The Burial of Christ
Sermons on John
Well, please turn with me in your Bibles to John's gospel as we continue to work our way through the fourth gospel. We have seen the crucifixion of our Lord, the seven sayings of the Savior on the cross, the signs and wonders following the cross in Matthew's gospel, the confirmation of His death last week in verses 31 to 37, and this morning we come to His burial. We'll see that in verses 38 to 42. We'll also read from Matthew chapter 27. So I'll read John's text first, and then we'll turn over to Matthew 27. So John 19, beginning in verse 38. After this, Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus. And Pilate gave him permission. So he came and took the body of Jesus. And Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds. Then they took the body of Jesus and bound it in strips of linen with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury. Now, in the place where he was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden, a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid. So there they laid Jesus because of the Jews' preparation day, for the tomb was nearby. As I said, you can turn to Matthew's gospel, Matthew chapter 27, a passage that is unique to Matthew, and I will explain why later, but Matthew 27, specifically at verse 62. Matthew 27 beginning in verse 62, On the next day, which followed the day of preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees gathered together to Pilate, saying, Sir, we remember while he was still alive how that deceiver said, After three days I will rise. Therefore, command that the tomb be made secure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night and steal him away, and say to the people, he is risen from the dead. So the last deception will be worse than the first. Pilate said to them, you have a guard, go your way, make it as secure as you know how. So they went and made the tomb secure, sealing the stone and setting the guard. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our Father in heaven, we thank you for your God breathed word. We thank you that it's profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction and for instruction in righteousness. And we pray now that as we consider the life, the death, the resurrection of our Lord Jesus, we would understand that that blessed gospel of Jesus Christ, that wonderful truth that God is in Christ, reconciling the world to himself. I pray that you would effectually draw those who are dead in their trespasses and sins unto the Savior this morning, that they would see him as altogether lovely and chief among 10,000, and they would believe by your grace and for your glory. And for the saints of Christ, may you encourage and build us up and strengthen us as we consider this champion of the grave, this one who rose again the third day, this one who did all that he did for us men and for our salvation. Do forgive us now for all of our sins and unrighteousness. Cleanse us in that precious blood of the Lamb and guide us by your Holy Spirit that we may see Christ in his glory. And we ask this in Jesus' name, amen. Well, as I said, we've considered the various aspects concerning the crucifixion of our Lord. The burial is absolutely important to the entirety of the narrative. As Calvin says, the burial of Christ is now added as an intermediate transition from the ignominy of the cross to the glory of the resurrection. So the burial functions as that linchpin between His death and His resurrection from the dead. And from John's gospel this morning, I want to look first at the burial of his body in the tomb in verses 38 to 42. And then secondly, the security of his body at the tomb in that passage in Matthew's gospel in chapter 27, verses 62 to 66. We're leaning on Matthew because he gives us details and information concerning our Lord Jesus that John doesn't. Doesn't mean there's contradictions. We see the same event. looked at from the various authors who have theological reasons for why they include what they include in their narrative. But first, with reference to the burial of his body in the tomb in verses 38 to 42. Note first the request. We meet this man, Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus in verse 38, but secretly for fear of the Jews. He asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus, and Pilate gave him permission. So he came and took the body of Jesus. Now this is the first statement concerning this Joseph of Arimathea in John's Gospel. We also see him referred to in the Synoptic Gospels in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And basically he came from Arimathea but now lived in Jerusalem. He had been a secret disciple of Jesus, as our text says, for fear of the Jews. And if we ask why was he afraid of the Jews, you can turn back to John chapter 9. John chapter 9, specifically in verse 22. This is the man that was born blind that Jesus healed, and then the parents are being examined by the religious leaders, and we notice the parents' fears in 922. His parents said these things because they feared the Jews, for the Jews had already agreed that if anyone confessed, or had agreed already that if anyone confessed he was Christ, he would be put out of the synagogue. Therefore, his parents said, he is of age, Ask Him." So they were afraid, understanding all too well that the religious leaders had already threatened any sympathies toward the Lord Jesus Christ would result in immediate dismissal or exclusion from the synagogue. But closer to home, look at John chapter 12. John chapter 12, specifically at verses 42 and 43. John 12, 42, Nevertheless, even among the rulers, many believed in him. But because of the Pharisees, they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue, for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God. So coming back to our text, we see why he was fearful with reference to the Jews. According to Mark's gospel, it says that he took courage, chapter 15, verse 43, and came to Pilate to make this request. And if we ask the question, why did he have that courage? Well, we see from John's gospel that he was secret in terms of his discipleship for fear of the Jews. But once the death had occurred, he now was emboldened and he had that courage to go to Pontius Pilate and make this request to him. As well, from Mark's and Luke's gospel, we learn that he was waiting on the kingdom of God. Basically, that's theological shorthand in the New Testament for those who are anticipating the arrival of God's Messiah. That one first promised in Genesis chapter 3 at verse 15. That one typified in Genesis chapter 22. That one celebrated in the prophets and in the Psalter. They were anticipating the coming of God's Messiah and His kingdom. And this man, Joseph of Arimathea, was characterized that way. As well, he was a prominent council member. That means he was part of the Sanhedrin. And Mark's gospel tells us that in chapter 15 and verse 43. And then Luke tells us in chapter 23 at verse 51, that he did not consent to the murder of Jesus. So he was in the Sanhedrin, he was a prominent man, he was a man that rubbed shoulders with all of those elites, and yet he voiced his concern about the execution of the Lord Jesus Christ. He did not consent to that. He's trying to round out a picture of this Joseph of Arimathea. Now the contrast with the other council members is obvious. We see that in Matthew 27. They're plotting, they're planning, they're conniving, but this particular man wants to show honor and reverence to the body of our Lord Jesus Christ. It illustrates, at least by way of application of the prophet Isaiah. In Isaiah 53, because I'll just preface this citation with another observation, that he was a rich man. In fact, it was his tomb that he lays Jesus in, according to Matthew's gospel. So, with reference to his being rich, to being prominent, Isaiah the prophet had prophesied, and they made his grave with the wicked, but the rich at his death, because he had done no violence, nor was any deceit found in his mouth. So with reference to the prophet, we see even this inclusion, that this rich, prominent man buries Jesus in his particular tomb, we see the fulfillment of Isaiah 53, verse 9. He's numbered with the transgressors, but his grave is with the rich. But as well, he was concerned for the body of Jesus. That's the most basic observation that we get from John's Gospel. And R.T. Frantz says this, the bodies of those who had died by crucifixion were often not given a proper burial, but left on crosses to disintegrate or thrown on the ground to be disposed of by scavengers in natural decay. But Jewish piety objected to anyone being left unburied, Deuteronomy 21, 22, and 23. And so there was a provision there for the burial of those executed in a common burial plot rather than in a family tomb. So what this man, Joseph of Arimathea, is doing did take courage. Christ was crucified as a criminal. Christ was crucified as a transgressor. Christ was crucified under unjust condemnation by Pontius Pilate at the behest of the religious leaders. So for Joseph of Arimathea to do this, it did take courage. For him to want to show this respect to our Lord Jesus shows us something that his secret discipleship has now come right out in the open. He is no longer hesitant, he is no longer fearful, he is no longer afraid of being cast out or excluded from the synagogue. He loves Christ, he wants to honor Christ, and he's joined by this man Nicodemus. Notice in verse 39. And Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds. Now when John tells us who at first came to Jesus by night, it should cause us to reflect back to John 3. Remember Nicodemus comes at night to ask Jesus questions. Nicodemus himself is a member of the Sanhedrin. So he comes at stealth, you know, under the stealth of darkness to present questions, to basically investigate. I think he's sent by the Sanhedrin to figure out who this Jesus is. Is he legit or is he illegit? So Nicodemus engages in that discourse with Jesus. Jesus gets right to the point, unless a man is born again, he shall not enter the kingdom of heaven. Nicodemus is perplexed by this. How can a man enter into a womb again and be born? And Jesus chides him. Are you the teacher in Israel and you don't know these things? I think that what Jesus is referring to is the prophet Ezekiel in chapter 36, where he promises what we call in the New Covenant, regeneration. or the new birth. How could you be a teacher and not understand that dead sinners need a supernatural work of God's grace upon them in order for them to ever be able to come to the Lord Jesus Christ? How do you not know that, Nicodemus? But then Nicodemus arises again in John's gospel at chapter seven. And there he rebukes fellow Sanhedrin members for wanting to kill Jesus. In fact, you can look back there. So we've got Joseph of Arimathea, we've got Nicodemus, and they want to honor the body of our Lord Jesus. But notice in John's Gospel, specifically at chapter 7, in verses 50 and 51. Well, beginning in verse 45, just to get the flavor of what's happening among the religious authorities, then the officers came to the chief priests and Pharisees who said to them, why have you not brought him? The officers answered, no man ever spoke like this man. Then the Pharisees answered them, are you also deceived? Have any of the rulers of the Pharisees believed in him? These guys commit logical fallacies just as much as any of us ever drink water. Everything they say is just highly charged emotive language that has no basis in rationality or logical discourse. Listen to that. The officers bring a response with reference to why they didn't arrest Jesus and immediately they accuse him of being deceived. Are you also deceived? Well, yeah, that's the only other alternative. If I don't arrest the man you tell me to arrest, I must be deceived. And then going on, have any of the rulers of the Pharisees believed in him? It's an appeal to the populace. There's an appeal to, well, you know, nobody of any intelligence or anybody of any rank or any notoriety believes in him. Why would you believe in him? These men are pathetic. Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in him? But this crowd that does not know the law, notice, is accursed. Well, come on. I mean, this is just, again, emotional, charged language that tips their hand that they have such prejudice against the Lord Jesus Christ, they're going to act against Him, notwithstanding what anybody else may possibly say. Nicodemus sees through that. Nicodemus understands biblical law. Nicodemus appeals to Moses. Notice what he does in verse 50. Do you think Moses would side up with you guys? Do you think that Moses would pat you on the back with the manner in which you're proceeding here? Do you think you have the sanction of God's law on your side? Again, this took guts on the part of Nicodemus because he's already heard them say, Well, none of the Pharisees, none of the religious leaders have believed in Him. Notice in verse 52, Which just shows their ignorance, because Jonah did. They're ignorant of the origin of the prophet Jonah. These guys had in their crosshairs the death of our Lord Jesus. So back to the burial, back to the tomb, we see that Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus want to honor the body of our Lord. But notice what it says in verse 39, And Nicodemus, who at first came to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes. Now note, about a hundred pounds. Look back to John 12 for just a moment. John chapter 12, this anointing at Bethany by Mary. Notice in John 12 at verse one, then six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany where Lazarus was who had been dead, whom he had raised from the dead. There they made him a supper and Martha served, but Lazarus was one of those who sat at the table with him. Then Mary took, note, a pound of very costly oil of spikenard. Now the substance or the content is a bit different, spikenard versus myrrh and aloes, but if one pound was very costly, And one pound signified a commitment to our Lord in terms of the extravagance of the offering. What of a hundred pounds of myrrh and aloes given by this Nicodemus? He wants to honor and he's not cutting costs. You can't think that way when you look at Solomon's temple. The very hinges of the door were made of gold. You say, well, you know, why that waste? It's exactly what the disciples of our Lord said with reference to Mary when she crushed that spikenard over his head. Why this waste? We could give that money to the poor. What's Jesus' lesson? You've always got the poor. You don't always have me with you. There is a place for extravagance when we come to the worship of the living and the true God. See, the various ancient Near Eastern peoples all had their temples to their gods at the time of Solomon's temple. What would it have been if Solomon said, you know, we've got to cut costs, we've got to shop at the bargain depot, we've got to go to the thrift store, we've got to really keep this on a threat bear budget? All the peoples around them would have said, your God doesn't deserve a nice temple, your God doesn't deserve a nice tabernacle, your God doesn't deserve a nice tent. There is a place for extravagance within our religion. There's a place with honoring the Lord Most High. And Nicodemus didn't have a problem with that. If a pound of spikenard was very costly, what's 100 pounds of myrrh and aloes? And it's intriguing as well when the bridegroom is described in Psalm 45. I think it's a picture of our resurrected Lord. Psalm 45.8. Guess what his garments are scented with? Myrrh and aloes and cassia. This man Nicodemus along with Joseph of Arimathea want to honor the body of the Lord Jesus Christ and significantly they function as two further witnesses to the actual death of our Lord Jesus. Now in terms of the burial itself, notice in verse 40. We learn in chapter 20, verses 5 to 7, they cover the face and they cover the body. This isn't embalming, it's to make it smell good. Dead bodies have a rancid smell and the use of these particular spices and ointments and oils was to try and get rid of that stench, to try to get rid of that smell. Again, it was a way to honor. Now, the similarity with the woman in John 12, we just appealed to that. Why does she do what she's doing there? She's anointing Him for His burial. She's anointing Him for this coming burial. And now these men, in their reverence for our Lord, in their belief in our Lord, in their discipleship, consistent with being a disciple of our Lord, they honor His body. Now notice the burial itself in verses 41 and 42. Now in the place where he was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid. So there they laid Jesus because of the Jews' preparation day for the tomb was nearby. Turn back to John 18 at verse 1. John 18 verse 1, when Jesus had spoken these words, he went out with his disciples over the brook Kidron, where there was a garden, which he and his disciples entered. When we looked at that passage, I made a connection between the garden here and the Garden of Eden. You've got the first Adam in a garden setting, plunging his posterity into sin and depravity. You've got the last Adam in a garden setting, pulling his posterity out of the depths of depravity, effectually calling them unto salvation, conferring upon them life eternal, restoring them to communion and union with the living and the true God. What Adam the first forfeit, Adam the last wins by his glory and by his power. Thomas makes this observation, Christ was arrested in a garden, underwent his agony in a garden, and was buried in a garden. This indicates to us that by the power of Christ's passion we are freed from the sin which Adam committed in the Garden of Delights, and that through Christ the church is made holy, the church which itself is like a garden enclosed. I think that's a good observation. I think this garden linkage and this connection, again, it's theology. John is a theologian. He wants us to reminisce about Old Testament texts and understand their New Testament application and fruition in the coming of our Lord Jesus, that Messiah promised by the Father. And then note the tomb, verse 41b, and in the garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid. The reason why this is mentioned. We know that it was Joseph's tomb, he had purchased it, but why are we reminded or told in the gospel narratives that no one had ever laid there? Because there was no chance of mistaken identity. There was no chance that, well, you know, that's not him. No, it's a new tomb. No one's ever laid in that new tomb. Ergo, the one who was placed in there and came out is the one that was placed in there and came out. In fact, France probably says it a bit more smoothly than I do. The point is significant for apologetics in that it makes it more difficult to explain the women's discoveries due to mistaken identity. There was only one body in the tomb. So the gospel writers want to make sure that we don't, for a moment, entertain the supposition that a fast one was pulled on us. that the rug was pulled out from under us. Oh, you know, look over here while we do all this over here. It's not smoke and mirrors. The gospel narratives make sure to indicate for us the way things were and the way things happened, and in such a way that when your college professor says, well, it's not likely that this man lived and died and was raised again. But when the Muslim says, he only appeared to be crucified, God actually zapped him up into heaven. He'll come again at the Day of Judgment, do what he's supposed to do, and then die a natural death. That's Islamic theology. It's a denial of the crucifixion of our Lord. It's a denial of His death. It's a denial of His burial. And it's a denial of His resurrection. Again, the gospel writers, they speak to these things. They disavow those notions such that when people say, well, it's just a big sham and a big fraud and a big fake, why is it that eyewitnesses tell us specific details that can only be true if they were eyewitnesses of specific details? Then notice, with reference to verse 42, so there they laid Jesus because of the Jews' preparation day for the tomb was nearby. Remember, they hastened to get the body of Jesus and the other two criminals off the crosses so that they wouldn't violate the Sabbath. That was what they were doing. They wanted to get it down on the day of preparation so that they could honor the Sabbath day. I mean, it doesn't matter they just crucified the Lord of glory. They, after all, have to honor the Sabbath day. But the body was honored by Joseph and Nicodemus. The day was honored by the religious leaders, but I wanna just say something theologically before we move to Matthew. The death of the body did not affect the divinity of the only begotten Son of God. The death of the body did not affect the divinity of the only begotten Son of God. maybe a bit mysterious to us. How does the hypostatic union continue while the body's dead in the tomb? But being a bit mysterious to us doesn't nullify the truth that two natures in one person without dissolution. In fact, he assumed our humanity without ever ceasing to be divinity. John 1.1, in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1.14, the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. You cannot allow for the death of the body to dissolve the hypostatic union of our Lord Jesus Christ. He assumed our humanity without ever ceasing to be divinity, without any conversion, without any composition, without any confusion, even while the physical body lay dead in the tomb. Again, might be a bit of a mystery to us, but so is the infinite taking on the finite in order to save us from our sins. Which person, as our confession states, is very God and very man, yet one Christ, the only mediator between God and man? So the death of the body didn't dissolve the hypostatic union. The glory of the hypostatic union is that even in the death of the body, while it lay in the tomb, it is intact, it is blessed, it is wonderful, and we praise our incarnate Christ. Now turn to Matthew's gospel, Matthew chapter 27. Again, extra details from the synoptic gospels to give us a rounded picture of what happens in terms of the crucifixion. So the security of his body at the tomb. Now this is only in Matthew verses 62 to 66 and I think it's only in Matthew because only in Matthew as well is Matthew 28 verses 11 to 15. Matthew 28 verses 11 to 15 functions sort of as an anti-great commission. Remember, the Great Commission ends in verses 16 to 20 in Matthew's Gospel, where Jesus, the risen Lord Jesus, says, go therefore, make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I've commanded, or all things that I've commanded, and lo, I'm with you always, even to the end of the age. Well, the anti-Great Commission is in chapter 28, verses 11 to 15, where they bribe guards, the unbelieving Jewish leaders. They bribe the guards. with a great sum of money, tell everybody that his disciples snuck in and stole the body. So Matthew gives us these perspectives so that we'll see what the church was up against. So notice in Matthew 27, we have first the request of the religious leaders in verses 62 to 64, and then secondly, the security at the tomb. Now note first, under the request of the religious leaders, verse 62, on the next day, which followed the day of preparation. If you've been following anything I've said at all in John 19, you'll know that we're dealing now with the Sabbath, right? The day after the day of preparation for the Sabbath, ergo, is the Sabbath. Remember in John 18, 28, they didn't want to go into Pilate's palace because they didn't want to defile themselves so they could celebrate the Passover? Remember that bit in John 19 where you gotta get the bodies off the cross because tomorrow's the Sabbath and we don't wanna violate the Sabbath. Look at the hypocrisy in verse 62. On the next day, which followed the day of preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees gathered together to Pilate. I doubt Pilate came to where they were I'm not suggesting they actually went into his palace. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. How is this Sabbath keeping? How is this alleging criminal activity on the part of the disciples and continuing to slander our Lord Jesus' fastidiousness with reference to Sabbath? I dare say that probably all of us would confess we're not the best Sabbath keepers. Praise God that he sent the perfect Sabbath keeper in our Lord Jesus. But most of us probably don't consort with guys like Pilate and run down the Messiah. Because our conscience won't let us go there, right? We know better. We should, yeah, we should be better at this, keeping the Sabbath day holy. But there's some worse things that we're not gonna do. Consort with Pilate and run down the Messiah. The guys that didn't wanna go into his palace for fear that they would defile themselves and not be able to participate in the Passover. The guys who were fastidious with reference to Pilate and his guards, get those bodies off the cross, tomorrow's the Sabbath and we gotta observe it. So Matthew 27, 62 shows us something of their Sabbath observance. It's terrible. More hypocrisy, more vileness, more wretchedness. Gil says they were the inveterate and implacable enemies of Christ. Notice their motivation. So they gather together with Pilate in verse 63 saying, sir, we remember while he was still alive how that deceiver said after three days I will rise. Notice what they admit that Islam is wrong. that the swoon theory is wrong, that an attempt to fake the death of the Lord Jesus is wrong, that they say when he was still alive. So if Joseph and Nicodemus function as two additional witnesses to the death of our Lord Jesus, so does the Sanhedrin, the entirety of that religious council. But we know that while he was still alive, which means, again, I'm not a rocket scientist, but I would conclude that means he's presently dead. And they admit that, and they understand that. They want to fasten a guard at his tomb. They confirm his death. They continue to slander him, verse 63. Sir, we remember while he was still alive how that deceiver said. Where did he deceive? See, this is the kind of stuff you meet with when people oppose Christianity because they're too smart. Oh, the Bible's filled with lies. It's filled with contradictions. Hand them the Bible and say, show me one. We always play these pathetic little, eh, well, yeah, we gotta kowtow to the culture around us. Why? The earth is Yahweh's in the fullness thereof. Why are we kowtowing? Why are we afraid to bow our heads in Tim Hortons? Why are we afraid to look like the people of God in this present evil age? When somebody says it's deception, okay, show me instances of it. Show me the contradictions. Well, you know, that's what I heard at my college from my godless atheistic professor. Oh, well, he's the authority, so I guess we should all just bow down. Look at these men. When did Jesus deceive? We know the answer to that. He was wholly harmless and undefiled. He never deceived. There was no guile in his mouth. And they just assumed this with Pilate. We remember how when he was alive, that deceiver said, in three days I will be raised again. Look at the text. So we remember while he was still alive, how that deceiver said, after three days I will rise. Now we might ask the question, how did they know that? Well, we've seen in John's gospel a few times where Jesus has talked about being raised. In Matthew's gospel, they could have heard it from Judas. They had truck with Judas. Remember Judas, for 30 pieces of silver, sold out the Lord of glory. Who'd he sell them out to? Well, the Sanhedrin. I don't think it's fanciful to think that Judas said, you know, he said in Matthew 16, he wouldn't have said it like this, but go with me. He said it in Matthew 17 and he said it in Matthew 20 that he was going to die but he was going to raise again. They could have known his meaning in John 2.19, destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up. John the evangelist or theologian tells us he was talking about the temple of his body They could understand the prophecy or the reference by our Lord with reference to Jonah. Just as Jonah was three days in the belly of the whale, so will be the Son of Man. Well, what happened after the three days in the belly of the whale for Jonah? He was vomited out on the shore. What does that mean? It means the ground is going to vomit out our Lord Jesus. Not precisely, but Jesus will rise again. So they just assume this is deception on the part of the Lord. This is what motivates them. They know that Jesus is a liar, and therefore they present their request according to verse 64. Therefore, command that the tomb be made secure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night and steal him away and say to the people, he is risen from the dead. So the last deception will be worse than the first. So they want extra security. They want a guard. They want some fortification. They want to make sure that these mangy disciples don't come at night and steal away the body of our Lord. Again, on the surface of it, it is absurd. Where are Jesus' disciples according to Matthew 26, 56? Hanging in the bushes, waiting for Him to go in the tomb so they can stealthily go by night and steal His body and fake it? They all fled from Him. They forsook him and fled. Do you think, guys, and I'm not speaking ill of the apostles, we probably all would have done the exact same thing. Do you think that men who flee and forsake somebody at crucifixion, because they don't wanna be seen present, are the kinds of men, I mean, they were fishermen, One was a tax collector. These weren't bravado ninjas that had the stealthy arts of nighttime penetrations and stealing bodies out of tombs. It's just patently false. It is such an impugning of a wicked motive on the people of God themselves. Lest his disciples come by night and steal him away. What's their fear? Their fear is an empty tomb. Their fear is the thought that there ain't gonna be a Jesus in that tomb in three days. Listen to Frantz. He says, the authorities' fears focus explicitly at least, not on the possibility that Jesus might actually rise from death, but on the opportunity for the disciples to cash in on such language to fake a resurrection, an explanation which they will continue to uphold even after the event. A Messiah allegedly returned to life after being officially executed for blasphemy will, they rightly perceive, be far more dangerous to their religious authority than Jesus had been while alive. So basically what he's saying, they have a vested interest in no Jesus leaving that tomb. If Jesus is out of that tomb, then we got huge problems. I'm speaking as the Sanhedrin here. I know for us, Jesus leaving that tomb means not huge problems, but huge blessings. Because God delivered him up because of our offenses. And he was raised for what? Our justification. But you see these unbelieving Jews. Jesus had said, I'm going to die, but I'm going to be raised. I'm going to die, but I'm going to be raised. I'm going to die, but I'm going to be raised. So what do they do? We've got to post guards, make sure these pesky disciples don't come in and steal that body. But it's interesting, in verse 15 of chapter 28, the soldiers had come and told the chief priests, the religious leaders, about these things. What things? The resurrection of our Lord. So then they go to that plan and they bribe the guards to say that his disciples came and stole the body. Sorry, you can't have it both ways. You can't protect it with a large stone and a seal and then claim that his disciples came and stole the body. Do you see how patently absurd unbelief is? Rejecting the biblical narrative, rejecting the truth as it is in Jesus, does not yield rationality. It does not yield the ability to argue from premises to conclusions well. Remember Paul before Fastus? What was the accusation? Paul, much learning is driving you mad. What's Paul's retort? Well, I better go back to university and learn from the God-hating secularists how I ought to think. I am not mad, most noble Fastus, but I speak the words of truth and reason. Brethren, it's not madness to embrace the truth as it is in Jesus. Remember that man, that demoniac who lived amongst the tombs? After his dealings with Jesus, where do we find him? Clothed and in his right mind, sitting with Jesus. We are not to fear the godless, atheistic, secularistic, or even agnostic sort of attempts to upbraid our religion. God most high, Lord God of truth, Psalm 31. Jesus Christ, truth incarnate. The Holy Spirit, the spirit of truth. Yet not three truths, one truth. In this divine and infinite being, there are three subsistences. You see what motivates that? There better be a body in that tomb in three days. That's all we're saying. But then notice their argument in verse 64 again. So the last deception will be worse than the first. What's the first in their minds? Well, that Jesus claimed to be the Messiah. And if Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, which we know is patently false, it was a deception, an empty tomb with the body having been stolen by the disciples will be a last and greater deception even of that first messianic claim. Davies and Allison make an interesting observation. They say the first being, the first deception, being Jesus teaching that He was the Messiah. The last being that He was raised from the dead. The irony is that this proverb applies to them. Their last deception, denying the resurrection in the face of overwhelming facts, is worse than their first, rejecting Jesus and teaching others to reject Him also. And then notice, Pilate complies, Pilate says, okay, according to verse 65, Pilate said to them, you have a guard, go your way, make it as secure as you know how. So they went and made the tomb secure, sealing the stone and setting the guard. Now, this sealing of a large stone, It wasn't, you know, I remember being camping or hunting out with some brothers one time, we saw a big rock in the roadway. Hey, I bet we could move that. Yeah, sure. I wouldn't even characterize it as a large stone. It was a big enough stone to best two or three of us. Do you see what the gospel narratives are doing? When that tomb is open and that Savior has arisen, That is God's confirmation that He is the man. If you do not believe in Him, you will perish in your sins forever. Not only do they have a large stone, they also seal it. Remember Daniel in the lion's den. Others call it, I think better, Daniel in the angel's den. Then a stone was brought and laid on the mouth of the den, and the king sealed it with the signets of his lords, that the purpose concerning Daniel might not be changed. They sealed the stone, they set the guard. How does this happen? How? Does Jesus rise? Frantz says, the sealing of the tomb and the placing of an armed guard, mentioned only by Matthew, add to the dramatic triumph of Jesus' resurrection despite every human precaution. Chrysostom said, behold, both a seal, a stone, and a watch, and they were not able to hold him. Matthew Henry, to guard the sepulcher against the poor, weak disciples was folly because needless. But to think to guard it against the power of God was folly because fruitless and to no purpose. So these men did everything in their power to try to disavow every subsequent person of the notion that Jesus rose from the dead. They wanted to prevent the stealing of his body because they just assumed that he wasn't gonna be raised from the dead because they just assumed that he was a deceiver about his messianic identity. When it turns out the tomb is empty, what do they do in 28, 11, and 15? Well, we gotta go into plan B here. Guards, here's a big chunk of money. Keep your mouth shut." With reference to him being raised from the dead. Go ahead and tell him that his disciples stole him. Notice in 2815. Notice the traction this story got. 2815. So they took the money and did as they were instructed. about telling people that his disciples stole him away. And this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day. Of course it got traction. Of course it ran swiftly. Of course people received it. People still receive it. Ah, he didn't really, you know, die and raise again. It's just a fable. It's a story. It's myth. It's designed to teach us something. I think more offensive than the God-hating atheists, well, they're pretty offensive. But it's those Christians who deny, professing Christians, that deny the supernatural truth that we find in scripture. In the early part of the 20th century, there was a movement called neo-orthodoxy, or liberal Christianity. We think of liberal and it associates with us, you know, weird people, screaming political things, and all that. But basically, theological liberalism is kind of akin to the Sadducees. Remember the Sadducees? They deny the resurrection. They deny the existence of spirit or angel. What does that mean? It means they're naturalists, they're humanists, they're materialists. They have no view of or consciousness of the supernatural. So in the 20th century, the first part of the 20th century, this neo-orthodoxy or liberalism was quite the rage. And you might hear things like, well, it really doesn't matter if Jesus rose from the dead. What matters is the effect it has upon us. But that has survived and entered into the 21st century and is espoused by people that you and I might listen to for politics or religion. It really doesn't matter whether he rose from the dead or he was crucified in some substitutionary, curse-bearing sort of way. What matters is the effect of the story upon us. No, what matters is the empty tomb. What matters is the bloody cross. What matters is the mission of the Son of God to come and to save us from our sins. What matters for Paul is that he was delivered up because of our offenses and was raised for our justification. Brethren, the historicity of the gospel narratives is absolutely crucial, and we confess them happily. Well, just a couple of thoughts in conclusion. First, the folly of the religious leaders. Notice again in Matthew 27, 62. Typically, even the worst Sabbath keeper in this new covenant situation doesn't consort with enemies and refer to the Messiah as a deceiver. That's bad. They impugn the character of the disciples. So another thing, I mean, we're probably not the best at being Christians, but typically people don't impugn us as grave robbers. You know, I got a hunch about you. You're gonna break in there and steal that dead body. What? Like, hadn't even entered my mind. They impugn these men. He's disciples of our Lord. Why? Because they were disciples of our Lord. See, I think there's a present abiding truth here. If they impugned Jesus and his disciples, they're probably gonna still impugn us. Just spitballing here, just guessing that might actually be the case in light of 2 Timothy 3, 12. But Psalm 76 makes this statement. Surely the wrath of man shall praise you. Surely the wrath of man shall praise you. It's an interesting, curious statement. I think people go, what does that mean? Surely the wrath of man shall praise you. I think it's illustrated here. They're taking pains to deny the historicity of the resurrection. That's wrath. But what is it actually doing? It's strengthening. it is confirming and affirming even more the historicity of the resurrection. Ryle says, they were actually making it impossible to prove that there was any deception or imposition. Their seal, their guard, their precautions were all to become witnesses in a few hours that Christ had risen. They might as well have tried to stop the tides of the sea or to prevent the sun rising as to prevent Jesus coming forth from the tomb. They were taken in their own craftiness. Their own devices became instruments to show forth God's glory. Even the wrath of man shall praise you. Everything about them was horrific, but even their wrath brings glory to God most high. I would suggest as well a lesson that we can learn from this is the faithfulness of the disciples of Jesus in Joseph of Arimathea and as well in Nicodemus. You say, well, you know, he was a secret disciple. He feared man. Yeah. Have you ever reflected on you? Have you ever reflected on me? That'll keep you busy for a few hours. Who of us are the Elijah likes standing out on Mount Carmel, calling the people to repentance? Yeah, they were secret. but they came forth. Spurgeon says, Joseph and Nicodemus are types of many more who have been emboldened by the cross of Christ to do what, without that mighty magnet, they would never have attempted. When night comes, the stars appear. So in the night of Christ's death, these two bright stars shone forth with blessed radiance. Some flowers bloom only at night. Such a blossom was the courage of Joseph and Nicodemus. And that's not an excuse for indolence. That's not an excuse for continued fearfulness. That's not an excuse to embrace the secretness of your religion. But there is an encouragement there. Not all the servants of the Most High are Elijah. What does Obed do? He hides prophets. He keeps them alive. Without the pomp and show of Carmel, without the pomp and show of fire dropping down on the sacrifice of the Baal worshipers, Obed secretly secrets away the prophets of God from death at the hands of Ahab and Jezebel. We don't upbraid him. We don't say he's terrible. How dare him? God made some to be Elijah's. God made some to be Joseph's. God made some to be Nicodemus's, or Nicodemoi, if that's the plural form. And then I would suggest, thirdly and finally, the theological emphasis on the burial. The theological emphasis, what theology do we drive? Well, probably expected this, true humanity. It's true of humanity to die, right? If he didn't die, there would be question as to the incarnation. If he didn't die, then somebody would scratch their heads and say, well, you know, that doesn't make sense because every single person died. I know there's the exceptions. Enoch walked with God and then he was not. Elijah got caught up in the whirlwind and taken to heaven. I get that. The general rule, ordinary providence is that human beings die. the true humanity of our Lord. That tomb expresses that realistically. The Geneva Bible says, so that by his burial no man can justly doubt either his death or resurrection. That tomb confirms his humanity. That tomb confirms his death as a real human being. Secondly, the last part of his humiliation was attained. The state of humiliation, he assumes our humanity, he lives, he sorrows, he suffers, he dies. Genesis 3.19, for dust you are and to dust you shall return. Jesus experienced that. Thirdly, the demonstration of his triumph over death. The demonstration of his triumph over death. Our confession says on the third day he rose from the dead with the same body in which he suffered. I would suggest fourthly in terms of theological emphasis, you can turn to 1 Corinthians 15, we'll end here. 1 Corinthians 15, two observations. The removal of the fear of the grave for his people. Notice in 1 Corinthians chapter 15 at verses 54 and 55. So when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your sting? O Hades, where is your victory? He has removed the fear of the grave Not the fear of the process. I'm afraid of getting shot in the head, brethren. I'm afraid of getting ran over by a Mack truck. I mean, not fearfully to the point where I don't get out of bed, but if you ask me, do you want to get a shot in the head? No, I'm kind of afraid of that. It's not the fear of the process. I think that's natural to human beings. Jesus, if it is possible, let this cut pass from me. Even so, Father, not my will, but thine be done. True humanity doesn't welcome, you know, horrible death. but he has defanged the grave. He has taken the victory out of the grave. He's given us peace and life, and that ends on this, the confirmation of the hope of the resurrection for his people. Ursinus says, Christ, our head, has opened up the way for us from the grave to the glory. And if you look at 1 Corinthians 15, verses one to four, moreover, brethren, I declare to you, the gospel which I preach to you, which also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preach to you, unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you, first of all, that which I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the Twelve. It's this gospel that sinners must believe in order to be saved. You hear people talk about the gospel somewhat as a feeling or as an experience. No, it is a Christ-centered message. The gospel is rooted in history. comes from eternity. God the Son assumes our humanity, lives for us, dies for us, and is raised again for us. That's history. That's truth. That's reality. Doctrine is for our sins. The Lord Jesus Christ provides to needy sinners all that they stand in need of in terms of forgiveness and in terms of a righteousness by which they can be clothed and enter into the presence of God. And if that wets the appetite, come back tonight, Philippians 3, 8, and 9. The apostle explains justification by faith alone. in Christ alone and what benefits accrue to the people of God based on that finished work of the Lord Jesus. From the cradle to the cross, through the tomb to his position in glory, Christ says, come and you will be saved. Well, let us pray. Our Father in Heaven, we thank You for Your Word. We thank You for this reality that our Lord Jesus Christ lived for us, He died for us, buried in a tomb for us, and was raised again the third day. And we do look forward to His return again in glory to judge the living and the dead. We pray for the blessing of God upon the preaching of the gospel of God throughout this earth, that you would save from every tribe, every tongue, every people, and every nation, and that you would be glorified in this. And God, strengthen and encourage us with the reality that our beloved Savior overcame death, he overcame the grave, and that he has paved the way for us to eternal glory. And we ask this through Jesus Christ, our Lord, amen.
