Theological term
Pragmatism
11 sermons · All terms
Genesis 12:10-20
Genesis 12:10–20 records the first major moral failure of Abram after receiving the Abrahamic covenant promises: fearing Pharaoh more than God, he deceives the Egyptians by presenting Sarai as his sister, thereby jeopardizing both the seed promise and his wife's honor. The passage exposes the weakness of the patriarch — the father of the faithful walking by pragmatism rather than faith — while demonstrating that the fulfillment of God's covenant promises rests on divine faithfulness, not human faithfulness. The account also foreshadows the later Exodus narrative, as famine, Egyptian affliction, divine plagues, and departure with wealth prefigure Israel's bondage and deliverance. The take-home message is neither license nor despair, but confidence: God's promises are yea and amen in Christ, irrespective of the feebleness of those to whom they are given.
Free Grace Baptist Church - April 8, 2018 PM
The reception of God's written Word must move the covenant people to thoroughgoing, comprehensive reform—in worship, life, and the observance of the sacraments—regardless of whether such obedience will produce measurable results. Expounding 2 Kings 23, this sermon traces three movements in Josiah's reformation of Judah: a public covenant renewal ceremony, an extensive purge of idolatry from both the southern and northern territories, and the restoration of Passover. The driving lesson is that obedience to God's law is not grounded in pragmatic expectation of blessing but in the simple rightness of what God commands—a faithfulness the speaker calls 'obedience without incentives.'
2 Kings 17:27-41
The closing verses of 2 Kings 17 expose three interrelated failures in Israel's religion: a purely pragmatic desire to use God for personal relief, a syncretic manufacture of worship that blends Yahweh with self-made idols, and a defiant rejection of the exclusive covenant demands God laid upon Israel at Sinai. The passage's ironic declaration that the resettled nations 'feared the Lord' is not a commendation but a literary device the author immediately demolishes — true fear of God is incompatible with idolatry. These ancient patterns are alive in contemporary church culture wherever God is treated as a problem-solver, wherever worship is shaped by consumer preference, and wherever the regulative principle of worship is abandoned for pragmatic or syncretic innovation.
2 Kings 16
Second Kings 16 records the reign of Ahaz, one of the most wicked kings in Judah's history — a man whose idolatry, political pragmatism, and innovations in worship reveal a heart comprehensively far from God. The sermon works through three movements: Ahaz's child sacrifice and high-place worship (vv. 1–4), his submission to Tiglath-Pileser III of Assyria rather than trusting Yahweh's covenant promises (vv. 5–9), and his importation of a Syrian altar and remodeling of the temple (vv. 10–20). The passage serves as a sustained warning against pragmatism over promise, worship innovation over the regulative principle, and the spineless complicity — exemplified by the priest Urijah — that advances evil as surely as outright wickedness does.
The Contest at Carmel
The contest on Mount Carmel in 1 Kings 18 is not merely a dramatic episode from Israel's monarchic period — it is a confrontation between the living God of Israel and the futility of every false god. Elijah's challenge to a compromised people, 'How long will you falter between two opinions?', exposes the recurring temptation to blend true religion with idolatry, whether in ancient Israel's Baalism or in the subtler syncretism of today. The sermon traces the theological case for why Baal attracted Israelite worship — royal sanction, tradition, relevance to felt needs, and sensual appeal — before showing how God's consuming fire rendered that attraction indefensible. The application presses toward total allegiance: no halting between God and money, God and self, God and any competing lord.
2 Samuel 19:9-43
Second Samuel 19:9–43 narrates David's return to Jerusalem after Absalom's failed rebellion, exposing both the political complexity of restoring a dethroned king and the deeper spiritual condition of those who surround him. Three figures — Shimei, Mephibosheth, and Barzillai — are studied as contrasting portraits: pragmatic self-interest, costly loyalty, and contented faithfulness. The passage closes with a petty tribal quarrel between Israel and Judah that foreshadows Sheba's rebellion in chapter 20, illustrating that division in the covenant community is driven by the craving for position and prestige rather than submission to God's king. The application is direct: examine whether your allegiance to Christ is a matter of genuine conviction or merely policy, and cultivate the decreasing posture of John the Baptist.
1 Samuel 4
Israel's defeat at the hands of the Philistines and the capture of the Ark of the Covenant in 1 Samuel 4 expose a fundamental corruption in Israel's religion: the attempt to manipulate God through sacred objects rather than seek him through repentance and faith. The elders ask the right theological question — why has the Lord defeated us? — but then reach for the Ark as a kind of holy talisman, treating Yahweh as a means to military victory rather than as the sovereign end of all worship. The sermon presses the contemporary application that the same impulse toward religious technique and formulaic spirituality pervades much of professing Christianity today, and calls hearers to seek God for who he is rather than for what he gives.
Seduction to Idolatry
Deuteronomy 13 confronts Israel — and the church — with three escalating scenarios of seduction to idolatry: the false prophet who performs genuine signs and wonders, the intimate family member who whispers in private, and the city that has given itself wholly over to apostasy. The sermon argues that the severity of the prescribed penalties is not barbarism but proportionate justice rooted in the holiness, jealousy, and justice of the God who redeemed Israel by sovereign grace — and that the New Testament, far from softening this standard, intensifies it in passages such as Galatians 1:8-9 and 1 Corinthians 16:22. Throughout, the preacher insists that the church today does not wield the civil sword, but must nonetheless take with utmost seriousness the danger of idolatry in all its forms — including the subtlest idol of self — and find refuge from it only in the cross of Christ.
Two Types of Theological Speech, Part 1
Malachi 3:13–15 exposes three forms of harsh theological speech that were as common in fifth-century Judah as they are in the twenty-first-century church: the pragmatic complaint that serving God is useless, the mercenary demand that obedience must yield personal profit, and the protest that God's governance is unfair. The sermon argues that each of these postures treats God as a lucky charm whose sole purpose is human happiness, and so constitutes blasphemy against the sovereign Lord of all. The remedy is not self-reformation but the gospel itself — beholding Christ as the chief treasure, the pearl of great price, in whom the believer finds everything that the complainers were wrongly seeking from God.
The Dangers of Pragmatism
Pragmatism as a worldview — the conviction that 'what works' replaces 'what is true' — poses a constant threat to faithful Christian living and ministry. This sermon expounds Deuteronomy 31–34, tracing Moses' fatal act of pragmatic disobedience at the waters of Meribah (Numbers 20) and its severe but merciful consequence: exclusion from Canaan. Drawing on 1 Corinthians 3, the sermon argues that believers' post-conversion works will be judged by fire, and that Moses' death on Nebo — attended by God himself — is the Old Testament portrait of a servant who suffered loss yet was never abandoned by the covenant Lord. The abiding application is this: obey God's commanded means, not merely his commanded ends, and rest in the assurance that nothing can separate the justified sinner from the love of God in Christ.
The Identity of the Church
What is the church, and what is she for? Expounding 1 Timothy 3:14–16, this sermon sets out the identity and confession of the church under three descriptions Paul gives: the house of God, the church of the living God, and the pillar and ground of the truth. The church's unique institutional privilege — distinct from family and state — is to proclaim, defend, and propagate the gospel of Christ crucified and risen. The sermon closes with a call to resist pragmatism, hold fast to sound doctrine, and enter the house of God through Christ alone.