Theological term
Regicide
5 sermons · All terms
2 Kings 17:1-23
The fall of the northern kingdom of Israel to Assyria in 722 BC is not mere political history but theological history: the exile of the ten tribes was the direct judgment of God upon a nation that had spent over two centuries filling up the measure of its guilt through idolatry, covenant-breaking, and the rejection of every prophet sent to call them back. Working through 2 Kings 17:1–23, this study traces the instrument of God's judgment (Shalmaneser and Sargon of Assyria), the reasons for it (Israel's fear of false gods, imitation of the nations, rejection of the prophets, and repudiation of the Mosaic covenant), and its result (removal from God's sight — a loss not merely of land but of divine fellowship). The passage warns that those who follow worthlessness become worthless, while those who worship the living God are conformed to His image — and it calls every hearer to heed the warnings God has given before the same measure of guilt is filled.
1 Kings 15:25–16:7
How does a sovereign God relate to the sinful actions of wicked men? Expounding 1 Kings 15:25–16:7, this study traces the reigns of Nadab and Baasha, kings of the northern kingdom of Israel, demonstrating that God employs even regicide and political treachery to fulfill prophetic word while holding the perpetrators fully culpable for their sin. The structural instability of the north — in stark contrast to the covenantal preservation of Judah — illustrates that God measures rulers not by political or military achievement but by obedience to His revealed law. The doctrine of divine providence that emerges calls believers to neither deny God's sovereignty nor abuse it as license for sin, but to find comfort in the certainty that no evil escapes either God's governance or His just judgment.
2 Samuel 1:1-16
2 Samuel 1:1–16 records an Amalekite's false report to David claiming credit for Saul's death, and David's swift, severe response. This exposition examines the inconsistencies in the Amalekite's account, David's genuine grief over Saul and the house of Israel despite Saul's wickedness, and the theological weight of fearing to touch the Lord's anointed. Three practical lessons emerge: guarding against self-promotion, cultivating a multifaceted response to divine judgment that avoids bitterness, and living under the motivating power of the fear of God.
1 Samuel 31
The death of Saul and his sons in 1 Samuel 31 is not merely a military defeat but the judicial end of a king whose reign was marked by persistent unfaithfulness to Yahweh — a verdict the Chronicler renders explicitly in 1 Chronicles 10:13-14. The chapter is examined under three headings: the death of Saul and his sons (with particular attention to Jonathan's steadfast faithfulness), the response of the Philistines (whose pagan celebration is a direct assault on the glory of God), and the kindness of the men of Jabesh-Gilead (who honor Saul out of remembered gratitude for his deliverance of their city in 1 Samuel 11). The study closes by drawing out the relentless fulfillment of God's word across 1 Samuel and calling hearers to faithful, unrecognised service and a consuming concern for the glory of God.
1 Samuel 24
First Samuel 24 presents David at En-Gedi, poised to kill Saul but refusing to lay a hand on the Lord's anointed. The sermon traces three movements in the chapter — the confrontation in the cave, David's appeal to divine judgment, and Saul's hollow response — drawing out three controlling themes: David's patient submission to God's ordering of providence, the proper place of divine vengeance as something prayed for rather than personally executed, and the typological significance of David's restraint as a foreshadowing of Christ's refusal to take a shortcut to the throne. The congregation is pressed to interpret providence through the plain commands of Scripture rather than through circumstantial inference, and to bring the imprecatory Psalms to bear in prayer as a legitimate means of giving place to God's wrath.