Cited in sermons
Fred Malone
6 sermons · All people cited
2LCF Chapter 29 - Of Baptism
The 1689 London Baptist Confession chapter 29 sets forth a thoroughgoing Baptist doctrine of baptism: its nature as a New Covenant ordinance ordained by the incarnate mediator, its proper recipients as professing believers alone, its proper element and Trinitarian formula, and its proper mode as immersion. The study presses the case for believers-only baptism across five arguments — from covenant theology, federal headship, the doctrine of salvation, New Testament clarity, and the regulative principle of worship — demonstrating that paedo-baptism is not merely a secondary matter but a violation of Christ's express institution. The session closes with extended Q&A engaging questions about baptismal regeneration, the formula 'in the name of Jesus only,' and the standing of paedobaptist believers.
2LCF Chapter 29 - Of Baptism, Part 3 - Paedobaptist Arguments
Believers' baptism rests on the covenant distinction between Israel after the flesh and the spiritual seed of Abraham, and no paedobaptist argument survives the scrutiny of those covenantal boundaries. This third study in the confession's chapter on baptism works through six major paedobaptist arguments — from the Abrahamic covenant, household baptisms, federal holiness, and more — and answers each from Scripture, the 1689 confession, and Nehemiah Cox's seventeenth-century Baptist covenant theology. A question-and-answer period then addresses practical matters: rebaptism after sprinkling or infant immersion, communicating credo-baptist convictions to paedobaptist family and elders, prerequisites for baptism, minimum age, and the necessity of immersion as the sign that answers the thing signified.
2LCF Chapter 29 - Of Baptism, Part 2
Credobaptism rests on five mutually reinforcing theological arguments: covenant theology, federal headship, the doctrine of salvation, the clarity of New Testament revelation, and the regulative principle of worship. This session (Part 2 of a study on 2LCF Chapter 29) works through the final three arguments, demonstrating from Romans 6, Acts 2, Acts 8–9, Galatians 3, and 1 Corinthians 10 that baptism signifies union with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection, and therefore belongs only to those who actually possess that union. The session closes by showing that infant sprinkling not only lacks any express divine command but positively contradicts the explicit command to baptize believers only — an inconsistency that even notable paedo-baptist writers (Owen, Calvin, Matthew Henry) expose in their own defenses of the regulative principle of worship.
2LCF Chapter 29 - Of Baptism
The 1689 London Baptist Confession chapter 29 on baptism is expounded under two headings: the lawful recipients of the ordinance and its proper mode. The confession's definition of baptism as a sign of union with Christ in his death and resurrection is shown to require that only those who have actually professed repentance and faith are its proper subjects — a conclusion argued from covenant theology, positive law, and the consistent narrative of the New Testament. The proper mode is established as full immersion in water in the name of the triune God, grounded in the example of Christ at the Jordan, the Greek term baptizo, and the burial-and-resurrection imagery of Romans 6.
The Passion, the Resurrection, and Justification by Faith Alone
Romans 4:25 sets the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the inseparable ground of the believer's justification before God. This sermon expounds that single verse within the broader context of Romans 3:21–4:25, where Paul establishes that justification is by faith alone — not by circumcision, moral refinement, or works — and demonstrates from Abraham and David that God imputes righteousness to the ungodly who believe. The necessity of Christ's atoning death and bodily resurrection are treated as twin non-negotiables: without blood shed there is no remission, and without a risen Savior justification remains unconfirmed and faith is vain. Believers are called to rest in the finished work of Christ alone — delivered up for their offenses, raised for their justification — and to resist the accuser by returning to these objective gospel realities.
Christ's Circumcision
Colossians 2:11–12 is frequently marshalled by paedobaptists to argue that baptism has replaced circumcision as the covenant sign and therefore ought to be administered to infants, but the passage cannot bear that weight. This sermon works through three preliminary observations — the structure of covenant theology, the relationship between circumcision and baptism, and the actual point of the passage — before exegeting verses 11–12 directly. The circumcision Paul describes is spiritual regeneration performed by Christ without hands, and baptism is its retrospective public sign, not a parallel to the prospective sign of physical circumcision given to Abraham's infant sons. The sermon closes with a sharp warning against any gospel that supplements Christ's finished work, insisting that justification is an alien, forensic righteousness imputed to the believer by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.