Theological term
Decree
7 sermons · All terms
CTF 2026 - Session 3: Is God the Author of Sin?
Two difficult theological questions frame this conference session: Is God the author of sin, and do a believer's sins work together for good? Drawing on 1689 LBCF 3.1, Acts 2:23, Acts 17:28, and Romans 8:28, the session argues that God's comprehensive, eternal decree encompasses all things — including sin — without making God personally culpable for evil, because sin is a privation of good rooted in the creature's deformed nature rather than in God's infinitely good being. The session closes by showing from Romans 8:28, with support from Robert Haldane and Genesis 50:20, that God's overruling providence turns even the believer's own sins toward their ultimate good and his glory — not as license to sin, but as ground for humility, dependence, and hope.
The Meeting Between Balak and Balaam
Numbers 22 introduces the Balaam narrative by establishing why a pagan seer is summoned to curse Israel and what unfolds before he ever arrives at Balak's court. The chapter exposes Balaam as a prophet for hire whose heart is drawn by greed even as he formally complies with Yahweh's directives — a tension the narrator signals subtly but the New Testament resolves with unmistakable condemnation. God's sovereignty over Balaam is dramatized in the donkey episode: the seer who cannot see is outperformed by the beast he threatens to kill, and the angel of the Lord stands as adversary to any who would curse the covenant people. The chapter's governing message is that no king's treasury and no hired soothsayer can neutralize a nation over whom the living God fights.
2LCF Chapter 5 - God's Providence
God's providence, as defined in 2LCF Chapter 5, is not blind fate or impersonal chance but the active upholding, directing, disposing, and governing of all creatures and things by the good Creator, according to his infallible foreknowledge and the free and immutable counsel of his own will. The chapter roots providence in the eternal decree of Chapter 3 and traces its scope across four domains: the whole system in general, fortuitous events, the free actions of men, and even the sinful actions of men — the last illustrated supremely by the crucifixion of Christ in Acts 2:23, where God's absolute sovereignty and man's full culpability are held together without cancelling either. The session works through paragraph 1 of the chapter in detail, drawing on Psalm 73, Isaiah 46, Daniel 4, Acts 17, Proverbs 16 and 21, Ephesians 1 and 2, Philippians 2, and Genesis 50 to show that Scripture, not merely the confession, grounds these claims. Believers are exhorted to interpret every circumstance — including political wickedness and social evil — through the axiomatic principle that God is good, while continuing to pray, preach the gospel, and live according to God's revealed will rather than retreating into fatalism.
A Time for Everything
Ecclesiastes 3:1–15 confronts the tyranny and perplexity of time by showing that God has ordered every season of life — from birth to death, weeping to laughter, war to peace — according to his sovereign decree. The preacher of Ecclesiastes does not resolve the tension between life's absurdities and God's purposes, but holds them in juxtaposition: God has put eternity in the heart of man, yet man cannot find out the work God does from beginning to end. The sermon draws two obligations from this: enjoy the good gifts God gives in time, and fear the God who governs all of time — including the appointed moment of Christ's incarnation, the moment of each sinner's effectual calling, and the appointed day of final judgment.
What is Good for Man?
Ecclesiastes 7:1–14 poses the question raised in 6:12 — who knows what is good for man in this vain, shadow-like life? Working through the 'better than' sayings of the chapter, the sermon argues that what is genuinely good for man is often the very thing he instinctively avoids: sorrow, rebuke, and adversity. These are not ends in themselves but instruments by which God cultivates wisdom, exposes the emptiness of riches, and teaches his people their creaturely dependence, so that their hope is ultimately anchored not in temporal blessing but in the incorruptible inheritance secured by Christ.
2LCF Chapter 22 - Of Religious Worship and the Sabbath Day, Part 2
Prayer as a constituent element of Christian worship is examined through paragraphs three and four of the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith (2LCF 22.3–4). The confession distinguishes natural worship — known by the light of general revelation — from instituted or religious worship regulated by Scripture alone, and locates prayer within both: obligatory for all men by nature, yet acceptable to God only when offered in the name of the Son, by the aid of the Spirit, and according to His revealed will. Seven features of prayer in worship are traced: its constitutional place as a means of grace, its universal obligation, its general tenor of thanksgiving, its Trinitarian form, its attendant posture (understanding, reverence, humility, fervency, faith, love, and perseverance), its linguistic restriction to a known tongue against the Romanist Latin mass, and the lawful scope of its content — including the rejection of prayers for the dead and for those who have sinned the sin unto death.
1 Samuel 15, Part 2
Divine impassibility — the classical Christian doctrine that God does not undergo emotional changes — stands at the center of a textual tension in 1 Samuel 15: verses 11 and 35 record that God 'greatly regrets' making Saul king, while verse 29 declares that the Strength of Israel 'will not lie nor relent, for he is not a man that he should relent.' This study argues that there is no contradiction, paradox, or problem in the text, but that the apparent tension is resolved by understanding anthropopathism (the ascription of human emotions to God in Scripture as accommodated language), the priority of divine-essence texts in interpretation, and the inseparable relationship between impassibility and immutability. The practical stakes are high: to modify impassibility is to unravel divine simplicity, omniscience, independence, and eternity, and ultimately to rob God of his divine nature and religion of its firm foundation and assured comfort.