Cited in sermons
David Van Drunen
7 sermons · All people cited
Laws Concerning Homicide and Witnesses
Deuteronomy 19 applies three commandments of the Decalogue to the concrete conditions of civil life in Old Covenant Israel: the sixth commandment through legislation on cities of refuge distinguishing accidental homicide from murder, the eighth commandment through the prohibition on moving property landmarks, and the ninth commandment through the law of witnesses and its penalties for perjury. The sermon examines the distinction between manslaughter and premeditated murder, the role of the avenger of blood, the lex talionis as a limiting and proportional principle, and the blood-guiltiness that falls on a nation that fails to execute justice. The overarching application is that these laws reveal the sanctity of human life, the justice of God in civil society, and the sinfulness that made such detailed legislation necessary — all of which drives the hearer to the new covenant, in which Christ alone kept what Israel could not.
Deuteronomy 5:17 - 6th Commandment Part 4
Deuteronomy 5:17 forbids murder, not all killing, and the Westminster Larger Catechism identifies three exceptions: public justice, lawful war, and necessary defense. This sermon, the fourth in a series on the sixth commandment, examines the scriptural warrant for lawful war, moving from Old Testament legislation governing warfare and holy war through New Testament evidence of a consistently favorable view of the military. The argument concludes that Romans 13 authorizes civil government to wield the sword against both criminal offenders and foreign invaders, that this function is wholly consistent with the personal ethic of Matthew 5 and Romans 12, and that criteria derived from Augustine, Aquinas, and Turretin provide a biblical framework for distinguishing just from unjust war.
The Sixth Commandment, Part 3
The sixth commandment, 'You shall not murder' (Deuteronomy 5:17), prohibits unlawful killing with premeditation and malice, but the Bible distinguishes murder from lawful taking of life in capital punishment, self-defense, and just war. This study works through the Old Testament legal framework for self-defense, particularly Exodus 22:2–3, alongside several narrative examples, to establish that defensive homicide is not forbidden by Scripture. The teaching of Jesus in Matthew 5:38–42 is examined carefully to show that the Sermon on the Mount addresses personal, interpersonal ethics — not a universal prohibition on self-defense — and that Jesus himself assumes people will protect themselves and others. The study concludes with a call to think with biblical clarity on these matters in an age of muddled Christian ethics.
2LCF Chapter 21 - Of Christian Liberty and Liberty of Conscience
Christian liberty, properly understood, is not primarily about matters of lifestyle preference but about the freedom Christ has purchased for believers: freedom from the guilt, power, and punishment of sin, and freedom for joyful, childlike access to and obedience toward God. The 1689 London Baptist Confession chapter 21 unfolds this in three movements — the definition of Christian liberty (paragraph 1), the protection of liberty of conscience (paragraph 2), and the qualification that Christian liberty is never a license to sin (paragraph 3). Central to paragraph 2 is the confession's axiomatic claim that God alone is Lord of the conscience, which means neither civil authority nor ecclesiastical authority may bind the conscience beyond or against the Word of God. The practical application presses believers to distinguish between God's explicit commands and their own preferences, and to resist the near-universal temptation to elevate personal opinion to the status of thus saith the Lord.
Death Penalty, Part 3
Romans 13:1–7 furnishes the New Testament's clearest warrant for civil government bearing the sword, including capital punishment — yet common objections, both biblical and pragmatic, continue to challenge this teaching. This third installment of a study arising from Leviticus 20 addresses the two most significant biblical objections: the pacifist misreading of Matthew 5:38–42 and the attempt to leverage John 8:1–11 against lawful execution. The sermon argues that Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount is correcting the misapplication of the lex talionis to personal relationships, not dismantling civil jurisprudence, and that his handling of the woman caught in adultery actually upholds Mosaic evidentiary law rather than nullifying capital punishment. Five pragmatic objections — that the death penalty is incompatible with Christian forgiveness, lacks mercy, risks executing the innocent, fails to deter, and forecloses salvation — are each answered from Scripture and reason.
A Defense of Self-Defense
Matthew 5:38–42, the fourth antithesis of the Sermon on the Mount, is frequently invoked to condemn self-defense, capital punishment, and military service — yet a careful reading reveals that Jesus is not contradicting the lex talionis of the Mosaic civil code but rather correcting the Pharisaic habit of applying that courtroom principle to personal, day-to-day relationships. The contrast is not Jesus versus Moses but Jesus versus bad hermeneutics: what the civil magistrate is authorized to do with the sword (Romans 13:1–4) stands entirely intact, and Exodus 22:2–3's legitimization of self-defense is nowhere repealed. The sermon works through Jesus' four illustrations — insult, property disputes, conscription, and benevolence — to show that Christ is calling his disciples to a disposition of patience and forbearance in ordinary life, not to a pacifism that would render them incapable of functioning in civil society.
Sunday School - Biblical view of self-defense, part 2
Matthew 5:38–42 is frequently misread as a blanket prohibition against self-defense, capital punishment, and just war — three instances of justifiable homicide that Scripture plainly upholds. This exposition argues that Jesus is not contradicting the lex talionis (the law of retribution found in Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy) but is correcting the Pharisaic misapplication of a civil-judicial principle to everyday interpersonal conduct. The passage addresses four specific situations — insult, litigation, conscription, and benevolence — and calls believers to a disposition of forbearance in personal relations, while leaving entirely untouched the legitimacy of lawful self-defense, just war, and capital punishment as administered by the civil magistrate.