← Back to sermon library
Malachi. Malachi is the last
book in the Old Testament. I want to read beginning in chapter
1 at verse 6 to chapter 2 verse 9, but our focus this morning
will be on chapter 1 verses 6 to 14. Malachi, the prophet, he was
a post-exilic prophet. So after the Babylonian captivity,
when the people of Judah were allowed to return back to their
land under the decree of Cyrus, the king of Persia. Persia, the
empire in power at the time that Malachi writes. But Malachi wrote
a bit later than Haggai and Zechariah, which were also post-exilic prophets. Malachi prophesied probably around
433 to 425 BC. So I want to read beginning in
Malachi 1 at verse 6. Yet you say, in what way have
we despised your name? You offer defiled food on my
altar, but say, in what way have we defiled you? By saying, the
table of the Lord is contemptible. And when you offer the blind
as a sacrifice, is it not evil? And when you offer the lame and
sick, is it not evil? Offer it then to your governor.
Would he be pleased with you? Would he accept you favorably?
Says the Lord of hosts. But now entreat God's favor,
that he may be gracious to us. While this is being done by your
hands, will he accept you favorably? Says the Lord of hosts. who is
there even among you who would shut the doors so that you would
not kindle fire on my altar in vain. I have no pleasure in you,
says the Lord of hosts, nor will I accept an offering from your
hands. For from the rising of the sun, even to its going down,
my name shall be great among the Gentiles. In every place,
incense shall be offered to my name and a pure offering. For
my name shall be great among the nations, says the Lord of
hosts. But you profane it, and that
you say, the table of the Lord is defiled, and its fruit, its
food is contemptible. You also say, oh, what a weariness,
and you sneer at it, says the Lord of hosts. And you bring
the stolen, the lame, and the sick, thus you bring an offering.
Should I accept this from your hand, says the Lord? But curse
it be the deceiver, who has in his flock a male, and takes a
vow, but sacrifices to the Lord what is blemished. For I am a
great king, says the Lord of hosts, and my name is to be feared
among the nations. And now, O priest, this commandment
is for you. If you will not hear, and if
you will not take it to heart, to give glory to my name, says
the Lord of hosts, I will send a curse upon you, and I will
curse your blessings. Yes, I have cursed them already,
because you do not take it to heart. Behold, I will rebuke
your descendants and spread refuse on your faces, the refuse of
your solemn feasts, and one will take you away with it. Then you
shall know that I have sent this commandment to you, that my covenant
with Levi may continue, says the Lord of hosts. My covenant
was with him, one of life and peace, and I gave them to him
that he might fear me. So he feared me and was reverent
before my name. The law of truth was in his mouth
and injustice was not found on his lips. He walked with me in
peace and equity and turned many away from iniquity. For the lips
of a priest should keep knowledge, and people should seek the law
from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts.
But you have departed from the way. You have caused many to
stumble at the law. You have corrupted the covenant
of Levi, says the Lord of hosts. Therefore, I also have made you
contemptible and base before all the people, because you have
not kept my ways, but have shown partiality in the law. Amen. Well, let us pray. Father, thank
you for the written Word of the living and true God, and we pray
now for the ministry of the Holy Spirit to help us as we consider
this passage of Scripture, help us to see its relevance to the
church today, help us to see its relevance in our local church,
and may it indeed cause us to reflect and cause us to contemplate
and cause us to consider our place before a holy God. Again,
we pray that You would forgive us for all of our sins and our
transgressions, that You would help us to learn the lesson here
of this condemnation of heartless worship. May we not enter into
this sacred place with hearts that are divided or distracted
or longing for things that are not of God. Help us in this,
we pray, by the power of Your Holy Spirit, and we pray through
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. Well, in recent sermons,
I know that I have referred to this particular passage. I've
certainly preached on this passage before. I think it is a most
relevant passage to the church in the 21st century. Essentially,
what we have is a condemnation of heartless worship. Now, Malachi,
the prophet, prophesied, as I said, around 433 to about 425. This
is almost a hundred years after the second temple had been finished. Remember, under Haggai and Zechariah,
they preached and the people built the temple. They started
in 520 BC and they completed it in 516 BC. So, not even a
hundred years later, Malachi is dealing with the same sorts
of problems that preceded the Babylonian captivity. In other
words, bad habits are hard to let go of. And that is simply,
or obviously, the case with reference to Malachi's contemporaries.
Now, in chapter 1, at verse 6, all the way to chapter 2, verse
9, it's a specific condemnation of the priests. He identifies
that in verses 6 and 7. And he follows all the way through
to chapter 2, verse 9. He cites the example of Levi
as being a faithful and a good priest to him, but the people
at Malachi's time had degenerated and they had engaged in wickedness.
We could follow all the way up to chapter 2, verse 9, but I
want to focus on the whole idea of a heartless worship in chapter
1, verses 6 to 14. Now, there is a particular pattern
employed by the prophet Malachi. Essentially, what you have is
accusation by God Then you have question by the people, and then
you have refutation by God. In other words, the Lord, through
the prophet, accuses them or indicts them of something in
particular. And then they essentially say,
who, us? Us? We did this? And then God
produces the evidence to show where they have fallen short. For example, notice here in chapter
1, verse 6, the very end, yet you say, in what way have we
despised your name? Verse 7, in what way have we
defiled you? Notice as well in chapter 1 at
verse 2, I have loved you, says the Lord, yet you say, in what
way have you loved us? They're constantly questioning
God. Notice in chapter 2 at verse
17, you have wearied the Lord with your words, yet you say,
in what way have we wearied Him? Brethren, we're not supposed
to question God when He accuses us or indicts us. We're supposed
to repent. We're not supposed to get into
some dialogue or debate with Almighty God and say, what do
you mean when you bring this indictment to us? We need to
receive the Word of God. We need to be approved and rebuked
by it. And we, by grace, are to be corrected. Notice in chapter
3, verse 6. For I am the Lord, I do not change,
therefore you are not consumed, O sons of Jacob. Yet from the
days of your fathers you have gone away from my ordinances
and have not kept them. Return to me and I will return
to you, says the Lord of Hosts. But you said, in what way shall
we return? You see that pattern. God accuses
or indicts them, and then they question God, and then God furnishes
evidences as to how they have not returned, how they have not
done what He calls them to do. Notice with reference to tithing
in chapter 3, verse 8. Will a man rob God? Yet you have
robbed me. But you say, in what way have
we robbed you? Brethren, it's really incredulous
that they would respond in this manner. And I think it's incredulous
that we respond in this manner. We get convicted by the Word
of God. The answer is not, Oh, no, that's not me. Or how did
I offend you, God? We are to take that reproof and
bless God for it. And by grace, repent. That's
the response of the godly man, of the godly woman, of the godly
boy and godly girl. Notice in chapter 3 verse 13,
your words have been harsh against me, says the Lord, yet you say,
what have we spoken against you? You see the pattern involved
in the prophet Malachi. Accusation by God, response by
the people, and then the Lord furnishes evidences or proofs
as to how they've fallen short. So let's look at this whole condemnation
of heartless worship. First, the accusation by God.
Secondly, we'll notice the response of the people. And then thirdly,
we'll draw out some implications concerning unacceptable or heartless
worship. But note first this lack of honor. Verse 6, God says, a son honors
his father and a servant his master. Notice how that's an
axiom. That's a first principle. That's
the way life is supposed to be. It is the case, kids, that you
honor your father. It is the case, servants, that
you honor your master. And God uses that axiom, God
uses that first principle as an analogy to say, if that's
the case in the created order, then why don't my sons honor
me? Why don't my servants honor me? That's the point of verse 6.
The Lord has, and I say it reverently, an axe to grind with his professing
people. A son honors his father and a
servant his master. If then I am the father, where
is my honor? And if I am a master, where is
my reverence? Says the Lord of hosts to you
priests who despise my name. You see, brethren, this is axiomatic. We as God's creatures are supposed
to revere Him. We as God's creatures are supposed
to honor Him. We as God's creatures are supposed
to worship Him. So if you're not a believer here
this morning, you can't tune out and say, well, this has to
do with worship. I'm not a believer in Jesus Christ,
so it's really not applicable to me. No, there's something
called the creator-creature distinction. The creator made you. The Creator
brought you into being so that you would worship Him, so that
you would honor Him, so that you would glorify Him, so that
you would indeed ascribe good things to His great name. But
with reference to the people of God, those who have been called
out of darkness into marvelous light, those who are believers
in Jesus Christ, the same analogy holds true. If God is our Father,
where is His reference? If God is our Father, where is
the honor given to His name? You see, in church, reverence
ought to be a priority. Not frivolity, not jokes, not
hands in pockets, not slurping gum, not sucking down a latte,
but reverence before the High King of Heaven. That's what the
text calls us to. Now, notice he highlights the
specific sort of characteristic of their heartless worship. It is the perversion of sacrifice. Now, remember, sacrifice was
stipulated by God. Israel is taught in the book
of Leviticus that the only way sinful man approaches a holy
God is through a bloody knife and a smoking altar. That's thanks
to Michael Morales. I think he summarizes the book
of Leviticus excellently with that statement. The way of approach
to holy God by sinful man is through a bloody knife and a
smoking altar. That's what Leviticus is all
about. Remember, the book of Leviticus
is the answer to the problem at the end of the book of Exodus.
God's tabernacle is built. God's Shekinah glory is in the
tabernacle. Moses himself, the holiest man
in Israel, can't enter in because of the glory of God. So how do
we move from this place where God is to this place where man
can meet with Him? Hence the book of Leviticus.
It's the sacrifice. It's the bloody knife. It's the
smoking altar. This is the means by which God
and men meet together. So sacrifice is stipulated all
through the book of Leviticus. In fact, if you read the first
nine chapters, most Christians today find it tedious. Most Christians
get to about chapter four and they say, I can't keep track
of all of these sacrifices. But suffice it to say, God has
identified the way of approach to him. At the end of chapter
9, the people offer up a sacrifice that is sanctioned by the God
of heaven and earth, and they are blessed by Him. Fire falls
down from heaven, consumes the sacrifice, and the people shout,
probably for joy. Chapter 10, Nadab and Abihu offer
up strange fire. Fire comes down again, but it
doesn't consume the sacrifice, it consumes Nadab and Abihu,
because they offered up strange fire. But when we get to Leviticus
chapter 22, Leviticus chapter 22 highlights the acceptableness
of sacrifice that Israelites were to bring to God. You were
to bring the best, not the worst. See, that's what sacrifice is
about. Sacrifice implies, necessarily,
some pinch to the flesh. Sacrifice implies, necessarily,
some deprivation to the one who's offering the sacrifice. Or it
wouldn't be a sacrifice, would it? This is why Jesus commends
the widow's might. He condemns the rich man's might. There's no pinch, there's no
hardship, there's no sacrifice involved, but that widow throwing
in a couple of might, it's not the money, it's not the power,
the ability to buy, it's rather what it represents. And so God
stipulates that it must be a male from your flock, it mustn't be
blind, it mustn't be lame, it mustn't be hindered, it mustn't
be bad, it must be the best in the flock. Now back to Malachi
chapter 1, look at what they're doing. Chapter 1, verse 7, you
offer defiled food on my altar, but say, in what way have we
defiled you? By saying the table of the Lord
is contemptible. I doubt that when these priests
took the sacrifices, they audibly said the table of the Lord is
contemptible. It was their actions. It was their activities. Now
remember, the priests here represent the people. The priests are accepting
from the people these defective animals. So everybody's guilty. It's not just the priests, it's
priests and people. See, if you were a believer back
then, or you were one of the covenant people back then, the
way you would worship is you'd get up on Saturday morning, you'd
go out to your flock, you'd find the very best in the flock, and
you would walk to the tabernacle, or you would walk to the temple.
You would present yourself and your sacrifice to the priest,
you would cut the throat of the animal, then you would give it
to the priest, who would then burn some, and offer it up to
God, and depending on the sacrifice, he might eat some, and you might
eat some. You see, that was the way you did it. So I doubt these
priests are saying, well, the table of the Lord is contemptible.
I doubt any of us are saying, wow, worship is terrible. But
our actions evidence otherwise. Our conduct expresses something
different. If we have to be pulled to the
worship of God, if we have to be harangued, if we have to be
nagged, we might just be saying, the table of the Lord is contemptible.
If we are not a David, in Psalm 122, in one of those songs of
the saints, when he says, I was glad when they said unto me,
let us go to the house of the Lord. Now, you may be unhappy
at a particular church. You may be disillusioned with
a particular church. Find a church where you can have
a Psalm 122 experience, where you are glad when they said unto
me, let us go to the house of the Lord. You see, these people
were evidencing by their actions a statement that God's table
was contemptible. And then he highlights, he describes,
he evidences, he furnishes proof. The sacrifice of blind and lame
animals, verse 8. When you offer the blind as a
sacrifice, is it not evil? And when you offer the lame and
sick, is it not evil? See, brethren, I think this underscores
something else, and I have this in the notes for later. We're
just going to put it in right now. I guarantee that if you
or I went out and committed adultery, we would feel evil. If you or
I embezzled money from our employers, we would feel evil. If you or
I told a lie in a courtroom, we would feel evil. How many
times do we go through the motions on a Sunday and offer up heartless
worship to God and never feel evil? How is it the case that
we can come, not sing, not pray, not enter in, be thinking about
a million other thoughts, and then somehow conduct ourselves
as if we're just as spotless, holy, and pure as the driven
snow? I'm not trying to lay a guilt trip on you, but I'm trying to
suggest that we've kind of lost the focus of the church. The
focus of the church is what? To fix the world? Not necessarily. The focus of the church, is it
to ameliorate the downtrodden and the poor? Not necessarily. The focus of the church is the
worship of the triune God. That's what we're about. That's
what Peter says. He called you out of darkness
into marvelous light. Why? To proclaim his excellencies. What's Paul say concerning the
church in Ephesians 3? The way I read Paul is that angels
are looking at churches like this and scanning in awe of the
God who saved them. That's what we're about. We're
to reflect glory. It's not supposed to be about
us when we come in here. So it's a fundamental problem
in the church today. It's not what does God get, not
how do I serve Him, how do I glorify Him, but what's in it for me?
It's that mercenary attitude, and that's probably what's behind
the lame and the blind. You send the lame and the blind
to the priest because the ones that are fit and healthy are
going to garner more money when you sell them, right? See, what's
in it for me? What do I get out of my flock?
Do I get reasonable, acceptable worship that is pleasing to God?
Or do I get more money? Well, if I can grab the mangy
one from the back of the flock and pawn him off on the priest,
and the priesthood is so corrupt that they're going to take it,
then I'm going to sell the good ones for even more money at market.
You see, it's all this, what's in it for me? Churches exist
to answer that question. We have this for you. We have
that for you. We have this for you. We have
that for you. Now brethren, I don't wake up
on a Sunday morning hoping everybody has a miserable day. I really
don't. I have never in my life woken
up on a Sunday morning and prayed to God Almighty that everybody
would be bored, everybody would be miserable, and it would just
be a terrible experience. Reformed theology is not against
emotions and experience. Reformed theology is against
emotions and experience untethered from the truth of God's Word.
That's the problem. That's the issue. These people
were mercenary. Their priests were mercenary.
They were corrupt. They took these mangy animals,
and they took the worst of the flock, and they said, here you
go, God. That's what we think of you.
You see how they didn't need to say the table of the Lord
is contemptible? They didn't need to audibly convey that because
their actions demonstrated that. So the Lord God has a controversy
with that. Notice God's challenge in verse
eight. Offer it then to your governor. Would he be pleased
with you? Would he accept you favorably? Says the Lord of hosts.
Commentators are divided. Is this Zerubbabel, the governor
of the Jews? Remember, they don't have a king
anymore. They've been in Babylonian captivity. Now they're basically
under Persian control. It's a little bit nicer, but
nevertheless, they don't have a king. So it could have been
Zerubbabel. Other commentators said, no, it's probably the Persian
governor. Persian governor demands tribute. Persian governor demands
taxes. Persian government demands that
you pony up every year, or maybe every month. I don't know specifically. And what's God's point? You pay
this kind of stuff to your pagan governor and see if he's going
to accept it. You go ahead. You just offer that up. In fact,
do this. This coming, is it April or May?
I always get mixed up between the US and Canada, but in April
or May, you got to pay your dues, right? You got to pay the man.
You got to pay the ferryman. Tell him, you know what? Here's
all you get. I know I owe a thousand, but
I'm going to give you 400. Now those are modest calculations
to be sure, but would he accept that? Would Prime Minister Trudeau
say, good on you. That's a fantastic job that you've
done. You've slighted me $600. You
seek God's point, pay that to your governor and see if he accepts
it. See if he's pleased. Remember,
if I'm a father and I'm a master, what does the reverence do for
my name? Now notice, this is escalated, verse 13. You also
say, oh, what a weariness, and you sneer at it, says the Lord
of hosts, and you bring the stolen. If you have the King James, that
says torn. torn. And some would suggest
the idea being it was torn in a fight with another animal,
it was torn in the sort of daily rigors of earth life or farm
life, but it means rather to seize by force. It means rather to rob. And so
the new King James, I think, glosses well. You bring the stolen,
the lame and the sick, thus you bring an offering. So he's already
dealt with the blind and the lame. He's already dealt with
those that are mangy. He's already dealt with those
that are less than optimal. But he's escalating here to the
point where he says, you bring the stolen. You know my illustration,
Saturday morning, you're on your way to the tabernacle of the
temple, and Junior says, Dad, we don't have a sacrifice, and
we're going to the house of God. Well, that's OK. We'll steal
one on the way. See, that whole idea is absolutely, utterly,
positively wrong. You don't do that. You get that,
right? There's no sacrifice in stealing
someone else's property and giving it up as your own. We're all
agreed there. You see what's happening at Malachi's
day? The priests are indicted, but
the people are right there alongside of them. They're bringing the
stolen. They're bringing the lame. They're bringing the blind.
They're presenting them to the priests, and the corrupt priesthood
is all too willing to take them. Perhaps there's a quid pro quo
going on. The priests are getting something in return for accepting
these mangy beasts. But that's the problem, and the
Lord God is opposed to them. Now, note the response of the
people. First of all, how have we dishonored you? Verse 6b.
Yet you say, in what way have we despised your name? Now, I
think there's a point here that we need to appreciate so that
we don't fall prey to it. I'm going to argue that this
particular sin is common to sinners, even redeemed sinners. We can
fall into it and not even really be aware of it, right? What do
you mean we're not worshiping you properly? We come in, and
we read a psalm, and we sing a hymn, and we pray, and we read
the scriptures, and we preach. But are our hearts here? That's
the fundamental object with reference to worship. If your heart's still
in the car, or the heart's still in the office, or the heart's
still even at home, and it's not here, it doesn't matter what
the former structure is, if it's heartless, it's become external,
it's become ritualistic, it's become formalistic, and that
is what's happening here. Well, what do you mean? We brought
animals to the tabernacle. What do you mean? We brought
animals to the temple. What do you mean? We've gone
through the motions. It doesn't matter how good the
liturgy is if the people of God have no heart. Does that make
sense? The liturgy is only as good as
the people of God's hearts. No matter what, we can move things
around if we wanted. We're inclined to do that, or
we have the freedom to do that. There's elements of worship,
those things that are absolutely crucial and commanded by God
to be done, and then there's circumstances. We can meet at
11. We can meet at 10.30. We can meet at 10.45. I think
it's weird to meet at 10.48, the way some churches do, because
they're being so countercultural. Now, but they're still free to
do that. You see the point, brother? If we have the ritual, we have
the form, we have the external, but we haven't got the heart,
we have fallen prey to what these people have. They don't even
know it. They're shocked. What do you
mean? You ever done that with your kids? You ask them, what
do you mean? That's how they are. Again, petulant children.
What do you mean? How have we defiled your altar?
How have we ripped you off? How have we robbed God? Because
you don't give to God, chapter three. You don't do what you're
supposed to do based on God's holy law. So that's the point.
How have we dishonored you? How have we perverted sacrifice? Verse 7b, you offer defiled food
on my altar, but say, in what way have we defiled you? By saying,
the table of the Lord is contemptible. And when you offer the blind
as a sacrifice, is it not evil? You see, accusation or indictment,
questioned by the people, and then proof. See, brethren, if
you try to act against God in a defensive manner, He'll always
be able to pony up the proof. Those indictments don't come
without omniscience. Those indictments don't come
without absolute knowledge. Those indictments come to us
by His grace, ultimately. So I think we're messed up in
that, too. Somebody tells us something we don't want to hear,
we get mad at them. Praise God, people tell us things we don't
want to hear. Now there's things we don't want to hear that we
can't control. Boy, your hair's gray, or you're too short, or
you're too... We can't control that. But brother,
sister, husband, wife, son, daughter, father, mother, you've sinned,
and the Bible says you need to repent. Why do we get so mad
at people? What's David say? David was happy when the righteous
smote him. David was happy when he was rebuked
by those who loved him. What's one of the purposes of
holy writ? All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is
profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness. Do we think we're already in
a place of perfect instruction and performance? That we don't
need the reproving function of scripture? That we don't need
the correction of scripture? Have we actually gotten that
proud where we don't see our need for the Word of God to reprove
us and to correct us? Instead of getting upset that
God would reprove us and correct us, we should be thankful. What's
Jesus say to the worst of the seven churches in Asia Minor?
As many as I love, I rebuke. He says that to the Laodiceans.
As many as I love, I rebuke. That's the character of our blessed
Savior. And brethren, we ought to be
open to such things. And then notice, this is just
an incredible sort of escalation. Verses 9 and 10 go a bit of different
ways in terms of the commentators. Here's what I think is going
on. In verse 9, they are actually saying, why doesn't God bless
us? And again, I think this is so typical of us. We, you know,
half-hearted. in our service to God, divided
in our devotion to God, lacking completely in our attention to
God, and then we have the gall to say, why doesn't he bless
us? Why isn't he just opening the channels of heaven and flowing
down nuggets upon us? We have that kind of gall, don't
we? And I think that's what verse nine is all about. But now, entreat
God's favor, that he may be gracious to us. While this is being done
by your hands, will he accept you favorably, says the Lord
of hosts? You think you always bail? You think that just putting
the animal in the proper place is going to affect the deity
in such a way that he pours out blessings? You are really thinking
like bailists, and you are not thinking like those who bow before
the God of heaven and earth. And then verse 10, I think, is
God, through the prophet, speaking ironically. Again, it's tough.
There's at least one other popular interpretation that could be
the case. But in my understanding, I think
verse 10 is God, through the prophet, saying, Who is there,
even among you, who would shut the doors, so that you would
not kindle fire on my altar in vain? I have no pleasure in you,
says the Lord of hosts, nor will I accept an offering from your
hands." I think this is consistent theologically with the church
in Laodicea, that Jesus promises, or threatens rather, to vomit
out of his mouth. They're neither hot nor cold,
they're lukewarm. And some say, well, it's better
to be a rabid atheist. I don't think that's what it
means. Cold water is pleasant. Hot liquid coffee is pleasant.
Lukewarm, bad. That's the analogy. That's the
specifics. That's what's going on. Jesus
is not saying to the Laodiceans, it's better to be an all-out
atheist. You please me more. No. Be hot or be cold. But if you're lukewarm, if you've
got that sort of namby-pamby, in-out sort of a mindset, I'm
going to vomit you out of my mouth. And that use of irony
is consistent in scripture, and I think that's what's happening
here. God, through the prophet, is saying, is there anyone in
Israel that'll take two-by-fours, that will take nails, that will
take hammers, and go to the door of the temple and slam it shut
so that these people will not continue to go through this charade,
this perversion, this sort of sacrifice, I'm not going to accept
that. I'm not going to deal with that.
God says I refuse it and reject it. Now notice verse 11 is an
interesting statement. For from the rising of the sun
even to its going down, my name shall be great among the Gentiles.
Now, we as Gentiles have come to grips with Gentile inclusion
in the covenant of grace. We as Gentiles appreciate the
promise made to Abraham as involving all the nations of the earth.
We as Gentiles praise the God of Israel for having sent his
son as Messiah, for engaging in that work at Calvary to save
not only Jews, but Gentiles. But remember, in Malachi's day,
they weren't quite as advanced in their covenant theology. especially
the unbelievers. Believers would have been seeing,
they would have known, they would have had in their mind, there's
a day coming when the nations of the earth will come to Israel's
God. But when the Lord says that to
them in this context, it's probably more indictment upon them. For
from the rising of the sun, even to its going down, my name shall
be great among the Gentiles. Now, remember Jonah. What was
Jonah's problem? We know him as a preacher on
the run. Jonah was called to go to Nineveh,
so he goes the other way, right? Don't dare to be a Jonah. Jonah's
not a great model. I preached this message one time,
and somebody, this was way back, somebody came up afterwards and
said, man, I don't know if we should have named our boy Jonah.
Jonah's a good name. Jonah was a prophet of God. He
was the real deal. But he was like all of us. He's
got issues, just like all of us. So God calls Jonah to go
to Nineveh. Jonah goes the other way. Then
Jonah actually goes to Nineveh, and he preaches the word of God.
And the Ninevites repent. It's a massive revival of true
religion. It's an awakening of true religion.
Jonah saw glorious things from the hand of a glorious God, and
at the very end, Jonah's upset. He's angry. He's mad. Why? Because Jonah was a nationalist. Jonah didn't want non-Jews coming
into the covenant mercies of God. Jonah didn't want men from
every tribe, tongue, people, and nation. Jonah wanted Jews
safe. Thank you very much. He didn't want these rotten,
treacherous Ninevites to come to know Israel's God. That's
kind of what's happening there at the end of Jonah 4. God teaches
him a lesson, to be sure. God shows very clearly his mercy,
should I not pity Nineveh that has this many people and animals
as well? I mean, of course God should,
right? See, Jonah's upset. So there was this nationalistic
spirit within Israel. Oh no, no, you can't come to
our God. You can't have the mercies of
Yahweh. Now, again, there were proselytes,
there were people that did come in, Ruth the Moabitess, we have
some that did enter in, but by and large, You know, the religion
of Israel in the Old Covenant wasn't really evangelistic. They
didn't really go out conquering the nations for King Jesus. They did let some in, but there
was this nationalism. So perhaps Malachi, when God,
through Malachi, highlights this, it's a bit of a provocation,
perhaps. Gentiles are gonna serve me.
Gentiles are gonna offer up sacrifice. Gentiles are gonna come to Israel's
God. Gentiles are gonna bow. And you, Jews, are not? See,
this is a terrible thing. Matthew Henry made this observation.
This is a plain prediction of that great revolution in the
kingdom of grace by which the Gentiles, who had been strangers
and foreigners, came to be fellow citizens with the saints and
of the household of God and as welcome to the throne of grace
as ever the Jews had been. So this idea of Gentile inclusion
in the covenant promises of God are not isolated to Genesis chapter
12. The rest of the Old Testament amplifies, expands, and expounds
upon that promise made to Abraham in terms of Gentile inclusion
in the covenant promises of God. So there's our accusation or
indictment by God and the response of the people. Let's just draw
out, as I said, some practical implications concerning heartless
worship. In the first place, and I touched
on this previously, but it bears repetition, we need to understand
this is evil. This is evil. It's just bad. Now, I understand, brethren,
the tendency. I understand the difficulty. There was a Puritan author that
wrote either a book or a treatise on the subject of dealing with
wandering thoughts during the worship of God. I understand
that. I understand. I understand, you
know, we come in after a long week and the urge to perhaps
close our eyes. I get that. And I'm not here
to upbraid you. I'm not here to say, you terrible
specimens of human beings. You're just the worst. I can't
believe it. I'm not saying that at all. But I'm suggesting that
the common garden variety struggles that we as creatures have is
one thing. But heartless worship of God.
I'm not entering in. of putting in the time, but not
doing so from the heart. That's not just a small thing,
that's evil. It's identified by God twice
as evil in our text. Verse 8 says, and when you offer
the blind as a sacrifice, is it not evil? This is an evil thing. Verse
8 continuing, and when you offer the lame and sick, is it not
evil? So earlier when I said if we
committed adultery, if we perjured ourselves on the stand, if we
murdered somebody, we would feel evil. By all means, feel evil. By all means, let that conscience,
you know, brutalize you, because you deserve to feel evil if you
commit one of those particular sins. But the same is true with
heartless worship. It's evil. Getting up on a Sunday
morning and grabbing the mangiest from the flock and bringing it
to the house of God and just going through the motions so
that you can just go through the motions. That's not pleasing
to God. God's not saying goody on you.
And I think all of this ought to make us revel in the one who
said, my meat, my food, is to do the will of him who sent me.
What's Jesus say? What did the disciples interpret
in John chapter 2, after Christ drives out the money changers
from the temple? They think Psalm 69, zeal for your house has eaten
me up. That's what they saw when they
saw Christ. Why does Christ have that kind of zeal? Because none
of us do. I'm not justifying it, I'm not
saying it's okay, I'm not saying dare to be a better worshiper,
but I am suggesting that a survey like this ought to make us revel
in the blood of Jesus Christ, His Son, which cleanses us from
all sin. It is evil. John Calvin made
the observation, few think that they pollute God and His name
when they worship Him superstitiously or formally as though they had
to do with a child. But we see that God Himself declares
that the whole of religion is profane and that His name is
shamefully polluted when men thus trifle with Him. It's evil. Secondly, as mentioned before,
it's common with sinners. You notice that Malachi is not
bringing new information to them? Oh, let me just re-instruct you
in the things of the tabernacle, or rather the temple worship.
Let me just give you some new information. They had this in
Leviticus. Chapter 22 specifies what animals are acceptable and
what animals are not. So the problem isn't that we
need new information in order to achieve this place of the
worship of God. No, we need to act upon the information
we already have. We need to sing the Bible. We
need to pray the Bible. We need to preach the Bible.
We need to see the Bible in the sacraments of the church. We
need to read the Bible. It's all supposed to be scriptural. So the information is not new
that the prophet brings to him. In fact, one commentator named
Stewart says the priests knew these sacrificial laws by heart
as was required for their job. Be similar to the prophet coming
to you, and you're a mechanic, and you're supposed to change
the spark plugs, and the prophet's leaning over your shoulder. Take
that wrench, and turn that plug, and pull that. You're looking
at him like, I know this is my job. This is what I do. Well,
the prophet has come to these priests and said, look, this
is what you're supposed to do. It's been specified. This is
the spirit of Micah 6, 8, one of the most popular verses in
all of the Old Testament. He has shown you, oh man, what's
the context? Israel's actually saying, would
God be pleased if we sacrificed our children? Would God be pleased
if we brought all this oil? And the prophet's response is,
he's shown you, you know what it is. This makes it even worse. You're culpable, you're responsible,
you're liable to God's wrath because you know better and you're
too lazy to do it. Stuart says, the priest knew
these sacrificial laws by heart as was required for their job.
Ignorance was not the problem. God was not advising them of
considerations that were new to their thinking. Malachi, like
all the Orthodox prophets, was not calling his audience to new
standards, but back to old ones. That's important for the church
today. You think maybe we should listen to the Bible to tell us
how we to worship God? Yeah, I think so. As I've said
before, brethren, a lot of us have a tough time getting out
of bed, figuring out what to make for dinner, figuring out
specific things. Are we such that we can put together
worship of the living and true God? Or are we better just to
listen to what He says and do what He says? I opt for the latter. Listen to what He says and do
what He says. This has been enshrined in the
Reformed tradition as the regulative principle of worship. Albert
N. Martin describes it, I think,
very helpfully when he says, with reference to worship, we
do nothing more, nothing less, and nothing else than God has
commanded in His Word. It's a great compendium, a great
description. Terry Johnson uses that idea
of pray the Word, preach the Word, read the Word, sing the
Word, see the Word. The regulative principle of worship.
God regulates how we are to approach Him. In Hebrews chapter 12, we're
told that our worship must be acceptable. Acceptable to who? To us? Is that really the emphasis by
the Apostle of Hebrews 12? Or is it supposed to be acceptable
to God? See, today it's what's acceptable
to us, what makes me happy, what tunes my emotions, what caters
to my experience. That's not the proper way to
figure out whether worship is successful or not. It's about
God. Just as I've been pondering this
passage over the last couple of days, the Southern Baptist
Convention, one of their, I think the leader of the Southern Baptist
Convention, told people to stay home today. It's been a busy
season, you know, it's the, you know, between Christmas and New
Year's, holidays, you know, these big churches have big production
teams and, you know, just worship at home today. Are you kidding
me? You're going to just say no to
the Sabbath day? You're going to say no to the
public worship of the living God? Maybe you should say no
to your production team. Maybe you should say no to having
more in place than God's ever commanded to begin with. Brethren,
it is the privilege of the people of God to have that Psalm 122
experience every Sunday morning. I was glad when they said unto
me, let us go to the house of the Lord. Again, we may be sluggish.
We may be tired. We may need some grace to pray
that. We may say with that man, I believe, help thou mine unbelief.
But brethren, the root of the matter is in the hearts of the
people of God. They don't have to be harangued.
They don't have to be nagged. They don't have to be browbeaten.
They want to be where God's people are. It's just a fundamental,
I just praise God that in my Christian life, when my brother
discipled me, he said, not just my physical brother-in-law, Matthew,
true, but there was Richard Barcelos. I was a brand new believer, didn't
know anything. They told me some very good advice.
Whenever the church is open, go, read your Bible every day
and pray. Okay. That's just axiomatic,
that's first principle stuff. When I started to grow as a Christian,
I became a pastor, I realized everybody didn't get that same
advice. So I'm gonna give it to you right
now. Read your Bible every day, pray every day, and never miss
church, never. I remember the experience of
Jeff Gilmore, just using a few names here. I remember when he
was at Trinity Western University. He was an RA. And I remember
a fellow one time said to him, you know a lot about theology
in the Bible. Did you go to seminary? He said, no, I go to church.
Now, I don't say that because it somehow touts Jim Butler.
No, the truth is there. 1 Timothy 3.15, the church is
the pillar and ground of the truth. Why don't God's people
want the truth? Why do people say, if not verbally,
in their actions, the table of the Lord is contemptible when
they don't come to where his truth is? You see, brethren,
it is common with sinners. It is concerned with externals
only, formalistic, ritualistic. We got the externals in place.
We read, we prayed, we sang, but our hearts were still in
the car. Fourthly, it reveals boredom
with God. I mean, that's what verse 13
tells us. Notice, you say, you also say, oh, what a weariness. It's just, I can't be bothered.
I got these good animals to go out and sell, right? I can't
be bothered with, you know, offering these things up to the Lord.
I can't be bothered with the time necessary to actually grow
in the grace and in the knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ. That
means demands on my time. People will put up with a lot,
but see, God goes right for the juggler. He says, I want your
time, I want your money. Wait a minute. We don't like
that. You can have the worst in my
flock. You can have that old car, but by time? See, that's what the emphasis
there is in verse 12. I'm sorry, verse 13. You also
say, oh, what a weariness, and you sneer at it. I wonder if
that's why all the innovation exists in churches today. Well,
people will be bored if we just preach to them. People will be
bored if we just sing psalms. People will be bored if we just
sing those old hymns from the Trinity. I mean, brethren, that's
the complaint I've heard. I haven't heard it so much lately,
but what do you think was the complaint I would hear when people,
specifically out of charismatic backgrounds, would visit our
church? They'd have no problem telling me, your church is boring.
Oh, I'm sorry. Maybe we can spice it up a bit
for you. Maybe we can bring in some ponies.
Maybe we can bring in a trapeze." See, that's what some churches
are doing. They're responding to the goats,
trying to entertain and amuse them, rather than obeying the
God who has said, preach to them. but they won't endure it. Preach
to them. They don't like sound doctrine.
Preach to them. They want ponies. Preach to them. They want puppets. Preach to
them. They want trapeze. Preach to them. They want clowns. Preach to them. You see, that's
the mandate for the people of God. We are not supra-wise. We are not better than God. We
are not more knowledgeable than God. And we don't have the right
to be innovators or creators when it comes to worship. We're
not marketing a product. We're not selling a thing. We
are preaching the gospel of the everlasting God. We are calling
sinners to believe and repent. We're calling men to worship
God aright through Jesus Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit.
Whether their emotions are on the hot rise, whether their experiences
are completely satisfied, that's not our concern. Again, I hope
you have good emotional experiences, both emotional experience. I
hope you have that, but I hope it's driven by the truth. I say
that a man who goes to the emotions, who goes to the experience without
going through the brain is a man to be guarded against. Anybody
can get up and manipulate a crowd. Anybody can get up and say enough
rah-rah sorts of things. Anybody can be a motivational
speaker. If it is devoid from the truth
of God's holy word, I would say run from that place. Run fast
from that place. But if it's exposition of God's
Word, you're being instructed in the truth of God's Word, however
that Word may come, that's what's important. That's what's supposed
to stir the emotions. That's what's supposed to drive
the experience. Otherwise, you get the sorts
of nonsense and madness that we have witnessed pervasively
within what's called the Church over the last couple of hundred
years. Stuff that is just full of contempt for the table of
the Lord. As well, it provokes the judgment
of God. This is the final implication.
It provokes the judgment of God. The suggestion in verse 8, offer
it to your governor. What does that suggest? It suggests
that God is provoked. It suggests that God is angry.
It suggests that God is going to visit them with retribution.
Go ahead and offer it to your governor and see what he does
with it. He'll probably send a band of troops to gun you down
because you are stealing from the government. That's how they
deal. I don't know how bad it is in
Revenue Canada, but IRS? An agent once told my mother,
if you hide money in your backyard, the IRS will find it. I've never
doubted that at all. That's how your governor deals.
That's what verse eight is. Give it to your governor, see
if he accepts it. Verse 10, is there one among you that'll board
the doors closed so that we don't go through this rigmarole anymore?
And then verse 14, a straight out pronouncement of curse upon
deceivers. Notice verse 14, cursed be the
deceiver who has in his flock a male and takes a vow. You see,
that was the stipulation. It's not saying female animals
are bad. It doesn't say men are better. None of that stuff that
would aggravate the snowflakes of our day. The stipulation for
acceptable worship was a male from the flock. Again, sacrifice. A male at the market would garner
more money. You need to pinch the flesh.
You need to feel it. So he says, Cursed be the deceiver
who has in his flock a male and takes a vow, but sacrifices to
the Lord who is blemished. Why? For I'm a great king, says
the Lord of hosts, and my name is to be feared among the nations.
I am a great king, and you're going to bring me this pathetic
offering? I am the God of absolute sovereignty and majesty. I'm
the God who brought you out of darkness into marvelous light.
I freed you from Egyptian bondage and captivity, and you're gonna
deceive? You're gonna swindle? You're
gonna be that kind of person that takes the mangy and the
lame and the blind and the stolen and present it up to me? God
says, no way. This provokes the very wrath
of God Most High. Well, in conclusion, we need
first good theology. So you can't have good worship
without good theology. It's what we believe about God
that moves us to worship God. Remember, He called you out of
darkness into His marvelous light so that, purpose clause, you
may proclaim His praises. You may proclaim His excellencies. You have to understand the system
of redemption is biblically defined to fuel worship. We need to know
God. We're going to look at that tonight
in John 17. Jesus says, this is eternal life,
that they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ
whom thou hast sent. If we don't know this God, we're
not going to revere him. If we don't know this God, we're
not going to fear him. If we don't know this God, we're
not going to present ourselves as living sacrifices, which Paul
says is our reasonable or our rational service unto God. A
couple of brothers in a book they wrote called With Reverence
and Awe. It's a book on worship, Daryl
Hart and John Meather. It says, because of the close
connection between good theology and appropriate worship, corporate
acts of praise and devotion that conflict with reformed theology
must flow from unsound doctrine. In effect, our worship provides
a barometer of our theology. Now, that may a bit be confusing,
I kind of took it out of context, but I think their point is this.
With this sort of resurgence on Calvinism or Reformed theology,
why don't our churches look like there's a resurgence of Calvinism
or Reformed theology? Whence the disconnect? We say
we worship the God of absolute sovereignty, power, majesty,
and glory, and we dare to cancel services on the Sabbath day?
We dare to tell people, you don't need to really come to church
today. We dare to introduce strange fire into the worship of God.
We are Calvinistic or we are reformed. Our worship will evidence
that fact. There will not be a disconnect
between the theology and between the worship of God. What is Calvinism
or reformed theology except the exaltation of God? What should
our worship be? It should be a rehearsal and
exaltate the God of heaven and earth. I'm getting what is ours
and again, I don't wake up saying I hope everybody leaves defeated
and and unhappy and And let down and that there's nothing for
them. So I have this zany idea that the Word of God always helps
the people of God They may not recognize it immediately, but
they will the Word of God always helps you That's another sort
of piece of advice I can give you. Always, you'll never be
let down by knowing more Bible. Oh boy, I spent all that time
memorizing scripture. My life's a mess. That's not
typically what people say. I'm so thankful that I spent
all that time memorizing scripture, because my life's a mess. And
it's that scripture that's the buoy. It's the scripture that's
the stabilizer. It's the scripture that's the
security for me in the mess. See, theology drives worship. Secondly, we need responsible
leadership. Look at chapter 2. Remember I
said it's an indictment of the priest that goes from 1.6 to
2.9. 2.6. The law of truth was in his mouth. This is when Levi is initially
called as sort of the priestly office in Israel. And injustice
was not found on his lips. He walked with me in peace and
equity and turned many away from iniquity. Verse 7. For the lips
of a priest should keep knowledge, and people should seek the law
from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts.
Helps you to understand the qualifications for elders in 1 Timothy 3 and
Titus 1. Helps you to understand Peter's
emphasis in 1 Peter 5. You need a qualified leadership.
You need men that aren't going to look the other way when somebody
brings this blind or this mangy beast and says, oh, this is my
sacrifice for Yahweh. Responsible leadership would
say, that's not acceptable for Yahweh. Go back home, find the
best, and bring it to God. You don't sanction this because
you might get something out of it. You certainly don't need
CEOs. You don't need the power sort
of guys. You need faithful preachers of the Word of God. It's another
lesson I wish the church corporately, not just ours, but the church
in general, would just get. We don't need celebrities. We
don't need people fawning over leaders. We just need guys that
get up in the morning and do what they're supposed to do.
Is that so hard to act for? Guys that get up and just do
what they're supposed to do. I think it's getting more and
more difficult. Guys that just get up. That would be a great
sort of way to examine a fellow for ministry. Are you going to
just get up every morning and do what you're supposed to do?
Yes. All right. Good. Welcome. Welcome to pastoral
ministry. It'll be a little bit more involved
than that, but That's it. We don't need celebrities. We
don't need book tours. We don't need cups. We don't
need t-shirts. We just need men that will take
seriously Paul's final admonition to Timothy on the corporate level.
Preach the word. Be ready in season and out of
season. Convince, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and teaching.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine.
So Timothy, preach the word. Preach sound doctrine to them.
We need as well biblical worship. The Bible is filled with references
to biblical worship. Deuteronomy 5, 7 to 10. You all know what Deuteronomy
5, 7 to 10 is. Deuteronomy 5, 7 to 10 is the
first and second commandment. Defines the God we are supposed
to worship and defines the manner in which we're supposed to worship.
Deuteronomy 12, God says, nothing more, nothing less, and nothing
else. Do not add to my word. We see
it in 1 Timothy 3, Paul writes to Timothy, so that you may know
how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God. I already
referred to Hebrews chapter 12 in the reference to acceptable
worship. As I said, this principle is
enshrined in the great confessions of faith from the 17th century.
Aaron says, the acceptable way of worshipping the true God is
instituted by himself and so limited by his own revealed will
that he may not be worshipped according to the imagination
and devices of men, nor the suggestions of Satan under any visible representations
or any other way not prescribed in the Holy Scriptures. That
makes perfect sense, doesn't it? If we ask the question of
the Bible, how do you want us to worship you? The Bible has
a very clear and candid answer. God doesn't say you need to be
innovators, you need to be creators, you need to be the most creative
sorts of people so that you can figure out how to come to God.
Praise God He didn't leave it to us to figure it out because
we wouldn't have figured it out. John Calvin makes this observation
with reference to this principle of worship. two advantages to
worship regulated in this manner. He says, first, it tends greatly
to establish God's authority that we do not follow our own
pleasure, but depend entirely on His sovereignty. And secondly,
such is our folly that when we are left at liberty, all we are
able to do is go astray. And when once we have turned
aside from the right path, there is no end to our wanderings until
we get buried under a multitude of superstitions. You see, that
establishes the authority of God and it keeps us in check. We need both of those. We need
to know and understand the authority of God, and we need to be kept
in check. Now, if you're not a believer
here this morning, my encouragement to you is not show up next Sunday
with brighter disposition. Show up next Sunday earlier.
Show up Sunday, you know, with more of a desire to sing louder.
My emphasis to you is to look to the sacrifice provided by
God for sinners. Get that? I'm not telling you
this morning to fix your life, to get better at worship, to
put on better clothes. I think all those things are
helpful. I think a good night's sleep on Saturday. I think dressing
up. I think all that. Those are all
good things. I mean, if we went to visit the Prime Minister,
we would probably shave, we'd probably do certain things, right?
The point for unbelievers this morning is not fix up the externals,
but to look by faith to the sacrifice provided by God. John says, John
1.29, not John the Apostle who wrote the book, but John the
Baptist who saw, said, Behold the Lamb of God who takes away
the sin of the world. The answer for unbelievers this
morning. The answer for sinners this morning. Now that may offend you. You
may not like being called an unbeliever or a sinner. Guess
what? I'm a sinner. Everybody in here is a sinner.
Most everybody in here was an unbeliever at one time. I'm sorry
if the identifiers of the labels are offensive, but the counsel,
listen to the counsel. The emphasis is not try to fix
yourself up, get better at worship. The emphasis is on look to the
Lamb of God. Believe on him who alone can
save to the uttermost all who draw nigh to God through faith.
Well, let us close in a word of prayer. Father, we thank you
for your word, and we thank you for the clarity of the prophets,
and for this passage in particular. And we pray that you would help
us as we enter into a new year to be committed to the truth
of Holy Scripture, to be committed to the things that you've ordained
for our good. We know these means are calculated
for our good, for our conformity unto the image of our Lord Jesus
Christ. I do pray that all over the earth
today, people would behold the Lamb of God, that all over the
earth today, people would believe on Him who takes away the sin
of the world. And I pray specifically for sinners here that they, by
grace, would look unto Him and find salvation through Christ.
We bless you and we thank you for this time together, and we
pray that you would go with us now, and we pray through Jesus
Christ our Lord. Amen. We'll close with a brief
time of meditation.