The Fourth Commandment, Part 2
Studies in Deuteronomy
Deuteronomy chapter 5. Deuteronomy chapter 5 as we continue our study in the Ten Commandments. We're in the fourth commandment, verses 12 to 15. We started that last week. We're going to continue tonight and God willing finish it up next week. But I do want to read this section. beginning in chapter five, beginning at verse one. And Moses called all Israel and said to them, hear, O Israel, the statutes and judgments which I speak in your hearing today, that you may learn them and be careful to observe them. The Lord our God made a covenant with us in Horeb. The Lord did not make this covenant with our fathers, but with us, those who are here today, all of us who are alive. The Lord talked with you face to face on the mountain from the midst of the fire. I stood between the Lord and you at that time to declare to you the word of the Lord, for you were afraid because of the fire and you did not go up the mountain. He said, I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. "'You shall have no other gods before me. "'You shall not make for yourself a carved image, "'any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, "'or that is in the earth beneath, "'or that is in the water under the earth. "'You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. "'For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, "'visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children "'to the third and fourth generations of those who hate me, "'but showing mercy to thousands, "'to those who love me and keep my commandments. You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain. Observe the Sabbath day to keep it holy, as the Lord your God commanded you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. "'In it you shall do no work, you nor your son, "'nor your daughter, nor your male servant, "'nor your female servant, nor your ox, "'nor your donkey, nor any of your cattle, "'nor your stranger who is within your gates, "'that your male servant and your female servant "'may rest as well as you.' And remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord your God brought you out from there by a mighty hand and by an outstretched arm. Therefore, the Lord your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day. Honor your father and your mother, as the Lord your God has commanded you, that your days may be long and that it may be well with you in the land which the Lord your God is giving you. You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not bear false witness against your neighbor, you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, and you shall not desire your neighbor's house, his field, his male servant, his female servant, his ox, his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor's. These words, the Lord spoke to all your assembly in the mountain, from the midst of the fire, the cloud and the thick darkness with a loud voice. And he added no more. And he wrote them on two tablets of stone and gave them to me. Amen. Well, last week we looked at the exposition of the commandment. Notice first in verse 12, the positive aspect you are to observe. It's observed here in Deuteronomy and Exodus 20. It's remember, observe the Sabbath day to keep it holy as the Lord, your God commanded you. And then it's followed up with a prohibition. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work. So you've got the positive aspect, to keep the day holy, remember it, observe it, to keep it holy. And then the prohibition, make sure that you do no regular work on that particular day. And then we see the comprehensiveness of it. All of the animals, the beasts of burden, the servants, whether they're male or female, you're supposed to keep the day, you're supposed to give them that day of rest as well. And then the reason or the rationale here in verse 15 is, remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt. and the Lord your God brought you out from there by a mighty hand and by an outstretched arm. Therefore the Lord your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day." So redemption is the rationale for Sabbath keeping there in Deuteronomy. Remember last week we saw that in Exodus chapter 20, creation is the rationale for Sabbath keeping. So in Exodus 20 at verse eight, remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God." Continues on with the prohibition, and then in verse 11, the rationale, for in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day, therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it. So creation and redemption are the arguments or the reasons why persons are to obey this Fourth Commandment. We dealt with a lot of possible objections to obedience to the Fourth Commandment. Some come from what's called dispensational theology. They don't believe that the Ten Commandments are for the Church today. They think they're specifically for the Jews as Jews, and they're no longer binding upon us. Hopefully, we showed last week that that's not the case, that the Ten Commandments transcend. Whatever covenant you're in, whether you're in the Old Covenant, whether you're in the New Covenant, God's moral law binds all men in all ages. It doesn't matter whether you're a Jew or a Gentile, doesn't matter if you're black or you're white, doesn't matter if you're Canadian or African, what matters is that you're a creature under God and you owe him obedience to that moral law. So it's unchanging, it's trans-covenantal, and we saw that as we moved through the scriptures. We look then at the Sabbath in the Old Covenant. We started at creation, Genesis chapter 2 verses 1 to 3. That's the primary foundation. God created the earth and all things in it by the word of his power in the space of six days and all very good. And on that seventh day, he rested. On that seventh day, he sanctified it. That seventh day, he blessed it. And that rest there is not a cessation of labor because he was tired, but he was rejoicing and reflecting upon the good things that he had made. We then move to Genesis chapter 4. We see Cain and Abel present sacrifices at the end of days, at the end of the days of the week. They had learned about sacrifice from Adam, who learned about it from God, and then Adam taught them the specific day upon which they were to offer that sacrifice. We saw that. Then we looked at Exodus chapter 16, a Sabbath that was in play prior to the giving of the Ten Commandments at Sinai in Exodus chapter 20. Remember the instructions for gathering manna. They were supposed to gather up double portion on the sixth day so that they could rest on the seventh day. And then of course in Exodus 20 we see the giving of the law. not a brand new law, they were already told in Exodus 20 to remember that which had already been in place, established by God in Genesis, observed by Cain and Abel in Genesis, observed by the Israelites in Exodus chapter 16, and then in Exodus 20 they're told to remember it. We then looked at the Sabbath in the prophet Isaiah. specifically in chapters 56 and 58, prophecies concerning the New Covenant and the Messianic reign of our Lord Jesus Christ. And you see specifically Sabbath-keeping mentioned there in a favorable and positive light, both in chapters 56 and then again in chapter 58. And then we looked at Jeremiah 31 for the last text. And you can turn there because we're going to have cause to reflect upon it a bit more tonight. But Jeremiah chapter 31, it's an Old Covenant prophet prophesying concerning new covenant reality. So in Jeremiah 31, 31, he says, behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant, which they broke. So that's one of the first distinctions between the old and the new covenant. You could break the old covenant. The land would vomit out its inhabitants if they were unfaithful in that land. If they did not abide by God's law, and they transgressed his covenant, then they would end up exiled from the land. And that's specifically what happens in the Old Testament. Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus chapter 26 promised blessings for obedience and then curses for disobedience. So of course they disobey and they are cursed by God and they are ultimately exiled. So you could break the old covenant. But if you are truly in Jesus Christ, you're a believer in Jesus Christ, you cannot break that covenant. You are safe and secure, not because of what you have done, but because of what Christ has done. And He is the mediator of the new covenant, and as the Apostle says in Hebrews 7, He's the surety of a better covenant. So then he goes on to say, though I was a husband to them, says the Lord, verse 33, but this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord. I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts, and I will be their God and they shall be my people. No more shall every man teach his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord. For they all shall know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more." So these are essential features in New Covenant religion. If you are not forgiven of your sins, if you do not have an experiential knowledge of the Lord, if you don't have God's law internalized in your heart, then you're not a member of the New Covenant. In order to be a member of the New Covenant, you need to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ by God's grace. It's a gift given by Him. Trusting in Jesus, you receive the forgiveness of sins, you receive that imputed righteousness, and all the benefits that are specified here. So if you don't have this, you're not a part of the New Covenant. But if you do have this, you're in the New Covenant. And as I said, that New Covenant is inviolable or unbreakable. And then, as I pointed out, when he says, I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts, he's not speaking about a brand new law. He's speaking about the Ten Commandments. We know that because when we move to the New Testament, Jesus and the apostles treat the Ten Commandments differently than they treat the judicial law and they treat the ceremonial law. They treat the moral law as abiding and as valid and as applicable to all men in all ages. For instance, when the apostle wants to illustrate what love looks like in Romans chapter 13, he doesn't develop a new law. He simply goes back to the 10 commandments. If you want to love your neighbor, don't murder him. If you want to love your neighbor, don't commit adultery with his wife. If you want to love your neighbor, don't steal from him. And then in Ephesians chapter 6, he tells children, obey your parents and the Lord, for this is right. And then he says, honor your father and your mother, which is the first commandment with promise. So the Lord Jesus and the apostles treat the moral law differently than the ceremonial or judicial law, and they demonstrate that it does have trans-covenantal utility. In other words, it's applicable to all men in all ages. Irrespective of who you are or where you are in the continuum of time, you are subject to God's moral law. So that was our quick trip through the Old Testament. Now we turn to the Sabbath in the New Covenant. And there's a few things to consider here. First, we'll look at the ministry of Jesus Christ. Secondly, the resurrection of Christ. And then thirdly, the teaching of the apostles. We may not get through all of this, but we will try. But with reference to the ministry of our Lord, you can turn to Matthew's gospel, Matthew chapter 5. Matthew chapter 5, a passage that is very important for understanding the Lord Jesus Christ and his relation to the law. And I think that's why he says what he says in verses 17 to 20 in Matthew 5. His fame had gone out. People are now attracted to hear, want to hear what he is teaching. And probably the question has arisen, does he teach differently than what we have in Moses? Or is he consistent with Moses? So notice in 5, 17 to 20, and I think this is his hermeneutics or his approach to interpreting the Old Testament law, the law of God as given by Moses. So in verse 17, it says, do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say to you that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven." So his doctrine concerning the law, I want to consider his work. the work of the Lord Jesus Christ, his life, death, his resurrection, the work that he accomplished, the fulfillment of all that was written in the law and the prophets came to pass in our Lord Jesus. If you think about Old Testament prophecy and Old Testament passages, You see how they are fulfilled. So when he says, don't think that I came to destroy, but I came to fulfill, a lot hinges on this word fulfill. That's why I'm kind of dealing with it in some detail. So this idea of fulfill, we see the fulfillment of all that was written of him in the prophets. Deuteronomy 18, Moses or God through Moses promises that he's going to raise up a prophet like Moses, but not like Moses. And we know from the New Testament, specifically Acts chapter 3, and I would argue Matthew 17, that Jesus is the fulfillment of that Deuteronomy 18, 15 promise. That prophet that would be raised up is going to be the Lord Jesus Christ. So he fulfills that. 2 Samuel chapter 7, the Davidic Covenant, we see that Jesus fulfills that as well. Isaiah 9, we're all familiar with that at Christmas time. 6 and 7, it describes the Messiah and it describes His kingdom. Well, we know that that applies to the Lord Jesus Christ. Jeremiah 23 speaks of the Lord, our righteousness. Daniel chapter 9, the 70 weeks of Daniel. Jesus fulfills that. Micah 5, another incarnation text. Micah 5, 2. That refers to the Lord Jesus Christ. So in that sense, he fulfills all that was written of him in the prophets. When he says, do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. He fulfills everything that was prophesied of him in the old Testament. But as well, it points to his active obedience. And I think that we would hopefully all know what that means. Christ's obedience to the father's law in his life. As a man, as the mediator of the new covenant, he obeyed perfectly. He is our representative. He is our federal head. In fact, you can turn back to Matthew chapter three, where you see something of that in verse 13. Then Jesus came from Galilee to John at the Jordan to be baptized by him. And John tried to prevent him saying, I need to be baptized by you. And are you coming to me? But Jesus answered and said to him, permit it to be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness. Then he allowed him. And in many respects, that statement is a program in terms of how Jesus conducts himself. He always obeys the father. My meat is to do the will of him who sent me. So much so that Paul the Apostle can say in Romans 519, for as by one man's disobedience, speaking about Adam, many were made sinners, so also by one man's obedience, many will be made righteous. So Christ fulfills the law by being that which was prophesied in the Old Testament. Christ fulfills the law through his act of obedience in his life. Everything he does, he does in obedience to the Father's law. and then the fulfillment of even the ceremonial law in the sacrifice of himself. Again, his relation to the ceremonial law isn't to say it's bad, but it's to fulfill it in such a way that it's no longer binding. So we're not under that Old Covenant ceremonial law, where we have tabernacles, where we have temples, where we have priests, where we have sacrifices, where we have all those things that were part and parcel of Old Covenant worship. As Spurgeon says, he is himself the fulfillment and substance of the types and prophecies and commands of the law. So when he says, do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets, I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. We see that in his work. Again, Old Testament prophecy, his active obedience, and his fulfillment of the ceremonial law. But also in his doctrine, when he says, do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets, I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. Whatever fulfill means there, it cannot mean get rid of. Whatever fulfill means there, it cannot mean that no longer does Christian or do Christian people have anything to do with the law of God. Because if it did, it would make no sense in the context. Because beginning in verse 21, he goes on to expound the law. He goes on to expound its right interpretation. So if he means I came to fulfill so that it no longer obliges, then this makes no sense whatsoever. So the doctrine of Christ is that he fulfills the law and the prophets in that he teaches consistently with the law and the prophets. He doesn't undo what they said, he doesn't stand it on its head, and he doesn't say that after I die and after I'm raised again you no longer are obliged to the moral law. So you go right ahead and commit idolatry, go ahead and blaspheme, go ahead and break the Sabbath, go ahead and be insubordinate, go ahead and murder, go ahead and commit adultery, go ahead and commit theft, That's the reductio ad absurdum. That means to reduce an argument to absurdity. If we conclude that what Jesus means in verse 17 is that he gets rid of the Christian obligation to the law, then we have to get rid of a lot of Bible, and we have to get rid of a lot of sense and smarts, because that certainly is not what's happening. The emphasis in this section is on Jesus' relationship to the law, And in a doctrinal sense, he is going to correct misinterpretation in verses 21 to 47. We call these antitheses. Why? Because he says, you have heard that it was said to those of old, but I say to you. So that's an antithesis. You've heard that it was said to those of old, but I say to you. So he's correcting. But he is not correcting Moses. He's not correcting the original intent. He is not correcting in such a way as to suggest that Moses was somehow haphazard in his application of the law. He is dealing with the Pharisees. In fact, if you look at verse 20, I say to you that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. That's his target. It's not Moses. Moses gave the law as he received it from the father, and he published it to Israel. That law always specified that it was both external, you couldn't actually stop a man's heart from beating, but it was also internal. You weren't supposed to hate your neighbor. You weren't supposed to despise him in your heart. You weren't supposed to wish ill upon him. Same with adultery. The law not only spoke to the external act, don't go into your neighbor's wife, but it also spoke to the internal man. You're not supposed to have lust, or a woman. You're not supposed to do that. And the Old Testament is filled with that. So the antitheses show that Christ is interpreting the law, and its original intent is given by God through Moses to Old Covenant Israel. But in that period of time between Moses and Jesus, you had a lot of people that messed up the teaching of the law. not haphazardly the scribes and the Pharisees. They emphasized that as long as you kept the external, it really didn't matter about what was going on in your heart. So he's not elevating the law. He's not making it spiritual. It was already elevated. It was already spiritual. He's simply clearing away that misinterpretation. So the Lord fulfills the law in that regard. Again, listen to Spurgeon. Our king honors his father's law. He took care to revise and reform the laws of men, but the law of God he established and confirmed. Our king has not come to abrogate the law, but to confirm and reassert it. And I would suggest that's what he means there with reference to his doctrine. So in his work, he fulfills it by who he is and what he does. In his doctrine, he fulfills it by confirming and by restating and by clearing away misinterpretation so that people understand the truth of the law as it was always intended, both the outer and the inner man, both the external act, no adultery, but also the internal act, no lust in your heart after her or after him. So that's what's happening here in Matthew 5. And again, we put it in its larger covenantal context. When Jeremiah promises what Jeremiah promises, it's part of, or rather, it points to the new covenant. And if you look back at Matthew chapter 1, You should read verse 1 not only as introductory to the book, but as covenantal in terms of the connection to the rest of Scripture. Notice in Matthew 1.1, the book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, notice the son of David, the son of Abraham. So in just those brief words, what Matthew is showing is that all that God promised to Abraham and to David has come to fulfillment in the one who is God's Son. He is Jesus Christ, he is connected to David, and he is connected to Abraham. In other words, it's a covenantal context. Turn to Matthew chapter 26 and you see the giving of the supper. We read this when we take the Lord's Supper. And he says specifically in verse 28, for this is my blood of the new covenant, that new covenant that Jeremiah prophesied. So for Jeremiah to prophesy what Jeremiah prophesied and for the Lord Jesus to invoke this language when he inaugurates this covenant in his blood, it's very significant and it's very powerful. And what he says in Matthew 5, 17 to 20 indicates that he is not getting rid of the Ten Commandments, but rather he is confirming, he is clearing away the misinterpretation, and he's applying it to those who hear him. So not only his doctrine concerning the law, but turn to Matthew 12 with reference to his specific attention to the Sabbath. His specific attention to the Sabbath. Notice in Matthew 12 at verse 1. At that time, Jesus went through the grain fields on the Sabbath and his disciples were hungry and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. And when the Pharisee saw it, they said to him, look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath. But he said to them, have you not read what David did when he was hungry? He and those who were with him, how he entered the house of God and ate the showbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, not for those who were with him, but only for the priests. nor for those who are with him, but only for the priests? Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless? Yet I say to you that in this place there is one greater than the temple. But if you had known what this means, I desire mercy and not sacrifice, you would have not condemned the guiltless. For the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath." Notice what he says before we continue in verse six. There is one greater than the temple. One greater than the temple. Now, I mentioned dispensationalism earlier, and again, whether you know what that means or not, I'm going to tell you something that they believe. They believe that some of the next big events mean, in terms of what's going to happen in God's providence and according to prophecy, is that there's going to be a rebuilt temple. It's going to be a rebuilt temple, there's going to be a rapture of the Gentile church, and then a Jewish sort of golden age. But at this rebuilt temple, they're going to have animal sacrifice. That is to go exactly backwards in redemptive history. Jesus is greater than the temple. That means that Jesus is the reason why the temple existed. It's not that Jesus steps out of the way and then the temple comes and then sort of this Jewish golden age. That's not it at all. Jesus is the reason, not for the season, but Jesus is the reason for the temple. It was a type, it was a shadow, it prefigured, it pointed forward. The whole idea behind tabernacle and temple is dwelling. That's what John says of Jesus, the word became flesh and did what? He dwelt among us and we beheld his glory. So if the son of God came and dwelt among us, we by God's grace believe in him. We are now in union with Him. All that the temple signified has come to pass. Why would we need a rebuilt temple? Why would we need a revived Roman Empire? Why would we need this sort of Jewish Golden Age? What we have in Christ is fulfillment. He's greater than the temple. But then notice, continuing in verse 9, Now when he had departed from there, he went into their synagogue, and behold, there was a man who had a withered hand. And they asked him, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath, that they might accuse him? Then he said to them, What man is there among you who has one sheep? And if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not lay hold of it, and lift it out? of how much more value then is a man than a sheep. Therefore, it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath. Then he said to the man, stretch out your hand, and he stretched it out, and it was restored as whole as the other. Then the Pharisees went out and plotted against him how they might destroy him." Now, before we look at some specifics with reference to the Sabbath, you probably heard us, either Kam or I, speak of Jesus as a prophet, priest, and king. a prophet, priest, and king. And sometimes people outside of the Reformed world say, well, that was something that was invented by the Reformers and by the Puritans, and they sort of imposed that on Scripture. It's all over Scripture. It's specifically here in Matthew 12. Look at verse 6 again. Yet I say to you that in this place there is one greater than the temple. So if Jesus transcends the temple, and Jesus is the reason why the temple was, then I take that as a reference to not only temple, but priest. Jesus is that high priest that transcends any earthly priest. But then look over at chapter, or continuing in chapter 12, notice in verse 41, the men of Nineveh will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it because they repented at the preaching of Jonah, and indeed a greater than Jonah is here, Christ's a prophet. Verse 42, the queen of the south will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon and indeed a greater than Solomon is here. So in Matthew 12 he says he's the great high priest, in Matthew 12 he says he's the king that's greater than Solomon, and in Matthew 12 he says he's the prophet that's greater than Jonah. And I mean, Jonah had some issues to be sure. Jonah definitely struggled. I'm not sure if we were given who's your top five in terms of prophets, we'd all pick Jonah. But in terms of what Jonah accomplished, being in the belly of a whale and then ending up in Nineveh, great prophet. So prophet, priest, and king motif is all over Matthew chapter 12. It's not an imposition by the Westminster Confession of Faith. It is what scripture teaches concerning our Lord. But in Matthew chapter 12, we notice specifically that he says that the works of necessity are not at odds with the Sabbath. So in Matthew 12, 1 to 8, the Pharisees, the religious leaders, they're upset because Jesus' disciples are picking the heads of grain. Jesus says, no, you're not supposed to be upset by that. These men have to eat or they'll die. These men have to eat. That's a necessity. Works of necessity don't invalidate the Sabbath. The point is, is that he's clearing away not just the bad doctrine of the Pharisees and scribes in Matthew 5, 21 to 47, where they emphasize the external but neglect the internal. Here, he's attacking their practice. Now, for these Pharisees, they thought in terms of Sabbath breaking, and it is bad, but they set up things so that you wouldn't break it. You can walk these many steps, you can do this much, insofar as you don't break the Sabbath. I mean, look at how they even, they phrased the question. When the Pharisees saw it, verse two, they said to him, look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath. Really? Jesus is the law giver. Jesus is the confirmer, Jesus is the interpreter, Jesus is the one who, according to his divinity, spoke this law to creation. And here they want to correct him on what proper practices on the Sabbath? The point is, is that he's taking time to correct their application of bad doctrine that they have built up and to purify the truth of Sabbath keeping. Then notice in verses 9 to 14, he says, the works of mercy are not at odds with the Sabbath. Works of necessity, works of mercy. So for your work of necessity, you've got, you know, certain occupations, yeah, you gotta have a doctor, you gotta have a you know, policemen. You've got to have military. You can't, you know, shut a country down, turn the lights off, and hope your enemies don't attack you. So, you know, the works of necessity. And I think that's what he's pointing to in verse 5. Have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless? Well, they're working. That's their job. That's what they have to do. But are they resting? No, they're actually working. He says that doesn't violate the command. That is built in by God with reference to the observance of the command. So then in verses 9 to 14, he says that works of mercy are not at odds. Notice, again, verse 11. What man is there among you who has one sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not lay hold of it and lift it out? Now, obviously, they'd all say, well, we would, right? I mean, unless they're absolute horrible people, if your sheep falls into a pit, you'd pick it out. And look at his argument of how much more value then is a man than a sheep. Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath. Then he said to the man, stretch out your hand. He stretched it out and it was restored as whole as the other. Then the Pharisees went out and plotted against him how they might destroy him. Interesting, huh? How they might destroy him? He just healed a man with a withered hand, and that's your response? How do we kill this guy? I think you'd say, boy, this fellow's quite handy to have around, no pun intended. He heals withered hands and everything. He's good to have around. But they want to kill him. Why? Because they disagreed with him on the Sabbath, and they didn't like the way that he was interpreting it. The abiding Sabbatarianism is evident in his ministry. And here's the quote I at least referenced last week by a fellow named James Gilfillan. He says, Christ was careful to clear it, the Sabbath, from Jewish corruptions. And if there was any precept more particularly vindicated by him and honored than another, it was that requiring the Sabbath day to be kept holy. Now listen, he says, it is not the practice of a wise man to repair a house which he is about to pull down. I think that's a powerful argument. Why would Jesus debate so frequently with these Pharisees on Sabbatarianism if Sabbatarianism was going to be pulled down? He could have just said, well, wait, I'm gonna die, I'm gonna be raised again, and then you're gonna be in the new covenant era where there's no Sabbath. That would have solved all the issues, that would have solved all the problems, that would have just dispensed with every bit of dispute and debate that they had with him over the Sabbath. No, I think Gilfillan's right. It is not the practice of a wise man to repair a house which he is about to pull down. So when we see Jesus in his earthly ministry upholding the law, And then we see Jesus in His earthly ministry applying the law, and when we see Jesus in His earthly ministry correcting the misinterpretation of that law, both in doctrine, Matthew 5, 21 to 47, and in practice, Matthew 12, in terms of these Sabbath wars, we conclude that He didn't come to abolish, He didn't come to abrogate, but rather He came to fulfill the law. And then if we ask the question, well, which ones of the law? Well, all 10 commandments. Remember, the moral law binds all men in all ages. It's a package deal. In fact, when Paul says, honor your father and your mother, which is the first commandment with promise, First commandment with promise seems to indicate a series of commandments, and I would argue 1 Timothy 1, 8-10, the Apostle Paul there cites the Ten Commandments. He does so in shorthand form, but he does so nonetheless. And so we don't pick and choose which commandments we're going to have. Again, I mentioned dispensationalism last week, and basically they say, unless something is repeated in the New Testament, then it's no longer binding upon us. And of course they find nine of the ten commandments in the New Testament, but they don't find the fourth commandment. That's why outside of the Reformed churches, most evangelicals and all the other types of churches, they're not Sabbatarian. In fact, they might think I'm Judaizing us and placing us under the Old Covenant and placing us under bondage when the Bible doesn't authorize that. Well, we've seen the promise of the prophet Jeremiah in the New Covenant, the law be written on your heart. What law is that? It's the moral law of God. How do we know that? Because Jesus says, don't think that I've come to abolish it. I've rather come to fulfill it. And then we see Jesus and the apostles deal with that moral law over and over and over again, only ever favorably. Now, in context where it's speaking of justification by law, you can get some pretty contrary law statements from the apostle Paul. But remember, it is not for justification. He says in 1 Timothy 1.8, We know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully. So if somebody uses it unlawfully, yeah, he's going to attack it. But he says in Romans 3, do we abolish the law? No, we affirm it. So this idea that somehow law in the New Covenant connected to the Ten Commandments is somehow bad or Judaizing or Old Covenant-ish is simply incorrect. That is a bad way to read scripture. Read the scriptures, see the threefold division of the law, see the three uses of the law, and see how Jesus and the apostles used the law. So in his, the ministry of Christ, we see his doctrine and we see his specific attention to the Sabbath. Then secondly, resurrection. Look at Matthew chapter 28. Matthew chapter 28, we'll bring this to a conclusion here and pick up the teaching of the apostles next week, but look at the emphasis on the resurrection of our Lord. Matthew chapter 28 verse 1, now after the Sabbath, as the first day of the week began to dawn, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb. Well we know what happened, they found an empty tomb. Why? Because Jesus had risen. When did Jesus rise? Now, after the Sabbath, that would have been Saturday, as the first day of the week, that's Sunday, began to dawn, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb. Notice in Mark's Gospel, Mark 16, it's a parallel passage, but when all four authors of the Gospels indicate this, We should probably listen. Mark 16 at verse 1. Now, when the Sabbath was passed, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Salome brought spices that they might come and anoint him. Very early in the morning, on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb when the sun had risen. There's your doctrine of early rising too. You're never supposed to sleep in. The Bible says Jesus rose very early. You need to get out of bed very early. You know I'm kidding, right? That would be a very weird interpretation. That's not the point. Very early in the morning, on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb when the sun had risen. What did they discover? They discovered an empty tomb. Why? Because he has risen. Notice in verse 9, verse 9, now when he rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared at first to Mary Magdalene. Then over in Luke's gospel, Luke chapter 24, Luke chapter 24, again parallel passage, But that same emphasis, Luke 24, one, now on the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they and certain other women with them came to the tomb, bringing the spices which they had prepared. But they found the stone rolled away from the tomb. What did they find? They found that he had risen. He was raised from the dead. And then turn to John's gospel, John chapter 20. John chapter 20. Specifically at verse one, now the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb early while it was still dark and saw that the stone had been taken away from the tomb. Look at verse 19 in John 20. Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut, where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst and said to them, peace be with you. When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. And then again in verse 26, and after eight days. Now, if we count inclusively, this would bring us again to the first day of the week. So, and after the eight days, his disciples were again inside and Thomas with them, Jesus came, the doors being shut and stood in the midst and said, peace to you. Then he said to Thomas, reach your finger here and look at my hands and reach your hand here and put it into my side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing. As our confession says, and I think it's a great summary statement of what the scripture teaches with reference to the Christian Sabbath, or we might call it the Lord's Day. It says, as it is the law of nature that in general a proportion of time, by God's appointment, be set apart for the worship of God, so by his word, in a positive, moral, and perpetual commandment, binding all men in all ages, he hath particularly appointed one day in seven for a Sabbath to be kept holy unto him. which, from the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ, was the last day of the week, or Saturday, and from the resurrection of Christ was changed into the first day of the week, or Sunday, which is called the Lord's Day, and is to be continued to the end of the world as the Christian Sabbath, the observation of the last day of the week being abolished. So that's the argument, and I think it's very cogent, and I think what we find here in chapter 22, paragraph 7 is very biblical and theologically sound. So just by way of a review or reminder with reference to this statement, it says, as it is the law of nature that in general proportion of time by God's appointment be set apart for the worship of God, So basically what that clause is saying is that God in the created order has revealed himself. Paul tells us this in Romans 1. We can look at the effects all around us and argue to the cause. God has made himself known through the created order. So that knowledge of God is in the hearts of all men. Now Paul goes on to say they suppress that truth in unrighteousness, they don't like it, they don't like to retain the thought of God in their heart, but God in general revelation, God in the created order, God to His image bearers, those men created in His image, has revealed that He is. And so nature, light of nature, general revelation, whatever we want to call that, basically tells us that there is a God, and that God should be worshipped, that God should be feared, that God should be revered. Now, left to ourselves, we would botch that up, we would twist it, we would distort it, we would be all kinds of foolish. That's why the confession goes on to say, so by his word, or rather, by God's appointment, be set apart for the worship of God, so by his word. So he reveals to us the specifics. When are we supposed to gather for worship? And it goes on to tell us in a positive moral and perpetual commandment. Now, remember, positive law is something that God institutes for a time, for a specific purpose. For instance, positive law in the Garden of Eden. You're not supposed to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. It's a positive law. It's not like there's certain trees that morally it's just wrong to eat from. The ceremonial law in the Old Covenant was positive law. It was imposed by God for a time on a people for a specific purpose. So positive law includes sacrifice, It includes temple, it includes tabernacle, it includes priesthood, it includes calendar, what days you're supposed to observe. It includes menu, what foods you're supposed to eat. It includes clothing, what, you know, fibers you're not supposed to mix. There's no morality or no ethics or no goodness per se in not eating bacon or not eating shellfish. That was to distinguish the nation of Israel from the Gentile nations around them. Same with, you know, not combining fibers and all of that. And, you know, the various aspects of positive or ceremonial law that you see there. So positive law refers to the day on which we worship God. And positive law, as you might guess, is conditioned by the covenant you find yourself in. So if you're in the old covenant, the positive law stipulates that you meet on Saturday. But then it goes on to say moral. That highlights the reality that no matter what covenant you find yourself in, no matter who you are in the continuum of time, you are duty-bound and obliged to God to give Him a day that is set apart for worship, for praise, and for adoration. So the moral principle is, one day out of seven, you worship God. The positive law is conditioned by the covenant. Old covenant, Saturday. New covenant, Sunday. How do we know that? Because the resurrection of Christ. And God willing, next week we will see specific texts by the apostles that deal with that. And just to give you a bit of a roadmap as to where we're going to go, Hebrews chapter 4, very important for a study in the Christian Sabbath, because Hebrews 4.9 says, therefore, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God. I don't know how much clearer it could be. In fact, I'll quote A.W. Pink on that verse. He says, Here then is a plain, positive, unequivocal declaration by the Spirit of God. There remaineth therefore a Sabbath keeping. Nothing could be simpler, nothing less ambiguous. The striking thing is that this statement occurs in the very epistle whose theme is the superiority of Christianity over Judaism. written to those addressed as holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling. Therefore, it cannot be gainsaid that Hebrews 4 and 9 refers directly to the Christian Sabbath. Hence, we solemnly and emphatically declare that any man who says that there is no Christian Sabbath takes direct issue with the New Testament Scriptures." And as we'll see when we look at that particular passage, The apostle uses the word rest over and over and over and over and over and over and over again in Hebrews 3 and 4. And he uses the same word until verse 9. And that's when he says, there remains therefore a Sabbath rest, literally a Sabbath keeping for the people of God. So it's inescapable. And then I'll argue that 410 legitimizes the day change from Saturday to Sunday. But then after that, we'll look at Acts 20. and the worship service in Troas, the collection in Corinth in 1 Corinthians 16, 1 and 2, and then the Lord's Day, Revelation chapter 1 and verse 10. So if any of those texts intrigue you, and you wonder how they work in Christian Sabbatarianism, then I would encourage you to come back next Wednesday night. So I'll pray, and then if there's any questions on any of the material that we looked at tonight, we can deal with those. Our Father, we thank you for your word. We thank you for its consistency. We thank you for your wonderful law. We know that we're not saved by keeping it, but we are saved by grace through faith in our Savior and the Spirit guides us according to that revealed law. And we thank you for it. We praise you and bless you for so great a salvation through Christ our Lord. We do long to follow him wherever he bids us in a way that is consistent with our calling in the gospel. We ask that you would continue with us, be with us in the remainder of this week, be with all our brothers and sisters in our church, bring us together on the Lord's day that we may worship you in spirit and truth, and we pray through Christ our Lord, amen. All right, any questions on the ministry of Christ?
