← Back to sermon library

CTF 2025: Timeline of Classical Theism

Jim Butler · 2024-12-20 · 748 words · 6 min

CTF 2025 - Preview

Summary

Other

The doctrine of God confessed in the Reformed Baptist confession stands in unbroken continuity with the creedal tradition of the early church and medieval theologians, and must be reclaimed against the departures of the modern era.

This conference preview traces the historical continuity of classical theism and Trinitarian doctrine from the early church through the medieval theologians and the Reformed confessions, up to the present day. The Second London Baptist Confession's Chapter 2 — 'Of God and the Holy Trinity' — stands in full solidarity with the Westminster Confession, the Savoy Declaration, and the Belgic Confession on the doctrine of God, all of which drew on Nicaea and Chalcedon rather than doing original theological work. Significant departures from this received tradition emerged only in the twentieth century. The conference aims to demonstrate that historical solidarity and to reclaim a doctrine of God that has fallen on hard times in the modern era.

Key quotes

It used to be called Christianity. We call it classical theism, but it used to simply be Christianity.
We take this doctrine of God and we make a pilgrimage into the past, and we see father after father, confessor after confessor, shaking hands with us and demonstrating that this is the doctrine of Christ's church.
We have no itch to clog religion with new words.

Applications

  1. Reclaim the historic doctrine of God by studying the creedal and confessional tradition that stretches from Nicaea through the Reformed confessions.
  2. Resist the novelties of modern departures from classical theism, recognizing that the received theological heritage is not a sectarian innovation but the common possession of Christ's church across the centuries.
  3. Read Chapter 2 of the confession in light of its patristic and creedal backdrop, understanding that the confessionalists were inheritors rather than inventors of this doctrine.

Questions this sermon answers

Do the Reformed confessions agree with each other on the doctrine of God?

Yes — the Westminster Confession, the Savoy Declaration, the Second London Baptist Confession, and the Belgic Confession all stand in full solidarity on the divine perfections and the Trinity; there is no meaningful divergence among them on Chapter 2.

Did the Reformers invent the doctrine of the Trinity as confessed in their confessions?

No — the confessionalists reached back into the historic church and took the best creedal expressions already formulated, with Chapter 2 reflecting the backdrop of Nicaea and Chapter 8 reflecting Chalcedon.

When did the church begin to depart from classical theism?

Significant departure from the historic doctrine of God emerged in the twentieth century and has continued into the twenty-first, though the tradition itself stretches unbroken from the early church fathers through the medieval theologians and the Reformation.

Why is the term 'classical theism' used instead of just 'Christianity'?

The speaker notes that what is now called classical theism was once simply called Christianity; the label became necessary only to distinguish the received tradition from modern departures.

Timeline of Classical Theism

That's a great segue into the next question I have here. So, about building bridges in the Reformed world, but really thinking of Chapter 2, which is titled, Of God and the Holy Trinity. Can you trace out the development of triune thought? in classical theism from year zero to now, and try to highlight if any church groups are moved away and how it got back, or if it's more a common shared heritage. Just speak to that a little between our confession, the other confessions, and potentially broader into the broader church world to highlight distinction and unity of chapter two.

Wow. All right. That is a big question. Tracing the history of Trinitarian thought from year zero and moving forward.

Well, I think maybe just first, if we work backwards, the question about Chapter 2, across the confessions that you mentioned at the beginning here, so the Westminster, the Savoy, the Second London, the Belgic, and other Reformed confessions, historically there is a significant measure of solidarity at the point of the doctrine of God. The subject matter of Chapter 2, the divine perfections, and then the triune reality of our blessed God. So there is nothing but solidarity at the point of that chapter on the Reformed confessions. You know, in our modern day, there have been some deviations from historical classical theism.

We're seeing it considerably. But at the time of the writing of these confessions, there was a solidarity across Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Baptists. And, you know, one of the things that we're trying to do with the conference, especially given the fact that it is on chapter 2, is to demonstrate that historical solidarity and, in a sense, to reclaim that doctrine of God that seems to have been fallen on hard times in our modern era. Yeah, and

Patristic and Medieval Inheritance

tracing it back from year zero going to our day, this is what the early church fathers taught. This is what the best medieval theologians taught. Certainly our Reformed confessions, they didn't do brand new work on chapter 2 or chapter 8 of Christ the Mediator. They reached back into the historical church and took the best creedal expressions of the that doctrine of God and the Holy Trinity.

So, for instance, in chapter 2, you see the backdrop of Nicaea as you work through there. Chapter 8, you see the backdrop of Chalcedon. So, when it comes to the Reformed confessions, We appreciate that those brothers stood on the shoulders of men that had gone before them. Now, that doesn't mean we agree with every jot and tittle of everything that every church father or every medieval theologian taught, but in those things most surely believed among us, vis-a-vis the doctrine of the Trinity, there has been a consistent expression of good theology in the life and context of the church.

And so, that's one of the main things that we want to call attention to and just to show that unity that we have. Again, differences, to be sure. variations in the tradition to some degree or other with reference to peripheral things. But when it comes to the doctrine of God, there's been a consistent exegetical tradition. We call that today, or it's been called today classical theism. some take exception with that term, whatever you want to call it.

However, the Scriptures articulate the doctrine of the Trinity, and then the Church, as gifts given by the ascended Christ, has theologized on Scripture and produced her creeds and confessions. We see that right up until the 20th century when there was some significant departure, and certainly that's carried through to today in the 21st century.

Classical Theism and Modern Departure

It used to be called Christianity. We call it classical theism, but it used to simply be Christianity. One of the phrases in the introduction to our confession of faith is,

Confessions as Received Heritage

we have no itch to clog religion with new words. And so, as Jim said, the confessionalists, those who frame these confessions, they are faithfully expressing what the Scriptures teach regarding these subjects, but they're also demonstrating that they are the inheritors of a received theological heritage. Spurgeon said something like, we take this doctrine of God and we make a pilgrimage into the past, And we see father after father, confessor after confessor, shaking hands with us and demonstrating that this is the doctrine of Christ's church. And that's what we're trying to express, to uphold, and to encourage with these conferences.

Study notes

Confessions & catechisms

  • 1689 LBCF 2
  • 1689 LBCF 8
  • Belgic Confession 1
  • Westminster Confession 2

Theological terms

  • Chalcedon
  • Classical Theism×4
  • Creeds and Confessions×2
  • Divine Perfections
  • Nicaea
  • Trinity×4

People cited

  • Charles Spurgeon