Theological term
Divine Exemplar
2 sermons · All terms
Ask FGBC 70: Is Progressive Covenantalism Compatible with the 1689?
Progressive Covenantalism and New Covenant theology are examined against the standard of the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, with particular attention to whether either system can consistently affirm the covenant of works, the covenant of redemption, and the law/Sabbath chapters of the Confession. The discussion traces the hermeneutical root of these systems — a tendency toward biblicism that resists theological vocabulary not found verbatim in Scripture — and argues that their own best instincts, illustrated by Gary Long's late work on the Adamic covenant and the creation rest, point toward the fuller confessional expression of covenant theology. The conversation closes by considering the covenant of redemption and whether collapsing it into the eternal decree is adequate, finding devotional and doxological value in the anthropomorphic language of the pactum salutis even where precise metaphysics must be qualified.
Genesis 2:1-3
Genesis 2:1–3 establishes the Sabbath not at Sinai but at creation, where God's completion of the cosmic temple, his rest of holy delight, and his blessing and sanctification of the seventh day together constitute a creational ordinance binding on all mankind. The text moves in three movements: the completion of creation (v. 1), the rest of the Creator (v. 2), and the blessing and sanctification of the seventh day for the creature's benefit (v. 3). Christ's declaration in Mark 2:27 — 'the Sabbath was made for man' — is not a new pronouncement but a commentary on Genesis 2, confirming that the day was given to image-bearers as a gift from the beginning. Any theology of the Sabbath that does not begin here in Genesis 2:1–3 is defective, and believers are called to receive the weekly Sabbath as a good gift from God rather than resist or dispense with it.
