← Back to sermon library
Well, please turn with me in
your Bibles to 1 Samuel 22. God willing, we'll return to
our exposition of Matthew's Gospel next Sunday morning, but this
morning we're looking at 1 Samuel chapter 22, verses 6 to 23. For the last several sections,
I've tried to summarize with one word the chapters that we've
looked at. Chapter 19, we saw deliverance. The Lord God delivers David from
Saul. Chapter 20 is covenant. David's
covenant with Jonathan was that which God used to encourage his
servant. In chapter 21, we saw provision. The mention of many places, many
geographical locations where David went. He found refreshment
in various forms and so God gave provision to his servant. Well,
here in chapter 22 verses 6 to 23, that one word would be massacre. Saul and his wickedness become
more apparent as we move through the narrative. If David is a
man after God's own heart and on a rise to power ultimately
over the nation of Israel, and a place close to the heart of
the God of Israel, Saul is coming unraveled, violently and wickedly
so. So I want to read the section
and then we'll look at several things in the text. Beginning
in 22.6, when Saul heard that David and the men who were with
him had been discovered. Now Saul was staying in Gibeah
under a tamarisk tree in Ramah with his spear in his hand and
all his servants standing about him. And Saul said to his servants
who stood about him, here now you Benjamites, will the son
of Jesse give every one of you fields and vineyards and make
you all captains of thousands and captains of hundreds? All
of you have conspired against me. And there is no one who reveals
to me that my son has made a covenant with the son of Jesse. And there
is not one of you who is sorry for me or reveals to me that
my son has stirred up my servant against me to lie and wait as
it is this day.' Then answered Doeg the Edomite, who was set
over the servants of Saul, and said, I saw the son of Jesse
going to Nob, to Ahimelech, the son of Ahitab. And he inquired
of the Lord for him, He gave him provisions and gave him the
sword of Goliath, the Philistine. So the king sent to call Ahimelech,
the priest, the son of Ahithah, and all his father's house, the
priests who were in Nab. And they all came to the king.
And Saul said, Here now, son of Ahithah. He answered, Here
I am, my lord. And Saul said to him, why have
you conspired against me, you and the son of Jesse, in that
you have given him bread and a sword and have inquired of
God for him, that he should rise against me to lie in wait as
it is this day? So Ahimelech answered the king
and said, and who among all your servants is as faithful as David? Who is the king's son-in-law
who goes at your bidding and is honorable in your house? Did
I then begin to inquire of God for him? Far be it from me. Let not the king impute anything
to his servant or to any in the house of my father. For your
servant knew nothing of all this, little or much. And the king
said, you shall surely die, Ahimelech, you and all your father's house.
And the king said to the guards who stood about him, turn and
kill the priests of the Lord, because their hand also is with
David, and because they knew when he fled and did not tell
it to me. But the servants of the king would not lift their
hands or strike the priests of the Lord. And the king said to
Doeg, you turn and kill the priests. So Doeg, the Edomite, turned
and struck the priests and killed, on that day, 85 men who wore
a linen ephod. Also Nob, the city of the priests,
he struck with the edge of the sword, both men and women, children
and nursing infants, oxen and donkeys and sheep with the edge
of the sword. Now one of the sons of Ahimelech,
the son of Ahitab, named Abiathar, escaped and fled after David.
And Abiathar told David that Saul had killed the Lord's priests.
So David said to Abiathar, I knew that day when Doeg the Edomite
was there, that he would surely tell Saul, I have caused the
death of all the persons of your father's house. Stay with me. Do not fear. For he who seeks
my life seeks your life. But with me, you shall be safe.
Amen. Well, let us pray. Our blessed
God and our Holy Father, we thank you for the Word of God. We thank
you that you've not left us alone in this world. You've given us
the Spirit, the other Comforter, the one just like your Son. We
thank you that you've given us both the Old and the New Testament.
We pray that you would give us wisdom now, that the Spirit would
guide us and lead us and illumine our minds and hearts that we
may receive what you would have for us from this passage of Holy
Scripture. We confess our sins to you and
our transgressions. We know, Lord God, that we don't
live in light of the Word of God as we ought, and as believers
we struggle with remaining corruption, and we confess that corruption
to you and pray for cleansing in the blood of the Lamb. And
Father, for any and all here outside of Christ, we pray that
today they would meet the Priest of God, even the Lord Jesus Christ,
that one to whom Abiathar points. And we pray that by your grace
they would come to you through Christ and know the joy of everlasting
life. We thank you for your word. We
thank you for your goodness and for your graciousness. We thank
you for not dealing with us according to our transgression. We thank
you for bringing us to this place. And we pray that you would be
glorified and honored. And we ask through Jesus Christ
our Lord. Amen. Well, as I said, it is
the case that we are seeing Saul come unraveled. He is a man from
whom the Spirit of God has departed. And in several instances, a distressing
spirit from the Lord has come upon Saul and he's engaged in
wickedness. He has no reason whatsoever to
seek to destroy David. David is a national hero. David
is a man whom the Lord God had gifted Israel with, a man who
had beaten Goliath on the field of battle in the Valley of Elah.
And ever since that instance, Saul has been overruled by envy,
by rage, by malice, by distrust. He is truly a man that is coming
unglued. As we come to this passage, we'll
look at three particulars. In the first place, we'll notice
Saul's pity party at Gibeah. That is precisely what happens
in verses 6 to 10. It's a pity party. Perhaps you've
undergone something like this in your own life. Perhaps you've
seen it in your own children. Perhaps you've seen it in others.
That idea where everything is all about them and they're moaning
and they're whining and they're groaning and they're complaining.
That is what's overtaken the king of Israel. A man who's supposed
to be mature, a man who's supposed to be level-headed, a man who's
supposed to have government over his own soul and life has a pity
party in Gibeah in verses 6 to 10. In the second place, we see
the massacre at Gibeah and Nob in verses 11 to 19. And then
in the third place, the escape of Abiathar in verses 20 to 23. So that'll be the course of exposition
and then we'll try and make some practical observations on the
passage when we conclude. But notice in the first place
this pity party in Gibeah. It gives us the location. When
Saul, verse 6, heard that David and the men who were with him
had been discovered. Now Saul was staying in Gibeah.
This is where he lived. This is where his palace was.
under a tamarisk tree in Ramah with his spear in his hand and
all his servants standing about him." Someone still hasn't talked
him out of holding on to that spear. Now certainly it's an
indication or symbol or an emblem of his royal authority, but certainly
after his proven record up to this point of being unbalanced
or imbalanced, somebody should have tried to take that spear
away from him. Now notice the accusatory question
that he poses to his servants. He is there with his men. He
is there with those who are supposedly those who support him and all
he has is condemnation. Notice in verse 7, Saul said
to his servants who stood about him, here now you Benjamites,
will the son of Jesse give every one of you fields and vineyards
and make you all captains of thousands and captains of hundreds?
I think it's important for us to appreciate something. This
is probably how Saul had kept the servants under his employ. This is probably how Saul kept
his servants loyal. Remember when Israel demands
a king. Samuel then tells the people
under God, through the prophetic word, what manner of a king they
would receive. And essentially the king would
exploit the people over whom he ruled. The king would give
their lands and give their resources to his officers. It seems to
me that Saul is doing the very thing that he is accusing these
men of being loyal to David for. Look at the text in verse 7.
He says, Will the son of Jesse give every one of you fields
and vineyards and make you all captains of thousands and captains
of hundreds? Sort of like we might say, like
I do. Saul is trying to bribe them.
Saul is trying to keep them under his grasp. Saul does not want
them to depart and go and serve David. It truly is an abuse of
power. We see him coming unraveled in
the spiritual realm. We see him coming unraveled when
it comes to rationality. But we see him doubling down
when it comes to political tyranny. He will protect his position
at all costs. And what he does in terms of
indicting these servants is to suggest to them that if David
won't deliver the goods, then you ought to remain loyal to
me because I will. I will grace your palms. I will
make you happy. I will deliver. He has to pay,
ultimately, for their allegiance. Robert Vannoy says, so in Saul's
questions to the members of his court, we get an indirect commentary
on how far Saul had strayed from an awareness of his office as
a covenantal king. He had used the land in Israel,
fields and vineyards, that really belonged to the Lord, to bind
his court officials to himself. He had personalized his office
and then concluded that David was doing the same. That's what's
happening here. Now notice what he goes on to
do in terms of his accusation in verse 8. All of you have conspired
against me. There's no evidence to suggest
that is the case whatsoever. This man is paranoid. He's falling
apart. He sees problems where they don't
exist. David was victorious in the field
of battle. Everybody said this is a good
thing. Saul rejected it because it did not give glory to Saul. Notice, he says, the servants
knew but did not tell Saul concerning the covenant between Jonathan
and David. And then, what he says in the
last place is truly incredible. What it says in verse 8, and
there is not one of you who is sorry for me or reveals to me
that my son has stirred up my servant against me to lie in
wait as it is this day. Could there be anything more
pitiful or pathetic than a sinner who plays the victim. This is
typical sinner conduct, by the way. He doesn't say, I've made
a mess of everything. My heart and my rage against
David has brought me to this place. No, you won't feel sorry
for me. You have to defend me. You have
to protect me. You have to fawn all over me.
You have to cater to me. You have to agree with me. This
is the picture of political tyranny. This is something that I think
our author also wants us to appreciate. That when men are devoid of the
Spirit of God, you cannot trust for a moment that things will
go well for the persons for whom they govern. This man is in a
wretched, sorry condition. He's engaging in a pity party
in Gibeah. And now notice what he says,
or what happens in verse 9. Verse 9, then answer, Doeg the
Edomite. Remember there was a snapshot
of Doeg the Edomite in the past chapter. Chapter 21, verse 7. David goes to the city of Nob.
He needs bread. He needs provision. He's on,
according to him, a secret mission from Saul. So Ahimelech the priest
gives him this bread. But there's this brief snapshot
that Doeg the Edomite happened to be there that day. Happened
to be there. There's no happen to be there
in the book of 1 Samuel. It is the providence of Almighty
God who governs all his creatures and all their actions according
to his most holy, wise, and powerful preservation. But Doeg was there. It was foreshadowing. Now Doeg
the Edomite comes back. He's probably a foreign mercenary
that is subject to Saul's government. And notice what he says. He was
sent over the servants of Saul, and he said, I saw the son of
Jesse going to Nob, to Ahimelech, the son of Ahithah. And he inquired
of the Lord for him, gave him provisions, and gave him the
sword of Goliath, the Philistine. Doeg, in many ways, does report
what actually occurred, though I'm not convinced that David
inquired of the Lord then. Everybody says that. Ahimelech
says, no, I did not do that. But look at what Doeg does. Doeg's
a bit, in a bit, in a sense, sort of feeding Saul's suspicions.
He's sort of fanning the flames. He's not trying to minimize the
situation. He's not trying to put off the
situation, but rather he is instigating. David Samora says, not only does
Doeg claim that Ahimelech inquired of God's will for David, but
he calls the holy bread provisions and refers next to the sword
of Goliath. Each statement more military
than the next, increasing the listener's tension, provoking
the suspicion that the priest was aiding David in military
preparations against who else, But Saul. So you see what happens
here. Saul is whining to his servants. Doeg says, I saw David in Nob
with Ahimelech. And Ahimelech gave him provisions. And Ahimelech gave him a sword. And Ahimelech aided him in inquiring
of Yahweh. Doeg, as Samorah points out,
is charging Saul. or encouraging Saul to believe
that David is going to mount opposition against Saul's reign. But what does a tyrant do? Does
he sit down and discuss the matter? Does he say, you know, we need
to have a summit? We need to exchange some watches
and some hot chocolate? We need to speak kindly to one
another? No, not this tyrant. Note the second place. how Saul
deals with a perceived threat to his kingdom. Notice, the massacre
at Nibia and Gaul, verses 11 to 13. He accuses Ahimelech. Now, brethren, I'm pointing this
out a little bit because we are in an election cycle. I don't
believe this text has direct application to who we choose
as a prime minister or who the Americans choose as a president.
Unless you've been living under a rock, you know there are election
cycles in both countries. But I certainly believe that
the Church of Jesus Christ ought to have the wherewithal to know
something about politics, to know something about tyranny,
to know something about God-hating rebels who occupy a place of
authority over others. Saul throws off the rule of God
absolutely. What does Deuteronomy 17 specify? The very moment that a king occupies
the throne in Israel. You know what his first job is?
Has nothing to do with foreign policy. Has nothing to do with
economic growth. Has nothing to do with jobs creation. Has nothing to do with all those
particulars. What is the primary and first
procedure of the reigning king in Israel is to take out his
own pen, his own piece of paper, and write for himself the law
of God. Saul couldn't care less! Had
Saul written out the law of God, that self-same chapter 17 in
Deuteronomy and chapter 19 would have told Saul, you need witnesses.
There's this thing called due process. There is this issue
wherein the government shouldn't just be able to take you out
of your home and throw you into prison or murder you without
somebody hearing your side of it. Due process is from God and
Saul rejects it. Notice, he addresses Ahimelech
and the way that Saul addresses David is similar. He's always
the son of Jesse, isn't he? Well, here Ahimelech is the son
of Ahithah. He's not Ahimelech. Again, Saul,
it seems, keeps men at distance as he's got them under his crosshairs. He assumes the guilt of Ahimelech. He shows no regard whatsoever
for the law of God and its demand that on the basis of two or three
witnesses every fact is established. Why is that that we don't pay
attention to it? Why is it that we are so quick
to throw in our two cents without hearing the matter? Without hearing
from witnesses? Without seeing evidence? You
see it all over the place. We hear a tidbit of information
and we're castigating some and exonerating others. You know,
we're not in a position to make those calls at times. And in
the church, this person looked this way or said this, so as
far as I'm concerned, they're guilty. The first to plead his
cause seems right until his neighbor comes and examines him. Are we
going to be like Saul, rebels, and reject the word of the living
God? Or are we going to calm down?
Are we going to chill out? Are we going to weigh the evidence
and the data and the facts and judge accordingly? Saul has no
regard for the rule of law. It will never go well. When a
man occupies a place of government power who has no regard for the
rule of God's law, it's typically not going to go well for the
people under his government. It's just the way it is. When
a man sets himself up in the position of being God, when he
has become a rival lawmaker and he excludes the living and the
true God, That's not going to be a good situation for the people
under his government. Now notice the defense by Ahimelech. He defends David in the first
place. David is a faithful man. David is your son-in-law. David
holds a high position in the military. David is honored in
the royal court. It's as if Ahimelech is saying,
why in the world would I conspire with David? Why in the world
would I aid and abet this man in his rebellion against you?
A Himelech essentially is saying, I'm not convinced he's in rebellion
against you. All these things are true of
him. He's a faithful man. He is the king's son-in-law.
He holds a high position. He is honored in the royal court.
Why in the world, Saul? Ahimelech at this point is a
bit of the voice of reason to this tyrant, similar to Jonathan
in chapter 19. Remember when Jonathan comes
to Saul in chapter 19, Saul tells his servants and Jonathan, we
need to kill David. And Jonathan says, wait a minute,
and he offers up all these pieces of rational evidence as to why
Saul shouldn't kill David. And Saul for a moment said, okay,
you're right, I won't kill David. And later on he tries to kill
David. What should we glean from that?
Tyrants cannot be reasoned with. They're not rational men. They
are madmen. They are out of their minds.
When a man sees himself as if he is God, for anybody to try
and reason with him, for anybody to try and offer up any counter
evidence, is to suggest that his voice as God isn't good enough. Saul's in a bad state, brethren. Saul is in a horrible place at
this time. Now notice, he then affirms his
innocence. This is the Himalaya in verse
15. Did I then begin to inquire of God for him? Far be it from
me. Let not the king impute anything to his servant or to any in the
house of my father. For your servant knew nothing
of all this, little or much. It's a good case, isn't it? Essentially,
David's a great guy. He's probably not even in opposition
against you. And if he was, I'm certainly
not conspiring with him. I'm just a priest functioning
in the city of Nob seeking to glorify Yahweh. And yet, what
does Saul do? Notice, he calls for a massacre. I wonder if we feel the weight
of this particular passage. It's easy to read through 85
people lost their lives or a city got slaughtered and say, well,
you know, I wasn't there. Didn't happen to me, didn't affect my
family, didn't involve me. Do you see the depths to which
Saul has fallen? It is almost as if the author,
I think he has multi-reasons for the book of 1 Samuel. It's
always about the glory of God. If you ever wonder what a Bible
book is about, you'll never go wrong saying the glory of God.
If you ever ask the question, what is the scope of Scripture?
It is Jesus Christ. You'll never go wrong there.
He asked, why did Samuel write Samuel? Yes, it's to teach us
concerning the glory of God. It's to teach us something concerning
his kingdom here on earth. But it's also teaching us something
theological in nature in terms of the man who's after God's
own heart. How do we dare to be a David?
How do we follow in the footsteps of a man of God like David? But
as well, how do we avoid? How do we resist? How do we guard
against and stay far from Saul? Saul's a wretched picture of
human depravity in all of its filth and blackness and wretchedness. Look at what Saul says in verse
16, the king said, you shall surely die Ahimelech, you and
all your father's house. The utter absence of due process,
Doeg's report and the defendant's response no witnesses, no cross-examination,
no ability to argue this out in a rational and logical and
legal context. No, as far as Saul is concerned,
the testimony of the Edomite trumps everything because it
fits the narrative that Saul wants people to believe. That
David is a usurper, that David is a rebel, that David is a man
not after God's own heart, but a man who is after his own lusts
and his own desires. In other words, Saul is casting
upon David the very things that are true of him. Now notice,
he tells his servants, verse 17, when the king said to the
guards who stood about him, turn and kill the priests of the Lord.
You ever read scripture and think for just a moment, what if I
would have been there? And it's one thing to sit on
a Sunday morning and hear preaching or on a Monday afternoon and
read scripture and sip chamomile and put your pinky finger out
and read passages like these and say, wow, what a terrible
thing. Saul says, turn and kill these
priests. Remember, according to verse 11, when Saul summons
Ahimelech, all the priests of Nob come to Gibeah. All the priests
of Nob are all the priests of Israel. Nob was the city of priests. So presently they're in Gibeah.
The priests have left Nob, they're in Gibeah. Saul has heard all
he needs to hear, and now he tells his servants, turn and
kill the priests. Two problems here. If you were
one of the servants, you'd say, wait a minute, what are you talking
about? Which is, in essence, what they
do. And if you were one of the priests, imagine the response
there. What are you talking about? Kill
me? What did I do? We like to defend
our own lives, don't we? We like to get out of the way
when that car comes careening down the street. We try to move.
When a madman orders our destruction at the hands of men with swords,
we would probably say, wait a minute! Hold your horses, Saul. Steady
this out. Can we talk about this? Note
what the servants do. The servants will not take up
their sword against the priests. In this, they show virtue. But they didn't stop Doeg. In this, they demonstrate heartlessness. John Gill nailed it when he said
their conscience would not suffer them to do it. These men could
not take their swords and murder the priests of Nah, which it
would have been. It would have been murder. Lawlessness,
malice, those things are components that are necessary to define
the crime of murder. He says, their consciences would
not suffer them to do it. They refused to obey the king's
orders and chose rather to expose themselves to his resentment
than to be guilty of such a crime. Saul's footmen had more sense
of honor, justice, and truth than he himself had and were
worthy of praise. It's legit, isn't it? Gil is
right. They had more of a sense of justice
or honor justice and truth than the king himself had. And as
a result, they are worthy of praise. But hear what Gil goes
on to say. But they would have been deserving
of more, more praise, if they could not have prevailed upon
him by entreaties and remonstrances to have foreborn such a bloody
execution. Instead of being the tame spectators
of it, they had taken him and bound him as a madman and so
facilitated the escape of the priests and prevented this shocking
scene of wickedness." I'm sure you've seen the quotes before.
They fly around Facebook or social media all the time. It's not
only the man who takes the sword against the innocent. It's the
man who stands by and does or says nothing that's guilty too. You see what Gil says? They are
worthy of praise insofar as they would not take their sword and
kill the priests of Nob. But you remember Doeg the Edomite,
given the command, says, yeah, I'll take that. That's in my
wheelhouse. I'm not even an Israelite. I'm
not beholden to any priest in any place, especially not in
Israel. Now these servants, or these
soldiers, stood by and watched a mass execution. Brethren, we
may not be the person that is actually cutting off another
person's head, but we may be the bystander watching and saying
nothing. We may be a party to it by our
complicity, by the fact that we are too weak-kneed and too
Nancy-boyish to stand up and intervene. What is more of a
threat to a king than a challenge to his tyranny? You know, it's interesting. King
James, the famous King James of the King James Bible, had
a problem with the Geneva Study Bible. He had a problem with
the Geneva Bible. It wasn't called the Study Bible.
Everybody studied then. You didn't have to tell them,
this is a study Bible. Really? I didn't know what that meant.
Everything is a study Bible. Study the Bible. That should
be just basic information. Well, I can't just study this
Bible because it's not a study Bible. The Geneva Bible had notes
that were a bit offensive to King James, especially in Exodus
chapter 1. Because in Exodus chapter 1,
it commends the Hebrew midwives in their resistance to the tyrant,
Pharaoh. Pharaoh said, butcher baby boys
that have Israelite names. And those Hebrew midwives didn't. As well, in Exodus 1, verse 22,
it tells us how the king's rage was to be poured out upon Israel. And the Geneva Study Bible said
this is the way, I'm just paraphrasing here, this is the way of tyrants
when their authority is challenged. You see, the point though, brethren,
is that at some point, and I'm not here preaching social revolution,
that might be something that's coming to your head. There's
political cycles. Butler's preaching 1 Samuel 22.
Is he going to tell us we need to go get guns and march against
Ottawa? No. But I'm telling us we need to
be more biblically minded when it comes to the world around
us. Why do we oppose tyranny? Why should we oppose tyranny?
Why should we reject rule by wicked men? Why is it the case? Have you wrestled with any of
these things? You ask the question of the Bible,
what sort of political theory do you commend to us? Yeah, we're
not going to answer all of that right here and right now, but
brethren, these are things that Christians need to get in their
heads. We can appear so ignorant. We're going to appear so foolish.
We're going to appear the way that people perceive we actually
are. That we stick our heads in the
sand and we pretend that the world's not out there. You know,
in my mind, in my understanding, with reference to the scripture
and a biblical worldview, it isn't the Christian who stuck
his head in the sand. It is the God-hating rebel. By putting his head in the sand,
he is seeking to exclude the God of heaven and earth. What
happens to Paul when he stands before Festus, or Felix, and
Festus says, Paul, much learning is driving you mad. You say,
well, I'm sorry you feel that way. I apologize. He said, I am not mad, most noble
Festus, but I speak the words of truth and reason. What's the
implication of Paul's statement? Festus, you're mad. You're nuts. You're out of your mind. Christians,
we have answers in the Bible. We know what God's Word is concerning
several issues. So again, this is not a sermon
on social revolution. Show up to my house in the morning
and I'll arm you with the bandoleros and the sombreros and we'll go
out and we'll make our money. No. But think. There's a scary passage in Ezekiel
9, probably one of the scariest, in my estimation, in the entirety
of the Bible. Ezekiel gets a vision, and in
that vision he sees six men. And these six men have slaughtering
weapons, battle weapons, killing weapons. There's another man,
he's clothed in linen, he's got a writer's ink horn. And in the
vision, that man with the linen is told, I want you to go and
I want you to mark the heads of those who sigh and cry over
the abominations in Israel. I want you to go and mark the
heads of those who sigh and cry over the abominations, I think
it's Jerusalem. And then he goes on to say to
the six with the slaughtering weapons, I want you to follow
the one in the linen, and whoever doesn't bear the mark on his
forehead, I want you to kill them. What's the point? Israel has become a bastion of
idolatry. Israel has become a place where
babies are murdered. Israel has become a place where
human sacrifices has been engaged in. Israel has become a place
that looks pagan. Spare the ones who at least sigh
and cry over it. Spare the ones who at least care.
Spare the ones who at least shed tears. But to those who don't
sigh and cry, those who don't care one whit, those who just
care about themselves, take them out. And in the vision, guess
where these men are told to start? Begin at my sanctuary. I see sometimes, and I read sometimes,
and I hear sometimes that pastors don't always preach on, you know,
basic ethics. Why is abortion wrong? Why is euthanasia wrong? Why
is the death penalty right? You need to know these things,
brethren. You need to sigh and cry over the abominations in
the land. Perhaps you are one of these
servants that won't take up sword to dash these priests down to
the earth. Perhaps you're not crying out
to the Lord. You're not intervening as you're
able. You're not saying. You're not
writing. You're not praying. You're not
doing anything. I'm not saying we all have to
be political activists. This is not a call to go stand
up and hold signs in five corners. Pray, brethren. Pray. All of us can pray. I'm not into
that either. Pastors guilt manipulating people.
You've got to write 10 letters to your members of parliament.
I don't care if you write 10 letters. You should be on your
knees at the throne of grace in a time of crisis. The time
where baby murder and old people murder and all sorts of wickedness
are just upon us. Do we cry to God? Do we say,
Oh Lord, how long? We try to pray for the persecuted
church. We try to read the letters and
the updates. We try to keep that before us.
Because out of sight, out of mind, It's one of the best things
about those 10 videos thus far that have come out from CMP. Nobody knows what goes on behind
the doors of a Planned Parenthood clinic. Now they do. And it underscores
this wickedness as well. Now they do and they still don't
care. They still don't care. that babies
are being butchered and their parts are being sold so that
women can joke about purchasing Lamborghinis, and there's still
a debate about defund Planned Parenthood? It just shows you
that men are committed to wickedness. It just shows you that Proverbs
8 is absolutely correct. Those who reject Me, that's Christ
speaking His wisdom, love death. They love it. They traffic in
it. They dance in it. They celebrate
it. And it's all over. That's US. Happens in Canada
too. I'm going to preach on the sixth commandment tonight. Euthanasia. It's the new law in 2016 in Canada. Does that concern us? Does that
bother us? Does it affect us? Yeah, I'm
not trying to manipulate you. Write ten whatever's to whoever.
You know, email with this petition. But brethren, at some basic level
in our human psyche, it ought to affect us enough to pray,
to cry out to the Lord God. So notice, Goeg steps up to the
task. And what does he do? He murders
the priests there in Gibeah. Remember, they'd all left Nob
and they came with Ahimelech to Gibeah. So Doeg, probably
not single-handedly, probably some Doegites, some of his supporters,
assisted him in the task, the bloody and the cruel task, of
ridding Saul of his problem, which had never been affirmed
to even be a problem. These 85 priests certainly didn't
do anything. A Himelech didn't do anything.
There was no witness evidence to corroborate this whole spiel. But Doeg is right there to execute
the wrath of Saul upon the priests of Nod. Talk about religious
persecution, huh? You see, that wasn't enough.
That's never enough. The tyrant's sword is never satisfied
with the blood it gets. Look at what happens. They're
in Gibeah. Doeg the Edomite, middle of verse
18, turned and struck the priests and killed on that day 85 men
who wore a linen ephod. Also Nob, the city of the priests,
he struck with the edge of the sword, both men and women, children
and nursing infants, oxen and donkeys and sheep, with the edge
of the sword. Wasn't enough to slay those men.
Let's go kill their families. And not just their families,
their livestock and everything. Those of you who have been there
on Wednesday night, you'll know the principle. It's called the
harem. Harem principle. It's a thick H sound, kind of
a CH in Hebrew. Harem. What's the harem principle? It's what God commands in holy
war. When Israel goes to dispossess the land, they're not to do it
with a social media campaign, they're to do it in a bloody
manner. They are to kill all the men, all the women, all the
children, all the livestock, and dispossess them from the
land. Isn't it intriguing? This was
Saul's command in chapter 15. In chapter 15, Saul was told
by God to go and to kill Agag and the Amalekites. When Saul
goes to deal with the Amalekites, he doesn't kill Agag. He doesn't
kill the livestock. He spares them, probably for
his own greedy, ill-gotten gain. But he makes up this story that
I thought we could sacrifice to the Lord. It rings hollow,
buddy, because you're a wretch. Note what's happened. Chapter
15, Saul is supposed to do this to the Amalekites and he doesn't.
This is the self-same chapter that we often refer to to teach
that rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft. That's what Samuel
says to Saul because God commanded Saul to go and institute this
harem principle upon the Amalekites and take care of business. He
doesn't do it to the Amalekites, but he does it in Israel. You ever get that glimpse at
the end of Judges? There's a similarity to what
happens in Sodom. At the end of Judges, there is
a similar situation to what takes place in Sodom and Gomorrah. It's a vile rape scene. You know what the author at the
end of Judges is telling us? Israel has become the new Sodom. The author here is telling us
that Saul, the tyrant, will reject and rebel against the word of
the living God when it comes to the legitimate enemies of
Israel. But when it comes to Saul's enemies,
his perceived enemies, his enemies who haven't been convicted or
convicted according to due process, for Saul now he'll implement
this harem principle. For Saul now he will exterminate
not only the priests, but their families. Robert Alter says,
now he is carrying out the ban he executed only imperfectly
against Amalek. The terms used are virtually
identical. But the massacre is directed
at his own innocent people. Saul's madness has become sinister
and lethal. Now before we move on, we need
to understand how sovereign God really is. Saying that seems
odd, right? How sovereign God really is.
Sovereign means what it means. But He's so sovereign. No, He's
sovereign. But we need superlatives and
we need adverbs or adjectives. We need to make it more so. He is the most sovereign-ist. You see, this brutal, wretched,
ghastly, ghoulish scene fulfills the Word of God. There's high
mystery here. Our confession says the doctrine
of predestination needs to be handled with prudence. Back in
chapter 2, there was a priest named Eli. Guess who Abiathar
is directly related to? Eli did not function as a godly
man. Eli did not restrain his sons.
As a result, his sons plunged the sacrificial system into great,
great troubles. God told Eli, through the prophet
Samuel, that his house would be destroyed. Don't forget that. In case you
forgot that, This incident at Nob, this incident at Gibeah,
ought to rehearse the reality that God doesn't forget His word,
God doesn't forget His promise, God does not neglect His own
prophecy. He brings it to pass. I'm going
to lean on Davis here because I think he says it well. Ghastly,
brutal, and unjust, yet one cannot read of Doeg's slaughter without
recalling the prophecy of chapter 2. Doeg's butchery fulfills the
word of God against the house of Eli. That word had been spoken
perhaps 40, maybe 50 years before. No, now in the carnage at Gibeah
and Nob it had come to pass. He says, don't berate the word
of God. God is not the author of this evil. Place the blame
where it belongs, on this renegade Edomite and on the Antichrist
who commands him. They dared to destroy the priests
of Yahweh. It is a horrid wickedness for
which Saul and Doeg are fully responsible. It is a clear fulfillment
of the word Yahweh had spoken. Put it together and one truth
becomes clear. Please listen. I personally don't
care if the food is hot, cold, or whatever. I think people should
stay till the sermon is over. We can eat cold food, brethren,
or not have coffee in the first minute. This stuff is absolutely
crucial. Listen to what David goes on
to say. Put it together and one truth becomes clear. Even in
opposing God's kingdom, God's enemies only bring to pass God's
Don't you find comfort there? That's another thing that really
ought to get our goat, is those who have a problem with the sovereignty
of God. Oh, we don't like this doctrine
of predestination or election or sovereignty. What are you
talking about? We want to say with Paul, blessed
be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed
us with every blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just
as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world.
In love He's predestined us. There is nothing more comforting
to the saint of Christ than the sovereignty of God. Why is it
the case that that's offensive to some who name and profess
Christ? If you haven't tasted and seen
the sovereignty of God, you're short. You're gypped. You are
not where you ought to be. Davis is absolutely correct.
Even in opposing God's kingdom, God's enemies only bring to pass
God's word. You see a similar instance. We're
running out of time. But in Acts chapter 4, how do
they pray? How do the saints pray? How do
the apostles pray? to do whatever your hand predetermined
to do. Oh, they acknowledge the wickedness
of Herod and Pilate and their complicity in putting the death
of the Lord Jesus Christ, but they say, doing what your hand
determined to do. Sovereignty wasn't an offense
to them. Sovereignty wasn't an affront
to them. Sovereignty was the very foundation upon which they
brought their prayers and petitions to the Lord God Most High. That's
a great doctrine, a great truth, a beloved thing that the church
ought to hold to, and care for, and defend. Now notice finally,
quickly, the escape of Abiathar, verses 20 to 23. Now one of the
sons of Ahimelech, the son of Ahitab, named Abiathar, escaped
and fled after David. So basically he escapes, he tells
David what occurs, and then David confesses, or David owns, or
David feels remorse and feels regret. Notice what David says
in verse 22. So David said to Abiathar, I
knew that day when Doeg the Edomite was there that he would surely
tell Saul, I have caused the death of all the persons of your
father's house. I don't know how David got up
the next day, to be honest with you. I really don't know how
David got up the next day. Have you ever done something
really bad and it just wants you, you just want to stop? I
don't mean kill yourself or go do that, but how did David move
on? Look what David ascribes to himself. I have caused this. I should
have known when I saw Doeg, the Edomite, standing in the house
of the Lord. I should have deflected. I should have stopped. I should
have taken him out, whatever the case may be, to neutralize
the threat of Doeg reporting back to Saul. David owns this. And yet David lived to fight
another day. You know how he does it? Because he understands there
is a fountain open for sin and uncleanness. He understands it's
the blood and the righteousness of Jesus upon which we stand. Brethren, learn something from
David. He continued to soldier on, even
when he had done grievous things. How, we might ask? Grace. Mercy. It wasn't his virtue that
he looked to. It wasn't his ability that he
looked to. It wasn't his power or strength that he looked to.
It was to the Lord God most high. When David is given the opportunity
later to be judged or punished, what does he do? He says, I'd
rather be in the hands of my God. Don't throw me into the
hands of men. I don't trust myself in their
clutches, but I'm good when it comes to God. Indulging out punishment. That's what David says. Now notice, as we end or conclude
the exposition. Verse 23, stay with me, do not
fear, for he who seeks my life seeks your life, but with me
you shall be safe. The contrast couldn't be sharper,
could it? Saul murders priests, David saves
them. Saul guts them in Gibeah and
their families in Nob through the agency of Doeg. But David says, stay with me,
I'll protect you. You see, David is the man after
God's own heart. David is the man who walks by
faith. David is the man who knows the
presence and the power of the Holy Spirit. Saul is a reprobate. Saul is the one that has rejected
the living and true God. David walks in his Lord. And we need to understand the
significance of this, because remember, at the end of chapter
19, The end of chapter 19, when Saul takes off his clothes and
he prophesies, when the Spirit comes upon him and he prophesies.
Remember when he took off his clothes there, he wasn't absolutely
naked. It was a divestment of his royal
robes. The author's telling us that
he's no longer God's king. What's the author telling us
here? Saul doesn't have access to the priesthood. Without access
to the priesthood, you don't have access to Yahweh. David
now has a priest. David now has Abiathar. David now has the prophet and
the priest, and he is the king. Abiathar then stands, this is
Davis, as a witness to the way God insistently preserves a remnant
of his people. The priests of God may be destroyed,
but not completely destroyed. The people of God may often be
put down, but never put out. Abiathar's escape does not mean
that all God's servants are immune from the world's butchery, but
that the world's butchery can never wipe out all of God's servants. The Lord does not promise that
we will never die for the kingdom of God, but the Lord promises
that the kingdom of God will never die. That's what Abiathar
shows us. Let Saul take his rage against
the priests of Nob, and the kingdom marches on. God will have a priest
over his household. Make no mistake about it. In
conclusion, my dear brothers and sisters, in the first place,
we learned that there will be enemies for God's covenant people. That was true in Saul's day.
It is true in our day. This is why we hear about, and
this is why we pray for the persecuted church. This is why we ought
to be concerned. We ought to show that solidarity
with brethren by going to the throne of grace on their behalf.
There will always be enemies to the Church of Christ. It is
a certainty. It'll never be the case. It's
the New Jerusalem wherein righteousness dwells. In this place, there's
a lot of unrighteousness, and a lot of that unrighteousness
is targeted against the people of Jesus. In the second place,
and I think we've shown this, we ought to appreciate the misery
of political tyranny. The misery of political tyranny. Now, it seems to me that in an
election cycle, there's two basic responses from the people of
God. On the one hand, you get that group that says, if we can
only elect the right guy, then everything's going to be great.
We can only elect the right guy, then everything's going to be
great. You've heard that, haven't you?
You don't look at me like, what are you talking about? Those
people are out there. Their websites are out there. You can click
on them and see. If we only elect the right people, everything
will be great. Make America great again. Restore chickens in every
pot, and cars in every driveway, and jobs. It's all this idea
that if we just elect the right guy, then everything's going
to be great. But then you get the other websites,
you get the other Christians who say, we shouldn't think one
whit about politics at all. We should just concentrate on
the church and do what the church is supposed to do. What are we
supposed to believe? How are we supposed to navigate?
Which websites do we visit? Well, the idea that salvation
and redemption can come from any man or political party is
patently false. The psalmist puts it this way,
some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we will remember
the name of the Lord our God. On the other hand, brethren,
political tyranny makes difficult the functioning of the Church
of Jesus Christ. It seems to me that Paul the
Apostle, as well he should, gives us the perfect response, the
biblical response. We don't put our trust in those
men, but we pray for those men. I know it seems so odd, doesn't
it? We need to recognize the dangers
of a political tyranny. Salvation cannot be gotten from
a man or political party. but a great deal of bloodshed
can be gotten by a man or a political party. So be savvy and recognize
these things and don't cast your ballot for Saul. That would be
foolish. That would genuinely make difficult
Paul's injunction in 1 Timothy 2. Why are we supposed to pray
for kings and all those who are in authority? So we'll have jobs. So we'll have whatever it is
that they're telling us we're going to have. That we may lead
a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence.
So on the one hand, don't trust in a man or a political party.
But on the other hand, don't disregard the ramifications of
a man or a political party. You vote in a Saul and life is
going to be very difficult. You vote in a Saul and things
are going to be very bloody. You vote in a Saul and things
are going to be very harsh and it's going to be very difficult.
Now, that's not to say we ought not to slug it through the difficulty,
but Paul's prayer seems to envision this sort of an environment so
that we can be unharassed and free to worship our God the way
we are supposed to. Doesn't that seem like The response. We need to understand as well
the preservation of the covenant people. It's been an encouragement
going through 1 Samuel because it underscores the power and
the ability and the super competence of Almighty God to preserve His
kingdom. Doesn't it? There's a lot of
threats coming against the kingdom. From without, that champion from
Gath named Goliath, and from within, that tyrant that was
a Benjamite son of Kish named Saul. It should promote confidence
for us and to us in the one who declared, and on this rock I
will build my church and the gates of Haiti shall not prevail
against it. If God is able to preserve his
kingdom in such tumultuous seasons as we see here in 1 Samuel and
through 2 Samuel and through the kings and all of those things,
if he is able to preserve it, then certainly when his son promises
in Matthew 16 that he will build his church and the gates of Hades
shall not prevail against it, we ought to say yea and amen
and we trust you Lord Jesus that even if we are under assault,
that even if the gutters run with blood, we nevertheless will
believe that Christ will maintain that for which he died. There's
a certain bit of comfort in that, isn't there? And then I think,
and I've alluded to this, that Abiathar points to us about God's
mind for keeping a priest over his house. If you want to write
this down later, this was another point of application. Study Psalm
52. Pastor Cam read it at the outset of worship. When did David
write Psalm 52? He wrote Psalm 52 when Doeg,
the Edomite, told Saul that David had been with the Himalek in
Nob. And that psalm breaks down into
three sections. The description of God's enemies,
the judgment against God's enemies, and the preservation of God's
people. It's good to reflect on David. Psalms, at the time,
are the ones that jive with these historical narratives. There's
a great world of comfort. David describes the enemies,
he tells of God's judgment against them, and then he rejoices in
the reality that God preserves his people. That final lesson
You may be a non-Christian here this morning. You may be an unbeliever.
You may be somebody who hasn't come to Christ. And I know if
you attend this church, you hear this every week. We pick on you.
We're really not. We're not trying to pick on you.
We don't know who you are. There's no sign. There's no bulb. There's no halo.
There's no black presence thereof. There's nothing that would indicate
one way or the other. But probably in your own heart
of hearts, you know if you've made peace with God through our
Lord Jesus Christ. In your heart of hearts, you
know that the life that you now live in the flesh is either that
ordained by God for his glory and your well-being, or that
which is a rejection of his will, which is a rebellion against
his mind as revealed in scripture, which is ultimately degradation
to yourself. You see, men think that liberty
comes in a bottle, or in a pill, or in a cigarette, or in a joint,
or whatever it may be, or in a political party, or in self-righteousness. That brings degradation, brings
emptiness, it brings confusion and chaos. Sin never produces
good things. But learn from this passage that
God has purpose to station a priest over his house. In 1 Samuel chapter
21 or 22, when the Antichrist Saul is trying to destroy the
very covenant people of God, God puts his hand upon Abiathar
and brings him to David. Now consider the fact that David
will later compose a psalm, and in that psalm he will write concerning
his greater son. The Lord, Yahweh, has sworn and
will not relent. You, Christ Jesus, are a priest
forever according to the order of Melchizedek. There is a priest
over the house of God today. There is one to whom you can
come in your guilt, in your sin, in your shame. There is one who
takes sinners like you, and who cleanses them, and who washes
them, and who purifies them, and who gives them a righteousness.
I mean, this is why it's called good news. You can't speak of
it without a smile, because you know this is what's happened.
We were degraded by sin. We were in our filth. We were
in that wickedness, and that mire, and that wretchedness.
And God came, and God cleansed, and God washed, and God gave
us the righteousness that is not our own, that is imputed
and received by faith alone. Believe on Him. Believe on this
priest, not Abiathar, the priest over the house of Nob in the
days of David and Saul. But believe on Jesus, of whom
Yahweh has sworn and will not relent, that He is a priest forever. He's not going away. This is
one of the apostles' arguments in Hebrews 7. You know what limited
the Levitical priesthood? They dropped dead. They died. They couldn't maintain it. Not
Jesus. The Apostle says he ever lives
to make intercession. He's always stationed at the
right hand of the Father. 1 John 2 tells us at the right
hand of God we have an advocate with the Father, even Jesus Christ
the righteous. Sinner today ought to be the
day of salvation. Believe on Jesus. Receive the
forgiveness of sins. Receive that righteousness that
avails with God wherein one day you will enter in. to that place
where there's no more political tyranny, where there's no more
bloodshed, where there is no more effects of the ravages of
sin. Doesn't it encourage you to read
chapters 21 and 22 of the book of Revelation and say with John
at the end, even so, come Lord Jesus. deliver us from this evil. Let us pray. Father, we thank
you for the word of truth. We thank you for your graciousness
and your mercy to us. We ask God in heaven that you'd
open ears and hearts to the truth of the gospel here and other
churches in Chilliwack and throughout Canada and all over the world.
We pray that your word would run swiftly and be glorified. We pray that multitudes would
come to the Father through the priest, Jesus Christ, by the
power of the Holy Spirit, that they might know the joys of being
found in him. We thank you for this time to
meet together, and we pray that you would go with us now. And
we ask through Christ the Lord, amen.