Theological term
Asceticism
14 sermons · All terms
The Lawful Use of Vows in Israel
Leviticus 27 addresses the Israelite practice of making vows to God — acts of religious zeal, often rash or imprudent, by which persons consecrated people, animals, houses, or land to the Lord. The chapter does not license vow-breaking but rather underscores the gravity of vowing by legislating a costly redemption mechanism, warning the would-be vower to count the cost before speaking. The sermon situates the passage within the 1689 LBCF chapter 23 framework distinguishing oaths from vows, then draws three applications against popish monastical vows, Protestant legalistic vows, and pietistic circumventions of God's law — all forms of man-made religion condemned repeatedly in Scripture.
2LCF Chapter 23 - Of Lawful Oaths and Vows
Second London Confession of Faith chapter 23 treats the doctrine of lawful oaths and vows, distinguishing Reformed Baptist practice from the Anabaptist rejection of oath-taking and from Roman Catholic monastical vows. The sermon argues that swearing by God's name is itself an act of religious worship — acknowledging his omniscience, omnipresence, and vindictive justice — and that Scripture warrants oaths in matters of weight and moment while condemning their careless everyday use. Matthew 5:33–37 is shown to address the abuse of casual, trivial oath-making rather than solemn oaths before lawful authority, as confirmed by Christ's own oath before the Sanhedrin, God's oath to Abraham, and Paul's repeated appeals to God as witness. The sermon closes by exposing popish monastical vows of celibacy, poverty, and obedience as superstitious devices of men that contradict Scripture's positive assessment of marriage, honest labor, and just remuneration.
The Refutation of Heretics
Titus 1:10–16 identifies the threat posed by false teachers within the churches of Crete, describes their character and conduct, and prescribes the elder's task of refuting them. The passage exposes these men as insubordinate, deceptive, motivated by greed, and — paradoxically — more deeply defiled by their very attempts at self-imposed purity. Purity belongs not to those who abstain from foods under defunct old-covenant categories, but to those cleansed by the blood of Christ; any effort to supplement Christ's merit by legal observance strips away that merit entirely. The sermon closes with a call to robust ecclesiology: biblically qualified elders are the God-ordained safeguard against heresy, and the gospel that went to Crete proves that Christ is a real Savior for real sinners.
The Fourth Commandment, Part 3
Romans 14, Galatians 4, and Colossians 2 are frequently cited as evidence that no special day of worship remains for the people of God, but a careful exegesis of each passage shows they address Jewish ceremonial observances and food laws — not the moral, Decalogical Sabbath. The argument of Romans 14 concerns Christian liberty in matters of diet and ethnic calendar practices, not the abrogation of the Lord's Day; Galatians 4 condemns the Judaizing of salvation by attaching religious merit to ceremonial observances; and Colossians 2:16-17 targets the 'sabbaths' that functioned as shadows alongside new moons and festivals — a grouping the Old Testament itself consistently distinguishes from the weekly Sabbath. The Christian Sabbath, grounded in creation, codified at Sinai, prophesied for the new covenant era, and transposed by Christ's resurrection to the first day of the week, remains binding on the people of God — kept not as a means of justification but as a fruit of it.
2LCF Chapter 23 - Of Lawful Oaths and Vows
Lawful oaths and vows, treated in 1689 London Baptist Confession chapter 23, are grounded in the third and ninth commandments and constitute genuine acts of religious worship — invoking God's omniscience, omnipresence, and vindictive justice as witness and judge. The confession distinguishes oaths (promises made to men before God) from vows (promises directed to God himself), insisting both require solemn care and plain sincerity without equivocation or mental reservation. Against Anabaptist denial and Roman Catholic abuse, the sermon defends the legitimacy of lawful oaths in matters of weight and moment, refutes the reading of Matthew 5 as a suspension of oath-taking, and condemns popish monastical vows — perpetual celibacy, professed poverty, and regular obedience — as superstitious snares without scriptural warrant. Hearers are called to prize truth-telling as a reflection of the character of God and to take every solemn oath with a full awareness of its theological gravity.
1 Kings 10: Solomon's Glory and the Greater Than Solomon
1 Kings 10 presents the glory of Solomon's reign through the Queen of Sheba's visit and the narrator's account of surpassing wealth and wisdom, yet it casts the shadow of Deuteronomy 17's prohibitions for kings over the entire scene. The chapter functions as a hinge: Solomon's prosperity is a genuine answer to his prayer in 1 Kings 3 and a display of God's faithfulness, but the accumulation of gold, horses, and chariots foreshadows the apostasy detailed in chapter 11. Typologically, the pagan queen's pilgrimage and the conferral of gifts upon Israel's king anticipate the nations streaming to Christ, whom Matthew 12 identifies as greater than Solomon. The sermon calls hearers to receive God's material gifts with gratitude and joy rather than guilt, and to marvel that the one greater than Solomon stands among us without pomp or gold.
The Visit, the Cloak, and the Books
Paul's final personal requests to Timothy in 2 Timothy 4:9–13 — the urgent summons to visit, the cloak left at Troas, and the books and parchments — reveal the interior life of an apostle facing death in a Roman prison. Three lessons emerge: the indispensable value of Christian fellowship, the forgiving and forward-looking spirit that reconciled Paul to John Mark, and the bookish, industrious mind that turned a prison cell into a command post for gospel strategy. The passage calls God's people to crave Christian communion, to refuse grudge-bearing, and to read widely for the service of Christ.
2LCF Chapter 23 - Of Lawful Oaths and Vows
What makes an oath lawful, and what does the Bible say about vows? Working through Chapter 23 of the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, this study distinguishes between oaths (solemn promises made before God to men) and vows (solemn promises made directly to God), and defends the lawfulness of both against the Anabaptist refusal to swear. The Confession's four characteristics of lawful oaths — their nature as acts of worship, their sanctity as sworn in God's name alone, their solemnity requiring due consideration of weightiness, and their sincerity requiring plain speech without equivocation — are traced through Scripture and illustrated with examples ranging from courtroom testimony to marriage vows. The study closes by warning against rashly multiplying vows and condemning the Roman Catholic tradition of monastic vows as superstitious snares that mistake asceticism for holiness.
The Solid Foundation of God
The apostle Paul's charge to Timothy in 2 Timothy 2:16–19 to shun profane and idle babblings confronts the church with two realities: the devastating spread of doctrinal heresy and the unshakeable solidity of God's foundation. Paul names Hymenaeus and Philetus as concrete examples of men who, by denying the future bodily resurrection, not only increase in ungodliness themselves but overthrow the faith of others — a danger compared to gangrene consuming a body. Against this alarm, verse 19 supplies a double seal of comfort: the doctrine of election (the Lord knows those who are His) and the doctrine of sanctification (those who name Christ depart from iniquity), grounding the confidence that no heretical assault can ultimately destroy what God has established. The sermon applies these truths by calling the church both to vigilant doctrinal discipline and to fearless trust in God's sovereign preservation of His people.
The Duties Toward Elders: Ordination
Careful, unhurried ordination is not a bureaucratic nicety but a biblical obligation: 1 Timothy 5:22–25 commands the church to refuse hasty laying on of hands, because careless ordination makes the ordaining elders accessories to whatever sins an unvetted man brings into the office. The sermon works through four considerations under the prohibition against hastiness — the connection with prior discipline, the nature of the laying on of hands, the danger of implicating oneself in another's sin, and a parenthetic qualification on Timothy's abstinence from wine — before turning to God's providential coordination with the church's diligent use of means in vetting elders. The governing application is that the church must be ruled by the qualifications of 1 Timothy 3:1–7, not by felt need, public opinion, or subjective impulse, trusting that patient obedience to the prescribed process allows God's providence to make evident both the sins and the good works of men being considered for office.
The Joy of the Messianic Kingdom
Why did Jesus' disciples feast while John's disciples and the Pharisees fasted? In Matthew 9:14–17, Jesus answers with the image of the bridegroom: mourning is incompatible with the presence of the long-promised Messiah. Drawing on OT prophecy (Isaiah 54, 62; Hosea 2; Zechariah 8), the sermon argues that the joy of Christ's disciples is not carelessness but the only fitting response to the dawn of the messianic kingdom. The two parables of unshrunk cloth and new wineskins reinforce the same point: fasting and mourning in the presence of the bridegroom is as incongruous as patching old cloth with new fabric, and the disciple of Christ is called to a joy that is consistent, deep, and grounded in forgiveness and imputed righteousness.
The Description of the Heresy
Colossians 2:16–23 exposes a syncretistic heresy threatening the church at Colossae — a blend of Jewish legalism, pagan mysticism, and bodily asceticism — and Paul's response is to anchor the believer's complete standing in Christ alone. The sermon works through three facets of this false teaching: the imposition of dietary laws and calendar observances as religious requirements, the pursuit of angelic visions and experiential 'higher planes' above Scripture, and the self-imposed bodily regulations that, despite their appearance of wisdom, fuel rather than subdue the flesh. The governing principle throughout is that Christ plus anything — legalism, mysticism, or asceticism — is heresy; Christ plus nothing is the gospel.
The Best Defense
Colossians 2:8–10 issues a double-edged call: beware of the spiritual kidnapping of godless philosophy, and rest in the sufficiency of Christ in whom all the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily. The sermon exposes the 'Christ plus' logic underlying ancient and modern heresy — circumcision, asceticism, angel-veneration, and their contemporary equivalents — as substitutes for what believers already possess completely in Christ. The best defense against false teaching is not vigilance alone but a thoroughly biblical Christology, grounded in the conviction that those who are in Christ are complete in the head of all principality and power.
Paul's Conflict and Concern for the Colossians
Colossians 2:1–5 exposes both the nature of Paul's apostolic struggle and the objectives that drove it: he agonized in prayer for churches he had never visited because the stakes of false teaching are eternal. The sermon traces four objectives of Paul's conflict — that believers be encouraged in heart, united in love, assured in understanding, and consumed with Christ as the sole treasury of wisdom and knowledge — before turning to Paul's concern in verses 4–5, where persuasive words are shown to be the perennial weapon of heresy. The antidote is not rhetorical sophistication but deep, corporate rootedness in the person and sufficiency of Christ, which alone guards the church against the humanistic philosophy, legalism, mysticism, asceticism, and antinomianism Paul will address throughout the epistle.