← Back to sermon library

The Unsurpassed Value of Scripture

Jim Butler · 2023-04-19 · 2 Timothy 3:16–17 · 9,490 words · 56 min

Chapter 3, 2 Timothy chapter 
3. So we're not starting Leviticus 
tonight. I need a bit more time in terms 
of background and just figuring out how to consolidate some of 
that material. So next Wednesday night we'll 
have a hymn sing, so April 26th. In the sanctuary, we'll have 
a hymn sing. We've done that before. And then, God willing, 
the following Wednesday, which will be May 3rd, we'll start 
Leviticus. So, if you've got friends and 
family and neighbors and loved ones that can't, you know, think 
of anything other than Leviticus, invite them to come on Wednesday 
night, because we should be there for a little while. People in 
the church today would say, Leviticus, what's that? It's interesting 
that Naphtali said those brothers didn't have a clue about the 
book of Judges. It's just interesting the way 
things are that way. But anyway, so 2 Timothy 3, our 
focus is on verses 16 and 17, the surpassing value of the word 
of God. You've heard this material before. 
I think it is encouraging though by way of review. and to remind 
us why we come here on Wednesday night, because we're here to 
study God's precious word. But I'll read it, read the chapter 
as a whole, and then as I said, our focus is on verses 16 and 
17. But know this, that in the last days perilous times will 
come, for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, 
boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, 
unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, 
brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of 
pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness 
but denying its power, and from such people turn away. For of 
this sort are those who creep into households and make captives 
of gullible women loaded down with sins, led away by various 
lusts, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge 
of the truth. Now as Janus and Jambres resisted Moses, so do 
these also resist the truth, men of corrupt minds, disapproved 
concerning the faith, but they will progress no further, for 
their folly will be manifest to all, as theirs also was. But you have carefully followed 
my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, long-suffering, 
love, perseverance, persecutions, afflictions, which happened to 
me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra, what persecutions I endured. And out of them all the Lord 
delivered me. Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ 
Jesus will suffer persecution. But evil men and imposters will 
grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. But you must 
continue in the things which you have learned and been assured 
of, knowing from whom you have learned them. and that from childhood you have 
known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for 
salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All Scripture 
is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, 
for reproof, for correction, for instruction and righteousness, 
that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every 
good work. Amen. Well, as we look at this particular 
chapter, there's an obvious contrast. You see what Paul warns Timothy 
against, and then you see what Paul demands or exhorts Timothy 
to be about. So in chapter 3, verses 1 to 
9, he describes the opposition. He describes those who are opposed 
to the church. This isn't the pagan this isn't 
the state, this isn't the commies, these are people that infiltrate 
the church and that at least profess faith in Jesus. You see 
that in verse 5, having a form of godliness but denying its 
power, and from such people turn away. So they'd be in the midst 
of the places where Timothy was, he was to avoid them. He then 
gives a brief description of their tactics and methodology 
in verses 6 to 9, but then in verse 10, again, that contrast. 
He encourages Timothy, you have carefully followed my doctrine, 
manner of life, purpose, faith, long-suffering love, perseverance. 
So you have not gone down that track. Avoid those who have gone 
down that track and continue to be faithful in following my 
example. And then he highlights once again, 
verse 13, evil men and imposters will grow worse and worse, deceiving 
and being deceived. And so then he exhorts Timothy, 
but you must continue in the things which you have learned 
and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them. 
And then he gives this great statement concerning the scriptures 
in verse 15. And that from childhood you have 
known the Holy Scripture. So he's talking specifically 
here about the Old Testament. When we get to verse 16 and he 
says, all scripture is given by inspiration of God, he means 
primarily the Old Testament. Now there will be letters having 
been written by this time and there were letters being circulated 
within the churches. So we'll look at that data in 
a moment. primary emphasis is on the scriptures of the Old 
Testament and then those apostolic letters that had been circulating. 
So 2 Timothy is the last letter that the Apostle Paul wrote, 
probably around 64. So he had already written all 
of his other letters, which were being circulated. The four gospel 
records were already written. Some date John later on into 
later than No, maybe in the mid-60s. They date Revelation late. My 
own personal view is that all the New Testament documents were 
completed prior to AD 70. But whatever the case, there 
were letters written, Matthew, Mark, Luke for sure, so those 
gospel records were being circulated, as was Acts. So Luke wrote the 
Book of Acts and the Gospel of Luke. They circulated together, 
those two documents. So when he says all scripture, 
he means the Old Testament and then those extant letters that 
had been making their way in the church. But back to verse 
15, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures 
which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which 
is in Christ Jesus. Which is a very incredible statement. 
Through the Old Testament you can come to saving faith in our 
Lord Jesus Christ. I don't think everybody that's 
ever professed faith in Jesus has absolutely believed that 
the Old Testament is sufficient to present Christ to a sinner 
such that that sinner can be saved, but that's what Paul says. And that's what Jesus says, for 
in them you think you may have everlasting life, eternal life, 
and these are they which testify of me. And so having referred 
to the Holy Scriptures, now he gives us this wonderful statement 
in verses 16 and 17 concerning the surpassing value of the Word 
of God. So I want to look first at the 
identity of Scripture, secondly the authority of Scripture, and 
then thirdly the utility of Scripture. And first, notice the identity. So he says all Scripture, or 
we could translate it every Scripture, whatever Scripture we have is 
what he's speaking about. So the Old Testament, as I said, 
is primarily in view. You see a lot of New Testament 
endorsement of the Old Testament. So it's not necessary, I think, 
to go through all the passages, but we have, say, for instance, 
in Luke 24, so beginning from Moses and the prophets, the Lord 
Jesus taught all things concerning himself from those particular 
passages. Every time you have in the New 
Testament, it is written, and there is an Old Testament reference. You see that the New Testament 
authors receive the Old Testament as the God-breathed Word. As 
Jews, those having come out of Old Covenant religion, they would 
have already esteemed, they would have already revered, and they 
would have already respected and received the Old Testament 
as the authoritative Word of God. So when he says all Scripture 
is given by inspiration of God, again I think everybody agrees 
in terms of the Old Testament, but we need to as well establish 
that he's speaking about the New Testament. And there's three 
things we ought to appreciate about the New Testament scripture. 
They were written by apostles, or apostolic men. If they weren't 
written specifically by apostles, in the case of Luke and Mark, 
they were directly under apostles. So Luke had a relationship with 
the apostle Paul, and Mark had a relationship with the apostle 
Peter. So when we say that they're apostolic writings, that means 
that the apostles were responsible for them, even if it were the 
case that a non-apostle had written them. But the apostles' role 
in the Church was, in fact, unique. When we look at, say, for instance, 
Ephesians chapter 4, as we've been moving through there, on 
our Sunday night services, Christ gave gifts to the church. And 
the first in that list is apostles. The apostles were on par with 
the prophets of the Old Testament. They were the men that said, 
thus saith the Lord. One theologian, a man by the 
name of Herman Ritterbos, said, for the communication and transmission 
of what was seen and heard in the fullness of time, Christ 
established a formal authority structure to be the source and 
standard for all future preaching of the gospel. From the beginning 
of his public ministry, we see Jesus' intent on sharing his 
own power with others so that this authority would take visible, 
tangible shape for the foundation and extension of the church on 
earth. In fact, you can turn back to 
the book of Ephesians to chapter 2 in particular. Chapter 2 at 
verse 20, having been built on the foundation of the apostles 
and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief cornerstone. 
So when we come to the documents of the New Testament, I think 
there's an approach to the Bible as a whole that is somewhat like 
the Koran. It's just a bunch of random things 
sort of thrown together and bound together in one place. But that's 
not the case with the scriptures. The scriptures have one author. 
The divine author is God. Now, he used about 40 different 
men to pen the actual words. But as we go on in this passage, 
those words were God-breathed. They're given by inspiration. 
So when we talk about divine authorship of Holy Scripture, 
we recognize that it's God. God gave us this Word. He used 
human instruments, but the human instruments recorded the Word 
that He would have for us. That's why it makes perfectly 
good sense to understand that all of the Bible helps us understand 
all the rest of the Bible. The best interpreter of Scripture 
is the Scripture itself. Where the Holy Spirit speaks 
in one place, we can compare in other places, and it helps 
to shine the light upon the various texts of Scripture. So the Apostles 
had a unique role within the context of the Church. You see 
that in Matthew chapter 10, Jesus selected the 12 Apostles, He 
gave them authority, He gave them power, and He gave them 
a commission. And then as time progressed, they wrote letters, 
and they circulated those letters among the churches. So the apostles 
had a particular role, and the apostles had a consciousness 
concerning the scripture itself. When we read, for instance, the 
apostle Paul, he understood that he was writing the word of God. 
He understood that what he was penning was, in fact, authoritative 
in the churches. If you turn back to 1 Corinthians, 
chapter 7, 1 Corinthians chapter 7, just a few passages in this 
regard. 1 Corinthians chapter 7, specifically 
at verse 12. He says, but to the rest, I, 
not the Lord, say, if any brother has a wife who does not believe 
and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her. 
Now, in terms of the particular language that he uses, but to 
the rest, I, not the Lord, he's not suggesting that what he describes 
in this particular context is less authoritative. It is as 
authoritative, it's in the letter that he pens under the inspiration 
of the Holy Spirit. The reason why he says, I command, 
not the Lord, because the Lord in his earthly ministry didn't 
deal with the issue of mixed marriages, and that's what he's 
dealing with in this particular context. So he's writing, as 
an authoritative representative of Jesus Christ, a letter that 
binds the people of God to obedience. As well, look at 1 Corinthians 
chapter 14. 1 Corinthians chapter 14, specifically at verses 37 
and 38. He says, If anyone thinks himself 
to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the 
things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord. 
But if anyone is ignorant, let him be ignorant. And then over 
in 1 John 1, we have John's testimony that he's an eyewitness, an eyewitness 
of the glory of Jesus Christ, and he's writing from that vantage 
point. In 1 John 1, that which was from 
the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with 
our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, 
concerning the word of life, the life was manifested, and 
we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you, that eternal 
life, which was with the Father, and was manifested to us. That 
which we have seen and heard, we declare to you, that you also 
may have fellowship with us. And truly, our fellowship is 
with the Father, and with His Son, Jesus Christ, and these 
things we write to you, that your joy may be full. This is 
the message which we have heard from him and declared to you 
that God is light and in him is no darkness at all. So the 
apostles had consciousness concerning scripture. And again, this is 
just a few passages. There's a lot. We're going to 
look at a few more as we move along. But consider this testimony 
from Justin Martyr. He was one of the early church 
fathers. He lived in AD 100 to AD 165. So if John the Apostle 
did make it to the 90s, he was dead by the time of Justin Martyr. 
So Justin Martyr writing at that early age says, for the apostles 
in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have 
thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them. You'll sort 
of get this report from outside of Christianity, and sometimes 
from fringe Christianity, that, you know, there was all these 
letters that were written by the early fathers, and why weren't 
they considered scripture? Well, those early fathers didn't 
see themselves as writing scripture. Those early fathers did not see 
themselves on par with the apostles. And intriguingly, with Justin 
Martyr, he knows that two of them were not written by apostles. 
He knows that Mark and Luke were not apostles, but they were apostolic 
men. They were under the authority 
of the apostles. Irenaeus lived in 8130 to 202. He says, we have learned from 
none others the plan of our salvation than from those through whom 
the gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim 
in public and at a later period by the will of God handed down 
to us in the scriptures to be the ground and pillar of our 
faith. So when you look at the data in the early church fathers, 
it is not the case that they thought they were on par with 
the apostles. They understood all too well 
that there was a demarcation between the apostolic era and 
these church fathers. And they revered those texts, 
they received those texts, and they respected those texts, and 
they treated them as scripture, as the authoritative word of 
God Most High. It wasn't the case that there 
was this great debate, and it was finally settled in the 300s, 
and all that sort of thing. No, it was pretty early on, especially 
with Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and then the Pauline epistles. There was not a lot of debate, 
and not a lot of difference of opinion. There were the odd heretics, 
there were men that did question the various books, or some of 
the books. There was a man in the second century by the name 
of Marcion, and Marcion liked Paul's epistles, but he wanted 
to change a few of them, and the only gospel record that he 
accepted was Luke. Well, Marcion was a heretic. 
He was outside of orthodoxy. The orthodox men, by and large, 
received the apostolic documents and writings. And while some 
of them were disputed later on, it was nevertheless the case 
that early on, this 27-book canon of the New Testament not forced 
itself upon the Church, but definitely evidenced itself as the Word 
of God. You'll often hear times of people 
saying about the canon or the rule of Scripture that the Church 
decided what was inscripturated. No, the Church discovered or 
the church recognized what was Scripture. And there's rationale 
for that. If you're interested, I would 
suggest come to the Confession Study in the next couple of weeks. 
We're going to be in Chapter 1, and I hope to deal a bit with 
canon or canonicity, because that's a very important topic. How do we know that the New Testament 
is what we're supposed to have? several years ago and probably 
it'll come back, you know, the lost book or the gospel of Thomas 
or the gospel of whoever, all these competitors, all these 
documents that are outside of the canon of scripture that some 
today suggest should be within scripture. Well, there's a criteria 
that was utilized to determine those books or to recognize those 
books that were in fact in the canon. It's a very fascinating 
study. But as well, it's a very simple study. It's not like the 
book of God fell out of heaven and it was just there and all 
these people discovered it. It was a very organic process. 
The Apostles were installed or ordained by Christ, they went 
out and preached, they went out and taught, they wrote down these 
things, they started sending these letters around the churches. 
The Apostle Paul, same sort of thing. When he's in his jail 
cell, what's he doing? He's not sort of just marking 
the the wall or lamenting his woes, but he's writing scripture. 
We call those the prison epistles. He writes Ephesians, he writes 
Philippians, he writes Colossians, he writes Philemon when he's 
in his first imprisonment. He's writing the Word of God, 
and he's conscious of the fact that he is writing the Word of 
God. So when it comes to the Apostle Paul, turn to 1 Thessalonians 
5. Let's confine ourselves specifically 
to his epistles at this point. Again, this applies to all of 
the apostles. We see it very obviously in Paul's 
treatment. Notice that Paul insisted in 
1 Thessalonians 5 at verse 27. Paul insisted that his letters 
be read in the churches. 1 Thessalonians 5.27, I charge 
you by the Lord that this epistle be read to all the holy brethren. Which is a big deal, right? What was read in the synagogue? What was read in the early church? 
It was the word of God. And then turn over to Colossians. 
Colossians chapter 4. Paul insisted that his letters 
be exchanged among the churches. Notice in Colossians 4 at verse 
16, when this epistle is read among you, see that it is read 
also in the church of the Laodiceans, and that you likewise read the 
epistle from Laodicea. Again, this is one of the marks 
of canonicity, circulation of the letters. It's not the case 
that there was just this one little group of churches that 
got this one little document and they became this one little 
Christian church. No, there was this circulation 
of the New Testament documents throughout the churches and they 
saw collectively what God had done in terms of these men. Paul 
insisted that his letters be obeyed. We already saw that in 
1 Corinthians 14 at verse 37, but turn to 2 Thessalonians chapter 
2. 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, specifically at verse 1. 2 Thessalonians 
2 at verse 15. Therefore, brethren, stand fast 
and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word 
or our epistle. Stand fast and hold the traditions 
which you were taught, whether by word or our epistle. In other 
words, obey. And then 3.14. 3.14. If anyone 
does not obey our word in this epistle, note that person and 
do not keep company with him that he may be ashamed. Now, 
if you read through the New Testament, and you read through what you 
can glean in terms of the life and ministry of the Apostle Paul, 
he doesn't come across as an egocentric guy. He doesn't come 
across as a sort of megalomaniac. He doesn't come across as this 
proud, arrogant wretch. No, he celebrates men preaching 
the truth even if they're doing it out of spite for him. He says 
that in Philippians chapter 1. So for a man that is humble, 
a man that is godly, a man that is lowly, a man that is self-effacing, 
for him to demand that people obey his letters And to demand 
that if somebody in a church does not obey his letters, then 
they should be disciplined or dealt with by the church indicates 
that he understands something about the nature of his writing. And then in 1 Corinthians chapter 
2, he knows specifically that his words are given by the Spirit. 
1 Corinthians chapter 2, specifically at verse 12. Now we have received 
not the spirit of the world, but the spirit who is from God, 
that we might know the things that have been freely given to 
us by God. These things we also speak, not 
in words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches, 
comparing spiritual things with spiritual. And then turn over 
to the book of 2 Peter. 2 Peter, just to sort of round 
out this study concerning Paul and his epistles, we'll get it 
from another party, even Peter the Apostle. Notice what Peter 
says in 2 Peter chapter 3, specifically at verses 14 to 16. 2 Peter 3, 
14, Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be diligent 
to be found by him in peace, without spot and blameless, and 
consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation, as 
also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given 
to him, has written to you. Now, our primary focus is on 
the next verse, but incidentally, this is one of the arguments 
for Pauline authorship of the book of Hebrews. Because Peter 
is writing to Jewish believers. And so he says, as also our beloved 
brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written 
to you. Who's that? Hebrew believers, 
Jewish believers. But then notice his statement 
in verse 16. as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of 
these things, in which are some things hard to understand." There's 
a doctrine called the perspicuity of scripture, which means it's 
clarity. And under perspicuity of scripture, 
it means that those things necessary for our understanding of who 
God is and the way of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus 
is clear. It's absolutely crystal clear. 
But there is some difficulty in the scripture. Just because 
we know justification by grace through faith alone, doesn't 
necessarily mean our eschatology is airtight. So there's some 
things that are tough to understand. And so Peter acknowledges that. 
As also in all his epistles, speaking of these things, in 
which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and 
unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also 
the rest of the scriptures. So he equates Paul's epistles 
with the rest of the scriptures. That if you distort them or you 
twist them, you do so to your own destruction. As well, turn 
to 1 Timothy chapter 5. 1 Timothy chapter 5. Again, just establishing that 
what we have in the New Testament wasn't some hippies that kind 
of got inspired and wrote some poems and sort of threw it all 
together in a book and here we have it now and we call it the 
Word of God. No, they were conscious that what they were doing was, 
in fact, unique. They were conscious that what 
they were doing was, in fact, from God. Notice in 1 Timothy 
5, specifically at verse 17, to begin, Now, as Paul often 
does, he goes to the Scripture to confirm, affirm, and corroborate 
the particular exhortation that he gives. So in verse 18 he goes to the 
scripture. For the scripture says, you shall not muzzle an 
ox while it treads out the grain, and the laborer is worthy of 
his wages. Now he quotes from Deuteronomy 
and he quotes from Luke 10 under the heading of scripture. So 
just as Deuteronomy is binding upon the people of God, so is 
Luke's gospel binding on the people of God. The scripture 
says you shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain 
and the laborer is worthy of his wages. And then one final 
passage in 2 Peter chapter 1. 2 Peter chapter 1. When I say 1 
finally, I mean in our study tonight. Again, there's lots 
more texts in scripture that indicate that they knew what 
they were doing. 2 Peter chapter 1, verses 19 
to 21, a familiar passage. And so we have the prophetic 
word confirmed, which you do well to heed as a light that 
shines in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning 
star rises in your hearts. So we have the reality that Paul's 
letters were written according to the wisdom given to him, The letters were written in the 
category of divinely inspired scripture, and they carry eternal 
consequence. To distort them, or to disagree 
with them, or to disobey them brings you into the place of 
chastisement or perhaps judgment. So the unique role of the apostles 
within the context of the local church, or in the first century 
church, he understood that all scripture is given by inspiration 
of God. Certainly Genesis to Malachi, 
but certainly these apostolic documents that were being written, 
again, by the time he writes 2 Timothy, many of them had been 
completed, many of them had been circulating among the churches, 
they had been received and the people of God were being edified. 
So when we go back to 2 Timothy 3.16, we see all scripture. That's the identity. Then comes 
the authority. Notice it says, is given by inspiration 
of God. And the word here is literally, 
literally God breathed. God breathed. It's breathed out 
by God Most High. And when it comes to the doctrine 
of inspiration, it's not like a poet who goes up on Mount Sham 
and gets inspired and writes a lovely poem about the beauty 
that he witnesses. That's not what inspiration means 
when we talk about it in terms of apostolic ministry and writing 
letters to the churches. Inspiration means that God breathed 
through them. So whatever Paul wrote, whatever 
John wrote, whatever James wrote, whatever Peter wrote, whatever 
Isaiah writes, whatever Moses writes, those are God's words. But it doesn't violate Moses, 
or Jeremiah, or John, or James, or Peter. It's an intriguing 
thing. We refer to it as the doctrine of organic inspiration. 
So God leaves the men intact. They write in their own style. 
Paul's style is not John's style. There's a difference between 
Romans 6 and 1 John 1 in terms of writing and grammar and syntax 
and structure and all that sort of thing. So he doesn't violate 
those men in terms of, you know, they're all going to produce 
the same sort of a product. James, for instance. I think 
James has a lot of the ministry of the gospel record in his writing. There seems to be a lot of sort 
of Proverbs, Matthew. There's just things in there 
that are different than, again, say, how John writes or how Peter 
writes. So God in His infinite wisdom 
uses those men. He doesn't violate those men 
or make those men something other, but through those men, those 
men write the very word of God Almighty. It is the most beautiful 
and excellent expression of God's ability and demonstration of 
His power. So the word literally means God 
breathed. And it doesn't mean that Paul 
himself was inspired. So if Paul goes down to the local 
market and he orders some meat, that's not inspiration. He's not inspired when he's sort 
of walking through the Agora and he's looking at things. He's 
inspired as he takes pen to paper and as he writes the letters 
that God had intended for him to write. So it doesn't mean 
they're inspired men the way that a poet is. It doesn't mean 
they're inspired men that whatever they say is the word of God. No, it's whatever they write, 
when they're writing the word of God, that's the word of God. 
So there's some things, some qualifications to make sure that 
we understand there. So, when it says that all scripture 
is given by inspiration of God, this underscores, obviously, 
the origin comes from God, and thus the authority. If it comes 
from God, then it's definitely authoritative. Our confession 
says in chapter 1, paragraph 4, the authority of scripture, 
for which it ought to be believed, depends not upon the testimony 
of any man or church. but holy upon God who is truth 
itself, the author thereof, and therefore it is to be received 
because it is the word of God." So it doesn't depend on what 
the church said. The church recognized that. But 
it was the fact that these letters bear the very mark of God upon 
them that, again, not forced themselves upon the churches, 
but certainly made it obvious that these were, in fact, documents 
to be received by the churches that came from the apostles that 
Jesus authorized, that Jesus appointed for that very task. 
So when Jesus picks these 12 men, Jesus knows that He's training 
them, that they're going to be the ones that go out and preach 
after His ascension, and they're going to be the guys that write 
these letters to the churches. And so He does this according 
to His plan and purpose, so that they pen the Word of God Most 
High, so that we're not left in this world on our own. We've 
got the Old and we've got the New Testaments. All Scripture 
is given by inspiration of God. So when you think about scripture, 
we think about, say, the attributes of God. God is spirit, he's infinite, 
he's eternal, unchangeable, he's being, wisdom, power, holiness, 
justice, goodness, and truth. I think there's three attributes 
of scripture that are very helpful for us to remember. First, inspired. And again, God-breed, given by 
inspiration of God. Then, infallible. and then inerrant. So inerrant means that the Bible 
doesn't lie. Infallible means that the Bible 
cannot lie. Now, within the last, I'd say, 
50, 60, 70 years, well, the last 100 years, there was a big debate 
about inerrancy. Some would say, well, we don't 
need to maintain inerrancy. It doesn't matter if there's 
actually errors in the Bible, because it's the truth of the 
words and whatever and the feelings and, you know, the existential 
connection that we get. Well, no. It needs to be true. Who's the arbiter? If this is 
not correct, then maybe Jesus' resurrection is not correct. 
So inerrancy is something that the conservatives over the last 
hundred years have battled hard for. Well, of course, people 
look back at the confession and they say, well, it doesn't use 
inerrant, but it uses infallible. If a document is infallible, 
which means it cannot lie, then it's inerrant, meaning it does 
not lie. The one contains the other. And 
so the confessions, the 17th century confessions, call the 
scriptures infallible. For our own modern use, we need 
to also parse it down to inerrant. The scriptures are trustworthy 
in all that they affirm concerning history, science, doctrine, ethics, 
religious practice, or any other topic. That's a very necessary 
emphasis in our day because inerrancy has been challenged over the 
last hundred years. So inspired, infallible, inerrant. I think those are three good 
I's for you to remember in terms of scripture. So that's the identity 
of Scripture, that's the authority of Scripture. Then notice that 
Paul speaks concerning the utility or usefulness of Scripture, or 
profitability of Scripture. And he gives a general statement, 
and then he gives a specific statement. Notice the general 
statement. All scripture is given by inspiration 
of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, 
and for instruction in righteousness. So there's your sort of general 
utility with reference to the Word of God. And then the specific 
utility is in verse 17, that the man of God may be complete, 
thoroughly equipped for every good work. So it has particular 
reference to the man that's in the trenches preaching and teaching 
the Word of God. But in terms of general usefulness 
with reference to the Bible, we see that it's profitable for 
doctrine, reproof, correction, and for instruction in righteousness. Now just to parse this out a 
little bit, in terms of doctrine, this was the focus of Timothy's 
ministry. Look at 1 Timothy chapter 4. 
1 Timothy chapter 4, specifically at verse 6. If you instruct the brethren 
in these things, you will be a good minister of Jesus Christ, 
nourished in the words of faith and of the good doctrine which 
you have carefully followed." Notice in 4.13, "'Til I come, 
give attention to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine." Now 
that's in the context of public worship. So when it comes to 
public worship, read the Bible, exhort from the Bible, and teach 
the doctrine of the Bible. Notice in 2 Timothy 2.2, 2 Timothy 
2.2, this is a ministry and a duty of the church of the Lord Jesus 
Christ. The things that you have heard from me among many witnesses, 
commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others 
also. So the church is to find faithful men within her ranks 
and teach them, commit them to them so that they may teach others 
also. So doctrine is primary. Notice in 2 Timothy 2, 14-16, 
So shun this, but devote yourself to that, and understand that it's 
the Word of God that the people of God ultimately need to hear. Notice in 225, in humility, correcting 
those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them 
repentance so that they may know the truth. And then in 4.2, last 
statement in terms of a command that Paul gives to the church. He gives Timothy some specific 
commands in verses 9 and following, but the last corporate command 
of the apostle Paul is 2 Timothy 4.2. Preach the word, be ready 
in season and out of season, convince, rebuke, exhort with 
all longsuffering and teaching. So, with reference to doctrine, 
this was to be the focus of Timothy's ministry. And I love John Murray's 
statement concerning doctrine. He says, doctrine concerns the 
whole range of thought respecting God, the world, man, man's paramount 
interests, his destiny. If doctrine is to us cold, dead, 
and lifeless, then there are only two alternatives. Either 
our doctrine is not of Scripture, or we ourselves are cold and 
lifeless. We do nothing properly without 
thought, and we think nothing aright except as we think the 
truth of Him who is the King Eternal, Immortal, Invisible, 
the only God. Lack of biblical doctrine is 
lack of interest in God and His will for us, and this is godlessness." 
I think that's a powerful statement. Now, many of you, several of 
you, some of you, I don't know what the actual demographics 
are, come out of a reformed background, but those in the non-reformed 
world would have heard, doctrine divides. Why do we need doctrine? It's not that big of a deal. 
Just let's love Jesus. In the broader evangelical and 
less than stellar evangelicalism, there's this emphasis on loving 
Jesus and loving one another, but we don't want all that dry, 
dusty doctrine. Well, how do you navigate when 
the apostle says it's profitable for doctrine? It's an absolute 
must that the church is indoctrinated by the word of God so that we 
can think God's thoughts after him. But he goes on, it's profitable 
for doctrine and then he says for reproof. Now the scripture 
is profitable to reproof or rebuke wrong behavior in the people 
of God. And we shouldn't shy away from this. This is one of 
the purposes for it. You know, we say, oh, I don't 
want to read the Bible because I feel bad after. Well, I mean, 
I don't know what to tell you. Maybe just repent and then you'll 
feel good, right? Or I don't want to go to that 
church because all we ever hear is how bad we are. That's not 
good. It shouldn't only ever be how 
bad we are, but we do need to hear about sin. And so the scripture 
is profitable to rebuke or reprove wrong behavior in the people 
of God. But glance over to Titus 1 as 
well. The scripture is profitable to 
expose the errors of false teachers. Notice in Titus 1.9, holding 
fast the faithful word as he has been taught that he may be 
able by sound doctrine both to exhort and convict those who 
contradict. So there is a reproving nature 
or a reproving point to the scriptures, and it's profitable for that. 
And so there's this emphasis, we receive doctrine, we learn 
the teaching of Holy Scripture, there's also this reproof that 
comes as well. When we learn And when we're 
shown and when it's demonstrated to us in the Scripture, whether 
we're reading it by ourselves, or somebody else is reading it 
to us, or we're sitting under preaching, that's a good thing. 
It's not a bad thing. We should want to be reproved 
and rebuked. And then comes correction. So 
we've got this utility. It teaches us, it reproves us, 
and then as well, it corrects us. It doesn't leave us bleeding 
and battered and bruised, but it provides the remedy, and it 
provides the way of recourse, and it provides the way of redress. And so that's a blessed thing. 
The scripture is profitable in setting persons on the right 
track with reference to belief and conduct. It not only exposes 
heresy and ungodly conduct, but it also prescribes the right 
path. And if you're thinking biblically, and you're thinking 
properly, this passage of scripture ought to be foundational when 
it comes to church life. I mean, if you're going to pick 
a church where they've got the best entertainment, and they've 
got the best coffee, and they've got a great latte, and they've 
just got such upbeat music, and it's so positive. Okay, but can 
the guy preach? When all is said and done, it's 
all Scripture is given by inspiration of God. All Scripture is profitable 
for doctrine, for reproof, for correction. And then notice, 
for instruction in righteousness, the Scripture is profitable for 
instructing God's children in the way that they should go. 
In fact, Psalm 119.9, how can a young man cleanse his way? 
By taking heed according to your word. If we do not appropriate 
the Word of God and use it in the manner that God specifies, 
we're not going to be healthy, vital people of God. If we're 
not getting the doctrine, if we're not experiencing the reproof, 
if we're not receiving the correction, if we're not being instructed 
in righteousness, guess what? We're going to be stagnant. We're 
going to be, you know, non-mobile. We're going to just be spinning 
our wheels. If you turn to the book of Hebrews, 
Hebrews chapter 5. Hebrews chapter 5. He describes 
sort of sluggishness, and we need to appreciate that he's 
not describing this in a positive way. So notice in Hebrews 5 at 
verse 12, he says, For though by this time you ought to be 
teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles 
of the oracles of God. And you have come to need milk 
and not solid food. For everyone who partakes only 
of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a 
babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, 
that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised 
to discern both good and evil. He's not commending them for 
this. He's not saying that this is 
a good thing. He's reproving them. He's saying 
that you should be further along now. You should have made some 
gains. There should have been some movement 
forward in terms of progress in the Christian faith. It's 
sort of like an exercise program. It's like anything we set our 
minds to. We start off in mathematics with 
with 2 plus 2, and that's great for when we're, I don't know, 
how old are you when you learn 2 plus 2? Probably pretty young. Very young. What, 5? 3? 2? 1? 
I don't know. It's been a long time since I 
had kids that age. When do they know 2 plus 2? But 
if they're 22 and that's all they're knowing, You're probably 
going to say, look man, get up off the couch, stop playing Nintendo, 
and learn some more. You've become stagnant. That's not a good thing. So the 
author of Hebrews, Paul the Apostle, exhorting these people, you're 
stagnant. If you're back in 2 Timothy 3, 
jump back up in the context to verse 6. Notice, for of this 
sort are those who creep into households and make captives 
of gullible women loaded down with sins, led away by various 
lusts. Look at this next phrase, always 
learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 
I've met those people in my life. Not here, I'm not saying, you 
know, outing anybody in our church, but you meet these people that 
they've been Christians for 20, 30, 40 years. They still don't 
know basic Bible truth. They don't know basic doctrinal 
truth. They couldn't define for you 
justification. And I'm not looking for Westminster 
Shorter Catechism number 33, but something in the ballpark, 
something that resembles the doctrine. I know that this was 
big with Ligonier. I don't know if it's still something 
they do, but they used to go to these Christian conferences, 
and they'd stand outside, ask the Christians basic questions, 
and they wouldn't get anywhere near a decent answer. Now these are people that are 
going to conferences and coming out of conferences that you would 
expect are probably the people that invest a little more time 
and perhaps money and effort and whatever in sort of appropriating 
the Christian faith. You've got a handful of guys 
out there from Sproul's group saying, hey, what's justification? 
Again, that's not, this isn't the, you know, splitting the 
atom in terms of theology. That's not, are you supralapsarian 
or infralapsarian? Can you explain, you know, the 
intricacies of an amillennial eschatol? We're not talking about 
that. How's a man saved? So when we come to passages like 
these that tell us how important the Bible is, I think that a 
necessary or logical implication of that shows us how important 
the Bible ought to be in the life of the church. If the Bible 
is foundational in terms of faith and practice, then the Bible 
needs to be foundational in terms of a particular church. And so 
we look at churches, we use those marks in the Belgic Confession, 
Word of God, discipline, sacraments, those are a great three-fold 
grid. But it all hinges on that Word 
of God. If that Word of God is not being utilized, if it's not 
being preached, if it's not being taught, if there's no reproof, 
no correction, no instruction in righteousness, then there 
is a deficiency. And so I think that this is a 
defining text, not only for our Christian life, but for church 
life, for everything that affects faith and practice. And then 
in terms of, back to the Psalm 119. So Psalm 119.9, how can 
a young man cleanse his way? By taking heed according to your 
word. Psalm 119.105, your word is a lamp to my feet and a light 
to my path. Psalm 119, 130, the entrance 
of your words gives light. It gives understanding to the 
simple. Psalm 119, 133, direct my steps 
by your word and let no iniquity have dominion over me. John 17, 
17, sanctify them by your truth. Your word is truth. So, you know, 
in the history of the Church, it's typically those persons 
that utilize the Word of God that are healthy, that are vibrant, 
that are diligent, that are faithful. I'm not suggesting that the person 
that hasn't memorized all Scripture, I'm not saying they're not Christians. 
There ought to be that impetus in all of us to grow in the grace 
and knowledge of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to get 
the doctrine, to get the reproof, to get the correction, and the 
instruction in righteousness. And then the particular prophet 
is for the man of God, in verse 17, that the man of God may be 
complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. It's not 
his leadership training, but ultimately scripture that completes 
the man of God. It's not his likability, but 
it's ultimately scripture that completes the man of God. It's 
not his charismata, but scripture that completes the man of God. 
It's the scripture that is definitional in terms of the man of God. and 
that he may be equipped for every good work. George Knight comments 
on this text, since God created Christians for good works and 
calls on them to do good works, he has given scripture to instruct 
them so that they may know in principle what God expects of 
them and thus be equipped to do that particular good deed 
called for in each situation. So, in conclusion, you've got 
a very glorious statement here concerning the Old and the New 
Testaments. You've got a wonderful statement 
concerning the authority, or origin and authority, of that 
Scripture, and then the profitability of that Scripture. And so this 
is why, God willing, we do what we do on Wednesday nights in 
terms of studying Scripture, and on Sunday in terms of preaching 
Scripture. Now, in terms of one final sort 
of observation, turn back to Psalm 119. You've heard this 
before as well. I think it's a wonderful model 
in terms of the way we approach the Bible. or the way we should 
approach the Bible. So you've got that statement 
in Psalm 119, how can a young man cleanse his way? And then 
you've got the answer, by taking heed according to your word. So we see that in the first place, 
the man of God, in this case, probably not the pastor, he's 
just a man of God, a woman of God, a person of God, whatever 
we're calling people these days, how can a person cleanse his 
way by taking heed according to your word? I think that refers 
to justification and sanctification. So how can a young man cleanse 
his way? It obviously assumes that the 
young man's way stands in need of cleansing. He needs to come 
to the Savior. He needs to believe the gospel. 
He needs to come to Jesus Christ and be saved. But then the life 
of sanctification. How does that young man continue 
to cleanse his way? He continues to cleanse his way 
through the use of the means of grace, through the Word of 
God Most High. Fax Spurgeon says, let him become 
a practical disciple of the Holy God, who alone can teach him 
how to overcome the world, the flesh, and the devil, that trinity 
of defilers by whom many a hopeful life has been spoiled. He is 
young and unaccustomed to the road. Let him not be ashamed 
often to inquire of Him who is so ready and so able to instruct 
him in it. I remember reading Spurgeon elsewhere, 
and he was talking about the Bible, and he was talking about 
how, you know, if there's a difficulty that you come to in the scripture, 
a lot of people, I think, well, I just don't know. I'm not going 
to worry about it. You can pray. You can ask God. 
And he uses the illustration. If you were reading a book that 
your next-door neighbor had written, and you came to a passage that 
you didn't understand, you'd probably walk over to your next-door 
neighbor's door and knock on it and say, well, what did you 
mean right there? So he says, you can pray. You may not get 
an immediate answer, but certainly it's a good means to pursue in 
terms of understanding the Word of God. So this young man obeys 
the Word, but notice he engages the Word with a whole heart. 
Verse 10, with my whole heart I have sought you. Oh, let me 
not wander from your commandments. Brethren, I understand that it's 
not always the case that our whole heart is engaged in the 
act of reading or in the act of preaching. This is another 
good thing for us to pray. God, help me by your grace to 
engage my whole heart to seek you. And certainly let me not 
wander from your commandments. Notice as well, he memorizes 
the word. Verse 11, your word I have hidden 
in my heart that I might not sin against you. Phone Bibles 
are great, but Phone Bibles typically don't help you to memorize scripture. 
My wife, Rebecca, and I were just musing the other day. You 
used to memorize phone numbers, didn't you? I did. I used to 
have phone numbers memorized. I don't memorize anybody's phone 
number now. I mean, I think I know... I don't know yours. I don't know 
yours. I still think I know Josh and 
Brittany's because they've had their number longer. But we used 
to memorize, right? When something's that accessible 
and that available, the tendency might be, well, I've got my phone, 
or I've got my computer, or I've got my Bible near. Well, memorizing 
scripture is more than just being able to recite it for, you know, 
points. Your word I've hidden in my heart 
that I might not sin against you. There's a very good thing 
about memorizing scripture. It's, you know, the Romans 12 
thing. but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. So 
don't be conformed to this world. Okay, great. I don't want to 
be conformed to this world. I won't watch their filth. I 
won't participate in their garbage. Now what? But be transformed 
by the renewing of your mind. We saw that on Sunday night. 
There's in sanctification a put on and a put off ethic. Put off 
the bad, put on the good. Don't steal anymore, but get 
a good job and make enough money so that you can give it to others. 
Don't lie, but rather speak truth. So there's the put off and the 
put on. So put off the bad in terms of the world, don't be 
conformed to it, but rather be transformed by the renewing of 
your mind. And scripture memory is a wonderful thing. It seems 
to be a lost art. I think that going back a few 
years, it seemed like more people were memorizing scripture. condemning, 
judging, I'm just suggesting this is a good practice in terms 
of, you know, helping us in our lives. A person struggles with, 
you know, sins of the flesh. 2 Peter, or 1 Peter chapter 2, 
abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul. It's always 
seemed to me to be a good text to have ready in the mind to 
try to combat those particular sorts of things or the various 
temptations. If you're tempted to steal, memorize 
the 8th commandment and that's not a tough one really. So it's 
flushing out the bad, putting in the good. And then notice 
as well, he depends upon divine instruction from the word. From 
the word in verse 12. Blessed are you, O Lord, teach 
me your statutes. Again, Spurgeon says, young man, 
the Bible must be your chart and you must exercise great watchfulness 
that your way may be according to its directions. You must take 
heed to your daily life as well as study your Bible. And you 
must study your Bible that you may take heed to your daily life. 
With the greatest care, a man will go astray if his map misleads 
him. But with the most accurate map, he will still lose his road 
if he does not take heed to it. The narrow way was never hit 
upon by chance. Neither did any heedless man 
ever lead a holy life. Spurgeon's comments on the Psalms 
is fantastic. It's online, you can find it, 
Treasury of David. Very good stuff in this section 
on the young man keeping his way pure. And then notice, he 
engages the word with a desire to declare it to others. Verse 
13, "...with my lips I have declared all the judgments of your mouth." 
He doesn't just internalize it, but he also publicizes it. He 
tells others. When we are conquered by God's 
grace, there is that desire for us to tell others of God's grace. 
Notice that he engages the word with joy. Verse 14, I have rejoiced 
in the way of your testimonies as much as in all riches. So 
he uses a very obvious illustration, as much as in all riches. If 
you found a bag of money, you'd certainly be happy. I'd be happy 
if I found a bag of money. Actually, I wouldn't. I'd think, 
man, they're going to come and get me. I'm going to, you know, whatever. 
But we actually had a family here that did find a bag of money. 
They're not with us anymore, and they ended up getting it. 
They found lots of money. turned it in and got returned 
to them, so what a blessing. But the psalmist uses that by 
way of analogy. I have rejoiced in the way of 
your testimonies as much as in all riches. And then notice he 
engages the word with meditation and contemplation. In verse 15, 
I will meditate on your precepts and contemplate your ways. Another 
helpful thing about memorization. You got the word memorized. You're 
able then meditate upon it. You're able then to contemplate 
it. Meditation in the Christian realm is not disengaging the 
mind. It's not Eastern meditation where 
you just go chant or hum and sit in the lotus position. But 
rather you are engaging your mind upon the Holy Scripture. You're thinking through it. You're 
contemplating it. You're rolling it about. And 
then finally he engages the word with delight and determination 
in verse 16. I will delight myself in your 
statues. There's the delight. And then 
notice the determination. I will not forget your word. 
He says several things along the way in Psalm 119 that are 
pretty powerful. I will not. He is purposeful. He is determined. He is resolute 
that he's not going to compromise his position before a thrice 
holy God. So just some hopeful, hopefully 
helpful encouragement from the young man in Psalm 119. Well 
I'll close in prayer and if there's any questions we can take those. 
Father in heaven, we thank you for your word. We thank you for 
its profitability. We have tried and proven it and 
known it to be the case in our own hearts and lives. And we 
thank you for that word. We thank you for Genesis to Revelation, 
for what it reveals to us concerning your power and your glory and 
your plan and purpose of salvation through your son, the Lord Jesus 
Christ. Thank you again for making us participants by your grace. We pray that you would help us 
to honor you and to serve and to glorify your great and awesome 
name. And we pray this through Jesus Christ, our Lord,