Theological term
Heterodoxy
4 sermons · All terms
2LCF - Introduction to the 1689 London Confession of Faith
The 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith (properly the 1677 Confession) did not arise in a vacuum: it was a deliberate act of theological stewardship by particular Baptists who stood inside the Reformed Protestant consensus, followed the Westminster Assembly and the Savoy Declaration in structure and wording, and published their confession to correct heterodoxy, serve a new generation, and demonstrate solidarity with fellow persecuted Protestants. This introductory session reads the original epistolary preface to the confession in full and then surveys its argument under five headings — continuity, catholicity, candor, confirmation, and conversation — showing how the confessors understood creeds and confessions as the church's Berean effort to articulate what the Bible says, not to add to it. The session closes with a call to receive the confession in the same spirit in which it was written: not contention, but a whole-souled, humble, and Spirit-dependent owning of the faith once for all delivered to the saints.
The Apostle's Charge to Timothy
Paul's charge to Timothy in 1 Timothy 1:3–7 commands the silencing of false teachers in Ephesus who taught other doctrine, devoted themselves to fables and endless genealogies, and generated disputes rather than godly edification. The charge is not motivated by power or animosity but by love flowing from a pure heart, a good conscience, and sincere faith — the fruit of regeneration. The false teachers compounded their error by combining ignorance of the law with arrogant confidence in their own assertions, a combination the apostle deems disqualifying. Churches today must hold the same line: qualifying teachers rigorously, refusing platforms to the heterodox, and measuring all teaching against the truth as it is in Jesus.
The Indictment of False Teachers
False teachers are identified in 1 Timothy 6:3–5 not only by their departure from apostolic doctrine but by the character it produces: pride, ignorance, an obsessive craving for controversy, and a materialistic motivation that treats religion as a revenue stream. The sermon argues that what a man believes concerning God inevitably shapes how he lives under God, so that heterodoxy and ungodliness are inseparable fruits of the same root. The congregation is called to cultivate discernment through saturation in Scripture and confessional theology, so that the orthodox may recognize and withdraw from ravenous wolves before damage is done to Christ's flock.
The Charge to Timothy
The Apostle Paul's charge to Timothy in 1 Timothy 1:3–7 exposes a crisis of false teaching in the Ephesian church and demands an authoritative, commanding response — not suggestion or diplomacy. The sermon works through the specific charge to silence heterodoxy (vv. 3–4), the purpose of that charge which is love flowing from a pure heart, a good conscience, and sincere faith (v. 5), and the defection of the false teachers who, having strayed from the truth, turned to idle talk and arrogant ignorance (vv. 6–7). The congregation is pressed to see that doctrinal fidelity is the precondition of genuine love in the church, and that the qualifications for teaching office in 1 Timothy 3 exist precisely to prevent the disorder on display in Ephesus.