Theological term
Covenant of Circumcision
9 sermons · All terms
2LCF Chapter 29 - Of Baptism, Part 3 - Paedobaptist Arguments
Believers' baptism rests on the covenant distinction between Israel after the flesh and the spiritual seed of Abraham, and no paedobaptist argument survives the scrutiny of those covenantal boundaries. This third study in the confession's chapter on baptism works through six major paedobaptist arguments — from the Abrahamic covenant, household baptisms, federal holiness, and more — and answers each from Scripture, the 1689 confession, and Nehemiah Cox's seventeenth-century Baptist covenant theology. A question-and-answer period then addresses practical matters: rebaptism after sprinkling or infant immersion, communicating credo-baptist convictions to paedobaptist family and elders, prerequisites for baptism, minimum age, and the necessity of immersion as the sign that answers the thing signified.
Free Grace Baptist Church - April 10, 2019 Bible Study
Genesis 17:15–27 is examined within the framework of the Abrahamic covenant, with particular attention to the declaration concerning Isaac, the obedience of Abraham, and the theological relationship between circumcision and baptism. The study draws a careful distinction between the covenant of circumcision — which governed membership in Old Covenant Israel by a works principle (Genesis 17:14) — and the covenant of grace, arguing with Nehemiah Coxe that the two must not be conflated. Colossians 2:11–12 is then opened to demonstrate that spiritual circumcision (regeneration) is the antitype of physical circumcision, and that baptism is the retrospective outward sign of that inward grace already received through faith — a sign that presupposes faith and therefore cannot legitimately be administered to infants.
Free Grace Baptist Church - April 3, 2019 Bible Study
Genesis 17 presents the formal ratification of the covenant of circumcision with Abraham and his descendants, distinguished carefully from the covenant of grace revealed within it. The sermon traces the progressive enhancement of God's promises — seed, fruitfulness, kings, land, and the covenant formula 'I will be their God' — while insisting that the covenant of circumcision operates simultaneously on physical and spiritual levels without the two being conflated. Drawing on Galatians 3–5 and Nehemiah Cox, the exposition argues that to identify the covenant of circumcision with the covenant of grace is an exegetical misstep that yields infant baptism and mingles the law principle with the grace principle in a way the Apostle Paul expressly forbids.
Stephen's Defense, Part 3
Stephen's defense before the Sanhedrin, as recorded in Acts 7:9–16, turns on the narrative of Joseph: a man chosen by God, sent to his people, and rejected by his own brothers. The sermon traces two movements in Stephen's argument — the patriarchs' envious rejection of Joseph, and God's sovereign providence overruling that evil for the preservation of Israel — and shows how each element constitutes a deliberate typological indictment of the council that condemned Jesus. The controlling hermeneutical claim is that Christ is the proper key to the Old Testament, and that the ceremonial law and the temple were always types pointing forward to him, not ends in themselves.
Stephen's Defense, Part 2
Stephen's defense before the Sanhedrin in Acts 7:2–8 turns on a redemptive-historical reading of Abraham that dismantles the charges of blasphemy against the law and the temple. The sermon traces three movements: the call of Abraham (vv. 1–4), the promise of land and descendants made to a childless man (vv. 5–7), and the covenant of circumcision (v. 8). Central to the exposition is the argument that God appeared to Abraham outside the land and apart from any temple, that both circumcision and temple find their terminus in Christ, and that Abraham's justification was by faith alone — his obedience being the fruit, never the ground, of that faith. Listeners are urged to trust not in any outward religious token but in the God of Abraham who sent his Son to fulfill every covenantal obligation his people could not meet.
Stephen's Defense, Part 1
Acts 7:1–2 opens Stephen's defense before the Sanhedrin — the longest speech in the book of Acts — and this sermon surveys the whole of that defense before turning to its parts in subsequent weeks. Stephen answers two formal charges: that he has blasphemed Moses and the law, and that he has blasphemed the temple. His argument from Israel's own history demonstrates that the Sanhedrin, not Stephen, has missed the trajectory of redemptive history, because the law points to Christ and the temple was always a signpost, not a final resting place. The sermon closes by calling hearers who are convicted of sin to run to Christ rather than to gnash their teeth at those who declare the truth.
Liberty and Law
Galatians 5:1–15 presents the Pauline application of justification by faith alone: those whom Christ has liberated from the law's curse must stand fast in that freedom rather than entangle themselves again in the yoke of legal works-righteousness. The sermon works through two headings — the liberty of Christ (vv. 1–6) and the law of love (vv. 7–15) — showing that true Christian liberty is neither license for sin nor grounds for adding human merit to Christ's finished work. Justified believers are called to a gospel holiness expressed through love of God and neighbor, lived out by the Spirit in dependence on Christ's imputed righteousness alone.
2LCF Chapter 29 - Of Baptism
The 1689 London Baptist Confession chapter 29 on baptism is expounded under two headings: the lawful recipients of the ordinance and its proper mode. The confession's definition of baptism as a sign of union with Christ in his death and resurrection is shown to require that only those who have actually professed repentance and faith are its proper subjects — a conclusion argued from covenant theology, positive law, and the consistent narrative of the New Testament. The proper mode is established as full immersion in water in the name of the triune God, grounded in the example of Christ at the Jordan, the Greek term baptizo, and the burial-and-resurrection imagery of Romans 6.
The Example of Abraham
Galatians 3:6–9 presents Abraham as Paul's decisive scriptural witness against the Judaizing demand for circumcision alongside faith. Drawing from Genesis 15:6, Paul demonstrates that Abraham's justification was by faith alone — faith as the instrument, not the ground, by which righteousness was reckoned to his account — and that this same faith-righteousness is the only basis on which anyone, Jew or Gentile, stands as a son of Abraham. The sermon works through four theological implications: imputed righteousness comes through faith alone, sonship to Abraham belongs only to the believing, Scripture itself preached the gospel to Abraham in advance, and the blessing of God falls exclusively on those who share Abraham's faith. Hearers are called to rest in the peace, gratitude, and humility that flow from justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, and to guard against every system — ancient or modern — that supplements faith with human merit.