel. That is precisely chapter 27,
verses 39 to 44. Remember at the base of the cross,
the religious leaders, those men of renown and dignity, are
mocking the crucified Messiah. And so Christ is reporting all
of that vis-a-vis firsthand in Psalm 22. Again, I'm not mitigating
the glory of the passion narratives in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John,
but Psalm 22 feeds those, and Psalm 22 in some sense exceeds
those. I would suggest that if you're
not singing the Psalms of David in public worship, you're missing
out a lot on the glory and the suffering and the blessedness
of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. He moves from the reproach
of men to the beast attack by beastly men. Verses 12 and 13,
verse 16, verse 20, verse 21. Bulls, lion, dogs, dog, lion's
mouth, horns of the wild, oxen. He's using animals to describe
the actions of men that are directed against him while he's on the
cross. The language is vivid, and the
language is very expressive of the kinds of sin that is in the
hearts of men. As Davis says, he describes his
suffering in beastly terms. Bulls surround him, verse 12.
But in the next verse, bulls become a lion that tears up its
prey and roars. In verse 16, dogs circle around. These are not the house pet variety,
but the half-wild garbage moochers of the Near East. But the canines
are human. They're a congregation of evildoers. The beast imagery implies, as
Alec Mottier says, that the assault lacks any of the constraints
of humanity. It was a wretched, bloodthirsty,
lawless frenzy on the part of the persons that nailed our blessed
Savior to the cross. And that is precisely what he
is narrating for us in this particular passage of Holy Scripture. Whence
the puzzlement that we find when we move our way through the gospel
of John to see their antipathy toward the Son of God. If we
understand the passion and what it all culminated in, we shouldn't
be shocked at Jesus' harsh words directed against the religious
leaders of his own day. These men that would rally up
the crowd, these men that would incite the multitudes to cry,
away with him, away with him, crucify him. They were beastly
men. They were like bulls, they were
like lions, they were like those given over to reprobate activity
as they target for destruction the very Messiah sent by God
to save his people from their sin. Now in all of this, the
resolve of the Lord Jesus is on full display in the Psalm,
but as well in Hebrews 12 too. Who for the joy that was set
before him, endured the cross, despising the shame. So all throughout
our Lord Jesus Christ, he set his face like a flint to go to
Jerusalem. Once he was in Jerusalem, he
sat silent or stood silent before the Sanhedrin, and he ultimately
goes through all that was purposed for him for our salvation. Notice he moves on to the torture
inflicted by men in verses 14 to 18. Again, you have to see
how this transcends what David experienced. David certainly
had a hard life. He had many adversities. He says
as much, but the Lord had delivered him from them all. 2 Samuel 4,
1 Kings 2, David bookends his life with that statement. He
knew many adversities, but the Lord was faithful to deliver
him from them all. But none of his adversities included
the kind of torture and the suffering and the ignominy that was enforced
upon him by these wretches. Now note the effects of crucifixion
in verses 14 and 15. Makes sense for one crucified. Remember that little piece of
wood that the victim stood on was to sort of keep him intact
so long as his lungs would continue to function. They typically broke
the legs when they wanted to speed up death. So once the legs
were broke, the body would extend and he would asphyxiate. But
in this he says, I am poured out like water and all my bones
are out of joint. My heart is like wax, it is melted
within me. My strength is dried up like
a pot shirt and my tongue clings to my jaws. You have brought
me to the dust of death. Notice that constant and persistent
acknowledgement of the providence and the sovereignty of his father.
He's not mitigating the guiltiness of the lion, of the bulls. He's not mitigating the conduct
of these beastly men. But he understands, according
to his reality as the divine son, who by the Father's sending
comes to save us from our sins. He says, you have brought me
to the dust of death. I think this is echoed in John
19, 28 to 30. After this, Jesus, knowing that
all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled,
said, I thirst. Now, a vessel full of sour wine
was sitting there, and they filled the sponge with sour wine, put
it on hyssop and put it to his mouth. So when Jesus had received
the sour wine, he said, it is finished. And bowing his head,
he gave up his spirit. And then note the specific reference
to crucifixion in verses 16b to 18. 16a, for dogs have surrounded
me. Again, these aren't canines.
This isn't your family pet. It's much, much worse than that,
kids. You know what's much, much worse than a vicious, vile dog
is a vicious, vile man. A man with sin in his heart and
rebellion against Yahweh and His Christ, and a man who has
purpose to despise and to destroy the very Messiah sent by the
Father to save His people from their sins. For dogs have surrounded
me, the congregation of the wicked has enclosed me, they pierced
my hands and my feet, I can count all my bones, they look and stare
at me, they divide my garments among them, and for my clothing
they cast lots. Now, the English versions here
follow the Septuagint. The Septuagint is the Greek translation
of the Hebrew Old Testament. A man by the name of Reitlnick
makes the observation with reference to the Masoretic Text. If you notice, if you're using
the New King James, there's a reading in the margin ascribed to the
Masoretic Text. And it's wildly different than
what you have here, and they pierced my hands and my feet.
As I said, the English versions follow the Septuagint here. But Reitlnick makes the observation,
plainly the Masoretic text rendering avoids the Christological implications
of predicting the crucifixion. Don't miss that. If there is
a specifically Christological reading in the Masoretic text,
I'm not saying don't trust your Masoretic text. That's not what
I'm saying. But understand, if on the basis
of this particular passage of the specimen, if there's something
that sounds exactly like what happened to Jesus, and there's
a bit of an obscuring of that, at least Reitlnick is suggesting
that that's what happened. Plainly, the Masoretic text rendering
avoids the Christological implications of predicting the crucifixion,
thereby taking the less messianic rendering and making it more
acceptable to Judaism. Dale Ralph Davis makes the observation,
in 1997 a Hebrew text from Nahal Hever was published which actually
reads, they have pierced. And this Hebrew text is a thousand
years earlier than our traditional Hebrew text. The Greek translation
of the Septuagint from about 200 BC also took it this way. In other words, the affirmation
that this is a specifically Christ-centered messianic reading, it's there. It's extant. It's not that, you
know, English translators or the LXX said, well, let's just
bolster this messianic interpretation that it lands on Christ and let's
throw this in there. No, that's not what happened.
So there is a specific reference to crucifixion. Now, the Roman
Empire wasn't even in play at this time, let alone crucifixion
by the Roman Empire. So many, many years before the
crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ, we read in Psalm 22 that
the Lord Jesus Christ is going to be crucified. This is why,
or at least one of the reasons why, among many other texts,
at times Jesus got not impatient the way I get, because I sin
when I'm impatient, but Jesus would upbraid his disciples.
Have you not read? You don't have an expectation
that the way that the Messiah would lead many sons to glory
would be through suffering? How do you come through Isaiah
53, the suffering servant of Yahweh, and not conclude that
the one that the Father sends must to some degree suffer? Or
how do you read the Proto-Evangel in Genesis 3.15 and not see some
sort of suffering on behalf of the Savior? His heel's going
to be bruised. There's going to be something
that obtains with reference to the Messiah. So there is a specific
reference here to the crucifixion and a description. They pierced
my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones. They
look and stare at me. They divide my garments among
them, and for my clothing they cast lots. We know that. They
do that in Matthew 27 at verse 35. And then finally, under the
head of suffering, note the petition of Christ. His confidence in
the Father is not confined to His state of exaltation. His
confidence in the Father is expressed in the midst of suffering. I
already read that in Hebrews chapter 12, who for the joy that
was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame. He knew that once the cross and
once the shame was over, there was joy set before him, vis-a-vis
the glory of God and the salvation of the bringing of many sons
to glory. And so before the petitions proper, note the affirmation
of the Father's perfections. He's going through great distress. He is crying out, or has cried
out, why hast thou forsaken me? But in verse three he says, but
you are holy, enthroned in the praises of Israel. This is not
a man abandoned. This is not a man deserted as
if there was no recognition or realization whatsoever of his
father. And he never once questions the
father's holiness in the midst of it. We go there, don't we? Something bad happens to us and
we start to get this sneaking suspicion that maybe God's holiness,
maybe God's goodness, maybe God's kindness is on a bit of a holiday.
Because if it wasn't, why am I going through what I'm going
through? not so with the Son of God, not so with the Son according
to His humanity, but you are holy, enthroned in the praises
of Israel. The forsakenness of the Son does
not mitigate the holiness of the Father, and the forsakenness
of the Son highlights the holiness of the Father. Spurgeon said,
however ill things may look, there is no ill in thee, O God.
We, excuse me, are very apt to think and speak hardly of God
when we are under his afflicting hand. But not so the obedient
son. He knows too well his father's
goodness to let outward circumstances libel his character. There is
no unrighteousness with the God of Jacob. He deserves no censures. Let him do what he will. He is
to be praised and to reign enthroned amid the songs of his chosen
people." That's a glorious expression. of blessedness on the part of
the Savior. But you are holy, enthroned in
the praises of Israel." Notice that he moves in terms of perfection
to God's faithfulness. Verse 4, our fathers trusted
in you. They trusted and you delivered
them. They cried to you and were delivered. They trusted in you
and were not ashamed. Verses 9 and 10. He's not saying
this in a comparative way. You know, you helped the fathers, but you
didn't help me. No, he says, that's one of the
glories, one of the perfections that is yours, Father, is that
you were faithful to the fathers. You've been faithful to me throughout
the entirety of the time, since you brought me forth from my
mother's womb. You're good and you do good. And by way of a practical application,
I don't want to again parallel our suffering with the Savior's.
That is absolutely ludicrous. But man, we should learn from
the Savior here. Instead of impugning the holiness
of God or the faithfulness of God when we go through some strait
or some hardship or some difficulty, let us learn from the Savior
on how to deal Let us learn from the Savior that at times there
are hard things that we have to undergo, that at times there
are travails, that at times there is suffering, that at times to
be conformed under the image of His blessed Son, then we too
must suffer, then we too must have hardship. Let us guard against
the tendency when any bad thing comes. Where's the holy God?
Where's the faithful God? That is not the mindset of the
Savior as He's suffering on the cross. It is not a lack of confidence
in His Father. And I provide that, the affirmation
of the Father's perfections, to tie it to His petitions, because
He prays as a man who believes those verities. Notice the presence
of trouble and the confidence he has in the Father evokes the
petition in verse 11. Be not far from me, for trouble
is near, for there is none to help. The presence of trouble
and the faithfulness of God evokes the petition in verse 19. But
you, O Lord, do not be far from me. O my strength, hasten to
help me. The presence of trouble and his
confidence in the Father evokes the petition in verse 20, deliver
me from the sword. And the presence of trouble and
the confidence in his father evokes the petition in verse
21, save me. So this isn't an utter complete
abandonment. The forsakenness is his experience
of the wrath and fury of God in our place for the satisfaction
of divine justice. The psalm opens up for us in
a way that no other place in scripture does the glory of the
sufferings of our Lord Jesus Christ. It's a commentary written
by a man named Herman Ritterboss on the gospel of John. I'm not
using him this time around, but the last time I preached on John,
this caught my attention in John 19.18a. It says, where they crucified
him. Ritterbaugh says the New Testament
has no trace of any passion mysticism oriented to the physical torture
of Jesus. He's right. I looked at Cameron
of A, and he was raised Roman Catholic. I was raised Roman
Catholic. If any of the rest of you were
unfortunate enough to have to go through that, you'll know
that they do a lot with the physical torture of Jesus. Unfortunately, Protestants are
aping them now, the stations of the cross, passion play, mysticism. I think that Ritterbos is right
on. The New Testament has no trace
of any passion mysticism oriented to the physical torture of Jesus. Like there's something that we
should just crave about every time Jesus fell, every drop of
blood that fell off his head. And I'm not suggesting we shouldn't
think through the implications of his physical suffering. But
what I am suggesting is that we get a lot more of it in Psalm
22. We get a lot more of it than we do in Matthew's Gospel, in
Mark, or Luke, or John. If you want to know something
of what the Savior, according to His humanity, went through
on your behalf, Psalm 22 is about the best window you can look
through. And then, I don't want to just blow through it, but
because of time, we're going to have to blow through it. The
latter part. The latter part of the Psalm
focuses on the glory of Christ. I think the specific reference
is the ascension and the current session, similar to what we see
there in Psalm 110 or what we saw last week. And I just want
to break down 21b to 26, and then 27 to 31. I think 21b to
26 deals with the blessing upon his people. In other words, what Jesus does
and what Jesus went through and the sufferings from verses 1
to 21a are for the benefit of others. It's for the benefit
of us, who for us men and for our salvation came down from
heaven. Notice we have this response
in verse 21b, you have answered me. The answer of the father. Notice
we have the adoption of his people. Verse 22, I will declare your
name to my brethren in the midst of the assembly. I will praise
you. Ambrose said he is Lord by nature or our Lord by nature
and becomes our brother by grace. That is glorious language. I
will declare your name to my brethren, the one who was circled
by these bulls, the one who was gaped at by these wretches, the
one who was pierced by these filthy criminals. This one has
done this for us men and for our salvation. Notice the adoration
of God predicated on what the Son had accomplished in the first
part of the Psalm. Notice in verses 23 and following. You who fear the Lord, praise
Him. All you descendants of Jacob,
glorify Him. And fear Him, all you offspring
of Israel. For he has not despised nor abhorred
the affliction of the afflicted, nor has he hidden his face from
him. But when he cried to him, he heard. My praise shall be
of you in the great assembly. I will pay my vows before those
who fear him. The poor shall eat and be satisfied. Those who seek him will praise
the Lord. Let your heart live forever. The fear of God is a
wonderful outflow of what the work of the Savior on our behalf
accomplishes. We see that reason in verse 24. He is not despised, nor abhorred
the affliction of the afflicted. We see as well this emphasis
on corporate worship. My praise shall be of you in
the great assembly. So we sing praises to God as
we join the elder brother in singing praises to the father.
We do so based on the reality of the first half of the Psalm
and what the son of God went through on behalf of guilty,
vile, helpless sinners. And we see this emphasis on constant
provision. The poor shall eat and be satisfied.
Those who seek Him will praise the Lord. Let your heart live
forever. So that's the blessing upon His people, but note the
extent of His kingdom in verses 27 to 31. The nations of the
earth will be included in this redemptive plan. So I read Psalm
67 at the outset. Let the nations be glad. Cause
your face to shine upon the peoples, that the way of Yahweh would
be known throughout the entirety of the earth. This picks up a
theme that's not just a little one in scripture. God's promises
to Abraham are about nations included in those blessings.
We see it all throughout the Psalms. We see it all throughout
the prophets. We see it in our Lord's words,
go therefore and make disciples of all the nations. We've got
this wonderful depiction or presentation of the glorious extension of
Christ's kingdom. All the ends of the world shall
remember and turn to the Lord and all the families of the nation
shall worship before you for the kingdom is the Lord's and
he rules over the nations. This is the emphasis in Holy
Scripture. It brings us to the book of Revelation
from every tribe, every tongue, every people, every nation, a
great multitude that no man can number. Notice as well, it's
not just going to affect the locations in the earth, but it's
going to be generational. Notice in verses 30 and 31, a
posterity shall serve him. It will be recounted of the Lord
to the next generation. They will come and declare his
righteousness to a people who will be born that he has done
this. This is an old covenant equivalent
to a Matthew 16. I will build my church and the
gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. It is all predicated
on the finished and successful and the glorious work of the
Redeemer recorded in the first half of the psalm. The suffering
of our blessed Savior inevitably leads to His conquest of the
nations, to His extension of His Church, or the advancement
of His Church, to the blessedness of His people with every spiritual
blessing in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus. Well, in conclusion,
we see the theology of the Psalter. It's about Jesus. It's all about
Jesus. If you want to know more of Jesus,
read the Psalms. Meditate on the Psalms. Sing
the Psalms. Pray the Psalms. And when you
see particular Psalms describing the sinfulness of the Psalmist,
you think, well, that can't be true of Jesus. He who knew no
sin, or God made him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that
we might become the righteousness of God in him. Those Psalms that
speak concerning the sinfulness of the psalmist, those are not
accepted when I suggest that the Psalms are about Jesus. There
was an imputation of our sin to the Savior. It's like Psalm
88. Remember when Dr. Renahan preached
that last year during the conference season? He made that application. He said, this is a description
of the sufferings of our Lord Jesus. He was right on. He was right on. The Psalms are
about Jesus. In fact, turn to Hebrews 2 for
just a moment. I already referred to this passage,
but it's good to see it or get it in front of our eyes here. Verse 10. Hebrews 2, verse 10, for it was
fitting for him, for whom are all things and by whom are all
things, in bringing many sons to glory, to make the captain
of their salvation perfect through sufferings. For both he who sanctifies
and those who are being sanctified are all of one, for which reason
he is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, I will declare
your name to my brethren. In the midst of the assembly,
I will sing praise to you. So there's that verse we just
saw in Psalm 22, I will declare your name to my brethren in the
midst of the assembly, I will sing praise to you. But look
at the first word of verse 12, saying. What is the apostle saying? The apostle is saying, when you
read Psalm 22, that's Jesus saying to you. That's Jesus speaking
to you. That's Jesus declaring truth
to you. He is not ashamed to call them
brethren, saying, I will declare your name to my brethren. In
the midst of the assembly, I will sing praise to you. We wouldn't
need to even make the comparison. Whatever suffering David had
was far exceeded by the sufferings of Jesus. The psalmist tells
us when we read Psalm 22, we're hearing the voice of Jesus. So
brethren, make much of the Psalms in 2025. Make much of the Psalms
in private and in corporate worship. As well, the glory of the Savior.
The Psalm moves in the direction expounded in the Gospels and
Epistles. Life, suffering, death, exaltation. The Psalm moves in the direction
summarized in Hebrews 2.10. He's bringing many sons to glory. How did he do that? Through suffering. And the psalm displays the glory
of the Lord Jesus Christ and the blessed effect of his death
and resurrection. Verses 27 and 28, all the ends
of the world shall remember and turn to the Lord. and all the
families of the nation shall worship before you. For the kingdom
is the Lord's and he rules over the nations." Well, may God encourage
our hearts. May God strengthen us as we participate
in the supper. And may he indeed confirm us
in our faith, cause it to grow. And may we see in the Psalms,
the Lord Jesus Christ. And may we see specifically in
Psalm 22, the suffering and the glory of the Messiah. Well, let
us pray.