Theological term
Accommodation
13 sermons · All terms
CTF 2025 - Session 4 – The Depth of God’s Eternal and Incomprehensible Nature
What does it mean for God to be eternal, and can finite creatures truly know an incomprehensible God? This conference session works through the classical doctrine of divine eternity — arguing from divine simplicity, immutability, and infinity that God's eternity is not endless temporal succession but the timeless, simultaneous, and perfect possession of boundless life — before turning to divine incomprehensibility, which is not a confession of ignorance but the recognition that the knowledge God has revealed of himself in nature and Scripture far surpasses the creature's capacity to measure or contain it. The session draws on Boethius, Augustine, Turretin, Charnock, Owen, and Bavinck to show that the two doctrines are inseparable, and closes with Solomon's prayer in 1 Kings 8 as a doxological meditation: if heaven itself cannot contain God, no created mind can comprehend him, and that inexhaustibility is the very ground of endless worship.
The Martyrdom of Stephen
Acts 7:54–8:1 records the martyrdom of Stephen, the first Christian martyr, whose death exposes the murderous hatred that unbelieving Israel bore toward the Messiah and those who bore witness to Him. Standing alone before the Sanhedrin, Stephen receives a vision of the glory of God and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of the Father — confirming his theology of temple, rebuking his executioners, and manifesting the presence of the triune God with His servant in extremity. His dying words, mirroring Christ's own prayers from the cross, demonstrate that true temple worship — the meeting of God and sinners in prayer and forgiveness — is found not in any physical structure but in the Lord Jesus Christ. The passage calls believers to theological preparedness, courageous witness, and dependence on the triune God in the face of opposition, however severe.
2LCF Chapter 2 - Of God and of the Holy Trinity, Part 2
What does it mean that God is one, infinite, simple, invisible, incorporeal, and without passions? This Sunday school session works through paragraph 1 of 2LCF Chapter 2, tracing the classical attributes — or perfections — of God through their biblical foundations and the theological vocabulary refined by the church across centuries. Divine simplicity, aseity, incomprehensibility, and impassibility are each examined with care, showing how these doctrines are not abstract curiosities but guard the God of Scripture from distortion and secure the stability of his love, justice, and grace toward his people. The session closes by connecting the doctrine of divine impassibility to the assurance of salvation: because God does not move from one state to another, his love for his people is always most.
The Renewal of God's Covenant, Part 1
Exodus 34:1–9 records the renewal of the Mosaic covenant following Israel's catastrophic idolatry with the golden calf, and the chapter's theological heart is God's self-proclamation of His own glory to Moses on Sinai. The sermon works through three movements in verses 1–9: the command to cut new tablets as a covenant-renewal symbol, the descent of God in the cloud, and God's proclamation of His own name — a compendium of divine perfections stretching from mercy and grace through long-suffering, goodness, truth, and covenant faithfulness to justice and righteousness. These attributes are traced across the canon from the Psalms and the prophets to their fulfillment in the high-priestly work of Christ, who makes definite propitiation for the sins of His people. Moses' response — immediate worship followed by intercessory prayer grounded in the very perfections God had just declared — is held out as the model for the believer's own approach to God.
The Idolatry of Israel, Part 1
Exodus 32:1–14 records the catastrophic breach of Israel's covenant oath, sworn only weeks earlier in Exodus 24, as the people demand a visible god and Aaron fashions the golden calf. The passage exposes the persistent human tendency toward idolatry — rooted in total depravity and inflamed by impatience, carnality, and the craving for a manageable deity — and demonstrates that their sin was not a denial of Yahweh but a second-commandment violation: representing the true God by a forbidden image. The sermon then turns to Moses' masterful intercession, grounded in appeals to God's power, his glory before the nations, and his covenant oath to the patriarchs, and concludes with extended treatment of divine immutability and anthropopathism to explain why Exodus 32:14 ('the Lord relented') cannot be made to teach flux or change in God.
The Promise of God's Provision
Genesis 22:1–19 presents the binding of Isaac as far more than a biographical account of Abraham's obedience — it is a typological promise of God's provision of the Messiah. The sermon works through the test presented to Abraham, his obedience in the three-day journey to Moriah, and God's approval through the substitutionary ram, showing how Abraham, Isaac, and the ram each function as types of the Father, the Son, and the Lamb of God respectively. Abraham's declaration in verse 8 — 'God will provide for himself the lamb for a burnt offering' — is read as genuine messianic anticipation, confirmed by Christ's own words in John 8:56. The passage calls believers to the kind of covenant-anchored faith that perseveres under affliction, catechizes their children in the great truths of God, and rests on the substitutionary atonement accomplished at Calvary.
The Consubstantiality of the Son, Part 1
John 5:16–23 records the Jewish charge that Jesus made himself equal with God — and Christ's unequivocal affirmation of that charge. Working through verses 16–23, this sermon demonstrates that Jesus responds not by correcting a misunderstanding but by confirming, through four lines of argument, that he is consubstantial with the Father: sharing the same works, the same love, the same life-giving power, and the same sovereign rule. The stakes are ultimate — to dishonor the Son is to dishonor the Father, and to lack the Son is to lack God entirely.
2nd London Baptist Confession of Faith (1689) - Sunday School Study - August 29, 2021
What does it mean that God is 'without body, parts, or passions'? This study works through Chapter 2, Paragraph 1 of the Second London Baptist Confession of 1689, examining the perfections of God under three classical categories: divine incorporeality (God has no body), divine simplicity (God is not composed of parts), and divine impassability (God does not undergo emotional change). By grounding each doctrine in Scripture and the church's historic theological grammar — including the distinction between proper and improper predication, accommodation, and anthropomorphism — the exposition argues that God's transcendence over every creaturely category is not a cold abstraction but the very foundation of confident worship and unshakeable assurance for his people.
The Rejection of Saul by the Lord, Part 2
The rejection of Saul in 1 Samuel 15:24–35 exposes the anatomy of false repentance, the character of a reprobate, and the nature of a God who does not change. The sermon works through Saul's admission of guilt, Samuel's execution of Agag, and the theological tension between God's expressed regret and his immutability, resolving that tension through the doctrines of divine impassibility and anthropopathism. The justice of God in dispatching the wicked is shown to be a cause for righteous rejoicing, not moral discomfort, as texts from Judges 4–5 and Proverbs 11 confirm. Saul's downward trajectory — blame-shifting, false piety, delusion, fake repentance, and apostasy — is held up as a warning that great privilege does not equal saving grace, while Christ's imputed righteousness is offered as the only ground of true standing before God.
The Second Commandment, Part 2
The second commandment not only prohibits making and worshiping idols but supplies three reasons for that prohibition: the character of God as covenant Lord, the threat of transgenerational punishment for persistent idolatry, and the promise of mercy to thousands. This sermon works through Deuteronomy 5:8–10 to argue that God's 'jealousy' is an improper predication — an accommodation to human language that conveys his righteousness and justice without implying divine passibility — and that false worship, far from being a neutral innovation, constitutes an act of hatred toward God. The exposition draws on Deuteronomy 24, Ezekiel 18, Leviticus 10, and 1 Samuel 13 to demonstrate that the punishment threatened in the commandment is not a transgenerational curse but the judicial consequence of children imitating their parents' idolatry. Hearers are called to regulate corporate worship strictly by divine prescription, to teach their children true religion, and to approach God solely through faith in Jesus Christ.
The Rejection of the True Prophet of God
When Ahab of Israel gathered four hundred prophets to sanction his campaign at Ramoth-Gilead, he had already resolved what he wanted to hear — and hated the one man who would tell him the truth. This exposition of 1 Kings 22:1–28 traces the confrontation between King Ahab and the prophet Micaiah, examining how the rejection of the true prophet is ultimately the rejection of the Word of God itself. Drawing on the parallel Paul draws in 2 Timothy 4:1–4, the sermon calls hearers to guard their hearts against the perennial temptation to accumulate teachers who scratch itching ears, and to receive the whole counsel of God — rebuke and exhortation included — as the mercy of a wise and sovereign Father.
Genesis 1:26-31
Genesis 1:26–31 presents the creation of man as the deliberate, dignified pinnacle of God's creative work. The plural 'let us make' in verse 26 is examined through three interpretive options — heavenly council, plural of majesty, and the Trinity — with the Trinitarian reading affirmed as the only exegetically and theologically coherent position. The sermon exposits the Imago Dei with reference to Ecclesiastes 7:29, Ephesians 4:23–24, Colossians 3:10, and the 1689 LBCF chapter 4, establishing that the image encompasses rationality, knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness. Hearers are pressed to live as genuine image-bearers — treating fellow humans with dignity, resisting evolutionary reductionism, and exercising responsible dominion over creation for the glory of the triune God.
1 Samuel 15, Part 2
Divine impassibility — the classical Christian doctrine that God does not undergo emotional changes — stands at the center of a textual tension in 1 Samuel 15: verses 11 and 35 record that God 'greatly regrets' making Saul king, while verse 29 declares that the Strength of Israel 'will not lie nor relent, for he is not a man that he should relent.' This study argues that there is no contradiction, paradox, or problem in the text, but that the apparent tension is resolved by understanding anthropopathism (the ascription of human emotions to God in Scripture as accommodated language), the priority of divine-essence texts in interpretation, and the inseparable relationship between impassibility and immutability. The practical stakes are high: to modify impassibility is to unravel divine simplicity, omniscience, independence, and eternity, and ultimately to rob God of his divine nature and religion of its firm foundation and assured comfort.