← Back to sermon library
Since the day that I brought
my people Israel out of Egypt, I have chosen no city from any
tribe of Israel in which to build a house, that my name might be
there. But I chose David to be over
my people Israel. Now it was in the heart of my
father David to build a temple for the name of the Lord God
of Israel. But the Lord said to my father
David, Whereas it was in your heart to build a temple for my
name, you did well that it was in your heart. Nevertheless,
you shall not build the temple, but your Son who will come from
your body, He shall build the temple for my name. So the Lord
has fulfilled His word which He spoke, and I have filled the
position of my father David, and sit on the throne of Israel,
as the Lord promised. And I have built a temple for
the name of the Lord God of Israel. And there I have made a place
for the ark, in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He
made with our fathers when He brought them out of the land
of Egypt. Amen. Well, we come to the last book
in what's called the former prophets. The former prophets are Joshua,
Judges, 1st and 2nd Samuel, and 1st and 2nd Kings. And while
1st and 2nd Chronicles are similar to 1st and 2nd Kings, The former
prophets are strictly Joshua through Kings. Chronicles belong
to the classification of the writings in the Hebrew canon,
and so they are a little bit different in terms of genre and
form, though there is significant overlap in terms of the material. One man says the book of Kings,
1st and 2nd Kings together, is the last book of the former prophets,
completing the narrative of God's people in the land of Canaan
that began in the books of Deuteronomy and Joshua. Now, they are historical,
first and second Kings, but it's theological history. In other
words, the author, the editors put together this particular
book in order to set forth various concerns for the nation of Israel,
instruction concerning the fall of Israel, and ultimately instruction
concerning the doctrine of the God of Israel. So tonight we
want to introduce 1st and 2nd Kings. They technically go together. The separation between 1st and
2nd Kings was probably more practical rather than theological or thematic. It was a big book and so they
split it in two. But I want to look at the title,
the author, and the date. Secondly, look at the continuation
of the monarchy. Thirdly, the structure of the
book, and then fourthly, the major themes in the book. But
with reference to title, author, and date, the title in the Hebrew
Bible is 1st and 2nd Kings. As I said, the split between
the two is probably not theological, just practical. In the Greek
translation of the Hebrew Old Testament, the Septuagint, it
broke Samuel into two books together with 1st and 2nd Kings, and they
were called Books of the Kingdoms. Thus, 1st and 2nd Samuel are
1st and 2nd Kingdoms, and 1st and 2nd Kings are 3rd and 4th
Kingdoms. So if you ever pick up the Septuagint
and read, that's the difference there. In the Latin Vulgate,
you simply have 1st through 4th Kings. Now, the author has not
told us, just like when we studied the book of Samuel. We're not
certain who composed Samuel. There is an absence of a reference.
There is an ancient Jewish tradition that suggests that it was Jeremiah
the prophet that wrote the books of 1 and 2 Kings. As I said,
we don't know for certain, but we do know that they are indeed
Scripture. Paul in the book of Romans speaks
specifically of kings in Romans 11, 2. He says, God has not cast
away his people whom he foreknew. Or do you not know what the scripture
says of Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel saying,
Lord, they have killed your prophets and torn down your altars and
I alone am left and they seek my life. So certainly we don't
know the particular human author involved but we know ultimately
the divine author is the Holy Spirit of God Most High. Now
in terms of the dates, there's two sets of dates that we ought
to understand. There's the dates that the book
was composed, and then there's the dates that the book covers
in terms of history. It covers about a 400-year span
that begins with the death of David and the beginning of the
reign of Solomon, and that's dated at 971 BC. So 971 BC is
when the book officially begins. Now the death
of David, I'm not the exact sure, probably 970, 71, or 7271, around
that time. And then the book ends in 2 Kings chapter 25, with
the fall of Jerusalem, and that took place in 586. But it doesn't stop there because
Jehoiachin is how the book ends. And Jehoiachin began his reign
in 561. And in 2 Kings 25-27, it says
in the 37th year of his reign. So it takes us down to 561 BC.
So 971 BC to 561 BC are the dates covered in terms of the material
in 1st and 2nd Kings. Now, most suggest that the books
were written after 560, probably between 560 and 538 BC. So again, it was after the fall
of Jerusalem in the 6th century, and it was probably during the
exile while the people of Israel, or Judah rather, were in Babylonian
captivity. So that's title, author, and
date. Secondly, the books essentially
record for us, in terms of their history, the continuation of
the monarchy in Israel. You can turn to the book of Deuteronomy
for a moment just to rehearse what we have seen or learned
thus far in our study of the Old Testament concerning the
monarchy or the kingship in Israel. In Deuteronomy chapter 17, specifically
beginning in verse 14, we learn that there are specific principles
or laws or rules that were to govern the king in Israel. Notice
in 17.14, when you come to the land which the Lord your God
is giving you and possess it and dwell in it and say, I will
set a king over me like all the nations that are around me, you
shall surely set a king over you whom the Lord your God chooses.
One from among your brethren you shall set as king over you.
You may not set a foreigner over you who is not your brother.
But he shall not multiply horses for himself, nor cause the people
to return to Egypt to multiply horses. For the Lord has said
to you, you shall not return that way again. Neither shall
he multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away, nor
shall he greatly multiply silver and gold for himself. Also, it
shall be, when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, that he
shall write for himself a copy of this law in a book from the
one before the priests, the Levites. And it shall be with him, and
he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn
to fear the Lord as God and be careful to observe all the words
of this law and these statutes, that his heart may not be lifted
above his brethren, that he may not turn aside from the commandment
to the right hand or to the left, and that he may prolong his days
in his kingdom, he and his children, in the midst of Israel." Now,
as we move through these historical books, we see that the king certainly
did not toe the line. They did not follow this clear
injunction concerning the particulars with reference to their rule.
Many of them multiply wives, many of them multiply horses,
or military weaponry, and many of them multiply wealth. They
depart from the law of God in this particular instance. Notice
as well, what the first order of business was to be for the
king. Verse 18, when he sits on the throne of his kingdom,
he shall write for himself a copy of this law in a book from the
one before the priests, the Levites. And it shall be with him, and
he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn
to fear the Lord his God, and be careful to observe all the
words of this law and these statutes. One wonders if the kings of Israel
had actually fulfilled this particular mandate, things would have been
much, much different in terms of the particular nation involved
in the covenant, the nation that was called to be the covenant
people of God. So, we note that during the time
of the judges, there was no king in Israel and everyone did what
was right in his own eyes. So, God raised up judges to serve
as deliverers for the nation of Israel. The book of Judges
simply is a series of cycles. The people of Israel sin against
God. God raises up foreign oppressors.
He sends them in order to punish or chastise the covenant people. The people then cry out for deliverance. They don't cry out in repentance,
but rather they cry out in distress. And because of the God of mercy
that He is, He would raise up these human deliverers, these
saviors, these judges in Israel, and they would bring deliverance
to the people of Israel. We get to the book of 1 Samuel,
and there we see people crying out for a king. And it's not
the monarchy, necessarily, that is a sinful request. It is what
drives this request. They do want to be like the nations
around them. Instead of trusting in the sovereignty
of God and in the power of their covenant God, they would rather
have an earthly king to rule over them. Remember that in 1
Samuel chapter 8, God through Samuel says, the king that you
get is going to exploit you. The king that you get is going
to tax you. The king that you get is going
to do all manner of nasty things to you. And nevertheless, the
people cry out, so God calls Samuel to anoint Saul. Saul becomes the king and he
is covenantally unfaithful. He is a wretch, and so the Lord
God condemns him. The Lord God says that he is
going to give the kingdom to a man after his own heart. And so it's David who serves
as the king of Israel from about 1 Samuel 16, when he's anointed,
all the way to the end of 2 Samuel. Now, David's reign was a good
reign. It was positive overall, but
it was not perfect. Certainly, we saw the misgivings
or the shortcomings, rather, of David when we studied 1 and
2 Samuel. Well, that brings us specifically
to the book of Kings. And what we have here, as we've
mentioned before, is that Solomon, the son of David, occupies the
throne in Israel. Solomon has a good reign. There is peace, there is blessing,
there is prosperity during Solomon's reign. The people of Israel do
engage in and do enjoy a season of great blessing and comfort.
But nevertheless, Solomon himself, as good and as positive as a
presentation we have of Solomon's reign in chapters 1 to 11, we
see that it's not perfect. If you keep in mind, What Deuteronomy
17, 16, and 17 says, a king was not supposed to multiply wives. Solomon does that. A king was
not to multiply wealth. Now that doesn't mean he had
to be dirt poor, but the queen of Sheba comes to see the pomp
and the glory and the majesty of Solomon's kingdom. And the
king of Israel was not to multiply weapons. But Solomon does that
very thing in terms of horses and in terms of chariots. So
as good as Solomon was, he did typify for us the Lord Jesus
Christ. He was nevertheless a sinful
king. And so in 1 Kings chapter 12,
as a result, or after Solomon's death, his son Rehoboam becomes
king. And then Jeroboam, the son of
Nebat, rebels against Rehoboam. And essentially what Jeroboam
does is split the kingdom. And this is a judgment from God
upon the nation. We'll see that when we get to
1 Kings chapter 12. But what you have then is what's
called the divided monarchy. You have two sections. The one
kingdom of Israel becomes a divided kingdom. You have the North and
you have the South. And in the South you have two
tribes, Judah and Benjamin. All the rest are in the North.
And there is some friendship among the kingdoms throughout
the books of 1st and 2nd Kings, but there is some unfriendly
activity that goes on between them as well. So a bulk of, or
much of, first and second kings deals with that monarchy, or
that divided monarchy. And what the author does, he
doesn't just treat the kings of Israel and then jumps to the
kings of Judah, but he does them sort of parallel, and there is
something of an overlap, or rather the absence or the lack of an
overlap, because you might have a king of Israel here, and then
a king of Judah here. Basically, the timing is a bit
difficult to trace, and we'll try and note that as we move
through these particular books. But it is intriguing that in
the kingdom of Judah, you had, counting Solomon, 21 kings in
about 343 years. In the kings of Israel, you had
20 kings in 200 years. They didn't have dynasty. There
were several, or there were a couple where there were four perhaps
in a dynasty, but the common thread running through Judah
is that they were descendants from David. And we'll see that
as we move into the major themes of the book. In terms, thirdly,
of the structure of the book, I think you could take a large
swath and break 1st and 2nd Kings down into three primary sections. You have the reign of Solomon
in 1st Kings 1.1 to 1st Kings 11.43. You then have the divided monarchy
in 1 Kings 12, 1 to 2 Kings 17, 41. And then you have the kingdom
of Judah alone in 2 Kings 18, 1 to 25, 30. And the reason you
have the kingdom of Judah alone is because the Northern kingdom
falls in 2 Samuel, I'm sorry, 2 Kings 17. They fall to Assyria. So essentially what you have
in 1st and 2nd Kings is not only God's sovereignty, His preservation
of the people, His goodness and His kindness to them, but you
also have the sinfulness and the rebellion of both kingdoms. And as a result, they provoke
the Lord God Most High and He brings the covenant curses to
bear upon Him. What we are seeing in the destruction
of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 was not a new thing. The very same thing is recorded
for us in 2 Kings 17 and then again in 2 Kings 24 and 25 with
the fall of the northern kingdom and the fall of the southern
kingdom. This was God's punishment and this was God's judgment upon
the nation of Israel because they had violated or broken the
covenant they had made or had sworn to keep with the God of
Israel. So we see the title, the author,
and the date. We note the continuation of the
monarchy, the structure of the book. Now, what are some of the
major themes in the book? And there are several that we
ought to consider. The first place, on a human level,
it is the history of Israel. I mean, it's about a 400-year
period. If you understand 1st and 2nd
Kings, it will help you understand a whole lot of your Old Testament. And without this understanding,
without a knowledge of what 1st and 2nd Kings is all about, it's
going to be tough to make heads or tails out of certain of the
prophets. Because remember, the prophets
are writing, and the prophets are preaching, and the prophets
are ministering to Israel during this 400-year period. Now, not
all of the prophets, there were some that came after the exile
in Babylon, but a bulk of the prophets were speaking and preaching
and teaching and calling Israel to repentance and faith during
this 400-year period. I really can't understand how
persons could read the prophets profitably without having a knowledge
of first and second kings, to have that historical background. When you read Isaiah, for instance,
it is most crucial to understand the years that he prophesied,
to know something in terms of the kings who were in Israel
and in Judah. It's also very helpful to understand
what the world powers were outside of the the kingdom of Israel.
To know that is to be helped as you read the prophet Isaiah.
We're not supposed to just mine out little timeless truths from
the prophets and put them on our refrigerators. We're supposed
to understand what their function was and how they operated and
in order to do that these books of 1st and 2nd Kings are crucial
to an understanding of the prophets. I mean, when you read about Jeremiah
having to leave and going into Egypt, you need to understand
what the backdrop is in that regard. When you learn these
historical books, it helps you to fill in some of the places
so that you can indeed understand the prophets. And conversely,
when you read the prophets, you go to the historical books and
you can understand what's happening and what's facing them at that
particular time. So the history of Israel, and
I think really practically it ought to instruct us and help
us to consider what life in the kingdom ought to look like. In
other words, we are in the church. The church is the visible expression
of the kingdom of God on earth. We ought to learn from the mistakes
or from the sins that have been perpetrated before us. We ought
to realize that we ought to give heed to the prophetic word. We
ought not to do the sorts of things that the people of Israel
fell into so many times in this 400-year period, and we ought,
by the grace of God, strive to be faithful to the law that the
Lord has given to us. It doesn't do us any good to
have the entirety of the Bible and then sin with an impudent
mindset when we see the examples that have gone on before us.
As the apostle says in Romans 15, All of Scripture is written
for our encouragement and for our admonition. Now, we ought
not to moralize and say we ought to dare to be an Elisha and this
is the reasons how or the reasons why, but we ought to learn from
these particular accounts that we shouldn't duplicate the same
sorts of sins that the children of Israel fell into. 1 Kings
17 and 18 with reference to Elijah and the contest at Carmel. Well, we ought to learn or we
ought to see there's an equivalence between what the prophet Elijah
says in terms of, choose you this day whom you will serve.
If Yahweh is God, serve Him. If Baal is God, then serve Him.
We ought to see something paralleled in that with reference to Jesus'
words in Matthew 12, 30. He who is not with me is against
me. They're saying and preaching
essentially the same message. So there is a whole host of things
that we ought to learn from the history of Israel. We ought to
imitate when they did what was right in the eyes of the Lord,
and we ought to guard against doing those things that were
displeasing in the eyes of the Lord. A second major theme in
the book is the Law of Moses. Now, we know it's the Law of
God, but for convenience sake, we'll call it the Law of Moses.
That refers to the first five books of the Bible, the Pentateuch. Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers,
and Deuteronomy. Primarily, Deuteronomy is behind
the scenes in the books of King. If I just say book, that means
1st and 2nd Kings. It really is considered as one
book. But how are the Kings measured
with reference to their performance? They're measured according to
the law of Moses. They're measured according to
the law of God. In fact, as the author is indicating
to us that, say for instance, Solomon makes a treaty with Pharaoh,
king of Daughter, and marries Pharaoh's daughter, then he brought
her to the city of David until he had finished building his
own house, and the house of the Lord, and the wall all around
Jerusalem. Perhaps the author is recalling
to our minds the whole mandate of holy war. Holy War and Deuteronomy
17 specifically discouraged making political alliances, social alliances,
and certainly religious alliances with the Canaanites in the land.
And here in 1 Kings chapter 3, Solomon is marrying an Egyptian
woman in order to make a political treaty. Now, some might look
at that and say, well, that's good. You ought to make political
treaties. Not if you're the people of Yahweh.
Not when he has said that you are to go into the land and utterly
destroy everything that they own, tear down their idols, dispossess
the land of the Canaanites. No reader of 1 Kings 3.1 should
say, well, Solomon's really acting wisely in this particular point.
When we move on and we see that Solomon multiplies wealth, and
he multiplies wives in addition to this one, and when he multiplies
horses, the author is alluding to or having us to remember what
the Deuteronomic law says and what it stipulates. And we just
read it there in Deuteronomy 17, 16 and 17. If we read through
1 Kings 1 to 11, and we conclude that Solomon was a great guy
until the very end, We ought not to, you know, or we ought
to sort of reevaluate and realize that, no, there were foreshadowings
or there were symbolic or statements rather
that show us that Solomon is on the wrong path. So it is the
law of Moses by which the kings are measured according specifically
to the book of Deuteronomy. Thirdly, we see the reign of
Solomon. And again, I don't want to, you
know, diss Solomon. It's always tough when you're,
you know, on this side of things to call into question. But the
Spirit gave us these things concerning not only Solomon, but David.
And we would be remiss to not point out their shortcomings
and their failures. Remember, one of the purposes
in the entirety of the Old Testament is to point us to the one true
hero. David was a heroic man. Solomon was a great man. There
were kings that were most excellent. Josiah, Hezekiah are two that
stand out among the Judahites. But all of these men were men
at best, and they point us forward to the one that will be without
sin, the one that is holy, harmless, and undefiled, the one that is
the perfect king. Remember Jesus in Matthew's gospel
says there is a greater than Solomon here. He is a greater
than Solomon. Solomon was typical. He did point
forward, but Solomon's reign fell short of what Jesus Christ
will accomplish or does accomplish. So the encouraging aspects in
terms of Solomon's reign, his request for wisdom. I mean, that's
a most excellent thing. When God the Lord comes to Solomon
and asks him, what do you want? And what does Solomon say? He
wants wisdom. That is a blessed lesson we ought
to learn from Solomon. If God comes to you and says,
what one thing can I give you? What would you say? I don't want
a show of hands or I don't want you to say, you know, I want
a hundred more wishes, God. You know, we would treat him
as if he's the genie. You get three wishes. What's your first
wish? Well, I want a hundred wishes. Well, that's not what
we're dealing with here. But God comes to Solomon and
says, what do you want? And he says, I want wisdom. And
then we see the use of that wisdom right away. Solomon demonstrates
wisdom in terms of his political rule and his political leadership. It is most excellent. So he not
only requests wisdom, but he also uses wisdom. And then he
is the builder of the temple. This is Solomon's primary claim
to fame. Remember in 2 Samuel 7, David
is sitting in his nice house, and he wants to build a house
for the Lord. And the Lord God sends the prophet
to tell him, you're not going to build a house for me, I'm
going to build a house for you. And what God the Lord means to
David is not your own personal dwelling place, not your own
personal palace, but I'm going to make a dynasty out of you,
David. From your line kings will come. One king will ultimately come
who will rule and reign forever and ever. But the son of David
was to build a house for the Lord. And Solomon realizes this. Again, I think it's still typical
and it points forward to what we see in Matthew 16. After Peter
confesses, thou art the Christ, the son of the living God. He
is the son of God according to the Davidic covenant. And then
Jesus says, I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not
prevail against it. You have a Davidic son who builds
a house for God. Yes, in Solomon, but it's realized
fully and brought to consummation through our Lord Jesus. So Solomon
had some encouraging aspects. The discouraging I've already
mentioned, the multiplication of wives, chapter three, verse
one, and then chapter 11, versus one and following. I mean, he
had a lot of wives, and they led his heart away from the living
and the true God. That was the specific requirement
in Deuteronomy chapter 7. Do not marry with them, because
if you marry with them, you're going to be worshiping with them
before long. That's the reason why. What does
Deuteronomy 13 say? If the wife of your own bosom
entices you away from Yahweh your God, then you shall have
her put to death. Seduction to apostasy or idolatry
was a capital offense in Old Covenant Israel. And here we
see the king of Israel multiplying wives in a nauseating manner. So there
is encouragement, but there is discouragement in terms of the
reign of Solomon. A fourth theme that we ought
to appreciate in the book is the Davidic Covenant. The Davidic
Covenant, in fact, turned to 2 Samuel 7. It's good to have
that before our eyes so that we understand why the book ends
the way that it does, 2 Kings. Notice in 2 Samuel 7 verse 11,
the very end, also the Lord tells you that He will make you a house. Again, this is a dynasty. Verse
12, when your days are fulfilled and you rest with your fathers,
I will set up your seat after you who will come from your body,
and I will establish His kingdom. He shall build a house for My
name, and I will establish the throne of His kingdom forever.
I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commits
iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men and with
the blows of the sons of men. But my mercy shall not depart
from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I removed from before you.
And your house and your kingdom shall be established forever
before you. Your throne shall be established
forever." That's why when you get to say the prophet Ezekiel,
God through the prophet says, I will send David my king. What's
he talking about? He's talking about the Lord Jesus.
He's talking about the New Covenant. He's talking about the reality
that Christ fulfills what 2 Samuel 7 tells us, that God will, from
David's line, raise up one to sit upon the throne whose rule
and reign shall have no end. Now, when we look at the Davidic
Covenant, or we consider that particular theme, we understand
the utter apostasy and the utter failure of the Northern Kingdom.
But when we look at the line of Judah, there is this small
glimmer of hope that 2 Kings ends on. You can turn to 2 Kings
chapter 25. Now, when I say a small glimmer
of hope, It is a small glimmer of hope, but sometimes a small
glimmer of hope is all that one needs to keep going in the daily
grind. Notice in 2 Kings, forgive me,
I'm going to say Samuel probably for the next several weeks since
we've been in Samuel for so long, but notice in 2 Kings 25-27. Now it came to pass in the 37th
year of the captivity of Jehoiachin, king of Judah, in the 12th month,
on the 27th day of the month, that evil Meredok, king of Babylon,
in the year that he began to reign, released Jehoiachin, king
of Judah, from prison. He spoke kindly to him and gave
him a more prominent seat than those of the kings who were with
him in Babylon. So Jehoiachin changed from his
prison garments and he ate bread regularly before the king all
the days of his life. And as for his provisions, there
was a regular ration given him by the king, a portion for each
day all the days of his life. The Davidic line is not extinguished. It is not utterly snuffed out. Again, that's a small glimmer,
but it's a glimmer nevertheless. Ian Proven says, the future of
the Davidic line apparently hangs by the slender thread of a displaced
ruler sitting at the table of the king of Babylon. And Ralph
Davis says, it seems to me then that biblical theology would
lead us to see a ray of hope in this kindness done to the
exiled Davidic king. Again, it's very small, but nevertheless,
that Davidic covenant runs through this particular era. It will
indeed secure the arrival of the coming king, even our Lord
Jesus Christ. As well, another major theme
in the book are the prophets of God. I mean, if you have read
through 1st and 2nd Kings, we've got exciting stuff ahead of us,
don't we? I mean, you've got Elijah and
Elisha. I mean, these were men of God,
men that were faithful, men that stood up to the wickedness and
to the lawlessness of their age. One only need remember Elijah
on Mount Carmel fighting those prophets of Baal. Remember those
prophets at that time were state subsidized. They ate at the king's
table. They were on the government payroll
in Israel. So these were dark days in Israel's
history, and yet Elijah the Tishbite just shows up. In fact, look
at 1 Kings 17 for a moment. Truly an amazing way that he's
introduced to us. After an array of bad kings,
notice in 1701, and Elijah the Tishbite of the inhabitants of
Gilead said to Ahab, that's it, he's there. There's no, and Elijah
was raised to, you know, Betty and Johnny and he was brought
up on the catechism and he went to this school. He's just there. One man says, whenever evil flourishes,
it is always a superficial flourish. For at the height of the triumph
of evil, God will be there, ready with his man and his movement
and his plans to ensure that his own cause will never fail.
Now note, Elijah the Tishbite of the inhabitants of Gilead
said to Ahab, as the Lord God of Israel lives, before whom
I stand. I mean, that's an amazing statement
from this Tishbite. Before whom I stand. God sends his man to deal with
the situation facing Israel. And then just that one snippet
concerning Elisha, when those young, those lads mocked him
and called him baldy bean or bald head and he cursed them
and the she bears come out and kill that. Now when we get to
that, you're probably gonna have a bit of prejudice or some of
us have this prejudice that we have two and three year old little
boys that mock this prophet and he sent these she bears out to
devastate them. There's more going on than just
that. But these men were paradigmatic
or somewhat typical of men to come, Elijah, John the Baptist
is the Elijah in the New Covenant, and there are some very striking
parallels between Christ and Elisha, the prophet that we will
note when we get to the Elisha narrative. So the prophets of
God are another theme, and certainly it's the word of God that is
to hold sway in the hearts of God's kings and in the hearts
of God's people. And then finally, well not finally,
we got two more, the doctrine of God. The doctrine of God is
conspicuous throughout the book of Kings. In the first place,
His being. He is God alone and thus the
gods of the heathen are idols. That was a problem facing Israel
at this particular time. You had behind the scenes, or
rather around Israel, you had Egypt, you had Aram, or what
we call today Syria, you had Assyria and Babylon. These were
the competing powers against Israel at the time. Well, each
of them had their own collection of gods. And so Israelites would
go a whoring from the true and the living God. But God is God
alone, and thus the gods of the heathen are idols. Notice in
8.23, we didn't read that part, but he says, Lord God of Israel,
there is no God in heaven above or on earth below like you, who
keep your covenant and mercy with your servants, who walk
before you with all their hearts. He is God alone, and thus the
gods of the heathen are idols. He is the creator of heaven and
earth, 2 Kings chapter 19. 2 Kings chapter 19, specifically
verse 15. Then Hezekiah prayed before the
Lord and said, O Lord God of Israel, the one who dwells between
the cherubim, you are God, you alone of all the kingdoms of
the earth, you have made heaven and earth. You have made heaven
and earth. As well, God is the one who controls
nature. Now this is important to realize
or understand because the pagans thought Baal controlled nature. The pagans thought that Baal
brought rain. The pagans thought that Baal
was the cause for fruitfulness and for bounty with reference
to crops. In fact, one man, his last name
is Fully Love. I've never seen a name like that.
Fully Love is his name. I'm guessing he's full of love,
but he makes this observation. This is from a recent release. It's an introduction, a biblical
theological introduction to the Old Testament, and several authors
that take up different books, and this fellow takes up 1 and
2 Kings, but he makes this observation concerning the miracles that
are reported in the books of 1st and 2nd Kings. And Elijah
and Elisha do a lot of miracles. And he says, the miracles recounted
in Elijah and Elisha's stories are not as haphazard as they
may seem upon a casual reading. Instead, these miracles form
a polemic against Baal worship. Baal was the storm god, more
specifically with lightning as his weapon and rain as his blessing. Therefore, it is no accident
that fire from heaven is a key component of the miracles and
kings. Nor is it likely an accident that control of rain and provision
of water feature prominently in the miracles of kings. As
the supposed giver of rain, Baal would have been considered the
ultimate source of food. And not surprisingly, many of
the miracles and kings relate to the provision of food. Ugaritic
literature, Ugarit was an ancient city in Syria. Ugaritic literature
even discusses Baal's conquering of Judge River, his rival, while
both Elijah and Elisha can strike the Jordan and command it to
part. The Ugaritic Baal myth includes Baal rising from the
dead in an annual cycle, yet both Elijah and Elisha even raise
the dead. In the Elijah and Elisha narratives
then, God and his prophets are victorious, not just over wayward
kings, but even over other gods those kings follow. Anything
Baal is said to do is actually instead done by Yahweh's prophets. I thought that was a very interesting
observation and very fitting for our consideration of these
books tonight. And as well, he is the one who
controls history. As we saw, I think, repeatedly
in our studies in 1 and 2 Samuel, God is sovereign in providence.
God overrules history. God is the one who is in the
heavens, and He does whatever He pleases. And time and time
and time again, you will see that the Lord God is the controller
of the events that occur in the books of 1 and 2 Kings. As well, with reference, so in
terms of the doctrine of God, we see something concerning His
being, but as well His worship. his worship. We see and understand
something of the second commandment in the books of 1st and 2nd Kings.
God is a jealous God. He'll brook no rivals. You can't
have God and Baal. You can't have God and, you know,
Asherah. You cannot mix or mingle the
two. If you try and do that, you have
neglected, rejected, and resisted the living and the true God.
That'll come out over and over in the books of 1st and 2nd Kings.
As well, He is to be worshipped legitimately in terms of content. You're not supposed to worship
God with idols or images. Again, Deuteronomy is behind
the scenes in 1st and 2nd Kings. You're not supposed to, you know,
make calves or golden calves and set them up in order to divert
the attention of the northern kingdom. It's precisely what
Jeroboam did. And I think in terms of a worldly
or a carnal ploy, it made sense. Jeroboam realized that if the
northerners travel all the way to Jerusalem, they may be convinced
that what we're doing here is wrong. So that's why he puts
these calves up and ascribes to them that they are Yahweh
that brought them out of the land of Egypt. It was an attempt
to bring to the north Yahweh, but by doing so, it's an act
of idolatry. And as well, he is to be worshiped
legitimately in terms of place. Jerusalem, not in the high places. Remember, a primary concern in
the book of Deuteronomy, specifically chapter 12, was that Israel was
to have a central sanctuary. There was to be one place. God
didn't want Israel to worship wherever they hankered after
him. No, because he knew that if they worshiped wherever they
hankered after him, It might be Baal or it might be Asherah,
it might be Moloch, it might be some other form or some other
situation. There was a central sanctuary
designed to protect the integrity of Israel's worship. You are
not supposed to just entertain God on any high place. Then as
well, his judgment. That's something else that we
see that this book illustrates adequately. Note first, the fall
of the Northern Kingdom in 2 Kings 17. 2 Kings 17. The fall of the northern
kingdom was not due to the superiority of the Assyrian army. Note 2
Kings 17 at verse 13. Yet the Lord testified against
Israel and against Judah by all of his prophets, every seer saying,
turn from your evil ways and keep my commandments and my statutes
according to all the law which I commanded your fathers and
which I sent to you by my servants, the prophets. Nevertheless, they
would not hear, but stiffened their necks, like the necks of
their fathers, who did not believe in the Lord their God. And they
rejected His statutes and His covenant that He had made with
their fathers, and His testimonies which He had testified against
them. They followed idols, became idolaters, and went after the
nations who were all around them, concerning whom the Lord had
charged them that they should not do like them. So they left
all the commandments of the Lord their God, made for themselves
a molded image and two calves, made a wooden image and worshipped
all the hosts of heaven, and served Baal. And they caused
their sons and daughters to pass through the fire, practiced witchcraft
and soothsaying, and sold themselves to do evil in the sight of the
Lord, to provoke Him to anger. Therefore the Lord was very angry
with Israel and removed them from His sight. There was none
left but the tribe of Judah alone. Also, Judah did not keep the
commandments of the Lord their God, but they walked in the statutes
of Israel which they had made. And the Lord rejected all the
descendants of Israel, afflicted them, and delivered them into
the hand of plunderers until He had cast them from His sight.
For He tore Israel from the house of David, and they made Jeroboam
the son of Nebat king. Then Jeroboam drove Israel from
following the Lord and made them commit a great sin. where the
children of Israel walked in all the sins of Jeroboam which
he did, they did not depart from them until the Lord removed Israel
out of his sight as he had said by all his servants the prophets.
So Israel was carried away from their own land to Assyria as
it is to this day. You see, it was God. It wasn't
the Assyrians and their military savvy or superiority. It was
the judgment of God because the nation of Israel, specifically
the Northern Kingdom, had apostatized, they had defected, they had broken
the covenant of God Most High, and according to the covenant
curses, He sent them into exile. Notice in 2 Kings chapter 24.
2 Kings chapter 24. The fall of the southern kingdom
takes up 24 and 25, but just the first four verses in 2 Kings
24. In his days, Nebuchadnezzar,
king of Babylon, came up, and Jehoiakim became his vassal for
three years. Then he turned and rebelled against
him, and the Lord sent against him raiding bands of Chaldeans.
Remember I said he is the sovereign over history? Look who sends
the raiders. He sent, the Lord sent, against
him, raiding bands of Chaldeans, bands of Syrians, bands of Moabites,
and bands of the people of Ammon. He sent them against Judah to
destroy it, according to the word of the Lord, which He had
spoken by His servants, the prophets. Surely at the commandment of
the Lord this came upon Judah, to remove them from His sight
because of the sins of Manasseh, according to all that He had
done. and also because of the innocent blood that he had shed,
for he had filled Jerusalem with innocent blood, which the Lord
would not pardon." Remember, Jesus says this to the first-century
generation that he is speaking to. They had filled up the measure
of their father's guilt. All the blood of righteous Abel
of Zechariah will be required from that particular generation.
They had a long history and a long pedigree of violating the law
of God and breaking His commandments and breaking His covenant. So
the Northern Kingdom falls in 722, the Southern Kingdom falls
in 586, And then as the nation comes out of exile, Judah is
back in existence, the Christ comes from the line of David,
he comes to his own, his own receive him not, they ultimately
deliver him up to crucify him. And so that is when AD 70 occurs
to bring the judgment of God to bear upon them one last time
as a body politic, as a theocracy, as the special covenant people
of God. After AD 70, they enter into
the rank and file of every other nation. They are no better than
others. They are no worse than others.
They stand in need of the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Again,
this is fully love concerning the fall of the kingdoms. He
says, the author or compiler of the book than is giving, under
inspiration of God, an accurate theological take on events in
the history of God's people. I mean, if you were a bystander
and you saw Israel, the northern tribes, fall to Assyria, you'd
probably conclude that Assyria was the superior army. If you
saw that Judah fell to Babylon, you might conclude that Babylon
had a better army and Nebuchadnezzar was a better military commander.
This man says that Kings gives the theological rationale specifically
for the judgment that fell upon both North and South. He says,
that theological take is that God was justly judging His people
for their sin. Such a viewpoint would have competed
with other potential inferable explanations for the fall of
Israel and Judah, that they had made poor alliances or simply
had not won the geopolitical contest, or even possibly that
the people had failed to be sufficiently devoted to Baal. Instead, the
author is arguing that God's people were in exile because
God had willed it as a judgment for their disobedience to the
law, especially as presented in Deuteronomy. So it gives the
rationale behind the fall of the kingdoms. We know why. It's
not because God just woke up in a bad mood and thought He'd
dispatch the Assyrians and then the Babylonians. It's because
God sent prophet after prophet after prophet to prosecute His
holy law to these people. He called them to repentance.
Remember, this is a 400-year period. Never let anyone say
that this God in the Old Testament is just, you know, quick at the
trigger. No, He's long-suffering. He's
bearing. I sent my servants, the prophets,
to you. He bore long with them, but the
measure of their guilt had been filled up, so he sends these
raiders to bring the covenant curses to bear upon them, just
as Christ sends the Roman armies in 80-70 to bring the covenant
curses to bear upon them. It's the same sort of thing that
happens. God comes in judgment in the
Old Testament via Assyria and via Babylon. That's how we're
supposed to understand this coming that Jesus speaks of in Matthew
chapter 24. He comes in judgment. He's enthroned
at the right hand, but through historical means and through
providence, he brings judgment to bear upon Israel. And then
the final thing we ought to appreciate is Christ in the Kings, Christ
in the Book of Kings. Certainly every good king is
a type of our Lord Jesus. Solomon is a type of our Lord
Jesus. Remember, the type doesn't correspond
exactly to the anti-type, because then it wouldn't be a type-anti-type
relationship. Not everything that is true of
the antitype is necessarily true of the type. The type has certain
elements that point us to the antitype. And then Hezekiah,
Josiah, these other godly kings certainly typify what we find
in our Lord Jesus Christ. But also the temple. You know,
we have sought in the exposition in Matthew's Gospel to show that
Christ is the reason that the temple stood. The temple pointed
to the Lord Jesus. In fact, you can turn to Zechariah
chapter 6. Zechariah chapter 6. This is
post-exilic. This is after the Babylonian
captivity. And this is a prophecy concerning
our Lord Jesus in Zechariah chapter 6 at verse 12. And speak to him,
saying, Thus says the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man
whose name is the branch. From his place he shall branch
out, and he shall build the temple of the Lord. Yes, he shall build
the temple of the Lord. He shall bear the glory and shall
sit and rule on his throne. So he shall be a priest on his
throne and the council of peace shall be between them both. John
chapter two. John chapter two. You can look
there. Christ is the reason the temple
stood when Solomon built that earthly temple. It was to point
Israel to the Lord Jesus Christ. Notice in John two specifically
at verse So, the Jews answered and said to him, what sign do
you show to us since you do these things? Jesus answered and said
to them, destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise
it up. Then the Jews said, it has taken 46 years to build this
temple, and will you raise it up in three days? But he was
speaking of the temple of his body. Therefore, when he had
risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this
to them, and they believed the scripture and the word which
Jesus had said. Now if you didn't catch it the
other time or one of the times on Sunday, this theology of the
temple, Adam was a son of God charged with expanding the temple
of God. Adam failed. Israel comes and
they're a son of God, the firstborn son, and they're supposed to
build the temple and expand the knowledge of God and the glory
of God throughout the earth. You'll see that in Solomon's
prayer of dedication in 1 Kings 8. The temple wasn't simply to
be for Jerusalem, it was so that all the nations would see the
glory and the majesty of God. Well certainly, Adam was a sinless
son of God who fails in extending the temple of God. Israel is
a son of God who fails in extending the temple and the glory of God.
Christ is the son of God who builds the temple of God and
extends the glory of God throughout the cosmos. All of Scripture
is pointing us from the beginning to the end. It points us to Christ
as that temple, that one in whom God and sinners find this meeting
place. That's the glory of temple in
the Old Testament. It preaches to the people of
Israel and hopefully preaches to us the glory of Jesus Christ
as the one in whom God and sinners meet together. So that is Christ
in the Kings. I'm sure we'll see him many,
many more times as we move our way through these two wonderful
books of the Bible. We'll all close in a word of
prayer. Our Father, we thank You for Your Word, and we thank
You for not only history, but theological history, and the
things that You see are necessary for us in this new covenant setting.
Help us to appreciate these studies in the Old Testament. I pray
that all of us would be reading our Old Testaments. We know that
Jesus said these testify of Him. and give us grace and ears and
eyes and hearts to receive the truth as it is in Christ. And
may we be encouraged in our most holy faith, may we be strengthened
in it, and may we, as Michael prayed earlier, be bold witnesses
for the glory of Christ. Certainly we are to be living
lights in this crooked and perverse generation, and we are to hold
forth the word of truth. And if the task of Adam, realized
by Christ, is to expand or to extend the knowledge of God and
the glory of God, then use us as living stones in this temple
to do that very thing and to bring glory and praise to your
Most High Name. Go with us now, we pray, in Jesus'
name. Amen.