Theological term
Two or Three Witnesses
6 sermons · All terms
The Maintenance of Justice (Higher Court and Monarchy)
Deuteronomy 17:8–20 establishes two institutions for the maintenance of justice in Old Covenant Israel: a higher court to adjudicate cases too complex for local tribunals, and a monarchy governed by the law of God. The higher court — composed of priests, Levites, and judges at the central sanctuary — held binding authority over difficult cases involving degrees of guilt, civil disputes, and punishments, with criminal contempt of that court carrying a capital sanction. The king was not an absolute sovereign but a servant under God's law, prohibited from multiplying horses, wives, and wealth as a guard against misplaced trust, and required to read the law of God daily so that fear of the Lord, not pride or military power, would govern his reign.
The Death Penalty
Genesis 9:6 grounds the biblical mandate for capital punishment in the image of God: to shed human blood unlawfully is to assault God himself, and the prescribed penalty reflects the weight of that offense. This sermon works through the Noahic covenant as a common-grace ordinance never abrogated, traces the continuity of capital punishment into the New Testament through Romans 13, and then systematically answers both biblical and pragmatic objections — including the mistranslation of Exodus 20:13, the pacifist reading of Matthew 5:38–42, and the woman caught in adultery in John 8. Believers are called to submit to the whole counsel of God on this issue, even where it cuts against cultural sentiment, because consistency with Scripture requires affirming what God has commanded for the governance of civil society.
2LCF Chapter 26 - Of the Church, Part 12
Church discipline is not an optional appendage to church life but one of the three marks of the true church, alongside pure preaching and right administration of the sacraments. This exposition of 2LCF 26.12 and Matthew 18:15 establishes first that formal church membership is a biblical obligation for all believers — evidenced from Acts, Hebrews, and the Thessalonian epistles — and then that membership entails real liability to the church's censures and government. The sermon focuses on the first step of Matthew 18's disciplinary process: private confrontation, its proper aim (winning a brother), its proper disposition (humility, love, and a willingness to be shown a misunderstanding), and the complementary obligations of the one being rebuked.
The Procedure for Church Discipline, Part 3
Church discipline in Matthew 18:15–17 follows a divinely ordered three-step procedure: private confrontation, the involvement of witnesses, and finally the public action of the gathered church. This sermon works through the second and third steps, examining the Old Testament warrant for the two-or-three-witness requirement (Deuteronomy 19:15) and the nature of the church's decisive judgment to treat the unrepentant as a heathen and tax collector. The goal at every stage remains the recovery of the sinning brother, and excommunication — a corporate act of the whole congregation, not merely the elders — is understood as an expression of love and a means God may use to bring a rebel to repentance. The sermon closes with an evangelistic warning: the church's earthly excommunication is a pale shadow of the final excommunication pronounced by Christ on the last day.
The Duties Toward Elders: Discipline
First Timothy 5:19–21 establishes a precise, legally grounded process for receiving accusations against elders, publicly rebuking those found guilty, and doing so without partiality or personal prejudice. The passage roots its discipline procedure in the Old Testament two-or-three-witnesses requirement (Deuteronomy 17; 19), which Paul applies through the same logic as Matthew 18, protecting both the accused elder from frivolous charges and the congregation from the corruption of unchecked sin in its leadership. The sermon argues that church discipline is not a pastoral option but a solemn obligation, witnessed by God the Father, the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels — as binding on Timothy as the charge to preach the word. The controlling application is that congregations must follow biblical due process faithfully, neither shielding sinning elders behind their gifts nor condemning them on the basis of unverified accusation.
Deuteronomy 17:8-20
Deuteronomy 17:8–20 sets forth two connected institutions for Israel's civil life: a central tribunal empowered to adjudicate cases too difficult for local courts, and a set of governing principles for the monarchy Israel would eventually request. The passage establishes that both judicial authority and royal office are subordinate to the law of God, and that contempt for divinely instituted authority — whether in court or in kingship — carries grave consequence. The same pattern carries into the New Testament, where submission to governing authorities (Romans 13) and church discipline (Matthew 18; 1 Timothy 5) reflect identical principles of evidence, procedure, and obedience. The sermon's driving application is that trust placed in any human institution — monarchy, military, wealth, or political alliance — rather than in the living God is the root of covenant unfaithfulness.