← Back to sermon library
All right, you can turn in your
Bibles to Deuteronomy chapter 5, as we continue to work through
the Ten Commandments. We're in the Second Commandment,
so verses 8 to 11. It's good to read the section,
though, so I'll start reading in Deuteronomy chapter 5 at verse
1. Remember, this is the longest
of the exhortations, beginning here in chapter 5. and continuing
all the way to chapter 26, so Moses exhorting the people of
God on the plains of Moab prior to their entrance into the promised
land and so this emphasis in chapters 5 to 26 is on covenant
loyalty, the faithfulness and fidelity of the people of God,
so as they enter into the land they are supposed to be obedient
to God, if they are they will receive the blessings promised,
if they are not then they will receive the curses that are promised
in Leviticus 26 and they'll be repeated and amplified and extended
even in Deuteronomy chapter 28. So that's the particular section. This is the sum, or the core
rather, of all of that law. So I'll begin reading in verse
one. And Moses called all Israel and said to them, hear, O Israel,
the statutes and judgments which I speak in your hearing today,
that you may learn them and be careful to observe them. "'The
Lord our God made a covenant with us in Horeb. "'The Lord
did not make this covenant with our fathers, "'but with us, those
who are here today, "'all of us who are alive. "'The Lord
talked with you face to face on the mountain "'from the midst
of the fire. "'I stood between the Lord and you at that time
"'to declare to you the word of the Lord, "'for you were afraid
because of the fire, "'and you did not go up the mountain. He
said, I am the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the land
of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other
gods before me. You shall not make for yourself
a carved image, any likeness of anything that is in heaven
above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water
under the earth. You shall not bow down to them
nor serve them. For I, the Lord, your God, am
a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children
to the third and fourth generations of those who hate me. but showing
mercy to thousands, to those who love me and keep my commandments.
You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for
the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain. Observe
the Sabbath day to keep it holy, as the Lord your God commanded
you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the
seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. "'In it you
shall do no work, you nor your son, "'nor your daughter, nor
your male servant, "'nor your female servant, nor your ox,
"'nor your donkey, nor any of your cattle, "'nor your stranger
who is within your gates, "'that your male servant and your female
servant "'may rest as well as you. "'And remember that you
were a slave in the land of Egypt, "'and the Lord your God brought
you out from there "'by a mighty hand and by an outstretched arm.
"'Therefore, the Lord your God commanded you "'to keep the Sabbath
day. Honor your father and your mother as the Lord your God has
commanded you, that your days may be long and that it may be
well with you in the land which the Lord your God is giving you.
You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall
not steal, you shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet your neighbor's wife and you shall not desire
your neighbor's house, his field, his male servant, his female
servant, his ox, his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor's.
These words the Lord spoke to all your assembly in the mountain,
from the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick darkness,
with a loud voice. And he added, no more. And he
wrote them on two tablets of stone and gave them to me." Amen. Remember, the moral law or the
Ten Commandments is trans-covenantal. So whatever we find here is binding
in the New Covenant as well. It's not a covenant of works.
It's not a do this and live. Rather, it's a look to Jesus
and live by God's grace. So we are justified by that grace
through faith, we are forgiven of our sins, and we receive that
righteousness of our Lord Jesus. He then fills us with the Spirit
and points us to the law as a rule or as a guide for our living
in the Christian life. So the moral law is binding upon
all men everywhere at all time. The judicial law was specifically
for the children of Israel, for their life or tenure in the land.
There are certainly principles of wisdom, a general equity principle
that we can glean from those judicial laws and bring application
in this new covenant era. The other division of the law
is ceremonial, and that specifically spoke to Israel's worship, It
regulated priesthood. It regulated temple, sacrifice,
all those things that were unique to their religious worship. Those fulfilled by our Lord Jesus
Christ are no longer binding in this new covenant era. So
the moral law is judicial law. We learn wisdom and good help
with reference to the application of moral law. But the ceremonial
law is no longer for us. So we'll take this second commandment
the way that we did the first commandment. We'll look first
at the prohibition, secondly the reason, and then the positive
aspect in the commandment. With reference to the first and
second commandments, they go hand in hand. They go together.
The first commandment gives us the object of worship, and the
second commandment prescribes the manner of worship. So in
other words, Commandment number one is the proper God we are
to worship and then commandment two is the proper way we are
to worship that God. In Israel's history there were
times when they predicated of a golden calf that that was Yahweh
who had brought them out of the land of Egypt. So that was obviously
not worshipping the living and the true God in the proper way.
In the history of Israel, there were also times when they went
after Baal, or they went after Asherah, or they went after Molech.
That was obviously an infraction of the first commandment. They
had a different object. They didn't go after the living
and the true God. So these two commandments are
inextricably connected. Watson says, in the first commandment,
worshiping a false god is forbidden. In this, worshiping the true
god in a false manner is forbidden. So that's the connection between
the two. So with reference to the prohibition,
notice in verse 8, you shall not make for yourself a carved
image, any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that
is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. So the first
prohibition is the making of idols, and the second prohibition
is the worship of idols. So note that the commandment
is comprehensive and extensive. It's not just a, don't make idols
and worship them. No, you're not supposed to make
an idol at all. You're not supposed to give any visible representation
or expression to the living and true God. We've already seen
that in Deuteronomy chapter four. You saw no form, but rather you
heard his word. So this is not a prohibition
against all art. In fact, when we get to tabernacle
and temple, there is certainly artistic expression involved.
Those artisans or those craftsmen that are responsible for building
the tabernacle and then the temple, were certainly artistically inclined,
but the specific prohibition is against making anything to
represent the God who is spirit, the God who is simple, the God
who is not to be pictured or represented by creature. And
so when we come to this, the first commandment, as I said,
forbids the worship of other gods. The second commandment
forbids making an idol to represent the true God. So look back to
Deuteronomy chapter 4, specifically at verse 15. Take careful heed
to yourselves, for you saw no form when the Lord spoke to you
at Horeb out of the midst of the fire, lest you act corruptly
and make for yourselves a carved image in the form of any figure.
the likeness of male or female, the likeness of any animal that
is on the earth, or the likeness of any winged bird that flies
in the air, the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, or
the likeness of any fish that is in the water beneath the earth.
And take heed, lest you lift your eyes to heaven, and when
you see the sun, the moon, and the stars, all the hosts of heaven,
if you feel driven to worship them and serve them, which the
Lord your God has given to all the peoples under the whole heaven
as a heritage, But the Lord has taken you and brought you out
of the iron furnace out of Egypt to be his people and inheritance
as you are this day. Furthermore, the Lord was angry
with me for your sakes and swore that I would not cross over the
Jordan and that I would not enter the good land which the Lord
your God has given you as an inheritance, but I must die in
this land. I must not cross over the Jordan,
but you shall cross over and possess that good land. Take
heed to yourselves, lest you forget the covenant of the Lord
your God, which he made with you, and make for yourselves
a carved image in the form of anything which the Lord your
God has forbidden you. For the Lord your God is a consuming
fire, a jealous God. And if you look back at Exodus
chapter 32, Exodus chapter 32, again, we have an expression
of worship directed to Yahweh, but specifically targeted at
that golden calf. Notice in chapter 32, specifically
in verse 1. Now, when the people saw that
Moses delayed coming down from the mountain, the people gathered
together to Aaron and said to him, come, make us gods that
shall go before us. For as for this Moses, the man
who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know
what has become of him. And Aaron said to them, break
off the golden earrings, which are in the ears of your wives,
your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me. So all
the people broke off the golden earrings which were in their
ears and brought them to Aaron. And he received the gold from
their hand, and he fashioned it with an engraving tool and
made a molded calf. Then they said, This is your
God, O Israel. That brought you out of the land
of Egypt. Notice then in verse 5, so when
Aaron sought, he built an altar before it. And Aaron made a proclamation
and said, tomorrow is a feast to the Lord. So they're predicating
of the calf that it brought them out of the land of Egypt, and
then this is directed specifically to Yahweh. So what we find there
is an exact violation of what is prescribed here, or prohibited
rather, in the Second Commandment. You're not supposed to make something
and say that this represents God. Idolatry is worshiping false
gods or an attempt to worship the true God falsely. As Turretin
says, it is impossible and wicked to represent God by an image. That's what's at stake here.
So if you say, well, I'm just making it, but I'm not worshiping
it, the commandment prohibits both. You're not supposed to
make and you're not supposed to worship. You're not supposed
to make because it's an absolute abomination. We can't picture
God. We can't shape God. We can't
take creature and make it represent God. The doctrine of God, or
theology proper, demands the rejection of visible representations. Calvin says the first part of
the commandment restrains our license from daring to subject
God, who is incomprehensible to our sense perceptions, or
to represent Him by any form. So the prohibition against making
has to do specifically with who God is. He is spirit. He is infinite. He is eternal. He is unchangeable. He is simple. He is incomprehensible
to everything outside of himself but himself. God knows himself
especially. So when we make an image, we
are trying to depict that God is this thing, and that is wrong. As Jesus says in John 4, 24,
God is spirit. And it's best to remember that
God is his perfections or God is his attributes. It's not that
he's made up of those things. God is unique. He is not creature. And therefore, trying to represent
him through creaturely things is to violate the second commandment. Now, when it comes to the Lord
Jesus Christ, there's certainly some debate as to whether or
not this commandment refers to the humanity of our Lord Jesus
Christ. I argue that it in fact does.
The second commandment unequivocally forbids making any likeness to
represent deity. The Westminster Larger Catechism
109 says, the making any representation of God of all or any of the three
persons. Now, practically, the emphasis
in Scripture is not upon what our Lord Jesus Christ looked
like. In fact, you can turn to the
prophet Isaiah, Isaiah chapter 53. In fact, everything in, I'm
sorry, 52. Everything in scripture is just
the opposite. It doesn't say that Jesus was
five foot nine, that Jesus had brown hair, that Jesus had big
muscles. You need to understand that whenever
people picture Jesus, it's theology that drives the conception. In
the Jehovah's Witnesses, he's ripped, he's got big muscles,
he comes out of the water, the water's glistening on him. The
Roman Catholics have him emaciated on the cross, always in a perpetual
mode of suffering. It is theology that drives those
representations. Notice in 52.14, just as many
were astonished at you, so his visage was marred more than any
man, and his form more than the sons of men. So shall he sprinkle
many nations. Kings shall shut their mouths
at him. For what had not been told them, they shall see. And
what they had not heard, they shall consider. Who has believed
our report? And to whom has the arm of the
Lord been revealed? For he shall grow up before him
as a tender plant and as a root out of dry ground. He has no
form or comeliness. And when we see him, there is
no beauty that we should desire him. He is despised and rejected
by men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief. And we
hid, as it were, our faces from him. He was despised and we did
not esteem him." And then you can turn over to John's Gospel,
John chapter 8. John chapter 8. There's an intriguing
statement that we see by the opponents of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Jesus is about 30 to 33 in his earthly ministry and he has this
debate with the unbelieving Jews and he says in verse 56, your
father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was
glad. Then the Jews said to him, you are not yet 50 years old
and have you seen Abraham? It's said that a 33-year-old
man looked 50. Well, it makes sense in the description
given by the prophet Isaiah. He's a man of sorrows. He's acquainted
with grief. There's nothing about him that
draws our attention to him in terms of a depiction that we
want to fawn all over. As well, we need to understand
that the Bible highlights his unique person, what we call the
hypostatic union, the one person, two natures. And if you look
back to John 1, one of the arguments is oftentimes, well, Jesus really
was a man. We don't want to be docetists.
Docetists taught that Jesus only appeared to be a man. We don't
want to be docetists, so there's nothing wrong with having pictures
or paintings of our Lord Jesus. Well, there is something wrong.
We cannot capture the glory of the Lord Jesus in a picture. And here in John 1.14 we learn
that the Incarnate Word, as He went about doing what the Incarnate
Word did, revealed His glory. The glory as of the only begotten
of the Father, full of grace and truth. Jehovah's Witness
Jesus does not express that glory. Roman Catholic Jesus does not
express that glory. Any Jesus on a screen, any Jesus
on a painting, any Jesus in a picture does not express that glory.
So when you saw Jesus, according to his humanity, in his earthly
ministry, you did behold that one person who had two natures. But when you have a picture or
an image, you're not beholding that one person that has two
natures. You're looking at an artist's
conception. You're looking at a theologically driven idea of
what they perceive Jesus might have looked like. Notice in John
1, 14, the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld
His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,
full of grace and truth. They beheld that glory when they
saw Him forgive sins. They beheld that glory when they
saw Him raise dead people. They beheld that glory when they
saw Him raised from the dead. You cannot capture that in an
image. You cannot get that on a painting.
You cannot get that in a movie or on a TV show. There is no
reason whatsoever why we wouldn't think that the Second Commandment
doesn't apply to the Lord Jesus Christ. The uniqueness of his
person, the fact that he has two natures, tells us that we
cannot try to represent the God-man with some artist's rendering.
Now the Lord Jesus is to be set forth, not through pictures,
not through movies, not through visual aids, but through preaching. If you look at Galatians chapter
3, the Apostle Paul makes that clear. Galatians chapter 3 verse
1, O foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you that you should
not obey the truth before whose eyes Jesus Christ was clearly
portrayed among you as crucified? How was he clearly portrayed
among them as crucified? It wasn't through images, it
wasn't through pictures, it wasn't through Mel Gibson's The Passion,
it was through the preaching of the gospel. It was through
the preaching of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ and
Him crucified. Perkins says the image also of
the cross and Christ crucified ought to be abolished out of
churches, as the brazen serpent was, 2 Kings 18. He also says,
So when Paul goes to the churches in southern Galatia and he preaches
Christ and Him crucified, he's able to write to them later, that before your eyes Jesus Christ
was clearly portrayed among you as crucified. Again, it wasn't
through pictures, it wasn't through visual aids. The Apostle Paul
understood the prohibition of the second commandment. Ersinus
says, because sometimes people do this, well, you know, what
about illiterate people? They need pictures. What about
illiterate people? Shouldn't they get the Jesus
film? What about illiterate people? Shouldn't they be, you know,
privy to that sort of a thing? Ursinus, way back when, says,
God will have His people taught, not by dumb images, but by the
lively preaching of His Word. Neither does faith come from
the sight of images, but by the hearing of the Word of God. That's
always the emphasis. Faith comes by hearing, and hearing
by the Word of God. 2 Corinthians 5. We walk by faith,
not by sight. So to put our eggs in the basket
of images or representations because we want to win these
illiterate people to the Lord Jesus is wrong. We preach the
gospel to them. We learn their language. We tell
them about the life, death, and resurrection of our Lord because
faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God. Now, as we
go back to the prohibition, there's one other thing we ought to mention.
So we've got the making of idols, but also the worship of idols.
So he says that. You shall not make. And then
it goes on to say, you shall not bow down to them, nor serve
them. Roman Catholics use images. Roman
Catholics use pictures. Roman Catholics use the stations
of the cross. Roman Catholics have all kinds
of visual imagery, right down to a tabernacle behind their
altar. with a priest serving up an atonement. Everything about
them is contrary to we walk by faith and not by sight. They
walk specifically by sight. But they make this statement
in the Catholic Encyclopedia. This is from their own writing.
So this is to try and counter the charge that when you make
the idol, you then worship the idol. And again, I don't even
think that's necessary. Making is condemned, so is worshiping. Right? But if they're going to
say, we're just making these things because they help us in
a certain way, but we're not worshiping them. Listen to what
they say. Images are in common use in the
Catholic Church. The object of images is to set
Christ, the Virgin, and the saints before our eyes. We do not worship
the images themselves, the honor which we give these objects being
referred to the persons whom they represent. Isn't that precisely
what they do in Exodus 32? Isn't this precisely what Jeroboam
does in 1 Kings 12? 1 Kings 12, this is exactly the
issue. Listen to Turretin's response.
In dealing with a similar statement, quote, I worship not this visible
thing but the divinity dwelling there invisibly. He says this. Neither would the Israelites
have been idolaters to the golden calf, which they did not suppose
to be God. For who can believe them to have
been so stupid as to believe the work of their own hands to
be that of God who had led them out of Egypt? They intended merely
to form for themselves a representation of Him that they might worship
the true God in this image." So he's saying they're They're
wrong. They do do that. They do direct
religious worship to it. But even if it was the case that
they weren't directing religious worship to it, the prohibition
against making the idol itself stands. So whether or not you
worship the made idol, you're not supposed to make an idol.
Because the idea, again, is theology proper. You cannot take the infinite
God and picture him. You cannot take the infinite
God and represent him. There is nothing in the created
order that can do that. So when it comes to the prohibition,
it's against making, and it's against worshiping. Whatever
combination you might try to throw together, both of those
are forbidden. They are condemned. Now as we
move through the commandment, we see the reasons given for
the commandment. So back to verse 9. You shall
not bow down to them nor serve them. Now note the rationale,
note the reason or the threat, if you will, and the promise.
For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity
of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations
of those who hate me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those
who love me and keep my commandments. So the doctrine of God, that's
the first point, for I, the Lord, your God, am a jealous God. That
perfection of jealousy, when you think about that as it's
predicated of God, it does not mean that God moves from one
state, non-jealous, to another state, jealous. No, it's an improper
predication. It's spoken in the manner of
men. And I think the idea behind it
is to underscore his love for his people, right? Jealousy on the part of a husband.
Now there's hyper, weird, obsessive jealousy. I mean, brothers, if
you put a tracker on your wife's car, you may have some issues.
But a jealous man is recognized as something virtuous in scripture. Look at Proverbs chapter six. Proverbs chapter six. Verse 30, people do not despise
a thief if he steals to satisfy himself when he is starving,
yet when he is found, he must restore sevenfold. He may have
to give up all the substance of his house. Whoever commits
adultery with a woman lacks understanding. He who does so destroys his own
soul. Wounds and dishonor he will get. Who do you think he's
getting those wounds from? from the husband of the wife
that he has violated. So notice, wounds and dishonor
he will get, and his reproach will not be wiped away. Why?
For jealousy is a husband's fury. Therefore he will not spare in
the day of vengeance. He will accept no recompense,
nor will he be appeased, though you give many gifts. So when
the Bible predicates jealousy with reference to our God, it's
not to speak of some change in God, again, from a non-jealous
to a jealous state. It underscores his covenant love.
It underscores his steadfastness. It underscores his interest in
his people, that when they go a-whoring from him, he is a jealous
God in the way that he deals with that. And so that's what
he says here. And so verse 9 again, for I,
the Lord your God, am a jealous God. It goes on to say, visiting
the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and
fourth generations of those who hate me. So basically what you
have is God, who he is, his perfections, but then the threat of punishment. And notice what idolatry is. It is to hate God. That's how
it's described here. He says, visiting the iniquity
of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations
of those who hate me. So, idolatry is an expression
of the enmity and the hatred of man for the living and true
God. It's not just, well, you know,
I made a picture. I probably shouldn't do those
sorts of things. No, it's an expression. No, I get the people
that are writing children's story Bibles, and they've got pictures
of Jesus, probably aren't sitting at their computers and fashioning
their images in an expression of, man, I hate God, and I want
to corrupt all these children. I just think this hasn't been
taught. I just think that outside of, you know, some reformed churches,
we don't think about what has popularly become called 2CV,
second commandment violations. A lot of the Christian trad moms
out there are bringing up the guard with reference to suit
2CV, the second commandment violations. Children's picture books filled
with images of Jesus, we should rather teach them the Scripture. Again, faith comes by hearing,
and hearing by the Word of God. So the commandment is extensive,
and this threat of punishment This use is not just here and
in Exodus 20, but you see it in Exodus 34, Numbers 14, Jeremiah
32. And as we dealt with, I think
it was a week or two ago, the emphasis is not on a transgenerational
curse. Ezekiel 18, behold the soul that
sins shall die. And then there are various things
stated there in Ezekiel 18. You can have a wicked man who
has a wicked son, and both of them subject to punishment. You
can have a wicked man who has a righteous son, and the righteous
son is not subject to punishment. So it's not a generational curse
per se. Just because one generation does
it, then the rest of the generation subsequent are going to be cursed.
Now the emphasis is on imitation. Typically if you're the son of
an idolater, most likely you're going to be an idolater. You
can look at Joshua 24. Joshua 24, where you see something
of that. Joshua chapter 24, specifically
at verse 1. Then Joshua gathered all the
tribes of Israel to Shechem, and called for the elders of
Israel, for their heads, for their judges, and for their officers,
and they presented themselves before God. And Joshua said to
all the people, thus says the Lord God of Israel, your fathers,
including Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nahor,
dwelt on the other side of the river in old times, and they
served other gods. Then I took your father Abraham
from the other side of the river, led him throughout all the land
of Canaan, and multiplied his descendants and gave him Isaac.
Most likely Abraham was just as idolatrous as his father and
his father before him. The issue is not transgenerational
curse, the issue is typically children learn what they live
and they live what they learn. They see what their parents are
doing. If you're bowing to Baal in the living room, most likely
you're going to catechize your child to bow to Baal in the living
room. most likely your child is going
to bow to Baal alongside of you in the living room. That's why
catechizing them in the truth is absolutely crucial, so that
we don't teach them to bow before Baal, but rather we teach them
to bow before Yahweh, not using, however, any images. Calvin says
this, when God declares that He will cast back the iniquity
of the fathers into the bosom of the children, He does not
mean that He will take vengeance on poor wretches who have never
deserved anything of the sort, but that He is at liberty to
punish the crimes of the fathers upon their children and descendants
with the provision that they too may be justly punished as
being imitators of their fathers. Stewart says, this oft-repeated
theme speaks of God's determination to punish successive generations
for committing the same sins they learned from their parents.
Again, it's not a transgenerational curse. It's not built in. Your
grandfather's grandfather's grandfather was an idolatrous wretch. And
so everything that befalls you right now is a curse because
of that. That's not biblical. And some
people teach that. Some people think that that is
why they've got problems, because they came from a bad background
or they had horrible parents. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ
and repent from your sin. Don't worship idols. Don't give
your attention to those things that are not God. Give yourselves
wholly and fully to the living and true God. God saves sinners.
He saved Abraham out of Ur, the Chaldeans. He saved Abraham out
of an idolatrous family. He saves sinners to the uttermost
by Jesus Christ. It is a most blessed thing. And
then notice there is this promise of mercy. Verse 10, but showing
mercy to thousands, probably generations, to those who love
me and keep my commandments. So the promise is as extensive
as is the curse. Those who learn the truth as
it is in Jesus, those who believe the gospel, those who are justified
freely by God's grace, they can bank on mercy and grace and blessing
and joy and good things coming from the Lord God most high.
So this is the reason or the rationale given for the commandment. But then finally, the positive
aspect of the commandment. Thus far in our studies in the
book of Deuteronomy, and even prior to that, in Genesis, Exodus,
Leviticus, and Numbers, what do we see an emphasis on often? Worship. Worship of the true
and living God. I think at times we forget that.
We were actually made to worship God. We were made to serve God. We were made to glorify God and
to enjoy Him forever. And so it shouldn't surprise
us that all the way through the wilderness and all the way, you
know, when we go back before the wilderness at the base of
Sinai, when much of the commandments, much of the legislation being
given had to do with worship. had to do with sacrifice, had
to do with priesthood, had to do with tabernacle, and eventually
temple. All of that underscores the centrality
of worship in terms of our relation to the living and true God. And
so with reference to worship, chapter 4 here in Deuteronomy
deals with the necessity of true worship. And we can see foundational
to the teaching of Deuteronomy 4 is the first and second commandments. When you get to Deuteronomy chapter
12, what is in view there is a central sanctuary. In other
words, God didn't want the Israelites just to start worshiping wherever
they had a hankering to. No, there was a central sanctuary,
and that was for preventative maintenance. God knows that if
you go out and you worship on the top of a mountain, now you
can obviously today in the New Covenant, you get up to the top
of Mount Shem and you want to pray and sing Psalms and praise
God, you do that. That's a great thing. But in
the days of Old Covenant Israel, what usually happened when people
wandered away from the cult? They wandered into idolatry. They wandered into bad things. In Joshua chapter 22, the eastern
tribes, remember, some of the tribes, three of the tribes stayed
on the, or at least two and a half, stayed on the eastern side of
the River Jordan. They didn't cross, or they crossed
to help with the conquest, but then they went back to that.
They make an altar over there, according to Joshua chapter 22.
When the Western tribes hear about it, they're going to go
kill them. That was the initial response. And then the specific
details notwithstanding, they tried diplomacy. Well, let's
talk to them first. And so they said, no, we're not
trying to compete with the central sanctuary on the west side, but
we just want a reminder. We want something that reminds
us of Yahweh. So the battle was not carried
out. Nobody shed blood. The Western
tribes were satisfied. Now, if you ask the question,
well, it sounds somewhat akin to what's going on in the prohibition.
It wasn't a representation of Yahweh. As they put it, or as
they stated, it was a reminder for them concerning the living
and true God. But be that as it may, the idea
is that a central sanctuary maintains orthodoxy. So in Deuteronomy
chapter 12, that's going to be a huge emphasis. So we've got
this emphasis on true worship. Then we come to what we have
looked at many times in the past. One of these times I'm going
to stop and call somebody else to come up and give the rest
of this message. The regulative principle of worship. The first and second commandments
regulate for us how we approach God. We're not free to innovate. We're not free to create, whether
we're in the Old Covenant or we're in the New Covenant. God
has not left it up to man to determine how man shall enter
into the presence of God. There is sufficient information
in the documents of the New Testament that instruct us on how we are
supposed to worship. We're to be faithful. So with
reference to the regulative principle, there is an alternate view called
the normative principle. The regulative principle teaches
that we do what God commands. Full stop. We do what God commands. The normative principle says
we do what God commands, but we're free to do that which he
doesn't condemn. If you can't see the problem
in that, Outside of exegesis, you really need to think about
it. God doesn't forbid puppet shows. God doesn't forbid a pastor
riding to the front of the stage in a Harley, right? That opens the door to anything
and everything. The normative principle, this
is what Anglicans, this is what Romanists, this is what Lutherans
practiced. And the reform said, no, it's
the regulative principle. We are only free to do that which
God has commanded. We're not free to do that which
he hasn't condemned or which he hasn't forbidden. So with
reference to this, Deuteronomy 12, I mentioned it, you can turn
there. Deuteronomy 12, after the teaching concerning the central
sanctuary, there is then a warning at the end in verse 29. Verse
29, when the Lord your God cuts off from before you the nations
which you go to dispossess, and you displace them and dwell in
their land, take heed to yourself that you are not ensnared to
follow them after they are destroyed from before you, and that you
do not inquire after their gods, saying, How did these nations
serve their gods? I also will do likewise. See,
God knows the heart of man. He knows what's going to happen
when they go into that promised land. There's going to be those
curious people that say, well, what about this bale? What about
this asherah? What about this mollack? Maybe
they work. Maybe bale does provide fertilizer. Maybe bale is the storm god. Maybe bale will help us with
our crops. We're not going to neglect Yahweh,
but we're going to add bale services right alongside of Yahweh's.
So the caution comes on the heels of this emphasis on a central
sanctuary, again, which was given to engage in preventative maintenance
with reference to orthodoxy. Notice in verse 31, you shall
not worship the Lord your God in that way. For every abomination
to the Lord which he hates, they have done to their gods. For
they burn even their sons and daughters in the fire to their
gods. Now note verse 32. This is a encapsulated statement
concerning the regulative principle. Whatever I command you, be careful
to observe it. You shall not add to it, nor
take away from it. Pastor Albert M. Martin describes
the regulative principle just like that. Nothing more, nothing
less, and nothing else than what God has commanded. That's the
safe spot to be relative to the first and second commandments.
You've got Hebrews 12, 28, therefore since we are receiving a kingdom
which cannot be shaken, let us have grace by which we may serve
God acceptably with reference and godly fear. Do we think about
that word acceptably? Acceptably to who? To the charismatics? The people that want to dance
on Sundays, no, it's not acceptable to us. It's acceptable to God. That should be the requirement
when we think through how our church is going to worship. Well,
I don't like this. That doesn't matter. I'd prefer
this. That doesn't matter. It's not
about us. It's about God. I'm not saying
we should be as nasty and horrible and obnoxious about it as we
can possibly be. You know, brethren, we're going
to sit on spikes and we're going to just knuckle under and, you
know, no AC, nothing like that. You're going to just suffer.
No, we'll deal with that sort of category in just a moment.
And then again, Hebrews 12, our God is a consuming fire. Same
statement that you get in Deuteronomy 4, 24. Shows the consistency
of the principle. If Deuteronomy 4 is about proper
worship to the living God, and it's punctuated with the statement,
our God is a consuming fire, and then the apostle in Hebrews
12 talks about acceptable worship, and then he punctuates it with,
our God is a consuming fire, what is the apostle suggesting
there in Hebrews 12? It's just like the old covenant.
The positive laws have changed. There's no more sacrifice, there's
no more priesthood, there's no more tabernacle, there's no more
incense. Positive law has changed with reference to covenant. But
in terms of moral law, the abiding perpetuity of first and second
commandments, you are supposed to worship God the way the covenant
you're in dictates and demands. Why? Because our God is a consuming
fire. 1 Timothy 3, 14 and 15, these
things I write to you, though I hope to come to you shortly,
but if I am delayed, I write, so that you may know how you
ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the
church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
When it comes to the regulative principle of worship, you need
to understand, when it came to Moses' own tent, Moses' own house,
Moses' own dwelling place, God never said, hey Moses, I want
the couch in that corner. I want the fridge over there.
I want your entertainment stuff. He doesn't do that. He doesn't
regulate Moses' house. He regulates his house. And that's
what Paul says here. I write so that you may know
how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God. The main
emphasis on the worshipper ought not to be on what is acceptable
to me, but what does the householder demand? What does this God demand? How am I supposed to function
when I'm on His property, when I'm in His house? So when it
comes to this, one of our Baptist forefathers, Benjamin Keech,
says, whatsoever we do in the worship of God, we must see we
have a command from God to warrant our practice. And also, we must
not add to, nor diminish from, nor alter anything. If we do,
God will not hold us guiltless. And of course, our confession,
I think, has a wonderful statement in chapter 22, paragraph 1. The
light of nature shows that there is a God. So what? We see. As image bearers, when we look
out at the world around us, the way Paul tells us, the effects
of creation lead us to the reality of a creator. And Paul says his
eternal power and Godhead are manifested in the things that
are made. Also, sinners, according to 132, know that it's righteous
with God to punish sinners. So, light of nature, general
revelation, natural theology, whatever we want to call it,
does show us that there is a God who should be worshipped, and
that's what the Confession says. The light of nature shows that
there is a God who has lordship and sovereignty over all. is
just, good, and doth good unto all, and is therefore to be feared,
loved, praised, called upon, trusted in, and served with all
the heart and all the soul and with all the might." That's why
Paul can say in Romans 1, they're without an excuse. Literally,
they're without an apologetic. They have no defense. They can't
say, well, I didn't know. Well, the creation around you
screams God. You just suppress that truth
and unrighteousness because you didn't want to retain the knowledge
of God in your hearts. Now our confession then goes
on to say this, but, so what they're saying, light of nature
shows us there's a God. Shows us that this God is to
be feared, He's to be loved, He's to be served, He's to be
worshipped, but The acceptable way of worshipping the true God
is instituted by Himself, and so limited by His own revealed
will, that He may not be worshipped according to the imagination
and devices of men, nor the suggestions of Satan, under any visible representations,
or any other way not prescribed in the Holy Scripture." So general
revelation tells you there is a God. tells you you should worship
and serve that God. But you need special revelation
in order to come to that God in the way that He has prescribed,
in the way that He has dictated, in the way that He has commanded.
So in the Old Testament, it was through the cult. In the New
Covenant, it's through our Lord Jesus Christ. That's the acceptable
way that we approach the Father. So the confessional statement
lays down the necessity of worship. As well, our confession deals
with a distinction in worship that we need to remember. The
distinction is there are elements of worship. Those are the things
that God commands us to do. We're supposed to pray and worship.
We're supposed to preach in worship. We're supposed to read in worship.
We're supposed to praise in worship. Those are the elements. When
you boil it all down, you ask the question, in the New Testament
epistles, what are the apostles telling us we're supposed to
do when we get together? Acts 2, they continued steadfastly
in what? In the apostles' doctrine, in
fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers. Those
are elements. Those are non-negotiable. You
can't say, well, we're going to not do those, and we're going
to supply these things instead. No, elements are non-negotiable. Those are the things that make
up worship. But there are also what's called
circumstances. Circumstances has to do with
things that aren't prescribed specifically in the Bible, but
the light of nature helps us with. For instance, what time
does a church meet? There's no text in Romans 17
that says thou must meet at 11 a.m. on a Sunday morning after
either a confession study or a prayer meeting at 9.30 and
then you have to meet again at 5. There's no text that prescribes
that. There's no text that says that.
Those are circumstances. Those are circumstances that
church has put into place where there isn't explicit instruction
on those sorts of things. There's no command to use the
Trinity Psalter hymnal. It's a circumstance. Now, in
Confession Chapter 1 at paragraph 6, it says, Nevertheless, we acknowledge
the inward illumination of the Spirit of God to be necessary
for the saving understanding of such things as are revealed
in the Word, and that there are some circumstances concerning
the worship of God and government of the Church, common to human
actions and societies, which are to be ordered by the light
of nature and Christian prudence, according to the general rules
of the Word, which are always to be observed. So in the absence
of specific texts as to what time a church meets, it's not
wrong for a church to say, we're going to meet at 11. We're going
to meet at 5. It's going to help us to keep the Sabbath day. It's
going to be a morning and evening. It's not going to be the Lord's
morning. It's not going to be the Lord's evening. It's going
to be the Lord's day. So that's a helpful way to facilitate that.
How did we learn that? Romans 17? No, light of nature,
Christian prudence, horse sense. Things that are calculated to
promote the use of the elements of worship as we approach the
Father through the Son in the Spirit. As well, our confession
in chapter 22 highlights the limitation concerning worship.
It's only what God commands. But the acceptable way of worshiping
the true God is instituted by Himself and so limited by His
own revealed will. It's limited by God. It is by
design. And there's a marked difference
or contrast between Old Covenant worship with the incense, and
with the priesthood, and with the instrumentation, and with
the tabernacle, and with the temple. A lot of the older Reform
writers says it's because the Jews were carnal. They were fleshly.
They needed that to tie them to that cult. We're in the New
Covenant, we're blood-bought children of God with the Holy
Spirit that dwells in us, so naturally worship is going to
be simple. We don't need all that stuff.
We don't need all of those trappings. We simply need the Father through
the Son in the Spirit according to the mind of God as limited
by God relative to the worship of the New Covenant Church. The
prohibitions concerning worship, devices of men, suggestions of
Satan, visible representations, any way not prescribed in the
Holy Scriptures. So, chapter 22, paragraph 1 is
a great, you know, if somebody ever says, why doesn't your church
have puppet shows? Why doesn't your pastor ride
a Harley up to the pulpit? Well, chapter 22, paragraph 1.
And I'm not kidding. I've seen services. I'm sure
it's not going on now, but, you know, super cool pastor dude
riding his motorcycle up to the pulpit. I would kill myself if
I did that. That would be a horrible venture. If that's required, I'm a goner.
There's a reason I don't ride a motorcycle. I crashed on a
mini bike as a kid and broke my collarbone. That cured me.
And just in summary, I think Johnson, in his very helpful
book, it's a tiny book, excellent book, called Reformed Worship,
he says, to put it simply, he's dealing with the elements, in
worship we pray the Bible, sing the Bible, read the Bible, and
preach and see the Bible. We see the Bible in the sacraments,
baptism and the Lord's Supper. So the first and second commandments
are binding upon us today. They're not salvific. It's not,
we get saved as long as we only go after the true and living
God, only in the manner that he says. Because remember, if
it is that, then it must be exact, it must be entire, and it must
be perpetual. So we're not looking to the first
and second commandments for salvation, but we are looking to the first
and second commandments for instruction, and for assistance, and for aid,
and for help, so that as those blood-bought children of God
who have been justified freely by His grace, who now have the
Holy Spirit, how then are we supposed to approach God? Well,
we come to the living and the true God, and we come in the
way that He tells us to. It's very simple. It takes the
guesswork out of a lot of it. You don't need teams. You don't
need groups. You don't need focused sessions. Well, how are we going to structure
worship? How about this? We do what the apostles tell
us, because they're writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
We should just listen and obey and do what they call us to do.
So in conclusion, the prohibition, the worshiping of false gods.
Turn to Psalm 115 to see one of the practical problems in
idolatry. One of the practical problems
in idolatry. Verse 1, not unto us, O Lord,
not unto us, but to your name give glory, because of your mercy,
because of your truth. Why should the Gentiles say,
so where is their God? But our God is in heaven. He
does whatever he pleases. Their idols are silver and gold,
the work of men's hands. They have mouths, but they do
not speak. Eyes they have, but they do not see. They have ears,
but they do not hear. Noses they have, but they do
not smell. They have hands, but they do not handle. Feet they
have, but they do not walk. Nor do they mutter through their
throat. Now note verse eight. Those who make them are like
them. So is everyone who trusts in
them. It's interesting, often in the
Old Testament, the Old Covenant people are upbraided with the
statement, stiff necked. You're stiff necked. That probably
is an allusion to them having become like that which they worship. You're worshipping calves. You're
worshipping animals. Animals that need a yoke because
they're stiff-necked. Animals that need to be hedged
in because they're wayward. Notice G.K. Beale, in an excellent
book on idolatry, it's a biblical theology of idolatry, he says,
what you revere, you resemble, either for ruin or for restoration. What you revere, you resemble,
either for ruin or for restoration. Those who make them are like
them, so is everyone who trusts in them. Christopher Wright says
the primal problem with idolatry is that it blurs the distinction
between the creator God and the creation. This both damages creation,
including ourselves, and diminishes the glory of the creator. Turn
to 1 Samuel chapter 13 for just a moment. 1 Samuel chapter 13. So worshiping false gods is bad. You're going to become like those
gods. But attempting to worship the
true God in a false way is bad, even if you think you should,
even if you're compelled or constrained to do it. Notice in 1 Samuel
13, specifically, we'll pick up at verse 8, beginning of the
second part of verse 7, as for Saul, he was still in Gilgal.
So Samuel told Saul, I'm going to come and meet you. So, he
was still in Gilgal, and all the people followed him, trembling.
Then he waited seven days according to the time set by Samuel. But
Samuel did not come to Gilgal, and the people were scattered
from him. So Saul said, Bring a burnt offering and peace offerings
here to me. And he offered the burnt offering.
Now, at first glance, we might think, Hey, he's doing something
good. He's not doing something good. When the prophet of God
says, wait here for me for seven days. If I don't show up in seven
days, that doesn't mean go ahead and just do whatever you want
when it comes to worship. Now it happened, verse 10, as
soon as he had finished presenting the burnt offering, that Samuel
came. And Saul went out to meet him, that he might greet him.
And Samuel said, what have you done? Saul said, when I saw that
the people were scattered from me, and that you did not come
within the days appointed, and that the Philistines gathered
together at Michmash, then I said, the Philistines will now come
down on me at Gilgal, and I have not made supplication of the
Lord. Therefore, I felt compelled and offered a burnt offering.
Again, we stop and say, well, he was compelled. He had religious
yearnings. Come on, it was a good thing. It wasn't a good thing. Verse
13, Samuel said to Saul, you have done foolishly. You have
not kept the commandment of the Lord your God, which he commanded
you. For now the Lord would have established your kingdom over
Israel forever, but now your kingdom shall not continue. The
Lord has sought for himself a man after his own heart, and the
Lord has commanded him to be commander over his people because
you have not kept what the Lord commanded you. Now, in 1 Samuel
15, Saul's going to do another bad, wretched, horrible thing.
He's going to not obey God when it comes to utterly destroying
Agag and the Amalekites. But the transfer of the kingdom
from Saul's son Jonathan to David's house isn't predicated on his
ill-fought war against Agag and the Amalekites. That just further
sealed the deal. It's on false worship. It's on
a second commandment violation. It's on a, well, I felt compelled. I didn't want to sit around and
twiddle my thumbs waiting for you there, Samuel. So the prohibition
of the command is serious business. You ask Nadab and Abihu. Ask
Ananias and Sapphira, if you will, in the New Testament. What
happens when you don't honor God, when you don't worship God
according to his will? Secondly, the positive emphasis
of the commandment. We need good theology. We're
not going to worship the true God truly if we don't know that
God. As well, the requirement to worship
God in an acceptable manner. We need to avail ourselves of
the documents that instruct us on how to worship. That, for
us in this New Covenant setting, is the New Testament. Not that
we don't learn anything from the Old Testament. We see the
continuity in terms of moral principle, first and second commandment.
Positive law, however, in the New Covenant is different than
it is in the Old Covenant. That's all good theology. The
Bible tells us this. But when it comes to what we
do in worship, it's not up to this group or that group. It
is up to the New Testament. As well, the blessing of the
true worship of God. You know, you sometimes hear
that. Well, you know, I get so much fulfillment out of speaking
in tongues. I get so much fulfillment out
of, you know, bowing to this Mary statue. Well, what fulfillment? What kind of fulfillment? Our
only desired fulfillment is to honor and glorify God. And if
we're kissing the foot of a Mary statue, that's not honoring to
God. And then as well, the rejection
of will worship. Will worship is what our confession
refers to, and it's there in Colossians chapter two, verses
20 to 23. Those things that men do that
have an appearance of being godly, but they're not. They're not
godly. Fisher says, and so also are
all carnal imaginations of God in his worship, as you may see.
And so also is all will worship, or the worshiping of God according
to our own fancy, as you may see. He goes on, whatsoever worships
are instituted by men, or do any way hinder God's true worship,
they are contrary to this commandment. So very important, first and
second commandments, very important that we get our minds wrapped
around that prohibition. It's not just the worshiping,
but it's also the making. It's the making and it's the
worshiping. Both are prohibited, both are
to be shunned and avoided. The theological rationale is
because you cannot represent the infinite God. You cannot
put into a picture form the hypostatic union of our Lord Jesus Christ.
You just can't do it. So may God help us with reference
to these things. We'll all pray. Father in heaven,
we thank you for your word. We thank you for these commandments
given on the plains of Moab that were given on Mount Sinai. We see them in the New Covenant
as well. We pray that you would give us ears to hear and hearts
to receive these things. Help us to be faithful with reference
to these things, not in a sense where we hope to be saved as
a result, but because we are saved by great grace. Help us
to live in light of these truths, and we ask this through Jesus
Christ our Lord. Amen. Well, any questions or
comments? Yes. Yes. The light of nature tells us
we should do it on Sunday evening. No, there's no specific reason.
Some of the older authors did argue that it's the Lord's supper.
It's not the Lord's breakfast. You know, I think there's some
merit to that. I mean, I don't know that I'd
hang my hat on that necessarily, but it does seem to be a good
time to facilitate the practice. But no, I don't know of a specific
text that demands that it has to be at night. Okay. Well, we did, but we just moved
it to one. Yeah. Yeah. We had to be cunning as serpents.