← Back to sermon library

Genesis 37:1-36

Jim Butler · 2020-01-08 · Genesis 37 · 8,062 words · 47 min

Genesis 37 at verse 1. Now Jacob 
dwelt in the land where his father was a stranger in the land of 
Canaan. This is the history of Jacob. Joseph, being 17 years 
old, was feeding the flock with his brothers. And the lad was 
with the sons of Billah and the sons of Zilpah, his father's 
wives. And Joseph brought a bad report 
of them to his father. Now Israel loved Joseph more 
than all his children because he was the son of his old age. 
Also he made him a tunic of many colors. But when his brothers 
saw that their father loved him more than all his brothers, they 
hated him and could not speak peaceably to him. Now Joseph 
had a dream and he told it to his brothers and they hated him 
even more. So he said to them, please hear 
this dream which I have dreamed. There we were, binding sheaves 
in the field. Then behold, my sheaf arose and 
also stood upright, and indeed your sheaves stood all around 
and bowed down to my sheaf. And his brothers said to him, 
shall you indeed reign over us, or shall you indeed have dominion 
over us? So they hated him even more for 
his dreams and for his words. Then he dreamed still another 
dream, and told it to his brothers, and said, Look, I have dreamed 
another dream. And this time the sun, the moon, 
and the eleven stars bowed down to me. So he told it to his father 
and his brothers, and his father rebuked him and said to him, 
What is this dream that you have dreamed? Shall your mother and 
I and your brothers indeed come to bow down to the earth before 
you? And his brothers envied him, 
but his father kept the matter in mind. Then his brothers went 
to feed their father's flock in Shechem. And Israel said to 
Joseph, Are not your brothers feeding the flock in Shechem? 
Come, I will send you to them. So he said to him, Here I am. Then he said to him, Please go 
and see if it is well with your brothers and well with the flocks, 
and bring back word to me. So he sent him out of the valley 
of Hebron, and he went to Shechem. Now a certain man found him, 
and there he was wandering in the field. And the man asked 
him, saying, What are you seeking? So he said, I am seeking my brothers. 
Please tell me where they are feeding their flocks. And the 
man said, They have departed from here. For I heard them say, 
Let us go to Dothan. So Joseph went after his brothers 
and found them in Dothan. Now when they saw him afar off, 
even before he came near them, they conspired against him to 
kill him. Then they said to one another, 
Look, the streamer is coming. Come, therefore, let us now kill 
him and cast him into some pit, and we will say, Some wild beast 
has devoured him. We shall see what will become 
of his drains. But Reuben heard it, and he delivered him out 
of their hands and said, let us not kill him. And Reuben said 
to them, shed no blood, but cast him into this pit, which is in 
the wilderness, and do not lay a hand on him, that he might 
deliver him out of their hands and bring him back to his father. 
So it came to pass when Joseph had come to his brothers that 
they stripped Joseph of his tunic, the tunic of many colors that 
was on him. Then they took him and cast him into a pit, and 
the pit was empty. There was no water in it. and 
they sat down to eat a meal. Then they lifted their eyes and 
looked, and there was a company of Ishmaelites coming from Gilead 
with their camels, bearing spices, balm, and myrrh, on their way 
to carry them down to Egypt. So Judas said to his brothers, 
What profit is there if we kill our brother and conceal his blood? 
Come and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our 
hand be upon him, for he is our brother in our flesh." And his 
brothers listened. Then Midianite traders passed 
by, so the brothers pulled Joseph up and lifted him out of the 
pit, and sold him to the Ishmaelites for 20 shekels of silver, and 
they took Joseph to Egypt. Then Reuben returned to the pit, 
and indeed Joseph was not in the pit. And he tore his clothes. 
And he returned to his brothers and said, The lad is no more, 
and I, where shall I go? So they took Joseph's tunic, 
killed a kid of the goats, and dipped the tunic in the blood. 
Then they sent the tunic of many colors, and they brought it to 
their father and said, We have found this. Do you know whether 
it is your son's tunic or not? And he recognized it and said, 
It is my son's tunic. A wild beast has devoured him. 
Without doubt, Joseph is torn to pieces. Then Jacob tore his 
clothes, put sackcloth on his waist, and mourned for his son 
many days. And all his sons and all his 
daughters arose to comfort him. But he refused to be comforted, 
and he said, for I shall go down into the grave to my son in mourning. 
Thus his father wept for him. Now the Midianites had sold him 
in Egypt to Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh and captain of the 
guard. Amen. Well, as I said, this indeed 
engages the history of Jacob, the focus primarily on Joseph 
in terms of chapter 37. to chapter 50. Now the specific 
events related to Joseph, the favorite son of Jacob, is in 
fact the primary concern. And then the hatred of Joseph's 
brothers toward him sets the stage for the entire situation. If you notice in verses 4, 5, 
and 8, it indicates that they hated him. And then again in 
verse 11, his brothers envied him, but his father kept the 
matter in mind. So in verses 1 to 11, we have 
the dream of Joseph, or the dreams of Joseph, and then secondly, 
the treachery of Joseph's brothers in verses 12 to 36. So they not 
only hate him, but they actually act upon that enmity, they act 
upon that hatred, and they engage in the wickedness that is outlined 
in this particular chapter. So, let's look first at the dream 
of Joseph in verses 1 to 11 and the setting. Notice in verses 
1 to 4, as said, it is in fact the history of Jacob. There's 
a contrast as well between the sons of the Edomites who are 
dwelling in the land of Seir. They are in chapter 36. Verse 
1 tells us in chapter 37, Jacob dwelt in the land where his father 
was a stranger in the land of Canaan. So they are in the promised 
land at this particular juncture. This is the terminus for their 
travels, and this is where they're supposed to be. Obviously, this 
narrative illustrates for us how they ended up in Egypt. When 
we turn to the first chapter of the book of Exodus, we see 
that Israel is dwelling in Egypt, and the Joseph narratives indicate 
the reason for that. And then it tells us about the 
favorite son of Jacob in verses 1, B to 3. Notice that Joseph, 
at this particular time, is 17 years old. He is present with 
the sons of Billah and Zilpah. This is Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and 
Asher. These were the sons of the handmaidens. And then notice that he gives 
this bad report concerning them to his father. Now, we don't 
know what that bad report is. There's all kinds of speculation 
about that bad report, and some of it is really bad stuff. I'm 
not sure how that all originated, if it was outside or extra-biblical, 
perhaps Jewish history sort of attaching to this. But what we 
do know is that Joseph dined them out. For whatever reason, 
they weren't doing something properly, and he told on them, 
and then they got upset with him. As well, the text indicates 
his favored status by Jacob. Notice in verse 3, now Israel, 
this is Jacob, loved Joseph more than all his children because 
he was the son of his old age. Remember that Jacob's name is 
changed into Israel, but it does kind of go back and forth. When 
Abram becomes Abraham, it sticks. But with reference to Jacob, 
it does kind of go back and forth from Jacob to Israel. Wenham 
has a very helpful paragraph on why that may be the case. 
If you're interested, email me and I'll send you that particular 
quote. But here we see that Joseph is in fact the favored one, and 
that shouldn't surprise us, because Jacob favored Joseph's mother. Jacob loved Rachel. He didn't 
love Leah in the same way, and he certainly didn't love the 
handmaidens in the same manner as well. He loved Rachel preeminently. Wenham says that favoritism has 
a long pedigree in Jacob's family. Isaac loved Esau more than Jacob. Rebecca loved Jacob more than 
Esau. And most pointedly, Jacob loved 
Rachel more than Leah. His old love for Rachel is now 
transferred to Joseph, Rachel's son. So that's the emphasis there 
in verse 3, and obviously this does not produce good morale 
amongst the other brothers. The other brothers are upset 
about this being sort of slighted by Jacob relative to their brother 
Joseph. And then notice as well that 
he has this coat or this tunic of many colors. And this is obviously 
an emblem or a symbol or some sort of a tangible representation 
of Jacob's love and esteem for Joseph, that he is in fact the 
favored one. Some of the commentators suggest 
that this also indicates that Joseph would get the blessing 
associated with the firstborn. Remember that Reuben went into 
one of Jacob's wives, and therefore he's on the outs. So some speculate 
that this tunic of many colors was indicative that he would 
receive the blessing that should have or would have gone to Reuben 
had he not engaged in the sort of wickedness that he had done. 
So we've got favoritism at play, and then we see the other sons 
of Jacob in verse 4. It says, when his brothers saw 
that their father loved him more than all his brothers, they hated 
him and could not speak peaceably to him. So they have the internal 
disposition of hatred toward him, but it's manifested externally. There's probably a case where 
someone hates another person and yet nevertheless is able 
to be civil with them. At this particular point, though, 
they can't speak peaceably to him. They cannot stand him. I think that's the emphasis we're 
supposed to take from the text. They utterly despise him. So that when we get to the latter 
part of the chapter, when they're fomenting murder, and they're 
fomenting leaving him ultimately in a pit to starve to death and 
to die of dehydration, this evidences the reality that what it's saying 
here in verses 4, 5, and 8 is legit. These men hated Joseph. They detested him. That brings 
us to Joseph's dreams. This does not help his cause. 
Some suggest that Joseph was kind of carrying on like a spoiled 
little brat. I'm not sure the text manifests 
that. I'm not certain what the negative 
report was that he brought concerning his brothers. It could have been 
the case that he was a spoiled little brat. But all that to 
say, everything that is happening is conspiring in the minds of 
these brothers to utterly detest and despise their brother, Joseph. He's got these two dreams, and 
both of the dreams basically mean the same thing. Later on, 
the two dreams given to Pharaoh are indicated as an identifier 
that the thing will in fact come to pass. So the message of the 
dream relative to the sheaf and the message relative to the dream 
with reference to the sun, moon, and the stars, the same idea 
is in view. Joseph will be preeminent over 
his brothers and over his father and his mother. That's the emphasis 
here with reference to the sheaf and with reference to the sun, 
moon, and stars. Now notice that the passage never 
says that the dreams came from God. It doesn't say that Joseph 
went, laid down, and then the Lord spoke to him via a dream. Now the fact that these things 
come to pass, and it does accurately foreshadow the subsequent dealings 
of God with reference to Joseph, we can infer that the dreams 
did in fact come from God, but it's different than, the Lord 
spoke to this particular man in a dream. The text does not 
specify that, the text does not identify that. But with reference 
to the sheaf, notice in verse 5, Joseph had a dream and he 
told it to his brothers, and they hated him even more, before 
he even told them the contents of the dream. I mean, everything 
he's saying is just bringing their blood to boil. And then 
he said to them, please hear this dream which I have dreamed. 
There we were binding sheaves in the field. Now some would 
suggest they wouldn't have done this because they were shepherds. 
I don't think that a shepherd is completely immune to having 
to plant things from time to time. And as well it does foreshadow 
the reality that they will go to Egypt in search of grain and 
Joseph will be the one that delivers it to them. But he goes on, verse 
seven. There we were, binding sheaves 
in the field. Then, behold, my sheaf arose 
and also stood upright, and indeed your sheaves stood all around 
and bowed down to my sheaf. And as we might expect, according 
to verse 8, his brothers said to him, Shall you indeed reign 
over us? Or shall you indeed have dominion 
over us? So they hated him even more for 
his dreams and for his words. So they've already got this detestation 
of the lad, and now he says, I've had a dream, and you're 
all going to bow down to me. You can understand. We can't 
condone, because it's hatred, and that's a sin against God. 
But you can understand their response as to why they would 
be increasingly upset at this point. They don't know God's 
plan. They don't know how things are going to fall out. They don't 
know that ultimately they're going to be dependent upon Joseph 
for life. They are going to need him, and 
in a sense will in fact bow down to him. And then that brings 
us to the second dream, verses 9 to 11. It says, He dreamed 
still another dream, and told it to his brothers, and said, 
Look, I have dreamed another dream, and this time the sun, 
the moon, and the eleven stars bowed down to me. Now, I would 
love to not have this on, because I'd like to ask, what is the 
significance of sun, moon, and stars in biblical literature? And hopefully someone would say, 
well, it means nations, oftentimes associated with politics, the 
fall of nations, the rise of nations. And I would say you're 
absolutely, positively right. Matthew 24, 29 indicates that 
in the Olivet Discourse. But Jesus is reflecting upon 
the grammar of prophecy that we see all throughout the Old 
Testament, and this language of sun, moon, and stars very 
often has to do with political entities, the rise and the fall 
of kingdoms. And again, in this particular 
situation, the idea is that Joseph will be preeminent over his family, 
and that is what the Lord is going to do in the midst of this 
particular family. So he has this dream, and now 
notice that Jacob is involved, and Jacob rebukes him because 
of this. Verse 10 says, So he told it 
to his father and his brothers, and his father rebuked him and 
said to him, What is this dream that you have dreamed? Shall 
your mother and I and your brothers indeed come to bow down to the 
earth before you? Now, as far as his mother, Rachel, 
is dead at this particular point. Some say, well, there's a big 
problem in the biblical narrative. It could simply mean the entirety 
of Jacob's household, or it could be a reference to Leah. Leah 
would have been the stepmother of Joseph at this particular 
time. But the point is, is that Jacob 
understood the significance of the dream. He understood what 
Joseph was asserting. And the way that this first one 
concerning the sheath incensed or upset his brothers, here we 
see that Jacob has a remnant of that as well. He rebukes him 
as a result of it. And of course, the brothers are 
upset according to verse 11. But then notice at the end of 
verse 11, but his father kept the matter in mind. So on the 
one hand, he rebukes him, but on the other hand, he is not 
going to cut him off, and he is not going to disallow the 
possibility that God is going to do something like that with 
Joseph and bring him to a place of prominence and preeminence. 
So Jacob, in a sense, is hedging his bets. He rebukes the boy, 
but at the same time, he ponders and he keeps it in mind to see 
what the Lord will, in fact, do. And that brings us, secondly, 
to the treachery of Joseph's brothers. And this is some treachery, 
brothers and sisters. Oftentimes, you know, in our 
Christian lives, we go through various trials, or we have various 
hardships, or various afflictions. In fact, it might be, you know, 
personal illness. Well, the Bible affords examples 
of people that were ill, and had tough times, and sorrowful 
afflictions, and so we can sort of enter in, and we can see the 
comfort of God in those particular instances. Some of us, or all 
of us probably at one time or another, have issues with reference 
to our families. And we think, oh, nobody really 
has the kinds of family problems that I have. Well, Joseph had 
bigger family problems than you or I could even imagine. We didn't 
have nine brothers who wanted to murder us. We didn't have 
nine brothers who wanted to leave us in a pit to starve to death 
and to dehydrate. When you ponder the implications 
involved in this, this was in fact great hatred. Now remember, 
we're dealing with the covenant community. We're dealing with 
the elect of God. We're dealing with the people 
carved out or set aside by the Lord, the vehicle through whom 
Messiah is ultimately going to come. Now, this kind of treachery, 
you would think, would be confined to the pagans. As Calvin reminds 
us, or Calvin says, and I'm going to quote it in just a moment, 
pagan literature doesn't even contain an example or a story 
where nine brothers are trying to terminate their youngest brother. And a kid at that, 17, I mean, 
he may have been a spoiled little brat, again, I'm not sure, but 
give him a few years. Nobody at 17's got it sort of 
all sorted out, do they? I mean, we cut a lot of slack 
to a 17-year-old, I hope, and I think, because we realize that 
there's a lot of things that they haven't... They haven't 
entered into yet. Their brains haven't even matured. 
They're not even sort of engaged in the fullness of life, so we 
cut them a little slack. They cut no slack to this young 
man whatsoever. So let's look first at the search 
for the brothers in verses 12 to 17. Now it is intriguing because 
Jacob says that they are feeding their flock in Shechem. Now Shechem 
was about 50 miles away. That's not the interesting thing. 
The interesting thing is they had just slaughtered all the 
men of Shechem. They're going back to Shechem. 
They must be pretty confident that the job they had undergone 
actually took and that they would not be under threat of punishment 
by any remaining Shechemites or anybody that was in those 
cities around there. So they go back to Shechem, and 
Jacob wants Joseph to go and check on them. Notice the contours 
in verse 14. So he sent him out of the valley 
of Hebron, and he went to Shechem. Now, Jacob probably knows that 
his sons aren't the happiest family on the face of the earth. 
He probably knows that there is a bit of tension that obtains 
between the sons, but he obviously does not know the sort of hatred 
that these men have toward Joseph, or he would have never sent Joseph 
into this particular situation. In fact, when they send back 
that blood-soaked tunic to Jacob, he does not for a moment think 
that the brothers offed Joseph. He immediately concludes that 
Joseph was done in by a beast of the field. So whatever tension 
may have been in the context of these brothers, Jacob perhaps 
knew something of it, but he didn't know the depth, he didn't 
know the degree, and probably he wouldn't have wanted to. I 
think as parents we don't want to know just how bad our children 
are. There's a sense where we don't 
want to explore the depths of their depravity. Perhaps that's 
something involved here. He knows there's tension, he 
knows there's problems, but he doesn't suspect it so bad that 
they're going to throw his son into a pit and leave him for 
dead, ultimately selling him into slavery. So Jacob, or Joseph 
rather, goes and does what he's supposed to, and when he gets 
to Shechem, he's there wandering, and then he must go to Dothan, 
which I think is about 15 miles away from there. And so the text 
is really wonderful in creating this distance and this separation. 
This 17-year-old boy, basically, treks these 50 miles, looks for 
his brothers, cannot find them. There's this fellow standing 
there. Some suspect that he was an angel. I don't see any indication 
in the text to sort of go that way. But this man says, your 
brothers went up to Dothan. So then he goes there. He doesn't 
go back to Jacob and says, well, I went to Shechem, I looked for 
them, and they weren't there. No, Joseph shows himself. an 
obedient son. He not only goes to Shechem, 
but then he goes to Dothan because his father wanted him to check 
on his brothers. Now notice the treachery of the 
brothers in verses 18 to 30. We see first the brothers' plot 
in 18 to 20. I think, again, the art of biblical 
narrative, this coat of many colors introduced in verse 2 
and 3, also is the reason why they recognize him from this 
distance. And the fact that he's wearing 
it, again, may not owe to the fact that he's the brightest 
bulb in the chandelier if he knows that his brothers don't 
like him. and he continues to wear this thing that's sort of 
emblematic of his father's favoritism over him, you know, somebody 
might have been wise to take him aside and say, you know, 
maybe don't do that, because you're going to exacerbate your brothers 
or whatever. But the fact is, is that he's 
wearing it, and they spy, or they see, rather, what's happening. They recognized him when he was 
a far off, according to verse 18. Now, when they saw him a 
far off, even before he came near them, they conspired against 
him to kill him. Then they said to one another, 
look, this dreamer is coming. Come, therefore, let us now kill 
him and cast him into some pit, and we shall say some wild beast 
has devoured him. We shall see what will become 
of his dreams. They wanted to neutralize him, 
and they wanted to remove any thought whatsoever of his dreams. This dreamer, this master of 
dreams, this one who thinks that he's going to be over us, we're 
going to kill him, and then we'll see what happens to his dreams. 
Then we'll see if our sheaves bow down to his sheave, or we'll 
see if the sun, moon, and stars bow down to him. It's just not 
going to happen if we take him out of play, if we kill him. They've already concocted this 
alibi that will, in fact, be utilized later when they report 
to Jacob that a wild beast has destroyed him, and that's not 
uncommon in this part of the world at this particular time. 
It would have been a real threat and a real issue that Joseph 
could have confronted along the way. Now notice the intervention 
by Reuben in verses 21 and 22. Now some suggest, or at least 
all the older commentators suggest, this was probably Reuben's attempt 
to appease his father for his having gone into Bilhah. Remember, 
he violated his father's concubine. That was a big bad no-no. And 
this is perhaps his attempt to get back into his father's good 
graces. And Calvin has a good helpful 
note there as well. Something to the effect that 
we don't judge a man based on one event in his life. Now, this 
was a pretty bad event in terms of Reuben going into Billah, 
but he was seeking to be faithful. He was seeking to do the right 
thing. And in this instance, that is precisely the case. So 
verse 21 tells us Reuben heard it. Reuben is the oldest of them 
all. Reuben is the oldest son of Leah. He's the firstborn. And certainly 
he would have felt a keen responsibility to look after his younger brothers, 
especially Joseph, because he knew that Jacob favored him. So Reuben heard it, and he delivered 
him out of their hands, and said, Let us not kill him. And Reuben 
said to them, Shed no blood, but cast him into this pit which 
is in the wilderness, and do not lay a hand on him. Now they 
interpret Reuben this way. Don't actually cut his throat, 
just throw him in a pit. As far as they're concerned, 
we're going to let him starve to death. As far as we're concerned, 
we're going to let him dehydrate. As far as we're concerned, that's 
it. We don't have to actually bloody 
our hands. We can just let him die the slow, 
agonizing, painful death. They don't know that Reuben's 
plan is to ultimately deliver him from their hand and bring 
him safely back to Jacob. They don't understand this. They 
simply agree to Reuben at this particular point. So Reuben intervenes 
to stay their hand from immediately killing him. He says, throw him 
into a pit. And the end of verse 22 indicates 
Reuben's plan, that he might deliver him out of their hands 
and bring him back to his father. Now, they like this particular 
plan. Notice in verses 23 and following. We have the brothers agree with 
Reuben. Verse 23, it came to pass when 
Joseph had come to his brothers that they stripped Joseph of 
his tunic, the tunic of many colors that was on him. Then 
they took him and cast him into a pit, and the pit was empty, 
there was no water in it. Now in terms of the pit, Why 
is there a pit there? Well, Waltke explains that archaeologists 
have found a large number of cisterns all over Israel. This was necessary in a dry and 
arid climate, a place to store water in the wilderness. He says 
there are large bottle-shaped pits hewn out of rock for retaining 
water. They range from 6 to 20 feet 
in depth. A dried out cistern makes a wonderful 
dungeon." And that is precisely what they do with him. They throw 
him into this pit. Now, the text is conspicuous 
at the end of verse 24. The pit was empty. There was 
no water in it. That indicates, on the one hand, 
that he wouldn't drown. But on the other hand, he would 
dehydrate. There's no water there. And these 
brothers aren't going to leave him any rations. They're not 
going to care for him. They didn't develop or make a 
system to sort of feed water into this. They're going to leave 
him for dead. That's the treachery of Joseph's 
brothers at this particular point. Now, verse 25 is sick. Verse 
25 is a real sick commentary on the heart of man. Notice the 
first part. It says, and they sat down to 
eat a meal. That's just horrendous behavior 
on the part of these people. Calvin says this was astonishing 
barbarity that they could quietly feast while in intention they 
were guilty of their brother's death. For had there been one 
drop of humanity in their souls, they would have at least have 
felt some inward compunctions. Yea, commonly the very worst 
men are afraid after the commission of a crime. That's pretty typical. I mean, the most wretched person 
out there feels bad at times for having done what they've 
done. Not so Joseph's brothers, he's in the pit and they sat 
down to eat a meal. Now turn for just a moment to 
Genesis 42. Genesis 42. I think this exacerbates it because 
it's not the case that Joseph was silent in the bottom of the 
pit while they enjoyed their sandwiches. In Genesis 42, specifically 
at verse 21, then they said to one another, we are truly guilty 
concerning our brother, for we saw the anguish of his soul when 
he pleaded with us, and we would not hear. So they're sitting 
at the edge of the pit, enjoying their lunch, and Joseph is in 
the bottom of the pit, in anguish of soul, pleading with them for 
release. So back to Genesis chapter 37. 
If we learn at least one lesson in this chapter, we ought to 
learn the doctrine of total depravity. Total depravity is a reality. It began post-fall. from the 
garden, and certainly all of us are affected by it. Now, total 
depravity doesn't mean we're as bad as we could possibly be. Total depravity simply means 
that every part of us is affected by sin. But in some instances, 
total depravity does actually mean they're as bad as they could 
be. And this may be one of those instances. Well, they're feasting, 
they're enjoying, their brother's in the bottom of the pit, and 
he's in anguish of soul, and he's crying out for release, 
and yet they continue to munch their sandwiches. Now, notice 
what Judah proposes. Judah, another brother, the son 
of Leah, Verse 25, they sat down to eat a meal. Now, there's three 
groups of people mentioned, Ishmaelites, Midianites, and Medanites. There's harmony for this. We're 
not going to get into all that. Suffice it to say, they were 
foreign travelers heading on their way to Egypt. That's the 
easiest explanation. And if you want sort of the details 
on these three groups, you can read John Gill. He'll guide you 
by the hand and teach you all about Ishmaelites, Midianites, 
and Medanites, as he does just about everything else. So, back 
to verse 25. Good old money, right? What profit 
is there? There's no benefit. There's no 
gain. We can make some dough if we 
play our cards right. There's a few shekels in this 
man. And the price, the 20 shekels, is consistent with what you'll 
find later in the book of Leviticus in terms of the price for a slave. 
So this is consistent with what we'll find later, but that's 
what drives Judah at this point. What profit is there if we kill 
our brother and conceal his blood? Now notice verse 27. This is 
one of those things where you wonder, how does somebody say 
a certain thing without exploding? Or, you know, I think you see 
it a lot in politics. You see it, you know, in some 
statements that people say that are absolutely, positively outlandish. Look at what Judas says here 
in verse 27. Come and let us sell him to the 
Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him, for he is our 
brother and our flesh. Come on, you're really gonna 
go there? He is our brother and our flesh? 
As you're munching your sandwich and he's begging to get out from 
the pit, and you're contemplating making 20 shekels from the cell 
of him to these Midianites so they can take him down to Egypt? You're gonna invoke this on us? Well, in terms of this lot, this 
was a good thing. We'll make some money, and after 
all, he is our brother and our flesh. And his brothers listen. 
Verse 28, then Midianite traders passed by, so the brothers pulled 
Joseph up and lifted him out of the pit and sold him to the 
Ishmaelites for 20 shekels of silver, and they took Joseph 
to Egypt. Again, I can't even imagine this. 
You know, again, we have family issues, we have trials, we have 
problems, and I'm not wanting to minimize that. It's not that, 
you know, any family is perfect. Every family has their challenges. 
But I think the biblical narrative is suggestive to us in this particular 
way. Whatever problem we may think 
we have, somebody else has had it before us, and the Lord has 
sustained them, and the Lord has blessed them, and the Lord 
has seen them through this. Now, it's not going to be the 
case that we have problems in our family, and then we're going 
to end up second in charge in Egypt. That's probably not going 
to happen. But the reality is that God's people in a sin-cursed 
world definitely butt heads with others. There are definite issues 
and challenges along the way, whether it be family issues, 
whether it be sickness, whether it be affliction or trial or 
tribulation, whatever the case may be, God's Word is not the 
kind of thing where it hides that reality. It tells us flat 
out, back in the upper room, Jesus said, in this world you 
will have tribulation, but be of good cheer, I've overcome 
the world. We need to appreciate and understand that, and we need 
to feed our souls on scripture when we come to these challenges 
and when we come to these trying situations. So the desire for 
financial gain and the outlandish nod to filial responsibility 
prevails with them. They sell Joseph. Now, Reuben 
returns and he's distressed, according to verses 29 and 30. 
Remember, he's come to deliver Joseph from the hand of his brothers 
and to take him back home to Jacob. So Reuben is upset and 
rightly so. Verse 30, he returned to his 
brothers and said, the lad is no more. And I, where shall I 
go? And that brings us finally concerning 
to the report given to Jacob. They go with their original alibi, 
verse 31. So they took Joseph's tunic, 
killed a kid of the goats, and dipped the tunic in the blood. 
Now there's great irony here if you've been paying attention. 
As Robert Alter says, Jacob himself had used both a slaughtered kid 
and a garment in the deception he perpetrated on his own father. You see a lot of that sort of 
connectivity in the biblical narrative. Genesis is masterful 
in that way. There's a lot of thematic connection. There's a lot of sort of word 
interplay, there's a lot of things going on in the narrative that 
connects us to other parts, either before or after. So Jacob used 
a slaughtered kid in a garment to pull off a deception with 
reference to Isaac. These sons of Jacob are doing 
the same thing now to deceive Jacob with reference to the status 
of his son Joseph. And then notice, it is intriguing. The end of verse 32, we have 
found this. Do you know whether it is your 
son's tunic or not? Now, none of the commentators 
I read dealt with this, but it's always intrigued me that Jacob 
guessed exactly what they wanted him to. I mean, I guess it was 
common, and persons did die by wild beasts. And I guess if you 
send your 17-year-old off to 50-mile John to Shechem, and 
then maybe another 15 miles to Dothan, Yeah, he might likely 
get attacked by an animal, but this is precisely what Jacob 
responds with. He recognized it, verse 33, and 
said, it is my son's tunic. A wild beast has devoured him. 
Without doubt, Joseph is torn to pieces. Now, I think, as a 
parent, I might want to verify things a little bit more, but 
I guess, in this context, it was different. He's not necessarily 
going to go searching for the dead body of his son, Joseph, 
so he goes along with this particular alibi, and this produces in Jacob 
great mourning. He is distressed over this. Remember 
that Joseph is, in fact, his favored one, and now the favored 
one is gone, so this promotes in him great great mourning on 
his part. Verse 34, Jacob tore his clothes, 
put sackcloth on his waist, mourned for his son many days, and all 
his sons and all his daughters arose to comfort him. Again, 
another interesting thing. The only daughter we know of 
at this point with reference to Jacob is Dinah. That's the 
only one that's been specified. That doesn't mean there weren't 
others. The text pluralizes daughters, so it must be the case that he 
had additional daughters. But he refused to be comforted 
and he said, for I shall go down into the grave to my son in mourning. Thus his father wept for him. 
And then verse 36 ends the narrative this way. Now the Midianites 
had sold him in Egypt to Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh. excuse 
me, and captain of the guard, which will become very important 
information for everything that follows in the Joseph narrative. 
Chapter 38 is going to deal with Judah and Tamar. Chapter 39 gets 
back to Joseph and carries on all the way to chapter 50. Well, 
in conclusion, by way of a couple of practical thoughts, in the 
first place, the doctrine of total depravity, the brother's 
hatred for Joseph. I think this is a great sort 
of indicator for each of us as to why we need to guard our hearts. 
The sixth commandment is what is violated when we hate people. 
We're not supposed to hate people. That's a sin against God. We're not supposed to necessarily 
be best friends for life with everybody we ever meet. I just 
don't think that's a possibility. We're not supposed to hate people. 
Well, these men hated their brother. They disdained and despised him, 
and then that grew in their hearts, and then it was externalized 
in the way that they treated him. That hatred led to their 
desire to engage in what's called fratricide. They wanted to murder 
their brother. They wanted to dispatch their 
brother, and the hatred led to their actual selling of Joseph 
into slavery. Now remember, they did not kill 
him because they had a change of heart. They just said, well, 
that is a bit harsh. Now Judah obviously said, he 
is our brother, he is our flesh. But that's after he already primed 
the pump with reference to, hey, we can get some money out of 
this. There's some profit. Why waste a good 20 shekels on killing this man? 
Let's sell him into slavery. Calvin again makes this observation. 
He says, if at any time among heathens a brother murdered his 
brother, such impiety was treated with the utmost severity in tragedies 
that it might not pass into an example for imitation. But in 
profane history, meaning outside the Bible, no such thing is found 
as that nine brethren should conspire together for the destruction 
of an innocent youth, and like wild beasts should pounce upon 
him with bloody hands. Therefore, a horrible and even 
diabolical fury took possession of the sons of Jacob. When having 
cast aside the sense of nature, they were thus prepared cruelly 
to rage against their own blood. Again, it starts off in the heart. It starts off as hatred. It starts 
off as this detestation of another person, but it doesn't typically 
end there. It vents itself out, or it's 
externalized in this passage by either A, wanting to kill 
him, or B, selling him into slavery. We need to guard our hearts. 
The sixth commandment is a reality. Secondly, in terms of the function 
of the dreams, the dreams function to sort of foreshadow what is 
going to happen. Look at what the text says in 
verse 36. The Midianites had sold him in 
Egypt to Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh and captain of the 
guard. We know the story. We know what's going to happen, 
and God is going to bless Joseph. These men and their sheaves are 
going to bow down to Joseph. The sun, the moon, and the stars 
are going to bow down to Joseph. He is going to be the second 
in command in all of Egypt, second only to Pharaoh. He is going 
to be called the ruler of all of Egypt. The man is preeminent 
as the narrative proceeds, and these dreams are the foundation 
of it. Now, thirdly, and probably most 
powerfully, is the providence of God in the chapter. Think 
about what these men are doing. They are trying to neutralize 
Joseph. They do not want these dreams 
actualized, but they are the vehicle by which the dreams do 
come to fruition and fulfillment. They deliver him into the hands 
of these Midianites, these foreign traders that are going down to 
Egypt. They are setting him up for the 
very exaltation that's going to take place in his life. When 
everything comes around, he says, ultimately, you meant this for 
evil, but God overruled it for good. Genesis 50, 20 is the key 
to the entirety of these narratives. Now, with reference to this, 
Wenham, I think, makes this great observation. He says, by selling 
Joseph into Egypt, his brothers have apparently disposed of him 
for good, but unwittingly they have actually helped the fulfillment 
of his dreams. Do you think they ever thought, 
well, if we just have killed him, I hope they wouldn't have 
thought that. But the thought is they sold him into this, and 
this is what transpires. Wenham also has a helpful note 
with reference to the providence of God. Christians, believers, 
Jews before us, always found great comfort in the Joseph narratives 
for that very reason, Genesis 50, 20. You meant this for evil, 
but God overruled it for good. Wenham says the story of Joseph 
shows how God's secret providence is behind the darkest deeds of 
men and works to their ultimate good. This whole section is a 
Romans 828. God does cause all things to 
work together for good. Now, fourthly, in terms of the 
flow of the book as a whole, I mean, this is a big block of 
text dedicated to Joseph and his brothers. And if we ask the 
question why, obviously it teaches us theological lessons concerning 
God's providence. But in terms of the storyline 
in Genesis, as I already mentioned, it does explain the reality as 
to how Israelites end up in Egypt. That is clear. Once there's famine 
in the land, They all go to Egypt because Jacob hears there's corn 
in Egypt, so the brothers go, and ultimately Jacob goes as 
well. So when we get to the book of Exodus, the Joseph narratives 
explain how Israel ended up in Egypt. As well, the Joseph story 
highlights the continued fulfillment of God's promise. Remember, God 
says that there would be a great seed. You go from 12 brothers 
to Exodus chapter 1, where you have 70 persons in all. So, this 
explains how we get there. And then the Joseph story demonstrates 
the blessing of God upon the nations through a patriarch. 
Remember, God said that to Abraham. In you, all the nations of the 
earth will be blessed. Well, Joseph is exalted to such 
a position that the nations around Egypt are flowing to Egypt so 
that they can be blessed by the presence of this patriarch in 
this particular scenario. And then the last thing, I'm 
gonna lean on Gil for this, the typological significance. Joseph 
is a type of Jesus Christ. Joseph is obviously a type of 
Christ, and I think John Gil nails this. And I'll just read 
it, it's extended, but it's wonderful. He says, Joseph was a most eminent 
type of Christ, and there are so many things in this chapter 
which show an agreement between them that cannot be passed over. 
Joseph was the son of his father's old age, Christ the son of the 
ancient of days. Joseph was in a peculiar manner 
beloved by his father. Christ is the dear son of his 
father's love. Jacob made for Joseph a coat 
of many colors. prepared a body and human nature 
for Christ, filled and adorned with the various gifts and graces 
of the Spirit without measure. Joseph was hated by his brethren, 
and they could not endure to think he should have the dominion 
over them. The Jews, of whom Christ was, according to the 
flesh, hated him and would not have him to reign over them. 
Joseph was sent by his father a long journey to visit his brethren 
and know the welfare of them and their flocks. Christ was 
sent from heaven to earth to seek and to save the lost sheep 
of the house of Israel. Joseph's brethren, when they 
saw him come to them, conspired to take away his life. The Jews, 
who were Christ's own, when he came to them, received him not, 
but said, This is the heir, let us kill him. And they consulted 
to take away his life. Joseph was stripped of his clothes 
and sold for 20 pieces of silver at the motion of Judah. And Christ, 
by one of the same name, was sold for 30 pieces of silver 
and was stripped of his clothes by the Roman soldiers. Joseph 
was delivered in the hands of foreigners and Christ into the 
hands of the Gentiles. Joseph being reckoned as dead 
by his father and yet alive may be herein an emblem of Christ's 
death and his resurrection from the dead. Amen. I think that 
the brother got that one right on, and that's a good place for 
me to close in prayer. Father, thank you for your word 
and thank you for these things that strengthen our faith and 
our resolve and encourage our hearts to realize that even in 
the midst of such dark and horrific situations, you are nevertheless 
working out your purposes for good, for those who love you, 
to those who are the called according to your purpose. Help us to understand 
these things. Help us to walk by faith. Help 
us in the midst of our own trials and afflictions and hardships 
to go to the sacred text and to find that encouragement with 
which you encouraged your people before. We ask that you would 
go with us now. We pray that you'd watch over 
our church. We pray for that family in Vernon, that you'd 
bless Phil and Karen Zogg. We pray that he would get the 
help that he needs and that you would just restore this brother 
in a in a timely manner that he'd be able to return to his 
wife and to his children. And we pray this through Jesus 
Christ our Lord. Amen.