The Crucifixion of Christ, Part 2
Sermons on John
You can turn with me in your Bibles to John's Gospel, John chapter 19. John chapter 19, our focus this morning will be verses 23 to 27, as we stand at the foot of the cross and witness one of the most, or the most rather, significant event that has ever occurred in the history of man, the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ. I do want to pick up reading in verse 16 at chapter 19. Then He, that's Pontius Pilate, delivered Him, the Lord Jesus Christ, to them, the soldiers, to be crucified. Then they took Jesus and led Him away. And He, bearing His cross, went out to a place called the place of a skull, which is called in Hebrew Golgotha, where they crucified Him and two others with Him, one on either side and Jesus in the center. Now Pilate wrote a title and put it on the cross, and the writing was, Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews. Then many of the Jews read this title, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. Therefore the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, Do not write the King of the Jews, but he said, I am the King of the Jews. Pilate answered, What I have written, I have written. Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments and made four parts, to each soldier a part, and also the tunic. Now the tunic was without seam, woven from the top in one piece. They said, therefore, among themselves, let us not tear it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be, that the scripture might be fulfilled, which says, they divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots. Therefore, the soldiers did these things. Now, there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother and his mother's sister, Mary, the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus therefore saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing by, he said to his mother, woman, behold your son. Then he said to the disciple, behold your mother. And from that hour, that disciple took her to his own home. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our Father in heaven, we come to this passage of holy scripture, a holy of holies in the word of God, and we pray that you would help us to approach it with reverence, with awe, with great love and adoration and worship, the great lengths that our Savior went to on our behalf to give himself as a sacrifice for our sins. We thank you for so great a salvation. We thank you that you have blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus. We pray that you would multiply those blessings to others in our midst that are dead in their trespasses and sins. We pray that you would awaken effectually by the Holy Spirit those who are in darkness and call them forth to faith in the Son of God who loved sinners and who gave himself for sinners. Do forgive us and cleanse us now from all unrighteousness and everything that darkens our mind and understanding. God, guide us by your Holy Spirit as we look with awe at this passage of Holy Writ, and we pray in Jesus' name, amen. Well, as we've worked our way through the passion narrative of our Lord Jesus Christ, we see in John 18 that he's arrested and that he is first appears before, or first he appears before Annas, the high priest, and then Caiaphas and the Sanhedrin, and then they turn him over to Pontius Pilate, Pilate sends him over to Herod, Herod sends him back to Pilate, and now Pilate renders this guilty verdict. Remember there was blackmail exercised on Pilate by the Sanhedrin, the unbelieving Jews blackmailed him. They say so much in John 19 when they're dealing with Pontius Pilate. So then they question Pilate's title of Jesus on the cross, Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews. And in verse 22, Pilate answered, what I have written, I have written. It was his last act of defiance to this political blackmail. But nevertheless, he carries out this act, this tragedy, but we know that ultimately God the Father had ordained it for the salvation of all those whom the Father had given to the Son. So when you look at verse 16, we're to read that, then he delivered him. in two ways. We've got Judas, we've got the Sanhedrin, we've got Pontius Pilate, we've got the godless multitudes crying out, away with him, away with him, crucify him. But we need to read it theological. God delivered up his own son. The prophet Isaiah says, it pleased Yahweh to bruise him. and he has put him to grief. John 8, 32, the apostle says that God, who did not spare his son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things? So what we see in terms of the wickedness of man is ultimately the providence, the purpose, and the plan of God to save His people from their sins. So as we continue now, as I mentioned, we're at the foot of the cross. We're seeing what's going on. Remember that none of the gospel writers get into the physical torture and the gore and the blood and all the things that Hollywood and all the things that artists have picked up. but rather they show us those things that are most important in terms of our theological understandings. We've seen the crucifixion of the Lord in 16b to 22. We pick up this morning at the division of His garments in verses 23 to 24, and then finally his care for his mother in verses 25 to 27. But note with me first under the division of his garments in verse 23, then the soldiers when they had crucified Jesus took his garments and made four parts to each soldier a part and also the tunic. Now the tunic was without seam woven from the top in one piece They said, therefore, among themselves, let us not tear it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be. So this was a custom for Roman soldiers. When you put a man to death, you got to take his property. You got to take his garments. For us in a thrift store ridden age, garments don't hold as much sway. But in the scriptures, it was very valuable. It was a prized possession. And here we see that the soldiers are capitalizing on that. It says initially that they divided his garments and made four parts, a part to each of the soldier. That was the outer garments. So they're likely a cloak, but it could have been the constituent parts, belt, sandals, head covering, whatever they could, they divided amongst themselves. But then notice the amount of space spent on this tunic. The tunic is the undergarment, and that 23B and 24a speak specifically about this tunic, I think John, especially based on what we've seen in John's gospel, wants us to think theologically. He wants us to think antitypically. He wants us to think that more is going on than just this stripping of his garments and dividing them up. So with reference to the tunic, as I said, a space of a whole verse is given to it. So the tunic is the inner garment, and because of the amount of space on this tunic, as I suggest, there ought to be a spiritual or a theological application. And I think that this is enforced when we consider that in the Greek translation of the Old Testament, you find that this language of woven applies to priestly garments. So the options with reference to a more spiritual interpretation or theological interpretation is that the tunic represents the unity of believers, the tunic highlights the self-giving of the son, but I take it as the tunic evokes the imagery of the high priest. And as I said, when you look in the Old Testament, you see the description given of those men who put together the garments for the priesthood, they put together the tabernacle. God took artisans, he didn't go to Home Depot and find a few day laborers, but rather he put the spirit in men that were already artisans, men that were already accomplished in their trades, and he used them to build the tabernacle and to build the temple. There was no expense spared. It wasn't a sort of a thrift store god where you just sort of cobbled together a tabernacle or a temple, but no, God Most High demanded the best such that when you get to the temple under Solomon, even the hinges of the doors are made out of gold. And so you have these artisans, you have these craftsmen, you have these men that put together the fabrics and the various furnishings that make up tabernacle and temple and priestly garments. So the use of woven in the Septuagint occurs specifically with reference to priestly garments. As well, the reference to without seam emphasizes the care involved in the craftsmanship behind the high priestly garments. But then notice as well the tunic was without seam, according to verse 23, woven from the top in one piece. And even the soldiers said amongst themselves, let us not tear it, but cast lots for it. Now I doubt the soldiers had a mind to the books of Exodus and Leviticus. No more than Pontius Pilate did when he made several positive confessions concerning the Lord Jesus Christ, or Caiaphas in John chapter 11, when he basically spoke of substitutionary atonement, but sometimes men speak better than they know. And the fact that these soldiers don't want to rip apart the tunic and divide it into four places indicates, again, a connection to the priestly garments in the Old Testament. Listen to Exodus 28.32, there shall be an opening for his head in the middle of it. It shall have a woven binding all around its opening, like the opening in a coat of mail, so that it does not tear. Leviticus 21.10, the priest was forbidden from tearing his garments. It says, he who is the high priest among his brethren, on whose head the anointing oil was poured, And it was consecrated to wear the garments, shall not uncover his head, nor tear his clothes." Now brethren, we're not just jumping into verses 23 and 24 trying to interpret the significance of a tunic and haphazardly connecting it to the old covenant priesthood. John has made these connections all throughout. When Jesus stands before Annas and Caiaphas, there's ambiguity as to who the high priest is. John's point is that Jesus is the high priest. When we see Jesus arrested in the garden in John 18, 12, He's bound and He's transported, just like the binding of Isaac in Genesis 22. The fact that Jesus is arrested in a garden connects us with the garden in Genesis 1-3. And then as we move through the narrative, behold the man, Pilate announces. We see connection to Genesis 3.22. We see his reference, behold the king, which we know that scripture teaches us that Christ is king. We see this reference to Passover sacrifice in John 19. When is Jesus trotted out to the place of a skull? He's trotted out to the place of the skull at the time of preparation for the Passover. The Apostle Paul will tell us that Jesus Christ is our Passover sacrifice in 1 Corinthians 5, 7. As well, we've got the fact that He's crucified between these two others, these men, these robbers, these thieves, these murderers, and that fulfills what we see in Scripture, that He was numbered with the transgressors. John is conspicuously connecting us back to Old Covenant revelation to show us that Jesus Christ is the one in whom all the promises of God are yea and amen. So I would suggest that when this tunic is referenced, it's not just a throwaway piece of data so that we can understand about the greediness of these Roman soldiers, but it's to illustrate, to highlight, to demonstrate once again that Christ is our high priest. And as I mentioned last week, the obvious implication of this particular scene is that the Savior was stripped naked. He is naked, hanging on the cross. I quoted Spurgeon, I'll do so again. The person of Christ was stripped twice, and although our painters, for obvious reasons, cover Christ upon the cross, there He hung, the naked Savior of a naked race. He who clothed the lilies had not wherewith to clothe himself. He who had clothed the earth with jewels and made for it robes of emeralds had not so much as a rag to conceal his nakedness from a staring, gazing, mocking, hard-hearted crowd. He had made coats of skins for Adam and Eve when they were naked in the garden. He had taken from them those poor fig leaves with which they sought to hide their nakedness, given them something wherewith they might wrap themselves from the cold. but now they part his garments among them, and for his vesture do they cast lots, while he himself, exposed to the pitiless storm of contempt, has no cloak with which to cover his shame. Rosetta B. Pink says a lot more succinctly but as powerfully, the sinful first Adam was clothed by God, the sinless last Adam was unclothed by wicked men. So it indicates something in terms of implication that our Savior hung on that cross naked. Again, we don't celebrate the physical gore and the details in some Roman Catholic fashion, but it behooves us to consider the great lengths that which our Savior went to to save us from our sin. But with reference to the high priestly office of our Lord Jesus Christ. Remember that in the Old Testament you had prophets, you had priests, and you had kings. Jesus is all three. He is our great king. He rules us. He defends us. He governs us. He protects us. He commands us. He legislates for us. What did a prophet do in the Old Testament? The prophet came on behalf of God to men to tell men what God had to say. That's basic, but that's pretty much what they did. The priest went to God on behalf of men. And so when that priest goes to God on behalf of men, he does so in prayer, or what we might call intercession. But he also does it in terms of sacrifice or offering. So our Lord Jesus Christ, as I said, is a king. He's certainly a prophet. He commands what we are supposed to do in terms of church life. He commands what you are supposed to do if you're not a believer. Believe on him and you'll be saved. But he is our great high priest. And one of the books of the Bible that shows that so splendidly and beautifully is the book of Hebrews, and you can turn there. Just a quick amplification on this idea that Christ on the cross is functioning as a priest. One of the most extended treatments of Christ's priestly office is in Hebrews 5.1, and it goes all the way to chapter 10 and verse 18. We certainly don't have time to cover every jot and tittle, but I want to bring out a few thoughts with reference to His priesthood. Now, while you are flipping and while you are turning, we need this priesthood. We need this priesthood desperately. Yes, we need His prophetic ministry. We need to hear from God. We need His kingly ministry. We need to be ruled by God. We need His priestly ministry. Why? Because we're messed up. And by messed up, I mean sinful, wretched, rebellious. We commit transgression against God. We don't do what God says. We not only sin by commission, that means doing what God forbids, but we sin by omission, not doing what God commands. As I said, we're messed up, ethically. We are dead in our trespasses and sins. We drink iniquity like water. We engage in lawlessness and rebellion and wickedness. A brother read from Luke's gospel in Luke chapter eight, and we might just, you know, sort of put it to the side and say, well, that man was demon possessed, but isn't it true of every man, whether he's demon possessed or not? He was clothed and sitting in his right mind. What does that indicate? That he was out of his mind. How do you explain the world today? I would suggest there are a lot of demon-possessed people out there, but even your garden-variety sinner is out of his mind. Why wouldn't we do what God commands us to do? It's not bad. Don't kill people. Oh, come on, God. Don't commit adultery with your neighbor's wife. Oh, come on. We're out of our minds. Well, what puts us back into our right mind? It's not more education, not against education. It's not through more discipline, not against discipline. It's through blood atonement. It's through Christ crucified. It's through the priestly office. As Owen says, that sacerdotal office of Christ is one that is a necessity for sinful men and women. Why is it important? Because we're sinners against a holy God. And if we have sinned against a holy God, guess what the inevitability is? We will suffer that holy God's righteous judgment for all eternity. It is that simple. God is a moral governor in this universe. He has commanded how we are supposed to conduct ourselves. He has threatened punishment for those who conduct themselves otherwise, and that punishment the Bible calls hell. It is a place of everlasting torment. It is a place of everlasting judgment. It is a place of everlasting banishment from all of the goodness of God Most High. So without the priestly office of Jesus Christ, without what He does on the cross, without that intercession, without that prayer, without that offering of sacrifice, we end up in hell. Now if you're not a believer, hopefully your interest is piqued because at the foot of the cross we learn what really matters. It's not our personal fulfillment, it's our salvation. It's not our joy and happiness, it's justification by faith alone. It's all about the Lord of Glory. It's all about Jesus Christ and His function as priest on the cross and John calls us to think about it because he talks in a verse about the tunic. What did that old covenant priest do? He made sacrifice for the people. For those perhaps that are unfamiliar with the Old Testament, there's a book called Leviticus. I've often thought that many readers who start out in Genesis usually abandon ship probably long before Leviticus, but at Leviticus for sure, which is a shame because Leviticus is background to the glory of Christ. It's all about Jesus. But in the book of Leviticus, there's a day called the Day of Atonement in Leviticus chapter 16. Literarily, structurally, theologically, it's the center of the book of Leviticus. And what happens on that Day of Atonement? It only happens one time out of the year. The priest takes off all of his glorious garments, but he leaves on that tunic, and then he goes to the tabernacle. That's the place where God would meet with His people. And the priest would go to that tabernacle, and he wouldn't go without blood. He'd kill an animal and he would take the blood into the Holy of Holies and he would sprinkle that blood on the mercy seat for his sin, for the sins of his people, for the altar, for the cult of the religious structure there in Old Covenant Israel. He would do this probably two or three times he went into the Holy of Holies. And then the next thing that the priest would do, they'd take a living goat. We call it the scapegoat. That's where that language comes from. And the priest would put both his hands on the head of that scapegoat and he would confess the transgressions of Israel. He would confess, God forgive us for committing idolatry. God forgive us for committing blasphemy, forgive us for being Sabbath breakers, forgive us for being insubordinate to our parents, forgive us for being murderers and adulterers and thieves and liars and covetous, forgive us of these sins. And then he would take that goat and he would press it off and it would run out into the wilderness. What is that? It's a picture of God's removal of the sin problem of His people. That's what Jesus does on the cross. He's not there for a moral example. This is how you ought to love everybody. Yeah, that's not the primary emphasis. He's there to take the punishment that is due for our sins. We deserve everlasting hell. We deserve everlasting punishment. We deserve everlasting torment. But Christ took it in Himself on the cross. So that when He goes to that cross as the Lamb of God, He takes away the sin of the world. The Bible says that everyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life. It is glorious. It is wonderful. It is blessed. We sing of it in the hymn. We sing, my sin, oh, the bliss of this glorious thought. My sin, not in part, but the whole, is nailed to the cross and I bear it no more. Praise the Lord, praise the Lord. We need the priestly ministry of our Lord Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins and for the imputation of His righteousness. That means His law keeping, His obedience, His never having committed a sin of omission or commission is imputed or given to us and it's received by faith alone. It's the doctrine of justification by faith alone. It's beautiful. When you believe on Jesus, you're forgiven of your sins, but not only are you forgiven of your sins, you're given positively a righteousness by which you may now enter into the presence of God. Imagine if you got an invitation to a wedding and you were supposed to go to the reception and you were supposed to be clothed in a certain way, but you didn't have a suit, you didn't have that kind of a dress, you'd be out of luck, wouldn't you? We need that suit. We need that dress. I mean, that's a weird illustration. Well, it's Jesus' illustration, the parable of the wedding face. You've got to have the right clothes. You've got to have the right attire. You've got to be fit and appropriate. You don't get that through your own doing, through your own dying, through your own redeeming power. You get it through Christ. So in terms of the high priestly office of our Lord Jesus Christ that John calls us to meditate upon as he refers to this tunic, consider the perfection of Jesus' priesthood. Look at Hebrews chapter 5. As I said, 5 to 10 is one of the most extended treatments of the priestly office of Jesus in the Bible. Notice in chapter 5, at verse 3. There's a bit of a contrast going on between Jesus and Aaron. Aaron was sort of the main man with reference to priesthood and his descendants. They would function as high priests. So notice what Aaron had to do according to 5.3. Because of this, he is required as for the people, so also for himself, to offer sacrifices for sin. So Aaron needed that blood for atonement for himself. not blaming Aaron, I'm not saying Aaron's bad, I'm not saying that that somehow puts Aaron, you know, in a category other than us, but look at 5a with reference to our high priest. Though he was a son, this is Jesus, yet he learned obedience by the things which he suffered, and having been perfected, he became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey him. So Christ Unlike Aaron, doesn't have to offer up blood first for his own sins. And what does that indicate? It indicates his perfection. It indicates his spotlessness. Again, if you read through the Old Testament and you see God's demand to the old covenant Israelites in terms of sacrifice, does God say to the children of Israel, you know, find the worst animal in your flock? find the one that's gimped, find the one that's blind, find the loser in the barnyard brawls and bring him to my sacrifice. No, that's not it at all. It says bring the best. In fact, if you read the prophet Malachi, that's exactly what's going on. God upbraids the nation through the prophet Malachi because they were bringing blind and lame sacrifices to the temple. And not only that, they were stealing them on the way. As I've said to the church many times, if you're at the point where you're stealing a sacrifice to present to God, you're pretty much at the bottom of the barrel. Sacrifice pinches. Sacrifice deprives. Sacrifice hurts. So God's demand was for the best. Did that old covenant priesthood ever offer up the best? No. Sinners. The divine Word who became flesh for us men and for our salvation renders up perfect obedience. As well, Christ's priesthood is perpetual. Turn to Hebrews chapter 7. Hebrews chapter 7, again by way of contrast with Aaron's priesthood, and the contrast isn't Aaron was a horrible person. That's not the contrast. The contrast is you had the Old Covenant, it functioned how God purposed for it to function, but now the New Covenant has arrived and it's a better covenant founded on better promises that affords a better hope. All of Old Covenant redemptive history was aiming to this. So it's not bad, it just functioned the way God had purposed it. But notice in 717, for he testifies, you are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. That's why we sang Psalm 110 at the outset of worship. Shows us the king priest, our Lord Jesus Christ. But here, specifically, the author is contrasting Aaron's priesthood with Jesus' priesthood. Aaron's died off. Aaron's didn't have constant recurring succession, but drop down to verse 26, for such a high priest was fitting... I'm sorry, verse 23, and there were many priests because they were prevented by death from continuing. But he, because he continues forever, has an unchangeable priesthood. He's always available. He's always there. And I think that's good news for sinners today. We don't preach a priest who, you know, he used to save pretty good back in the day, but he doesn't do so anymore. No, he's at the right hand of the Father, and anyone who comes to him in faith, he saves. He says so much in John 6, 37, all that the Father gives me will come to me, and the one who comes to me I will certainly not cast out. So Christ's priesthood was perfect, Christ's priesthood is perpetual, and notice the salvation accomplished by this priest. Look at verse 25 in Hebrews 7. Therefore he is also able to save to the uttermost. Those are wonderful words, to the uttermost, or completely, or fully. He doesn't partially save us. I mean, even if he saved us 99.9% and we had to work out that other .01%, we couldn't do it. The demands of God upon us for law keeping is personal, exact, entire, and perpetual. We don't get that the first second we open our eyes in the morning. Do we? Who here, let's have a show of hands, who here wants to boast of their personal, entire, exact and perpetual obedience? If you know yourself a little bit, you're like, nah, I don't even do that in my sleep. I mean, that would mean dreams where I only think positive thoughts of the glory of God and the good of my fellows. Yeah, I'm sure that's everybody's dream life. It's everybody's way. We need perfection. We need an uttermost salvation. Therefore, he is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them. Beautiful. It's an uttermost salvation to uttermost wretches that stand in uttermost need. So no one can ever think, well, you know, I'm just too sinful for this one to ever save. No, no, no, no. The Apostle Paul claimed chief of sinner as a title for himself. The argument's simple. Every less than chief is able to be saved. I'd argue that even those more than that chief are able to be saved. This is an uttermost salvation wrought out by this perfect high priest whose priesthood continues in perpetuity. And this sacrifice actually accomplishes that for which God had purpose. Notice in 722, by so much more, Jesus has become a surety of a better covenant. So we see the perfection of his priesthood, but real quick, we ought to appreciate the perfection of his sacrifice. We've had cause to reflect many times in our studies in John's gospel, the way that John proceeds in putting together his gospel narrative. John 1, 1 to 18 is theology. John 1, 19 to the end is economy, the economy of salvation. And that economy begins, at least in verse 29, with the announcement of the purpose for which the word was made flesh. Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Beautiful, glorious. Sinners should sigh a great big relief when they hear that statement. You mean there is a remedy? You mean there is a fountain open for sin and uncleanness? You mean there is something that can be done with my rebellion and my transgression and my sin? Yeah, it's in Jesus Christ the Lord. So He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. But notice in Hebrews chapter 10, again, this contrast is set up between the old covenant and new covenant. Not that the old was bad, functioned for the purpose for which God sent it, but notice in 10.1, for the law having a shadow of the good things to come and not the very image of the things can never with these same sacrifices which they offer continually year by year make those who approach perfect. I mentioned the Day of Atonement. I mentioned that day when the high priest went into the Holy of Holies, when that high priest laid his hands on the scapegoat. It happened every year. It happened annually. It was central in their religious life. Why? Because it never dealt with sin the way that the Lamb of God deals with sin. So notice, verse 2, for then would they not have ceased to be offered? For the worshipers, once purified, would have had no more consciousness of sins, but in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. Just by way of a side note, note the contrast there in verse three with the Lord's Supper in 1 Corinthians 11. What happens year by year when you go on the Day of Atonement? You're reminded of your sin, which isn't a bad thing. What happens when we eat this bread and we drink this cup? We are reminded of the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. We are reminded that there is atonement. We are reminded that guilty, vile, helpless we, spotless Lamb of God was He. Full atonement can it be? Hallelujah, what a Savior. And then notice in verse 4, for it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins. Therefore, when He came into the world, He said, and then it highlights, underscores, brings to bear very often, and again throughout the book of Hebrews, an emphasis on the once for all sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ. We don't duplicate it. We don't replicate it. We don't go through it over and over again. The supper is a means of grace and it reminds us of that glorious activity, but it's not an atonement. It's not an unbloody atonement. It's not a situation envisaged by the Roman church. It is rather a reminder for the saints of Christ what their Savior has done on their behalf. And then one final text in terms of Hebrews, you can turn to chapter 12, specifically at verse 2. the glory of his priesthood, looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God." So we're at the foot of the cross this morning. We're surveying. We see these soldiers stripping off his garments and throwing lots for his tunic. We're going to see His mother and His disciples standing there at the foot of the cross. But look how the writer to the book of Hebrews says, Enduring the cross means the wrath of man, but even more so the wrath of God, and despising the shame, such as being stripped naked such as being spat upon, such as having a crown of thorns embedded into his head and being covered with blood and gore. He despised that shame. He endured the cross. Why? For the joy that was set before him. What was the joy set before him? The glory of his father and the salvation of us. It really is amazing theology that the apostle articulates with reference to that cross. I would suggest he was stripped naked that we might be clothed with his righteousness. Calvin says, let us also learn that Christ was stripped of His garments that He might clothe us with righteousness, that His naked body was exposed to the insults of men that we may appear in glory before the judgment seat of God. And taking into account what we saw last Sunday, we've got Him numbered with the transgressors. He was numbered among the transgressors that you and I might be received into glory. He's stripped naked, he's numbered amongst the transgressors, not for his sins, not for his crimes, not for anything he had committed personally, but for our sin, our crimes, imputed to him. Paul says in 2 Corinthians 5.21, God made him, Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in him. If I were to ask you to think back, oh, 15 minutes ago, I mentioned justification by faith alone. And in justification, we are forgiven of our sins and we receive the righteousness of Jesus. It's imputed or given to us and it's received by faith alone. Well, that's predicated on another imputation or a giving or a constituting or a reckoning. God made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us. Doesn't mean that Jesus personally committed adultery, but Jesus took, by way of imputation, the sin of adultery that His elect would commit. Again, he's not personally sinful, but God takes our sin, keeps it upon the Savior, punishes the Savior in our place, forgives us as a result of that, and then takes the righteousness of the Savior and gives it to us. Luther called it the glorious exchange. I think you can see why. We're messed up. God takes our messed up-ness, heaps it upon His Son, punishes His Son in our place, and then takes the righteousness of His Son and heaps it up upon us. It is beautiful. And I would suggest that He was crucified that we might have life everlasting. Matthew Henry said, and when we behold what manner of death He died, let us in that behold with what manner of love He loved us. In other words, you can see the extent, the immeasurable love of the Savior for His people when you see the extent and the immeasurable shame and suffering He went through on our behalf. So back to John chapter 19, we see that they are at the foot of the cross, these soldiers, dividing up his garments, casting lots for the tunic. But notice that this is the plan and purpose of God. John never lets us forget that. So the garments are divided. The tunic is left intact. They're going to cast lots for it, whose it shall be. But then note the end of verse 24, that the scripture might be fulfilled, which says, they divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots. Therefore, the soldiers did these things. Again, when we see passages like this, it's not John saying, you know, this was a lucky accident. This just kind of happened in an interesting and curious way. No, it happened the way that it happened because God predetermined, God foreordained, and God announced it in Psalm 22. Psalm 22 we call a psalm of the cross. If you remember in a parallel passage in Matthew's gospel, Jesus from the cross says, my God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? That's a quote from Psalm 22 verse 1. Well, this is a quote from Psalm 22, verse 18. In Psalm 22, 16 to 18, show us the beastly conduct of men at the foot of the cross. In fact, I'll just read it for you. It says, for dogs have surrounded me. The congregation of the wicked has enclosed me. They pierced my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones. They look and stare at me. They divide my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots. So again, it's not a happy accident. It's not a lucky event. It's not like, wow, I can't believe that connection was made. John, you're brilliant. No, this is the plan and purpose of God, which again, I think underscores for us the great love of which the Savior has for us and our response in love. This wasn't plan B in the mind of God. This wasn't, what am I going to do with this helpless lot? How am I going to salvage this mission? It was always His plan and purpose announced in the garden in Genesis chapter 3 at verse 15, that God would put enmity between the seed of the woman and the serpent, that the seed of the woman would crush His head. The rest of the Bible unfolds that. The rest of the Bible shows us that. In fact, Jesus is at the skull place now doing that very thing with reference to His enemies. So the prophet, or the psalmist rather, gives us the very words of Jesus Christ. In fact, if you want to learn more about the physical sufferings, you want to learn more about the physical torture of the Son of God on the cross, Psalm 22 is your place. Psalm 22 gives you far more of a window into the excruciating suffering of Jesus Christ according to His humanity than the Gospel writers do. You want a window into that? Read Psalm 22. It's not about David. It's about David's greater son, the Lord Jesus Christ. But we ought to appreciate before we move on here the sovereignty of God. From the outset of John's gospel, Jesus refers to an hour in John chapter two. We see that hour referred to over and over again. We see Jesus referred to a cup that he must drink, given him by the father in John 18, 11. We see all these references from Jesus concerning the one who sent me. It is my meat to do the will of him who sent me. I always do that which is pleasing to my father. The Lord Jesus Christ has been scripted. He has been purposed. It has been determined. When man sins against God, God orchestrates the way of salvation. I'd argue He orchestrated it even before man fell into sin, but the reality is that Christ came with a purpose, and Christ fulfills that purpose And even here at the base or foot of the cross, we see what I think Klink says is right. Even as Christ is nailed to the cross, the soldiers below Him, gambling on the garments previously belonging to Him, do nothing outside the will and control of God. They are doing quite simply what God said long ago they would do. right down to these soldiers exercising one of the perks of their particular profession, gambling or throwing lots for these garments and for the tunic. What's happening? God's will is being done. Jesus in the garden says, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me. Nevertheless, Father, not my will, but thine be done. What's the cup? It's the wrath of God. It's the judgment of God. It's the fury of God. It's that punishment that I referred to earlier. that sinners will undergo for their sins against a holy God in that hell to come. But Christ took that on the cross. He took our punishment. He satisfied divine justice. That's the glory of the cross. You see, this isn't just one religious system among others. It's not just kind of a philosophy out there that is kind of held captive in the minds of some. This is God's Word. This is God's revelation. This is God's purpose and plan. This is the mission of the Son of God who assumed our humanity and lived in this sin-cursed world, who lived in a cesspool, who lived amongst men that said, away with him, away with him, crucify him. This is God's glory. And then let's look, I don't want to say quickly, but there's not a lot too much going on here. Again, we're not Roman Catholics, so we're not going to get weird with Mary here, but when we see this statement in verses 25 to 27, it's what we'll call the third saying of the Savior from the cross. When Jesus is on the cross, there's a series of seven sayings that he says, recorded for us in the gospel records. The first is, Father forgive them for they do not know what they do, Luke 23, 34. The second is, assuredly I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise, Luke 23, 43. This one, third, woman behold your son, behold your mother, John 19. The fourth is, my God, my God, why have you forsaken me, Matthew 27, 46. The next is in our passage in John 19.28, I, I'm sorry, not John 19, yeah, John 19.28, I thirst. The sixth is I, it is finished, John 19.30, and then the last is Father into your hands I commit my spirit in Luke 23.46. The seven sayings of the Savior from the cross. I think just at least a handful of Reformed I'm sure Pink has a book on that. I'm sure Spurgeon has a series on that. Just type in seven sayings of the Savior from the cross and you'll probably get a lot of resources that you can investigate. Because each of these statements are packed. I mean, think about it. Wouldn't you want to know what the dying words of the Son of God on the cross are? Well, the gospel writers sure thought so because they put them in there for our investigation. But when we see Mary and these three others, there's a bit of a textual issue as whether there's three total or there's four. I think we'll side with four, or it means that Mary had a sister named Mary, and I doubt that that was the case. So I take it there are four disciples. So the first thing we ought to appreciate is the contrast. We've got four soldiers brutalizing the Savior. And then we've got four disciples standing at the foot of the Savior. And that women are mentioned has apologetic purpose. Women are mentioned at the crucifixion. Women are mentioned at the burial. And women are mentioned at the resurrection. One commentator makes this observation with that point. Precisely because women's witness was not considered dependable in Israel's courts, the canonical writers would have had male witnesses present at these crucial events if they had invented the stories. There's an apologetics to the resurrection that defies objectors, and this is one of them. If you and I set out to provide a fraud, we'd get our stories together. That's just me and you. I'll just pick on Chris or Cam. Just us, in a room, we're gonna hatch up this scenario. Multiply that when you have four. You would smooth out details, but all the details in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John aren't smoothed out. They're not contradictory. They can be harmonized, but they're not smooth. Matthew, for instance, tells us the resurrection when people saw him, some did not believe. I might just leave that out of my account, just like I might leave out David falling into adultery and covering it up with conspiracy to murder. That they mention the women shows that what they have to say is true. They're not gonna smooth it out, they're not gonna try to build it for a future court, they're not gonna try to make it in such a way that the atheists in the 21st century will be able to buy it. No, they tell the truth. There's apologetic value in these women at the cross. That's not the only reason, but I think it is an important reason. But then note the words to Mary, verse 26, that's John. John is the beloved disciple. We see references to that in John 13, 33, and again in John 21, 20. John is the beloved disciple. It doesn't mean Jesus, according to his divinity, loves people differently, or less than, or more than. But Jesus, according to his humanity, out of the 12, Peter, James, and John went with him to the Mount of Transfiguration. Peter, James, and John went with him into Gethsemane. And out of Peter, James, and John, John is called the beloved disciple. Not that he hated Peter, not that he hated James. As I mentioned before, today on social media, if you say, I really love oranges, people respond with, why do you hate apples? What? The reading comprehension is horrible. But according to his humanity, he had a special affinity with John, the beloved disciple. So at the foot of the cross, you've got Mary, you've got the other women, and you've got John, the beloved disciple. And so he addresses his mother, and he says, woman. That's not derogatory. It's not vicious. It's not unkind. I think it's master to disciple language, similar to what you have in John 2. But he says, woman, behold your son. Now in terms of this particular event, what is the significance behind it? I would suggest first we see the anguish of Mary. Wasn't this prophesied by Simeon in Luke chapter 2? Simeon makes the statement, yes, a sword will pierce through your own soul also. Imagine being at that foot of that cross, and don't imagine too much. I don't want you to see Jesus and his ruggedly handsome feet. Don't do that. Second commandment violations are a reality. But imagine this woman. I think any of us, brethren, at the foot of a cross seeing our sons or daughters crucified, even if they deserved it, even if they were the worst specimens of human beings on the face of the earth, even if they, yeah, were just vile, you'd still remember at age two when they toddled. You'd still remember throwing the ball with them in the backyard. But Jesus never did sin. Jesus wasn't vile. Jesus was holy, harmless, and undefiled. How do you think that was for Mary? Watching her son be crucified. As well, we need to understand the nature of redemption. She's not on the cross with Him vis-a-vis Rome. She's not a mediatrix helping Jesus, saving us. She's not the one who delivered Him up to the cross. He's the Father. I would suggest that very simply, it's care and concern for his mother. Fifth commandment obedience to the very end, right? Honor your father and your mother. He probably, Joseph is gone, Joseph is dead, the earthly father of our Lord Jesus, so Joseph isn't there anymore, and so he commends Mary to John, the beloved disciple. It's a beautiful thing. Fifth Commandment obedience to the very end. And again, something we see with the Savior. He's hanging on a cross. He's covered with spit. He's got blood all over him, suffering the wrath and fury of God, and he's others-minded. Mary, behold your son. And then he says to John, behold your mother. This again is the disciple whom Jesus loved. And I think very practically, John would provide care and concern and help and support for Mary. It's a pretty simple reading. But I think there might be a theological lesson as well. And I hinge this on Matthew 12, 46 to 50. Remember that scene when Jesus is surrounded by disciples? And they come to him and they say, you know, Master, your mother and your sisters and your brothers are here. What does he say to that? These are my mothers and my brothers and my sisters. Whoever does the will of my father is my mother and my brother and my sister. Could it be that Jesus is giving sort of a foreshadow as to what forges true relationships? Yeah, we're all connected in earthly families. The physical bloodlines are great. We should love our parents. We should love our spawn. We should be faithful and all those things. But in this new covenant community, mothers and sons are defined not by blood, but by grace. Mothers and sons are defined by their relationship to God through faith in Jesus Christ. Woman, behold your son. And then he says to John, behold your mother. I doubt they went to the adoption agency the next day and got the papers done so that Mary could be recognized legally as John's mother. No. The family of God, in many ways, and at least at certain times, trumps even physical relations with reference to our connection. So theologically, he is showing us something churchly. So in conclusion, I would suggest these four thoughts, and it'll be a quick four thoughts because we've covered most of it. And it's all under the head, the glorious gospel of Christ. First, the doctrine of substitutionary atonement at the cross. So if you're listening 17 or 18 minutes ago, I mentioned justification. I mentioned what that priest did in Leviticus chapter 16. I mentioned what our Lord Jesus Christ does on the cross. It's substitutionary atonement. We all know that word substitute. We grew up in schools and if our teacher was sick, we had a substitute teacher, somebody that stood in the place for Mrs. Jones, right? Jesus is the one who stood in the place for guilty sinners that deserve God's wrath and curse, both in this life and that which is to come. He's not arrested in Gethsemane. He's not hauled before Caiaphas, hauled before the Sanhedrin, hauled before Pilate, hauled before Herod, sent back to Pilate, and then taken out to skull place for his sins and for his crimes. No, it's substitutionary. God made him who knew no sin to be sin for us. He stood in our place to satisfy divine justice. Secondly, the doctrine of justification by faith alone because of the cross. I think that this scene, as we stand at the foot of the cross, as we see the Savior going to these lengths for us, I hope it helps us to understand Paul's words in Galatians 2.21. I do not set apart the grace of God or set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died in vain. In other words, if in part or in whole you can earn your favor with God, then why this scene? Why skull place? Why barbaric treatment from Roman soldiers? Why spitting upon? Why blood? Why gore? Why wrath of God if we can in part or whole earn our salvation with God? I would suggest thirdly, practically at the foot of the cross, it demonstrates what is most important. I hinted at this earlier. It's not personal fulfillment, but it's divine forgiveness. It's not earthly success, but heavenly security. It's not even happiness, but righteousness, which comes from God through faith in Jesus Christ. I think the foot of the cross, and I'm encouraging everybody to think this way, puts everything in a perspective. Where am I? What's going on in my life? Because that contrast still abides. I'm about to end. That contrast that's at the cross, it still abides. Contrast represented by the soldiers casting lots for his clothes and the disciples standing there, gazing at the Savior. You might say, well, you know, if I had been there, I doubt I would have mocked. You might not have. I doubt I would have spit. You might not have. I doubt I would have said, away with him, away with him, crucify him. Okay. But in Matthew's gospel, Jesus makes discipleship very clear cut. So does John. In Matthew 12, we read, he who is not with me is against me. So you may not have mocked. You may not have spit. You may not have said, away with him, away with him, crucify him, but if you're not looking to him in faith, guess whose side you're on? Judas, the Sanhedrin, Pilate, and the multitudes who said, away with him, away with him, crucify him. There's no third position, you know, the morally neutral. Well, they don't really have a lot of thoughts about Jesus one way or the other. Well, you're with Judas. You're with Caiaphas, you're with Annas, you're with Pilate, you're with Herod, you're with all of them. There's no third camp. There's no third position. There's no, I hope I can just sort of sneak in on my good looks and winning personality. No, no, no, no. It's either you're in Christ or you're under the wrath of God, John 3.36. So guess what the answer is? Believe on Christ. Look to Jesus in faith. Look at that one who hung four sinners on the cross, was raised again the third day, and now sits enthroned at the right hand of the Father, where he receives to himself needy sinners. Believe on him, and the Bible says, you shall be saved. Well, let us pray. Our Father in heaven, we thank you for your word. We thank you for this foot of the cross. We thank you for what happens there and for the lasting, permanent benefits that we receive by your grace and for your glory. We pray that wherever this gospel is preached today, it would run swiftly and be glorified and that you would call sinners from every tribe and tongue and people and nation and from this meeting place here to your son to believe on him for their salvation. And we ask this in Jesus' name. Amen.
