← Back to sermon library
We'll turn with me in your Bibles
to John chapter 1. John's Gospel chapter 1. I'll begin reading in verse 1.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God. He was in the beginning with
God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing
was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life
was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness,
and the darkness did not comprehend it. There was a man sent from
God, whose name was John. This man came for a witness,
to bear witness of the light that all through him might believe.
He was not that light, but was sent to bear witness of that
light. That was the true light, which
gives light to every man coming into the world. He was in the
world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did
not know Him. He came to His own, and His own
did not receive Him. But as many as received Him,
to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those
who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood, nor
of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word became flesh and
dwelt among us. And we beheld His glory, the
glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace
and truth. John bore witness of Him and
cried out, saying, This was He of whom I said, He who comes
after me is preferred before me, for He was before me. And
of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace. For the
law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through
Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is
in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him. Amen. Well, let us pray. Our Father,
we thank You for this, Your Word, and we pray now for the ministry
of Your Spirit. We acknowledge our debt to You,
Lord God, that You have saved us by grace alone, through faith
alone and Christ alone. Truly our hearts rejoice as we
see Christ set forth in this prologue to John's Gospel. I
pray that it would encourage us to worship and encourage us
to adore and to praise and to glorify the triune God of heaven
and earth. I pray, Father, for those who've
come here this morning outside of Christ. We pray that today
would be the day of salvation. We pray that by Your Spirit,
by Your Word, You would bring forth sinners in the exercise
of Your will. Call them out of darkness into
marvelous light, that they may proclaim Your excellence. We
also pray that You would forgive us now for all of our sin and
transgression. Your holiness reminds us of our
unholiness. Your glory and Your majesty reminds
us of our waywardness. And we pray and we confess our
sins to You. We plead the merit and the mercy
of our Lord Jesus Christ. We pray that You would wash us
afresh in His precious blood. We rejoice that we live in those
days prophesied by Zechariah, that there is a fountain open
for sin and uncleanness. We just pray as well for other
churches gathered together today. We pray that Your Word would
run swiftly and be glorified, that a multitude would turn from
their idols to the true and living God, and would know the joy of
being found in Christ Jesus. And it's in His most blessed
name that we pray. Amen. Well, the prologue to the
gospel, according to John, does set forth the Lord Jesus in His
glory. It truly is an amazing passage
of Holy Scripture. And our focus this morning will
be on verse 14, the Word became flesh. And we'll look at that
verse under two considerations. First, the incarnation of the
Word, and secondly, the glory of the Word. So that is where
we hope to go this morning. But just a few preliminary observations. If you notice, in verse 1 in
chapter 1, It identifies the Word. In the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Truly,
an amazing statement concerning the identity of this One that
John says became flesh. He is identified as the Word
here in verse 1, and again in verse 14, and in 1 John 1.1,
and then in Revelation 19.13. So John the Apostle, writing
of Christ, uses this particular identifier to apply to the Lord
of Glory Himself. And as I said, there is glorious
movement in this passage. The attentive reader will notice
the similarities between John 1-1 and Genesis 1-1. Genesis begins the same as John
1-1, in the beginning God. Here in John 1-1, in the beginning
was the Word. John's prologue, in the language
of B.B. Warfield, traces the whole history
of the recreation of a dead world into newness of life. Genesis
1-1 highlights the creation of the world. John 1-1 highlights
the recreation of that dead world in and through the work of our
Lord Jesus Christ. So, blessed thoughts, blessed
ideas. Let's look specifically now at
the incarnation of the Word. The word incarnation simply means,
in the flesh. It simply means, in flesh meant. And when we come to verse 14,
the Apostle tells us, the Word became flesh. Again, this harkens
back to John 1, this eternal one. In the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This same
word, according to verses 2 and following, created all things. He's the agent of creation, according
to John the Apostle. John tells us that in him, verse
4, was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light
shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Verse 10 tells us, or highlights the reality, that he was in the
world. And so again, if you're reading
John 1, 1, and you see this one identified as God, and then you
come to verse 10, and you hear that He was in the world, certainly
the question arises, well, how could such be the case? How does
it happen that the Eternal God, how does it happen that this
One that was with God, and who is God, is now in the world in
His own, do not receive Him? Well, that's what John 1.14 describes
for us. It tells us how the eternal Word
of God comes to dwell among men. And the Apostle says, the Word
became flesh. Now, it's an interesting use
of language that's employed here. I really want you to get this
sermon this morning. There's a lot of stuff going
on in verse 14 that is currently under attack in evangelical and
in Reformed circles. We need to have a sound Christology. We need to understand the person
and the work of Christ. We need to know these things.
Jesus says later in John's Gospel, if you do not believe that I
am, you will die in your sins. Now, we are and can be wrong
about a lot when it comes to Christianity. You ask five people
about the end times, you're probably going to get five different responses. You ask five people about church
government, and you're probably going to get five answers concerning
church government. You ask five people about baptism,
you're probably going to get about 25 different responses
on baptism. But you see, when Jesus says,
if you do not believe that I am, you will die in your sins, that
highlights this reality. That what we think concerning
the Lord Jesus Christ, and what we believe concerning the Lord
Jesus Christ, is everything. When Jesus says to His disciples
in Matthew's Gospel, who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am? They give a few responses about
what's going on in the world around them. And then Jesus hones
in upon them specifically. And He says, who do you say that
I am? And, of course, Simon Peter jumps
to the occasion and he says, You are the Christ, the Son of
the living God. And then, of course, the Lord
responds, Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood
did not reveal this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. That
was the correct response. That's the right answer. You
need to be crystal clear with reference to the person and the
word of the Lord Jesus Christ. Note the language in verse 1.
He says, in the beginning was the Word. The verb that is employed
there means continuous action in the past. If you go back to
the beginning, there was the Word. He's always been. He is eternal. He, like His Father,
does not have a beginning. Arius was wrong. Arianism is
wrong. And by that I don't mean neo-Nazis
with swastikas. Arius was a man who denied the
deity of our Lord Jesus Christ. He said there was a time when
the Son was not. That's heresy. It is blasphemy. It is wretched. It is a denial
of the person of our Lord Jesus Christ. Note the grammar. In the beginning was the Word. Now see or compare alongside
of that verse 14. The Word became flesh. This happens in history. This
happens in time. This is a particular event. One
brother, a dear brother of mine, says that Jesus became what He
was not, flesh, though ever remaining what He always was and ever shall
be. So this Word that was in the
beginning, this Word that was God, in time, in space, in history,
comes in the flesh. And while flesh can mean that
which is dark and sinful and has a tendency to what is evil,
flesh here simply means He came as a man. He came as a human
being. He came as a person with both
body and soul. All that is true of humanity
was true of this One who became flesh. We have a unique person
set forth before us here in John's prologue. It truly is sublime,
it is wondrous, it is glorious to behold this One that was God
has come in time and in space. Truly, when we sing, veiled in
flesh, the Godhead seed, hail the incarnate deity, pleased
as man, with men to dwell, Jesus our Emmanuel, that rightly reflects
John's prologue. It rightly gets at what the truth
is set before us here in this particular passage. Interestingly
enough, Pastor Cam read a parallel passage to what we find here
in verse 14. If I were to ask you, what did
Pastor Cam read in worship this morning? I hope you'd all say
2 Corinthians 8. I hope we're not that forgetful
that quick. But the apostle does a similar
thing. The verb is a bit different,
but the concept and the idea is the same in 2 Corinthians
8. He says, for you know the grace
of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, Though He
is God, though He possesses all things by virtue of the fact
that He created them and that He sustains them, that though
He was rich, the Apostle says, yet for your sakes, He became
poor. You see, He became what He was
not, though ever remaining what He always was and ever shall
be. And the Apostle says the end
result of this is that you, through His poverty, might become rich. It's a similar convention. It's a similar construction.
The reality is this. the eternal God, the Lord Jesus
Christ, in time, in space, in history, according to the language
of the Apostle in Galatians 4.4, in the fullness of the time,
God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law,
to redeem those who were under the law. It is an amazing reality
that we witness as we come to the prologue of John's Gospel. And the fact that the Apostle
here uses the word flesh, Now again, it's not with a sinful
connotation, but the flesh itself would rub against the grain of
a Greek audience. Flesh was that which isn't good.
It is inferior. Well, flesh in and of itself
is right. God made flesh. God made man. God's war is not against nature
or creation. It's against sin and rebellion
and chaos and distortion. So John tells us the Word became
flesh. The other authors, Matthew and
Luke specifically, tell us how this came to pass. It was through
the human efforts, the human vessels rather, of Joseph and
Mary. They take pains to link Jesus
and his genealogy with both Abraham and David according to Matthew's
gospel. And then what does Luke do but
trace it all the way back to Adam himself? There is a theology
in Matthew. There is a theology in Luke that
this one, born of a woman, is the son of David. He is the son
of Abraham. He is the son of promise. He
will execute the plan and purpose of his father. He is true Israel
according to Matthew. And then in Luke's gospel, we
have, he is the second or the last Adam. The first Adam fails,
the second Adam, the Lord Jesus Christ, succeeds. So they flesh
out for us this enfleshment of the Son of God via Mary. Under the power of the Holy Spirit,
she conceived and bore this baby forth. The Word became flesh. The Old Testament prophesied
concerning this. Remember Genesis 3.15, that proto-gospel. Who would it be that would crush
the serpent? It'd be the seed of a woman. When the prophets
Micah and Isaiah come to announce victory for Israel, they trace
it back to a manger in Bethlehem, Ephrathah. Just like King David
was born in that place, so would his greater Son be born in that
place. The Old Testament Scriptures
prophesied and testified of a suffering servant, of a man of sorrows,
and of one acquainted with grief, such that when the fullness of
the time comes upon us and Christ is born, we ought not to be surprised
that He is man. Those same scriptures, those
Old Testament scriptures pointed to His deity as well. Yahweh
said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies
your footstool. Psalm 45, your throne of God
is forever. All these apply to the Lord Jesus
Christ. What we have take place over
2,000 years ago, in that manger, in that place, is absolutely
positive fulfillment of God's prophetic Word. It is to fulfill
His promises, to save His people from their sins. So that's the
statement. That's what incarnation literally
means. The Word became flesh. Now let's look secondly at the
glory of the Word. He says He dwelt among us. The
presence of God is with us, is what He's saying. The language
used here. This dwelt among us is the word
tabernacled among us. And I think for a specific reason. If you're an old covenant Jew
and you thought tabernacle, what would you immediately think?
Presence of God. If you were an old covenant Jew
and you thought temple, what would be the reality? Presence
of God. In fact, you can turn back to
Exodus 25 for just a moment. Exodus chapter 25, specifically
at verse 8. I want you to see what John is
doing here in his presentation of the Word who became flesh.
He tells us that he dwelt among us. Much of what John is saying
here assumes or presupposes or has in the background these old
covenant themes, these old covenant concepts and ideas. When John
will say, for the law came through Moses, but grace and truth came
through our Lord Jesus, that doesn't mean there was no grace
and truth under Moses. That doesn't mean there's no
law under Jesus. He's speaking covenant. He's
speaking the language of epoch. He's speaking of the in-breaking
of God's promise and fulfillment in and through the person of
our Lord Jesus. The law, the old covenant, came
through Moses. The new covenant comes through
our Lord Jesus Christ, and he uses and he employs this language
and imagery of old covenant religion, and he fleshes it out, pardon
the pun, and shows how it applies in the new covenant church. Exodus
25, 8. Let them make me a sanctuary
that I may dwell among them. That's what Exodus is about. Do you know that the bulk of
Exodus is about God's dwelling? We think of deliverance, and
we should, the Exodus. We think of demand, and we should,
Sinai. But we oftentimes neglect dwelling. Why does God deliver? Why does
God demand? But so that God can dwell with
His people. 25 to 40 specifies the construction
of the tabernacle. What's important to the Lord
according to Exodus, the book of Exodus? Yes, deliverance.
Yes, demand. But so is dwelling. So is worship. So is the body of Christ coming
together. This gives us an understanding
to Psalm 87. The Lord loves the gates of Zion
more than all the dwellings of Jacob. There is something unique
and something special and something glorious when God's people, covenanted
together, meet with their Redeemer King. And here specifically he
says, according to all that I show you, that is the pattern of the
tabernacle and the pattern of all its furnishings, just so
you shall make it. And then dropping down to verse
21, you shall put the mercy seat on top of the ark, and in the
ark you shall put the testimony that I will give you, and there
I will meet with you. You ever stop and ponder that? It just becomes old hat, doesn't
it? We just read that and we don't stop. I, the living and
true God, I, the creator of all things, I, the illuminator of
all things, I, the one who sustains all things, will meet with you
in that tent that is put up by your hands." John is saying this in his prologue. We beheld his glory. What happens when the tabernacle
is constructed? What happens when the temple
is constructed? Perhaps you've heard that Hebrew
word before, Shekinah. When the people of God assemble
together in the place of God's own choosing, and God comes to
meet with them, it is, as the biblical authors testify, His
Shekinah glory dwelling among them. John is saying this. He dwelt among us, just like
the tabernacle was the meeting place of God, just like the temple
was the meeting place of God. When you see this Word who became
flesh, what do you behold but the meeting place of God? He
says in verse 21, you shall put the mercy seat on top of the
ark, and in the ark you shall put the testimony that I will
give you. And there I will meet with you, and I will speak with
you from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim
which are on the ark of the testimony about everything which I will
give you in commandment to the children of Israel. It's a beautiful
statement in the prophet Ezekiel. You can turn to Ezekiel chapter
11, specifically in verse 16. Do you remember the situation
in Ezekiel? The people of God, the covenant
community, the people of Judah, are in exile. Their city's been
destroyed, their temple's been destroyed, and as a result there's
discouragement in the hearts of the people. The faithful people,
the remnant people, the believing people. Certainly there were
those who couldn't care one whit. All they were concerned about
was their three hots and a cot. But for the faithful people of
God Most High, they were curious. With our temple gone, does that
mean our God is gone? Enter the prophet Ezekiel. We
see God's chariot. We see His battle throne on wheels. That is to testify and tell us
something. That He's not presently located
in Jerusalem. Wherever God's people are, He
will roll that battle chariot there and be in their midst.
And that's what he says in Ezekiel 11, 16. Therefore say, thus says
the Lord God, although I have cast them far off among the Gentiles,
and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet
I shall be a little sanctuary for them. I shall be a little
holy place for them in the countries where they have gone. The absence
of the temple does not mean the absence of your God. John's employing
this language of He dwelt among us. He tabernacled among us. He was in our midst. The word
means to live in a tent, to settle. The flesh of Christ is the new
localized presence of God on the earth. Jesus is the fulfillment
for which the temple and the tabernacle stood. This One who
was with God, this One who is God, has come and tabernacled
among us. He in the flesh, when you behold
Him, you behold all the glory of God. John 1.18, he says that,
right? No one has seen God at any time.
But the only Son, the one who resides in His bosom, He has
exegeted. He has declared Him. There's
that interesting spot in John's Gospel in the upper room discourse,
when Philip says, show us the Father. What is Jesus' response? Have I been with you this long
and you still don't understand? If you have seen me, you've seen
the Father. The apostle is setting before
you the glory of Christ. He is God. Veiled in flesh, the
Godhead see. Hail the incarnate deity. Pleased as man with men to dwell,
Jesus our Emmanuel. To use the language of John Calvin,
the Son of God became the Son of Man so that the sons of men
could become the sons of God. Christ became flesh, He dwelt
among us, and now notice what He goes on to say, and we beheld
His glory. The primary emphasis, I think,
in all of this is on revelation. It is the fact that God has sent
His Son, and through His Son, He is revealing Himself forever. In other words, the New Covenant,
the Scriptures, Christ and his apostles, Jesus comes as revealer. That's not the only reason, and
we'll investigate a few other things along the way. But what
he says, we beheld his glory. Again, the idea there is the
Shekinah, the tabernacle, the temple. Remember that instance
in Leviticus chapter 10? We often think about Nadab and
Abihu dying before the presence of the Lord for offering strange
fire to Him. And we should think about that.
We ought to be very careful about the way we approach this living
and true God. We don't wander into His presence and just say,
hey you, bless me. We don't offer a profane fire
to the Lord the way that Nadab and Abihu did. For chapters 1
to 9, they were told in explicit detail what to offer before Yahweh. Chapter 10, they get a bee in
their bonnet, they throw a little strange fire in their censers,
they present it unto the Lord, the Lord sends fire down, not
to consume their offering, but to consume them. You see, just
prior to that, in Leviticus 9, they offer a legitimate sacrifice. And it says that fire comes down
from the presence of the Lord and consumes the sacrifice, and
the people shout! That's the glory cloud! That's
the Shekinah! That's the presence of God! This
is why in the prophet Haggai, the old timers were wiping tears
from their face, because the second temple lost something
of the beauty and the grandeur and the majesty of Solomon's
temple. The old timers were saying, it's
not the same, it's different, it lacks the glory. John is saying,
we beheld his glory. And I know that some of the translations
use C. The idea of beheld speaks better. I see people on a given day,
and this is going to sound terrible, but I behold the majesty of God
in the creation. I know that sounds terrible.
I behold my wife. I see lots of people during the
day, but I behold her. The word could go both ways,
beheld or see. It's a good call to translate
it as behold. We beheld His glory. We witnessed
it. We saw it. We verified it. We confirmed it. We affirmed
it. We worshipped as a result of
it. When Christ does His signs and
wonders, what is it but to behold His glory? When Christ raises
Lazarus from the dead in John chapter 11, what is it but to
behold His glory? What is it when we beheld His
glory when He went to the cross on our behalf? What is it when
we saw that empty tomb, but to behold His glory? He dwelt among
us and we saw with our own eyes the glorious things that He had
done. Even though the Word becomes
flesh, He never ceases to be what He was. He never ceases
to be what He'll always be. Very God of very God. Now, notice
what John says. Verse 14. The Word became flesh
and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory. And then he specifies
in two ways specifically, we saw His glory. We beheld His
glory, one, as of the only begotten of the Father, and two, full
of grace and truth. Now, it could be a bit subordinate,
but I'm going to take them as coordinate thoughts. John says,
we beheld His glory, first of all, as of the only begotten
of the Father. It's a powerful statement. This
is where I suggested or where I said earlier that many today,
evangelicals and Reformed, are messing with the truth of God's
Holy Word that we ought not to mess with. Your Bibles probably
translate, or some of your Bibles translate, unique or only son. And that's legit. That's what
the word means. And as a result, some have suggested
that because it's not only begotten, we must reject this concept of
what's called the eternal generation of the son. Though this particular verse
may not substantiate the doctrine on its own, it's certainly useful
in the argument. We are not to jettison the reality
of the eternal generation of the Son. And what do I mean by
that? The Confession of Faith deals
with it, the Nicene Creed deals with it, which I'll quote in
just a moment. The idea of eternal generation
simply exists to highlight the differentiation between the Father
and the Son. Sometimes people hear this idea
of eternal generation, which it's modified by eternal. I don't
know how we can mess that up. But we hear about generation
or begotten. And we think, well, as human
beings, when we beget a child, that means that child has a beginning. And then we reason from the creature
to the creator. May I suggest that's a very faulty
way of argument. We are not to reason from us
to God. This happens with things like
God's suffering, and God weeping, and God dying, and all those
sorts of things. We reason from ourselves to God
when the Scripture doesn't do that. The Scripture presents
God as Holy Other, as transcendent, as all-powerful, all-glorious,
sovereign in His majesty. But the idea of eternal generation
is there to highlight the differences between the Father and the Son.
We see that in John 1.1. In the beginning was the Word.
The Word was with God. There's distinction between the
persons. There is a Father, there is a
Son. But in their essential unity,
the Word was God. You see, the Bible teaches that
there is one God in three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And the idea of eternal generation
is there to show us something of the relationship between the
Father and the Son. The generation, or the spiration,
or the procession, rather, of the Spirit shows us the differentiation
between Father, Son, and Spirit. It seems to me that when we jettison
the doctrine of eternal generation, there are dire consequences that
we reap. And interestingly enough, The
men in charge, or the men who authorized the creedal statement
at Nicaea, were protecting against the very things that people say,
if you hold that, it will lead to. No. Nicaea was designed to
refute Arianism. So the doctrine of eternal generation
cannot be Arian. I've probably confused everybody
here. Just pay attention. Don't tune out. I would be remiss
if I didn't deal with this. This is the representative position
in a lot of evangelical reform. I don't want to say a lot of
reform. a denial of the eternal generation
of the Son. And it's interesting. I don't
know if this is a necessary corollary, but those who deny eternal generation
end up with a subordination. They end up with a son subordinate
to the father. Eternal generation does not lead
to that. In fact, let me quote a man,
Giles. He says, Athanasius, who, by
the way, whenever I study the incarnation of the person of
Christ, Athanasius was a hero. Athanasius was a solid man. He
was a true, sure guide. Fought against Arianism. Fought
against those who denied the deity of our Lord Jesus. Fought
those who said there was a time when the sun was not. Athanasius
was a dear brother in the Lord. He's going to be one of those
men that we're going to rejoice to meet at the marriage supper
of the Lamb. Giles says, Athanasius and all
the Nicene theologians saw clearly that to speak of the Son of God
as eternally begotten not only safeguarded His full divinity,
but also indelibly distinguished Him from the Father. The language
only begotten or eternally begotten or eternal generation was employed
to highlight the self-differentiation of the Father and the Son. That's
what the language was designed to protect. The deity of Christ
and the difference between the persons of the Father and the
Son. To jettison that is not a good
thing. Nicea is an important creed. The Athanasian is an important
creed. The Chalcedonian creed is important. You say, well, you know, those
guys just didn't know. That's some of the argument that's
going on today. The Greek doesn't do what they
say it does. They were Greek. That was their
language. To say that we in the 21st century
know Greek better than a Greek speaker in the 3rd century or
the 4th century seems a bit of a stretch. Interestingly enough,
the fathers, according to Giles, never went to the Johannine epistles
with that word monogenes, which is only begotten. They never,
never hung that doctrine on that. Sometimes people say, well, it's
not explicitly taught in the scripture. There's not one verse
that says what you Christians say it says concerning this thing. That is a faulty method as well. If you take your Bible concordance
out and you look up the word Trinity, you will not find it
there. But when you turn from Genesis
and you read through Revelation, you can't escape the Trinity.
You can't miss the Trinity. You can't avoid the Trinity.
Just be mindful of the fact that the Nicene Creed, in my estimation,
is right and our confession of faith is right to protect this
doctrine of the eternal generation of the Son in order to provide
an argument for the full divinity of our Lord Jesus and to bring
differentiation between the persons of the Father and the Son. You
see, they weren't only arguing against Arianism, but they're
arguing against modalism. God isn't this sort of a being
who was the Father, became the Son, and now He's the Spirit.
That is heresy as well. It is represented today by Oneness
Pentecostals. Unless he has repented, it is
the theology or the Christology of T.D. Jakes. This is not to
be embraced. It is not to be cozied up to.
It is rather a denial of the truth of God. If it wasn't a
big deal, we wouldn't mention names. But if you do not believe,
Jesus says, that I am, you will die in your sins. I don't know
of any other place that Jesus says such a statement concerning
a particular truth. He doesn't say, unless you believe
that postmillennialism is right, you will die in your sins. Unless
you believe that a baptist ecclesiology is right, you will die in your
sins. Unless you believe that infant baptism is right, you
will die. He doesn't do that. But I said at the outset, please
pay attention. Christology is everything for
us. Is that what we're about? Is
that what defines us? Isn't that what everything is
to the Christian? Is it Jesus? Is it Savior? 2
John 9 tells us in very clear language, whoever transgresses
and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine
of Christ has both the Father and the Son. If you don't have
this doctrine of Christ, you're in a bad place. Jesus' glory
was beheld in the fact that He is the only begotten of the Father. He is divine. He is God. He is glorious. The Nicene Creed
says, I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son
of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, God of God. Light of light, very God of very
God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father,
by whom all things were made, who for us men and for our salvation
came down from heaven. That's what it's about. It's
the purpose for the incarnation. Listen to the Nicene Creed. Who
for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven. Why does
He do this? Why does the One who is the eternal
Word, who is God Himself in time, space and history become flesh? Who for us men and for our salvation
came down from heaven. Isn't that beautiful? and was
incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and was made
man, and was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered,
was buried, and the third day he rose again according to the
Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right
hand of the Father. He shall come again with glory
to judge the living and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end."
Our confession speaks this way concerning the distinction between
the Father and the Son. In this divine and infinite being,
there are three subsistences. If big words scare you, get over
it. You see, one of the things that
faced the early church was finding words and vocabulary to capture
biblical truth and concept and present them in creedal form. See, today often we're just too
lazy to spend the time to type it into dictionary.com. We played
Boggle last night. We haven't done that for a long
time. And my wife or I occasionally try to sneak in a word. I think
hers was chew. C-H-O-O. It's the word that represents
the sound that a train makes. You see, I got moo. It is the
word that represents the sound that a cow makes. Moo's legit. You know, oftentimes, if you're
playing these word games, you're often just too lazy to get up
and go get a dictionary. Have you ever had that? Nah,
I don't even want to look it up. I'll give you chew. And then
we operate in the assumption that chew's a word. Well, I got
a phone with dictionary.com. I don't even have to get up anymore.
I don't have to go four feet and grab the dictionary. Christians,
there's so many resources at your disposal. There's so much
embodiment of truth written for your edification. Very often
an exegetical help is dictionary.com. What's a subsistence? Type it
in. You'll find out. Pull the confession
of faith off the shelf and read it alongside of your scriptures
on a daily basis. Commit January 1st, God Most
High, help me to take seriously the study of your word. Help
me to read scripture and help me to understand truth. If, as
we saw on Wednesday night, part of a worthy walk before the Lord
is increasing in the knowledge of God, then there's no excuse
for our laziness, there's no excuse for our neglect, there
is no excuse for us to reject the many things that God has
supplied for our growth in grace and in the knowledge of His dear
Son. The early church faced the necessity
of using human language to conceptualize, embody, and present the truth
of Holy Scripture. When you read discussions concerning
the Trinity, you're going to need to look up a word or two.
That's okay. If you wanted to plant vegetables
in your backyard, you'd need to look up a word or two. If
you want to study mathematics at university, you're going to
have to look up a word or two. If you want to be good in your
business situation, or you want to be a good housewife, and make
good food, you're going to have to look up a word or two. If
you want to function in daily society, very often, you're going
to have to look up a word or two. Why is it such a chore for
Christians to look up a word or two? Oh, these big words! Oh, these big words! Big words
are the vehicles by which God puts truth in our heads and hearts. They are the vehicles loaded
down with good things about our God. Our confession says in this
divine and infinite being there are three subsistences, persons,
the Father, the Word, or Son, and the Holy Spirit, of one substance,
power, and eternity, each having the whole divine essence, yet
the essence undivided. The Father is of none, neither
begotten nor preceding. The Son is eternally begotten
of the Father. It is designed to show us and
to demonstrate us what differentiates the Father from the Son, what
differentiates the Spirit from the Father and the Son. It is
simply wrong and heretical to say, Father, thank you for dying
for us on the cross. The Father didn't die for us
on the cross. Jesus died for us on the cross.
Now, I'm not just saying that if you make a mistake, you're
going to cross the threshold of hell, but so often we're so
sloppy in the way that we think concerning these truths. And
there really isn't a reason for it. We study the Confession on
Sunday mornings. You know, every year, probably,
you're going to get hit with chapter 2. You're going to get
hit with chapter 7. You're going to hear about the
person and the work of the Lord Jesus Christ. These are good
things. If, as Jesus says, if you do
not believe that I am, you will die in your sins. We ought to
say, I want to know what he is. I want to know who he is. I want
to know what he does. I'm going to spend my time and
energy pursuing those things because it's good. So that's
the way we beheld His glory according to the Apostle. But then notice,
we beheld His glory full of grace and truth. I'm going to ask you
to turn back again to Exodus. Exodus 33. Remember, John is filling us
with Old Testament concepts, isn't he? He became flesh, he
dwelt among us, he tabernacled among us. We've already looked
at Exodus 25 to see that concept of tabernacle. We've already
looked at Ezekiel 11, concept of tabernacle. We've alluded
to the temple under Solomon. Once he prays, he dedicates,
the Shekinah glory comes down. John says, when we looked at
this one, this Word became flesh, we beheld His glory. We saw His
divinity shining forth through His incarnation. We saw Him as
the only begotten Son of God. But as well, something that uniquely
described Him, something that is essential to His character,
is grace and truth. Remember back in Exodus 33. Moses
says in verse 18, please show me your glory. That's a good request, isn't
it? Show me your glory. Think John, we beheld his glory
as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. Notice, God says, verse 19, I
will make all my goodness pass before you, and I will proclaim
the name of the Lord before you. I will be gracious to whom I
will be gracious, and I will have compassion on whom I will
have compassion. And then drop down, verse 5 of
34. Now the Lord descended in the
cloud and stood within there and proclaimed the name of the
Lord. And the Lord passed before him and proclaimed, This is a
demonstration of His glory. God is passing by Moses' servant. He has hidden him safely in the
cleft of the rock. He's not going to shine His face
upon him, but Moses rather is going to get a glimpse as he
passes by. The Lord God, merciful and gracious,
long-suffering and abounding in goodness and truth, keeping
mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and
sin, by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity
of the fathers upon the children and the children's children to
the third and the fourth generation. John says essentially the same
thing that Moses witnessed when Yahweh passes by. John says that
in the person and in the work of the Lord Jesus Christ, we
have the embodiment of grace and truth. Just like Moses witnessed
Yahweh's pass, so we beheld His glory, as of the only begotten
of the Father, and this One who is full, not partial, but He's
full of grace and truth. Carson says, the glory revealed
to Moses when the Lord passed in front of him and sounded his
name, displaying that divine goodness characterized by ineffable
grace and truth, was the very same glory John and his friends
saw in the Word made flesh. If you understand John 1, there's
a sense where it's terrifying. God says you can't behold my
glory and live. I'm going to hide you in the
cleft of the rock. There is a veil placed before
Moses. There's a veil placed on Moses'
face when he goes and he stands before the children of Israel
because the face is shining so brightly they can't bear to look.
Veiled in flesh, the Godhead see. Hail the incarnate deity. describes his essential attributes. He is full. He is full of grace
and truth. As I said earlier, there is that
covenantal theme that is running through here. Just as Jesus is
the true tabernacle, John 1, 14, Jesus is the mediator of
the new covenant. The law came by Moses, but grace
and truth, same words that we have in verse 14, came by Jesus
Christ. What is John saying? He is saying
what Warfield said, that I quoted earlier. John's prologue traces
the whole history of the recreation of a dead world into newness
of life. The true tabernacle of God, the
mediator of the New Covenant, is the Word, who became flesh,
and who dwelt among us. And we beheld His glory. We saw
it. We basked in it. We delighted
in it. We reveled in it. We adored Him
as a result of it. And now John, under the power
and inspiration of the Holy Spirit, takes Pam to write concerning
it. Brethren, from this we learn
three things and then we close. First, the person of Christ.
He is the unique link between heaven and earth. He is the one
alone that can save us from our sins. His divinity is displayed. His humanity is displayed. His position with the Father
is displayed. He is the glorious God of heaven
and earth, become flesh for us men and for our salvation. Watson puts it this way, that
man should be made in God's image was a wonder, but that God should
be made in man's image is a greater wonder. That the ancient of days
should be born, that he who thunders in the heavens should cry in
the cradle, that he who rules the stars should suck the breast,
that a virgin should conceive, that Christ should be made of
a woman, and of that woman which himself made, that the branch
should bear the vine, that the mother should be younger than
the child she bear, and the child in the womb bigger than the mother,
that the human nature should not be God, yet one with God."
It is the mystery of the incarnation. Secondly, For a moment, we look
at verse 1. We see that in the beginning
was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
We look at verse 10, and we see that He was in the world. And
we ask the question, how did this come to pass? And verse
14 satisfies that answer, or that question. The Word became
flesh and dwelt among us. If then, logically, we ask, why
does He do this? I've already alluded to it in
the Nicene Creed. For us men and for our salvation.
Just a couple of thoughts concerning the Incarnation. There's a lot
to be said. Notice Joel Beakey just wrote
a book. Man writes a lot of books. Thirty-one meditations on the
Incarnation. Others have written books on
why did Jesus come? You know, some have answered
that question to be a political liberator. You know, you've got
Jesus, like Che Guevara. No. Jesus is the founder of a
new sect and a new religion. No. Jesus is a revolutionary. Armed Jesus. No. Just a couple
of thoughts concerning the Incarnation. He took on the nature of man
to redeem man. Hebrews 2.17. He does not take
on angels, but he takes on Abraham's seed. He was touched by our weakness. He was tempted in all points
like we are, yet without sin. He obeyed the law of God perfectly. Remember at the baptism of our
Lord Jesus, John says, no, I should be baptized by you. Jesus says,
permit it for now. It is necessary to fulfill all
righteousness. Hebrews 10 cites this also. The upper room discourse, the
Lord Christ says, I have finished. the work that you gave me to
do." Every step of his earthly life was marked by his obedience
to the Father's will. Do you know why he did that?
It was for us men and for our salvation, because every step
that we take is not an obedience in accord with God's will, but
it is to run from God's will. We need a champion. We need a
victor. We need one who in our stead
obeys the law perfectly. And He does that. My meat is
to do the will of Him who sent me. I have food that you know
nothing about. I always do that which is pleasing
to my Father. Do you think Jesus is doing that
in order to have people pat Him on the back? He's expressing
one aspect of His divine mission. Somebody must fulfill the law
of God. And as Christians, as believers,
isn't it a joy to realize that aspect? The Confession or the
Catechism speaks of it as the imputation of Christ's righteousness. Only that which could be imputed
was that which was accomplished. He fulfilled everything. I rejoice
in that. Machen rejoiced in that. You
know, the dying words of that dear brother on his deathbed
was, I'm so thankful for the active obedience of Christ because
there's no hope without it. You see, we need forgiveness.
Christ answers to that. But we need a righteousness.
Christ answers to that. Peto says that the old covenant,
the Mosaic covenant, functioned as a covenant of works for Jesus. What Adam fails in the garden
to do in terms of the covenant of works, it's republished at
Sinai specifically for the Lord Christ so that he can fulfill
all righteousness and obey the Father. We need that. If you ever look at your own
life, try to keep the Sabbath today holy. Try to do that. Try. Try to have no thought other
than holy thoughts. Try to have no conversation other
than holy conversation. Try to think about what I'm saying,
even now, for a day. I think Calvin was right. Sabbath-keeping shows us our
need for the Sabbath-keeper quintessential, the Lord Christ. He suffered in our place. You
see, we not only need the righteousness of Christ, the act of obedience,
we need that imputed to us, received by faith alone, we need forgiveness,
don't we? You ever prayed through the commandments?
Sometimes people say, Martin Luther was an antinomian, he
didn't want anything to do with the law of God. Well, he'd pray
through those ten commandments. And he'd stop along the way and
confess his sins to the Lord God Almighty. You ever do that? You ever think about the first
commandment, you shall have no other gods before me? You ever
thought, well, I'm not out worshipping sticks and stones, I'm not constructed
idols, vis-a-vis the second commandment. Do you ever stop to think how
often you worship yourself? How often self comes before everything,
everybody, before God? You ever considered the reality
that in each and every step of the way in the Decalogue, we
are guilty, vile, and helpless. We are sinful through and through. What does Paul say? He was delivered
up because of our offenses. He was put on that cross not
because He was a sinner. He was put on that cross not
because He was a criminal. He was put on that cross because
we're sinners and we're criminals and we've offended a holy God.
And unless there is blood atonement, there is no remission from sin.
The blood of bulls and goats can never take away sin, so God
sends His Son, and John the Baptist says, Behold, the Lamb of God,
who takes away the sin of the world. What was the purpose of
the Lamb in the Old Covenant situation? It was to get its
throat cut and to be burned before the living and true God. That's
what happens with Christ. That's what it's about. That's
why Jesus came. It wasn't just to make you feel
warm a couple of times of the year. He was delivered up because
of our sins. God heaped upon Him our sin.
2 Corinthians 5.21 puts it in ways that an uninspired man wouldn't
put it. Nobody outside of inspiration
would say, God made him who knew no sin to be sin for us. I'd be afraid to write such things
if Paul hadn't first. God made him who knew no sin
to be sin for us. So that when the wrath and fury
and judgment of God came upon him, he was punishing us in his
stead. He was taking the punishment
due to us in our stead. That's glorious. That's what
it's about. For us men, and for our salvation,
He came down from heaven. And He was raised, according
to Paul, in that same passage, for our justification. Why did Christ come? To save
us from our sins. Why did Christ come? To fulfill
the law. to die as a substitute and a
sacrifice, and to rise on the third day to ascend into glory
where He ever lives for His people. Watson comments on that 2 Corinthians
8, 9 passage in unison with the incarnation. He says, he was
poor that he might make us rich. He was born of a virgin that
we might be born of God. He took our flesh that he might
give us his spirit. He lay in the manger that we
might lie in paradise. He came down from heaven that
he might bring us to heaven. And what was all this but love?
If our hearts be not rocks, this love of Christ should affect
us. Behold, love that passes knowledge."
Well, if you are here this morning and you've not come to this Lord
Jesus Christ, it is a great privilege to be able to say, Believe. Believe in Him. This is the purpose
that John wrote this letter, or this gospel. The prologue,
the life, the ministry, the crucifixion, the resurrection, all of that
John's endgame is told us in John 20, 30, and 31. Truly Jesus
did many other signs in the presence of his disciples which are not
written in this book. But these are written that you
may believe that Jesus is the Christ. Don't leave today without
believing that. Believe on the Lord Jesus, believe
that He is the Christ, believe that He is the Son of God, and
that believing you may have life in His name. That's what the
Gospel is. Christ's life, death, and resurrection. All those who believe will have
everlasting life. Payson says, reflecting on Isaiah
9.6, "...admire Him as wonderful, consult Him as Counselor, adore
Him as God, be born of Him as your everlasting Father, and
submit to Him as the Prince of Peace. Believe according to the
Gospel of John, and you will have everlasting life. Let us
pray. Our Father, we thank You for
Your Word and for Your grace and Your mercy. We thank You
for the Lord Jesus, the incarnate Word, and how we bless you and
praise you that this One who is God became flesh, that He
dwelt among us, that His glory was beheld, that He is the only
begotten of the Father. He is full of grace and truth.
We pray that grace and truth would be poured out today in
the churches. We pray that by the power of your Spirit you
would bring forth sinners and that you would save a great multitude
that no man can number. We pray that You would bless
and encourage and strengthen Your sheep, cause us to be faithful
to Him who loved us, to Him who gave Himself for us. And we ask
this in His most blessed name. Amen.