Theological term
Herem
16 sermons · All terms
The Solicitation to Apostasy
Deuteronomy 13 confronts Israel with three escalating scenarios of solicitation to apostasy: the false prophet, the intimate family member or friend, and the corrupt city given over to idolatry. In each case the text demands not tolerance but purging, because defection from the living and true God constitutes treason against the theocratic covenant order. The chapter's severity is inseparable from its mercy: faithful execution of justice removes the cause of divine wrath and secures the covenant blessings sworn to the fathers. The passage presses the hearer to examine whether fidelity to God holds firm against both miraculous signs that lead astray and the subtler pull of intimate relationships.
The Command for the Conquest
Deuteronomy 7:1–11 sets out the divine policy for Israel's conquest of Canaan, commanding total destruction of the seven Canaanite nations and prohibiting political, social, and religious alliances with them. The passage answers the modern objection that God commanded genocide of innocent peoples by demonstrating from Leviticus 18 that the Canaanites were under divine judgment for extreme wickedness, and that God applied the same standard of judgment to Israel when Israel imitated their conduct. The distinction between Israel and Canaan rests entirely on sovereign, unconditional election — not Israel's numbers or righteousness — and finds its New Covenant fulfillment in the church as the true people of God united to Christ. The passage's prohibitions carry direct application to contemporary alliances: believers are to marry only in the Lord, avoid religious compromise on cardinal doctrines, and understand civil government's proper and limited role.
The Wars of the LORD
Numbers 21 traces Israel's journey through military victory over the Canaanites, the punishment and grace of the bronze serpent, and the conquest of the Amorite kings Sihon and Og. The bronze serpent — condemned people bitten by fiery serpents, healed only by looking in faith to the remedy God prescribed — is taken up by Jesus in John 3:14 as a type of his own crucifixion, teaching that salvation comes by divine initiative alone, received through faith, not works. The same recurring sins of complaint, lack of faith in providence, and idolatry that marked the first generation persist in the second, warning the church that these corruptions follow the sin nature across every generation. The chapter closes with God's sovereign hardening of Sihon and the defeat of the giant Og, both down payments on the promised conquest and demonstrations of God's faithfulness, sovereignty, and goodness to his people.
The Rejection of Saul
Saul's disobedience in 1 Samuel 15 — sparing Agag and the best livestock against the explicit herem command — is not an isolated failure but the culminating point of a progressive apostasy rooted in disregard for the Word of God. The sermon traces the anatomy of that apostasy through Saul's blame-shifting, false piety, self-deception, and counterfeit repentance, setting him in deliberate contrast with David, whose genuine faith expressed itself in confession and flight to the mercy of God. The critical lesson is that great privilege within the covenant community — anointing, early victories, religious activity — does not confirm saving grace, and that obedience to the revealed Word of God, not religiosity, is the mark of the true people of God.
The Astonishment of Paul
Paul's opening salvo in Galatians 1:6–9 is a study in holy alarm: the apostle marvels not with wonder but with grief that the Galatian churches are so quickly defecting from the gospel of grace to a Judaizing corruption that mingles law-keeping with faith. The Judaizing heresy — like Roman Catholicism, the New Perspective on Paul, and the Federal Vision after it — does not abolish Christ but supplements him, which Paul declares is no gospel at all, because justification is either entirely by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, or it is not justification at all. The sermon traces three movements in the passage: Paul's astonishment at the defection, the nature of the false gospel as something that is 'not another,' and the double anathema pronounced on all who pervert the gospel regardless of their authority. The application calls hearers to a 'blessed intolerance' toward gospel corruption, to precision in doctrine, and to the personal embrace of Christ's doing and dying as the sole ground of acceptance with God.
1 Samuel 27
David's flight to Philistia in 1 Samuel 27 presents one of the most theologically ambiguous episodes in his life: the author records neither divine approval nor censure, and God is not mentioned once in the passage. The sermon examines the difficulty of interpreting David's strategy — either a shrewd military calculation or a lapse of faith overruled by providence — while surveying the crushing pressures David faced. Six practical lessons are drawn for believers, centering on the need to speak to oneself theologically, to recall God's proven faithfulness in difficulty, to seek wisdom before acting, and to resist presuming on providence as a license for careless living.
1 Samuel 15:10-23
Saul's partial obedience to God's command to destroy the Amalekites exposes the anatomy of hypocritical religion: self-congratulation in the face of clear disobedience, blame-shifting, and the use of pious pretexts to cover rebellion. Working through 1 Samuel 15:10–23, the study examines how Samuel's confrontation strips away each layer of Saul's self-justification and arrives at the declaration that to obey is better than sacrifice. The text drives home that partial obedience is not obedience, that rebellion against God's word carries the gravity of witchcraft and idolatry, and that the only honest response is open confession and reliance on the perfect obedience of Christ in the sinner's place.
1 Samuel 15:1-9
1 Samuel 15:1–9 presents the divine command to utterly destroy the Amalekites, an act that raises the perennial ethical objection: how can a just God command genocide? This study works through the text to show that the destruction of the Amalekites was not arbitrary cruelty but the measured, delayed judgment of a sovereign God upon persistently wicked people who had already demonstrated their guilt. Saul's failure to execute the command fully is traced not merely to tactical disobedience but to the deeper sin of rejecting the word of the Lord — a sin the preacher identifies as common to all who minimize or rationalize disobedience. The study closes by pointing to Christ as the one who, unlike Saul, always obeyed the Father perfectly, whose active and passive obedience is received by faith alone as the ground of the believer's standing before God.
Judges 21
Judges 21 closes the appendix of the book of Judges (chapters 17–21) with a portrait of a nation morally unmoored: the eleven tribes, grieving the near-extinction of Benjamin, pursue the preservation of that tribe through oath-keeping so selective it becomes its own form of wickedness. The chapter exposes the pattern of sin snowballing from small beginnings into national catastrophe, the inconsistency of piecemeal holiness, and the horror of unrestrained human depravity. Yet God's sovereignty overrules the chaos, preserving the tribe of Benjamin — from which both King Saul and the apostle Paul would come — and the passage closes with the theological verdict of verse 25: without a king, every man does what is right in his own eyes.
Judges 20
Judges 20 records the civil war in which eleven tribes of Israel assembled against Benjamin to avenge the rape and murder of the Levite's concubine at Gibeah. The chapter raises a theologically pressing question: why did God command Israel to battle yet permit two devastating defeats before granting victory in the third engagement? This study expounds three movements in the chapter — the Levite's report, Israel's decision, and the three-stage military action — and draws out lessons concerning the unity of God's people, the wickedness of false solidarity, the proper use of the means of grace, and the mystery of divine providence, which does not guarantee that the path of obedience will be free of suffering.
The Ninth Commandment
The ninth commandment, 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor' (Deuteronomy 5:20), governs far more than courtroom testimony — it encompasses every form of lying, slander, backbiting, gossip, hypocrisy, and doctrinal heresy. Three grounds obligate God's people to truth-telling: God himself is truth, man bears God's image and his reputation is inviolable, and the stability of every social order depends on trust. The positive demand of the commandment calls believers to speak truth in all spheres of life, to discourage slander, and to resist the co-opting of humanist language that obscures biblical categories.
Galatians 1:6-10
Galatians 1:6–10 confronts the Galatian churches' rapid defection from the gospel of grace to a Judaizing heresy that added circumcision and law-keeping to faith as a condition of justification. The sermon argues that any addition of human merit to the work of Christ — however small — destroys the gospel entirely, because salvation is either by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, or it is by the law, and the two cannot be mixed. The Apostle Paul's double pronouncement of anathema on false gospel teachers is examined in its Old Testament background (the herem principle) and applied as a call to doctrinal precision, vigilance against indifference, and refusal to supplement the finished work of Christ.
Deuteronomy 20
Deuteronomy 20 sets forth three categories of principle governing Israel's holy warfare: a general call to fearlessness grounded in the presence and power of Yahweh, specific exemptions from military service, and regulations for engaging enemy cities. The chapter distinguishes between cities far from Canaan — to whom peace must first be offered — and the Canaanite nations under the ban, who were to be utterly destroyed lest they corrupt Israel's worship. Throughout, the text reveals a God who fights for His people, restrains their conduct in war by humanitarian concern, and warns that failure to execute the ban would produce exactly the idolatry Israel later fell into.
Seduction to Idolatry
Deuteronomy 13 confronts Israel — and the church — with three escalating scenarios of seduction to idolatry: the false prophet who performs genuine signs and wonders, the intimate family member who whispers in private, and the city that has given itself wholly over to apostasy. The sermon argues that the severity of the prescribed penalties is not barbarism but proportionate justice rooted in the holiness, jealousy, and justice of the God who redeemed Israel by sovereign grace — and that the New Testament, far from softening this standard, intensifies it in passages such as Galatians 1:8-9 and 1 Corinthians 16:22. Throughout, the preacher insists that the church today does not wield the civil sword, but must nonetheless take with utmost seriousness the danger of idolatry in all its forms — including the subtlest idol of self — and find refuge from it only in the cross of Christ.
Deuteronomy 13
Deuteronomy 13 exposes three escalating threats to covenant fidelity in Israel: the false prophet who performs genuine signs but leads toward idolatry, the family member or close friend who privately solicits apostasy, and the urban revolutionary movement that corrupts an entire city. The chapter shows that God tests his people through such enticements to reveal whether their love for him is genuine, and that the severity of the prescribed penalties is proportionate to the gravity of the crime — which was not merely religious sin but constitutional treason against the covenant Lord. The same principles carry into the new covenant: gospel perverters are anathematized, family loyalty must never outrank loyalty to Christ, and the first and second commandments still demand undivided allegiance.
A Potential Danger Identified
Deuteronomy 7:17–26 identifies a specific temptation that would face Israel on the threshold of Canaan: the temptation to doubt God's faithfulness when confronted by nations greater than themselves. Drawing on the failure of the first generation recorded in Numbers 13–14 and Deuteronomy 1, the exposition works through Moses' five-part antidote to that doubt — a corrective, an exhortation to remember the Exodus, an encouragement from God's provision, a reminder of God's character, and a repeated command to destroy idols utterly. The cross-covenantal application presses believers to resist unbelief by rehearsing what God has already accomplished in Christ, and to cultivate a hatred of sin that guards against the gradual snare of idolatry.